04.08.2013 Views

Nonlinear Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Nonlinear Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Nonlinear Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.2. GENERALIZED COORDINATES AND THE LAGRANGIAN 7<br />

These coordin<strong>at</strong>e systems conceal a subtle point: the pendulum moves<br />

in a circular arc and the block moves in a straight line because they are<br />

acted on by forces of constraint. In most cases we are not interested in these<br />

forces. Our choice of coordin<strong>at</strong>es simply makes them disappear from the<br />

problem. Most problems don’t have obvious symmetries, however. Consider<br />

a bead sliding along a wire following some complic<strong>at</strong>ed snaky p<strong>at</strong>h in 3-d<br />

space. There’s only one degree of freedom, since the particle’s position<br />

is determined entirely by its distance measured along the wire from some<br />

reference point. The forces are so complic<strong>at</strong>ed, however, th<strong>at</strong> it is out of<br />

the question to solve the problem by using F = ma in any straightforward<br />

way. This is the problem th<strong>at</strong> Lagrangian mechanics is designed to handle.<br />

The basic (and quite profound) idea is th<strong>at</strong> even though there may be no<br />

coordin<strong>at</strong>e system (in the usual sense) th<strong>at</strong> will reduce the dimensionality of<br />

the problem, yet there is usually a system of coordin<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> will do this.<br />

Such coordin<strong>at</strong>es are called generalized coordin<strong>at</strong>es.<br />

To be more specific, suppose th<strong>at</strong> a system consists of N point masses<br />

with positions specified by ordinary three-dimensional cartesian vectors, ri,<br />

i = 1 · · · N, subject to some constraints. The easiest constraints to deal with<br />

are those th<strong>at</strong> can be expressed as a set of l equ<strong>at</strong>ions of the form<br />

fj(r1, r2, . . . , t) = 0, (1.2)<br />

where j = 1 · · · l. Such constraints are said to be holonomic. If in addition,<br />

the equ<strong>at</strong>ions of constraint do not involve time explicitly, they are said to be<br />

scleronomous, otherwise they are called rheonomous. These constraints can<br />

be used to reduce the 3N cartesian components to a set of 3N − l variables<br />

q1, q2, . . . , q3N−l. The rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between the two is given by a set of N<br />

equ<strong>at</strong>ions of the form<br />

ri = ri(q1, q2, . . . , q3N−l, t). (1.3)<br />

The q’s used in this way are the generalized coordin<strong>at</strong>es. In the example of<br />

the bead on a curved wire, the equ<strong>at</strong>ions would reduce to r = r(q), where<br />

q is a distance measured along the wire. This simply specifies the curv<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

of the wire.<br />

It should be noted th<strong>at</strong> the q’s need not all have the same units. Also<br />

note th<strong>at</strong> we can use the same not<strong>at</strong>ion even if there are no constraints.<br />

For example, the position of an unconstrained particle could be written r =<br />

r(q1, q2, q3), and the q’s might represent cartesian, spherical, or cylindrical<br />

coordin<strong>at</strong>es. In order to simplify the not<strong>at</strong>ion, we will often pack the q’s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!