Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University
Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University
Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.1. FERMIONS IN A BOX. 93<br />
T ′ m T Tm we can choose a range of volumes so th<strong>at</strong> the series converges<br />
uniformly and is arbitrarily close to the integral, with an error independent of<br />
the values of µ and T . Therefore, we can replace the series by the integral for<br />
all such values of µ and T , and if the volume is arbitrarily large, the error is<br />
arbitrarily small in a uniform manner. As a result, the thermodynamic limit,<br />
which we need to take <strong>at</strong> the end, will not change the results from wh<strong>at</strong> we<br />
obtained by using the integral.<br />
There are still three problem areas. Wh<strong>at</strong> if µ → ∞? Wh<strong>at</strong> if T → 0? Wh<strong>at</strong><br />
if T → ∞? The last case is the easiest. If the temper<strong>at</strong>ure is very large, the<br />
series is very close to the integral for all volumes th<strong>at</strong> are larger than a certain<br />
value and all values of µ in the range −∞ µ µm. The l<strong>at</strong>ter is true, since<br />
the values of the second order deriv<strong>at</strong>ive which determine the error are largest<br />
<strong>at</strong> µm, and hence this value can be used for uniform convergence criteria. The<br />
limit T → 0 is very important and will be discussed after the next paragraph.<br />
Wh<strong>at</strong> about µ → ∞? It turns out th<strong>at</strong> this limit is equal to the limit of<br />
infinite density. Although we often do calcul<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong> large densities, this limit<br />
is not of physical interest since the behavior of the system will be very different<br />
from wh<strong>at</strong> we are interested in.<br />
There is, however, one more detail. If we replace the summ<strong>at</strong>ion by an<br />
integral, the error is also proportional to the value of the second order deriv<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
of the function somewhere in the interval. If this second order deriv<strong>at</strong>ive is<br />
bounded, there is no problem. If it can go to infinity, there is a problem. As we<br />
will see, for fermions there are no problems. But it is good to address this issue<br />
for fermions, because after this we will study bosons where there are problems<br />
with replacing the sum by an integral. The resulting errors do show up in<br />
physics, and are the cause of Bose-Einstein condens<strong>at</strong>ion!<br />
The function in the integrant is<br />
log(1 + λe − 2 k 2<br />
2Mk B T ) (5.16)<br />
and is smoothly decaying. The largest order deriv<strong>at</strong>ives are when k → 0 and are<br />
inversely proportional to the temper<strong>at</strong>ure. So the only problem area is when<br />
T → 0. In this limit the series has no convergence properties, but we need to<br />
investig<strong>at</strong>e whether the series converges to the value of the integral. In this<br />
limit the first few terms are so important, th<strong>at</strong> they determine the behavior of<br />
the series.<br />
The argument of the summ<strong>at</strong>ion drops from a value of log(1 + e µ<br />
k B T ) <strong>at</strong> the<br />
origin of k-space to 0 <strong>at</strong> infinity. When T is very small, though, the value of the<br />
logarithm near the origin becomes very large, and it seems th<strong>at</strong> we need a very<br />
dense mesh in k-space to be able to convert the series to an integral with a small<br />
error. Hence one should take the limit V → ∞ before the limit T → 0, which<br />
is not the correct procedure. For fermions this turns out not to be necessary.<br />
Because the series converges uniformly we are able to interchange summ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
and limit and find