04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172 CHAPTER 8. MEAN FIELD THEORY: CRITICAL TEMPERATURE.<br />

but now restrict ourselves to density m<strong>at</strong>rices ρ = (ρ) N , where the power means<br />

a direct product and where we use the three parameters a and m as defined<br />

before. This leads to<br />

G(h, T ) min<br />

m,a Tr (ρ) N H − (ρ) N hM + kBT (ρ) N log((ρ) N ) <br />

(8.70)<br />

and this procedure gives an upper bound to the energy. Note th<strong>at</strong> this does not<br />

give any bounds on deriv<strong>at</strong>ives. But we know th<strong>at</strong> deriv<strong>at</strong>ives are monotonous,<br />

and hence we cannot have large oscill<strong>at</strong>ions in them. Therefore, deriv<strong>at</strong>ives have<br />

errors similar to the errors in the free energy!<br />

The energy U − Mh is calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from Tr (H − hM)ρ, which becomes<br />

U − Mh = <br />

· · · <br />

⎡<br />

ρ(σ1, σ1) · · · ρ(σN , σN) ⎣−J <br />

σiσj − h <br />

σ1<br />

σN<br />

<br />

i<br />

σi<br />

⎤<br />

⎦ (8.71)<br />

A given variable σj occurs only in a linear fashion in this summ<strong>at</strong>ion, and<br />

hence the sums over<br />

<br />

the spin-variables either give a factor one or m, because<br />

ρ(σ, σ) = 1 and σ σρ(σ, σ) = m. This leads to<br />

<br />

σ<br />

U − Mh = − 1<br />

2 JNqm2 − hNm (8.72)<br />

as expected. This expression is independent of the values of the complex number<br />

a.<br />

The harder task is to evalu<strong>at</strong>e the entropy, because it has the logarithm of<br />

a m<strong>at</strong>rix in the expression.<br />

The entropy can be obtained from<br />

S = −kB<br />

<br />

<br />

σ1,···,σN σ ′ 1 ,···,σ′ N<br />

< σ1, · · · , σN|ρ|σ ′ 1, · · · , σ ′ N >< σ ′ 1, · · · , σ ′ N| log ρ|σ1, · · · , σN ><br />

(8.73)<br />

So how does one calcul<strong>at</strong>e the logarithm of a m<strong>at</strong>rix? The final result is not<br />

too surprising, it looks like log(xy) = log(x) + log(y), but here we work with<br />

m<strong>at</strong>rices in stead of numbers, so we have to be a little careful. In our case we<br />

define N additional m<strong>at</strong>rices rel<strong>at</strong>ed to ρ by<br />

< σ1, · · · , σN|Rn|σ ′ 1, · · · , σ ′ N >= δσ1,σ ′ 1 δσ2,σ ′ 2 · · · ρ(σn, σn) · · · (8.74)<br />

which is diagonal except for the n-th spin variable. Hence ρ = R1R2 · · · RN<br />

where all the m<strong>at</strong>rices are of rank 2N . These m<strong>at</strong>rices commute, since the off<br />

diagonal elements occur on different blocks th<strong>at</strong> are not connected. So we have<br />

[Ri, Rj] = 0.<br />

The exponent of a m<strong>at</strong>rix is defined via a power-series as usual, eA <br />

=<br />

n 1<br />

n! An , and the logarithm is the inverse of the exponential, eA = B ⇒

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!