04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

204 CHAPTER 9. GENERAL METHODS: CRITICAL EXPONENTS.<br />

or<br />

χ =<br />

Tr S0βMe −β(H−hM)<br />

Tr e −β(H−hM)<br />

This can be transformed to<br />

−<br />

Tr S0e −β(H−hM) TrβM e −β(H−hM)<br />

Tr e −β(H−hM) 2<br />

(9.60)<br />

χ = β <br />

{〈S0Si〉 − 〈S0〉〈Si〉} (9.61)<br />

i<br />

χ = β <br />

〈S0 − m〉〈Si − m〉 (9.62)<br />

i<br />

which clearly shows th<strong>at</strong> χ is directly rel<strong>at</strong>ed to the fluctu<strong>at</strong>ions in the spin<br />

variables. Here we used 〈S0〉 = 〈Si〉 = m.<br />

If fluctu<strong>at</strong>ions are uncorrel<strong>at</strong>ed we have < AB >=< A >< B > which would<br />

seem to imply th<strong>at</strong> for uncorrel<strong>at</strong>ed fluctu<strong>at</strong>ions χ = 0. Th<strong>at</strong> is not correct,<br />

however. Fluctu<strong>at</strong>ions on the same site are always correl<strong>at</strong>ed, and in th<strong>at</strong> case<br />

we would get χ =< (S0 − m) 2 >, which is always positive indeed.<br />

It is customary to define a spin-correl<strong>at</strong>ion function Γi by<br />

Γi(T ) = 〈S0Si〉T − 〈S0〉T 〈Si〉T<br />

(9.63)<br />

If the spins <strong>at</strong> site 0 and site i are uncorrel<strong>at</strong>ed, Γi = 0. This spin-correl<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

function can also be expressed in terms of real coordin<strong>at</strong>es r, as long as we<br />

understand th<strong>at</strong> the value Γ(r, T ) is actually an average over a number of <strong>at</strong>omic<br />

sites in a volume ∆V which is small compared to the total volume of the crystal.<br />

In th<strong>at</strong> case we find<br />

<br />

χ = β d 3 rΓ(r, T ) (9.64)<br />

If for large values of r the spin-correl<strong>at</strong>ion function is proportional to r −p the<br />

integral is well-defined only if p > 3. Therefore, <strong>at</strong> Tc where the spin-correl<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

function diverges we need to have p 3. At temper<strong>at</strong>ures away from the critical<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure the spin correl<strong>at</strong>ion function does not diverge. If the correl<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

function would always be a power law, Γ ∝ r −p(T ) , this would imply p = 3 <strong>at</strong> the<br />

critical temper<strong>at</strong>ure, since p(T ) > 3 away from the critical point. Th<strong>at</strong> is not<br />

correct, however, because we also have an exponential factor, which disappears<br />

<strong>at</strong> the critical temper<strong>at</strong>ure. In general we write Γ ∝ r −p e −α(T )r and we use<br />

α(T ) > 0 away from the critical point and hence α(Tc) = 0. Since these are the<br />

only two possibilities and since we know from experiment th<strong>at</strong> the first one is<br />

wrong, we find th<strong>at</strong> correl<strong>at</strong>ions have to die out exponentially. The length scale<br />

corresponding to this exponential decay is called the correl<strong>at</strong>ion length, and <strong>at</strong><br />

the critical point the correl<strong>at</strong>ion length diverges and becomes infinite.<br />

If we have no correl<strong>at</strong>ions we find χ = β(< S 2 0 > −m 2 ) = β(1 − m 2 ). Here<br />

we know < S 2 0 >= 0 because the value of the spin variable is ±1 and hence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!