04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.3. CRITICAL EXPONENTS. 197<br />

9.3 Critical exponents.<br />

Most of the interesting behavior of the phase transitions occurs near the critical<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure. We have shown th<strong>at</strong> the mean field results are equivalent to the<br />

Landau theory discussed in the thermodynamics, and hence near Tc we have the<br />

magnetiz<strong>at</strong>ion proportional to the square root of Tc − T , and hence the critical<br />

exponent β is 1 in mean field theory. In the Bethe approxim<strong>at</strong>ion we have to<br />

2<br />

find the value of h ′ for temper<strong>at</strong>ures just below Tc. It turns out th<strong>at</strong> in the<br />

Bethe approxim<strong>at</strong>ion the phase transition is also second order, and hence near<br />

Tc the value of h ′ will be small. Hence we can expand the equ<strong>at</strong>ion for h ′ in<br />

terms of h ′ and we find<br />

cosh β(J + h ′ )<br />

cosh β(J − h ′ ) ≈ 1 + h′ 2β tanh βJ + (h ′ ) 2 2β 2 tanh 2 βJ + O(h ′ ) 3<br />

e 2βh′<br />

q−1 ′ 2β<br />

≈ 1 + h<br />

q − 1 + (h′ ) 2 2β2 (q − 1) 2 + O(h′ ) 3<br />

(9.38)<br />

(9.39)<br />

The condition for a phase transition is the equality of the deriv<strong>at</strong>ives <strong>at</strong><br />

h ′ = 0. This gave our self-consistency condition. If this condition is s<strong>at</strong>isfied, the<br />

second deriv<strong>at</strong>ives are also the same! It is not hard to show th<strong>at</strong> the third order<br />

deriv<strong>at</strong>ives are really different. Therefore, when h ′ is small, it is determined by<br />

h ′ 2β tanh βJ + (h ′ ) 2 2β 2 tanh 2 βJ + a(h ′ ) 3 ′ 2β<br />

= h<br />

q − 1 + (h′ ) 2 2β2 (q − 1) 2 + b(h′ ) 3<br />

(9.40)<br />

where a and b are different numbers. At the critical temper<strong>at</strong>ure h ′ = 0 is a<br />

triple solution. This has to be the case, since <strong>at</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure just below the<br />

critical temper<strong>at</strong>ure the solutions are h ′ = 0 and h ′ = ±ɛ, where ɛ is a small<br />

number. These three solutions merge together <strong>at</strong> the critical temper<strong>at</strong>ure. At<br />

a temper<strong>at</strong>ure slightly below the critical temper<strong>at</strong>ure we can write<br />

0 = h ′ (T − Tc)(c + dh ′ ) + (a − b)(h ′ ) 2<br />

(9.41)<br />

where c and d are constants. This shows th<strong>at</strong> near Tc the effective field h ′<br />

is proportional to √ Tc − T . The equ<strong>at</strong>ions in the previous chapter can be<br />

used to show th<strong>at</strong> for small values of h the magnetiz<strong>at</strong>ion m is proportional<br />

to h ′ , and hence we find th<strong>at</strong> the critical exponent β is equal to 1<br />

2 in the Bethe<br />

approxim<strong>at</strong>ion, just as it is in mean field theory.<br />

The susceptibility χ is defined by<br />

<br />

∂m<br />

χ(h, T ) =<br />

(9.42)<br />

∂h T<br />

and can be calcul<strong>at</strong>ed easily in the mean field approxim<strong>at</strong>ion from<br />

m = tanh β(qJm + h) (9.43)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!