04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.4. DENSITY-MATRIX APPROACH (BRAGG-WILLIAMS APPROXIMATION.175<br />

particular direction our extremum is a minimum, and since we only have one<br />

extremum, it is a minimum no m<strong>at</strong>ter how we make changes.<br />

Finally, we find th<strong>at</strong> the entropy is<br />

<br />

1 + m 1 + m 1 − m 1 − m<br />

S = −NkB log( ) + log( ) (8.89)<br />

2 2 2 2<br />

At this point we still have m as an unknown parameter. The thermodynamic<br />

variables which are specified are h, T, and N. The minimiz<strong>at</strong>ion needed to get<br />

to the free energy is now<br />

G(h, T ) min<br />

m<br />

<br />

− 1<br />

2 JNqm2 <br />

1 + m<br />

− hNm + NkBT log(<br />

2<br />

1 + m 1 − m<br />

) +<br />

2 2<br />

(8.90)<br />

where m is restricted between −1 and +1. The value of m which minimizes this<br />

expression is then used to construct ρ and hence ρ. Once we have the density<br />

m<strong>at</strong>rix ρ, we are able to calcul<strong>at</strong>e all thermodynamic quantities of interest.<br />

The expression above looks like Landau theory, and, of course, it is. Landau<br />

theory has indeed a very good microscopic basis. We can use any parametriz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of the density m<strong>at</strong>rix, and the Gibbs like free energy has to be the minimum<br />

as a function of these parameters. The general form of the energy then follows,<br />

and for a magnetic model takes the form above.<br />

The slope of G(T, h, N; m) as a function of m is given by<br />

∂G<br />

1<br />

(T, h, N; m) = −NqJm − Nh +<br />

∂m 2 NkBT<br />

1 + m<br />

log (8.91)<br />

1 − m<br />

At m = −1 the slope is −∞ and <strong>at</strong> m = +1 the slope is +∞. Hence<br />

G(T, h, N; m) always has <strong>at</strong> least one minimum as a function of m for a value<br />

of m between −1 and +1. The value of m is found by equ<strong>at</strong>ing the deriv<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

of G to zero, which yields<br />

<br />

mqJ + h 1 + m<br />

= log<br />

(8.92)<br />

kBT 1 − m<br />

It is not hard<br />

<br />

to show th<strong>at</strong> this is equivalent to m = tanhβ(qJm + h). If we<br />

1+m<br />

have y = log 1−m we have (1 − m)e2y = 1 + m, and e2y − 1 = m(e2y + 1), or<br />

ey − e−y = m(ey + e−y ).<br />

If there is only one solution, this has to be the minimum value of G according<br />

to our observ<strong>at</strong>ion of the values of the deriv<strong>at</strong>ives <strong>at</strong> the end-points. Since the<br />

deriv<strong>at</strong>ive of G with respect to m is a continuous function of m we are also<br />

able to deduce th<strong>at</strong> there has to be an odd number of extrema between −1 and<br />

+1 due to the values of the slopes <strong>at</strong> the end-points. They have to be ordered<br />

minimum..maximum..minimum etc. Of course, one can always check this by<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ing the second deriv<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

∂2G NkBT<br />

= −NqJ +<br />

∂m2 1 − m2 log(<br />

(8.93)<br />

<br />

1 − m<br />

)<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!