04.08.2013 Views

Ringpi - Ministry of Power

Ringpi - Ministry of Power

Ringpi - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER<br />

I<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

DESCRIPTION<br />

Executive Summary<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35MW)<br />

PAGE NO.<br />

1-10<br />

II Background Information 11-18<br />

III Project Area 19-25<br />

IV Topographical & Geo-technical Aspects 26-33<br />

V Hydrology 34-56<br />

VI Conceptual Layout and Planning 57-67<br />

VII <strong>Power</strong> Potential Studies 68-100<br />

VIII <strong>Power</strong> Evacuation 101<br />

IX Environmental Aspects 102-121<br />

X Infrastructure 122-125<br />

XI Construction Planning & Schedule 126-131<br />

XII Cost Estimate 132-168<br />

XIII Economic Evaluation 169-176<br />

Plates<br />

Annexures


TITLE<br />

LIST OF PLATES<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35MW)<br />

PLATE<br />

No.<br />

Preliminary Ranking Study Layout 1<br />

Cascade Development <strong>of</strong> Teesta River Basin 2<br />

Layout Plan <strong>of</strong> Schemes in Upper Part <strong>of</strong> Teesta Basin 3<br />

Cascade Development <strong>of</strong> Tolung River Basin 4<br />

Geological Plan <strong>of</strong> The Project Area 4.1<br />

Vicinity Map 6.1<br />

Layout Plan 6.2<br />

Dam Area Layout Plan 6.3<br />

<strong>Power</strong> House Area Layout Plan 6.4<br />

Water Conductor System L-Section 6.5<br />

Dam Upstream Elevation 6.6<br />

Dam: Spillway & Non-Overflow Cross Section 6.7<br />

Typical Cross Section Of Constituents Of Water<br />

Conductor System & Diversion Tunnel<br />

Single Line Diagram – <strong>Power</strong> Evacuation 8.1<br />

6.8


TITLE<br />

ANNEXURES<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35MW)<br />

No.<br />

Geology <strong>of</strong> the Area Around the Project- By G SI 4.1<br />

Technical Report on Seismic History and<br />

Seismicity- By IMD<br />

4.2<br />

Preliminary Ranking Study Report- By CEA 6.1<br />

Record note <strong>of</strong> discussions on conceptual layout <strong>of</strong><br />

the project.<br />

6.2<br />

Reply on CEA/CWC Comments on Draft PFR 6.3


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – I<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


1.0 INTRODUCTION<br />

CHAPTER-I<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

1<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The <strong>Ringpi</strong> Hydroelectric Project located in North Sikkim district <strong>of</strong> Sikkim envisages<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> the waters <strong>of</strong> the river <strong>Ringpi</strong> a tributary <strong>of</strong> river Rangyong for power<br />

generation on a run <strong>of</strong> river type development, harnessing a gross head <strong>of</strong> about 1110m.<br />

The project with a proposed installation <strong>of</strong> 70MW (2 x 35 MW) would afford an annual<br />

energy generation <strong>of</strong> 317.41 GWh in a 90% dependable year. The tariff from the project<br />

at present day cost would be Rs.2.93 per KWh(levellised).<br />

The diversion site is located at Latitude 27º40’35” North, Longitude 88º26’39” East. The<br />

dam site is approachable from road head ending at Lingza by a footpath <strong>of</strong> about 16 km<br />

length. The <strong>Power</strong> house site is approachable by a foot path <strong>of</strong> about 6.0 km length from<br />

road head at Lingza and about 17 km by road from Mangan, the head quarter <strong>of</strong> North<br />

Sikkim district. The nearest railhead is at New Jalpaiguri and airport at Bagdogra.<br />

1.1 GENERAL PROJECT FEATURES<br />

The <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project envisages construction <strong>of</strong> :<br />

• a 40 m high concrete Dam across river <strong>Ringpi</strong> to provide a live storage <strong>of</strong> 0.567<br />

mcum. with FRL at 2966m and MDDL at 2963m;<br />

• one intake and one desilting chamber <strong>of</strong> size 50m(L)x5m(W)x7.5m(H) to remove<br />

silt particles <strong>of</strong> size 0.2mm and above;<br />

• a 7 km long , 3.3m diameter head race tunnel terminating in a surge shaft;<br />

• a 50m high, 10m dia surge shaft;<br />

• 1750m long, 1.5m dia one pressure shaft;


2<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

• an underground power house having an installation <strong>of</strong> 2 Vertical Pelton turbine<br />

generating units <strong>of</strong> 35 MW each operating under a net head <strong>of</strong> 1106m; and<br />

• 250m long, 3.3m diameter tailrace tunnel to carry the power house release back to<br />

the river;<br />

The power generated from the project would be evacuated through one number 220KV<br />

double circuit lines to a proposed pooling station near Teesta(II) HE Project to feed<br />

power to the national grid.<br />

The salient features <strong>of</strong> the projects are as under;<br />

LOCATION<br />

SALIENT FEATURES<br />

State Sikkim<br />

District North Sikkim<br />

River <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu<br />

Location <strong>of</strong> Dam Site Just d/s <strong>of</strong> confluence <strong>of</strong> Jhumthul Chu<br />

Location <strong>of</strong> <strong>Power</strong> house<br />

and Kishong Chu<br />

Just u/s <strong>of</strong> reservoir <strong>of</strong> Lingza<br />

H.E. Scheme<br />

Nearest Rail head New Jalpaiguri<br />

Nearest Airport Bagdogra<br />

Latitude <strong>of</strong> dam & <strong>Power</strong> house 27º40’35’’& 27º36’21’’<br />

Longitude <strong>of</strong> dam & <strong>Power</strong> house 88º26’39’’& 88º27’09’’<br />

HYDROLOGY<br />

Catchment area 126 km 2


Design Flood (PMF) 675 m 3 /sec<br />

DIVERSION TUNNEL<br />

Diameter & Shape 3.3 m, Horse-shoe shaped<br />

Length 400 m<br />

Diversion Discharge ±100 m 3 /sec<br />

Diversion Tunnel Gate 1 No. Vertical lift gate<br />

Size <strong>of</strong> Gate 3.3 m × 4 m<br />

COFFER DAMS<br />

Type Rockfill with central clay core.<br />

Maximum height <strong>of</strong> upstream c<strong>of</strong>fer dam ± 15.0 m<br />

Maximum height <strong>of</strong> downstream c<strong>of</strong>fer<br />

dam<br />

DAM<br />

3<br />

± 8.0 m<br />

Type Concrete Gravity<br />

Dam Top EL. 2970.0 m<br />

River bed level at dam site EL.2940.0 m<br />

Maximum Dam height (above deepest<br />

foundation level)<br />

40 m<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> the Dam 300 m<br />

Dam height (above River bed level) 30 m<br />

SPILLWAY<br />

Type Orifice Type<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> bays 3<br />

Crest level <strong>of</strong> spillway EL. 2950.0 m<br />

Size <strong>of</strong> the opening 4m(w) X 7m(H)<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)


Design flood (PMF) 675 m 3 /sec<br />

RESERVOIR<br />

Full Reservoir Level (FRL) EL.2966.0 m<br />

Minimum draw down level (MDDL) EL.2963.0 m<br />

Area under submergence at FRL 12.70 Ha<br />

Gross Storage 1.856 MCM<br />

Live Storage 0.567 MCM<br />

INTAKE<br />

Number One<br />

Invert level EL.2955.0 m<br />

Size <strong>of</strong> each Gate 3.3 m × 3.3 m<br />

4<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Trash Rack Steel Trash Racks with Raking Machine<br />

Design discharge 8.68 m 3 /sec<br />

DESILTING ARRANGEMENT<br />

No., Type & size <strong>of</strong> desilting chamber 1 Nos.,Dufour type chamber 50 m long, 5<br />

m x 7.5m<br />

Total Design Discharge 8.68 m 3 /sec<br />

Particle size to be removed ≥ 0.2 mm (90% efficiency)<br />

SILT FLUSHING TUNNEL<br />

Size & shape 0.75 m x 1.5 m , D-shaped


HEADRACE TUNNEL<br />

5<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Size & type 3.3 m Dia, Horse –shoe shaped, concrete<br />

lined<br />

Design discharge 7.24 m 3 /sec<br />

Length 7 Km<br />

Adits 3 No.; 3.3 m D-shaped<br />

SURGE SHAFT<br />

Size & type 10m diameter<br />

Vertical Shaft height 50 m<br />

PRESSURE SHAFT<br />

Type Steel Lined; one, Inclined<br />

Diameter 1.5 m<br />

Length 1750 m<br />

Adits 2 Nos. <strong>of</strong> dia. 3.3m<br />

POWER HOUSE COMPLEX<br />

Type Under ground<br />

Tail water level at outlet 1853 m<br />

Turbine Axis Elevation 1854.63 M<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Turbine Vertical axis Pelton<br />

Generating Capacity 2 X 35 MW<br />

Gross head 1110.37 m<br />

Rated Net head 1106.37 m<br />

Design Discharge 7.24 m 3 /sec<br />

<strong>Power</strong> House Size 72 m X 18m X 35m


TRT<br />

Diameter and type 3.3m dia, Horse-shoe<br />

Length 250 m<br />

Tail Water level at outlet 1853m<br />

SWITCH YARD<br />

Size 150M X 115M<br />

POWER GENERATION<br />

Installed Capacity 70MW (2 x 35MW)<br />

Annual Energy Generation in a 90%<br />

dependable year<br />

6<br />

317.41MU<br />

COST ESTIMATES & FIANANCIAL ASPECTS ( Rs. Crores)<br />

Civil Works 363.00<br />

Electro Mechanical Works 83.88<br />

Sub Total (Generation) 446.88<br />

Transmission Works 19.16<br />

Total (Hard Cost) 466.04 at June,2003 Price Level<br />

Interest During Construction 53.23<br />

Grand Total 519.27<br />

Tariff for first year per KWh<br />

a. with 12% free power<br />

b. without 12% free power<br />

Levellised Tariff per KWh<br />

a. with 12% free power<br />

b. without free power<br />

Rs. 3.61<br />

Rs. 3.17<br />

Rs. 2.93<br />

Rs. 2.58<br />

COSTRUCTION PERIOD 4 years<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)


1.2 STUDIES/INVESTIGATIONS UNDERTAKEN<br />

• Study <strong>of</strong> topographic maps and remote sensing imageries<br />

7<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

• Reconnaissance <strong>of</strong> area for identifying probable alternative sites <strong>of</strong> projects<br />

components.<br />

• Study <strong>of</strong> regional geotechnical features/ seimotectonic aspects.<br />

• Geological appraisal <strong>of</strong> proposed project components.<br />

• Water availability design flood studies based on available meteorological/<br />

hydrological data.<br />

• Conceptual layout and project planning.<br />

• <strong>Power</strong> potential studies.<br />

• Study <strong>of</strong> biotic environment, socio-economic environment for prediction <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the projects.<br />

• Study <strong>of</strong> existing infrastructure.<br />

• Cost benefit and economic evaluation.<br />

1.3 RESULTS OF STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS<br />

1.3.1 Geology<br />

The preliminary geological survey <strong>of</strong> the locations <strong>of</strong> all the structures on the ground was<br />

carried out after site visits. The site-specific geological data were got collected and<br />

utilized in the design <strong>of</strong> various component <strong>of</strong> the project. The survey <strong>of</strong> the near by area<br />

was also carried out to co-relate the geology <strong>of</strong> the project area. The underground<br />

powerhouse has been fixed after observing the competency <strong>of</strong> rock and its cover.<br />

1.3.2 Hydrology<br />

The river <strong>Ringpi</strong> drains a catchment area <strong>of</strong> about 126 sq.km at the proposed dam site.<br />

The water availability for the project has been considered on the basis <strong>of</strong> 10-daily<br />

discharge series at Lachen for the period from 1976-1997. The water availability at the<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> dam site has been derived from the above data on the basis <strong>of</strong> catchment area


8<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

proportion and applying an overall reduction factor <strong>of</strong> 22 %. The computed inflow series<br />

works out has been utilized for <strong>Power</strong> Potential Studies. The design flood has been<br />

assessed as 675 cumecs.<br />

1.3.3 <strong>Power</strong> Potential Studies<br />

The computed inflow series for 21 years viz June 1976 to May 97 has been considered in<br />

the assessment <strong>of</strong> a power benefits from the project. As per GOI notification for tariff the<br />

year 1976-77 corresponds to 90% dependable year. An installation <strong>of</strong> 70 MW comprising<br />

2 generating units <strong>of</strong> 35 MW has been proposed. The energy availability from the project<br />

in a 90%dependable and an average year has been summarized below:<br />

Annual Energy Generation<br />

Annual Energy Generation (GWh) 317.41<br />

Annual Load Factor (%) 51.76<br />

Generation during Lean Flow Season (SeptII – JuneI)<br />

Energy Output (GWh) 170.58<br />

Load Factor (%) 37.19<br />

The design energy for tariff at 95% availability in a 90% dependable year has been<br />

worked out at 317.41 GWh.<br />

A pondage <strong>of</strong> 0.567 mcum has been provided in the diversion dam, which would enable<br />

the station to operate as peaking station. The pondage is equivalent to 1521.92 MWh<br />

which sufficient to operate the station for 4 hours.<br />

1.3.4 <strong>Power</strong> Evacuation Aspects<br />

The power generated from the project would be evacuated through 220KV, double circuit<br />

lines to a pooling station proposed near Teesta (II) HE Project to feed into the Grid which<br />

in turn connected to National Grid.


1.3.5 Environmental Aspects<br />

9<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The project is located in north district <strong>of</strong> Sikkim. The total land requirement for the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> various components is about 149.00 ha. Most <strong>of</strong> the land falls under the<br />

category <strong>of</strong> private land. Based on assessment <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts, management<br />

plans have to be formulated for Catchment Area Treatment, compensatory afforestation<br />

and other environmental issues. These issues would be addressed during the investigation<br />

for DPR.<br />

1.3.6 Estimates Of The Cost<br />

The project is estimated to cost Rs.519.27 crores including IDC at June, 2003 price<br />

levels. The preliminary cost estimate <strong>of</strong> the project has been prepared as per guidelines <strong>of</strong><br />

CEA/CWC. The break down <strong>of</strong> the cost estimate (Rs. Crores) is given below:<br />

Civil works : 363.00<br />

Electro Mechanical Works : 83.88<br />

Sub Total (Generation) : 446.88<br />

Transmission Works : 19.16<br />

Total (Hard Cost) : 466.04<br />

Interest During Construction : 53.23<br />

Grand Total 519.27<br />

1.4 FINANCIAL ASPECTS<br />

As indicated above, the <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE project with an estimated cost <strong>of</strong> Rs. 519.27crores<br />

(including IDC <strong>of</strong> Rs 53.23 crores) and design energy <strong>of</strong> 317.41GWh in a 90%<br />

dependable year is proposed to be completed in a period <strong>of</strong> 4 years. The tariff has been<br />

worked out considering a debt-equity ratio <strong>of</strong> 70:30, 16% return on equity, and annual<br />

interest rate on loan at 10% and 12% <strong>of</strong> energy as free power to Home State available<br />

after losses. The tariff for the first year and levellised tariff has been worked out<br />

Rs. 3.61 /KWh & Rs. 2.93/KWh respectively.


1.3.8 Conclusion<br />

10<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE project involves simple civil works and could be completed in 4 years.<br />

The project would afford design energy <strong>of</strong> 317.41 GWh in a 90% dependable year. The<br />

cost per MW installed capacity works out Rs.6.38 crores. The Preliminary Feasibility<br />

Report indicates that the scheme merit consideration for taking up for Survey &<br />

Investigation and preparation <strong>of</strong> DPR.


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – II<br />

BACKGROUND INFORMATION


2.1 GENERAL INFORMATION<br />

2.1.1 Introduction<br />

CHAPTER –II<br />

BACKGROUND INFORMATION<br />

11<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Sikkim has elected to join the Indian Union to become 22 nd state in 1975; It is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most picturesque regions <strong>of</strong> Asia. The bowl like, mountain –girdled state in the eastern<br />

Himalayas bordered on the west by Nepal, on the north by Tibet, on the east by Bhutan<br />

and the south by Darjeeling district <strong>of</strong> the West Bengal, lies between 27 0 to 28 0 north<br />

latitude and 88 0 to 89 0 east longitudes. The Sikkim is the youngest and small hill state <strong>of</strong><br />

India having an area <strong>of</strong> 7096 Sqkm. Sikkim is surrounded by important mountain ranges.<br />

The chola range <strong>of</strong> mountains on its east forms the watershed between it and Bhutan on<br />

one side and chumbi valley <strong>of</strong> Tibet on the other. The well-known singalila ridge is <strong>of</strong> the<br />

great Himalayas peaks.<br />

Sikkim is divided into four districts. The most populated area is the Eastern district,<br />

which contains the capital town Gangtok followed by Southern and Western districts.<br />

The northern district is sparsely populated because <strong>of</strong> its inhospitable climate and steep<br />

ridges. Lying along the slopes <strong>of</strong> Himalayas between Tibet and plain <strong>of</strong> India, cut <strong>of</strong>f<br />

from the rest <strong>of</strong> the world by mighty mountains, Sikkim’s scenic beauty has no parallel in<br />

the East Sikkim’s historic past, mystic religion, sublime monasteries and age old rituals<br />

have an attraction hardly to be found anywhere else in the world.<br />

Sikkim is mountainous terrain with cliffs and valleys. Dominating both legend and<br />

landscape is the mighty massif <strong>of</strong> Kanchendzonga known to the outside world as<br />

Kanchenjunga, it is the third highest peak in the world, towering at 8550 meters. Sikkim<br />

is drained by number <strong>of</strong> Perennial Rivers. However, the two main river systems are<br />

Teesta and Rangit. The other entire stream eventually joins one or the other. Rangit also<br />

joins the Teesta just near the border between Sikkim and West Bengal at Melli. Besides


12<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

the river, there are number <strong>of</strong> lakes and hot springs which add to the beauty <strong>of</strong> the region.<br />

The important hot springs are Phut sachu, Raeong sachu, Yumthang and Momay.<br />

2.1.2 Topography<br />

Geographical area <strong>of</strong> Sikkim State is about 7300 sq. km. The maximum horizontal length<br />

from north to south is about 112 Km. whereas the maximum width from east to west is 90<br />

Km. The Tibetan Plateau on the north, Nathula and other passes on the north east, Bhutan<br />

on the south east, Darjeeling district <strong>of</strong> West Bengal on the south and Singalila range <strong>of</strong><br />

Nepal from the boundaries <strong>of</strong> this picturesque Himalayan State. It is a hill state having no<br />

plain area. The altitude above mean sea level varies from 213m in the south to over<br />

8500m in the northwest. The Khangchedzonga, the third highest peak in the world at an<br />

elevation <strong>of</strong> about 8550m adorns the state with its beautiful range covered with shining<br />

snow. Gangtok, the capital is about 1677m above mean sea level. The northern part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

state is cut into deep escarpments. The northern part is not populated except in Lachung<br />

and Lachen valleys. Southern Sikkim is, however, more open and fairly well cultivated.<br />

2.1.3 Rivers<br />

The river Teesta is one <strong>of</strong> the main Himalayan Rivers, which originates in the glaciers <strong>of</strong><br />

Sikkim at an elevation <strong>of</strong> over 8500m above mean sea level. River rises in mountainous<br />

terrain and is formed mainly by the union <strong>of</strong> two hill streams Lachen Chu and Lachung<br />

Chu at Chungthang in North Sikkim. After the confluence <strong>of</strong> Lachen Chu and Lachung<br />

chu at Chungthang, the river gradually increases in width and takes a wide flowing down<br />

to Singhik, dropping in elevation from 1550m to 750m. At Singhik, the river receives one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the its major tributaries, the Talung chu on its right. Tolung Chu originates from the<br />

Talung glaciers, which are the part <strong>of</strong> the Khangchendzonga range. From Singhik, the<br />

rivers flow towards Dikchu in a very deep valley and drops from 750mto 550m. From<br />

Dikchu the river flows in a big curve again down to the Singtam with a drop <strong>of</strong> about<br />

200m. The Rongnichu, which drains the Changu lake area joins Teesta from left at<br />

Singtam and the river receives Rangpo Chu at Rangpo. After Rangpo, Teesta start


13<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

widening rapidly and is joined by the great Rangit at Melli bazar on Sikkim – West<br />

Bengal border.<br />

2.1.4 Communication<br />

By Air<br />

Bagdogra is the nearest airport <strong>of</strong> Sikkim. There are regular scheduled flights operated by<br />

the Indian airlines and other private airlines between Calcutta, the capital <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />

and Bagdogra and also between New Delhi and Bagdogra. Jeep taxis are available<br />

outsides Bagdogra airport for Gangtok. Gangtok is 124 kms from Bagdogra and the<br />

journey takes about 4 hours by jeep and 5 hours by bus.<br />

By Rail /Road<br />

The two closest railway stations to Gangtok are Siliguri junction, (Meter Gauge) which is<br />

114km away and New Jailpaiguri (Broad Gauge), which is 125km away. A number <strong>of</strong><br />

trains are available for Calcutta, Delhi, Guwhati and other important cities <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

Besides jeep taxis, Sikkim National Transport and other private buses ply regularly<br />

between Sikkim and Siliguri.<br />

2.1.5 The Project<br />

2.1.5.1 Background<br />

In order to exploit vast hydro potential in the country and to achieve the ideal hydro<br />

thermal mix <strong>of</strong> 40:60, the Honourable Prime Minister <strong>of</strong> India had launched a hydro-<br />

electric initiative on 24th May 2003 to develop 50,000MW hydro power potential in the<br />

country. Accordingly, based on the results <strong>of</strong> the preliminary ranking studies <strong>of</strong> Central<br />

Electricity Authority, 162 hydroelectric power schemes with estimated installed capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> 50,560MW were selected in 16 states for preparation <strong>of</strong> Pre Feasibility Reports. The<br />

work <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> PFR’s was entrusted by <strong>Ministry</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Power</strong> under overall<br />

coordination <strong>of</strong> CEA to NHPC Ltd, SJVN Ltd, NEEPCO, WAPCOS, KPCL, HPSEB and<br />

UJVN Ltd as consultancy work. NHPC was entrusted a total number <strong>of</strong> 43 schemes <strong>of</strong>


14<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

21345 MW comprising <strong>of</strong> 7 schemes in Indus-Jhelam Basin J&K, 25 schemes in Dihang-<br />

Dibang-Subansiri Basins Arunachal Pradesh, 1 scheme in Narmada Basin Madhya<br />

Pradesh and 10 schemes in Teesta Basin Sikkim. The <strong>Ringpi</strong> is one <strong>of</strong> the such scheme<br />

for PFR.<br />

2.1.5.2 About The Project<br />

The project is located on the river <strong>Ringpi</strong> chu in Dzongu area <strong>of</strong> North district <strong>of</strong><br />

Sikkim. The headquarter <strong>of</strong> the district North Sikkim is at Mangan. The project involves<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> a 40m high concrete dam, a 7.0 Km long headrace tunnel and an<br />

underground powerhouse with an installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 70 MW. The project shall generate<br />

317.41 MU <strong>of</strong> energy in a 90% dependable year. The dam site is located just d/s <strong>of</strong> the<br />

confluence <strong>of</strong> river Jhumthul Chu and Kishong Chu. The underground powerhouse is<br />

located u/s the dam <strong>of</strong> proposed Lingza HE project. The village Lingza, nearest to<br />

<strong>Power</strong> house site, is connected by a foot path <strong>of</strong> 6 Km from road end at Lingza which is<br />

17 km from Mangan.<br />

2.2 POWER SCENARIO AND EXISTING INSTALLATION<br />

2.2.1 <strong>Power</strong> System In India<br />

The <strong>Power</strong> System in India has grown from small, isolated stations, serving limited<br />

consumers in and around large cities, into large regional <strong>Power</strong> Grids. The generating<br />

capacity installed in the country has already grown to 107903.53 MW by March 2003.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> system planning and operation the country has been divided into<br />

following five geopolitical regions: Northern, Western, Southern, Eastern and North-<br />

Eastern regional power grids and the transmission system are being progressively inter-<br />

connected for efficient operation <strong>of</strong> these five regional grids.<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> the system development is to evolve self-sufficient regional grid catering<br />

to the individual regional power demands. It is also aimed at achieving the maximum


15<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

benefits from integrated operation, through a proper mix <strong>of</strong> thermal and hydro generation<br />

and ultimately to tie the five regional grids together to form a strong National <strong>Power</strong><br />

Gird, providing even greater reliability.<br />

The proposed <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project located in north Sikkim is envisaged to be connected to<br />

feed the power at a pooling station near Teesta(II) HE Project through one number<br />

220KV double circuit lines.<br />

2.2.2 <strong>Power</strong> Position in North Sikkim Region.<br />

The total installed capacity in Eastern Region is 16696.68 MW.Out <strong>of</strong> this only 2459.51<br />

MW is hydel installation. Thus the hydro thermal mix is 15:85, which is well below the<br />

national average <strong>of</strong> 25:75 and desirable ratio <strong>of</strong> 40:60.<br />

The power supply position for Eastern region during 10 th and 11 th Five Year Plans is<br />

summarized in Table2.1. The power and energy availability and requirements during and<br />

after 10 th Plan period in the Eastern Region is shown in Tables as projected in the 16 th<br />

Electric <strong>Power</strong> Survey, published by CEA.<br />

Even considering the coordinated operation <strong>of</strong> existing hydro and thermal stations, as<br />

well as benefits from ongoing projects and also from the schemes cleared by CEA, the<br />

Eastern region is expected to face peak power and energy deficits during most <strong>of</strong> the 10 th<br />

five Year Plan. The power situation in the region is dynamic and it is expected that the<br />

power generated from this project shall be cheap and helpful to the region as compared to<br />

thermal and other expensive power in the region.<br />

2.2.3 Existing <strong>Power</strong> Installations In Sikkim<br />

First time, a micro hydel station was established in Sikkim on the bank <strong>of</strong> Ranikhola at<br />

Lower Sichey Busty with an installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 10 KW on 27 th May 1927 for the needs<br />

<strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the Royal family and Gangtok. Later, Lower Lagyap Hydel Project


16<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

with an installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 12MW was constructed by Govt. <strong>of</strong> Sikkim and this was a<br />

big boom. Presently following hydel schemes totaling 95.70MW are under operation in<br />

the state.<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Hydel Schemes Year <strong>of</strong><br />

Completion<br />

Installed<br />

Capacities<br />

Firm<br />

Capacity<br />

(MW) (MW)<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

1 Jali <strong>Power</strong> House 1966 2.10 1.20<br />

2 Rothak Micro Hydel 1971-72 0.20 0.10<br />

3 Rimbi Micro Hydel, Stage-I 1970-71 0.60 0.30<br />

4 Lower Lagyap HEP 1979-80 12.00 5.50<br />

5 Lachen Micro Hydel 1989-90 0.10 0.05<br />

6 Rimbi Stage-II 1989-90 1.00 0.50<br />

7 Rongnichu Micro Hydel-II 1988-89 2.50 1.20<br />

8 Lachung Micro Hydel 1991-92 0.20 0.10<br />

9 Mayongchu 1993-94 4.00 2.00<br />

10 Upper Rongnichu HEP 1994-95 8.00 4.00<br />

11 Kalej Khola 1995-96 2.00 1.00<br />

12 Rangit Hydel Project 1999-00 60.00 20.00<br />

13 Robom Micro Hydel 2003-04 3.0 1.00<br />

I - Total Hydel <strong>Power</strong> 95.70 36.95<br />

II - Total Diesel <strong>Power</strong> 2.70 2.70<br />

Total Generation Capacity 98.40 39.65<br />

2.2.4 Load Demand & <strong>Power</strong> Position <strong>of</strong> Eastern Grid<br />

Table-2.1 shows the power supply position <strong>of</strong> Eastern grid up to 2011-12.


2.3 NECESSITY OF THE PROJECT AND RELATED ASPECTS<br />

17<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The need for <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E.Project has been considered in the context <strong>of</strong> increasing demand<br />

<strong>of</strong> power in the eastern region. It has been assumed that eastern region will have energy<br />

requirements at the rate 10% per annum rise <strong>of</strong> each year. This is a run <strong>of</strong> the river<br />

scheme in Teesta basin in North Sikkim District, Sikkim. It will generate 317.41 MU in<br />

90% dependable year (1976-77) with 95% machine availability.<br />

The power generated at <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35MW) will be fed to a a pooling station<br />

near Teesta(II) HE Project through one number 220KV double circuit lines.


Region<br />

Eastern<br />

POWER SUPPLY POSITION OF EASTERN REGION<br />

WITHOUT RINGPI HE PROJECT (70 MW)<br />

10th Plan 11th Plan<br />

18<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project, (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Table 2.1<br />

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

Installed Capacity MW 16697 17197 18327 20077 21237 22369 23269 24769 25429 26749<br />

Peak availability MW 7676 7906 8425 9230 9763 10284 10697 11387 11690 12297<br />

Peak requirement MW 8076 8527 9002 9505 10035 10586 11167 11780 12427 13109<br />

Peak Surplus(Deficit) MW -400 -621 -577 -275 -272 -302 -470 -393 -737 -812<br />

Peak Surplus(Deficit) % -4.95% -7.28% -6.41% -2.89% -2.71% -2.86% -4.21% -3.34% -5.93% -6.19%<br />

Energy availability MU 50260 51765 55167 60434 63926 67334 70043 74558 76545 80518<br />

Energy requirement MU 51653 54484 57469 60619 63941 67400 71046 74890 78941 83212<br />

Energy Surplus (Deficit) MU -1393 -2718 -2303 -184 -14 -66 -1003 -331 -2396 -2694<br />

Energy Surplus (Deficit) % -2.70% -4.99% -4.01% -0.30% -0.02% -0.10% -1.41% -0.44% -3.04% -3.24%<br />

1. All the data for the year 2002-2003 has been taken from the website www.cea.nic.in.<br />

2. Energy availability for the year 2002-2003 onwards have been estimated on the basis <strong>of</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> Energy availability to Installed capacity for the year 2002-<br />

2003.<br />

3. Peak availability for the year 2002-2003 onwards have been estimated on the basis <strong>of</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> Peak availability to installed capacity for the year 2002-2003.<br />

4. Energy requirement & peak requirement for the year 2002-2003 onwards is based on the annual increments given at page -117 & 118 <strong>of</strong> "Sixteenth Electric<br />

<strong>Power</strong> Survey Of India".<br />

5. Micro/mini projects have not been considered for the study.<br />

Note:- This is a statistical analysis based on various publications mentioned above and are meant for study and planning purposes.


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – III<br />

PROJECT AREA


CHAPTER –III<br />

PROJECT AREA<br />

3.1 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT INCLUDING RIVER SYSTEM<br />

19<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E. Project is situated in the Dzongu area <strong>of</strong> north district <strong>of</strong> Sikkim .The project<br />

envisages construction <strong>of</strong> 40 m high concrete gravity dam near the placeTolung and an<br />

under ground powerhouse near the place Ishana. The river water shall be diverted through<br />

a diversion tunnel <strong>of</strong> 400m length and 3.3 m dia for construction <strong>of</strong> dam. A headrace<br />

tunnel <strong>of</strong> 7.0 km length, 3.3m dia shall carry a discharge <strong>of</strong> 7.24 cumecs <strong>of</strong> water to the<br />

powerhouse. One number <strong>of</strong> desilting chamber <strong>of</strong> 50mX5mX7m size shall be constructed<br />

to separate the silt particles <strong>of</strong> 0.2mm size and above from the water. A surge shaft <strong>of</strong><br />

10m dia and 50m deep along with one pressure shaft <strong>of</strong> 1.50m dia 1750 m length shall be<br />

constructed. A tailrace tunnel <strong>of</strong> 250m length and 3.3 m dia shall discharge the water<br />

back into the river. A Switchyard <strong>of</strong> 150Mx115m size shall also be constructed. The<br />

powerhouse shall have installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 70 MW to generate 317.41MU <strong>of</strong> energy in a<br />

90% dependable year.<br />

The river <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu is the tributary <strong>of</strong> the Rangyong Chu originating in the glaciers <strong>of</strong><br />

North Sikkim at an elevation <strong>of</strong> about 5000 m above mean sea level. The Jumthu Chu,<br />

Dawathang Chu, Kishong Chu, Pegor Chu and Zong Chu are the main tributary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong><br />

Chu. The <strong>Ringpi</strong> is the tributary <strong>of</strong> Rangyong Chu and meets Rangyong Chu upstream <strong>of</strong><br />

the confluence <strong>of</strong> Ringyong Chu and Rangyong Chu. The other tributaries <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Rangyong Chu /Tolung Chu are Umram Chu, Passaram Chu, Rangyang Chu , Rangli<br />

Chu and Rahi Chu. Both the river Rahi Chu and Rangyong Chu meets Teesta river near<br />

village Singhik . After running about 14 Km from the confluence, the Dikchu River joins<br />

the Teesta River near the village Dikchu. In the downstream the Rongni Chu joins Teesta<br />

River at Singtam, Rangpo Chu at Rangpo and Rangit at Melli.


3.2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND OTHER ASPECTS<br />

20<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

There is no human habitation in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the proposed project site. Only a few<br />

villages under Sakyong Pentong Revenue Block fall within 10km radius <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

area. The human population as per the 1991 census up to different aerial distances from<br />

the project is given below.<br />

Up to 2 km Up to 2-5 km Up to 5-10 km<br />

1. Population Nil 199 694<br />

2. Households Nil 49 145<br />

All the land required for the project area lies in the North district <strong>of</strong> Sikkim. The land<br />

requirement for the project may include private land, marginal forestland and village<br />

forests. Most <strong>of</strong> the population in the project area comprises <strong>of</strong> Lepchas, Bhutias and<br />

Nepalese, which constitute about 85% <strong>of</strong> the population. Most <strong>of</strong> the people are tribals<br />

with little agricultural earnings being farmers with meager land holdings. Cardamom and<br />

ginger is grown at a number <strong>of</strong> places on private as well as forestlands. The families in<br />

general have a few cattle, sheep and pigs with some poultry. Most parts <strong>of</strong> the valley are<br />

inhabited with minuscule population. Yak herds, herdsmen and sheep grazers migrate in<br />

the catchment area.<br />

The existing public facilities in the project area are not sufficient. There are very low<br />

opportunities <strong>of</strong> employment in the local area. People are involved in small roadside<br />

business as kiosks selling tea, snacks, eggs, vegetables, etc. grown in the fields. The<br />

overall economic conditions are not very healthy. Jhoras (small streams) are main source<br />

<strong>of</strong> drinking water in the area. Most <strong>of</strong> the houses <strong>of</strong> the locals are kuccha.<br />

3.2.3 Health & Education<br />

There are 4 district hospitals, Gyalshing, Namchi, Singtam & Mangan and one Central<br />

Referral Hospital at Gangtok, besides 25 Primary health centers 150 Primary health sub-


21<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

centre, 9 Veterinary hospitals and 25 Veterinary dispensaries. There is a blood bank at<br />

Gangtok. There are 1234 doctors. Small pox and Kalzor have been eliminated from the<br />

state and many schemes for the provision <strong>of</strong> safe drinking water to the villages and<br />

bazars have been implemented. Sikkim has 700 Pre-nursery schools, 531Primary schools,<br />

122 Middle schools, 64 Secondary schools, and 28 Higher secondary schools 2 Public<br />

schools. There is a Training Institute for primary teachers, a Law college, a B.Ed. college,<br />

2 Degree colleges, one Industrial Training Institution, a Medical and an Engineering<br />

college.<br />

3.2.4 Religion<br />

Hinduism and Buddhism are the two main religions prevalent in Sikkim. Hindus and<br />

Buddhists constitute 99 percent <strong>of</strong> the population; Christians, Muslims, Jains and Sikhs<br />

together are less than one per cent.<br />

3.2.5 Trade & Industry<br />

Sikkim has a State Industrial Development Investment Corporation, which is encouraging<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> industrial units in Sikkim. The Industrial Training Institute located at<br />

Rangpo is providing necessary expertise to the younger people for self-independence in<br />

the trade and the know-how. Sikkim has two distilleries , one tannery, and other ancillary<br />

units. Rangpo area has been declared as an industrial Zone. A Brewery is located at<br />

Melli, South Sikkim. and another at Rangpo, East Sikkim. There is also a fruit<br />

preservation factory at Singtam. The Sikkim Mining Corporation mines copper, zinc, lead<br />

etc in the state. The Sikkim Time Corporation a watch-manufacturing factory is located at<br />

Gangtok, which is producing one <strong>of</strong> the latest watches in India. There is a jewel factory<br />

located at Gangtok. Besides the above a good number <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurs have recently<br />

proposed to set up new factories. Some <strong>of</strong> the units are manufacturing leather goods,<br />

safety matches, local crafts, carpet weaving, handmade paper, woodcarving and similar<br />

works. The Sikkim State Tea Board has also been established for quality tea production.


3.2.6 Natural Resources<br />

22<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Sikkim is gifted with abundant natural resources. The resources can be grouped into a<br />

biotic & biotic both <strong>of</strong> which can be renewable and non-renewable. Biotic resources<br />

include agricultural crops, forests etc. The entire Himalayan region is endowed with<br />

natural flora and fauna and is a natural paradise for nature lovers, conservationists,<br />

botanists, zoo lists and environmentalists. There are 4500 species <strong>of</strong> flowering plants, 300<br />

species <strong>of</strong> primulas, 20 species <strong>of</strong> bamboos etc., 45 species <strong>of</strong> rhododendrons and around<br />

450 species <strong>of</strong> orchids.<br />

The State is very rich in fauna also. There are 144 species <strong>of</strong> mammals, 500-600 species<br />

<strong>of</strong> birds, over 400 species <strong>of</strong> butterflies and moths and many species <strong>of</strong> reptiles are<br />

available. Sikkim is rich in medicinal plants/herbs and also important shrubs are found in<br />

low and high altitude areas. The State is endowed with water resources, tourism,<br />

hydroelectric potential etc. Under economic geology minerals like copper, iron, lime,<br />

dolomite, limestone, coal, quartzite, silicate & graphite are available in the state. As per<br />

the available data around 60% <strong>of</strong> cardamom production in India is from Sikkim. There is<br />

a vast potential for hydroelectric power generation. Tourism development deserves<br />

considerable attention to add to the economy <strong>of</strong> the region.<br />

3.2.7 Hydropower Potential<br />

The Teesta and Rangit are the two main rivers <strong>of</strong> Sikkim where considerable hydro<br />

potential is available. Sikkim have developed 95.7 MW <strong>of</strong> hydropower potential so far by<br />

constructing mini & micro hydel projects and about 600 MW hydel potential is under<br />

development in different stages. The details <strong>of</strong> hydropower potential identified is as<br />

under:<br />

Teesta Basin :<br />

According to the preliminary reconnaissance survey, the river could be harnessed under a<br />

cascade development for hydropower generation is six stages as under :


i) Teesta Stage-I<br />

23<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

It is possible to diver the water <strong>of</strong> Teesta river d/s <strong>of</strong> confluence Chento chu near<br />

Shacham and d/s <strong>of</strong> confluence Lhonak chu and Poke chu by constructing diversion<br />

structures at EL ± 3330 and interconnecting tunnels discharging the Tail water at an EL ±<br />

2623 near the place Zema. The scheme will have installed capacity <strong>of</strong> about 320 MW.<br />

ii) Teesta Stage-II<br />

Under this scheme, a diversion dam <strong>of</strong> 83 m high is proposed near Bonsoi to divert the<br />

tail water <strong>of</strong> Teesta Stage-I and the power house at Chungthang. The scheme shall<br />

generate 330 MW.<br />

iii) Teesta Stage-III<br />

The schemes involve construction <strong>of</strong> Teesta River and Lachung chu near Chungthang and<br />

a <strong>Power</strong> house near Singhik. The scheme shall have the installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 1200 MW .<br />

iv) Teesta Stage-IV<br />

A diversion dam is proposed just d/s <strong>of</strong> confluence <strong>of</strong> Teesta and Tolung chu near the<br />

place called Sanklan and power house near the village Dikchu. The scheme shall have<br />

installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 495 MW.<br />

v) Teesta Stage-V<br />

A diversion dam has been proposed d/s <strong>of</strong> confluence <strong>of</strong> Dikchu chu and Teesta river and<br />

a power house near the village Sherwani. The scheme shall have installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 510<br />

MW.<br />

vi)Teesta Stage-VI<br />

<strong>Power</strong> Potential <strong>of</strong> Rangit Basin It envisages construction <strong>of</strong> a 76 m high concrete dam<br />

near Khanitar d/s <strong>of</strong> the confluence <strong>of</strong> the Teesta and Rongni chu in East Sikkim and the<br />

power house near the village Namthang/Tarkhola in South Sikkim with installed capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> 360 MW.


Rangit Basin<br />

24<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The hydropower development <strong>of</strong> Rangit river was identified in four stages as under :<br />

i) Rangit HE Project Stage –I<br />

The Rathong chu, a major perennial tributary <strong>of</strong> Rangit river has a very steep bad slop.<br />

The river takes a big loop near Yoksum. It is proposed to divert the water <strong>of</strong> Rathong chu<br />

at an elevation <strong>of</strong> about 2300 m U/S <strong>of</strong> Yoksum to elevation <strong>of</strong> 100 m near village<br />

Thingtom. The scheme shall generate 47 MW <strong>of</strong> power at 60 % load factor.<br />

ii) Rangit HE Project Stage-II<br />

It is proposed to divert the water <strong>of</strong> Rimbhi chu near Sigglitem and allow the water to<br />

drop through 425 m near Lingchum on Kalet chu to generate 10 MW <strong>of</strong> power at 60%<br />

load factor.<br />

iii) Rangit HE Project Stage –III<br />

A dam has been constructed just d/s <strong>of</strong> confluence <strong>of</strong> Rathong chu and Rangit river and a<br />

power house near the village Mongbru. The installed capacity <strong>of</strong> the scheme is 60 MW.<br />

The project has been commissioned by NHPC in the year 1999 and is in operation.<br />

iv) Rangit HE Project Stage-IV<br />

The scheme shall utilize a drop <strong>of</strong> 110 m from an elevation <strong>of</strong> 440 m to 355 m in Reshi<br />

loop. The scheme shall generate 18 MW <strong>of</strong> power at 60 % load factor.<br />

Schemes For PFR in Teesta Basin<br />

The Cenrtral Elecrtricity authority entrusted 10 schemes with total installed capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

1569 MW for preparation <strong>of</strong> prefeasibility reports as per details given below:<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Scheme<br />

Installed<br />

Capacity<br />

(MW)<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

River<br />

District<br />

1. Dikchu 105 Bakchachu/Dikchu chu East<br />

2. Rongni 195 Rongni chu East<br />

3. Namlum 160 Rangit South<br />

4. Panan 200 Tolung chu North<br />

5. Lingza 160 <strong>Ringpi</strong> North<br />

6. Rangyong 141 Rangyong/ Umramchu North<br />

7. <strong>Ringpi</strong> 70 <strong>Ringpi</strong> North


25<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

8. Rukel 33 Rukel/Rangyong North<br />

9. Jedang 185 Jhonak chu North<br />

10. Teesta Stage-I 320 Teesta & Zemu chu North<br />

OTHER SCHEMES IDENTIFIED BY CEA AND SIKKIM<br />

The CEA in the preliminary ranking studies and Sikkim in the preliminary studies<br />

identified the fallowing schemes:<br />

Sl. Name <strong>of</strong> Scheme Installed Capacity Name <strong>of</strong> River<br />

No.<br />

(MW)<br />

1. KalepHE Project 40 Teesta<br />

2. Talem HE Scheme 65 Teesta<br />

3. Serum HE Scheme 50 Lachung Chu<br />

4. Lachung HE Scheme 30 Lachung<br />

5. Chhota Pathing/Rolep 55 Chu/Sebokong<br />

Rangpo Chu<br />

6. Chuzachen 13 Rangpo Chu<br />

7. Suntalitar HE Scheme 25 Rangpo Chu<br />

8. Mana 37 Rangit<br />

9. Gompa 46 Rangit<br />

10. Rammam Stage-I 70 Rammam<br />

11. Rammam Stage-II 85 Rammam<br />

12. Rammam Stage-III 100 Rammam<br />

13 Chakhung Chu hydel 30 Chakhung Chu<br />

In addition to above schemes, the Govt. <strong>of</strong> Sikkim have identified about 40 mini/micro/<br />

small schemes for hydropower development in the region.


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – IV<br />

TOPOGRAPHICAL &<br />

GEO-TECHNICAL ASPECTS


CHAPTER-IV<br />

26<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS<br />

4.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

As a sequel to tap balance water potential <strong>of</strong> Sikkim, Central Electricity Authority<br />

proposed development <strong>of</strong> few schemes in a cascade manner. Accordingly, five run-<strong>of</strong>-<br />

the-river schemes have been proposed on Tolung Chhu and its left and right bank<br />

tributaries namely <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu and Rangyong Chhu respectively. These schemes are<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> and Lingza on <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu, left bank tributary and Rukel and Rangyong on<br />

Rangyong Chhu, right bank tributary. While another scheme namely Pannan has been<br />

proposed on Tolung Chhu downstream <strong>of</strong> confluence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu and Rangyong<br />

Chhu. The above schemes have been mentioned in order <strong>of</strong> their sequence on these nalas,<br />

while <strong>Ringpi</strong> and Rukel are upper most schemes, Lingza and Rangyong are downstream<br />

schemes on respective nalas and Pannan forms the downstream scheme. The <strong>Ringpi</strong><br />

hydroelectric scheme, proposed by CEA envisages construction <strong>of</strong> a diversion structure<br />

across <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu, a 7.2 km long water conductor system in the right hill and a<br />

powerhouse near Ishana. The diversion structure shall be located downstream <strong>of</strong><br />

confluence <strong>of</strong> Jumthul chhu and Kishong Chhu. Another scheme namely Lingza scheme<br />

has been proposed down stream <strong>of</strong> the powerhouse location <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> scheme.<br />

As per the MOU between CEA and NHPC, preparation <strong>of</strong> prefeasibility report <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong><br />

Scheme has been assigned to NHPC. Accordingly, a visit to assess the geological<br />

conditions in and around this scheme was undertaken in the month <strong>of</strong> October. As per the<br />

MOU report <strong>of</strong> GSI would form part <strong>of</strong> the appraisal, accordingly the report titled,<br />

“Geology <strong>of</strong> the Area Around <strong>Ringpi</strong> Hydroelectic Scheme” provided by GSI has been<br />

enclosed as Annexure-4.1. The present appraisal is based on field visit, study <strong>of</strong><br />

topographic sheet 78A/6 and data from GSI report.


27<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

4.2 REGIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOTECHNICAL FEATURES<br />

River Teesta in Sikkim is a major river originating from Zemeu glaciers and generally<br />

flows in north-south direction, at a steeper gradient. The river is joined by several<br />

tributaries major amongst them being Yumthang Chu, Zemu Chu, Talung Chu, Dik Chu<br />

and Rangpo Chu, apart from others join the river. The river valleys in this region are u-<br />

shaped while, as the tributaries had developed deep gorges, which are bound by steep<br />

slopes. A thick vegetal cover occupies the hill slopes. These hill slopes are generally used<br />

for cultivation <strong>of</strong> cardamom.<br />

A brief <strong>of</strong> regional geological aspect <strong>of</strong> this area has been provided. The Eastern<br />

Himalaya covers the Sikkim-Darjeeling-Bhutan and Arunachal Pradesh sectors,<br />

extending from the eastern Nepal to western Burma. The higher Himalaya is a zone <strong>of</strong><br />

crystalline rocks dividing two distinct lith<strong>of</strong>acies association in the south and the north. It<br />

is designated as the Axial belt. The northern zone comprising the Tethyan Palaeo-<br />

Mesozoic sedimentary sequence forms the Trans-Axial belt. To the south <strong>of</strong> the Axial<br />

belt occurs the Inner belt, comprising thrust sheets <strong>of</strong> Proterozoic-Upper Palaeozoic<br />

formations, while the foothill belt is represented by para-autochthonous Siwaliks. This<br />

scheme is valid for the entire Eastern Himalaya, upto the Lohit District <strong>of</strong> Arunachal<br />

Pradesh, where the geological picture does not conform to this general scheme. The<br />

stratigraphic sequence provided by GSI report on <strong>Ringpi</strong> Hydroelectric Scheme is<br />

brought out hereunder for the purpose <strong>of</strong> regional geological set up <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />

Group Lithology<br />

Gondwana<br />

Grits, pebble cum boulder beds and carbonaceous shale with<br />

occasional coal seams, pegmatite, quartzite (Tourmaline<br />

bearing)


Daling<br />

Chungthang<br />

Central Crystalline<br />

Gneissic Complex<br />

28<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

• Interbedded quartzite and chlorite sericite phyllite /<br />

schist<br />

• Lingza Granite<br />

• Quartzite/ Biotite schist<br />

• Interbedded quartzite and garnetiferous quart biotite<br />

schist.<br />

• Calc-silicate rock/marble.<br />

• Garnet-Kyanite-sillimanite-biotite-quartz-schist.<br />

Banded gneiss with augen gneiss and quart-biotite gneiss.<br />

Augen gneiss.<br />

Rock types belonging to Central Crystallines <strong>of</strong> Higher Himalaya occupy the area.<br />

Mainly high-grade gneisses with interbands <strong>of</strong> metasedimentaries, which comprise calc-<br />

silicate/ quartzites and high-grade schists. The metasedimentaries <strong>of</strong> the area occur as<br />

enclaves within high-grade gneisses. All the rock types have discordant intrusions <strong>of</strong><br />

tourmaline bearing quartz veins and pegmatites.<br />

4.3 TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF COMPONENT<br />

STRUCTURES<br />

The region is thickly vegetated and falls within Tolung Reserve Forest. Jumthul Chhu an<br />

E-W flowing river originating from Jumthul Phuk glacier meets Kishong chhu (a north-<br />

south flowing nala) near Tolung giving rise to <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu. Ringi Chhu from this<br />

confluence (Photo-1) flows south-easterly and takes a sharp easterly bend, beyond which<br />

it flows southeasterly upto Tolung gompa. Further downstream it flows N-S and then<br />

takes a southwesterly swing until its confluence with Rangyong Chhu. No major nalas<br />

join <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu from the right bank while few nalas like Dwathang Chhu, Ludul<br />

Chhu,Pegar Chhu, Kongcha Chhu and Zong Chhu join it from the left bank. The area is<br />

bound by ridges, which generally trend NE-SW and follow the general strike <strong>of</strong>


29<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

formations. The river flows in a steep gradient within cascades. Bed load in the nala<br />

comprises boulders, cobbles and pebbles in sandy/silty matrix. In general the valley<br />

slopes are thickly vegetated and occupied by a veneer <strong>of</strong> slope wash material, while rock<br />

formations are exposed as steep ridges. At places the hill slopes have been utilised for<br />

cultivation <strong>of</strong> cardamom. Entire area has a highly rugged terrain with elevation in vicinity<br />

varying from 2000 M to 6000 M. The area is approachable by a fair weather road upto<br />

Lingza beyond which a foot track reaches Tolung.<br />

4.3.1 Diversion Structure<br />

The proposed diversion structure is located approximately 100m downstream <strong>of</strong><br />

confluence <strong>of</strong> Jumthul chhu and Kishong Chhu. Here, <strong>Ringpi</strong> flows southeasterly. At the<br />

proposed location the nala flows in a relatively wider valley ±200m wide, in a steeper<br />

gradient. The area was studied in detail to assess the proposed diversion location and any<br />

possible alternative alignment. During the study it was observed that in vicinity <strong>of</strong> Tolung<br />

Gompa the river has carved a wider valley with moderate to steep slopes. Further<br />

upstream the nala section was inaccessible. A pile <strong>of</strong> debris material (approximately 10m<br />

thick) comprising boulders, cobbles and pebbles in a silty/sandy matrix occupies the<br />

riverbed section. A terrace has been developed in the right bank. The left bank slopes are<br />

comparatively steeper while the right bank slopes are moderate and become steep<br />

towards higher elevation, which show rock exposure. The area is under a thick vegetal<br />

cover. The right bank slopes are essentially used for cardamom cultivation. The diversion<br />

structure shall be located within gneisses, which are hard compact and jointed. The<br />

gneisses are expected to provide good abutment conditions. The rock formations<br />

generally trend NE-SW dipping northwesterly however, occasional NW-SE trends have<br />

also been observed in the area. Warping in the rock formations has been noticed. During<br />

future course <strong>of</strong> investigations few drill holes are required to be drilled in order to probe<br />

the bedrock and overburden depths. However, abutment conditions shall be assessed<br />

during further course <strong>of</strong> investigations.


4.3.2 Water Conductor System<br />

30<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

A 7.0 Km long water conductor system has been proposed in the right hill. A reconnoitre<br />

traverse from Ishana along the foot track in right bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> was undertaken upto<br />

Tolung. The area is bound by steep ridges (Photo-2), which generally trend NE-SW. A<br />

pile <strong>of</strong> slope wash material occupies the slopes along the foot track. Nevertheless, a few<br />

intermittent reaches show rock exposures. Also rock exposures are observed towards<br />

higher elevations. From field visit it is observed that the water conductor system is<br />

crossed by several seasonal drainages.<br />

This water conductor system shall be housed within the rock types <strong>of</strong> gneisses with<br />

occasional bands <strong>of</strong> augen gneisses. The gneisses are strong to very strong and are<br />

expected to <strong>of</strong>fer a good tunnelling media. The rock types trend NE-SW dipping 40-65º<br />

towards NW. Few intermittent stretches <strong>of</strong> calc silicate rocks/marble are also expected<br />

during tunnelling. However, these were not observed during the reconnoitre visit<br />

probably because <strong>of</strong> the overburden cover that occupies the slopes. Nevertheless, these<br />

have been reported in the area by GSI. Sufficient super incumbent cover is available<br />

above the tunnel. Fair to good tunnelling media with few pockets <strong>of</strong> poor rock mass, are<br />

expected during tunnelling. Prima-facie no major drainage appears to have deeply incised<br />

the proposed tunnel alignment.<br />

4.3.3 <strong>Power</strong>house<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu has developed an easterly convex bend forming a loop and this lope has<br />

been utilised to locate the water conductor system the powerhouse. The powerhouse<br />

location was fixed keeping in view the FRL <strong>of</strong> Lingza Scheme. Accordingly, it was<br />

proposed to keep the tail water above the FRL <strong>of</strong> Lingza Scheme. A foot track runs along<br />

the proposed powerhouse location upto Tolung and the present appraisal is based on the<br />

observations made along this foot track. At the proposed powerhouse location the<br />

formations are exposed as steep rocky escarpments. A thick pile <strong>of</strong> slope wash material<br />

occupies the area along the foot track. In view <strong>of</strong> the topographic conditions an


31<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

underground powerhouse has been contemplated. The powerhouse shall be housed within<br />

gneisses belonging to Central Crystallines <strong>of</strong> Higher Himalaya. These rock formations<br />

trend NE-SW dipping moderately towards NW. Fair to good rock media is expected<br />

during powerhouse excavation. Sufficient super incumbent cover is available above the<br />

proposed powerhouse cavern. The orientation <strong>of</strong> powerhouse shall be suitably aligned<br />

with respect to principal discontinuity. Towards the tailrace portion a thick pile <strong>of</strong> debris<br />

material is observed.<br />

4.4 SEISMICITY<br />

The site lies within Zone-IV <strong>of</strong> seismic zoning map <strong>of</strong> India IS 1893 (Part-I) 2002. IMD<br />

data <strong>of</strong> the region covering longitude 86-90 0 and 25-29 0 has been places at Annexure 4.2<br />

, which gives a list <strong>of</strong> earthquake events that have occurred within the region. The<br />

probable intensity <strong>of</strong> earthquake within seismic zone-IV corresponds to intensity VIII on<br />

Modified Mercali Scale. Notable earthquakes that have occurred close to this area are<br />

Cachar 1869 (M 7.5), Great Assam Earthquake 1897 (M 8.7), Dhubri 1930 (M 7.1),<br />

Bihar-Nepal Earthquake 1934 (M 8.3), Assam Earthquake 1950 (M 8.5) and Nepal-India<br />

border earthquake 1988 (M 6.4). The maximum intensity experienced in Sikkim region<br />

during Great Assam Earthquake, 1897 was VIII (MMI) and during Bihar-Nepal border<br />

earthquake, 1934 was VII (MMI).<br />

Two major tectonic features occur in the area namely MBT (Main Boundary Thrust) and<br />

MCT (Main Central Thrust) besides other minor features. Many past occurrences <strong>of</strong><br />

earthquakes have been associated with these major lineaments. Site-specific earthquake<br />

studies are proposed to design the component structures.<br />

4.5 GEO-PHYSICAL SURVEY<br />

The dam site is located in remote area, where proper approaches are not available due<br />

which Geo-Physical survey could not be conducted in such a small time schedule. While,


32<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

the powerhouse site is having sufficient rock exposures and hence the Geophysical<br />

survey was not done.<br />

4.6 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL SURVEY<br />

The riverbed is full <strong>of</strong> boulders, but it is shall not be sufficient to met the construction<br />

materials requirement. The area is bounded by steep rocky ridges and the quarries for<br />

construction material can be developed.<br />

4.7 RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

• The foundation for structures are required to be investigated by subsurface<br />

explorations to assess overburden thickness and its amenability for construction <strong>of</strong><br />

various structures.<br />

• Detailed geological mapping <strong>of</strong> the project components need to be carried out.<br />

• The survey <strong>of</strong> the quarries may be done to assess the quantities <strong>of</strong> construction<br />

materials and testing to assessed their suitability.


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – V<br />

HYDROLOGY


CHAPTER –V<br />

HYDROLOGY<br />

34<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

5.1 GENERAL<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> H E Project is a run <strong>of</strong> the river scheme, proposed on <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu, one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tributaries <strong>of</strong> Rangyong Chu/Tolung Chu, which in turn is a major right bank tributary <strong>of</strong><br />

river Teesta. The project envisages construction <strong>of</strong> a 30 m high diversion structure above<br />

river bed level, on <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu with a gross storage capacity <strong>of</strong> about 1.856 Mcum and<br />

area <strong>of</strong> submergence as 12.7 Ha at FRL 2966 m.<br />

The hydrological investigations and analysis have been carried out for <strong>Ringpi</strong> Project<br />

with a view to:<br />

• Assess the availability <strong>of</strong> water for power generation by establishing a series <strong>of</strong><br />

average 10-daily discharges for the project site.<br />

• Establish the spillway design flood<br />

• Determine the capacity <strong>of</strong> the reservoir and the area <strong>of</strong> submergence at different<br />

levels including FRL and MDDL.<br />

• Reservoir sedimentation.<br />

5.2 RIVER SYSTEM AND BASIN CHARACTERISTICS<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu is one <strong>of</strong> the major tributary <strong>of</strong> Talung chu river which in turn is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

major tributary <strong>of</strong> river Teesta and meets Teesta at Singhik on its right bank. <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu<br />

intercepts a substantial catchment area and is formed by two streams originating at high<br />

elevations having snow catchment in their upper reaches. The river has substantial flows<br />

and a steep gradient. The present <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E project is proposed just downstream <strong>of</strong> the<br />

confluence <strong>of</strong> Jhumthul Chu and Kishong Chu. The river meets Rangyong Chu/Tolung<br />

Chu near village Lingza.<br />

Tolung Chu originates from the Tolung glacier, which is a part <strong>of</strong> the Kanchanjunga<br />

range. The river is known by different names in different reaches. In the upper reach it is


35<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

known as Rukel Chu, further downstream it is called Rangyong Chu and in the lower<br />

reaches it is known as Tolung Chu. Tolung Chu is fed by a number <strong>of</strong> tributaries having<br />

large drainage areas at their confluence.<br />

The river Teesta is one <strong>of</strong> the main Himalayan Rivers, which originates in the glaciers <strong>of</strong><br />

Sikkim at an elevation <strong>of</strong> over 8500m above mean sea level. It is being snow fed by the<br />

glaciers Zemu, Changame Khanpu, Talung etc. It is an international river, which flows<br />

through the states <strong>of</strong> Sikkim and West Bengal in Indian Territory and then to Bangladesh.<br />

The river rises in mountainous terrain and is formed mainly by the union <strong>of</strong> two hill<br />

streams Lachen Chu and Lachung Chu at Chunthang in North Sikkim. The river upto this<br />

reach generally flows in a very steep gradient and the slope <strong>of</strong> the Teesta river upto the<br />

confluence <strong>of</strong> Lachen chu and Lachung chu is about 1 in 20. After the confluence <strong>of</strong><br />

Lachen chu and Lachung chu at Chungthang the river gradually increases in width and<br />

takes a wide loop flowing down to Singhik dropping in elevation from EL 1550 m to EL<br />

750 m. It is here after traversing about 20 Km that the river confluences with Tolung<br />

Chu. It joins Teesta river almost perpendicularly.<br />

The area has a rugged terrain with the surrounding peaks reaching a maximum elevation<br />

<strong>of</strong> approximately 4000m. The terrain hosts a rich growth <strong>of</strong> vegetation. In general the<br />

river flows in southeasterly direction. Numerous valleys are seen in the area, which are<br />

occupied by cultivated terraces. Few high level terraces have been observed in this area<br />

especially in vicinity <strong>of</strong> Lingza and Kayem village. The proposed <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E project lies<br />

upstream <strong>of</strong> Lingza H.E project.<br />

5.2.1 Cascade Development In Teesta Basin<br />

The river Teesta has tremendous potential for development <strong>of</strong> hydro power, as the river<br />

descends from an elevation <strong>of</strong> about 3600m to about 300m over a distance <strong>of</strong> about 175<br />

Km. According to the preliminary reconnaissance survey by Central water and power<br />

Commission in 1974, the river could be harnessed under a cascade development for


36<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

hydro power generation. The cascade development proposed at that stage consisted <strong>of</strong><br />

power generation in six stages on river Teesta. Out <strong>of</strong> these schemes, NHPC had<br />

submitted a DPR for Teesta H.E project, Stage-III in 1990. The diversion structure for<br />

Teesta-III was proposed to be constructed at Chungthang, which lies downstream <strong>of</strong> the<br />

confluence <strong>of</strong> Lachen Chu and Lachung Chu. Another project under Teesta Basin<br />

development, which is under execution by NHPC, is Teesta Stage-V having an installed<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> 510 MW, where a diversion structure is being built at Dikchu, about 2 Km<br />

downstream <strong>of</strong> confluence <strong>of</strong> Dikchu with Teesta. About 70km downstream <strong>of</strong> Teesta-V,<br />

NHPC has been entrusted two projects namely, Teesta Low Dam H.E projects, Stage-III<br />

& IV, having an installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 132 MW and 160 MW respectively. The proposed<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E project on <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu, lies downstream <strong>of</strong> Chungthang on Teesta river,<br />

which was the proposed damsite <strong>of</strong> Teesta (III) H.E project.<br />

5.2.2 Catchment Area<br />

The catchment area <strong>of</strong> the proposed scheme lies between Longitude 88o18′00” E to<br />

88o31′00” E and Latitude 27o37′00” N to 27o45’00” N. The catchment area upto the<br />

proposed dam site is about 126 Sq.km. The catchment is both snowfed as well as rainfed.<br />

The proposed diversion structure lies at Longitude 88o26′39” E and latitude 27o40′35”<br />

N. The catchment Plan is shown in Plate-5.1. A map showing various proposed projects<br />

in Tolung Chu basin is enclosed as Plate-5.2. The catchment plan has been prepared from<br />

1:50000, Survey <strong>of</strong> India toposheets. The entire catchment is covered in toposheets no.<br />

78A/6, and 78A/2. The EL4600m is assumed to be snowline thus making rainfed and<br />

snowfed areas as 63 Sq.km.<br />

5.2.3 Temperature And Humidity<br />

The climate in the region is fairly humid and moist. The abrupt variation in altitude is<br />

chiefly responsible for abrupt changes in the climatic conditions and aided by the<br />

complex orography, the area experiences frequent rainfall <strong>of</strong> varying intensity and<br />

duration. The maximum and minimum temperature varies from 390 C in summer to 60 C


37<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

in winter and the relative humidity varies from 80% to 100%. Temperature and relative<br />

humidity observations are being made in the basin at Dikchu site where Teesta-V H.E<br />

project is being constructed by NHPC and at TLDP-III and TLDP-IV sites, as a part <strong>of</strong><br />

cascade development on Teesta river. The monthly maximum, minimum temperatutre<br />

and relative humidity at Dikchu from Jan 1998 to Dec 2001 is enclosed as Annexure-5.1<br />

and annual maximum and minimum temperature from 1998 to 2001 is given in<br />

Table 5-1.<br />

Month & Year<br />

TABLE 5-1<br />

Temperature And Humidity Data At Dikchu<br />

Maximum<br />

Temp o C<br />

Minimum Temp<br />

o C<br />

Max. Relative<br />

Humidity %<br />

Min.<br />

Relative<br />

Humidity<br />

1998 38.0 7.0 99.0 89.0<br />

1999 39.0 6.0 99.0 90.0<br />

2000 39.0 7.0 97.0 85.0<br />

2001 31.0 11.0 97.0 90.0<br />

Overall 39.0 6.0 99.0 85.0<br />

5.2.4 Precipitation Characterstics<br />

In the Teesta basin the southwest monsoon normally sets in the third week <strong>of</strong> May and<br />

withdraws in the second week <strong>of</strong> October. The major portion <strong>of</strong> the catchment being hilly<br />

and the river flowing in steep gradient, heavy rains in the upper and middle catchments<br />

has an immediate effect <strong>of</strong> rendering the plains to flash floods.<br />

Sh. B.Biswas and C.V.V Bhadram in their paper titled “A study <strong>of</strong> major rainstorms <strong>of</strong><br />

Teesta Basin” and published in Mausam (1984), have studied the rainfall distribution,<br />

major rainstorms and their associated synoptic situations over the catchment based on 22<br />

%


38<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

years data (1960-81). The entire Teesta catchment extending from its origin in north upto<br />

the Indo Bangladesh border has been considered. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the rainfall distribution,<br />

the Teesta catchment has been divided into three parts viz. upper, middle & lower. The<br />

average annual rainfall is 1328 mm, 2619 mm & 3289 mm for the upper, middle and<br />

lower parts respectively. The monthly breakup <strong>of</strong> the annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the basin is given<br />

in Table 5-2 .<br />

Table 5-2<br />

Average Monthly Rainfall (mm) <strong>of</strong> Teesta Basin<br />

Month<br />

Catchment<br />

Upper Middle Lower<br />

Jan 21 23 6<br />

Feb 41 32 16<br />

Mar 73 66 30<br />

Apr 72 147 144<br />

May 142 274 315<br />

Jun 245 463 547<br />

Jul 236 621 866<br />

Aug 222 512 645<br />

Sep 171 338 495<br />

Oct 77 112 191<br />

Nov 15 19 21<br />

Dec 13 12 13<br />

Annual 1328 2619 3289<br />

From the table it is clear that July is the wettest month followed by August and June. The<br />

upper, middle and lower catchments receive 71.6%, 78.1% and 83.4% <strong>of</strong> the annual


39<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

rainfall respectively due to southwest monsoon. The catchment area upto the present<br />

proposed scheme comprises the upper and middle portions only.<br />

The authors have considered 53 rainstorms <strong>of</strong> duration ranging from one to three days in<br />

the study. The selection <strong>of</strong> storms is based on isohyetal analysis <strong>of</strong> daily rainfall values.<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the 53 rain storms 40 were <strong>of</strong> 1 day, 11 were <strong>of</strong> 2 day and only 2 were <strong>of</strong> 3-day<br />

duration. It was concluded that 1-day duration storm are more frequent, a fact that is also<br />

supported by the narrow width <strong>of</strong> the catchment for which the effect <strong>of</strong> any system lasts<br />

for a shorter duration. No storm <strong>of</strong> longer duration than 3 day is reported. Majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

storms have been reported in July & August. It has also been concluded that rain storms<br />

over this catchment occur in association with any <strong>of</strong> the following synoptic situations:<br />

(i) Break monsoon conditions i.e. shifting <strong>of</strong> the axis <strong>of</strong> trough close to the<br />

foothills <strong>of</strong> the Himalayas.<br />

(ii) Eastern end <strong>of</strong> monsoon trough lying north <strong>of</strong> Latitude 24 0 N.<br />

(iii) Movement <strong>of</strong> trough in west lies across the eastern Himalayas ; and<br />

(iv) Low pressure system lying over or to the west <strong>of</strong> the catchment.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the rainstorms studied by the authors were seen to occur due to either <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

two synoptic situations in July & August. A combination <strong>of</strong> first three synoptic situations<br />

is also a common feature over the area, giving rise to heavy precipitation.<br />

5.2.4.1 Rain Gauge Network<br />

As per the paper <strong>of</strong> Sh. B.Biswas and C.V.V Bhadram, the network density <strong>of</strong> rain<br />

gauges in the basin works out to be one raingauge per 300 Sq.km <strong>of</strong> the basin area. The<br />

data used by them is <strong>of</strong> 42 raingauge stations working under Indian Meteorology<br />

Department (IMD) and Central Water Commision (CWC), 24 <strong>of</strong> which are equipped with<br />

self recording raingauges. The rainfall data availability status <strong>of</strong> the raingauge stations in<br />

the catchment upto Teesta-V H.E project, with NHPC, is shown in Table 5-3.


S.No Name <strong>of</strong><br />

station<br />

40<br />

Table 5-3<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Data Availability Status Of Raingauge Stations upto Teesta-V<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> data availability<br />

1. Lachung Jul 57 to Dec 58, 1960 to 1964,1970 to 1981, Feb 91 to Dec 97<br />

2. Chunthang Apr 57 to Dec 58, 1960 to 1964,1970 to Jul 85, 1991 to 1997<br />

3. Lachen Jan 57 to Dec 58, Jan 60 to Apr64, 1971, Sep 77 to Jan 78, Jun 92<br />

to Dec 97<br />

4. Yumthang Jul 57 to Oct 57, 1958, 1960 to 1964, Jan 70 to Sep 82, Jan 83 to<br />

Apr 85<br />

5. Singhik Sep 75 to Sep 85, 1991 to 1993<br />

6. Thangu Jan 57 to Dec 58, 1960 to 1964, 1970 to 1974, Jan to Apr 83<br />

7. Dikchu<br />

(near<br />

Teesta-V<br />

dam site)<br />

8. Gayzing 1978 to 1988<br />

9. Yoksam 1978 to 1988<br />

10 Rangit<br />

dam site<br />

1992 to 1997, 2001 to Feb 03<br />

1991 to 1997<br />

11. Pelling May 93 to Dec 96<br />

At all the above raingauge sites, data for few months is missing in between. Raingauge<br />

sites have also been established near Teesta Low dam projects, Stage-III & IV and are<br />

operational since August 2000. Lot <strong>of</strong> efforts has been made to collect all available<br />

rainfall data in the basin but only rainfall data <strong>of</strong> 11 stations mentioned above is available<br />

at present. None <strong>of</strong> the above rainfall stations lie in the catchment <strong>of</strong> the proposed project<br />

so this data has not been used in the hydrological analysis.


5.3 WATER AVAILABILITY STUDY<br />

5.3.1 Stream flow and River gauges<br />

41<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Since Teesta River <strong>of</strong>fers ideal conditions for cascade development <strong>of</strong> hydroelectric<br />

schemes, the discharge passing through the river is measured at various sites by CWC.<br />

Recently NHPC has also established its various G&D sites on Teesta river since a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> projects have been entrusted to NHPC as a part <strong>of</strong> cascade development on the<br />

river. These include Teesta-V, and Teesta Low Dam projects, Stage-III & IV. However,<br />

no G&D data is available on <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu, at or near the proposed dam site <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E<br />

project. The various G&D sites and period <strong>of</strong> data availability in Teesta Basin is shown in<br />

Table 5-4.<br />

Table 5-4<br />

Data Availability Status Of G&D Sites In Teesta Basin<br />

S.No Name <strong>of</strong> site River Period <strong>of</strong><br />

1. Chunthang (before<br />

confluence <strong>of</strong><br />

Lachung &<br />

2. Lachung Chungthang Chu) (after<br />

3.<br />

confluence <strong>of</strong><br />

Lachung &<br />

Lachung Chu)<br />

availabilty<br />

Catchment<br />

Area<br />

(Sq.km)<br />

Lachen Chu Jan 75 to Aug 85 1919.25<br />

Teesta Jan 75 to Jun 86 2786.8<br />

Third Mile Tolung Chu Jan 75 to Aug 85,<br />

Apr 90 to Apr 98<br />

731.25<br />

4. Lachung Lachung Chu May 76 to Aug 85 634.50<br />

5. Chuba Yumthang Chu Jan 78 to Aug 85 355.5


42<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

6. Zema Zema Chu Jan 79 to Aug 85 900.0<br />

7. Sankalang Teesta Dec 89 to May 98<br />

8. Dikchu (near<br />

Teesta-V damsite)<br />

9. Sirwani (<strong>Power</strong><br />

house site-TeestaV)<br />

10. Legship (near<br />

Rangit damsite)<br />

Teesta Jan 84 to Oct 91,<br />

Nov91 to Oct96, Jan<br />

97 to Oct 03<br />

Teesta May 84 to Mar 97,<br />

2000<br />

Rangit Jan 77 to Dec 79,<br />

Apr 87 to Dec 87,<br />

Jan 90 to Dec 91<br />

11. Teesta Bazar Teesta 1972 to 1994<br />

4307<br />

12. Samco Ropeway Teesta Aug 2000 till date 7755<br />

13. Coronation Bridge Teesta 1972 to 1994, Aug<br />

2000 till date<br />

14. Domohoni Teesta 1972 to 2000<br />

.<br />

5.3.2 Present Study<br />

979<br />

8065<br />

No daily G&D data was available on <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu, on which the present project is<br />

proposed. For the pre feasibility study, water availability for the proposed project has<br />

been computed based on the following methodologies:<br />

(i) Based on observed discharges at Tolung Chu (Jan 75 to Aug 85, Apr 90 to Apr<br />

98)<br />

The proposed diversion structure for <strong>Ringpi</strong> project is located on <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu, which is a<br />

tributary <strong>of</strong> Tolung Chu. Daily G&D data is available on Tolung Chu from Jan 75 to Aug<br />

85 and Apr 90 to Apr 98. The G&D site on Tolung Chu has a catchment area <strong>of</strong> 731<br />

Sq.km. Average 10-daily series has been prepared based on this observed data and<br />

reduced to dam site using catchment area proportion, using a reduction factor <strong>of</strong> 0.108.


43<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Rainfed area at both the sites has been used in obtaining the reduction factor. The rainfed<br />

area upto G&D site on Tolung Chu is 583 Sq.km and that upto Rinpi H.E project is 63<br />

Sq.km.<br />

(ii) Based on discharge series <strong>of</strong> Teesta-III H.E project (1976-1984)<br />

Average10-daily series recommended for Teesta-III H.E project by CWC at Chungthang<br />

has been converted at proposed site using catchment area reduction (catchment reduction<br />

factor – 0.076). Rainfed area upto Chungthang site is 834 Sq.km. Thus a series for the<br />

period 1976 to 1984 has been obtained.<br />

(iii) Based on observed G&D data at Lachen (1976-1997)<br />

G&D data observed at Lachen has been converted at proposed site using catchment area<br />

reduction (catchment reduction factor – 0.22). Rainfed area upto Lachen G&D site is 574<br />

Sq.km. Thus a series for the period 1976 to 1997 has been obtained. Data at Lachen is<br />

missing for the years 1986-1988, i.e for 3 years. This missing data has been filled from<br />

the observed data at Dikchu G&D site (Teesta-V) using catchment area reduction.<br />

(iv) Based on discharge series <strong>of</strong> Teesta-V H.E project (1976-Feb 2003)<br />

The 10-daily series at Teesta-V H.E project for the period 1976- Feb 2003 has been<br />

converted at proposed damsite using catchment area reduction (catchment reduction<br />

factor – 0.031). Rainfed catchment area upto Teesta-V H.E project is 2020 Sq.km. The<br />

series from 1976-1996 is the approved series by CWC for Teesa-V and from 1997 to Feb<br />

2003 is the observed data at Dikchu where observations are being taken by NHPC.<br />

Average 10-daily discharge for all the above four series developed is worked out and<br />

compared. The plot showing this comparison <strong>of</strong> average 10-daily discharge at <strong>Ringpi</strong> is<br />

enclosed at Figure-5.1. From the plot it is obvious that the average 10-daily <strong>of</strong> the series<br />

obtained on the basis <strong>of</strong> G&D data observed on Tolung Chu is on a much higher side as<br />

compared to other three series. Rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f relationship could not be established for


44<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

the observed data on Tolung Chu as no rainfall data in the catchment <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

project was available. Hence, for pre-feasibility study, the series so obtained on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tolung Chu data cannot be adopted as such, it comparatively being on a higher side.<br />

Average 10-daily obtained from other three approaches are almost comparable so need<br />

for further statistical checks is not felt necessary. For pre-feasibility stage, the average<br />

10-daily obtained from G&D data at Lachen is recommended for <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E project.<br />

Though the catchment area reduction factor is very low for all three series, this series has<br />

been adopted as Lachen G&D site has a smaller catchment area as compared to<br />

Chungthang and Teesta-V. After estabilishing G&D site near proposed dam axis and<br />

obtaining more rainfall data in the catchment, detailed water availability study need be<br />

done during feasibility/DPR stage. The final 10-daily series at <strong>Ringpi</strong> is enclosed as<br />

Annexure-5.2.<br />

5.4 RESERVOIR ELEVATION AREA CAPACITY CURVE<br />

The reservoir elevation-area-capacity curve for <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E project has been prepared<br />

from 1:50000 Survey <strong>of</strong> India toposheets. The contours are available at an interval <strong>of</strong><br />

40m with the minimum bed level at proposed dam site being 2940m. The area enclosed<br />

within the contours has been found using Autocad. Area has been found from elevation<br />

2960m to 3120m at an interval <strong>of</strong> 40m. The volume between any two elevations is<br />

calculated using the conical formula :<br />

V = H/3 * (A1+A2+√A1A2)<br />

Where<br />

V = Volume between two contours<br />

H = Contour interval<br />

A1 = Area at level <strong>of</strong> first contour<br />

A2 = Area at level <strong>of</strong> second contour<br />

The incremental volumes thus computed are added up to obtain cumulative volume. The<br />

resultant area capacity curve is enclosed as Figure-5.2. The curve may be improved after


45<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

receiving toposheets in scale <strong>of</strong> 1:25000. The gross capacity at FRL 2966 m is 1.856<br />

Mcum and submergence area is 12.7 Ha.<br />

5.5 DESIGN FLOOD<br />

Design Flood for a project can be estimated by following approaches:<br />

(i) Deterministic approach using Unit Hydrograph technique.<br />

(ii) Statistical approach using Flood frequency analysis<br />

(iii) Empirical methods<br />

• Unit Hydrograph technique<br />

Due to non-availability <strong>of</strong> G&D data and hourly gauges, design storm values in the<br />

proposed catchment, rating curves and observed flood hydrographs could not be<br />

developed for computing the Unit Hydrograph and Design Flood hydrograph.<br />

• Flood Frequency analysis<br />

Due to non-availability <strong>of</strong> long term, consistent G&D data near the proposed scheme,<br />

frequency analysis could not be done to estimate the design flood.<br />

• Empirical Methods<br />

The following empirical relationships have been used to estimate the design flood peak:<br />

(i) Dicken’s formula<br />

Q = CA 3/4<br />

Where C = Dickens constant with value between 11-14 for North- Indian<br />

Hilly catchment. A value <strong>of</strong> 14 has been adopted in present<br />

study.<br />

Therefore, Q = 14 x 126 3/4<br />

A = Catchment area in sq.km<br />

= 527 cumec<br />

(ii) Ali Nawab Jung formula<br />

Q = C(0.386A) (0.925-1/14logA)<br />

Where C = 49 to 60 (55 used)<br />

Q = 55* (0.386*126) (0.925-1/14log(126))


= 1252 cumec<br />

46<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

(iii) Computation <strong>of</strong> Design Flood from Design Flood at Teetsa-III using Dicken’s<br />

formula<br />

The design flood recommended for Teesta H.E project, Stage-III was 4572 cumec. The<br />

total catchment area upto Stage-III dam site is 2786 Sq.km. <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E project is located<br />

on <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu river which is a tributary <strong>of</strong> Tolung Chu, which in turn is a major tributary<br />

<strong>of</strong> Teesta river and both the catchments can be assumed to be hydrologically and hydro-<br />

meteorologically similar. Therefore, it seems logical to transpose the design flood value<br />

<strong>of</strong> Teesta-III to proposed dam at <strong>Ringpi</strong>. This transposition has been done by Dicken’s<br />

formula using a conversion factor <strong>of</strong> 0.099.<br />

Q 1 = CA 1 n<br />

Q 2 = CA 2 n<br />

Where, A 1 = Catchment area <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> project<br />

A 2 = Catchment area <strong>of</strong> Teesta-III project<br />

Q 1 = Design Flood for <strong>Ringpi</strong> project<br />

Q 2 = Design Flood for Teesta-III project<br />

C = Dicken’s constant<br />

n= 0.75<br />

Q <strong>Ringpi</strong> = Q Teesta-III * (A <strong>Ringpi</strong>/A Teesta-III) 0.75<br />

= 448 cumec<br />

(iv) Computation <strong>of</strong> Design Flood from Design Flood at Teetsa-V using Dicken’s<br />

formula<br />

The design flood for <strong>Ringpi</strong> project has also been estimated by transposing the design<br />

flood at Teesta-V H.E project using Dicken’s formula. The design flood recommended<br />

for Teesta-V H.E project, having a catchment area <strong>of</strong> 4307 Sq.km is 9500 cumec. The<br />

conversion factor for converting it at <strong>Ringpi</strong> project, having a catchment area <strong>of</strong> 126<br />

Sq.km comes out to be 0.071.


Q <strong>Ringpi</strong> = Q Teesta-V * (A <strong>Ringpi</strong>/A Teesta-V) 0.75<br />

= 672 cumec<br />

47<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

A comparative study <strong>of</strong> flood peak computed from various methods is placed as<br />

Table 5-5.<br />

TABLE 5- 5<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> Various Flood Values<br />

SL .No Method used Design Flood<br />

(cumec)<br />

1. Dickens Formula 527<br />

2. Ali Nawaz Jung Formula 1252<br />

3. Transposition <strong>of</strong> Teesta-III<br />

Flood peak on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

Dickens formula.<br />

4. Transposition <strong>of</strong> Teesta-V<br />

Flood peak on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

Dickens formula.<br />

For pre-feasibility stage study, a design flood <strong>of</strong> 675 cumec has been recommended at<br />

proposed dam site.<br />

On availability <strong>of</strong> more data/information, design flood will have to be estimated by<br />

deterministic approach using unit hydrograph technique and probabilistic approach using<br />

flood frequency analysis in feasibility stage. Also, design flood has been worked out on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> design flood at Teesta-III and Teesta-V, which has been computed using both<br />

unit hydrograph technique and flood frequency analysis.<br />

5.6 SEDIMENTATION<br />

A rate <strong>of</strong> sedimentation <strong>of</strong> 0.1385 Ham/Sq.km/Year has been worked out for Teesta-V<br />

H.E project based on suspended sediment observations at Dikchu. In the absence <strong>of</strong><br />

448<br />

672


48<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

sediment data at or near the proposed dam site, the same silt rate <strong>of</strong> Dikchu may be<br />

adopted for <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E project too.<br />

The necessity <strong>of</strong> Detailed sedimentation study is not felt during PFR stage and the same<br />

need be done during feasibility/DPR stage with more observed data at the proposed site<br />

using a suitable method.<br />

5.7 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES<br />

The following are the improvements suggested for feasibility/DPR stage study:<br />

1. Proper raingauge network along with Gauge-discharge-sediment observation sites<br />

on <strong>Ringpi</strong> river need be established before taking up preparation <strong>of</strong> feasibility<br />

report /DPR.<br />

2. After establishing gauge and discharge site on <strong>Ringpi</strong> river with proper raingauge<br />

network in the basin, detailed water availability study need be conducted in<br />

feasibility/DPR stage.<br />

3. The reservoir elevation area capacity curve need be revised after availability <strong>of</strong><br />

reservoir cross-sections or 1:25000 scale contour maps in feasibility/DPR stage<br />

study.<br />

4. On availability <strong>of</strong> more data/information, design flood need be estimated by<br />

deterministic approach using unit hydrograph technique and probabilistic<br />

approach using flood frequency analysis in feasibility/DPR stage.<br />

5. Detailed reservoir sedimentation study need be done during feasibility/DPR<br />

stage with observed data on <strong>Ringpi</strong> river at the proposed dam site using a suitable<br />

method.


49<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project, (2x 35 MW)<br />

TEESTA BASIN PROJECTS Annexure 5.1<br />

Maximum, Minimum monthly temperature and Relative humidity at Dikchu (Teesta-V dam site)<br />

Month 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />

TEMPERATURE RELATIVE<br />

RELATIVE<br />

RELATIVE TEMPERATURE<br />

HUMIDITY TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY<br />

(%)<br />

(%)<br />

(%)<br />

Max O C Min O C<br />

Max O C Min O C<br />

Max O C Min O C<br />

Max O C Min O C<br />

RELATIVE<br />

HUMIDITY<br />

(%)<br />

Jan 25 7 92 23 6 90 22 9 90 20 11 96<br />

Feb 27 8 90 24 7 92 24 7 92 22 14 93<br />

Mar 30 10 92 28 9 91 N.A N.A N.A 24 15 91<br />

Apr 36 12 89 34 16 94 32 22 90 29 20 92<br />

May 38 14 91 35 18 93 36 17 87 29 19 91<br />

Jun 36 20 98 37 20 99 38 20 89 31 22 93<br />

Jul 35 20 99 39 21 96 39 22 90 31 20 90<br />

Aug 36 21 93 38 20 96 36 21 89 30 22 97<br />

Sep 35 20 93 34 16 97 35 20 89 28 22 95<br />

Oct 31 16 93 30 15 96 35 16 85 27 19 96<br />

Nov 29 14 92 28 13 91 31 14 90 25 16 95<br />

Dec 24 9 92 23 9 91 25 10 97 N.A N.A N.A


AVERAGE 10-DAILY DISCHARGE<br />

50<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project, (2x 35 MW)<br />

Annexure-5.2<br />

YEAR/MONTH JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AVG<br />

I 2.47 2.29 2.68 3.63 4.30 6.83 12.36 10.45 11.10 3.96 3.14 1.89<br />

1976 II 2.36 2.25 2.87 3.98 3.40 13.33 11.78 11.39 6.40 3.13 2.60 1.62 5.27<br />

III 2.22 2.31 3.09 4.69 4.77 9.67 8.97 12.18 4.67 3.16 2.32 1.49<br />

I 1.33 2.23 1.23 2.37 2.58 7.34 10.83 12.46 8.55 7.12 3.72 2.31<br />

1977 II 1.27 2.17 1.76 2.22 3.19 13.03 12.74 10.49 6.99 4.49 3.39 2.45 5.25<br />

III 1.21 1.30 1.63 2.36 4.55 9.48 15.26 12.24 5.83 3.58 2.56 2.77<br />

I 1.90 1.76 1.60 2.29 3.95 10.85 12.64 15.47 8.14 7.67 4.08 2.89<br />

1978 II 1.70 1.72 1.72 2.93 8.10 11.38 13.55 13.08 10.60 5.98 3.04 2.45 6.20<br />

III 1.74 1.58 1.90 3.47 9.46 14.39 13.07 9.82 7.97 5.10 3.00 2.20<br />

I 2.03 1.68 1.87 3.55 6.65 7.73 13.77 13.64 11.23 11.98 6.11 4.46<br />

1979 II 1.87 1.67 1.96 3.53 8.48 9.25 13.17 10.77 9.80 8.18 4.98 3.68 6.67<br />

III 1.84 1.82 2.41 4.43 6.49 13.26 14.76 11.42 7.19 6.13 4.69 3.54<br />

I 3.34 3.06 3.51 5.46 7.61 10.64 16.77 18.17 15.88 7.88 5.33 4.15<br />

1980 II 3.21 3.20 3.60 7.00 6.51 14.16 17.17 19.96 12.45 6.77 4.85 3.77 8.49<br />

III 3.18 3.41 4.86 7.98 6.94 15.85 17.99 16.62 10.08 6.31 4.47 3.43<br />

I 3.30 2.84 3.49 4.37 8.01 9.24 19.17 15.07 14.80 9.27 6.39 3.88<br />

1981 II 3.09 2.92 3.70 5.54 8.65 11.05 16.43 15.91 12.69 8.58 5.10 3.49 8.15<br />

III 3.05 3.53 4.37 6.53 8.39 15.00 15.46 15.46 10.11 7.50 4.22 2.73<br />

I 2.51 2.73 2.87 4.82 6.68 12.88 13.77 12.22 10.45 7.02 4.45 3.32<br />

1982 II 2.79 2.84 3.22 4.81 7.51 14.18 15.42 11.57 15.11 5.89 3.88 3.06 7.38<br />

III 2.75 2.76 3.83 5.33 7.29 15.68 18.19 13.58 9.91 5.68 3.75 2.90<br />

I 2.87 1.63 2.42 4.12 6.79 13.61 21.11 14.59 14.52 13.24 7.28 4.59<br />

1983 II 2.56 1.62 3.11 3.37 8.14 13.21 17.96 15.47 16.33 13.06 6.68 4.31 9.05<br />

III 1.79 2.25 2.80 4.22 10.83 18.43 17.82 18.07 18.84 8.90 5.51 3.86


51<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project, (2x 35 MW)<br />

YEAR/MONTH JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AVG<br />

I 3.44 2.91 6.40 7.39 8.94 19.29 23.98 22.93 24.79 15.81 11.51 5.67<br />

1984 II 3.39 3.02 7.15 7.88 13.07 23.20 24.06 23.00 23.66 20.05 9.95 5.58 13.21<br />

III 3.02 2.90 7.03 7.88 18.56 20.83 25.43 24.07 18.77 15.45 8.84 5.60<br />

I 5.65 5.08 7.13 8.66 8.88 9.21 25.70 22.79 12.00 8.26 4.84 3.17<br />

1985 II 5.36 4.64 7.73 10.45 10.31 11.50 33.53 24.03 11.46 7.24 4.21 2.87 11.44<br />

III 4.64 5.62 7.20 12.34 14.36 32.59 28.20 29.43 9.85 6.20 3.84 2.70<br />

I 2.50 2.38 2.99 3.29 4.47 6.09 13.25 13.22 11.04 9.00 4.83 3.32<br />

1986 II 2.49 2.45 3.26 4.25 4.75 10.33 16.56 11.36 13.72 6.73 4.30 3.06 6.75<br />

III 2.36 2.81 3.34 4.77 5.01 15.30 14.89 12.58 11.17 5.26 3.71 2.26<br />

I 1.97 1.65 1.67 4.55 4.75 10.29 14.38 14.56 19.10 8.70 4.50 2.27<br />

1987 II 1.86 1.63 1.99 3.18 5.28 14.94 13.75 15.88 10.22 6.48 2.74 2.08 6.87<br />

III 1.74 1.79 2.50 4.20 6.20 12.54 15.38 10.62 14.01 5.54 2.41 1.90<br />

I 1.86 1.80 2.17 3.78 5.08 8.13 20.03 17.21 11.44 7.29 3.21 2.56<br />

1988 II 1.86 1.88 3.22 4.27 7.61 11.76 15.73 15.79 7.72 4.83 2.89 2.43 7.18<br />

III 1.83 2.09 3.31 4.97 10.08 12.89 17.34 23.96 8.63 3.89 2.70 2.30<br />

I 1.41 1.51 1.67 1.82 4.58 10.24 18.27 14.52 10.83 7.70 3.31 2.13<br />

1989 II 1.37 1.38 1.70 2.18 4.73 16.97 17.97 11.39 9.81 6.55 2.69 1.85 6.67<br />

III 1.36 1.47 1.75 2.61 11.53 17.94 16.73 11.17 9.75 5.33 2.45 1.62<br />

I 1.48 1.22 1.01 0.87 2.62 11.23 14.13 13.13 11.36 6.35 3.26 1.86<br />

1990 II 1.37 1.15 0.83 1.43 4.62 10.97 18.02 13.34 10.88 6.47 2.43 1.54 5.78<br />

III 1.24 1.11 0.84 1.78 5.32 12.82 15.42 11.84 7.58 5.32 2.03 1.32<br />

I 1.34 1.26 1.29 4.08 4.13 5.96 9.88 12.03 11.54 7.54 4.07 2.31<br />

1991 II 1.32 1.20 1.47 2.32 5.03 9.41 9.63 13.86 12.19 5.98 3.60 1.77 5.40<br />

III 1.30 1.21 1.55 2.46 5.57 8.65 10.49 11.46 9.44 4.91 2.74 1.56<br />

I 1.42 1.27 1.26 1.54 1.94 2.50 5.94 7.47 7.15 4.40 1.98 1.59<br />

1992 II 1.18 1.22 1.27 2.16 2.25 3.57 6.01 7.50 7.04 3.16 1.76 1.38 3.28<br />

III 1.20 1.17 1.30 1.97 2.26 6.91 6.82 8.15 5.83 2.69 1.61 1.27<br />

I 1.29 1.18 1.99 2.11 3.50 4.10 14.10 18.54 17.71 12.53 6.61 5.21<br />

1993 II 1.30 1.26 1.98 2.30 3.15 5.23 14.09 17.57 14.92 9.30 5.83 4.79 7.01<br />

III 1.22 1.21 2.07 2.76 3.19 6.73 16.53 16.83 14.10 7.97 5.34 3.94


52<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project, (2x 35 MW)<br />

YEAR/MONTH JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AVG<br />

I 3.71 3.44 3.25 3.60 4.63 8.48 11.15 11.07 9.86 6.68 4.47 2.97<br />

1994 II 3.45 3.29 2.93 4.51 4.78 11.23 11.82 10.81 9.88 5.94 3.69 2.72 6.26<br />

III 3.49 3.53 3.71 4.14 5.88 13.04 12.04 11.63 8.54 5.43 3.08 2.57<br />

I 2.44 2.41 2.20 2.81 7.41 12.83 17.64 12.43 10.05 6.40 3.16 2.72<br />

1995 II 2.46 2.41 2.08 3.48 11.44 13.72 14.80 12.54 9.00 6.23 3.61 2.42 6.84<br />

III 2.43 2.42 2.87 5.08 11.05 13.90 11.38 11.14 8.66 4.86 3.63 2.25<br />

I 1.94 2.11 2.09 2.37 6.24 7.10 11.93 10.93 10.25 7.48 5.58 3.17<br />

1996 II 1.93 1.88 2.41 2.30 5.47 6.01 12.84 10.19 9.78 6.86 5.18 2.87 5.91<br />

III 2.04 2.05 2.57 5.12 7.57 10.73 11.43 10.27 8.51 6.13 4.61 2.70<br />

I 2.99 2.88 2.91 3.19 3.81 5.00 10.98 9.10 7.80 5.62 2.67 2.01<br />

1997 II 2.84 2.87 3.05 3.17 4.38 7.13 9.50 11.10 8.83 3.69 2.46 1.96 5.68<br />

III 2.36 2.25 2.87 3.98 6.48 11.50 15.29 13.89 11.46 7.24 4.21 2.87<br />

I 2.47 2.29 2.68 3.63 5.43 9.21 14.95 14.05 12.00 8.26 4.84 3.17<br />

AVG II 2.36 2.25 2.87 3.98 6.48 11.50 15.29 13.89 11.46 7.24 4.21 2.87 7.05<br />

III 2.22 2.31 3.09 4.69 7.92 14.07 15.33 14.17 9.85 6.20 3.84 2.70<br />

Note : 1) All discharge data is in cumec.<br />

2) Total no. <strong>of</strong> years -22


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – VI<br />

CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT &<br />

PLANNING


6.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

CHPAPER-VI<br />

CONCEPTUAL PLANNING AND LAYOUT<br />

57<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E. project is located in the North district <strong>of</strong> Sikkim state. It is a run <strong>of</strong> the<br />

river scheme proposed to harness hydel potential <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu, a Sub-tributary <strong>of</strong><br />

river Teesta. The available gross head <strong>of</strong> 1113 m is proposed to be utilised for generating<br />

70 MW <strong>of</strong> <strong>Power</strong>. One small reservoir <strong>of</strong> adequate capacity has been provided as<br />

operating pool to meet diurnal peaking load demands.<br />

6.2 PROJECT COMPONENTS<br />

• 3.3 m diameter, 400 m long Diversion Tunnel with u/s & d/s c<strong>of</strong>fer dam.<br />

• Concrete Dam 40 m high above deepest level & 300m long with a central<br />

spillway.<br />

• <strong>Power</strong> Intake Structure leading to 1 Nos. 3.5 m dia D-shaped intake tunnel.<br />

• One No. Underground Desilting Chambers <strong>of</strong> size 50m (L) X 5 m (W) X 7.5 m<br />

(H).<br />

• One 3.3m diameter horseshoe shaped concrete lined and 7.0 kms long Head Race<br />

Tunnel with three adits.<br />

• One 10 m diameter & approx. 50 m high semi-Underground Surge Shaft.<br />

• One circular inclined Pressure Shaft <strong>of</strong> 1.5m diameter, 1750 m long bifurcating to<br />

feed two Pelton wheel turbines.<br />

• Underground <strong>Power</strong> House <strong>of</strong> size 72m x 18m x 35m consisting <strong>of</strong> 2 Pelton units<br />

<strong>of</strong> 35 MW each.<br />

• One no.3.3m diameter Horseshoe shaped tailrace tunnel <strong>of</strong> about 250 m length.<br />

The conceptual planning and lay-out <strong>of</strong> project components have been worked out based<br />

on S.O.I topo sheets <strong>of</strong> 1:50000 scale (topo-sheet no. 78A/6) with contour intervals 40 m.


6.2.1 Conceptual Layout<br />

58<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The choice <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong> the dam has been made keeping in view the topography, geology<br />

and construction material at various locations <strong>of</strong> the diversion structure near the one<br />

suggested earlier by CEA. The location <strong>of</strong> the powerhouse has been fixed keeping the<br />

tailrace outlet level at EL 1853 m. This level has been kept 3m above FRL <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposed Lingza H E Project.<br />

The choice <strong>of</strong> location <strong>of</strong> the dam has been made keeping in view the topography,<br />

geology, and maximum water availability at the prospective site. The location <strong>of</strong> major<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the project, riverbed level at dam site, TRT outlet site and generation<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> the project as identified in the ranking study undertaken by CEA in 1990 have<br />

been considered during the preparation <strong>of</strong> this report. The upcoming hydroelectric<br />

projects on Teesta River <strong>of</strong> which <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu is a sub-tributary have been taken into<br />

consideration in the conceptual planning <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

The layout plan <strong>of</strong> the project and brief write up as envisaged by CEA have been<br />

enclosed as plate-1 and annexure 6.1 respectively. The cascade development schemes on<br />

the Teesta River as prepared by CEA is enclosed as plate-2 and <strong>of</strong> Tolung River basin as<br />

plate 3 and 4.<br />

Based on the hydrological and topographical study, reconnaissance survey <strong>of</strong> the site and<br />

input data <strong>of</strong> ranking study, a conceptual layout plan <strong>of</strong> the project was prepared and<br />

discussed with CEA for vetting during Dec’03. The minutes <strong>of</strong> meeting with CEA have<br />

been enclosed as Annexure-6.2.<br />

6.2.2 Dam and River diversion works<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> a 40m high concrete Dam has been proposed keeping in view the<br />

topography, geology and availability <strong>of</strong> construction material. The reservoir capacity<br />

formed by construction <strong>of</strong> dam has a gross storage pre-sedimentation capacity <strong>of</strong> 1.856


59<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

M.cum and live storage capacity <strong>of</strong> 0.567 M cum. After sedimentation, the reservoir is<br />

likely to have an adequate live storage capacity adequate for running the power station at<br />

full capacity for 4 hours in a day during the period <strong>of</strong> lean flows.<br />

Width <strong>of</strong> the valley at dam site varies from 50 m at riverbed level to 300 m at EL 2970 m,<br />

which is suitable for a concrete dam. Average bed level at Dam site is EL 2940 m. FRL is<br />

proposed to be fixed at EL 2966 and MDDL at El.2963 m. keeping in view the pondage<br />

requirement and inflow <strong>of</strong> water in <strong>Ringpi</strong> chu during lean period. The top <strong>of</strong> the dam has<br />

been proposed to be kept at EL 2970 m and foundation <strong>of</strong> the dam at EL 2930 m after<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> approx. 10.0 m thick overburden. The availability <strong>of</strong> construction material for<br />

the dam, c<strong>of</strong>ferdam and its suitability has been discussed elsewhere in the report.<br />

The overflow section <strong>of</strong> this dam is 30 m long and Non –overflow section is 270 m<br />

consisting 126 m on right abutment and 144 m on left abutment. The spillway has three<br />

bays each <strong>of</strong> size 4 m X 7 m with 3.0 m wide piers. The spillway is designed to pass a<br />

probable maximum flood <strong>of</strong> 675 cumecs with one gate inoperative. The crest <strong>of</strong> spillway<br />

has been kept at EL2950 m. The low-level orifice type spillway has been provided to<br />

flush out the sediment accumulated in the reservoir to maintain the live storage capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the reservoir. The top width <strong>of</strong> non-overflow has been fixed as 8 m. The d/s slope <strong>of</strong><br />

the Non-overflow section has been proposed as 0.8H: 1V and u/s slope as 0.1H: 1V. The<br />

project area falls within Zone-IV <strong>of</strong> seismic zoning map.<br />

One no. Concrete lined 3.3 m dia 400 m long diversion tunnel has been proposed on the<br />

left bank <strong>of</strong> the river to divert a flood <strong>of</strong> approx. 100 cumecs The design diversion<br />

discharge has been decided based on the experience <strong>of</strong> various ongoing NHPC projects in<br />

Teesta valley. This data shall however needs to be firmed up during the preparation <strong>of</strong><br />

detailed project report with the availability <strong>of</strong> more hydrological data & experience<br />

gained in the basin e.g.: during the construction <strong>of</strong> Teesta-V project. In order to divert the


60<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

river during construction <strong>of</strong> the dam, an u/s c<strong>of</strong>ferdam <strong>of</strong> approx. height 15m and d/s<br />

c<strong>of</strong>ferdam <strong>of</strong> 8-m height is proposed.<br />

6.2.3 <strong>Power</strong> Intake & Desilting Chambers<br />

The proposed power intake is on the right bank <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ringpi</strong> chu and consists <strong>of</strong> an<br />

intake and a D-shaped intake tunnel <strong>of</strong> dia 3 m. The intake structure is designed to pass<br />

8.68 cumecs, which includes flushing discharge i.e. about 20% <strong>of</strong> turbine discharge (7.24<br />

cumecs). The invert level <strong>of</strong> the intake structure has been kept at 5 m higher than the<br />

spillway crest to check the sediments entry in the water conductor system. The intake<br />

structure shall be provided with the trash racks to prevent the entry <strong>of</strong> trash into the water<br />

conductor system. The gross area <strong>of</strong> the trash racks shall be determined to give a velocity<br />

<strong>of</strong> not more than 1.5m/s. A mechanical raking machine operated from El.2970 m shall<br />

clean the racks. One vertical lit gate shall be provided for maintenance purposes along<br />

with a service gate for isolation <strong>of</strong> water conductor system.<br />

For efficient, trouble free and continuous operation <strong>of</strong> turbines with least possible<br />

wearing and erosion damages due to silt, it is necessary to remove 90% <strong>of</strong> the sediments<br />

larger than 0.2 mm-particle size. A 5 m wide Dufour type Desilting chambers with height<br />

7.5 m shall be provided to remove 90% <strong>of</strong> particles having size greater than or equal to<br />

0.2 mm. The size <strong>of</strong> desilting chamber has been arrived at to keep the flow through<br />

velocity to less than 0.25 m/s.The chamber has been provided with central gutter with<br />

holes to facilitate the flushing <strong>of</strong> settled silt particles through the flushing tunnel. A silt<br />

flushing conduit at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the chamber runs along the length and a silt flushing<br />

tunnel <strong>of</strong> size 075 m x 1.5 m D-shaped and 500 m length which will discharge the<br />

sediment back into the river d/s <strong>of</strong> the dam. Thus practically silt free water will be led<br />

into the headrace tunnel. The requirement <strong>of</strong> desilting chambers is being foreseen, on the<br />

lines <strong>of</strong> Teesta-V project, which is located d/s <strong>of</strong> this project. The size, alignment,<br />

orientation <strong>of</strong> the chambers can be optimized after more geological, topo-graphical and<br />

sedimentation data become available.


6.2.4 Head Race Tunnel, Surge Shaft, and Pressure Shaft<br />

61<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The proposed 3.3 m diameter concrete lined horse- shoe shaped headrace tunnel <strong>of</strong> 7.0<br />

km length, and having a slope <strong>of</strong> 1 in 250 is designed to carry a design discharge <strong>of</strong> 7.24<br />

cumec. The diameter <strong>of</strong> the headrace tunnel has been fixed from the minimum working<br />

area requirements. The Invert level <strong>of</strong> headrace tunnel is fixed at EL. 2955 m near intake.<br />

The rock cover above headrace tunnel generally varies from +100 m to +800 m. The low<br />

cover reaches are confined to prominent nalla crossings. Three nos. construction Adits <strong>of</strong><br />

3.3m dia are proposed to facilitate excavation <strong>of</strong> headrace tunnel within the scheduled<br />

completion time. The length <strong>of</strong> tunnel between 350 m long adit-1 & 700 m long adit-2 is<br />

2.5 Km and the length <strong>of</strong> tunnel between 700 m long adit-2 & 500 m long adit-3 is 4 Km.<br />

The location <strong>of</strong> the adits and portals are indicative and the actual lengths may vary. The<br />

tunnel is proposed to be concrete lined with 250 mm thick plain M-20 concrete. The rock<br />

support treatment shall consist <strong>of</strong> grouted rock bolts/anchors and shotcrete with or<br />

without wire mesh as per geological conditions encountered. In rock class <strong>of</strong> IV & V<br />

steel ribs supports is envisaged.<br />

A vertical, restricted orifice type semi-underground surge shaft <strong>of</strong> 10 m finished dia and<br />

about 50 m height has been proposed with its top opening into a platform at elevation EL<br />

+2975 m. Surge shaft is proposed to be concrete lined with 0.75 m thick R.C.C. Its<br />

bottom is kept at EL 2925 m at the HRT and surge shaft junction. The transient studies<br />

shall be required to be done to work out the maximum and minimum levels for the worst<br />

operation conditions, and optimize the surge shaft dimension.<br />

One no. Steel lined inclined circular Pressure Shaft <strong>of</strong> 1.5m diameter and 1750m length<br />

takes <strong>of</strong>f from the surge shaft which further bifurcates to feed water to two units <strong>of</strong> Pelton<br />

turbines each <strong>of</strong> 35 MW.


6.2.5 <strong>Power</strong> House Complex & Tail Race Channel<br />

62<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The underground <strong>Power</strong> House is located on the Right bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu u/s <strong>of</strong> Lingza<br />

dam. It will have an installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 70 MW (2 generating units <strong>of</strong> 35 MW each).<br />

The support system shall comprise <strong>of</strong> rock bolts and shotcrete. The centerline <strong>of</strong> the<br />

turbines is proposed at EL 1854.63 m. One number electrically operated overhead<br />

traveling crane (E.O.T) shall be provided for handling the electrical and mechanical<br />

equipment. A lift shall be provided near the service bay for approaching the lower parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> power house.The overall dimensions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Power</strong> House are 72 m x 18 m x 35m. A<br />

Control block area shall be located on one end <strong>of</strong> machine hall. The transformer cavern<br />

cum gate shaft is proposed 30m d/s <strong>of</strong> powerhouse cavern.<br />

A cable tunnel <strong>of</strong> size 2.0 m x 3.0 m will take <strong>of</strong>f from transformer area and shall carry<br />

cables to a surface switchyard. The Switchyard measuring approx. 150 m x 115 m shall<br />

be formed in cutting/filling.<br />

Water from the turbines is discharged in Lingza reservoir through two concrete lined<br />

tailrace tunnels, which merge into a single tailrace tunnel <strong>of</strong> diameter 3.3 m. This tunnel<br />

is 3.3 m diameter horseshoe and about 250m long with invert at EL.1852 at tailrace<br />

outlet. The tailrace outlet level has been kept at El. 1852 m in conformity with the FRL <strong>of</strong><br />

proposed Lingza H E Project.<br />

6.3 FURTHER STUDIES<br />

6.3.1 Topographical Studies<br />

1. Topographical contour Survey <strong>of</strong> the dam area and <strong>Power</strong> House area in 1:5000<br />

scales with 5m contour intervals.<br />

2. Survey in 1:1000 scale for locating the adits <strong>of</strong> the HRT.<br />

3. The riverbed survey including the cross sections at Dam axis and tailrace outlet shall<br />

be undertaken to firm up the power potential <strong>of</strong> the project.


6.3.2 Geological and Geo-technical investigations<br />

63<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

1. Geological/ geotechnical investigations including surface mapping and subsurface<br />

explorations like exploratory drilling and seismic pr<strong>of</strong>iling at the dam and<br />

powerhouse area.<br />

2. Rock mechanic lab tests shall be required for finding out the properties <strong>of</strong> the rock<br />

material.<br />

3. Construction material survey shall be required to be undertaken involving drifts, pits,<br />

and topographical surveys <strong>of</strong> the borrow/quarry areas.<br />

4. Site-specific studies for earthquake design parameters shall also be required to be<br />

undertaken.<br />

6.3.3 Design Studies<br />

1. Hydraulic design <strong>of</strong> various structures like spillway, power intake, desilting<br />

chambers, transient studies <strong>of</strong> surge shaft shall be required for firming up the<br />

dimensions.<br />

2. Stability analysis <strong>of</strong> non-overflow and overflow sections shall have to be done taking<br />

into account the approved seismic parameters.<br />

3. Hydraulic model studies for reservoir and Dam spillway shall be required for the<br />

confirmation <strong>of</strong> design parameters.<br />

4. Structural design <strong>of</strong> various components <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

5. Sedimentation analysis for working out the post sedimentation storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reservoir.<br />

6. Alternative studies for location, type and layout <strong>of</strong> main components based on<br />

detailed topographical and geological studies.


6.4 HYDRO- MECHENICAL EQUIPMENT<br />

6.4.1 Diversion Tunnel Gate And Hoist<br />

64<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

For the diversion <strong>of</strong> water during construction stage, one number horseshoe shaped<br />

diversion tunnel <strong>of</strong> 3.3m diameter has been proposed.<br />

After the construction <strong>of</strong> the dam, for the purpose <strong>of</strong> plugging the diversion tunnel, one<br />

number fixed wheel type gate will be provided at the inlet <strong>of</strong> the tunnel. The gate shall be<br />

operated by means <strong>of</strong> electrically operated rope drum hoist located on the hoist platform<br />

installed over the trestle above deck level. The gate is meant for one time closure, just<br />

before plugging <strong>of</strong> the tunnel. Height <strong>of</strong> the c<strong>of</strong>ferdam is 15m and gate is to be designed<br />

for operation against water height corresponding to 19.0m.<br />

6.4.2 Spillway Radial Gates, Hoists, Spillway Stoplogs And Gantry Crane<br />

Three submerged type radial gates shall be provided to control the discharge through the<br />

gated portion <strong>of</strong> the spillway. Each gate shall be operated by means <strong>of</strong> suitable capacity<br />

hydraulic hoist from a power pack and two double acting cylinders having a provision <strong>of</strong><br />

25% pushing force (one on each end <strong>of</strong> the gate).<br />

One trolley mounted mobile gasoline engines operated power pack capable <strong>of</strong> operating<br />

two gates at 25% <strong>of</strong> the normal rated speed are envisaged for emergency operation <strong>of</strong><br />

spillway radial gates.<br />

One portable oil filter unit for filtration, dehydration and degasification <strong>of</strong> hydraulic oil is<br />

also being provided.<br />

One set <strong>of</strong> spillway stoplogs has been envisaged to cater to the maintenance requirement<br />

<strong>of</strong> three nos. spillway radial gates. The spillway stoplogs shall be lowered / raised under<br />

balanced head condition by means <strong>of</strong> a suitable capacity <strong>of</strong> Gantry Crane.


6.4.3 Instrument And Remote Control<br />

65<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Gates shall be provided with PLC based remote control system for Control and operation<br />

<strong>of</strong> gates and automatic control <strong>of</strong> the reservoir level.<br />

6.4.4 Diesel Generating Set<br />

One diesel generating set complete with all accessories, equipment, instrument and<br />

wiring for making the equipment complete and for warranting a trouble free safe<br />

operation including its design, manufacturing, testing and commissioning will be<br />

provided for emergency operation <strong>of</strong> gates and hoists.<br />

6.4.5 Intake Trash Rack And Trash Rack Cleaning Machine<br />

Upstream face <strong>of</strong> the intake shall be provided with the trash rack screen, which will be<br />

cleaned by means <strong>of</strong> a trash rack-cleaning machine.<br />

6.4.6 Intake Gates, Bulkhead Gates And Hoists<br />

One number fixed wheel type gate shall be provided just downstream <strong>of</strong> the bell mouth <strong>of</strong><br />

the intake. The intake gate is to be designed for self-lowering against upstream water<br />

level corresponding to FRL. The gate shall be operated by means <strong>of</strong> electrically operated<br />

rope drum hoist <strong>of</strong> suitable capacity.<br />

For maintenance and inspection <strong>of</strong> intake gate and embedded parts, one number vertical<br />

slide gate has been proposed on the upstream <strong>of</strong> the intake gate. The slide gate shall be<br />

operated by means <strong>of</strong> a electrically operated rope drum hoist under balance head<br />

condition.<br />

6.4.7 Desilting Chamber Gate And Hoist<br />

One number slide type gate has been envisaged to cater to the maintenance requirement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the desilting chamber. The gate shall be lowered / raised under balanced head<br />

condition by means <strong>of</strong> a suitable capacity rope drum hoist.


6.4.8 Silt Flushing Tunnel Gates And Hoists<br />

66<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Silt-flushing tunnel is provided with a set <strong>of</strong> two slide (one emergency & one service)<br />

gates for regulating the discharge through flushing tunnels. Both the (emergency &<br />

service) gates shall be operated by means <strong>of</strong> hydraulic hoists. The gate grooves are<br />

provided with bonnet structures embedded in the concrete & a watertight bonnet cover at<br />

the top <strong>of</strong> the groove.<br />

6.4.9 Surge Shaft Gate And Hoist<br />

The upstream <strong>of</strong> the surge shaft is provided with a slide type gate. The gate shall be<br />

operated under balanced head condition by means <strong>of</strong> an electrically operated rope drum<br />

hoist.<br />

6.4.10 Tailrace Gate And Hoist<br />

To isolate powerhouse from the river during flood, one number <strong>of</strong> fixed wheel type gate<br />

has been envisaged. The fixed wheel gate shall be operated under unbalanced head<br />

condition by a suitable capacity electrically operated monorail hoist placed in the<br />

transformer cavern.<br />

6.4.11 Adit Inspection Gates<br />

Three nos. adits shall be provided with manually operated hinged type gates in the<br />

concrete plug at the HRT construction to give access to the head race tunnel in the event<br />

<strong>of</strong> any inspection, repair and maintenance.<br />

6.4.12 Pressure Shaft Steel Liner<br />

One no. Pressure Shaft <strong>of</strong> dia. 1500 mm fully steel lined will take <strong>of</strong>f from d/s <strong>of</strong> steel<br />

transition <strong>of</strong> Surge Shaft to feed the turbine placed in the power house. It comprises<br />

horizontal & inclined ferrules, 2 nos. vertical bends, 2 nos. plan bends, 1 no. bifurcation<br />

and branch pipes for feeding three turbines.


67<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The material <strong>of</strong> Pressure Shaft liner shall conform to ASTM A537 Class 1. However<br />

bifurcation material shall conform to ASTM A517 Gr. F.


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – VII<br />

POWER POTENTIAL STUDIES


7.1 GENERAL<br />

CHAPTER-VII<br />

POWER POTENTIAL STUDIES<br />

68<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The <strong>Power</strong> potential studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project has been made for 90% dependable<br />

year based on 21 hydrological years, from 1976-77 (June) to 1996-97 (May) as given in<br />

table 7.1. The salient features <strong>of</strong> the project are as follows:<br />

FRL (EL) = 2966 m<br />

MDDL (EL) = 2963 m<br />

TWL = EL 1853 m<br />

Centre line <strong>of</strong> M/C = EL 1854.63m<br />

Rated net head = 1106.37 m<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> turbine = Vertical Pelton<br />

Rated Discharge <strong>of</strong> Plant = 7.24cumecs<br />

Proposed Plant Capacity = 70 MW (2x 35MW)<br />

Generation voltage = 11KV<br />

Design Energy = 317.41 MU in the 90% dependable year with<br />

95% machine availability<br />

Minimum Peaking (Hrs) = 4.00 hrs (approx.)<br />

7.2 AVAILABLE FLOW<br />

The discharge data for the 90% dependable hydrological year is given in Table 7.3. For<br />

carrying out the power potential and optimisation studies, the following statistics have<br />

been computed.<br />

Year:<br />

Each 10-daily period <strong>of</strong> the year represents the average <strong>of</strong> the flow recorded for<br />

the corresponding period <strong>of</strong> each year.


90% Dependable Year:<br />

69<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

This is the lower decile <strong>of</strong> the series <strong>of</strong> the corresponding 10-daily period <strong>of</strong> the record<br />

i.e. (N+1) x 0.9 th year where N is the years for which continuous hydrological data are<br />

available. The 90% dependable year comes out to be 1976-77 whose calculations are<br />

shown in table 7.2.<br />

7.3 DEFINITION OF TERMS<br />

Annual Energy<br />

This is the yearly energy provided during the 90% dependable hydrological year with<br />

95% machine availability.<br />

Firm <strong>Power</strong><br />

This is the power capacity, which can be guaranteed continuously during the lean period<br />

in 90% dependable year. During lean inflow period the firm power comes out to be 11.69<br />

MW.<br />

7.4 FULL RESERVOIR LEVEL (FRL) AND MINIMUM DRAW DOWN<br />

LEVEL (MDDL)<br />

FRL and MDDL have been fixed at EL 2966 m & EL 2963 m respectively based on civil<br />

consideration. This project is envisaged as a run <strong>of</strong> the river scheme with small pondage.<br />

7.5 OPERATING HEAD AND HEAD LOSSES<br />

The net operating head for turbines has been derived from the following formula where<br />

head losses are taken as 15 m.<br />

Net operating head =MDDL+2/3 (FRL-MDDL)-TCL-Head losses<br />

The net operating head comes out to 1106.37 m.


7.6 INSTALLED CAPACITY<br />

70<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The studies for power output and annual energy generation for the 90% dependable year<br />

has been given in Table 7.4 (A). Considering water availability the total installed capacity<br />

has been selected as 70 MW.<br />

7.7 SIZE OF GENERATING UNITS<br />

The power load demand in India is increasing at a very rapid rate and both hydroelectric<br />

and thermal (including nuclear) <strong>Power</strong> potential in the country are being developed not<br />

only to meet the overall requirements, but stimulatingly also to provide a proper mix <strong>of</strong><br />

hydro and thermal power for optimum operation <strong>of</strong> the system. Keeping this in view<br />

current practice is to opt for largest size hydro units permissible within the parameters <strong>of</strong><br />

economy, operating efficiency, maintenance, optimum utilization <strong>of</strong> available water,<br />

transport limitation etc. It is therefore proposed to install 2 units each <strong>of</strong> 35 MW capacity<br />

with Pelton turbine as prime mover.<br />

7.8 ENERGY GENERATION<br />

The energy generation in the 90% dependable year (1976-77) indicating lean inflow<br />

period and high inflow period is shown in Table 7.4 (B). It may be seen from Table 7.4<br />

(A) that the total unrestricted energy generation is 410.248 .Annual energy generation at<br />

70 MW comes out to be 317.41 MU. Annual load factor for lean and mansoon periods<br />

have been shown in Table 7.4(B). Incremental benefits have been shown in Table 7.6<br />

which comes out to be 2.45 for this year. Also annual energy generation unrestricted has<br />

been indicated in table 7.7(A) to 7.7(U) for 21 hydrological years. Energy available at<br />

bus bar shall be 313.61MU after allowing auxiliary consumption <strong>of</strong> 0.7% and transformer<br />

losses <strong>of</strong> 0.5% respectively.


71<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project, (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Table-7.1<br />

DISCHARGE DATA<br />

PERIOD 1976- 1977- 1978- 1979- 1980- 1981- 1982- 1983- 1984- 1985- 1986- 1987- 1988- 1989- 1990- 1991- 1992- 1993- 1994- 1995- 1996-<br />

1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997<br />

JUN<br />

I<br />

II<br />

6.83<br />

13.33<br />

7.34<br />

13.03<br />

10.85<br />

11.38<br />

7.73<br />

9.25<br />

10.64<br />

14.16<br />

9.24<br />

11.05<br />

12.88<br />

14.18<br />

13.61<br />

13.21<br />

19.29<br />

23.20<br />

9.21<br />

11.50<br />

6.09<br />

10.33<br />

10.29<br />

14.94<br />

8.13<br />

11.76<br />

10.24<br />

16.97<br />

11.23<br />

10.97<br />

5.96<br />

9.41<br />

2.50<br />

3.57<br />

4.10<br />

5.23<br />

8.48<br />

11.23<br />

12.83<br />

13.72<br />

7.10<br />

6.01<br />

JUL<br />

III<br />

I<br />

II<br />

9.67<br />

12.36<br />

11.78<br />

9.48<br />

10.83<br />

12.47<br />

14.39<br />

12.64<br />

13.55<br />

13.26<br />

13.77<br />

13.17<br />

15.85<br />

16.77<br />

17.17<br />

15.00<br />

19.17<br />

16.43<br />

15.68<br />

13.77<br />

15.42<br />

18.43<br />

21.11<br />

17.96<br />

20.83<br />

23.98<br />

24.06<br />

32.59<br />

25.70<br />

33.53<br />

15.30<br />

13.25<br />

16.56<br />

12.54<br />

14.38<br />

13.75<br />

12.89<br />

20.03<br />

15.73<br />

17.94<br />

18.27<br />

17.97<br />

12.82<br />

14.13<br />

18.02<br />

8.65<br />

9.88<br />

9.63<br />

6.91<br />

5.94<br />

6.01<br />

6.73<br />

14.10<br />

14.09<br />

13.04<br />

11.15<br />

11.82<br />

13.90<br />

17.64<br />

14.80<br />

10.73<br />

11.93<br />

12.84<br />

III 8.97 15.26 13.07 14.76 17.99 15.46 18.19 17.82 25.43 28.20 14.89 15.38 17.34 16.73 15.42 10.49 6.82 16.53 12.04 11.38 11.43<br />

AUG<br />

I<br />

II<br />

10.45<br />

11.39<br />

12.46<br />

10.49<br />

15.47<br />

13.08<br />

13.64<br />

10.77<br />

18.17<br />

19.96<br />

15.07<br />

15.91<br />

12.22<br />

11.57<br />

14.59<br />

15.47<br />

22.93<br />

23.00<br />

22.79<br />

24.03<br />

13.22<br />

11.36<br />

14.56<br />

15.88<br />

17.21<br />

15.79<br />

14.52<br />

11.39<br />

13.13<br />

13.34<br />

12.03<br />

13.86<br />

7.47<br />

7.50<br />

18.54<br />

17.57<br />

11.07<br />

10.81<br />

12.43<br />

12.54<br />

10.93<br />

10.19<br />

SEP<br />

III<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

12.18<br />

11.10<br />

6.40<br />

4.67<br />

12.24<br />

8.55<br />

6.99<br />

5.83<br />

9.82<br />

8.14<br />

10.60<br />

7.97<br />

11.42<br />

11.23<br />

9.80<br />

7.19<br />

16.62<br />

15.88<br />

12.45<br />

10.08<br />

15.46<br />

14.80<br />

12.69<br />

10.11<br />

13.58<br />

10.45<br />

15.11<br />

9.91<br />

18.07<br />

14.52<br />

16.33<br />

18.84<br />

24.07<br />

24.79<br />

23.66<br />

18.77<br />

29.43<br />

12.00<br />

11.46<br />

9.85<br />

12.58<br />

11.04<br />

13.72<br />

11.17<br />

10.62<br />

19.10<br />

10.22<br />

14.01<br />

23.96<br />

11.44<br />

7.72<br />

8.63<br />

11.17<br />

10.83<br />

9.81<br />

9.75<br />

11.84<br />

11.36<br />

10.88<br />

7.58<br />

11.46<br />

11.54<br />

12.19<br />

9.44<br />

8.15<br />

7.15<br />

7.04<br />

5.83<br />

16.83<br />

17.71<br />

14.92<br />

14.10<br />

11.63<br />

9.86<br />

9.88<br />

8.54<br />

11.14<br />

10.05<br />

9.00<br />

8.66<br />

10.27<br />

10.25<br />

9.78<br />

8.51<br />

OCT<br />

I<br />

II<br />

3.96<br />

3.13<br />

7.12<br />

4.49<br />

7.67<br />

5.98<br />

11.98<br />

8.18<br />

7.88<br />

6.77<br />

9.27<br />

8.58<br />

7.02<br />

5.89<br />

13.24<br />

13.06<br />

15.81<br />

20.05<br />

8.26<br />

7.24<br />

9.00<br />

6.73<br />

8.70<br />

6.48<br />

7.29<br />

4.83<br />

7.70<br />

6.55<br />

6.35<br />

6.47<br />

7.54<br />

5.98<br />

4.40<br />

3.16<br />

12.53<br />

9.30<br />

6.68<br />

5.94<br />

6.40<br />

6.23<br />

7.48<br />

6.86<br />

NOV<br />

III<br />

I<br />

II<br />

3.16<br />

3.14<br />

2.60<br />

3.58<br />

3.72<br />

3.39<br />

5.10<br />

4.08<br />

3.04<br />

6.13<br />

6.11<br />

4.98<br />

6.31<br />

5.33<br />

4.85<br />

7.50<br />

6.39<br />

5.10<br />

5.68<br />

4.45<br />

3.88<br />

8.90<br />

7.28<br />

6.68<br />

15.45<br />

11.51<br />

9.95<br />

6.20<br />

4.84<br />

4.21<br />

5.26<br />

4.83<br />

4.30<br />

5.54<br />

4.50<br />

2.74<br />

3.89<br />

3.21<br />

2.89<br />

5.33<br />

3.31<br />

2.69<br />

5.32<br />

3.26<br />

2.43<br />

4.91<br />

4.07<br />

3.60<br />

2.69<br />

1.98<br />

1.76<br />

7.97<br />

6.61<br />

5.83<br />

5.43<br />

4.47<br />

3.69<br />

4.86<br />

3.16<br />

3.61<br />

6.13<br />

5.58<br />

5.18<br />

DEC<br />

III<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

2.32<br />

1.89<br />

1.62<br />

1.49<br />

2.56<br />

2.31<br />

2.45<br />

2.77<br />

3.00<br />

2.89<br />

2.45<br />

2.20<br />

4.69<br />

4.46<br />

3.68<br />

3.54<br />

4.47<br />

4.15<br />

3.77<br />

3.43<br />

4.22<br />

3.88<br />

3.49<br />

2.73<br />

3.75<br />

3.32<br />

3.02<br />

2.90<br />

5.51<br />

4.59<br />

4.31<br />

3.86<br />

8.84<br />

5.67<br />

5.58<br />

5.60<br />

3.84<br />

3.17<br />

2.87<br />

2.70<br />

3.71<br />

3.32<br />

3.06<br />

2.26<br />

2.41<br />

2.27<br />

2.08<br />

1.90<br />

2.70<br />

2.56<br />

2.43<br />

2.30<br />

2.45<br />

2.13<br />

1.85<br />

1.62<br />

2.03<br />

1.86<br />

1.54<br />

1.32<br />

2.74<br />

2.31<br />

1.77<br />

1.56<br />

1.61<br />

1.59<br />

1.38<br />

1.27<br />

5.34<br />

5.21<br />

4.79<br />

3.94<br />

3.08<br />

2.97<br />

2.72<br />

2.57<br />

3.63<br />

2.72<br />

2.42<br />

2.25<br />

4.61<br />

3.17<br />

2.87<br />

2.70<br />

JAN<br />

I<br />

II<br />

1.33<br />

1.27<br />

1.90<br />

1.70<br />

2.03<br />

1.87<br />

3.34<br />

3.21<br />

3.30<br />

3.09<br />

2.51<br />

2.79<br />

2.87<br />

2.56<br />

3.44<br />

3.39<br />

5.65<br />

5.36<br />

2.50<br />

2.49<br />

1.97<br />

1.86<br />

1.86<br />

1.86<br />

1.41<br />

1.37<br />

1.48<br />

1.37<br />

1.34<br />

1.32<br />

1.42<br />

1.18<br />

1.29<br />

1.30<br />

3.71<br />

3.45<br />

2.44<br />

2.46<br />

1.94<br />

1.93<br />

2.99<br />

2.84<br />

FEB<br />

III<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

1.21<br />

2.23<br />

2.17<br />

1.30<br />

1.74<br />

1.76<br />

1.72<br />

1.58<br />

1.84<br />

1.68<br />

1.67<br />

1.82<br />

3.18<br />

3.06<br />

3.20<br />

3.41<br />

3.05<br />

2.84<br />

2.92<br />

3.53<br />

2.75<br />

2.73<br />

2.84<br />

2.76<br />

1.79<br />

1.63<br />

1.62<br />

2.25<br />

3.02<br />

2.91<br />

3.02<br />

2.90<br />

4.64<br />

5.08<br />

4.64<br />

5.62<br />

2.36<br />

2.38<br />

2.45<br />

2.81<br />

1.74<br />

1.65<br />

1.63<br />

1.79<br />

1.83<br />

1.80<br />

1.88<br />

2.09<br />

1.36<br />

1.51<br />

1.38<br />

1.47<br />

1.24<br />

1.22<br />

1.15<br />

1.11<br />

1.30<br />

1.26<br />

1.20<br />

1.21<br />

1.20<br />

1.27<br />

1.22<br />

1.17<br />

1.22<br />

1.18<br />

1.26<br />

1.21<br />

3.49<br />

3.44<br />

3.29<br />

3.53<br />

2.43<br />

2.41<br />

2.41<br />

2.42<br />

2.04<br />

2.11<br />

1.88<br />

2.05<br />

2.36<br />

2.88<br />

2.87<br />

2.25<br />

MAR<br />

I<br />

II<br />

1.23<br />

1.76<br />

1.60<br />

1.72<br />

1.87<br />

1.96<br />

3.51<br />

3.60<br />

3.49<br />

3.70<br />

2.87<br />

3.22<br />

2.42<br />

3.11<br />

6.40<br />

7.15<br />

7.13<br />

7.73<br />

2.99<br />

3.26<br />

1.67<br />

1.99<br />

2.17<br />

3.22<br />

1.67<br />

1.70<br />

1.01<br />

0.83<br />

1.29<br />

1.47<br />

1.26<br />

1.27<br />

1.99<br />

1.98<br />

3.25<br />

2.93<br />

2.20<br />

2.08<br />

2.09<br />

2.41<br />

2.91<br />

3.05<br />

APR<br />

III<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

1.63<br />

2.37<br />

2.22<br />

2.36<br />

1.90<br />

2.29<br />

2.93<br />

3.47<br />

2.41<br />

3.55<br />

3.53<br />

4.43<br />

4.86<br />

5.46<br />

7.00<br />

7.98<br />

4.37<br />

4.37<br />

5.54<br />

6.53<br />

3.83<br />

4.82<br />

4.81<br />

5.33<br />

2.80<br />

4.12<br />

3.37<br />

4.22<br />

7.03<br />

7.39<br />

7.88<br />

7.88<br />

7.20<br />

8.66<br />

10.45<br />

12.34<br />

3.34<br />

3.29<br />

4.25<br />

4.77<br />

2.50<br />

4.55<br />

3.18<br />

4.20<br />

3.31<br />

3.78<br />

4.27<br />

4.97<br />

1.75<br />

1.82<br />

2.18<br />

2.61<br />

0.84<br />

0.87<br />

1.43<br />

1.78<br />

1.55<br />

4.08<br />

2.32<br />

2.46<br />

1.30<br />

1.54<br />

2.16<br />

1.97<br />

2.07<br />

2.11<br />

2.30<br />

2.76<br />

3.71<br />

3.60<br />

4.51<br />

4.14<br />

2.87<br />

2.81<br />

3.48<br />

5.08<br />

2.57<br />

2.37<br />

2.30<br />

5.12<br />

2.87<br />

3.19<br />

3.17<br />

3.98<br />

MAY<br />

I<br />

II<br />

2.58<br />

3.19<br />

3.95<br />

8.10<br />

6.65<br />

8.48<br />

7.61<br />

6.51<br />

8.01<br />

8.65<br />

6.68<br />

7.51<br />

6.79<br />

8.14<br />

8.94<br />

13.07<br />

8.88<br />

10.31<br />

4.47<br />

4.75<br />

4.75<br />

5.28<br />

5.08<br />

7.61<br />

4.58<br />

4.73<br />

2.62<br />

4.62<br />

4.13<br />

5.03<br />

1.94<br />

2.25<br />

3.50<br />

3.15<br />

4.63<br />

4.78<br />

7.41<br />

11.44<br />

6.24<br />

5.47<br />

3.81<br />

4.38<br />

III 4.55 9.46 6.49 6.94 8.39 7.29 10.83 18.56 14.36 5.01 6.20 10.08 11.53 5.32 5.57 2.26 3.19 5.88 11.05 7.57 6.48


YEAR<br />

Table-7.2<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY<br />

ARRANGED IN DESCENDING<br />

ORDER<br />

72<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

RANK OF<br />

THE YEAR<br />

1984-1985 1157.401 1<br />

1983-1984 876.174 2<br />

1985-1986 816.100 3<br />

1980-1981 718.437 4<br />

1981-1982 670.779 5<br />

1993-1994 661.965 6<br />

1979-1980 620.019 7<br />

1982-1983 618.082 8<br />

1987-1988 609.362 9<br />

1988-1989 579.126 10<br />

1986-1987 559.195 11<br />

1995-1996 546.002 12<br />

1994-1995 543.618 13<br />

1978-1979 536.593 14<br />

1989-1990 533.657 15<br />

1990-1991 512.106 16<br />

1996-1997 506.387 17<br />

1977-1978 481.352 18<br />

1991-1992 430.499 19<br />

1976-1977 410.248 20<br />

1992-1993 295.777 21<br />

90% dependable year<br />

=(N+1) x 0.9th year (where N=no. <strong>of</strong> years)<br />

=(21+1)*0.9th year<br />

=20<br />

1976-77 is 90% dependable year<br />

1986-87 is 50% dependable year<br />

Unrestricted energy <strong>of</strong> 90% dependable year is 410.248 MU<br />

90% dependable energy when power restricted to 70 MW is 317.41 MU


Table-7.3<br />

90% DEPENDABLE FLOWS FOR POWER GENERATION<br />

MONTH/PERIOD<br />

JUN<br />

JUL<br />

AUG<br />

SEP<br />

OCT<br />

NOV<br />

DEC<br />

JAN<br />

FEB<br />

MAR<br />

APR<br />

MAY<br />

73<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

90% dependable year 1976-77 inflow (cumecs)<br />

10- daily series for the reservoir<br />

I 6.83<br />

II 13.33<br />

III 9.67<br />

I 12.36<br />

II 11.78<br />

III 8.97<br />

I 10.45<br />

II 11.39<br />

III 12.18<br />

I 11.10<br />

II 6.40<br />

III 4.67<br />

I 3.96<br />

II 3.13<br />

III 3.16<br />

I 3.14<br />

II 2.60<br />

III 2.32<br />

I 1.89<br />

II 1.62<br />

III 1.49<br />

I 1.33<br />

II 1.27<br />

III 1.21<br />

I 2.23<br />

II 2.17<br />

III 1.30<br />

I 1.23<br />

II 1.76<br />

III 1.63<br />

I 2.37<br />

II 2.22<br />

III 2.36<br />

I 2.58<br />

II 3.19<br />

III 4.55


Table-7.4 (A)<br />

POWER POTENTIAL STUDY OF 90% DEPENDABLE YEAR 1976-1977<br />

Period Inflow Head <strong>Power</strong> Unres Energy Energy At Different Restricted Capacities<br />

74<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project, (2 x 35 MW)<br />

CUMEC (M) IN MW (MU) 25 MW 30 MW 35 MW 40 MW 45 MW 50 MW 55 MW 60 MW 65 MW 70 MW 75 MW 80 MW 85 MW 90 MW 95 MW 100 MW 105 MW<br />

JUNE I 6.83 1106.37 65.998 15.840 5.700 6.840 7.980 9.120 10.260 11.400 12.540 13.680 14.820 15.840 15.840 15.840 15.840 15.840 15.840 15.840 15.840<br />

II 13.33 1106.37 128.807 30.914 5.700 6.840 7.980 9.120 10.260 11.400 12.540 13.680 14.820 15.960 17.100 18.240 19.380 20.520 21.660 22.800 23.940<br />

III 9.67 1106.37 93.441 22.426 5.700 6.840 7.980 9.120 10.260 11.400 12.540 13.680 14.820 15.960 17.100 18.240 19.380 20.520 21.305 22.426 22.426<br />

JULY I 12.36 1106.37 119.434 28.664 5.700 6.840 7.980 9.120 10.260 11.400 12.540 13.680 14.820 15.960 17.100 18.240 19.380 20.520 21.660 22.800 23.940<br />

II 11.78 1106.37 113.830 27.319 5.700 6.840 7.980 9.120 10.260 11.400 12.540 13.680 14.820 15.960 17.100 18.240 19.380 20.520 21.660 22.800 23.940<br />

III 8.97 1106.37 86.677 22.883 6.270 7.524 8.778 10.032 11.286 12.540 13.794 15.048 16.302 17.556 18.810 20.064 21.318 21.739 22.883 22.883 22.883<br />

AUG I 10.45 1106.37 100.978 24.235 5.700 6.840 7.980 9.120 10.260 11.400 12.540 13.680 14.820 15.960 17.100 18.240 19.380 20.520 21.660 22.800 23.023<br />

II 11.39 1106.37 110.061 26.415 5.700 6.840 7.980 9.120 10.260 11.400 12.540 13.680 14.820 15.960 17.100 18.240 19.380 20.520 21.660 22.800 23.940<br />

III 12.18 1106.37 117.695 31.071 6.270 7.524 8.778 10.032 11.286 12.540 13.794 15.048 16.302 17.556 18.810 20.064 21.318 22.572 23.826 25.080 26.334<br />

SEPT I 11.10 1106.37 107.259 25.742 5.700 6.840 7.980 9.120 10.260 11.400 12.540 13.680 14.820 15.960 17.100 18.240 19.380 20.520 21.660 22.800 23.940<br />

II 6.40 1106.37 61.843 14.842 5.700 6.840 7.980 9.120 10.260 11.400 12.540 13.680 14.100 14.842 14.842 14.842 14.842 14.842 14.842 14.842 14.842<br />

III 4.67 1106.37 45.126 10.830 5.700 6.840 7.980 9.120 10.260 10.830 10.830 10.830 10.830 10.830 10.830 10.830 10.830 10.830 10.830 10.830 10.830<br />

OCT I 3.96 1106.37 38.265 9.184 5.700 6.840 7.980 8.724 9.184 9.184 9.184 9.184 9.184 9.184 9.184 9.184 9.184 9.184 9.184 9.184 9.184<br />

II 3.13 1106.37 30.245 7.259 5.700 6.840 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259 7.259<br />

III 3.16 1106.37 30.535 8.061 6.270 7.524 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061 8.061<br />

NOV I 3.14 1106.37 30.342 7.282 5.700 6.840 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282 7.282<br />

II 2.60 1106.37 25.124 6.030 5.700 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030 6.030<br />

III 2.32 1106.37 22.418 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380 5.380<br />

DEC I 1.89 1106.37 18.263 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383 4.383<br />

II 1.62 1106.37 15.654 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757 3.757<br />

III 1.49 1106.37 14.398 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801 3.801<br />

JAN I 1.33 1106.37 12.852 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084 3.084<br />

II 1.27 1106.37 12.272 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945 2.945<br />

III 1.21 1106.37 11.692 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087 3.087<br />

FEB I 2.23 1106.37 21.548 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172 5.172<br />

II 2.17 1106.37 20.969 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032 5.032<br />

III 1.30 1106.37 12.562 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412 2.412<br />

MAR I 1.23 1106.37 11.885 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853 2.853<br />

II 1.76 1106.37 17.007 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082 4.082<br />

III 1.63 1106.37 15.751 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158 4.158<br />

APR I 2.37 1106.37 22.901 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496 5.496<br />

II 2.22 1106.37 21.452 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148 5.148<br />

III 2.36 1106.37 22.805 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473 5.473<br />

MAY I 2.58 1106.37 24.930 5.983 5.684 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983 5.983<br />

II 3.19 1106.37 30.825 7.398 5.700 6.840 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398 7.398<br />

III 4.55 1106.37 43.966 11.607 6.270 7.524 8.778 10.032 11.027 11.607 11.607 11.607 11.607 11.607 11.607 11.607 11.607 11.607 11.607 11.607 11.607<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED ON 95% M/C AVAILABILITY 410.248 182.53 204.13 222.39 238.30 253.66 267.58 280.35 293.11 305.16 317.41 327.90 338.39 348.88 358.53 368.55 377.77 384.95<br />

FRL= EL 2966<br />

MDDL= EL 2963<br />

TWL= 1853<br />

Losses= 4<br />

Overall Efficiency= 89.30%


Net Head 1106.37<br />

m<br />

Table-7.4 (B)<br />

75<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

POWER POTENTIAL STUDY OF 90% DEPENDABLE YEAR 1976-1977 WITH 95% MACHINE<br />

AVAILABILITY<br />

Period Inflow<br />

(Cume<br />

cs)<br />

JUNE<br />

JULY<br />

AUG<br />

SEPT<br />

OCT<br />

NOV<br />

DEC<br />

JAN<br />

FEB<br />

MAR<br />

APR<br />

MAY<br />

Restricted to 70<br />

MW<br />

Head<br />

(M)<br />

Unrestri<br />

cted<br />

<strong>Power</strong><br />

In Mw<br />

Design Discharge 7.24<br />

cumecs<br />

Unrestric<br />

ted<br />

Energy<br />

(Mu)<br />

<strong>Power</strong><br />

Restricted<br />

To 70 Mw<br />

Energy (Mu) At<br />

70 Mw With<br />

95% Machine<br />

Availability<br />

Overall efficiency 89.30%<br />

Energy<br />

During High<br />

Inflow Period<br />

Energy<br />

During<br />

Lean<br />

Inflow<br />

Period<br />

10 1-10 6.83 1106. 66.00 15.840 66.00 15.840 0.000 15.840<br />

10 11-20 13.33 1106. 37 128.81 30.914 70.00 15.960 15.960 0.000<br />

10 21-30 9.67 1106. 37 93.44 22.426 70.00 15.960 15.960 0.000<br />

10 1-10 12.36 1106. 37 119.43 28.664 70.00 15.960 15.960 0.000<br />

10 11-20 11.78 1106. 37 113.83 27.319 70.00 15.960 15.960 0.000<br />

11 21-31 8.97 1106. 37 86.68 22.883 70.00 17.556 17.556 0.000<br />

10 1-10 10.45 1106. 37 100.98 24.235 70.00 15.960 15.960 0.000<br />

10 11-20 11.39 1106. 37 110.06 26.415 70.00 15.960 15.960 0.000<br />

11 21-31 12.18 1106. 37 117.69 31.071 70.00 17.556 17.556 0.000<br />

10 1-10 11.10 1106. 37 107.26 25.742 70.00 15.960 15.960 0.000<br />

10 11-20 6.40 1106. 37 61.84 14.842 61.84 14.842 0.000 14.842<br />

10 21-30 4.67 1106. 37 45.13 10.830 45.13 10.830 0.000 10.830<br />

10 1-10 3.96 1106. 37 38.27 9.184 38.27 9.184 0.000 9.184<br />

10 11-20 3.13 1106. 37 30.25 7.259 30.25 7.259 0.000 7.259<br />

11 21-31 3.16 1106. 37 30.53 8.061 30.53 8.061 0.000 8.061<br />

10 1-10 3.14 1106. 37 30.34 7.282 30.34 7.282 0.000 7.282<br />

10 11-20 2.60 1106. 37 25.12 6.030 25.12 6.030 0.000 6.030<br />

10 21-30 2.32 1106. 37 22.42 5.380 22.42 5.380 0.000 5.380<br />

10 1-10 1.89 1106. 37 18.26 4.383 18.26 4.383 0.000 4.383<br />

10 11-20 1.62 1106. 37 15.65 3.757 15.65 3.757 0.000 3.757<br />

11 21-31 1.49 1106. 37 14.40 3.801 14.40 3.801 0.000 3.801<br />

10 1-10 1.33 1106. 37 12.85 3.084 12.85 3.084 0.000 3.084<br />

10 11-20 1.27 1106. 37 12.27 2.945 12.27 2.945 0.000 2.945<br />

11 21-31 1.21 1106. 37 11.69 3.087 11.69 3.087 0.000 3.087<br />

10 1-10 2.23 1106. 37 21.55 5.172 21.55 5.172 0.000 5.172<br />

10 11-20 2.17 1106. 37 20.97 5.032 20.97 5.032 0.000 5.032<br />

8 21-28 1.30 1106. 37 12.56 2.412 12.56 2.412 0.000 2.412<br />

10 1-10 1.23 1106. 37 11.89 2.853 11.89 2.853 0.000 2.853<br />

10 11-20 1.76 1106. 37 17.01 4.082 17.01 4.082 0.000 4.082<br />

11 21-31 1.63 1106. 37 15.75 4.158 15.75 4.158 0.000 4.158<br />

10 1-10 2.37 1106. 37 22.90 5.496 22.90 5.496 0.000 5.496<br />

10 11-20 2.22 1106. 37 21.45 5.148 21.45 5.148 0.000 5.148<br />

10 21-30 2.36 1106. 37 22.80 5.473 22.80 5.473 0.000 5.473<br />

10 1-10 2.58 1106. 37 24.93 5.983 24.93 5.983 0.000 5.983<br />

10 11-20 3.19 1106. 37 30.82 7.398 30.82 7.398 0.000 7.398<br />

11 21-31 4.55 1106. 37 43.97 11.607 43.97 11.607 0.000 11.607<br />

Energy obtained on 95% 37 machine availibility 317.41 146.83 170.58<br />

LOAD FACTOR 51.76 95.00 37.19


PERIOD<br />

90%<br />

DEPENDABL<br />

E FLOW<br />

(CUMECS)<br />

Table-7.5<br />

POWER GENERATION IN 90% DEPENDABLE YEAR 1976-77<br />

POWER IN MW ENERGY IN GWH<br />

RESTRICTED TO<br />

INSTALLED<br />

UN RESTRICTED<br />

UN RESTRICTED<br />

CAPACITY OF 70<br />

MW<br />

76<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

RESTRICTED<br />

TO INSTALLED<br />

CAPACITY OF 70<br />

MW<br />

MONTHLY<br />

ENERGY<br />

IN GWH<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

1-10 6.83 65.998 66.00 15.840 15.840<br />

JUN 11-20 13.33 128.807 70.00 30.914 15.960<br />

47.76<br />

21-30 9.67 93.441 70.00 22.426 15.960<br />

1-10 12.36 119.434 70.00 28.664 15.960<br />

JULY 11-20 11.78 113.830 70.00 27.319 15.960<br />

49.48<br />

21-31 8.97 86.677 70.00 22.883 17.556<br />

1-10 10.45 100.978 70.00 24.235 15.960<br />

AUG 11-20 11.39 110.061 70.00 26.415 15.960<br />

49.48<br />

21-31 12.18 117.695 70.00 31.071 17.556<br />

1-10 11.10 107.259 70.00 25.742 15.960<br />

SEPT 11-20 6.40 61.843 61.84 14.842 14.842<br />

41.63<br />

21-30 4.67 45.126 45.13 10.830 10.830<br />

1-10 3.96 38.265 38.27 9.184 9.184<br />

OCT 11-20 3.13 30.245 30.25 7.259 7.259<br />

24.50<br />

21-31 3.16 30.535 30.53 8.061 8.061<br />

1-10 3.14 30.342 30.34 7.282 7.282<br />

NOV 11-20 2.60 25.124 25.12 6.030 6.030<br />

18.69<br />

21-30 2.32 22.418 22.42 5.380 5.380<br />

1-10 1.89 18.263 18.26 4.383 4.383<br />

DEC 11-20 1.62 15.654 15.65 3.757 3.757<br />

11.94<br />

21-31 1.49 14.398 14.40 3.801 3.801<br />

1-10 1.33 12.852 12.85 3.084 3.084<br />

JAN 11-20 1.27 12.272 12.27 2.945 2.945<br />

9.12<br />

21-31 1.21 11.692 11.69 3.087 3.087<br />

1-10 2.23 21.548 21.55 5.172 5.172<br />

FEB 11-20 2.17 20.969 20.97 5.032 5.032<br />

12.62<br />

21-28 1.30 12.562 12.56 2.412 2.412<br />

1-10 1.23 11.885 11.89 2.853 2.853<br />

MAR 11-20 1.76 17.007 17.01 4.082 4.082<br />

11.09<br />

21-31 1.63 15.751 15.75 4.158 4.158<br />

1-10 2.37 22.901 22.90 5.496 5.496<br />

APR 11-20 2.22 21.452 21.45 5.148 5.148<br />

16.12<br />

21-30 2.36 22.805 22.80 5.473 5.473<br />

1-10 2.58 24.930 24.93 5.983 5.983<br />

MAY 11-20 3.19 30.825 30.82 7.398 7.398<br />

24.99<br />

21-31 4.55 43.966 43.97 11.607 11.607<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED ON 95% MACHINE AVAILABILITY 317.41


Table-7.6<br />

77<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

INCREMENTAL BENEFIT IN 90% DEPENDABLE YEAR 1976-77<br />

MW MU ? MU/? MW<br />

Load Factor<br />

(%)<br />

Annual Load Factor<br />

for additional capacity<br />

(%)<br />

25 182.53 83.35%<br />

4.32<br />

30 204.13 77.68% 49.33%<br />

3.65<br />

35 222.39 72.53% 41.68%<br />

3.18<br />

40 238.30 68.01% 36.32%<br />

3.07<br />

45 253.66 64.35% 35.07%<br />

2.78<br />

50 267.58 61.09% 31.78%<br />

2.55<br />

55 280.35 58.19% 29.15%<br />

2.55<br />

60 293.11 55.77% 29.15%<br />

2.41<br />

65 305.16 53.59% 27.51%<br />

2.45<br />

70 317.41 51.76% 27.97%<br />

2.10<br />

75 327.90 49.91% 23.95%<br />

2.10<br />

80 338.39 48.29% 23.95%<br />

2.10<br />

85 348.88 46.85% 23.95%<br />

1.93<br />

90 358.53 45.48% 22.04%<br />

2.00<br />

95 368.55 44.29% 22.88%<br />

1.84<br />

100 377.77 43.12% 21.04%<br />

1.44<br />

105 384.945 41.85% 16.39%


INCREMENTAL (DMU/DMW)<br />

4.504.32<br />

4.00<br />

3.50<br />

3.00<br />

2.50<br />

2.00<br />

1.50<br />

1.00<br />

3.65<br />

3.18<br />

RINGPI H.E.P.<br />

INCREMENTAL BENEFIT FOR 90% DEPENDABLE YEAR (1976-77)<br />

3.07<br />

2.78<br />

2.55<br />

2.55<br />

2.41<br />

2.45<br />

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110<br />

MW CAPACITY<br />

78<br />

2.10<br />

2.10<br />

2.10<br />

1.93<br />

2.00<br />

1.84<br />

1.44<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project, (2 x 35 MW)


Table-7.7 (A)<br />

79<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1976-77<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 6.83 1106.37 65.998 15.840<br />

II 13.33 1106.37 128.807 30.914<br />

III 9.67 1106.37 93.441 22.426<br />

JULY I 12.36 1106.37 119.434 28.664<br />

II 11.78 1106.37 113.830 27.319<br />

III 8.97 1106.37 86.677 22.883<br />

AUG I 10.45 1106.37 100.978 24.235<br />

II 11.39 1106.37 110.061 26.415<br />

III 12.18 1106.37 117.695 31.071<br />

SEPT I 11.10 1106.37 107.259 25.742<br />

II 6.40 1106.37 61.843 14.842<br />

III 4.67 1106.37 45.126 10.830<br />

OCT I 3.96 1106.37 38.265 9.184<br />

II 3.13 1106.37 30.245 7.259<br />

III 3.16 1106.37 30.535 8.061<br />

NOV I 3.14 1106.37 30.342 7.282<br />

II 2.60 1106.37 25.124 6.030<br />

III 2.32 1106.37 22.418 5.380<br />

DEC I 1.89 1106.37 18.263 4.383<br />

II 1.62 1106.37 15.654 3.757<br />

III 1.49 1106.37 14.398 3.801<br />

JAN I 1.33 1106.37 12.852 3.084<br />

II 1.27 1106.37 12.272 2.945<br />

III 1.21 1106.37 11.692 3.087<br />

FEB I 2.23 1106.37 21.548 5.172<br />

II 2.17 1106.37 20.969 5.032<br />

III 1.30 1106.37 12.562 2.412<br />

MAR I 1.23 1106.37 11.885 2.853<br />

II 1.76 1106.37 17.007 4.082<br />

III 1.63 1106.37 15.751 4.158<br />

APR I 2.37 1106.37 22.901 5.496<br />

II 2.22 1106.37 21.452 5.148<br />

III 2.36 1106.37 22.805 5.473<br />

MAY I 2.58 1106.37 24.930 5.983<br />

II 3.19 1106.37 30.825 7.398<br />

III 4.55 1106.37 43.966 11.607<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 410.248


Table-7.7 (B)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1977-78<br />

80<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 7.34 1106.37 70.926 17.022<br />

II 13.03 1106.37 125.908 30.218<br />

III 9.48 1106.37 91.605 21.985<br />

JULY I 10.83 1106.37 104.650 25.116<br />

II 12.47 1106.37 120.497 28.919<br />

III 15.26 1106.37 147.457 38.929<br />

AUG I 12.46 1106.37 120.400 28.896<br />

II 10.49 1106.37 101.364 24.327<br />

III 12.24 1106.37 118.275 31.225<br />

SEPT I 8.55 1106.37 82.618 19.828<br />

II 6.99 1106.37 67.544 16.211<br />

III 5.83 1106.37 56.335 13.520<br />

OCT I 7.12 1106.37 68.800 16.512<br />

II 4.49 1106.37 43.387 10.413<br />

III 3.58 1106.37 34.593 9.133<br />

NOV I 3.72 1106.37 35.946 8.627<br />

II 3.39 1106.37 32.757 7.862<br />

III 2.56 1106.37 24.737 5.937<br />

DEC I 2.31 1106.37 22.321 5.357<br />

II 2.45 1106.37 23.674 5.682<br />

III 2.77 1106.37 26.766 7.066<br />

JAN I 1.90 1106.37 18.360 4.406<br />

II 1.70 1106.37 16.427 3.942<br />

III 1.74 1106.37 16.814 4.439<br />

FEB I 1.76 1106.37 17.007 4.082<br />

II 1.72 1106.37 16.620 3.989<br />

III 1.58 1106.37 15.267 2.931<br />

MAR I 1.60 1106.37 15.461 3.711<br />

II 1.72 1106.37 16.620 3.989<br />

III 1.90 1106.37 18.360 4.847<br />

APR I 2.29 1106.37 22.128 5.311<br />

II 2.93 1106.37 28.312 6.795<br />

III 3.47 1106.37 33.530 8.047<br />

MAY I 3.95 1106.37 38.169 9.160<br />

II 8.10 1106.37 78.270 18.785<br />

III 9.46 1106.37 91.412 24.133<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 481.352


Table-7.7 (C)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1978-79<br />

81<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 10.85 1106.37 104.843 25.162<br />

II 11.38 1106.37 109.964 26.391<br />

III 14.39 1106.37 139.050 33.372<br />

JULY I 12.64 1106.37 122.140 29.314<br />

II 13.55 1106.37 130.933 31.424<br />

III 13.07 1106.37 126.295 33.342<br />

AUG I 15.47 1106.37 149.486 35.877<br />

II 13.08 1106.37 126.392 30.334<br />

III 9.82 1106.37 94.890 25.051<br />

SEPT I 8.14 1106.37 78.656 18.878<br />

II 10.60 1106.37 102.427 24.583<br />

III 7.97 1106.37 77.014 18.483<br />

OCT I 7.67 1106.37 74.115 17.788<br />

II 5.98 1106.37 57.784 13.868<br />

III 5.10 1106.37 49.281 13.010<br />

NOV I 4.08 1106.37 39.425 9.462<br />

II 3.04 1106.37 29.375 7.050<br />

III 3.00 1106.37 28.989 6.957<br />

DEC I 2.89 1106.37 27.926 6.702<br />

II 2.45 1106.37 23.674 5.682<br />

III 2.20 1106.37 21.259 5.612<br />

JAN I 2.03 1106.37 19.616 4.708<br />

II 1.87 1106.37 18.070 4.337<br />

III 1.84 1106.37 17.780 4.694<br />

FEB I 1.68 1106.37 16.234 3.896<br />

II 1.67 1106.37 16.137 3.873<br />

III 1.82 1106.37 17.587 3.377<br />

MAR I 1.87 1106.37 18.070 4.337<br />

II 1.96 1106.37 18.939 4.545<br />

III 2.41 1106.37 23.288 6.148<br />

APR I 3.55 1106.37 34.304 8.233<br />

II 3.53 1106.37 34.110 8.186<br />

III 4.43 1106.37 42.807 10.274<br />

MAY I 6.65 1106.37 64.259 15.422<br />

II 8.48 1106.37 81.942 19.666<br />

III 6.49 1106.37 62.713 16.556<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 536.593


Table-7.7 (D)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1979-80<br />

82<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 7.73 1106.37 74.695 17.927<br />

II 9.25 1106.37 89.382 21.452<br />

III 13.26 1106.37 128.131 30.751<br />

JULY I 13.77 1106.37 133.059 31.934<br />

II 13.17 1106.37 127.261 30.543<br />

III 14.76 1106.37 142.625 37.653<br />

AUG I 13.64 1106.37 131.803 31.633<br />

II 10.77 1106.37 104.070 24.977<br />

III 11.42 1106.37 110.351 29.133<br />

SEPT I 11.23 1106.37 108.515 26.044<br />

II 9.80 1106.37 94.697 22.727<br />

III 7.19 1106.37 69.477 16.674<br />

OCT I 11.98 1106.37 115.762 27.783<br />

II 8.18 1106.37 79.043 18.970<br />

III 6.13 1106.37 59.234 15.638<br />

NOV I 6.11 1106.37 59.041 14.170<br />

II 4.98 1106.37 48.122 11.549<br />

III 4.69 1106.37 45.319 10.877<br />

DEC I 4.46 1106.37 43.097 10.343<br />

II 3.68 1106.37 35.560 8.534<br />

III 3.54 1106.37 34.207 9.031<br />

JAN I 3.34 1106.37 32.274 7.746<br />

II 3.21 1106.37 31.018 7.444<br />

III 3.18 1106.37 30.728 8.112<br />

FEB I 3.06 1106.37 29.569 7.096<br />

II 3.20 1106.37 30.921 7.421<br />

III 3.41 1106.37 32.951 7.117<br />

MAR I 3.51 1106.37 33.917 8.140<br />

II 3.60 1106.37 34.787 8.349<br />

III 4.86 1106.37 46.962 12.398<br />

APR I 5.46 1106.37 52.760 12.662<br />

II 7.00 1106.37 67.641 16.234<br />

III 7.98 1106.37 77.110 18.506<br />

MAY I 7.61 1106.37 73.535 17.648<br />

II 6.51 1106.37 62.906 15.097<br />

III 6.94 1106.37 67.061 17.704<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 620.019


Table-7.7 (E)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1980-81<br />

83<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)


84<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 10.64 1106.37 102.814 24.675<br />

II 14.16 1106.37 136.828 32.839<br />

III 15.85 1106.37 153.158 36.758<br />

JULY I 16.77 1106.37 162.048 38.891<br />

II 17.17 1106.37 165.913 39.819<br />

III 17.99 1106.37 173.837 45.893<br />

AUG I 18.17 1106.37 175.576 42.138<br />

II 19.96 1106.37 192.873 46.289<br />

III 16.62 1106.37 160.598 42.398<br />

SEPT I 15.88 1106.37 153.448 36.827<br />

II 12.45 1106.37 120.304 28.873<br />

III 10.08 1106.37 97.403 23.377<br />

OCT I 7.88 1106.37 76.144 18.275<br />

II 6.77 1106.37 65.418 15.700<br />

III 6.31 1106.37 60.973 16.097<br />

NOV I 5.33 1106.37 51.504 12.361<br />

II 4.85 1106.37 46.865 11.248<br />

III 4.47 1106.37 43.193 10.366<br />

DEC I 4.15 1106.37 40.101 9.624<br />

II 3.77 1106.37 36.429 8.743<br />

III 3.43 1106.37 33.144 8.750<br />

JAN I 3.30 1106.37 31.888 7.653<br />

II 3.09 1106.37 29.859 7.166<br />

III 3.05 1106.37 29.472 7.781<br />

FEB I 2.84 1106.37 27.443 6.586<br />

II 2.92 1106.37 28.216 6.772<br />

III 3.53 1106.37 34.110 6.549<br />

MAR I 3.49 1106.37 33.724 8.094<br />

II 3.70 1106.37 35.753 8.581<br />

III 4.37 1106.37 42.227 11.148<br />

APR I 4.37 1106.37 42.227 10.135<br />

II 5.54 1106.37 53.533 12.848<br />

III 6.53 1106.37 63.099 15.144<br />

MAY I 8.01 1106.37 77.400 18.576<br />

II 8.65 1106.37 83.585 20.060<br />

III 8.39 1106.37 81.072 21.403<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 718.437


Table-7.7 (F)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1981-82<br />

85<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 9.24 1106.37 89.286 21.429<br />

II 11.05 1106.37 106.776 25.626<br />

III 15.00 1106.37 144.944 34.787<br />

JULY I 19.17 1106.37 185.239 44.457<br />

II 16.43 1106.37 158.762 38.103<br />

III 15.46 1106.37 149.389 39.439<br />

AUG I 15.07 1106.37 145.621 34.949<br />

II 15.91 1106.37 153.738 36.897<br />

III 15.46 1106.37 149.389 39.439<br />

SEPT I 14.80 1106.37 143.012 34.323<br />

II 12.69 1106.37 122.623 29.430<br />

III 10.11 1106.37 97.693 23.446<br />

OCT I 9.27 1106.37 89.576 21.498<br />

II 8.58 1106.37 82.908 19.898<br />

III 7.50 1106.37 72.472 19.133<br />

NOV I 6.39 1106.37 61.746 14.819<br />

II 5.10 1106.37 49.281 11.827<br />

III 4.22 1106.37 40.778 9.787<br />

DEC I 3.88 1106.37 37.492 8.998<br />

II 3.49 1106.37 33.724 8.094<br />

III 2.73 1106.37 26.380 6.964<br />

JAN I 2.51 1106.37 24.254 5.821<br />

II 2.79 1106.37 26.960 6.470<br />

III 2.75 1106.37 26.573 7.015<br />

FEB I 2.73 1106.37 26.380 6.331<br />

II 2.84 1106.37 27.443 6.586<br />

III 2.76 1106.37 26.670 5.121<br />

MAR I 2.87 1106.37 27.733 6.656<br />

II 3.22 1106.37 31.115 7.468<br />

III 3.83 1106.37 37.009 9.770<br />

APR I 4.82 1106.37 46.575 11.178<br />

II 4.81 1106.37 46.479 11.155<br />

III 5.33 1106.37 51.504 12.361<br />

MAY I 6.68 1106.37 64.549 15.492<br />

II 7.51 1106.37 72.569 17.417<br />

III 7.29 1106.37 70.443 18.597<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 670.779


Table-7.7 (G)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1982-83<br />

86<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 12.88 1106.37 124.459 29.870<br />

II 14.18 1106.37 137.021 32.885<br />

III 15.68 1106.37 151.515 36.364<br />

JULY I 13.77 1106.37 133.059 31.934<br />

II 15.42 1106.37 149.003 35.761<br />

III 18.19 1106.37 175.769 46.403<br />

AUG I 12.22 1106.37 118.081 28.340<br />

II 11.57 1106.37 111.800 26.832<br />

III 13.58 1106.37 131.223 34.643<br />

SEPT I 10.45 1106.37 100.978 24.235<br />

II 15.11 1106.37 146.007 35.042<br />

III 9.91 1106.37 95.760 22.982<br />

OCT I 7.02 1106.37 67.834 16.280<br />

II 5.89 1106.37 56.915 13.660<br />

III 5.68 1106.37 54.886 14.490<br />

NOV I 4.45 1106.37 43.000 10.320<br />

II 3.88 1106.37 37.492 8.998<br />

III 3.75 1106.37 36.236 8.697<br />

DEC I 3.32 1106.37 32.081 7.699<br />

II 3.02 1106.37 29.182 7.004<br />

III 2.90 1106.37 28.023 7.398<br />

JAN I 2.87 1106.37 27.733 6.656<br />

II 2.56 1106.37 24.737 5.937<br />

III 1.79 1106.37 17.297 4.566<br />

FEB I 1.63 1106.37 15.751 3.780<br />

II 1.62 1106.37 15.654 3.757<br />

III 2.25 1106.37 21.742 4.174<br />

MAR I 2.42 1106.37 23.384 5.612<br />

II 3.11 1106.37 30.052 7.212<br />

III 2.80 1106.37 27.056 7.143<br />

APR I 4.12 1106.37 39.811 9.555<br />

II 3.37 1106.37 32.564 7.815<br />

III 4.22 1106.37 40.778 9.787<br />

MAY I 6.79 1106.37 65.611 15.747<br />

II 8.14 1106.37 78.656 18.878<br />

III 10.83 1106.37 104.650 27.628<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 618.082


Table-7.7 (H)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1983-84<br />

87<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 13.61 1106.37 131.513 31.563<br />

II 13.21 1106.37 127.648 30.635<br />

III 18.43 1106.37 178.088 42.741<br />

JULY I 21.11 1106.37 203.985 48.956<br />

II 17.96 1106.37 173.547 41.651<br />

III 17.82 1106.37 172.194 45.459<br />

AUG I 14.59 1106.37 140.983 33.836<br />

II 15.47 1106.37 149.486 35.877<br />

III 18.07 1106.37 174.610 46.097<br />

SEPT I 14.52 1106.37 140.306 33.673<br />

II 16.33 1106.37 157.796 37.871<br />

III 18.84 1106.37 182.050 43.692<br />

OCT I 13.24 1106.37 127.938 30.705<br />

II 13.06 1106.37 126.198 30.288<br />

III 8.90 1106.37 86.000 22.704<br />

NOV I 7.28 1106.37 70.346 16.883<br />

II 6.68 1106.37 64.549 15.492<br />

III 5.51 1106.37 53.243 12.778<br />

DEC I 4.59 1106.37 44.353 10.645<br />

II 4.31 1106.37 41.647 9.995<br />

III 3.86 1106.37 37.299 9.847<br />

JAN I 3.44 1106.37 33.241 7.978<br />

II 3.39 1106.37 32.757 7.862<br />

III 3.02 1106.37 29.182 7.704<br />

FEB I 2.91 1106.37 28.119 6.749<br />

II 3.02 1106.37 29.182 7.004<br />

III 2.90 1106.37 28.023 6.053<br />

MAR I 6.40 1106.37 61.843 14.842<br />

II 7.15 1106.37 69.090 16.582<br />

III 7.03 1106.37 67.931 17.934<br />

APR I 7.39 1106.37 71.409 17.138<br />

II 7.88 1106.37 76.144 18.275<br />

III 7.88 1106.37 76.144 18.275<br />

MAY I 8.94 1106.37 86.387 20.733<br />

II 13.07 1106.37 126.295 30.311<br />

III 18.56 1106.37 179.345 47.347<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 876.174


Table-7.7 (I)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1984-85<br />

88<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 19.29 1106.37 186.398 44.736<br />

II 23.20 1106.37 224.181 53.803<br />

III 20.83 1106.37 201.279 48.307<br />

JULY I 23.98 1106.37 231.718 55.612<br />

II 24.06 1106.37 232.491 55.798<br />

III 25.43 1106.37 245.729 64.872<br />

AUG I 22.93 1106.37 221.572 53.177<br />

II 23.00 1106.37 222.248 53.340<br />

III 24.07 1106.37 232.587 61.403<br />

SEPT I 24.79 1106.37 239.545 57.491<br />

II 23.66 1106.37 228.626 54.870<br />

III 18.77 1106.37 181.374 43.530<br />

OCT I 15.81 1106.37 152.771 36.665<br />

II 20.05 1106.37 193.742 46.498<br />

III 15.45 1106.37 149.293 39.413<br />

NOV I 11.51 1106.37 111.221 26.693<br />

II 9.95 1106.37 96.146 23.075<br />

III 8.84 1106.37 85.421 20.501<br />

DEC I 5.67 1106.37 54.789 13.149<br />

II 5.58 1106.37 53.919 12.941<br />

III 5.60 1106.37 54.113 14.286<br />

JAN I 5.65 1106.37 54.596 13.103<br />

II 5.36 1106.37 51.793 12.430<br />

III 4.64 1106.37 44.836 11.837<br />

FEB I 5.08 1106.37 49.088 11.781<br />

II 4.64 1106.37 44.836 10.761<br />

III 5.62 1106.37 54.306 10.427<br />

MAR I 7.13 1106.37 68.897 16.535<br />

II 7.73 1106.37 74.695 17.927<br />

III 7.20 1106.37 69.573 18.367<br />

APR I 8.66 1106.37 83.681 20.083<br />

II 10.45 1106.37 100.978 24.235<br />

III 12.34 1106.37 119.241 28.618<br />

MAY I 8.88 1106.37 85.807 20.594<br />

II 10.31 1106.37 99.625 23.910<br />

III 14.36 1106.37 138.760 36.633<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 1157.401


Table-7.7 (J)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1985-86<br />

89<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 9.21 1106.37 88.996 21.359<br />

II 11.50 1106.37 111.124 26.670<br />

III 32.59 1106.37 314.916 75.580<br />

JULY I 25.70 1106.37 248.338 59.601<br />

II 33.53 1106.37 323.999 77.760<br />

III 28.20 1106.37 272.495 71.939<br />

AUG I 22.79 1106.37 220.219 52.853<br />

II 24.03 1106.37 232.201 55.728<br />

III 29.43 1106.37 284.381 75.077<br />

SEPT I 12.00 1106.37 115.956 27.829<br />

II 11.46 1106.37 110.738 26.577<br />

III 9.85 1106.37 95.180 22.843<br />

OCT I 8.26 1106.37 79.816 19.156<br />

II 7.24 1106.37 69.960 16.790<br />

III 6.20 1106.37 59.910 15.816<br />

NOV I 4.84 1106.37 46.769 11.224<br />

II 4.21 1106.37 40.681 9.763<br />

III 3.84 1106.37 37.106 8.905<br />

DEC I 3.17 1106.37 30.632 7.352<br />

II 2.87 1106.37 27.733 6.656<br />

III 2.70 1106.37 26.090 6.888<br />

JAN I 2.50 1106.37 24.157 5.798<br />

II 2.49 1106.37 24.061 5.775<br />

III 2.36 1106.37 22.805 6.020<br />

FEB I 2.38 1106.37 22.998 5.519<br />

II 2.45 1106.37 23.674 5.682<br />

III 2.81 1106.37 27.153 5.213<br />

MAR I 2.99 1106.37 28.892 6.934<br />

II 3.26 1106.37 31.501 7.560<br />

III 3.34 1106.37 32.274 8.520<br />

APR I 3.29 1106.37 31.791 7.630<br />

II 4.25 1106.37 41.068 9.856<br />

III 4.77 1106.37 46.092 11.062<br />

MAY I 4.47 1106.37 43.193 10.366<br />

II 4.75 1106.37 45.899 11.016<br />

III 5.01 1106.37 48.411 12.781<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 816.100


Table-7.7 (K)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1986-87<br />

90<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 6.09 1106.37 58.847 14.123<br />

II 10.33 1106.37 99.818 23.956<br />

III 15.30 1106.37 147.843 35.482<br />

JULY I 13.25 1106.37 128.034 30.728<br />

II 16.56 1106.37 160.019 38.404<br />

III 14.89 1106.37 143.881 37.985<br />

AUG I 13.22 1106.37 127.744 30.659<br />

II 11.36 1106.37 109.771 26.345<br />

III 12.58 1106.37 121.560 32.092<br />

SEPT I 11.04 1106.37 106.679 25.603<br />

II 13.72 1106.37 132.576 31.818<br />

III 11.17 1106.37 107.935 25.904<br />

OCT I 9.00 1106.37 86.967 20.872<br />

II 6.73 1106.37 65.032 15.608<br />

III 5.26 1106.37 50.827 13.418<br />

NOV I 4.83 1106.37 46.672 11.201<br />

II 4.30 1106.37 41.551 9.972<br />

III 3.71 1106.37 35.850 8.604<br />

DEC I 3.32 1106.37 32.081 7.699<br />

II 3.06 1106.37 29.569 7.096<br />

III 2.26 1106.37 21.838 5.765<br />

JAN I 1.97 1106.37 19.036 4.569<br />

II 1.86 1106.37 17.973 4.314<br />

III 1.74 1106.37 16.814 4.439<br />

FEB I 1.65 1106.37 15.944 3.827<br />

II 1.63 1106.37 15.751 3.780<br />

III 1.79 1106.37 17.297 3.321<br />

MAR I 1.67 1106.37 16.137 3.873<br />

II 1.99 1106.37 19.229 4.615<br />

III 2.50 1106.37 24.157 6.378<br />

APR I 4.55 1106.37 43.966 10.552<br />

II 3.18 1106.37 30.728 7.375<br />

III 4.20 1106.37 40.584 9.740<br />

MAY I 4.75 1106.37 45.899 11.016<br />

II 5.28 1106.37 51.020 12.245<br />

III 6.20 1106.37 59.910 15.816<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 559.195


Table-7.7 (L)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1987-88<br />

91<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 10.29 1106.37 99.432 23.864<br />

II 14.94 1106.37 144.365 34.648<br />

III 12.54 1106.37 121.174 29.082<br />

JULY I 14.38 1106.37 138.953 33.349<br />

II 13.75 1106.37 132.866 31.888<br />

III 15.38 1106.37 148.616 39.235<br />

AUG I 14.56 1106.37 140.693 33.766<br />

II 15.88 1106.37 153.448 36.827<br />

III 10.62 1106.37 102.621 27.092<br />

SEPT I 19.10 1106.37 184.563 44.295<br />

II 10.22 1106.37 98.755 23.701<br />

III 14.01 1106.37 135.378 32.491<br />

OCT I 8.70 1106.37 84.068 20.176<br />

II 6.48 1106.37 62.616 15.028<br />

III 5.54 1106.37 53.533 14.133<br />

NOV I 4.50 1106.37 43.483 10.436<br />

II 2.74 1106.37 26.477 6.354<br />

III 2.41 1106.37 23.288 5.589<br />

DEC I 2.27 1106.37 21.935 5.264<br />

II 2.08 1106.37 20.099 4.824<br />

III 1.90 1106.37 18.360 4.847<br />

JAN I 1.86 1106.37 17.973 4.314<br />

II 1.86 1106.37 17.973 4.314<br />

III 1.83 1106.37 17.683 4.668<br />

FEB I 1.80 1106.37 17.393 4.174<br />

II 1.88 1106.37 18.166 4.360<br />

III 2.09 1106.37 20.196 4.362<br />

MAR I 2.17 1106.37 20.969 5.032<br />

II 3.22 1106.37 31.115 7.468<br />

III 3.31 1106.37 31.984 8.444<br />

APR I 3.78 1106.37 36.526 8.766<br />

II 4.27 1106.37 41.261 9.903<br />

III 4.97 1106.37 48.025 11.526<br />

MAY I 5.08 1106.37 49.088 11.781<br />

II 7.61 1106.37 73.535 17.648<br />

III 10.08 1106.37 97.403 25.714<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 609.362


Table-7.7 (M)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1988-89<br />

92<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 8.13 1106.37 78.560 18.854<br />

II 11.76 1106.37 113.636 27.273<br />

III 12.89 1106.37 124.556 29.893<br />

JULY I 20.03 1106.37 193.549 46.452<br />

II 15.73 1106.37 151.998 36.480<br />

III 17.34 1106.37 167.556 44.235<br />

AUG I 17.21 1106.37 166.300 39.912<br />

II 15.79 1106.37 152.578 36.619<br />

III 23.96 1106.37 231.525 61.122<br />

SEPT I 11.44 1106.37 110.544 26.531<br />

II 7.72 1106.37 74.598 17.904<br />

III 8.63 1106.37 83.391 20.014<br />

OCT I 7.29 1106.37 70.443 16.906<br />

II 4.83 1106.37 46.672 11.201<br />

III 3.89 1106.37 37.589 9.923<br />

NOV I 3.21 1106.37 31.018 7.444<br />

II 2.89 1106.37 27.926 6.702<br />

III 2.70 1106.37 26.090 6.262<br />

DEC I 2.56 1106.37 24.737 5.937<br />

II 2.43 1106.37 23.481 5.635<br />

III 2.30 1106.37 22.225 5.867<br />

JAN I 1.41 1106.37 13.625 3.270<br />

II 1.37 1106.37 13.238 3.177<br />

III 1.36 1106.37 13.142 3.469<br />

FEB I 1.51 1106.37 14.591 3.502<br />

II 1.38 1106.37 13.335 3.200<br />

III 1.47 1106.37 14.205 2.727<br />

MAR I 1.67 1106.37 16.137 3.873<br />

II 1.70 1106.37 16.427 3.942<br />

III 1.75 1106.37 16.910 4.464<br />

APR I 1.82 1106.37 17.587 4.221<br />

II 2.18 1106.37 21.065 5.056<br />

III 2.61 1106.37 25.220 6.053<br />

MAY I 4.58 1106.37 44.256 10.622<br />

II 4.73 1106.37 45.706 10.969<br />

III 11.53 1106.37 111.414 29.413<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 579.126


Table-7.7 (N)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1989-90<br />

93<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 10.24 1106.37 98.949 23.748<br />

II 16.97 1106.37 163.980 39.355<br />

III 17.94 1106.37 173.353 41.605<br />

JULY I 18.27 1106.37 176.542 42.370<br />

II 17.97 1106.37 173.643 41.674<br />

III 16.73 1106.37 161.661 42.679<br />

AUG I 14.52 1106.37 140.306 33.673<br />

II 11.39 1106.37 110.061 26.415<br />

III 11.17 1106.37 107.935 28.495<br />

SEPT I 10.83 1106.37 104.650 25.116<br />

II 9.81 1106.37 94.794 22.750<br />

III 9.75 1106.37 94.214 22.611<br />

OCT I 7.70 1106.37 74.405 17.857<br />

II 6.55 1106.37 63.292 15.190<br />

III 5.33 1106.37 51.504 13.597<br />

NOV I 3.31 1106.37 31.984 7.676<br />

II 2.69 1106.37 25.993 6.238<br />

III 2.45 1106.37 23.674 5.682<br />

DEC I 2.13 1106.37 20.582 4.940<br />

II 1.85 1106.37 17.876 4.290<br />

III 1.62 1106.37 15.654 4.133<br />

JAN I 1.48 1106.37 14.301 3.432<br />

II 1.37 1106.37 13.238 3.177<br />

III 1.24 1106.37 11.982 3.163<br />

FEB I 1.22 1106.37 11.789 2.829<br />

II 1.15 1106.37 11.112 2.667<br />

III 1.11 1106.37 10.726 2.059<br />

MAR I 1.01 1106.37 9.760 2.342<br />

II 0.83 1106.37 8.020 1.925<br />

III 0.84 1106.37 8.117 2.143<br />

APR I 0.87 1106.37 8.407 2.018<br />

II 1.43 1106.37 13.818 3.316<br />

III 1.78 1106.37 17.200 4.128<br />

MAY I 2.62 1106.37 25.317 6.076<br />

II 4.62 1106.37 44.643 10.714<br />

III 5.32 1106.37 51.407 13.571<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 533.657


Table-7.7 (O)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1990-91<br />

94<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 11.23 1106.37 108.515 26.044<br />

II 10.97 1106.37 106.003 25.441<br />

III 12.82 1106.37 123.879 29.731<br />

JULY I 14.13 1106.37 136.538 32.769<br />

II 18.02 1106.37 174.127 41.790<br />

III 15.42 1106.37 149.003 39.337<br />

AUG I 13.13 1106.37 126.875 30.450<br />

II 13.34 1106.37 128.904 30.937<br />

III 11.84 1106.37 114.409 30.204<br />

SEPT I 11.36 1106.37 109.771 26.345<br />

II 10.88 1106.37 105.133 25.232<br />

III 7.58 1106.37 73.245 17.579<br />

OCT I 6.35 1106.37 61.360 14.726<br />

II 6.47 1106.37 62.519 15.005<br />

III 5.32 1106.37 51.407 13.571<br />

NOV I 3.26 1106.37 31.501 7.560<br />

II 2.43 1106.37 23.481 5.635<br />

III 2.03 1106.37 19.616 4.708<br />

DEC I 1.86 1106.37 17.973 4.314<br />

II 1.54 1106.37 14.881 3.571<br />

III 1.32 1106.37 12.755 3.367<br />

JAN I 1.34 1106.37 12.948 3.108<br />

II 1.32 1106.37 12.755 3.061<br />

III 1.30 1106.37 12.562 3.316<br />

FEB I 1.26 1106.37 12.175 2.922<br />

II 1.20 1106.37 11.596 2.783<br />

III 1.21 1106.37 11.692 2.245<br />

MAR I 1.29 1106.37 12.465 2.992<br />

II 1.47 1106.37 14.205 3.409<br />

III 1.55 1106.37 14.978 3.954<br />

APR I 4.08 1106.37 39.425 9.462<br />

II 2.32 1106.37 22.418 5.380<br />

III 2.46 1106.37 23.771 5.705<br />

MAY I 4.13 1106.37 39.908 9.578<br />

II 5.03 1106.37 48.605 11.665<br />

III 5.57 1106.37 53.823 14.209<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 512.106


Table-7.7 (P)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1991-92<br />

95<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 5.96 1106.37 57.591 13.822<br />

II 9.41 1106.37 90.928 21.823<br />

III 8.65 1106.37 83.585 20.060<br />

JULY I 9.88 1106.37 95.470 22.913<br />

II 9.63 1106.37 93.054 22.333<br />

III 10.49 1106.37 101.364 26.760<br />

AUG I 12.03 1106.37 116.245 27.899<br />

II 13.86 1106.37 133.929 32.143<br />

III 11.46 1106.37 110.738 29.235<br />

SEPT I 11.54 1106.37 111.511 26.763<br />

II 12.19 1106.37 117.791 28.270<br />

III 9.44 1106.37 91.218 21.892<br />

OCT I 7.54 1106.37 72.859 17.486<br />

II 5.98 1106.37 57.784 13.868<br />

III 4.91 1106.37 47.445 12.526<br />

NOV I 4.07 1106.37 39.328 9.439<br />

II 3.60 1106.37 34.787 8.349<br />

III 2.74 1106.37 26.477 6.354<br />

DEC I 2.31 1106.37 22.321 5.357<br />

II 1.77 1106.37 17.103 4.105<br />

III 1.56 1106.37 15.074 3.980<br />

JAN I 1.42 1106.37 13.721 3.293<br />

II 1.18 1106.37 11.402 2.737<br />

III 1.20 1106.37 11.596 3.061<br />

FEB I 1.27 1106.37 12.272 2.945<br />

II 1.22 1106.37 11.789 2.829<br />

III 1.17 1106.37 11.306 2.442<br />

MAR I 1.26 1106.37 12.175 2.922<br />

II 1.27 1106.37 12.272 2.945<br />

III 1.30 1106.37 12.562 3.316<br />

APR I 1.54 1106.37 14.881 3.571<br />

II 2.16 1106.37 20.872 5.009<br />

III 1.97 1106.37 19.036 4.569<br />

MAY I 1.94 1106.37 18.746 4.499<br />

II 2.25 1106.37 21.742 5.218<br />

III 2.26 1106.37 21.838 5.765<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 430.499


Table-7.7 (Q)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1992-93<br />

96<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 2.50 1106.37 24.157 5.798<br />

II 3.57 1106.37 34.497 8.279<br />

III 6.91 1106.37 66.771 16.025<br />

JULY I 5.94 1106.37 57.398 13.776<br />

II 6.01 1106.37 58.074 13.938<br />

III 6.82 1106.37 65.901 17.398<br />

AUG I 7.47 1106.37 72.182 17.324<br />

II 7.50 1106.37 72.472 17.393<br />

III 8.15 1106.37 78.753 20.791<br />

SEPT I 7.15 1106.37 69.090 16.582<br />

II 7.04 1106.37 68.027 16.327<br />

III 5.83 1106.37 56.335 13.520<br />

OCT I 4.40 1106.37 42.517 10.204<br />

II 3.16 1106.37 30.535 7.328<br />

III 2.69 1106.37 25.993 6.862<br />

NOV I 1.98 1106.37 19.133 4.592<br />

II 1.76 1106.37 17.007 4.082<br />

III 1.61 1106.37 15.557 3.734<br />

DEC I 1.59 1106.37 15.364 3.687<br />

II 1.38 1106.37 13.335 3.200<br />

III 1.27 1106.37 12.272 3.240<br />

JAN I 1.29 1106.37 12.465 2.992<br />

II 1.30 1106.37 12.562 3.015<br />

III 1.22 1106.37 11.789 3.112<br />

FEB I 1.18 1106.37 11.402 2.737<br />

II 1.26 1106.37 12.175 2.922<br />

III 1.21 1106.37 11.692 2.245<br />

MAR I 1.99 1106.37 19.229 4.615<br />

II 1.98 1106.37 19.133 4.592<br />

III 2.07 1106.37 20.002 5.281<br />

APR I 2.11 1106.37 20.389 4.893<br />

II 2.30 1106.37 22.225 5.334<br />

III 2.76 1106.37 26.670 6.401<br />

MAY I 3.50 1106.37 33.820 8.117<br />

II 3.15 1106.37 30.438 7.305<br />

III 3.19 1106.37 30.825 8.138<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 295.777


Table-7.7 (R)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1993-94<br />

97<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 4.10 1106.37 39.618 9.508<br />

II 5.23 1106.37 50.537 12.129<br />

III 6.73 1106.37 65.032 15.608<br />

JULY I 14.10 1106.37 136.248 32.699<br />

II 14.09 1106.37 136.151 32.676<br />

III 16.53 1106.37 159.729 42.168<br />

AUG I 18.54 1106.37 179.151 42.996<br />

II 17.57 1106.37 169.778 40.747<br />

III 16.83 1106.37 162.628 42.934<br />

SEPT I 17.71 1106.37 171.131 41.071<br />

II 14.92 1106.37 144.171 34.601<br />

III 14.10 1106.37 136.248 32.699<br />

OCT I 12.53 1106.37 121.077 29.058<br />

II 9.30 1106.37 89.866 21.568<br />

III 7.97 1106.37 77.014 20.332<br />

NOV I 6.61 1106.37 63.872 15.329<br />

II 5.83 1106.37 56.335 13.520<br />

III 5.34 1106.37 51.600 12.384<br />

DEC I 5.21 1106.37 50.344 12.083<br />

II 4.79 1106.37 46.286 11.109<br />

III 3.94 1106.37 38.072 10.051<br />

JAN I 3.71 1106.37 35.850 8.604<br />

II 3.45 1106.37 33.337 8.001<br />

III 3.49 1106.37 33.724 8.903<br />

FEB I 3.44 1106.37 33.241 7.978<br />

II 3.29 1106.37 31.791 7.630<br />

III 3.53 1106.37 34.110 6.549<br />

MAR I 3.25 1106.37 31.405 7.537<br />

II 2.93 1106.37 28.312 6.795<br />

III 3.71 1106.37 35.850 9.464<br />

APR I 3.60 1106.37 34.787 8.349<br />

II 4.51 1106.37 43.580 10.459<br />

III 4.14 1106.37 40.005 9.601<br />

MAY I 4.63 1106.37 44.740 10.737<br />

II 4.78 1106.37 46.189 11.085<br />

III 5.88 1106.37 56.818 15.000<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 661.965


Table-7.7 (S)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1994-95<br />

98<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 8.48 1106.37 81.942 19.666<br />

II 11.23 1106.37 108.515 26.044<br />

III 13.04 1106.37 126.005 30.241<br />

JULY I 11.15 1106.37 107.742 25.858<br />

II 11.82 1106.37 114.216 27.412<br />

III 12.04 1106.37 116.342 30.714<br />

AUG I 11.07 1106.37 106.969 25.673<br />

II 10.81 1106.37 104.457 25.070<br />

III 11.63 1106.37 112.380 29.668<br />

SEPT I 9.86 1106.37 95.277 22.866<br />

II 9.88 1106.37 95.470 22.913<br />

III 8.54 1106.37 82.522 19.805<br />

OCT I 6.68 1106.37 64.549 15.492<br />

II 5.94 1106.37 57.398 13.776<br />

III 5.43 1106.37 52.470 13.852<br />

NOV I 4.47 1106.37 43.193 10.366<br />

II 3.69 1106.37 35.656 8.558<br />

III 3.08 1106.37 29.762 7.143<br />

DEC I 2.97 1106.37 28.699 6.888<br />

II 2.72 1106.37 26.283 6.308<br />

III 2.57 1106.37 24.834 6.556<br />

JAN I 2.44 1106.37 23.578 5.659<br />

II 2.46 1106.37 23.771 5.705<br />

III 2.43 1106.37 23.481 6.199<br />

FEB I 2.41 1106.37 23.288 5.589<br />

II 2.41 1106.37 23.288 5.589<br />

III 2.42 1106.37 23.384 4.490<br />

MAR I 2.20 1106.37 21.259 5.102<br />

II 2.08 1106.37 20.099 4.824<br />

III 2.87 1106.37 27.733 7.321<br />

APR I 2.81 1106.37 27.153 6.517<br />

II 3.48 1106.37 33.627 8.071<br />

III 5.08 1106.37 49.088 11.781<br />

MAY I 7.41 1106.37 71.603 17.185<br />

II 11.44 1106.37 110.544 26.531<br />

III 11.05 1106.37 106.776 28.189<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 543.618


Table-7.7 (T)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1995-96<br />

99<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 12.83 1106.37 123.976 29.754<br />

II 13.72 1106.37 132.576 31.818<br />

III 13.90 1106.37 134.315 32.236<br />

JULY I 17.64 1106.37 170.455 40.909<br />

II 14.80 1106.37 143.012 34.323<br />

III 11.38 1106.37 109.964 29.031<br />

AUG I 12.43 1106.37 120.111 28.827<br />

II 12.54 1106.37 121.174 29.082<br />

III 11.14 1106.37 107.645 28.418<br />

SEPT I 10.05 1106.37 97.113 23.307<br />

II 9.00 1106.37 86.967 20.872<br />

III 8.66 1106.37 83.681 20.083<br />

OCT I 6.40 1106.37 61.843 14.842<br />

II 6.23 1106.37 60.200 14.448<br />

III 4.86 1106.37 46.962 12.398<br />

NOV I 3.16 1106.37 30.535 7.328<br />

II 3.61 1106.37 34.883 8.372<br />

III 3.63 1106.37 35.077 8.418<br />

DEC I 2.72 1106.37 26.283 6.308<br />

II 2.42 1106.37 23.384 5.612<br />

III 2.25 1106.37 21.742 5.740<br />

JAN I 1.94 1106.37 18.746 4.499<br />

II 1.93 1106.37 18.650 4.476<br />

III 2.04 1106.37 19.712 5.204<br />

FEB I 2.11 1106.37 20.389 4.893<br />

II 1.88 1106.37 18.166 4.360<br />

III 2.05 1106.37 19.809 4.279<br />

MAR I 2.09 1106.37 20.196 4.847<br />

II 2.41 1106.37 23.288 5.589<br />

III 2.57 1106.37 24.834 6.556<br />

APR I 2.37 1106.37 22.901 5.496<br />

II 2.30 1106.37 22.225 5.334<br />

III 5.12 1106.37 49.474 11.874<br />

MAY I 6.24 1106.37 60.297 14.471<br />

II 5.47 1106.37 52.856 12.686<br />

III 7.57 1106.37 73.149 19.311<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED 546.002


Table-7.7 (U)<br />

UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION IN YEAR 1996-97<br />

100<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (3 x 11 MW)<br />

PERIOD INFLOW HEAD POWER UNRESTRICTED<br />

ENERGY<br />

CUMEC (M) (MW) (MU)<br />

JUNE I 7.10 1106.37 68.607 16.466<br />

II 6.01 1106.37 58.074 13.938<br />

III 10.73 1106.37 103.684 24.884<br />

JULY I 11.93 1106.37 115.279 27.667<br />

II 12.84 1106.37 124.072 29.777<br />

III 11.43 1106.37 110.448 29.158<br />

AUG I 10.93 1106.37 105.616 25.348<br />

II 10.19 1106.37 98.466 23.632<br />

III 10.27 1106.37 99.239 26.199<br />

SEPT I 10.25 1106.37 99.045 23.771<br />

II 9.78 1106.37 94.504 22.681<br />

III 8.51 1106.37 82.232 19.736<br />

OCT I 7.48 1106.37 72.279 17.347<br />

II 6.86 1106.37 66.288 15.909<br />

III 6.13 1106.37 59.234 15.638<br />

NOV I 5.58 1106.37 53.919 12.941<br />

II 5.18 1106.37 50.054 12.013<br />

III 4.61 1106.37 44.546 10.691<br />

DEC I 3.17 1106.37 30.632 7.352<br />

II 2.87 1106.37 27.733 6.656<br />

III 2.70 1106.37 26.090 6.888<br />

JAN I 2.99 1106.37 28.892 6.934<br />

II 2.84 1106.37 27.443 6.586<br />

III 2.36 1106.37 22.805 6.020<br />

FEB I 2.88 1106.37 27.829 6.679<br />

II 2.87 1106.37 27.733 6.656<br />

III 2.25 1106.37 21.742 4.174<br />

MAR I 2.91 1106.37 28.119 6.749<br />

II 3.05 1106.37 29.472 7.073<br />

III 2.87 1106.37 27.733 7.321<br />

APR I 3.19 1106.37 30.825 7.398<br />

II 3.17 1106.37 30.632 7.352<br />

III 3.98 1106.37 38.459 9.230<br />

MAY I 3.81 1106.37 36.816 8.836<br />

II 4.38 1106.37 42.324 10.158<br />

III 6.48 1106.37 62.616 16.531<br />

ENERGY OBTAINED ON 95% M/C AVAILABILITY 506.387


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – VIII<br />

POWER EVACUATION


8.1 GENERAL<br />

CHAPTER-VIII<br />

POWER EVACUATION<br />

101<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

This chapter contains data regarding existing <strong>Power</strong> network <strong>of</strong> the Eastern region and<br />

the power evacuation arrangement required, consequent upon power generation at the<br />

proposed <strong>Ringpi</strong> Hydro Electric Project.<br />

8.2 APPRAISAL OF EXISTING POWER EVACUATION FACILITIES<br />

The nearest pooling point being proposed is a new 400/220 KV substation at Siliguri<br />

(New Jalpaiguri) where power from Tala H.E.P and Teesta stages is expected to be<br />

pooled. Adjoining to this is also a new substation <strong>of</strong> 220/132 KV level being created by<br />

WBSEB. Hence power evacuation with respect to development <strong>of</strong> national grid and<br />

consumption by the state can be considered as assured for the present project. Underlying<br />

220/132 KV 200 MVA PGCIL and 132 KV network in the entire area is available to<br />

cater for local loads.<br />

8.3 PROPOSED EVACUATION ARRANGEMENT TO THE NEAREST<br />

FACILITY<br />

After study <strong>of</strong> existing power evacuation facilities, it emerges that evacuation <strong>of</strong> power<br />

generated at <strong>Ringpi</strong> Hydro Electric Project can be done through one no. 220 kV double<br />

circuit line to be connected at the pooling point which can be assumed to come up near<br />

Teesta (II)H.E. Project about a distance <strong>of</strong> 2.0 Km The length <strong>of</strong> this 220 kV double<br />

circuit line would be approximately 36 km.


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – IX<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS


9.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

9.1.1 General<br />

CHAPTER - IX<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS<br />

102<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> H. E. Project is one <strong>of</strong> the various projects proposed in Teesta river basin in Sikkim<br />

(Fig 9.1). The National Hydroelectric <strong>Power</strong> Corporation proposes to construct a 40 m<br />

high concrete gravity dam on river <strong>Ringpi</strong> chu, just downstream to the confluence <strong>of</strong><br />

Jhumthul chu and Kishong chu in the North District <strong>of</strong> Sikkim. The underground<br />

powerhouse with an installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 70 MW would be located just upstream to the<br />

reservoir <strong>of</strong> Lingza Hydroelectric scheme. A 7 km long Head Race Tunnel and 250 m<br />

long tailrace channel would be constructed.<br />

9.1.2 Location<br />

The proposed project is located downstream to the confluence <strong>of</strong> Jumthul chu and Kishong<br />

chu in North district <strong>of</strong> Sikkim between longitude 88°26’39’’E & 88° 27’ 09’’ and latitude<br />

27°40’35’’N & 27° 36’ 21’’. This is one <strong>of</strong> the highest altitude hydroelectric schemes<br />

proposed on this river. Located between 2900 m and 3000m above MSL. The project<br />

involves construction <strong>of</strong> a diversion dam immediately downstream to the confluence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

two streams Jumthul and Kishong (Fig. 9.2). The dam site is to be located near the Tolung<br />

village in Sakyong Pentong Revenue Block at the confluence <strong>of</strong> Jumthul chu and<br />

Kishong chu (Fig. 9.2). The powerhouse is located on the right bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> chu about<br />

2 km upstream <strong>of</strong> Shabrung village. New Jalpaiguri is the nearest railhead and Bagdogra<br />

is the nearest airport. Location details <strong>of</strong> the project are as below:<br />

Town /Village : Tolung<br />

Revenue Block : Sakyong Pentong<br />

Sub-division : Mangan<br />

District : North Sikkim<br />

State : Sikkim


9.2 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT<br />

9.2.1 Climate/Meteorology<br />

103<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The climate <strong>of</strong> the State has been roughly divided into the tropical, temperate and alpine<br />

zones. For most <strong>of</strong> the period in the year, the climate is cold and humid as rainfall occurs<br />

in each month. Although there is a classification <strong>of</strong> various sorts <strong>of</strong> seasons in Sikkim, a<br />

very peculiar feature <strong>of</strong> the State is that it experiences a cold winter from end <strong>of</strong><br />

November to February and monsoons throughout the year with a little respite during May<br />

- June and October - November. The area experiences heavy rainfall due to its proximity<br />

to the Bay <strong>of</strong> Bengal. The general trend <strong>of</strong> decrease in temperature with increase in<br />

altitude holds good everywhere. Though summer is <strong>of</strong>ficially from May to October,<br />

Sikkim is almost always wet due to the heavy monsoons, with rains at times continuing<br />

for days on ends. Longest recorded nonstop rain is 11 days. September to October is<br />

autumn.<br />

9.2.1.1 Temperature<br />

Temperature varies with altitude and slope. The maximum temperature is recorded<br />

usually during July and August and minimum during December & January. Fog is a<br />

common feature in the entire State from May to September. Biting cold is experienced at<br />

high altitude places in the winter months and snowfall is also common during this period.<br />

9.2.1.2 Rainfall<br />

Rainfall is heavy and well distributed during the months from May to early October.<br />

July is the wettest month in most <strong>of</strong> the places. The intensity <strong>of</strong> rainfall during Southwest<br />

monsoon season decreases from south to north, while the distribution <strong>of</strong> winter rainfall<br />

is in the opposite order. The highest annual rainfall for the individual station may<br />

exceed 5000 mm and average number <strong>of</strong> rainy days (days with rain <strong>of</strong> 2.5 mm or more)<br />

ranges from 100 at Thangu to 184 at Gangtok.


9.2.2 Topography<br />

104<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Sikkim encompasses the Lesser Himalaya, Central Himalaya, and the Tethys Himalaya.<br />

It is essentially a mountainous State without flat piece <strong>of</strong> land <strong>of</strong> any extent anywhere.<br />

The mountains rise in elevation northward. The northern portion <strong>of</strong> the State is deeply cut<br />

into steep escarpments and except in the Lachen and Lachung valleys, is not populated.<br />

Southern Sikkim is lower, more open, and fairly well cultivated. This configuration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

State is partly due to the direction <strong>of</strong> the main drainage, which is southern. The trend <strong>of</strong><br />

the mountain system is in general east-west direction. However, the main ridges run in a<br />

more or less north-south direction. The Rangeet and the Teesta, which form the main<br />

channels <strong>of</strong> drainage, run nearly north-south. The valleys cut by these rivers and their<br />

chief feeders are very deep and are rather open towards the top, but usually attain a steep<br />

gorge like structure as they approach the bed <strong>of</strong> the rivers.<br />

9.2.3 Soils<br />

The State <strong>of</strong> Sikkim enjoys a wide range <strong>of</strong> climate, physiography, geology and<br />

vegetation which have further influenced formation <strong>of</strong> different kinds <strong>of</strong> soils that are<br />

classified under 5 broad physiographic units. Table 9.1 gives area wise details <strong>of</strong> this soil.<br />

The light textured soil and rocky areas are prone to sliding. Topsoil in most areas is rich<br />

in humus and organic matter. The water holding capacity in most area is low and has low<br />

cohesiveness. The soil is mainly coarse to fine loam in texture. Some soil has a gray<br />

tinge. The humus cover over the soil is sufficiently thick while at some places depleted in<br />

higher areas.


Table 9.1: Major physiographic units <strong>of</strong> soil in Sikkim<br />

105<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

No. Physiographic units Area (ha) % <strong>of</strong> total geographic<br />

area<br />

1 Summit & Ridge (>30%) 31459.45 4.43<br />

2<br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

2.3<br />

2.4<br />

Slide slope <strong>of</strong> hills<br />

Very steep slope (>50%)<br />

Escarpments (>50%)<br />

Steeply sloping (30-50%)<br />

Moderately sloping (15-30%)<br />

213100.01<br />

30480.73<br />

214641.28<br />

16024.82<br />

30.03<br />

4.3<br />

30.24<br />

2.26<br />

3 Valleys (


GROUP LITHOLOGY<br />

106<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Gondwana Grits, pebble cum boulder beds and carbonaceous<br />

shales with occasional coal seam, pegmatite and<br />

quartzite (tourmaline bearing)<br />

Daling Inter-bedded quartzite and chlorite sericite<br />

phyllite/schist<br />

Lingza granite.<br />

Quartzite/Biotite schist.<br />

Chungthang Interbedded quartzite and garnetiferous quartz<br />

Central Crystalline<br />

Gneissic complex<br />

(CCGC)<br />

biotite schist.<br />

Calc-silicate rock/marble.<br />

Garnet-kyanite-silimanite-biotite-quartz-schist<br />

Banded gneiss with augen gneiss and quartz-biotite<br />

gneiss.<br />

Augen gneiss<br />

The area falls within axial belt <strong>of</strong> Central Crystalline Zone <strong>of</strong> the North Sikkim<br />

Himalayas where the rock types are mainly high grade gneisses having inter-bands <strong>of</strong><br />

meta-sedimentaries represented by calc-silicate/quartzite, high-grade schist and their fine<br />

inter laminations. The meta-sedimentaies occur as enclaves in the high-grade gneisses in<br />

the area around the proposed project. Discordant tourmaline bearing quartz veins and<br />

pegmatite <strong>of</strong>ten intrudes all these rock types.<br />

9.2.5 Seismicity<br />

Sikkim is a part <strong>of</strong> active Himalayan belt, which is tectonically young. The area has<br />

experienced mild tremours in the recent past. One earthquake <strong>of</strong> magnitude 6.0 in<br />

Richter scale was recorded on November 20 th , 1980. The project area falls in Zone IV <strong>of</strong><br />

Seismic Zoning Map <strong>of</strong> India as per IS 1893 – 1984. Suitable seismic factors will be<br />

taken while designing the various components <strong>of</strong> the project.


9.2.6 Catchment Area<br />

107<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The catchment area <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu up to the dam site is 126 sq km. It is heterogeneous<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> climate, soil, landuse and vegetation. The entire area is covered with very<br />

deep valleys and steep hills with varying elevations. The hills consist <strong>of</strong> summits and<br />

ridges; slide slopes, narrow valleys, cliffs and precipitous slopes. In certain places the soil<br />

is shallow with huge formation <strong>of</strong> rocks covering the entire hillock.<br />

9.2.7 Drainage Pattern<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu rises as Jumthul Chu from Jumthul Phuk glacier at the base <strong>of</strong> Siniolchu peak<br />

(6,888 m). <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu is formed by two streams originating at high altitudes having<br />

snow/glacier catchment in their upper reaches from Jumthul Phuk glacier. Along its<br />

eastward course, Jumthul Chu is joined by Kishong Chu on its left bank to form <strong>Ringpi</strong><br />

Chhu (Fig 9.3). Kishong Chu rises in the northern part <strong>of</strong> the catchment and drains at<br />

Kishong chho, a glacial lake and contributes significantly to Jumthul Chu. Jumthul Chu<br />

descends from an altitude <strong>of</strong> 4,000m to 2,940m upto dam site, within a distance <strong>of</strong> about<br />

7.5 km with a gradient <strong>of</strong> 140m/km.<br />

9.2.8 Land Use Pattern<br />

The landuse/landcover pattern within the 7 km radius <strong>of</strong> the proposed <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E. project<br />

was interpreted and generated from LISS-III scene <strong>of</strong> Path/Row 107/051 <strong>of</strong> 19th January,<br />

2000 and PAN D scene <strong>of</strong> Path/Row 107/051 <strong>of</strong> 13th January, 2002. LISS and Pan<br />

scenes <strong>of</strong> area covering 7 km radius <strong>of</strong> the project site are given in Figures 9.4 & 9.5. The<br />

first level classified landuse/landcover map generated from these two scenes coupled<br />

with ground truthing is given in Figure 9.6. Area covered by various landuse/lancover<br />

categories is given in Table 9.1 and the percent representation <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

landuse/landcover type is shown in Figure 9.7. From the studies it is clear that the<br />

vegetation <strong>of</strong> the area concerned is typically that <strong>of</strong> high altitude Himalayan region. The<br />

predominant landuse <strong>of</strong> the area is a mixture <strong>of</strong> forests, alpine scrub, rockyland, rockfalls,<br />

moraines and snow and ice cover. The dense mixed forests, which are poorly represented


108<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

in the catchment above dam site are restricted to a few patches on the two axes <strong>of</strong><br />

Kishong Chhu and Jumthul Chhu. These dense forests occupy right and left bank slopes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the two streams, respectively. Overall the dense mixed forests occupy the lower<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the catchment downstream <strong>of</strong> the dam site constitute about 24% <strong>of</strong> the land<br />

area, while alpine/ open scrubs constitute 19% <strong>of</strong> the total land area. Rockylands and<br />

rockfalls in the catchment cover an area <strong>of</strong> about 2190 ha (11%) <strong>of</strong> land. Similarly, large<br />

areas in the catchment are either under permanent ice cover/glaciers (9%) or snow cover<br />

(21%). In addition there are glacial moraines present in this part <strong>of</strong> the catchment which<br />

constitutes about 8% <strong>of</strong> the land area. There are no human habitation sites or any<br />

managed ecosystems like agricultural fields, etc. Entire area is covered by natural<br />

ecosystems and the landscape conditions in the area are also quite natural without any<br />

human disturbance. The dense forests are present along lower reaches <strong>of</strong> Jumthul and<br />

Khishong Chhu in the north. Towards southeast and southwest the forests are represented<br />

by Tolung Reserve Forest. These forests are mostly broad-leaf forests with occasional<br />

representation <strong>of</strong> bamboo in them, particularly in the warmer areas. The areas above<br />

these dense mixed forests are represented by alpine/open scrub type <strong>of</strong> vegetation.<br />

Table 9.2: Area (ha) under different landuse/landcover categories in 7 km<br />

radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E. Scheme<br />

Landuse/landcover Area (ha)<br />

Dense Mixed Forest 4699.35<br />

Alpine Scrub 3764.28<br />

Open Scrub 1554.39<br />

Rockyland 1067.04<br />

Rockfalls 1123.60<br />

Moraines 1506.93<br />

Ice/Glacier 1850.52<br />

Snow 4078


9%<br />

109<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Figure 9.7 Percent area under various landuse/landcover categories in 7 km<br />

radius <strong>of</strong> the proposed <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E. Scheme<br />

9.2.9 Submergence<br />

The proposed dam is located at 2,960 m with riverbed level at 2,940m, dam top at 2,970<br />

m and full reservoir level (FRL) at 2,966 m. The project envisages construction <strong>of</strong> 40 m<br />

high dam, above the deepest foundation level, which would eventually result in<br />

inundation <strong>of</strong> 12.7 ha <strong>of</strong> land. The spread <strong>of</strong> reservoir is indicated in Figure 9.8. The<br />

predominant landuse in the submergence area is dense mixed forest (57%), followed by<br />

dense/ open alpine scrub (42%). The proposed project does not involve inundation <strong>of</strong> any<br />

village or human habitation.<br />

9.3 BIOTIC ENVIRONMENT<br />

9.3.1 Vegetation<br />

8%<br />

21%<br />

6%<br />

5%<br />

Dense Mixed Forest Dense Alpine Scrub Open Scrub Rockyland<br />

Rockfalls Moraines Ice/Glacier Snow<br />

Sikkim stretches from the low lands in the south with tropical climate to the mountainous<br />

regions in the north. The altitude varies right from sea level to mountain peaks covering a<br />

wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> flora and fauna. Nowhere in the world in such a small area can one find<br />

8%<br />

24%<br />

19%


110<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

flora and fauna <strong>of</strong> all varieties - Tropical to the Alpines. Sikkim's botanical and<br />

zoological richness is awe- inspiring, boasting <strong>of</strong> more than 4500 species <strong>of</strong> flowering<br />

plants. 30% <strong>of</strong> all the birds in the country is found in Sikkim.<br />

9.3.2 Flora<br />

The dam site is located in alpine montane terrain and the area here is mostly barren with<br />

thin vegetation cover. However, other areas in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the project are comprised <strong>of</strong><br />

dense mixed forests along the river course and alpine and open scrub high up on the<br />

slopes. This area experiences cool summers and severe cold winters. Owing to good<br />

moisture conditions and cool temperatures throughout the year at these altitudes the<br />

vegetation is constituted mostly by the cold temperate evergreen plant species in lower<br />

reaches and alpine scrub vegetation in upper parts. The forests are mostly confined to<br />

lower slopes in the river valley and are represented by all the physiognomic forms – trees,<br />

shrubs and herbs. The woody elements in these mixed forests are represented by<br />

Rhododendron, Litsea doshia, Neolitsea sp., Prunus cerasoides and Quercus lineata,<br />

Euonymous pendulus, Lyonia ovalifolia, Macaranga denticulata and Rhamnus virgatus.<br />

These species are commonly met with in these riverine dense forests. In the higher slopes<br />

where scrub vegetation dominates species <strong>of</strong> Rhododendron, Salix, Viburnum and several<br />

members <strong>of</strong> Rosaceae and Ericaceae are seen growing predominantly in the region. The<br />

alpine meadows harbour several species <strong>of</strong> Primulaceae, Gentianaceae, Papavaraceae,<br />

Brassicaceae, Poaceae and Juncaceae. These areas harbour some <strong>of</strong> the important<br />

endemic and endangered medicinal plant species <strong>of</strong> Himalaya. Among these species<br />

Artemisia vulgaris, Podophyllum hexandrum, Aconitum spp., Saussurea spp.,<br />

Nardostachys jatamansi, Picrorrhiza kurroa and Meconopsis spp. are noteworthy.<br />

9.3.3 Fauna and Wildlife<br />

As the project site falls within the Kanchendzonga National Park, there is a rich diversity<br />

<strong>of</strong> wildlife in and around the project site. The upper part <strong>of</strong> catchments <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> chu and<br />

Tolung (Rangyong) chu harbour several faunal species like Himalayan brown bear


111<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

(Selenarctos thibetanus), Great Tibetan sheep, Snow leopard (Panthera uncia), Bharal,<br />

Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus), Hoary-bellied squirrel (Callossciurus<br />

pygerithrus), Orange-bellied squirrel (Dremomys lokhriah), Assamese macaque (Macaca<br />

assamensis), Himalayan palm civet (Paguma larvata) and Stone marten (Martes foina).<br />

The upper reaches, i.e. the alpine areas <strong>of</strong> the catchment harbour mammalian species,<br />

which include Nayan, Bharal, Snow leopard, bear, Himalayan tahr, Barking Deer,<br />

Himalayan marmot and pikas. These animals however are not known to come down to<br />

lower altitudes i.e. 2,200 m or below. Among the various faunal species present in the<br />

catchment Panthera uncia, P. pardus, Ne<strong>of</strong>elis nebulosa, Felis bengalensis, Macaca<br />

assemensis and Cervus duvaucelli are Scheduled as threatened animals <strong>of</strong> India while<br />

Panthera tigris, Selenarctos thibetanus and Cervus duvaucelli are considered as globally<br />

threatened species.<br />

9.3.4 Aquatic Life<br />

Fish fauna <strong>of</strong> the river is comprised mainly <strong>of</strong> snow trout and minor trouts. Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

probable fish species <strong>of</strong> the area are Salmo trutta fario, Schizothrax richardsoni,<br />

Schizopyge progastus, Anguilia bengalensis, Pseudechensis sulcatus,Labeo pangusia,<br />

Glyptothorax sp.<br />

9.4 Existence <strong>of</strong> any Protected Area/Archaeological Sites<br />

The proposed project lies within the Kachendzonga National Park on its southeastern<br />

boundary. There is Tolung Gompa within the 7.0 km radius <strong>of</strong> the project. However,<br />

there are no sites or monuments <strong>of</strong> archaeological or national importance, which would<br />

be affected by the project activities directly or indirectly.<br />

9.5 PREDICTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS<br />

Based on above baseline data and project features, the potential impacts that are expected<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> the proposed project are summarized as follows:


9.5.1 Impacts on land environment<br />

112<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Sufficient land would be required for the proposed project out <strong>of</strong> which 12.7 ha would<br />

come under submergence. The acquisition <strong>of</strong> land for various project activities would<br />

also lead to cutting <strong>of</strong> vegetation on these lands. With the acquisition <strong>of</strong> forestland, the<br />

local population, dependent on these forests, might get affected. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental impacts resultant <strong>of</strong> construction work is temporary in nature rarely lasting<br />

beyond the construction period. All these issues are to be properly addressed so that the<br />

long-term effects, if any, can be minimized.<br />

9.5.2 Impacts on Water Environment<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> a reservoir replaces the river eco-system by a lacustrine ecosystem.<br />

The vector <strong>of</strong> various diseases breeds in shallow areas not very far from reservoir<br />

margins. The breeding site for mosquitoes and other vectors in impounded water is in<br />

direct proportion to the length <strong>of</strong> the shoreline. The construction <strong>of</strong> the reservoir would<br />

increase the shoreline many times as compared to the pre-project shoreline <strong>of</strong> various<br />

rivers and tributaries under submergence. Thus the construction <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

reservoir may enhance the potential breeding sites for various disease vectors.<br />

9.5.3 Impacts on Air Environment<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the proposed dam would increase dust generation in the area and<br />

some vehicular pollution. However, these would only be limited to the construction<br />

period.<br />

9.5.4 Impacts on flora and fauna<br />

Due to construction <strong>of</strong> dam about 12.7 ha <strong>of</strong> land will be inundated. The direct impact <strong>of</strong><br />

construction activity <strong>of</strong> a water resources project in a hilly terrain is generally limited to<br />

the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the construction sites. This may alter the local diversity <strong>of</strong> flora and also<br />

affect habitat available for fauna. Changes to, or loss <strong>of</strong> habitat will affect areas used for


113<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

mating, breeding, nursing, moulting, feeding, and drinking for both resident and<br />

migratory wildlife.<br />

The extent and severity <strong>of</strong> these effects will vary according to the existing habitat and<br />

the particular species involved which would be known after detailed study is done on<br />

flora and fauna during the comprehensive EIA/EMP study and suitable mitigation<br />

measures would be formulated and implemented in consultation with the State Forest<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Sikkim.<br />

9.5.5 Impacts on Avifauna<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the proposed dam will lead to formation <strong>of</strong> a reservoir, which will<br />

have a fluctuation in the water level, which precisely means the reservoir bank will<br />

remain wet throughout the year. Due to such reasons, some aquatic grasses may grow<br />

along the reservoir banks. Such conditions are generally ideal for various kinds <strong>of</strong> birds,<br />

especially water birds. However because <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> a good habitat it is quite<br />

likely that water birds will flock in this area in a large number. The birds from cold<br />

climatic areas could also use this area during the winter season.<br />

9.5.6 Impacts on Fishes<br />

A dam will fragment and isolate upstream resident fish. The resident species may<br />

congregate in the tail water release site. Fish from upstream will occasionally sweep<br />

downstream during the monsoon, stay in the tail water or swim further downstream. A<br />

dam may obstruct the route <strong>of</strong> the long and mid-distance migratory fish. There may be an<br />

impact on the fish composition due to construction <strong>of</strong> dam. A detailed fishery study<br />

would be conducted during the EIA/EMP study to determine the likely impacts and<br />

suitable mitigatory measures would be adopted.


114<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

9.6 Impacts on Socio-Economic Environment (Resettlement & Rehabilitation)<br />

Since the submergence area is small and is confined to the river gorge, no village is<br />

coming under submergence. Thus displacement is not anticipated. At present, there are<br />

small business and little employment facilities in the project area. However with the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the project new business and employment opportunities will open up for<br />

the local people which are likely to improve the economic conditions <strong>of</strong> the local people.<br />

Further, there will be development <strong>of</strong> infrastructure facilities as housing, water supply,<br />

medical facilities, schools, transportation and communications. These factors are<br />

expected to bring about positive impact on the socio-economic status <strong>of</strong> the people living<br />

in the project area.<br />

There is possibility <strong>of</strong> changes in lifestyle and cultural values <strong>of</strong> local people due to<br />

migrant worker population. However, the impact is expected to be low as the number <strong>of</strong><br />

immigrant people will be small for a project <strong>of</strong> this magnitude and most <strong>of</strong> the labourers<br />

employed in the project will be from the local population.<br />

As a part <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment Study, a detailed socio-economic<br />

survey would be carried out to determine the following:<br />

Information on various aspects <strong>of</strong> the affected population viz; demographic<br />

details, socio-economic and cultural characteristics, enumeration <strong>of</strong> personal<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> the affected population, education level and occupational pr<strong>of</strong>ile etc.<br />

Enumeration <strong>of</strong> social infrastructure and community property resources in the<br />

submergence area.<br />

Ethnographic assessment <strong>of</strong> PAFs.<br />

9.7 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANS<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is to ameliorate the<br />

negative impacts <strong>of</strong> a developmental project. The most reliable way to ensure proper<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> these management plans is to integrate the same with various<br />

processes involved during project planning, designing, construction and operation phases.


115<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Based on the assessment <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts, following management plans will be<br />

formulated:<br />

Catchment Area Treatment<br />

Compensatory Afforestation<br />

Wildlife Conservation<br />

Resettlement and Rehabilitation<br />

Public Health Management System<br />

Muck Disposal<br />

Fishery Management<br />

Restoration <strong>of</strong> Construction Area<br />

Green Belt Development<br />

Free Fuel Provision<br />

Disaster Management


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – X<br />

INFRASTRUCTURE


CHAPTER – X<br />

INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

10.1 EXISTING ACCESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES<br />

10.1.1 Road Communication<br />

122<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The project is approachable from Mangan to lingza road. The dam site is located just d/s<br />

<strong>of</strong> confluence <strong>of</strong> Jumthul chu and Kishong chu near the place called Tolung and is<br />

approachable by a foot path 17 Km from Lingza the road head . The <strong>Power</strong> house is<br />

located on the right bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu near the Place called Ishana . The <strong>Power</strong>house<br />

is approachable from Lingza by a footpath <strong>of</strong> 6.0 km from the road head. Lingza is 17<br />

Km from Magan, the head quater <strong>of</strong> North Sikkim District <strong>of</strong> Sikkim, 62 Km from<br />

Singtam (NH31A), 162 Km from NJP railway station and 163 Km from Bagdogra<br />

airport. The Lingza village is well connected form Mangan by a PWD road. . The<br />

Siliguri-Gangtok (NH-31A) and Singtam-Mangan-Sanklan state highways are being<br />

maintained by BRO. while the Lingza-Sanklan road are being maintained by state PWD.<br />

10.1.2 Housing And Community Facilities<br />

Ishna is the name <strong>of</strong> the place near to powerhouse and Tolung to Dam site where even<br />

basic facilities <strong>of</strong> health care, schooling, market, postal and telephone etc. are not<br />

available. It is therefore necessary to plan housing, <strong>of</strong>fice, recreation, store etc. for<br />

meeting the requirement <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

10.1.3 <strong>Power</strong> Availability<br />

Sikkim, at present, is dependent mainly its mini and micro hydel power stations for<br />

meeting its power demand. The total installed capacity <strong>of</strong> state at present is about 95<br />

MW. The state gets some share <strong>of</strong> power from Chukha Hydel Electric Project in Bhutan,<br />

Farakka Thermal <strong>Power</strong> Station, West Bengal and Rangit Hydel <strong>Power</strong> Project <strong>of</strong> NHPC<br />

Ltd. Teesta (V) HE Project, 510 MW being executed by NHPC in central sector is also<br />

under advance stage <strong>of</strong> construction. The existing transmission system <strong>of</strong> this state


123<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

comprises <strong>of</strong> mainly 66 KV and 11 KV transmission lines. A 132 KV S/C transmission<br />

line is being constructed from Melli border town <strong>of</strong> Sikkim-West Bengal to Ranipool. A<br />

132 KV sub station is being constructed at Melli. A substation <strong>of</strong> 2.5MVA, 66/11KV is<br />

located at Phodong near Mangan. Therefore , the necessary construction power shall be<br />

available for the execution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E. Project from some where nearby Mangan but<br />

the exact location may be decided at the time <strong>of</strong> FR/DPR.<br />

10.2 PROPOSED ACCESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES<br />

Keeping in view the available infrastructure facilities <strong>of</strong> communication,, housing and<br />

power, the requirement <strong>of</strong> the same for <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E. Project has been worked out.<br />

10.2.1 Improvement Of Existing Road And Bridges<br />

The <strong>Power</strong>house is located near the place called Ishana. The state highway having a<br />

length <strong>of</strong> 17 km from Sanklan to Lingza connects the power house by a foot path <strong>of</strong> 6<br />

Km and dam site by a foot path <strong>of</strong> 17 Km. Since the <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E. Project is on u/s <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Lingza H.E. Project, therefore it has been presumed that all the roads and bridges shall be<br />

ready upto damsite <strong>of</strong> Lingza H.E. Project.<br />

10.2.2 Construction Of Roads & Bridges<br />

The power house shall be approached from Mangan - Lingza road from left bank for<br />

which a new project road <strong>of</strong> 3.0 Km is to be constructed from the dam site <strong>of</strong> Lingza<br />

H.E. Project. The Dam site shall be approached from right .<br />

10.2.3 Accommodation For Residential Purpose<br />

To accommodate the project employees and contractors, land would be required for<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> suitable residential complexes. The residential colony for <strong>Power</strong> house<br />

shall be Ishana at and for dam site near Tolung where suitable land is available. The<br />

project colony would have accommodation for all categories <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials deployed for the<br />

construction. The strength <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficials and staff <strong>of</strong> various categories required for the


124<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

project has been worked out. Each personal would be provided with the accommodation<br />

as per the entitlement. Keeping in view the construction period and subsequent operation<br />

and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the project, it is proposed to construct about 50% <strong>of</strong> the buildings as<br />

the permanent and the remaining as temporary. This conclusion has been drawn on the<br />

basis that 50% <strong>of</strong> the staff strength would be required for maintenance and operation after<br />

the completion <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

Requirement <strong>of</strong> built up accommodation has been worked out to 2148 Sq.m <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />

built up area and 2206 Sq.m <strong>of</strong> temporary builtup area would be required. Total plinth<br />

area for residential accommodation worked out to be 4354 Sq.m,<br />

10.2.4 Accommodation For Non-Residential Purposes<br />

The <strong>of</strong>fice complexes are proposed at Ishana and Tolung. Workshops, laboratories,<br />

stores, water supply, fire stations, electrical substations etc would be accommodated in<br />

the project area.. One stockyard is proposed at railhead near new Jalpaiguri Railway<br />

station where construction materials like cement, steel and machinery and equipments<br />

would be store for further transportation to the project site, Batching and mixing plants<br />

are to be commissioned, one near dam site and the other near power house site.<br />

Accommodation required for non residential purposes have been worked out to be 7166<br />

Sq.m <strong>of</strong> which about 50% would be permanent and rest will be temporary.<br />

10.3 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES<br />

The different work sites <strong>of</strong> the project, <strong>of</strong>fices, stores, laboratories, workshop and<br />

residences would be connected through a telecommunication network. The<br />

telecommunication facilities would also be provided between the projects and outside.<br />

Therefore, an internal telephone exchange would be provided at the project for<br />

communication within and outside the project. Most parts <strong>of</strong> Sikkim are presently<br />

connected with different parts <strong>of</strong> the world through satellite telecommunication network


125<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

for which an earth satellite station with electronic exchange exists. The same network<br />

would be extended to the project area for telecommunication with outstation agencies.<br />

10.4 CONSTRUCTION POWER<br />

The construction power for the project shall be available at the time <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong><br />

the project and it is presumed that till the time some mega projects in the d/s i.e. Teesta<br />

(V), Teesta(III) and Teesta(IV) would have been commissioned and a transmission line<br />

<strong>of</strong> about 20Km may be required for arranging construction power.


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – XI<br />

CONSRUCTION PLANNING &<br />

SCHEDULE


11.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

CHAPTER –XI<br />

CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & SCHEDULE<br />

126<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The Equipment Planning & Construction Methodology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E. Project (2x35<br />

MW) in Teesta Basin Sikkim has been developed on following consideration.<br />

1. The project construction period has been considered as four years after<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> Stage I & II activities.<br />

2. Available Geological Data at PFR stage.<br />

3. Requirement <strong>of</strong> Construction Equipment has been planned to handle the quantities<br />

worked out on the basis <strong>of</strong> preliminary layout.<br />

4. Five months (May to September) rainy season has been considered while<br />

planning surface works.<br />

11.2 CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY:<br />

11.2.1 Infrastructure Works:<br />

The main infrastructure development is proposed to be carried out in period <strong>of</strong> 12<br />

months. During infrastructure period Land Acquisition, construction <strong>of</strong> approach roads,<br />

bridges& culverts, arrangement <strong>of</strong> construction power will be undertaken. Critical<br />

component <strong>of</strong> project would be started from 5 th month after construction <strong>of</strong> approach<br />

roads. Platform to accommodate batching plant, stores for construction material, site<br />

workshop, <strong>of</strong>fices and other buildings (residential/ non residential) colonies will also be<br />

developed in infrastructure period. Crawler Dozer, Loader cum Excavator, Air<br />

compressor, Road Roller etc. are proposed for deployment during infrastructure stage.<br />

11.2.2 Diversion <strong>of</strong> River<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> diversion tunnel 3.3 m finished dia., Horse shoe shaped 400 m long<br />

would be carried out by full face method. Excavation <strong>of</strong> Diversion Tunnel will be carried<br />

out by deploying single Boom drill jumbo, Jack hammers, 1.0 cum Conway mucker &


127<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

10 T Tippers.. Excavation & concreting <strong>of</strong> diversion tunnel would be completed in 10<br />

months. The concreting equipment proposed are Concrete pump, Transit mixer, shotcrete<br />

machine, Grout pump, shutters etc. Concreting requirement would be catered by the same<br />

batching & mixing Plant and Aggregate processing Plant, being proposed for Dam . U/s<br />

& D/s C<strong>of</strong>fer dam would be constructed immediately after construction <strong>of</strong> diversion<br />

tunnel in 2 months to divert the river. River bed excavation would be taken up after<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> c<strong>of</strong>fer dam.<br />

11.2.3 Concrete Dam<br />

Dam abutment stripping is proposed to be carried out in 13 months. The excavation <strong>of</strong><br />

river bed & foundation treatment would be carried out in 3 months. Excavated material<br />

will be handled by 1.0 cum Hyd. Excavator and 10T Tippers/20 T Dumpers. Concreting<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dam & HM work would be carried out in further 23 months. Concreting would be<br />

done by deploying 2 Nos. Tower crane (4.5 T at 60 m radius), 1 No. 80 cum/hr<br />

Batching& Mixing plant and 150TPH Aggregate Processing plant.<br />

11.2.4 Intake Structure, Desilting Chamber , Silt Flushing tunnel & HRT<br />

Initially excavation <strong>of</strong> adits & approaches would be carried out in 4 months.<br />

Thereafter,1 No. Intake structure having gate size <strong>of</strong> 3.3 m x3.3m, 1 No. Dufour type<br />

Desilting chambers <strong>of</strong> size 50m X6mX9m and HRT <strong>of</strong> 3.3 m dia. would be excavated in<br />

24 months . Excavation <strong>of</strong> Desilting Chamber would be taken up from intake structure.<br />

Intake tunnel would be extended upto full length <strong>of</strong> Desilting Chamber. Thereafter it will<br />

be expanded side wise to the full width <strong>of</strong> desilting chamber resulting in desilting<br />

chamber dome. Mucking <strong>of</strong> excavated material would be done through the tunnel. After<br />

the excavation <strong>of</strong> desilting chamber, concreting will be carried out. Excavation <strong>of</strong> silt<br />

flushing tunnel & gate operation chamber would be a parallel activity. The equipment to<br />

be deployed are Jack hammers, wagon drills, air compressors, skid steer loader, tippers,<br />

concrete pump, transit mixers etc.


128<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Excavation <strong>of</strong> 7.0 km long, 3.3 m finished diameter horse shoe shaped Head Race Tunnel<br />

is proposed by full face drilling & blasting method. It will be excavated through 3 nos<br />

adits. Excavation would be carried out by deploying three set <strong>of</strong> equipment i.e single<br />

boom drill jumbo, 1.0 cum Conway mucker and 10 T tipper. Concreting will be carried<br />

out by deploying concreting equipment i.e. Concrete pump, Transit Mixer etc. Concreting<br />

requirement would be catered by Batching & Mixing Plant & aggregate processing plant<br />

installed at dam site.<br />

11.2.5 Surge Shaft :<br />

For Construction <strong>of</strong> 10m diameter, 40 m high Surge Shaft, an approach to surge shaft top<br />

would be constructed in four months. After the completion <strong>of</strong> approach, Excavation <strong>of</strong><br />

surge shaft would be carried out manually in 16 months. Excavation would be carried out<br />

with the help <strong>of</strong> Jack hammers, motorized winch 10 T capacity etc.. Mucking will be<br />

done from the top. Concreting would be completed employing 2 m shutter, concrete<br />

pump, Transit Mixer & 30 cum/hr batching &mixing plant . Construction <strong>of</strong> surge shaft<br />

would be completed in 28 months.<br />

11.2.6 Pressure Shaft:<br />

Initially construction <strong>of</strong> approaches & adit would be done in 4 months. One no. 1300 m<br />

long 1.6 m dia. inclined pressure shaft, will be excavated in the same way as surge shaft<br />

by deploying Jack hammer, Motorized winch etc. However two nos. intermediate adit<br />

would be used to handle the muck. Steel liner erection & concreting will be carried out<br />

by deploying 10/20 t winches, Slipform liner etc. Construction <strong>of</strong> Pressure shaft would<br />

take around 31 months.<br />

11.2.7 <strong>Power</strong> House<br />

2 X 35 MW (70MW) underground power house (72 m X 18 m X 29 m size),<br />

Transformer Cavern & MIV would be excavated in 17 months. For excavation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Power</strong><br />

House a construction adit would be excavated up to the crown <strong>of</strong> power house. Main


129<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

access tunnel would also be excavated simultaneously. Construction adit would be<br />

extended up to full length <strong>of</strong> power House. Thereafter it will be expanded side wise to<br />

the full width <strong>of</strong> power house resulting in <strong>Power</strong> House Cavern. Mucking <strong>of</strong> excavated<br />

material would be done through the Construction adit. From <strong>Power</strong> House Cavern 2<br />

shafts <strong>of</strong> 2.0 m diameter would be excavated up to the bottom level <strong>of</strong> draft tube followed<br />

by benching <strong>of</strong> <strong>Power</strong> House cavern up to the bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>Power</strong> House. Mucking will be<br />

carried out through Main access Tunnel/TRT. The equipment to be deployed for<br />

excavation are jack hammers, wagon drills, air compressors, loader, excavators, tippers,<br />

winches etc. Concreting <strong>of</strong> <strong>Power</strong>house would be carried out in 20 months with the help<br />

<strong>of</strong> concrete pump, transit mixer etc. Concreting requirement would be catered by<br />

deploying 30 cum/hr batching & mixing plant and 50 TPH aggregate processing plant.<br />

<strong>Power</strong> house Installation & Testing <strong>of</strong> Machine would be undertaken in such a manner<br />

that Project get commissioned in 48 th month from the start <strong>of</strong> Project construction.<br />

11.2.8 Tail Race Tunnel:<br />

1 Nos. 250m long horse shoe shaped Tail Race Tunnel having 3.3 m finished diameter<br />

will be excavated by full face method. Excavation <strong>of</strong> Tail Race Tunnel would be carried<br />

out with single boom Drill Jumbo, Wagon drill, Conway mucker , 10 t tipper etc. The<br />

TRT will be excavated from 5 th month & will be completed in further 6 month. After the<br />

excavation <strong>of</strong> power house the TRT will be concreted with the help <strong>of</strong> concrete pump,<br />

Transit mixer, Batching & mixing plant & aggregate processing plant ( installed at <strong>Power</strong><br />

house).<br />

11.3 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE<br />

The schedule for stage I & II activities upto CCEA clearance and construction schedule<br />

has been prepared in the form <strong>of</strong> bar chart and placed as annexure –11.1 & 11.2<br />

respectively.


S. No.<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> works<br />

1 Preparation <strong>of</strong> stage-I activity estimates 1<br />

2 Data collec./ application for clearance from MOEF<br />

3 MOEF clearance 1<br />

4 Essent. Temp. infra./access 6<br />

5 Estab. <strong>of</strong> G&D sites, Metrological<br />

obser. And Hydrological measurement<br />

6 Essential Geological & Geo-physical<br />

exploration, Topographical surveys<br />

7 Formulation <strong>of</strong> Feasibility Report,<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> estimate for st-II activities<br />

8 EIA / EMP studies 15<br />

9 Commercial viability from CEA 1<br />

10 Vetting & sanction <strong>of</strong> st-II activity estimates 1<br />

11 Detailed Topogr./Geological/Hydro<br />

metero. & Construction material survey<br />

12 MOEF clearance 3<br />

13 Const. <strong>of</strong> resid./non resid. buildings,roads<br />

bridges and arrangement <strong>of</strong> const. <strong>Power</strong><br />

14 Preparation <strong>of</strong> Detailed Project Report<br />

and its submission<br />

Duration<br />

15 Techno Economic Clearance 3<br />

16 Pre PIB delibrations 1<br />

17 PIB Clearance 1<br />

18 CCEA Clearance (Investment Sanction) 1<br />

2<br />

24<br />

11<br />

14<br />

14<br />

19<br />

14<br />

SCHEDULE FOR STAGE-I&II ACTIVITIES (UP TO CCEA CLEARANCE)<br />

MONTHS<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40<br />

*This schedule is in accordances with three stage clearance policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ministry</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Power</strong> ,Govt. <strong>of</strong> India vide no. 16/31/2000-DO(NHPC) dated 8/6/2001<br />

129<br />

Annexure-11.1<br />

Contd.<br />

Contd.<br />

Zero date for<br />

Construction


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – XII<br />

COST ESTIMATE


CHAPTER –XII<br />

COST ESTIMATES<br />

132<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES FOR CIVIL, HYDRO-MECHANICAL,<br />

ELECTRO-MECHANICAL AND TRANSMISSION WORKS<br />

The estimate has been prepared to arrive at the capital cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> H.E. Project and is<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pre-feasibility level <strong>of</strong> accuracy. The base date <strong>of</strong> the estimate is June 2003 Price<br />

Level and the cost is expressed in Indian Rupees. The Cost Estimate is divided into<br />

Civil, Electrical and Transmission Works. For Civil Works, the sub heads are as under: -<br />

12.1 I-WORKS<br />

Under this head, provision has been made for various components <strong>of</strong> the Project as<br />

detailed hereunder.<br />

A-PRELIMINARY<br />

Under this head, provision has been made for all surveys and investigations to be<br />

conducted to arrive at the optimum <strong>of</strong> the project components.<br />

B-LAND<br />

This covers the provision for acquisition <strong>of</strong> land for construction <strong>of</strong> the project colonies,<br />

<strong>of</strong>fices and stores and compensation for trees and standing crops etc.<br />

C-WORKS<br />

This covers the cost <strong>of</strong> Diversion Tunnel , C<strong>of</strong>fer and Concrete Dam and Spillway along<br />

with associated hydro-mechanical equipment.


J-POWER PLANT CIVIL WORKS<br />

133<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

This covers the cost <strong>of</strong> project components viz. Intake Structure, Headrace Tunnel, <strong>Power</strong><br />

House and Transformer Cavern, Pressure Shaft, Surge Shaft, Tail Race Tunnel and other<br />

appurtenant works.<br />

The quantities indicated in the estimates for C - Works & J-<strong>Power</strong> Plant Civil Works<br />

(Civil & HM) are calculated from the Preliminary Engineering Drawings and as per<br />

experience <strong>of</strong> other on-going or commissioned projects. A provision has been made for<br />

contingencies.<br />

The unit rates for various items are taken as per the Guidelines issued by CEA for<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> PFRs. It has been assumed that the quarry is available at a distance <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

Kms from the work site.<br />

K-BUILDINGS<br />

Under this head provision for both residential and non-residential have been provided.<br />

Under the permanent category only those structures are included which will be<br />

subsequently utilized during the operation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the project utilities. The<br />

costs are worked out on plinth area basis prevalent in the area for the type <strong>of</strong> construction<br />

involved.<br />

O-MISCELLANEOUS<br />

Provision under this head has been made for C & J works for the Capital & running cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> Electrification, Water Supply, Sewage disposal, Fire fighting equipments, Medical<br />

assistance, Recreation, Post Office, Telephone and Telegraph Office, etc. also the<br />

Provisions are made for the Security arrangements, inspection vehicles, schools, transport<br />

<strong>of</strong> labour, Laboratory testing, R&M <strong>of</strong> Guest House and transit camps, Community<br />

center, Retrenchment compensation, photographic instruments as well as their R&M<br />

charges etc.


134<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

P-MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND Y-LOSSES ON STOCK<br />

A provision <strong>of</strong> 1% and 0.25% <strong>of</strong> C-Civil works, J-<strong>Power</strong> Plants, K-Buildings & R-<br />

Communications has been made for maintenance <strong>of</strong> works during construction period<br />

and losses on stock respectively.<br />

Q-SPECIAL TOOLS AND PLANT<br />

It is assumed that the work will be carried out through contracts and not through<br />

departmental construction. Accordingly, provision for general purpose equipment and<br />

inspection vehicles only has been made as per CWC Guidelines.<br />

R-COMMUNICATION<br />

Provision under this head covers the cost <strong>of</strong> new roads, Widening/Improvement <strong>of</strong> roads<br />

and strengthening <strong>of</strong> bridges. The cost <strong>of</strong> roads and bridges are based on the prevalent<br />

rate structure prevalent in the area <strong>of</strong> the Project, for the type <strong>of</strong> construction involved.<br />

X-ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY<br />

Provision under this head has been taken as 2% <strong>of</strong> I Works towards Bio-diversity<br />

Conservation, Creation <strong>of</strong> Green belt, Restoration <strong>of</strong> Construction Area, Catchment Area<br />

Treatment, Compensatory Afforestation etc<br />

12.2 II-ESTABLISHMENT<br />

Provision for establishment has been made at 8% <strong>of</strong> I-works minus B-Land for civil<br />

works.<br />

12.3 III-TOOLS AND PLANTS<br />

This provision is distinct from that under Q-Special T&P and is meant to cover cost <strong>of</strong><br />

survey instruments, camp equipment and other small tools and plants. The outlay is<br />

provided at 1% <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> I-works.<br />

.


12.4 IV-SUSPENSE<br />

135<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

No provision has been made under this head as all the outstanding suspense are expected<br />

to be cleared by adjustment to appropriate heads at completion <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

12.5 V-RECEIPTS AND RECOVERIES<br />

Under this provision, estimated recoveries by way <strong>of</strong> resale or transfer <strong>of</strong> equipment used<br />

in infrastructure works are provided for @ 75% <strong>of</strong> value booked under head Q-Special<br />

Tools and Plants. Also, the provision for recoveries on account <strong>of</strong> resale <strong>of</strong> DG Set and<br />

temporary buildings have been considered.<br />

12.6 ELECTRICAL WORKS AND GENERATING PLANT<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> generating plant and equipment is based on indigenous sources. The prices <strong>of</strong><br />

auxiliary equipment and services are based on prevailing market prices/costs incurred at<br />

other ongoing or commissioned projects.


136<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

ABSTRACT OF COST OF WORKS<br />

S.No Description Amount<br />

(Rs. in Crores)<br />

( June 2003 P.L.)<br />

A CIVIL WORKS<br />

1. DIRECT CHARGES<br />

I - Works<br />

A - Preliminary 4.91<br />

B - Land 13.86<br />

C - Works 93.05<br />

J - <strong>Power</strong> Plant Civil Works 159.34<br />

K - Buildings 9.34<br />

O - Miscellaneous 7.75<br />

P - Maintenance 2.93<br />

Q-Special Tools & Plants 2.84<br />

R - Communication 31.19<br />

X - Environment & Ecology 6.77<br />

Y - Losses on Stock 0.73<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> I-Works 332.72<br />

II - Establishment @ 8% <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> I-Works less B-Land 25.51<br />

III - Tools and Plants @ 1% <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> I-Works 3.33<br />

IV - Suspense 0.00<br />

V - Receipt & Recoveries (-) -2.06<br />

TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES 359.50<br />

2. INDIRECT CHARGES<br />

a) Capitalised Value <strong>of</strong> Abatement <strong>of</strong> Land Revenue 0.17<br />

b) Audit and Account Charges @1% <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> I-Works 3.33<br />

TOTAL INDIRECT CHARGES 3.50<br />

TOTAL OF DIRECT & INDIRECT CHARGES 363.00<br />

ABSTRACT :<br />

A Civil Works 363.00<br />

B Electrical Works 83.88<br />

C Transmission Works 19.16<br />

TOTAL COST 466.04<br />

C IDC 53.23<br />

D Total Cost With IDC 519.27


Sl<br />

No.<br />

1 Prefeasibility<br />

1.1 Expenditure for preparation <strong>of</strong><br />

Prefeasibility Report<br />

2.0 Preparation <strong>of</strong> Detailed Project Report<br />

2.1 Detail survey for final location <strong>of</strong> project<br />

componenets.<br />

2.2 Aerial survey, contour survey for reservoir<br />

basin including establishment <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />

benchmarks.<br />

2.3 Geological and geophyical surveys and<br />

investigation<br />

137<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

A- PRELIMINARY<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> Work Unit<br />

Rs. In lakhs<br />

Qty Rate Amount<br />

LS 14.00<br />

LS 25.00<br />

LS 20.00<br />

I) Drifting M 500 0.10 50.00<br />

ii) Geophysical LS 15.00<br />

iii) Core drilling M 300 0.10 30.00<br />

2.4 Hydrological and Metrological surveys<br />

including establishment <strong>of</strong> rain gauges/<br />

river gauges and discharge, sedimentation<br />

stations and their running charge for 1 year<br />

LS 8.00<br />

2.5 Investigations for foundation and rock<br />

testing<br />

2.6 Investigation for availability <strong>of</strong><br />

construction materials.<br />

2.7 Construction <strong>of</strong> access roads to facilitate<br />

investigations<br />

LS 6.00<br />

LS 3.50<br />

LS 7.00<br />

2.8 Model experiment. LS 8.00<br />

2.9 Computer<br />

facilities.<br />

and telecommunication LS 3.00<br />

2.10 Vehicles for inspecting <strong>of</strong>ficers for site<br />

investigations<br />

LS 20.00<br />

2.11 Camping equipment LS 2.00<br />

2.12 Preliminary soil test, establishing soil<br />

testing laboratory.<br />

LS 6.00


2.13 Consultant’s fees including charges for<br />

preliminary design work or device<br />

2.14 Training <strong>of</strong> engineers during investigation<br />

and preparation <strong>of</strong> project reports<br />

138<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

LS 15.00<br />

LS 6.00<br />

2.15 Ground water studies. LS 6.00<br />

2.16 Environment and ecological studies. LS 10.00<br />

2.17 Preparation and printing <strong>of</strong> DPR LS 10.00<br />

Total( II) 250.50<br />

3.0 Pre-Construction Stage Investigations<br />

3.1 Topographical Surveys LS 15.00<br />

3.2 Geological Investigation<br />

i) Diamond Core Drilling M 150.00 0.1 15.00<br />

ii) Exploratory Drift M 150.00 0.1 15.00<br />

iii) Excavation in trenches & pits LS 0.75<br />

iv) Testing <strong>of</strong> Samples LS 4.00<br />

3.3 Hydrological and Silt data collection - 2<br />

sites for 4 years<br />

8.00 2.00 16.00<br />

3.4 Meteorological Data Collection 2 sites for<br />

4 years<br />

3.5 Construction material survey<br />

Year 8.00 0.40 3.20<br />

i) Topographical Survey LS 5.00 0.1 0.25<br />

ii) Collection and Transportation <strong>of</strong> samples LS 3.00<br />

iii) Laboratory Testing <strong>of</strong> Samples including<br />

charges for all T&P and Machineries<br />

LS 6.00<br />

3.6 Model studies LS 15.00<br />

3.7 Seismological data collection for 4 years Year 4.00 1 4.00<br />

3.8 Survey for layout <strong>of</strong> colonies and roads<br />

I) Residential-cum-Office accomodation Sqm. 2.00 0.5 1.00<br />

ii) Batching Mixing Plant and Workshop Sqm. 1.00 0.5 0.50<br />

iii) Project and quarry site road Sqm. 0.50 0.5 0.25<br />

3.9 Workcharged establishment for unforseen<br />

works<br />

Year 4.00 2 8.00


4.0 Design & Consultancy<br />

4.1 Cost <strong>of</strong> Design Establishement including<br />

procurement <strong>of</strong> printing stationery and<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> Completion Report, History<br />

<strong>of</strong> Project etc.<br />

139<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

LS 25.00<br />

4.2 Cost <strong>of</strong> Special Studies and Designs LS 15.00<br />

4.3 Fees for Consultant and specialists LS 15.00<br />

4.4 Training <strong>of</strong> Engineers LS 5.00<br />

5.0 Equipment<br />

5.1 Drawing and Mathematical Instruments LS 10.00<br />

5.3 Survey Instruments LS 30.00<br />

5.4 Office instruments LS 20.00<br />

Total (III) 226.95<br />

Grand Total 491.45


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

140<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

B-LAND<br />

Rs. In lakhs<br />

Description Qty. Rate Unit Amount<br />

1.0 Private land Requirement<br />

Permanent residential and non residential<br />

buildings<br />

3.00 5.50 Ha 16.50<br />

Diversion tunnel 2.00 5.50 Ha 11.00<br />

Submerged in the reservior area 27.00 5.50 Ha 148.50<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> dam/ wier 8.00 5.50 Ha 44.00<br />

Construction material 2.50 5.50 Ha 13.75<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> approach Roads 74.00 5.50 Ha 407.00<br />

<strong>Power</strong> house 2.00 5.50 Ha 11.00<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> adits 3.00 5.50 Ha 16.50<br />

Switch Yard 1.50 5.50 Ha 8.25<br />

Surge Shaft 1.00 5.50 Ha 5.50<br />

Land for Misc Purpose 1.00 5.50 Ha 5.50<br />

Sub Total (1)<br />

2.0 Forest land<br />

125.00 687.50<br />

River bed 10.00 0.00 Ha 0.00<br />

Underground 4.00 0.00 Ha 0.00<br />

Sub total (2)<br />

3.0 Other Compensation<br />

14.00 0.00 0.00<br />

i) Cost <strong>of</strong> crops standing on cultivated land<br />

required @ 30% <strong>of</strong> cultivated land<br />

80 1.65 Ha 132.00<br />

ii) Compensation for trees LS 10.00<br />

iii) Compensation for relocating electric and<br />

telephone poles<br />

2.00<br />

iv) Crop Compensation for submergence LS 200.00<br />

Sub total (3) 344.00<br />

4 Land on lease/ hire for 4 Years<br />

Dumping area 0.50 2.40 Ha 1.20<br />

Dumping area for batching and mixing 0.50 2.40 Ha 1.20<br />

plant<br />

Temporary Residential and Non-<br />

Residential buildings<br />

2.00 2.40 Ha 4.80<br />

Contractors Colony 2.00 2.40 Ha 4.80<br />

Contractors Construction facilities 2.00 2.40 Ha 4.80


141<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Railway Siding Facilities 1.00 2.40 Ha 2.40<br />

Electro - Mechanical Works 1.00 2.40 Ha 2.40<br />

Hydro -Mechanical Works 1.00 2.40 Ha 2.40<br />

Total (4) 24.00<br />

Total (1+2+3+4) 1055.50<br />

Interest charges on account <strong>of</strong> award for the<br />

period taking over possession <strong>of</strong> land and<br />

date <strong>of</strong> award @ 12% per year <strong>of</strong> 25% cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> land acquisition for two years<br />

41.25<br />

Solatium charges for compulsary<br />

acquisition <strong>of</strong> land @ 30% <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

private land<br />

Provision for legal charges @ 1% on total<br />

compensation<br />

Labour and material required for<br />

measurement and demarcation <strong>of</strong> land and<br />

properties @1% <strong>of</strong> land acquision<br />

Establishment charges @ 6.25% <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>of</strong><br />

total compensation<br />

206.25<br />

10.555<br />

6.875<br />

65.97<br />

Total 1386.40


ABSTRACT OF COST OF C - WORKS<br />

142<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

S. N. Description Amount (Rs. In Lakhs)<br />

Civil HM Total<br />

1. River Diversion Works 346.95 30.56 377.51<br />

2. C<strong>of</strong>fer Dam 648.22 648.22<br />

3. Concrete Dam 5055.33 5055.33<br />

4. Spillway & Plunge Pool 2599.91 441.95 3041.86<br />

Total 8650.42 472.50 9122.92<br />

Add works tax @ 2% 173.01 9.45 182.46<br />

GRAND TOTAL 8823.42 481.95 9305.37


S.<br />

No.<br />

DIVERSION TUNNEL<br />

Description Unit Quantity Rate in<br />

Rs<br />

143<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

( Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1 Surface Excavation<br />

1.1 Common excavation Cum 15,000 125 18.75<br />

1.2 Rock excavation Cum 2,500 300 7.50<br />

2 Underground excavation Cum 6,700 1000 67.00<br />

3 Rock Support System<br />

3.1 Rock bolts M 4,500 400 18.00<br />

3.2 Steel Supports T 40 42000 16.80<br />

3.3 Shotcreting Cum 450 4000 18.00<br />

3.4 Concrete lagging Cum 100 7000 7.00<br />

4 Concrete<br />

4.1 Cement concrete lining M-20 Cum 1,250 4000 50.00<br />

4.2 M15 Cum 1,000 2930 29.30<br />

4.3 M20 Cum 100 3390 3.39<br />

4.4 M25 Cum 1,000 3610 36.10<br />

5 Reinforcement Steel T 100 27000 27.00<br />

Sub Total (A) 298.84<br />

6 Miscellaneous and Ancillary<br />

Works<br />

6.1 Various Miscellaneous works like<br />

wire mesh/steel fibre reinforcement,<br />

drilling & grouting, PVC pipes for<br />

drainage, slope protection works<br />

etc.(7% - 8% <strong>of</strong> Sub Total (A)<br />

depending upon the site conditions &<br />

7.50% 22.41<br />

type <strong>of</strong> structure)<br />

Sub Total (B) 321.25<br />

7 Instrumentation 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 3.21<br />

8 Dewatering 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 2% 6.43<br />

9 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 9.64<br />

10 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub -Total (B)<br />

2% 6.43<br />

Total 346.95


S.<br />

No.<br />

COFFER DAM<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate in<br />

Rs<br />

144<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1 Surface Excavation<br />

1.1 Common Excavation Cum 45,000 125 56.25<br />

2 Embankment Construction<br />

2.1 Earth / rock fill Cum 25000 518 129.50<br />

2.2 Impervious core Cum 11000 354 38.94<br />

2.3 Filter Cum 2500 901 22.53<br />

3 Concrete<br />

3.1 Concrete cut-<strong>of</strong>f wall Sqm 1,750 20000 350.00<br />

Sub Total (A) 597.22<br />

4 Miscellaneous<br />

4.1 Various Miscellaneous works like,<br />

drilling & grouting etc.(0.0% - 0.5%<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sub Total (A) depending upon the<br />

site conditions & type <strong>of</strong> structure)<br />

0.50% 2.99<br />

Sub Total (B) 600.20<br />

5 Dewatering 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 18.01<br />

6 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 18.01<br />

7 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub -Total (B)<br />

2% 12.00<br />

Total 648.22


S.<br />

No.<br />

CONCRETE DAM<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate in<br />

Rs<br />

145<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1 Surface Excavation<br />

1.1 Common Excavation Cum 100,000 125 125.00<br />

1.2 Rock Excavation Cum 25,000 300 75.00<br />

2 Rock Support System<br />

2.1 Rock bolts M 1,500 400 6.00<br />

2.2 Shotcrete Cum 500 4000 20.00<br />

3 Concrete<br />

3.1 M10 Cum 500 2560 12.80<br />

3.2 M15 Cum 120,000 2930 3516.00<br />

3.3 M20 Cum 15,000 3390 508.50<br />

3.4 M25 Cum 5,000 3610 180.50<br />

4 Reinforcement Steel T 300 27000 81.00<br />

Sub Total (A) 4524.80<br />

5 Miscellaneous and Ancillary<br />

Works<br />

5.1 Various Miscellaneous works like<br />

wire mesh/steel fibre reinforcement,<br />

drilling & grouting, PVC pipes, water<br />

stops, other steel works, slope<br />

protection works, road works,<br />

architectural works for dam etc.(2% -<br />

3% <strong>of</strong> Sub Total (A) depending upon<br />

the site conditions & type <strong>of</strong><br />

2.50% 113.12<br />

structure)<br />

Sub Total (B) 4637.92<br />

6 Instrumentation 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 46.38<br />

7 Dewatering 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 139.14<br />

8 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 139.14<br />

9 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub -Total (B)<br />

2% 92.76<br />

Total 5055.33


S.<br />

No.<br />

SPILLWAY<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate in<br />

Rs<br />

146<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1 Surface Excavation<br />

1.1 Common Excavation Cum 15,000 125 18.75<br />

1.2 Rock Excavation Cum 3,000 300 9.00<br />

2 Concrete<br />

2.1 M15 Cum 30,000 2930 879.00<br />

2.2 M20 Cum 2,000 3390 67.80<br />

2.3 M25 Cum 22,000 3610 794.20<br />

3 Reinforcement Steel T 2,000 27000 540.00<br />

4 Structural Steel T 150 42000 63.00<br />

Sub Total (A) 2371.75<br />

5 Miscellaneous and Ancillary<br />

Works<br />

5.1 Various Miscellaneous works like<br />

drilling & grouting, PVC pipes, water<br />

stops, other steel works, slope<br />

protection works, bridge etc.(1% -<br />

2% <strong>of</strong> Sub Total (A) depending upon<br />

the site conditions & type <strong>of</strong><br />

structure)<br />

1.50% 35.58<br />

Sub Total (B) 2407.33<br />

6 Instrumentation 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 24.07<br />

7 Dewatering 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 2% 48.15<br />

8 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 72.22<br />

9 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub -Total (B)<br />

2% 48.15<br />

Total 2599.91


J -POWER PLANT APPURTENANCES (CIVIL WORKS)<br />

147<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

S. Description Amount (Rs. in Lakhs)<br />

NO. Civil HM Total<br />

1 Intake Structure 351.45 100.70 452.14<br />

2 Desilting Chambers (Including S.F.T.) 236.41 63.63 300.04<br />

3 Adits 1533.20 16.07 1549.26<br />

4 Head Race And Tail Race Tunnel 4676.51 12.60 4689.11<br />

5 Surge Shaft 549.14 23.84 572.98<br />

6 Pressure Shafts And Penstocks 755.22 1771.35 2526.57<br />

7 <strong>Power</strong> House Complex 5007.41 5007.41<br />

8 Switchyard 523.74 523.74<br />

Total 13633.08 1988.18 15621.25<br />

Add works tax @ 2% 272.66 39.76 312.43<br />

GRAND TOTAL 13905.74 2027.94 15933.68


S.<br />

No.<br />

INTAKE STRUCTURE<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate in<br />

Rs<br />

148<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1.0 Surface Excavation<br />

1.1 Common excavation Cum 10,000 125 12.50<br />

1.2 Rock excavation Cum 2,500 300 7.50<br />

2.0 Underground excavation Cum 2,000 1000 20.00<br />

3.0 Supports System<br />

3.1 Rock bolts M 750 400 3.00<br />

3.2 Steel ribs Support T 15 42000 6.30<br />

3.3 Shotcreting Cum 50 4000 2.00<br />

3.4 Concrete Lagging Cum 75 7000 5.25<br />

4.0 Concrete<br />

4.1 M15 Cum 500 2930 14.65<br />

4.2 M25 Cum 4,000 3610 144.40<br />

5.0 Reinforcement Steel T 400 27000 108.00<br />

Sub Total (A) 323.60<br />

6.0 Miscellaneous and Ancillary<br />

Works<br />

6.1 Various Miscellaneous works like<br />

drilling & grouting,<br />

wiremeshreinforcement, slope<br />

protection works, other steel works,<br />

etc.(1% - 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub Total (A)<br />

depending upon the site conditions &<br />

type <strong>of</strong> structure)<br />

1.50% 4.85<br />

Sub Total (B) 328.45<br />

7.0 Instrumentation 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 3.28<br />

8.0 Dewatering 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 3.28<br />

9.0 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 9.85<br />

10.0 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub -Total (B)<br />

2% 6.57<br />

Total 351.45


S.<br />

No.<br />

DESILTING CHAMBERS (INCLUDING S.F.T.)<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate in<br />

Rs<br />

149<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1 Surface Excavation<br />

1.1 Common excavation Cum 4,000 125 5.00<br />

1.2 Rock excavation Cum 2,000 300 6.00<br />

2 Underground excavation Cum 4,000 1000 40.00<br />

3 Rock Support System<br />

3.1 Rock bolts M 8,000 400 32.00<br />

3.2 Steel Supports T 50 42000 21.00<br />

3.3 Shotcreting Cum 300 4000 12.00<br />

3.4 Concrete Lagging Cum 60 7000 4.20<br />

4 Concrete<br />

4.1 M15 Cum 1,000 2930 29.30<br />

4.2 M20 Cum 500 3390 16.95<br />

4.3 M25 Cum 500 3610 18.05<br />

5 Reinforcement Steel T 100 27000 27.00<br />

Sub Total (A) 211.50<br />

6 Miscellaneous and Ancillary<br />

Works<br />

6.1 Various Miscellaneous works like<br />

wiremesh/steel reinforcement,<br />

drilling & grouting works, etc.(3% -<br />

4% <strong>of</strong> Sub Total (A) depending upon<br />

the site conditions & type <strong>of</strong><br />

3.50% 7.40<br />

structure)<br />

Sub Total (B) 218.90<br />

7 Instrumentation 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 2.19<br />

8 Dewatering 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 2% 4.38<br />

9 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 6.57<br />

10 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub -Total (B)<br />

2% 4.38<br />

Total 236.41


S.<br />

No.<br />

ADITS<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate in<br />

Rs<br />

150<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1 Surface Excavation<br />

1.1 Common excavation Cum 30,000 125 37.50<br />

1.2 Rock excavation Cum 6,000 300 18.00<br />

2 Underground excavation<br />

2.1 Excavation <strong>of</strong> adits Cum 50,000 1000 500.00<br />

3 Supports System<br />

3.1 Rock bolts M 30,000 400 120.00<br />

3.2 Steel ribs Support T 250 42000 105.00<br />

3.3 Shotcreting Cum 3,000 4000 120.00<br />

3.4 Concrete lagging Cum 1,000 7000 70.00<br />

4 Concrete<br />

4.1 Cement concrete lining M-20 Cum 1,200 4000 48.00<br />

4.2 M15 Cum 5,000 2930 146.50<br />

4.3 M20 Cum 2,000 3390 67.80<br />

4.4 M25 Cum 2,200 3610 79.42<br />

5 Reinforcement Steel T 220 27000 59.40<br />

Sub Total (A) 1371.62<br />

6 Miscellaneous and Ancillary<br />

Works<br />

6.1 Various Miscellaneous works like<br />

wiremesh/steel reinforcement,<br />

drilling & grouting, PVC pipes for<br />

drainage etc.(3% -4% <strong>of</strong> Sub Total<br />

(A) depending upon the site<br />

3.50% 48.01<br />

conditions & type <strong>of</strong> structure)<br />

Sub Total (B) <strong>of</strong> 1 to 6 1419.63<br />

7 Instrumentation 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 14.20<br />

8 Dewatering 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 2% 28.39<br />

9 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 42.59<br />

10 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub -Total (B)<br />

2% 28.39<br />

Total 1533.20


S.<br />

No.<br />

HEAD RACE AND TAIL RACE TUNNEL<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate in<br />

Rs<br />

151<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1 Surface Excavation<br />

1.1 Common excavation Cum 4,000 125 5.00<br />

1.2 Rock excavation Cum 1,000 300 3.00<br />

2 Underground excavation Cum 130,000 1000 1300.00<br />

3 Rock Support System<br />

3.1 Rock bolts M 95,000 400 380.00<br />

3.2 Steel Supports T 700 42000 294.00<br />

3.3 Shotcreting Cum 8,400 4000 336.00<br />

3.4 Concrete lagging Cum 1,700 7000 119.00<br />

4 Concrete<br />

4.1 Cement concrete lining M-20 Cum 24,000 4000 960.00<br />

4.2 M15 Cum 18,000 2930 527.40<br />

4.3 M25 Cum 1,000 3610 36.10<br />

5 Reinforcement Steel T 250 27000 67.50<br />

Sub Total (A) 4028.00<br />

6 Miscellaneous and Ancillary<br />

Works<br />

6.1 Various Miscellaneous works like<br />

wiremesh/steel reinforcement,<br />

drilling & grouting, PVC pipes for<br />

drainage etc.(7% - 8% <strong>of</strong> Sub Total<br />

(A) depending upon the site<br />

7.50% 302.10<br />

conditions & type <strong>of</strong> structure)<br />

Sub Total (B) 4330.10<br />

7 Instrumentation 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 43.30<br />

8 Dewatering 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 2% 86.60<br />

9 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 129.90<br />

10 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub -Total (B)<br />

2% 86.60<br />

Total 4676.51


S.<br />

No.<br />

SURGE SHAFT<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate<br />

in Rs<br />

152<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1 Surface Excavation<br />

1.1 Common Excavation Cum 50000 125 62.50<br />

1.2 Rock excavation Cum 5000 300 15.00<br />

2 Underground excavation<br />

2.1 Surge shaft excavation Cum 5000 1,200 60.00<br />

2.2 Surge shaft excavation with raise borer Cum 140 1,500 2.10<br />

2.3 Concrete Lagging Cum 100 7,000 7.00<br />

3 Support System<br />

3.1 Rock bolts M 15000 400 60.00<br />

3.2 Steel ribs Support T 30 42,000 12.60<br />

3.3 Shotcreting Cum 600 4,000 24.00<br />

4 Concrete<br />

4.1 M-20 Cum 4000 3,390 135.60<br />

4.2 M-25 Cum 1500 3,610 54.15<br />

5 Steel Works<br />

5.1 Deformed Reinforcement Steel T 200 27,000 54.00<br />

5.2 Steel liner T 20 70,000 14.00<br />

Sub Total (A) 500.95<br />

6 Miscellaneous<br />

6.1 Various Miscellaneous works like drilling &<br />

grouting,wiremesh reinforcement, airvent<br />

pipe, lift arrangement, other steel works<br />

etc.(1-2% <strong>of</strong> Sub Total (A) depending upon<br />

the site conditions & type <strong>of</strong> structure)<br />

1.50% 7.51<br />

Sub Total (B) <strong>of</strong> 1 to 6 508.46<br />

7 Instrumentation 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 5.08<br />

8 Dewatering 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 2% 10.17<br />

9 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 15.25<br />

10 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -<br />

Total (B)<br />

2% 10.17<br />

Total 549.14


S.<br />

No.<br />

PRESSURE SHAFTS AND PENSTOCKS<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate in<br />

Rs<br />

153<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1 Underground excavation Cum 13500 1200 162.00<br />

2 Supports System<br />

2.1 Rock bolts M 13,000 400 52.00<br />

2.2 Steel ribs Support T 150 42000 63.00<br />

2.3 Shotcreting Cum 1,500 4000 60.00<br />

3 Concrete<br />

3.1 M15 backfill concrete Cum 12,000 2930 351.60<br />

Sub Total (A) 688.60<br />

4 Miscellaneous and Ancillary works<br />

4.1 Various Miscellaneous works like<br />

drilling & grouting,wiremesh<br />

reinforcement, swellex anchors<br />

etc.(2-3% <strong>of</strong> Sub Total (A)<br />

depending upon the site conditions &<br />

type <strong>of</strong> structure)<br />

2.50% 17.215<br />

Sub Total (B) 705.82<br />

5 Instrumentation 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 7.06<br />

6 Dewatering 1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 7.06<br />

7 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 21.17<br />

8 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub -Total (B)<br />

2% 14.12<br />

Total 755.22


S.<br />

No.<br />

POWER HOUSE COMPLEX<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate<br />

in Rs<br />

1 Under Ground Excavation<br />

1.1 Excavation <strong>of</strong> PH cavern, transformer cum<br />

MIV cavern and draft tube gate<br />

154<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

Cum 90,000 1000 900.00<br />

2 Supports System<br />

2.1 Rock bolts M 50,000 400 200.00<br />

2.2 Steel ribs Support T 150 42000 63.00<br />

2.3 Shotcreting Cum 4,000 4000 160.00<br />

3 Concrete<br />

3.1 M15 backfill concrete Cum 4,000 2930 117.20<br />

3.2 Concrete lining M20 Cum 1,700 3390 57.63<br />

3.3 M25 Cum 40,000 3610 1444.00<br />

4 Reinforcement steel T 5,000 27000 1350.00<br />

5 Structural Steel for ro<strong>of</strong> trusses T 250 42000 105.00<br />

6 Masonry<br />

6.1 Stone Cum 500 2000 10.00<br />

6.2 Brick Cum 1500 2000 30.00<br />

Sub Total (A) 4436.83<br />

7 Miscellaneous<br />

7.1 Various Miscellaneous works like site<br />

clearance, drilling &<br />

grouting,wiremesh/steel reinforcement,<br />

flooring, water fp<strong>of</strong>fing system, swellex<br />

anchor, doors, window, painting, lift<br />

arrangement, architectural works , other<br />

metal works etc.(4-5% <strong>of</strong> Sub Total (A)<br />

depending upon the site conditions & type<br />

4.50% 199.66<br />

<strong>of</strong> structure)<br />

Sub Total (B) 4636.49<br />

8 Instrumentation(1% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 1% 46.365<br />

9 Dewatering 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 2% 92.73<br />

10 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 139.09<br />

11 Work Charged Establishment 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -<br />

Total (B)<br />

2% 92.73<br />

Total 5007.41


S.<br />

No.<br />

SWITCHYARD<br />

DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. Rate in<br />

Rs<br />

155<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs. in<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1 Surface Excavation<br />

1.1 Common excavation Cum 100,000 125 125.00<br />

1.1 Rock excavation Cum 5,000 300 15.00<br />

2 Supports System<br />

2.1 Rock bolts M 1,000 400 4.00<br />

2.2 Shotcreting Cum 50 4000 2.00<br />

3 Earthwork in filling Cum 35,000 342 119.70<br />

4 Concrete<br />

4.1 M15 Cum 1,500 2930 43.95<br />

4.2 M20 Cum 1,500 3390 50.85<br />

4.2 M25 Cum 1,500 3610 54.15<br />

5 Deformed Reinforcement Steel T 125 27000 33.75<br />

6 Stone/Brick Masonry Cum 1,000 2000 20.00<br />

Sub Total (A) <strong>of</strong> 1 to 6 468.40<br />

7 Miscellaneous<br />

7.1 Various Miscellaneous works like<br />

site clearance, PVC pipes, control<br />

block building works like flooring,<br />

doors, windowsets including water<br />

supply and sewerage, boulder<br />

pitching, metal works, etc.(4-5% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub Total (A) depending upon the<br />

site conditions & type <strong>of</strong> structure)<br />

4.50% 21.08<br />

Sub Total (B) <strong>of</strong> 1 to 8 489.48<br />

8 Dewatering 2% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 2% 9.7896<br />

9 Contingencies 3% <strong>of</strong> Sub -Total (B) 3% 14.684<br />

10 Work Charged Establishment2% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sub -Total (B)<br />

2% 9.7896<br />

Total 523.74


S.<br />

No.<br />

HYDRO MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT<br />

Detail <strong>of</strong> Items Unit Qnty. Rate<br />

in Rs.<br />

1 Diversion tunnel gate<br />

Gate (Fixed wheel type) including ballast (3.3m<br />

x 4m)- 1 No.<br />

156<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Amount<br />

in Lakh<br />

Rs.<br />

Ton 16 60000 9.60<br />

Embedded Parts - 1 Set Ton 5 50000 2.50<br />

Ropedrum hoist 40 T Capacity-1set Ton 12 100000 12.00<br />

Hoist Supporting structure and trestle - 1set Ton 10 50000 5.00<br />

2 Spillway structure<br />

a) Radial Gates (4m x 9.0m) - 3 Nos. Ton 120 100000 120.00<br />

b) Embedded Parts (including anchorages, hoist<br />

structure) including breast wall liners - 3 Set<br />

Ton 90 50000 45.00<br />

c) Hydraulic Hoist (One power pack + Two<br />

cylinders <strong>of</strong> 50T capacity/cylinder with<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> 25% pushing force)<br />

d) Portable oil filter unit along with<br />

Contamination checking kit & Low vacuum<br />

dehydration and degassification unit<br />

e) Portable trolley mounted gasoline engine<br />

operated power pack<br />

f) Spillway Stoplog ( Slide type) including ballast<br />

4.0m x 9 m -1 Set consisting 3 units<br />

Set 3 4500000 135.00<br />

Set 1 500000 5.00<br />

Set 1 750000 7.50<br />

Ton 24 60000 14.40<br />

g) Embedded Parts - 3 Set Ton 21 50000 10.50<br />

h) Gantry crane 20 T capacity Set 1 2000000 20.00<br />

i) Lifting Beam-1set Ton 2 50000 1.00<br />

3 Instruments and Remote Control Set 1 5000000 50.00<br />

4 D G Set 250 KVA Set 1 1250000 12.50<br />

5 Intake structure<br />

a) TrashRacks and Embedded parts (6m x 14m) -<br />

1 No.<br />

Ton 25 50000 12.50<br />

b) Trash rack cleaning machine Set 1 5000000 50.00<br />

c) Intake gate(fixed wheel type) including ballast<br />

(3.3m x 3.3m) - 1No.<br />

Ton 13 60000 7.80<br />

d) Embedded Parts - 1 Set Ton 4 50000 2.00<br />

e) Rope drum hoist 25T Cap.-1set Ton 10 100000 10.00<br />

f) Hoist platform and trestle-1set Ton 5 50000 2.50


g) Bulkhead Gate (Slide Type) including ballast<br />

3.3m x3.3m - 1 No.<br />

157<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Ton 6 60000 3.60<br />

h) Embedded Parts - 1 Set Ton 2 50000 1.00<br />

i) Rope drum hoist 15T Cap.-1set Ton 5 100000 5.00<br />

j) Hoist platform and trestle-1set Ton 3 50000 1.50<br />

6 Desilting Chamber Gates<br />

a) Desilting Chamber Gate (Slide Type) including<br />

ballast 3.3m x3.3m - 1 No.<br />

Ton 6 60000 3.60<br />

b) Embedded parts - 1 Set Ton 2 50000 1.00<br />

c) Rope drum hoist 15T Cap. Including Hoist<br />

flatform-1set<br />

Ton 7 100000 7.00<br />

7 Silt Flushing Gates (Slide Type)<br />

a) Gates (Service & Emergency) 1.5m x1.5m - 2<br />

Nos.<br />

Ton 4 100000 4.00<br />

b) Embedded parts (including bonnet, bonnet<br />

cover,gate body liner etc.)-2Set<br />

Ton 34 50000 17.00<br />

c) Hydraulic Hoist 65T Cap. (Two Double acting<br />

cylinder and one power pack)<br />

Set 1 2800000 28.00<br />

8 Surge shaft gate<br />

a) Gate(Slide Type) 3.3m x 3.3m - 1 No. Ton 12 60000 7.20<br />

b) Embedded parts - 1 Set Ton 10 50000 5.00<br />

c) Rope drum hoist 25T Cap.-1set Ton 8 100000 8.00<br />

d) Hoist platform and trestle-1set Ton 5 50000 2.50<br />

9 Tailrace Gate<br />

a) Gate (Fixed Wheel type) 3.3m x 3.3m - 1 No. Ton 5 60000 3.00<br />

b) Embedded Parts including Hoist supporting Ton 3 50000 1.50<br />

structure - 1 Set<br />

c) Monorail hoist 10T Cap. Set 1 750000 7.50<br />

10 Pressure shaft steel Liner<br />

a) Steel Liner - 1 No. (ASTM A 537 Cl. 1 ) Ton 2300 70000 1610.00<br />

b) Bifurcation (ASTM A 517 Gr. F ) - 1. Nos. Ton 100 77000 77.00<br />

11 Adit Gates<br />

a) Adit gates (2.5m x2.5m) - 3 Nos. Ton 18 60000 10.80<br />

b) Embedded Parts -3 Set Ton 9 50000 4.50<br />

2343.50<br />

12 contingency @ 5% For Spare parts,bypass<br />

valves etc<br />

5% 117.18<br />

Total 2460.68


Sl<br />

No<br />

158<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

K-BUILDINGS<br />

Description Plinth Area(Sqm).<br />

Rs. In lakhs<br />

Rate Unit Amount<br />

1.0 Residential Buildings<br />

1.1 Residential permanent buildings 2148 0.075 Sqm 161.10<br />

Service Charges @ 31% 49.94<br />

1.2 Residential temporary buildings<br />

2206 0.065 Sqm 143.39<br />

Service Charges @ 27% 38.72<br />

Total (Residential) 4354 393.15<br />

2.0 Non-Residential Buildings<br />

2.1 Non residential permanent<br />

buildings<br />

3591 0.065 Sqm 233.42<br />

Service Charges @ 22.5% 52.52<br />

2.2 Non residential and other purposes<br />

temporary buildings<br />

3575 0.055 Sqm 196.63<br />

(Sl No. 1,3&4)<br />

Service Charges @ 20.5% 40.31<br />

Total( Non-Residential) 7166 522.87<br />

Grand Total 11520 916.01<br />

Add for WORKS TAX @ 2% 18.32<br />

Grand Total 934.33


Sl<br />

No<br />

O-MISCELLANEOUS<br />

Description Quantity<br />

1.0 CAPITAL COST<br />

1.1 Purchase <strong>of</strong> Diesel Generator Sets (25<br />

KVA) including anciliary equipments<br />

etc.<br />

1.2 Cost <strong>of</strong> transmission line for<br />

construction power<br />

1.3 Water Supply, purification &<br />

distribution arrangements including<br />

purchase <strong>of</strong> water tankers,filters, cost <strong>of</strong><br />

tanks & chlorination.<br />

1.4 Providing sewage disposal and storm<br />

water drains in <strong>of</strong>fice and residential<br />

complexes.<br />

159<br />

Rate<br />

(Rs.)<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Rs. In lakhs<br />

Unit Amount<br />

(Rs.)<br />

4.00 2.50 Nos 10.00<br />

10.00 10.00 km 100.00<br />

LS 25.00<br />

LS 25.00<br />

1.5 Providing & fixing <strong>of</strong> fire fighting equipments. LS 15.00<br />

1.6 Providing telephone, Telegraph <strong>of</strong>fice,<br />

Post <strong>of</strong>fice and Wireless equipments.<br />

LS 20.00<br />

1.7 Providing hospital equipments. LS 15.00<br />

1.8 Construction <strong>of</strong> children park and<br />

welfare centres for <strong>of</strong>ficials and<br />

labourers.<br />

LS 8.00<br />

1.9 Furnishing and equipping <strong>of</strong> rest houses<br />

and field hostels <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers and staff.<br />

1.10 Purchase <strong>of</strong> furniture and other articles<br />

for labour welfare centres and clubs<br />

and schools.<br />

1.11 Purchase <strong>of</strong> equipment for quality<br />

control/field Laboratories<br />

LS 5.00<br />

LS 5.00<br />

LS 15.00<br />

Sub Total Item 1 243.00<br />

2.0 MAINTENANCE & SERVICE<br />

CHARGES<br />

2.1 R&M <strong>of</strong> Diesel Generator sets 4 Nos.<br />

for four years.<br />

16.00 4.00 Nos 64.00<br />

R&M <strong>of</strong> Transmission line for four 10.00 4.00 km 40.00


years.<br />

2.2 R&M <strong>of</strong> water supply facilities to the<br />

staff and labour colonies for four years<br />

2.3 R&M <strong>of</strong> sanitation and drainage<br />

facilities for <strong>of</strong>fice and residential<br />

compllex and labour colonies.<br />

160<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

LS 10.00<br />

LS 8.00<br />

2.4 R&M <strong>of</strong> fire fighting equipments. LS 4.00<br />

2.5 Maint. Of telecommunication system<br />

and post <strong>of</strong>fices.<br />

LS 20.00<br />

2,6 R&M <strong>of</strong> hospitals. LS 16.00<br />

2.7 Maint. <strong>of</strong> parks and welfare centres,<br />

clubs and school.<br />

LS 10.00<br />

2.8 R&M <strong>of</strong> Rest houses and field hostels. LS 8.00<br />

2.9 R&M <strong>of</strong> research & quality control<br />

laboratories<br />

LS 8.00<br />

2.10 Labour welfare compensation and<br />

retrenchment benefits.<br />

LS 30.00<br />

2.11 Providing Security & Policing LS 10.00<br />

2.12 R&M <strong>of</strong> Inspection vehicles and staff<br />

cars (15 nos) for four year<br />

15*4 2.50 year 150.00<br />

2.13 R&M <strong>of</strong> school buses, Ambulance Car<br />

etc. (4 nos) for for four year<br />

4*4 1.80 year 28.80<br />

Sub Total Item 2 406.80<br />

3.0 MISCELLANEOUS<br />

3.1 Foundation stone laying ceremony,<br />

inaguration and visit <strong>of</strong> Dignitaries.<br />

LS 10.00<br />

3.2 Railway siding LS 20.00<br />

3.3 Installation and maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

Petrol/Diesel Pumps<br />

LS 16.00<br />

3.4 Providing anti malarial measures LS 2.00<br />

3.5 Procurement <strong>of</strong> technical leterature. LS 2.00<br />

3.6 Model Exhibits LS 4.00<br />

3.7 Canteen facilities and co-operative<br />

stores.<br />

LS 20.00<br />

3.8 Photographic and Cinemagraphic<br />

equipment and their maintenance<br />

LS 8.00<br />

3.9 Group insurance LS 15.00<br />

3.10 Publication and pamplets LS 2.00


161<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

3.11 Creches LS 2.00<br />

3.12 Compensation for accident LS 8.00<br />

3.13 Training <strong>of</strong> personnels aboard includig<br />

study course and visit<br />

LS 15.00<br />

3.14 Award to workers LS 1.50<br />

Sub Total Item 3 125.50<br />

Grand Total 775.30


Sl.No. Description <strong>of</strong> equipment<br />

1 Loader cum Excavator,<br />

1.0/0.25 cum.<br />

Q-Spl T&P for Infrastructure Development<br />

162<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Unit Quantity<br />

Rs in Lacs<br />

Rate<br />

Amount<br />

Nos 1 18.00 18.00<br />

2 Mini excavator 0.3 cum Nos 1 25.00 25.00<br />

3 Multi utility (Skid Steer loader) Nos 1 40.00 40.00<br />

4 Front End loader 2 cum Nos 1 24.00 24.00<br />

5 Crawler Dozer, 100 FHP Nos 1 50.00 50.00<br />

6 Wheel Dozer, 130 FHP Nos 1 58.00 58.00<br />

7 Diamond Core Drill<br />

(Mechanical)<br />

Nos 1 15.00 15.00<br />

8 Diamond Core Drill (Hyd) Nos 1 60.00 60.00<br />

9 Air Track/Wagon Drill Nos 1 15.00 15.00<br />

10 Jack Hammer/Pavement<br />

Breaker<br />

Nos 5 0.35 1.75<br />

11 Compressed Air(cfm) Nos 1200 0.0125 15.00<br />

12 Mobile Crane, 10 t Pick &<br />

Carry<br />

Nos 1 10.00 10.00<br />

13 Mobile Crane, 20 t (rough Nos 1 70.00 70.00<br />

Terrain)<br />

14 Road Roller, 8/10 t Nos 1 10.00 10.00<br />

15 Dewatering Pump L.S L.S 5.00 5.00<br />

16 Snow cutter Nos 1 50.00 50.00<br />

17 Tipper 4.5/6.0 cum. Nos 4 9.50 38.00<br />

18 Truck, 8/10 t Nos 2 7.50 15.00<br />

19 Low Bed Tractor Trailor, 20 t Nos 1 30.00 30.00<br />

20 Concrete Mixer, 14/10 cft Nos 2 1.50 3.00<br />

21 Explosive Van, 5/7 t Nos 1 10.00 10.00<br />

22 Water Tanker/Sprinkler, 10 KL Nos 1 12.00 12.00<br />

23 Petrol/Diesel Tanker, 10 KL Nos 1 12.00 12.00<br />

24 Bus/Mini Bus Nos 4 8.00 32.00<br />

25 Car/MUV Nos 2 4.00 8.00<br />

26 Jeep (Petrol/Diesel) Nos 15 4.00 60.00<br />

27 Ambulance Nos 2 8.00 16.00


163<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

28 Workshop Equipt. L.S L.S 15.00 15.00<br />

29 Fire Tender Nos 1 15.00 15.00<br />

30 Recovery Van Nos 1 5.00 5.00<br />

31 Pick up Van/L.C.V Nos 1 5.00 5.00<br />

Total 742.75<br />

DISTRIBUTION OF COST UNDER HEAD Q - SPECIAL T & P AND V -<br />

RECEIPT & RECOVERIES<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> equipments excluding inspection<br />

vehicles<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> inspection vehicles (Item 24 to 27<br />

& 29)<br />

Cost Q R&R<br />

(Rs. In<br />

lakhs)<br />

611.75 152.94 114.70<br />

131.00 131.00 26.20<br />

Provision under head Q - Spl. T&P 742.75 283.94<br />

Recoveries to be shown under V- Receipt<br />

and Recoveries<br />

140.90


SI<br />

NO.<br />

164<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

R - COMMUNUCATION<br />

Rs. In lakhs<br />

Description Unit Quantity Rate Amount<br />

1 Proposed new roads<br />

Approach road to dam site, DT, Top <strong>of</strong> Dam Km 23.0 80.00 1840.00<br />

Approach road to power house site Km 2.0 80.00 160.00<br />

Switch yard Km 1.0 80.00 80.00<br />

Surgeshaft,Adit I,II,III Km 9.0 80.00 720.00<br />

Colony Roads Km 2.0 75.00 150.00<br />

2 Proposed new bailey bridges Cl 30<br />

At dam site M 30.0 2.25 67.50<br />

3 Proposed Culverts<br />

Culverts ( 4nos) M 40.0 1.00 40.00<br />

Total 3057.50<br />

Add for WORKS TAX 2% 61.15<br />

Grand Total 3118.65


S.<br />

No.<br />

V - RECEIPT & RECOVERIES<br />

Item Amount<br />

165<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

(Rs. In Lakhs)<br />

1. Recovery from the Sale <strong>of</strong> Equipments 140.90<br />

2 Recovery from the DG sets 2.00<br />

3 Recovery from Temporary Buildings 62.86<br />

Total 205.76


COST ESTIMATE OF E&M WORKS<br />

Generator, Turbine and Accessories<br />

166<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Annex-I (page 1 <strong>of</strong> 2)<br />

S.No. Item Particulars Qty Unit Rate Amount Excise Duty*<br />

Total<br />

(Rs Rate Amount (Rs<br />

Lakhs)<br />

Lakh)<br />

1 2 3 3(a) 4 5 6 7 5+7<br />

1 (a) Generating units and<br />

Bus Ducts 2x35 MW,<br />

1000 rpm, Head 1106.37<br />

meters<br />

2 Step up transformer<br />

11/220 KV, 15MVA,<br />

3<br />

single phase<br />

Auxiliary Electrical<br />

Equipment for <strong>Power</strong><br />

Stations (Except<br />

Transformer) (5% <strong>of</strong> item<br />

1)<br />

3 no. 3400<br />

Rs/KW<br />

7 no. 250<br />

Rs/KVA<br />

3570.00 16 571.20 4141.20<br />

262.5 16 42 304.5<br />

178.5 16 28.56 207.06<br />

4 Auxiliary Equipment &<br />

178.5 16 28.56 207.06<br />

Services for <strong>Power</strong><br />

stations (5% <strong>of</strong> Item 1)<br />

XLPE Cable (220 kV) 2750 m 0 Rs/m 0.00 16 0.00 0.00<br />

5<br />

XLPE Cable termination<br />

Kit<br />

Switchyard (220KV) 5<br />

6 Spares (5% <strong>of</strong> item 1 and<br />

3% <strong>of</strong> item 2 to 5 )<br />

20 no. 0 each 0.00 16 0.00 0.00<br />

132 660.00 16 105.60 765.60<br />

bays lacs/bay<br />

178.5 38.39 216.89 16 34.70 251.59<br />

7 Subtotal(1-6) 5877.01<br />

8 Central Sales tax** 4% <strong>of</strong><br />

item 7<br />

202.66 235.08<br />

9 Transportation<br />

Insurance 6% <strong>of</strong> item 7<br />

&<br />

10 Erection & commissioning<br />

8% <strong>of</strong> item 7 except spares<br />

352.62<br />

450.03<br />

11 Subtotal (7-10)<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> FC (XLPE Cable<br />

6914.74<br />

12<br />

and Termination kit) in<br />

INR (As per Annexure-II)<br />

710.90


13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

Custom Duty @22% <strong>of</strong><br />

item 12<br />

Marine frieght and<br />

insurance @6% Approx <strong>of</strong><br />

12<br />

included in above item 12<br />

167<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

42.65<br />

Inland Frieght and<br />

insurance 6% <strong>of</strong> item 12 42.65<br />

Erection & commissioning<br />

8% <strong>of</strong> item 12 excluding<br />

spares<br />

Subtotal <strong>of</strong> FC ( item 12-<br />

16 in INR)<br />

Subtotal <strong>of</strong> item no<br />

11+17(Foreign plus indian<br />

component)<br />

19 Establishment,<br />

Contingency, other<br />

charges 11% <strong>of</strong> Item 18<br />

Excluding duties<br />

GRAND TOTAL (In<br />

Lakhs)<br />

*Custom duty in case <strong>of</strong> imported Items<br />

**Not applicable for Imported Items<br />

55.85<br />

852.06<br />

7766.80<br />

621.42<br />

8388.22<br />

*** The cost <strong>of</strong> 220kV switchyard has been taken as Rs.150 lacs per bay taking into consideration high<br />

altitude <strong>of</strong> the project


COST ESTIMATE OF E&M WORKS<br />

<strong>Power</strong> Evacuation system<br />

S.No. Item Particulars Qty Rate Amount Excise Duty*<br />

168<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

Annex-III (page 1 <strong>of</strong> 1)<br />

Total<br />

(Rs (Rs % Amount (Rs<br />

Lakhs) Lakhs)<br />

Lakh)<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5+7<br />

1 1 no 220kV Double<br />

Circuit line (<strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 36 kms)<br />

36 km 35<br />

lacs/km<br />

1260.00 16 201.60 1461.60<br />

2 Spares ( 3% <strong>of</strong> 1) 37.8 16 6.048 43.85<br />

3 Subtotal(1) 1505.45<br />

4 Central Sales tax 4% <strong>of</strong><br />

item 3<br />

51.91 60.22<br />

5 Transportation &<br />

Insurance 6% <strong>of</strong> item 3<br />

7 Erection & commissioning<br />

8% <strong>of</strong> item 3 except spares<br />

90.33<br />

116.93<br />

8 Subtotal(2) 1772.92<br />

9 Establishment,<br />

Contingency, other<br />

charges 11% <strong>of</strong> Item 3<br />

excluding duties<br />

142.76<br />

GRAND TOTAL (In<br />

Lakhs)<br />

1915.68


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

CHAPTER – XIII<br />

ECONOMIC EVALUATION


13.1 GENERAL<br />

CHAPTER – XIII<br />

ECONOMIC EVALUATION<br />

169<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The Project has been contemplated as a run-<strong>of</strong>f the river scheme on river <strong>Ringpi</strong>. The<br />

project is estimated to cost Rs. 466.04 crores excluding IDC at June 2003 Price Level.<br />

Sale price <strong>of</strong> energy generated at powerhouse bus bars has been worked out as 3.61 Rs.<br />

per unit with free power to home state (Table 13.2) & Rs. 3.17 per unit without free<br />

power to home state (Table 13.2-A).<br />

13.2 ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION:<br />

The energy generation <strong>of</strong> the project with an installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 2 X 35 MW has been<br />

estimated at 317.41 MU in a 90% dependable year.<br />

13.3 COST ESTIMATES AND PHASING OF EXPENDITURES<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the project has been estimated at June 2003 price level with a<br />

construction schedule <strong>of</strong> 5.5 years including 1.5 years for Infrastructure works.<br />

The estimated Present Day Cost <strong>of</strong> the project is Rs. 466.04 Crores without IDC at June<br />

2003 Price level.<br />

13.4 PHASING OF EXPENDITURE<br />

The phasing <strong>of</strong> expenditure has been worked out on the basis <strong>of</strong> anticipated construction<br />

programme.


170<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

The phasing <strong>of</strong> expenditure without IDC for present day cost is shown as below:<br />

Year Estimated Cost at June 2003 P.L.<br />

(Rs. in Crores)<br />

1 st 46.60<br />

2 nd 65.25<br />

3 rd<br />

93.21<br />

4 th 130.49<br />

5 th 93.21<br />

5.5 th 37.28<br />

Net Cost 466.04<br />

13.5 INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION (IDC)<br />

Based upon above phasing <strong>of</strong> expenditure the interest during construction (IDC) have<br />

been calculated with 70:30 debt equity ratio and 10.0% interest on loan for estimated<br />

Present Day cost <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

The estimated IDC with estimated present cost is Rs. 53.23 Crores<br />

13.6 COST OF ENERGY GENERATION<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> energy generation has been calculated for the annual energy generation in a<br />

90% dependable year based upon following assumptions.<br />

1. Debt-equity ratio 70 : 30<br />

2. Annual interest rate on loan 10.0%<br />

3. Return on equity 16%<br />

4. Annual interest rate on working capital 10.0%<br />

5. O&M Charges 1.5% <strong>of</strong> Project Cost<br />

6. Free power to Home State 12% <strong>of</strong> the energy<br />

available after losses


171<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

7. Depreciation considered 1/12 th <strong>of</strong> loan amount<br />

during loan repayment<br />

period.<br />

The levellised tariff <strong>of</strong> the Project at present day cost works out to be Rs. 2.93 Per Unit<br />

with free power to home state (Table 13.3) & Rs 2.58 per unit without free power to<br />

home state. (Table 13.3-A).


172<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35MW)<br />

STATEMENT SHOWING IDC CALCULATION AT PRESENT DAY COST (JUNE 2003 LEVEL)<br />

PRESENT DAY COST 466.04 Crs.<br />

Civil Works 363.00 Crs. Electrical Works 83.88 Crs.<br />

INTEREST RATE PER ANNUM 10% Transmission cost 19.16 Crs.<br />

(Rs. in Crs.)<br />

Present Day Amount Receivable I.D.C Loan Outstanding Amount Receivable<br />

Year Cost Equity Loan at the end <strong>of</strong> Equity Loan<br />

year (for the year)<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

1 46.60 46.60 46.60<br />

2 65.25 65.25 65.25<br />

3 93.21 43.93 49.28 1.30 50.58 43.93 50.58<br />

4 130.49 130.49 11.58 192.65 142.07<br />

5 93.21 93.21 23.93 309.79 117.13<br />

5.5 37.28 37.28 16.42 363.49 53.70<br />

Total 466.04 155.78 310.26 53.23 155.78 363.49<br />

IDC 53.23 Crs. Equity 155.78 Crs.<br />

Net cost <strong>of</strong> the project 519.27 Crs. Loan 363.49 Crs.<br />

Table-13.1


173<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

TABLE-13.2<br />

UNIT COST OF ENERGY AT BUS BAR AT CURRENT PRICE LEVEL<br />

(June 2003 P.L.)<br />

(Based on 16% return on equity & 10% interest on loan, 10% interest on working capital)<br />

1 Installed capacity 70 MW<br />

2 Cost <strong>of</strong> the Project (Net) Rs. 466.04 Crores<br />

3 Interest During Construction Rs. 53.23 Crores<br />

4 Total Cost <strong>of</strong> Project Rs. 519.27 Crores<br />

(Including IDC)<br />

a) Equity 30% Rs. 155.78 Crores<br />

b) Loan 70% Rs. 363.49 Crores<br />

5 Annual Energy Generation 317.41 MU<br />

6 0.7% As Auxiliary Consumption <strong>of</strong> No. 5 0.70% 2.22 MU<br />

7 Energy Available After Auxiliary Consumption 315.19 MU<br />

8 0.5% As Transformer Loss <strong>of</strong> No. 7 0.50% 1.58 MU<br />

9 Energy Available After Transformer Loss 313.61 MU<br />

10 Free <strong>Power</strong> to Home State 12% 37.63 MU<br />

11<br />

Energy Available After Allowing Free<br />

<strong>Power</strong> 275.98 MU<br />

12 Fixed and Running Charges<br />

A) Capacity Charges<br />

a) Interest on Loan 10.00% 34.83 Crores<br />

b) Depreciation Charges<br />

(Limited to 1/12 th <strong>of</strong> Loan Amount)<br />

30.29 Crores<br />

B) Energy Charges<br />

SUB-TOTAL 65.12 Crores<br />

a) O&M Charges 1.50% 7.79 Crores<br />

b) Return on Equity 16.00% 24.93 Crores<br />

SUB-TOTAL 32.71 Crores<br />

c) Interest on Working Capital 10.00% 1.72 Crores<br />

I) O&M Charges for 1 month 0.65<br />

II) 2 Months Average Billing 16.59<br />

TOTAL Rs. 99.56 Crores<br />

13 Sale Price at Bus Bar/Unit 3.61 Rs.<br />

14 Cost <strong>of</strong> Generation at Bus Bar/Unit 2.38 Rs.<br />

(Without Allowing Free <strong>Power</strong> to Home State and Return on Equity)<br />

Note : This unit rate is excluding water cess, income tax incentive, penalties etc.


174<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

TABLE-13.2 A<br />

UNIT COST OF ENERGY AT BUS BAR AT CURRENT PRICE LEVEL<br />

(June 2003 P.L.) WITHOUT FREE POWER TO HOME STATE<br />

(Based on 16% return on equity & 10% interest on loan, 10% interest on working capital)<br />

1 Installed capacity 70 MW<br />

2 Cost <strong>of</strong> the Project (Net) Rs. 466.04 Crores<br />

3 Interest During Construction Rs. 53.23 Crores<br />

4 Total Cost <strong>of</strong> Project Rs. 519.27 Crores<br />

(Including IDC)<br />

a) Equity 30% Rs. 155.78 Crores<br />

b) Loan 70% Rs. 363.49 Crores<br />

5 Annual Energy Generation 317.41 MU<br />

6 0.7% As Auxiliary Consumption <strong>of</strong> No. 5 0.70% 2.22 MU<br />

7 Energy Available After Auxiliary Consumption 315.19 MU<br />

8 0.5% As Transformer Loss <strong>of</strong> No. 7 0.50% 1.58 MU<br />

9 Energy Available After Transformer Loss 313.61 MU<br />

10 Free <strong>Power</strong> to Home State 0% 0.00 MU<br />

11<br />

Energy Available After Allowing Free<br />

<strong>Power</strong> 313.61 MU<br />

12 Fixed and Running Charges<br />

A) Capacity Charges<br />

a) Interest on Loan 10.00% 34.83 Crores<br />

b) Depreciation Charges<br />

(Limited to 1/12 th <strong>of</strong> Loan Amount)<br />

30.29 Crores<br />

B) Energy Charges<br />

SUB-TOTAL 65.12 Crores<br />

a) O&M Charges 1.50% 7.79 Crores<br />

b) Return on Equity 16.00% 24.93 Crores<br />

SUB-TOTAL 32.71 Crores<br />

c) Interest on Working Capital 10.00% 1.72 Crores<br />

I) O&M Charges for 1 month 0.65<br />

II) 2 Months Average Billing 16.59<br />

TOTAL Rs. 99.56 Crores<br />

13 Sale Price at Bus Bar/Unit 3.17 Rs.<br />

14 Cost <strong>of</strong> Generation at Bus Bar/Unit 2.38 Rs.<br />

(Without Allowing Free <strong>Power</strong> to Home State and Return on Equity)<br />

Note : This unit rate is excluding water cess, income tax incentive, penalties etc.


CALCULATION OF ENERGY RATE WITH PRESENT COST (JUNE 2003 PRICE LEVEL) AS PER TARIFF NOTIFICATION<br />

175<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

TABLE-13.3<br />

Annual Generation in a 90% dependable year<br />

Annual Generation after allowing losses & free<br />

power to home state in a 90% dependable year<br />

Total cost including IDC<br />

Equity 30%<br />

Loan 70%<br />

Rs.<br />

Rs.<br />

Rs.<br />

317.41<br />

275.98<br />

519.27<br />

155.78<br />

363.49<br />

MU<br />

MU<br />

Crores<br />

Crores<br />

Crores<br />

O&M Charges<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> O&M Charges after 1st Year (Compounded)<br />

Interest rate on Loan<br />

Interest rate on Working Capital<br />

Return on Equity<br />

Discounting rate<br />

1.50%<br />

6%<br />

10.0%<br />

10.00%<br />

16%<br />

12%<br />

Year<br />

Out-<br />

Capacity Charges<br />

(Rs.in Cr.) (Rs.in Cr.)<br />

O&M Interest on<br />

Charges Per Unit<br />

(Rs. per Unit)<br />

Discounting<br />

Factor<br />

Discounted<br />

Tariff<br />

standing Interest Depre- Total Return O&M for1 Working Capital Total Capacity Energy Total (Paisa per<br />

Loan(Rs.in<br />

on<br />

2 months<br />

Cr.) on loan ciation<br />

equity Charges month Average Billing Interest charges charges Unit)<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16<br />

1 363.49 34.83 30.29 65.13 24.93 7.79 0.65 16.59 1.72 34.44 2.36 1.25 3.61 1.0000 3.61<br />

2 333.20 31.81 30.29 62.10 24.93 8.26 0.69 16.16 1.68 34.87 2.25 1.26 3.51 0.8929 3.14<br />

3 302.91 28.78 30.29 59.07 24.93 8.75 0.73 15.73 1.65 35.32 2.14 1.28 3.42 0.7972 2.73<br />

4 272.62 25.75 30.29 56.04 24.93 9.28 0.77 15.31 1.61 35.81 2.03 1.30 3.33 0.7118 2.37<br />

5 242.33 22.72 30.29 53.01 24.93 9.83 0.82 14.89 1.57 36.33 1.92 1.32 3.24 0.6355 2.06<br />

6 212.04 19.69 30.29 49.98 24.93 10.42 0.87 14.48 1.53 36.88 1.81 1.34 3.15 0.5674 1.79<br />

7 181.74 16.66 30.29 46.95 24.93 11.05 0.92 14.07 1.50 37.47 1.70 1.36 3.06 0.5066 1.55<br />

8 151.45 13.63 30.29 43.92 24.93 11.71 0.98 13.67 1.46 38.10 1.59 1.38 2.97 0.4523 1.34<br />

9 121.16 10.60 30.29 40.89 24.93 12.41 1.03 13.28 1.43 38.77 1.48 1.40 2.89 0.4039 1.17<br />

10 90.87 7.57 30.29 37.86 24.93 13.16 1.10 12.89 1.40 39.48 1.37 1.43 2.80 0.3606 1.01<br />

11 60.58 4.54 30.29 34.83 24.93 13.95 1.16 12.51 1.37 40.24 1.26 1.46 2.72 0.3220 0.88<br />

12 30.29 1.51 30.29 31.81 24.93 14.79 1.23 12.14 1.34 41.05 1.15 1.49 2.64 0.2875 0.76<br />

13 0.00 0.00 4.52 4.52 24.93 15.67 1.31 7.67 0.90 41.50 0.16 1.50 1.67 0.2567 0.43<br />

14 0.00 4.52 4.52 24.93 16.61 1.38 7.83 0.92 42.46 0.16 1.54 1.70 0.2292 0.39<br />

15 4.52 4.52 24.93 17.61 1.47 8.00 0.95 43.48 0.16 1.58 1.74 0.2046 0.36<br />

16 4.52 4.52 24.93 18.67 1.56 8.18 0.97 44.57 0.16 1.61 1.78 0.1827 0.32<br />

17 4.52 4.52 24.93 19.79 1.65 8.37 1.00 45.71 0.16 1.66 1.82 0.1631 0.30<br />

18 4.52 4.52 24.93 20.97 1.75 8.57 1.03 46.93 0.16 1.70 1.86 0.1456 0.27<br />

19 4.52 4.52 24.93 22.23 1.85 8.79 1.06 48.22 0.16 1.75 1.91 0.1300 0.25<br />

20 4.52 4.52 24.93 23.57 1.96 9.02 1.10 49.59 0.16 1.80 1.96 0.1161 0.23<br />

21 4.52 4.52 24.93 24.98 2.08 9.26 1.13 51.04 0.16 1.85 2.01 0.1037 0.21<br />

22 4.52 4.52 24.93 26.48 2.21 9.52 1.17 52.58 0.16 1.91 2.07 0.0926 0.19<br />

23 4.52 4.52 24.93 28.07 2.34 9.79 1.21 54.21 0.16 1.96 2.13 0.0826 0.18<br />

24 4.52 4.52 24.93 29.75 2.48 10.07 1.26 55.93 0.16 2.03 2.19 0.0738 0.16<br />

25 4.52 4.52 24.93 31.54 2.63 10.38 1.30 57.76 0.16 2.09 2.26 0.0659 0.15<br />

26 4.52 4.52 24.93 33.43 2.79 10.70 1.35 59.70 0.16 2.16 2.33 0.0588 0.14<br />

27 4.52 4.52 24.93 35.44 2.95 11.05 1.40 61.76 0.16 2.24 2.40 0.0525 0.13<br />

28 4.52 4.52 24.93 37.56 3.13 11.41 1.45 63.94 0.16 2.32 2.48 0.0469 0.12<br />

29 4.52 4.52 24.93 39.82 3.32 11.79 1.51 66.25 0.16 2.40 2.56 0.0419 0.11<br />

30 4.52 4.52 24.93 42.20 3.52 12.20 1.57 68.70 0.16 2.49 2.65 0.0374 0.10<br />

31 4.52 4.52 24.93 44.74 3.73 12.64 1.64 71.30 0.16 2.58 2.75 0.0334 0.09<br />

32 4.52 4.52 24.93 47.42 3.95 13.09 1.70 74.05 0.16 2.68 2.85 0.0298 0.08<br />

33 4.52 4.52 24.93 50.27 4.19 13.58 1.78 76.97 0.16 2.79 2.95 0.0266 0.08<br />

34 4.52 4.52 24.93 53.28 4.44 14.10 1.85 80.06 0.16 2.90 3.06 0.0238 0.07<br />

35 4.52 4.52 24.93 56.48 4.71 14.64 1.93 83.34 0.16 3.02 3.18 0.0212 0.07<br />

TOTAL 9.1566 26.80<br />

(A) (B)<br />

Note: The charges per unit is exclusive <strong>of</strong> water cess, spares, incentive & Income Tax etc. Levellised Tariff =(B)/(A) 2.93


176<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35 MW)<br />

TABLE-13.3 A<br />

CALCULATION OF ENERGY RATE WITH PRESENT COST (JUNE 2003 PRICE LEVEL) AS PER TARIFF NOTIFICATION (Without free power to home state)<br />

Annual Generation in a 90% dependable year<br />

Annual Generation after allowing losses<br />

in a 90% dependable year<br />

Total cost including IDC<br />

Equity 30%<br />

Loan 70%<br />

Rs.<br />

Rs.<br />

Rs.<br />

317.41<br />

313.61<br />

519.27<br />

155.78<br />

363.49<br />

MU<br />

MU<br />

Crores<br />

Crores<br />

Crores<br />

O&M Charges<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> O&M Charges after 1st Year (Compounded)<br />

Interest rate on Loan<br />

Interest rate on Working Capital<br />

Return on Equity<br />

Discounting rate<br />

1.50%<br />

6%<br />

10.0%<br />

10.00%<br />

16%<br />

12%<br />

YEAR<br />

Out-<br />

Standing<br />

CAPACITY CHARGES<br />

(Rs.in Cr.) (Rs.in Cr.)<br />

O&M Interest on<br />

CHARGES PER UNIT<br />

(Rs. per Unit)<br />

Discounting<br />

Factor<br />

Discounted<br />

Tariff<br />

Loan Interest Depre- Total Return O&M for1 Working Capital Total Capacity Energy Total (Paisa per<br />

1<br />

(Rs.in Cr.)<br />

2<br />

on loan<br />

3<br />

ciation<br />

4 5<br />

on equity<br />

6<br />

Charges<br />

7<br />

month<br />

8<br />

2 months<br />

Average Billing<br />

9<br />

Interest<br />

10 11<br />

charges<br />

12<br />

charges<br />

13 14 15<br />

Unit)<br />

16<br />

1 363.49 34.83 30.29 65.13 24.93 7.79 0.65 16.59 1.72 34.44 2.08 1.10 3.17 1.0000 3.17<br />

2 333.20 31.81 30.29 62.10 24.93 8.26 0.69 16.16 1.68 34.87 1.98 1.11 3.09 0.8929 2.76<br />

3 302.91 28.78 30.29 59.07 24.93 8.75 0.73 15.73 1.65 35.32 1.88 1.13 3.01 0.7972 2.40<br />

4 272.62 25.75 30.29 56.04 24.93 9.28 0.77 15.31 1.61 35.81 1.79 1.14 2.93 0.7118 2.08<br />

5 242.33 22.72 30.29 53.01 24.93 9.83 0.82 14.89 1.57 36.33 1.69 1.16 2.85 0.6355 1.81<br />

6 212.04 19.69 30.29 49.98 24.93 10.42 0.87 14.48 1.53 36.88 1.59 1.18 2.77 0.5674 1.57<br />

7 181.74 16.66 30.29 46.95 24.93 11.05 0.92 14.07 1.50 37.47 1.50 1.19 2.69 0.5066 1.36<br />

8 151.45 13.63 30.29 43.92 24.93 11.71 0.98 13.67 1.46 38.10 1.40 1.21 2.62 0.4523 1.18<br />

9 121.16 10.60 30.29 40.89 24.93 12.41 1.03 13.28 1.43 38.77 1.30 1.24 2.54 0.4039 1.03<br />

10 90.87 7.57 30.29 37.86 24.93 13.16 1.10 12.89 1.40 39.48 1.21 1.26 2.47 0.3606 0.89<br />

11 60.58 4.54 30.29 34.83 24.93 13.95 1.16 12.51 1.37 40.24 1.11 1.28 2.39 0.3220 0.77<br />

12 30.29 1.51 30.29 31.81 24.93 14.79 1.23 12.14 1.34 41.05 1.01 1.31 2.32 0.2875 0.67<br />

13 0.00 0.00 4.52 4.52 24.93 15.67 1.31 7.67 0.90 41.50 0.14 1.32 1.47 0.2567 0.38<br />

14 0.00 4.52 4.52 24.93 16.61 1.38 7.83 0.92 42.46 0.14 1.35 1.50 0.2292 0.34<br />

15 4.52 4.52 24.93 17.61 1.47 8.00 0.95 43.48 0.14 1.39 1.53 0.2046 0.31<br />

16 4.52 4.52 24.93 18.67 1.56 8.18 0.97 44.57 0.14 1.42 1.57 0.1827 0.29<br />

17 4.52 4.52 24.93 19.79 1.65 8.37 1.00 45.71 0.14 1.46 1.60 0.1631 0.26<br />

18 4.52 4.52 24.93 20.97 1.75 8.57 1.03 46.93 0.14 1.50 1.64 0.1456 0.24<br />

19 4.52 4.52 24.93 22.23 1.85 8.79 1.06 48.22 0.14 1.54 1.68 0.1300 0.22<br />

20 4.52 4.52 24.93 23.57 1.96 9.02 1.10 49.59 0.14 1.58 1.73 0.1161 0.20<br />

21 4.52 4.52 24.93 24.98 2.08 9.26 1.13 51.04 0.14 1.63 1.77 0.1037 0.18<br />

22 4.52 4.52 24.93 26.48 2.21 9.52 1.17 52.58 0.14 1.68 1.82 0.0926 0.17<br />

23 4.52 4.52 24.93 28.07 2.34 9.79 1.21 54.21 0.14 1.73 1.87 0.0826 0.15<br />

24 4.52 4.52 24.93 29.75 2.48 10.07 1.26 55.93 0.14 1.78 1.93 0.0738 0.14<br />

25 4.52 4.52 24.93 31.54 2.63 10.38 1.30 57.76 0.14 1.84 1.99 0.0659 0.13<br />

26 4.52 4.52 24.93 33.43 2.79 10.70 1.35 59.70 0.14 1.90 2.05 0.0588 0.12<br />

27 4.52 4.52 24.93 35.44 2.95 11.05 1.40 61.76 0.14 1.97 2.11 0.0525 0.11<br />

28 4.52 4.52 24.93 37.56 3.13 11.41 1.45 63.94 0.14 2.04 2.18 0.0469 0.10<br />

29 4.52 4.52 24.93 39.82 3.32 11.79 1.51 66.25 0.14 2.11 2.26 0.0419 0.09<br />

30 4.52 4.52 24.93 42.20 3.52 12.20 1.57 68.70 0.14 2.19 2.33 0.0374 0.09<br />

31 4.52 4.52 24.93 44.74 3.73 12.64 1.64 71.30 0.14 2.27 2.42 0.0334 0.08<br />

32 4.52 4.52 24.93 47.42 3.95 13.09 1.70 74.05 0.14 2.36 2.51 0.0298 0.07<br />

33 4.52 4.52 24.93 50.27 4.19 13.58 1.78 76.97 0.14 2.45 2.60 0.0266 0.07<br />

34 4.52 4.52 24.93 53.28 4.44 14.10 1.85 80.06 0.14 2.55 2.70 0.0238 0.06<br />

35 4.52 4.52 24.93 56.48 4.71 14.64 1.93 83.34 0.14 2.66 2.80 0.0212 0.06<br />

TOTAL 9.1566 23.58<br />

(A) (B)<br />

Note: The charges per unit is exclusive <strong>of</strong> water cess, spares, incentive & Income Tax etc. Levellised Tariff =(B)/(A) 2.58


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

PLATES


DIVERSION<br />

BED LEVEL : 1055 m.<br />

PANAN<br />

POWER HOUSE<br />

T.R.L. : 1060 m.<br />

AV.GROSS HEAD : 740 M<br />

FIRM POWER : 19.7 MW<br />

INST. CAPACITY : 160 MW<br />

PANAN H.E. SCHEME<br />

LAVEN<br />

POWER HOUSE<br />

LINGZA<br />

T.R.L. : 780 m.<br />

AV.GROSS HEAD : 310 M<br />

FIRM POWER : 28.4 MW<br />

INST. CAPACITY : 230 MW<br />

LINGZA H.E. SCHEME<br />

DIVERSION<br />

BED LEVEL : 1800 m.<br />

POWER HOUSE<br />

T.R.L. : 1800 m.<br />

AV.GROSS HEAD : 1150 M<br />

FIRM POWER : 19.7 MW<br />

INST. CAPACITY : 160 MW<br />

RINGPI H.E. SCHEME<br />

DIVERSION<br />

BED LEVEL : 2950 m.<br />

N<br />

SCALE- 1:50000<br />

PLATE - 1<br />

MAY, 1983<br />

PANAN, LINGZA & RINGPI<br />

H.E. SCHEMES<br />

ON TOLUNG RIVER<br />

(TISTA RIVER SYSTEM)<br />

DRG.NO. HEPR-PS-BHM-784


ELEVATION IN METERS<br />

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM SHOWING CASCADE DEVELOPMENT OF TEESTA RIVER BASIN (SIKKIM)<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

000<br />

TEESTA PROJECT<br />

STAGE -VI<br />

SALENTFEATURES:-<br />

1. CATCHMENT AREA 4874sqkm<br />

2. DISCHARGE(Dependable) 93CUMECS<br />

3. F.R.L. 341m.<br />

4. TYPE OF DAM(Conc.GravityDam)<br />

5. T.W.L. 253.5om.<br />

6. AVERAGE GROSS HEAD 84.50m.<br />

7. LENGTH OF TUNNEL 3.50km.<br />

8. FIRM POWER 55.50MW.<br />

9. PROPOSED INSTALLED<br />

CAPACITY 360MW.<br />

11O<br />

UNDER CONST.BY NHPC<br />

TEESTA PROJECT<br />

STAGE -V<br />

SALENTFEATURES:-<br />

1. CATCHMENT AREA 4336sqkm<br />

2. DISCHARGE(Dependable) 60cumecs<br />

3. F.R.L. 579m.<br />

4. TYPE OF DAM-Conc.GravityDam<br />

5. T.W.L. 359.5m.<br />

6. AVERAGE GROSS HEAD 216.73m.<br />

7. LENGTH OF TUNNEL 18km.<br />

8. FIRM POWER 100mw.<br />

9. PROPOSED INSTALLED<br />

CAPACITY 510mw.<br />

100 90 80 70<br />

TEESTA PROJECT<br />

STAGE -II<br />

SALENTFEATURES:-<br />

1. CATCHMENT AREA 1772sqkms<br />

2. DISCHARGE(Dependable)9.29cumecs.<br />

3. F.R.L. 2287m.<br />

4. TYPE OF DAM-Conc.GravityDam<br />

5. T.W.L. 1592m.<br />

6. AVERAGE GROSS HEAD 683m.<br />

7. LENGTH OF TUNNEL 11.60km.<br />

8. FIRM POWER 57.38mw.<br />

9. PROPOSED INSTALLED<br />

CAPACITY 330mw.<br />

TEESTA PROJECT<br />

STAGE -III<br />

SALENTFEATURES:-<br />

1. CATCHMENT AREA 2787sqkm.<br />

2. DISCHARGE(Dependable)31cumecs<br />

3. F.R.L. 1585m.<br />

4. TYPE OF DAM(Conc.GravityDam)<br />

5. HEIGHT OF DAM 103m.<br />

6. T.W.L. 779m.<br />

7. AVERAGE GROSS HEAD 800m.<br />

8. LENGTH OF TUNNEL 12.93m.<br />

9. FIRM POWER 180mw.<br />

10. PROPOSED INSTALLED<br />

CAPACITY 1200mw.<br />

60 50<br />

DISTANCE IN KILOMETER<br />

TEESTA PROJECT<br />

STAGE-IV<br />

SALENTFEATURES:-<br />

1. CATCHMENT AREA 3859sqkms<br />

2. DISCHARGE(Dependable)56cumecs.<br />

3. F.R.L. 722m.<br />

4. TYPE OF DAM-Conc.GravityDam<br />

5. T.W.L. 589m.<br />

6. AVERAGE GROSS HEAD 183m.<br />

7. LENGTH OF TUNNEL 11km.<br />

8. FIRM POWER 82.5mw.<br />

9. PROPOSED INSTALLED<br />

CAPACITY 495mw.<br />

40<br />

LACHEN PROJECT<br />

SALENTFEATURES:-<br />

1. CATCHMENT AREA 1604sq.km.<br />

2. DISCHARGE(Dependable)9.25 cumecs.<br />

3. F.R.L. 2650m.<br />

4. TYPE OF DAM-Conc.GravityDam<br />

5. T.W.L. 2290m.<br />

6. AVERAGE GROSS HEAD 355m.<br />

7. LENGTH OF TUNNEL 4.5km.<br />

8. FIRM POWER 38.44mw.<br />

9. PROPOSED INSTALLED<br />

CAPACITY 210mw.<br />

30 20<br />

TEESTA PROJECT<br />

STAGE -I<br />

SALENTFEATURES:-<br />

10 0<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

1. CATCHMENT AREA 1461sq.km.<br />

2. DISCHARGE(Dependable)10.8 cumecs.<br />

3. F.R.L. 3258m.<br />

4. TYPE OF DAM(Conc.GravityDam) 2Nos.<br />

5. T.W.L. 2675m.<br />

6. AVERAGE GROSS HEAD 730m.<br />

7. LENGTH OF TUNNEL 7.75km.<br />

8. FIRM POWER 43.03mw.<br />

9. PROPOSED INSTALLED<br />

CAPACITY 320mw.<br />

500<br />

000<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

PLATE-2


27°<br />

45'<br />

40'<br />

35'<br />

27°<br />

30'<br />

88° 15'<br />

6200<br />

6200<br />

6400<br />

5200<br />

4200<br />

5000<br />

4600<br />

88° 15'<br />

6539<br />

4800<br />

4000<br />

6671<br />

3720<br />

4850<br />

4600<br />

4400<br />

4000<br />

4400<br />

4800<br />

5485<br />

4000<br />

5000<br />

RUKEL CHHU<br />

4000<br />

3690<br />

4565<br />

4600<br />

5215<br />

5508<br />

4400<br />

4890<br />

4600<br />

5000<br />

4600<br />

5000<br />

4340<br />

3400<br />

3200<br />

4200<br />

4600<br />

4440<br />

4200<br />

4425<br />

3000<br />

3600<br />

3800<br />

4000<br />

RUKEL H.E PROJECT<br />

F R L 2395<br />

R B L 2355<br />

M D D L 2385<br />

3800<br />

4525<br />

5288<br />

4600<br />

3190<br />

3400<br />

3800<br />

4000<br />

4400<br />

4200<br />

4400<br />

3000<br />

6888<br />

2810<br />

2600<br />

3000<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

4000<br />

6345<br />

5259<br />

8425<br />

2800<br />

3200<br />

20' 25'<br />

UMRAM CHHU<br />

RANGYONG H.E PROJECT<br />

F R L 1845<br />

R B L1795<br />

M D D L1825<br />

RANGYONG CHHU<br />

T W L 1845<br />

AVG. GROSS HEAD 541.1<br />

P.H. CAPACITY 3 X 11<br />

4200<br />

4600<br />

2600<br />

2800<br />

6065 5643<br />

3800<br />

3000<br />

5600<br />

5718<br />

3800<br />

3600<br />

3400<br />

3200<br />

3000<br />

3580<br />

5200<br />

4800<br />

5000<br />

5200<br />

4600<br />

4800<br />

3775<br />

2600<br />

4934<br />

4000<br />

3200<br />

4180<br />

4000 4200<br />

3400<br />

4400<br />

3800<br />

5070<br />

4200<br />

4600<br />

4800<br />

4390<br />

4885<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

3200<br />

4200<br />

5200<br />

4000<br />

4925<br />

4600<br />

PASSAM CHHU<br />

CANE BRIDGE<br />

T W L 1098<br />

JUMTHUL CHU<br />

F R L 1845<br />

R B L1795<br />

M D D L1825<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

2200<br />

2400<br />

2800<br />

4200<br />

2000<br />

4000<br />

4400<br />

POKHRAM CHU<br />

AVG GROSS HEAD 738.2<br />

P.H. CAPACITY 3 X 47<br />

3800<br />

4660<br />

3400<br />

2600<br />

4800<br />

4600<br />

2800<br />

3600<br />

3000<br />

4800<br />

3580<br />

2600<br />

2400<br />

5000<br />

4135<br />

5000<br />

4115<br />

1800<br />

2800<br />

3000<br />

3200<br />

3400<br />

RINGPI H.E PROJECT<br />

F R L 2966<br />

R B L 2940<br />

M D D L2933<br />

4640<br />

LINGZA H.E PROJECT<br />

F R L 1850<br />

M D D L 1830<br />

R B L 1795<br />

RINGYONG CHU<br />

3370<br />

2600<br />

2400<br />

2600<br />

RGVINGRUM CHU<br />

2000<br />

2400<br />

4940<br />

1400<br />

2800<br />

2200<br />

2400<br />

3000<br />

1800<br />

3200<br />

3355<br />

2900<br />

2600<br />

2800<br />

2600<br />

2800<br />

3000<br />

4060<br />

KISHONG CHU<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

1600<br />

2200<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

PANAN H.E PROJECT<br />

F R L 1095<br />

R B L 1050<br />

M D D L 1085<br />

3000<br />

2800<br />

2600<br />

2400<br />

4000<br />

4235<br />

DAWATHANG CHHU<br />

RINGPI CHHU<br />

RANGYONG CHHU<br />

LUDUI CHHU<br />

PEGAR CHHU<br />

T W L 1095<br />

AVG. GROSS HEAD 746<br />

P.H. CAPACITY 3 X 40<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

1200<br />

1800<br />

4200<br />

4200<br />

2000<br />

1600<br />

4400<br />

3000<br />

1400<br />

2200<br />

4400<br />

1200<br />

2200<br />

2400<br />

4600<br />

4600<br />

2725<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

2800<br />

4800<br />

5000<br />

3200<br />

KONGCHA CHU<br />

ZONG CHHU<br />

2600<br />

2800<br />

3000<br />

3200<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

4965<br />

2400<br />

2503 3065<br />

5060<br />

3000<br />

3400<br />

88° 30'<br />

3600<br />

4600<br />

4800<br />

3000<br />

3200<br />

SUSPENSION BRIDGE<br />

1800<br />

2600<br />

2400<br />

5615<br />

4400<br />

4460<br />

4195<br />

2200<br />

2000<br />

TW L 770<br />

27°<br />

30'<br />

3400<br />

3800<br />

2008<br />

88° 30'<br />

1800<br />

4600<br />

3400<br />

3600<br />

3400<br />

3200<br />

3800<br />

3400<br />

3200<br />

2800<br />

2600<br />

2200<br />

1400<br />

1600<br />

27°<br />

45'<br />

TW L 1853<br />

AVG GROSS HEAD 1110<br />

P.H. CAPACITY 2 X 35<br />

2400<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1400<br />

1000<br />

1600<br />

AVG. GROSS HEAD 322<br />

1200<br />

2400<br />

TOLUNG CHU<br />

1000<br />

2485<br />

1000<br />

1200<br />

800<br />

800<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

RAHI CHU<br />

1000<br />

1400<br />

TEESTA RIVER<br />

TEESTA H.E. PROJECT<br />

(STAGE-IV)<br />

1200<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

1400<br />

1600<br />

1430<br />

1800<br />

2845<br />

2000<br />

3200<br />

3400<br />

3000<br />

2800<br />

2600<br />

2400<br />

2200<br />

1800<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

1000<br />

1200<br />

1400<br />

1600<br />

1800<br />

2000<br />

NOTES<br />

1. NO DIMENSION SHALL BE MEASURED FROM<br />

THIS DRAWING .<br />

2. CONTOURS AND OTHER FEATURES HAVE<br />

BEEN TRACED FROM THE S.O.I. TOPO-SHEET<br />

NO. 78A/6 & 78A/10 (SCALE:- 1:50000).<br />

FEB.2004<br />

PLATE-3<br />

F/DCE730/01/02


SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM SHOWING CASCADE DEVELOPMENT<br />

OF TOLUNG RIVER BASIN (SIKKIM)<br />

ELEVATION IN METERS<br />

3000<br />

2750<br />

2500<br />

2250<br />

2000<br />

1750<br />

1500<br />

1250<br />

PANAN HE PROJECT<br />

LINGZA HE PROJECT<br />

o 2 4 6 8<br />

RANGYONG HE PROJECT<br />

DISTANSE IN KILOMETER<br />

RINGPI HE PROJECT<br />

RUKEL HE PROJECT<br />

10 12 14 16 18 20 22<br />

3000<br />

2750<br />

2500<br />

2250<br />

2000<br />

1750<br />

1500<br />

1250<br />

PLATE-4


RINGPI H.E. SCHEME - SIKKIM<br />

PLATE 4.1


TALAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT<br />

( 2 X 35 MW )<br />

RINGPI HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT<br />

( 2 X 35 MW )<br />

RANGYONG HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT<br />

( 3 X 47 MW )<br />

RUKEL HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT<br />

( 3 X 11 MW )<br />

N E P A L<br />

LINGZA HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT<br />

( 3 X 40 MW)<br />

YANGSS CHHU<br />

RAMAM OR<br />

RANGBONG KHOLA<br />

C H I N A<br />

CHAUNRIKHIANG<br />

TIKIPCHHU<br />

RIYONG KHOLA<br />

RIMBI CHHU<br />

T I B E T<br />

PHUTHUNG CHHU<br />

TONGSHIONG GLACIER<br />

TALUNG GLACIER<br />

CHOKCHURANG CHHU<br />

PREK CHHU<br />

LAMBI<br />

KHUNGME<br />

RATHANG CHHU<br />

KALEJ KHOLA<br />

TINGCHEN KHANG<br />

REFLI CHHU<br />

RISHI KHOLA<br />

GOMA CHHU<br />

RUKEL CHHU<br />

RONGDUNG CHHU<br />

GEZING<br />

REATHOK KHOLA<br />

SOMBARE NAYA BAZAR<br />

KHORA CHHU<br />

LUNGMA CHHU<br />

UMMRAM CHHU<br />

RANGYONG CHHU<br />

RANGIT RIVER<br />

KAYAM CHHU<br />

NAMCHI<br />

RINGYONG CHHU<br />

RANGPO CHHU<br />

GREAT RANGIT RIVER<br />

NACHUNGTHANGKHA<br />

THANG CHHO<br />

NAKU CHHU<br />

LANGBO CHHU<br />

THOMPHYAK CHHU<br />

POKE CHHU<br />

LHONAK CHHU<br />

RINGPI CHHU<br />

MONMU CHHU<br />

RANGPHAP CHHU<br />

ZEMU CHHU<br />

TOLUNG CHHU<br />

RUN CHHU<br />

SINGTAM<br />

TEESTA RIVER<br />

MANGKHA<br />

SIRWANI<br />

RONGNI CHHU OR RANI K<br />

TEESTA RIVER<br />

RAHI CHHU<br />

LASHA CHHU<br />

KALEP<br />

MANGAN<br />

DIKCHU<br />

TEESTA RIVER<br />

GYAMTHANG CHHU<br />

BURUM CHHU<br />

GEY CHHU<br />

TEESTA RIVER<br />

RANGPO CHHU<br />

RANGPO<br />

CHHU<br />

TARUM CHHU<br />

RABOM CHHU<br />

RI CHHU<br />

RISHI KHOLA<br />

BAKCHA<br />

DIK CHHU<br />

YUMRHANG CHHU<br />

CHUNGTHANG<br />

GANGTOK<br />

CHAKUNG CHHU<br />

CHHU<br />

RORA CHHU<br />

TAKCHOM CHHU<br />

RANGLI KHOLA<br />

W E S T B E N G A L<br />

DONGKYA CHHU<br />

TOKLUNG CHHU<br />

RATE CHHU<br />

BYU CHHU<br />

SEBOZANG CHHU<br />

LUNGZE CHHU<br />

RANGPO CHHU<br />

C H I N A<br />

T I B E T<br />

B H U T A N<br />

PANAN HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT<br />

(4 X 50MW)<br />

RONGNI STORAGE PROJECT<br />

( 3 X 65 MW)<br />

NOTES<br />

1. NO DIMENSION SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THIS DRAWING.<br />

PRE- FEASIBILITY REPORT DRAWING<br />

VICINITY MAP<br />

PLATE NO.- 6.1<br />

TEESTA HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT(STAGE-I)<br />

( 4 X 80 MW )<br />

LACHEN HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT<br />

( 3 X 70 MW )<br />

TEESTA HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT(STAGE-V)<br />

( 3 X 170 MW )<br />

DIKCHU HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT<br />

( 3 X 35 MW )<br />

LEGEND<br />

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY<br />

STATE BOUNDARY<br />

RIVER<br />

TRIBUTARY<br />

ROAD<br />

DAM SITE<br />

F/DCE730/01/02


88°<br />

27' 30''<br />

3800<br />

3600<br />

3400<br />

4000<br />

KISHONG KISHONG CHU CHU<br />

3600<br />

3800<br />

U/S COFFERDAM<br />

3200<br />

3800<br />

3000<br />

DESILTING CHAMBER<br />

(50M X 5M X 7.5M)<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

JHUMTHUL CHU<br />

3600<br />

3400<br />

27° 40' 00''<br />

3200<br />

RINGPI CHU<br />

DIVERSION TUNNEL 3.3 M Ø<br />

HORSE SHOE SHAPED<br />

D/S COFFERDAM<br />

SILT FLUSHING TUNNEL<br />

ADIT-I<br />

3200<br />

3000<br />

2800<br />

2600<br />

2600<br />

2600<br />

2400<br />

HEAD RACE TUNNEL 3.3 M Ø<br />

HORSE SHOE SHAPED<br />

ADIT-2<br />

2400<br />

2200<br />

3400<br />

3800<br />

2200<br />

2600<br />

INCLINED PRESSURE SHAFT 1.5 M Ø<br />

SURGE SHAFT 10 M Ø<br />

3200<br />

ADIT-3<br />

30002800<br />

2200<br />

T.R.T. 3.3 M Ø<br />

H.S.SHAPE<br />

TRANSFORMER<br />

CAVERN<br />

SWITCHYARD<br />

2400<br />

2600<br />

2600<br />

2800<br />

3000<br />

2800<br />

POWER HOUSE<br />

3200<br />

3200<br />

M.A.T.<br />

NOTES<br />

3000<br />

ISHANA<br />

2400<br />

LB<br />

3200<br />

2200<br />

2000<br />

3200<br />

3000<br />

2800<br />

1800<br />

2600<br />

2200<br />

2000<br />

1600<br />

1600<br />

2400<br />

1800<br />

2. CONTOURS AND OTHER FEATURES HAVE<br />

PLATE NO.- 6.2<br />

1. NO DIMENSION SHALL BE MEASURED FROM<br />

THIS DRAWING<br />

BEEN TRACED FROM THE S.O.I. TOPO-SHEET<br />

NO. 78A/6 (SCALE:- 1:50000)<br />

PRE- FEASIBILITY REPORT DRAWING<br />

LAY-OUT PLAN<br />

F/DCE730/01/02


3200<br />

KISHONG CHU<br />

3000<br />

U/S COFFERDAM<br />

DESILTING CHAMBER<br />

(50M X 5M X 7.5M)<br />

JHUMTHUL CHU<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

DIVERSION TUNNEL 3.3 M Ø<br />

HORSE SHOE SHAPED<br />

D/S COFFERDAM<br />

RINGPI CHU<br />

ADIT-I<br />

SILT FLUSHING TUNNEL<br />

0.75M.X 1.5M. D-SHAPE<br />

27°<br />

40' 00''<br />

3000<br />

H.R.T.3.3M.Ø H.S. SHAPE<br />

NOTES<br />

1. NO DIMENSION SHALL BE MEASURED FROM<br />

THIS DRAWING<br />

2. CONTOURS AND OTHER FEATURES HAVE<br />

BEEN TRACED FROM THE S.O.I. TOPO-SHEET<br />

NO. 78A/6 (SCALE:- 1:50000)<br />

PLATE NO.- 6.3<br />

PRE- FEASIBILITY REPORT DRAWING<br />

DAM AREA<br />

LAY-OUT PLAN<br />

F/DCE730/01/02


88° 27' 30''<br />

2000<br />

2200<br />

2400<br />

2600<br />

2800<br />

3000<br />

ADIT-3<br />

H.R.T. 3.3M.Ø H.S.SHAPE<br />

2000<br />

INCLINED PRESSURE SHAFT 1.5 M Ø<br />

SURGE SHAFT 10 M Ø<br />

RINGPI CHU<br />

3000<br />

SWITCHYARD<br />

(150M. X 115M.)<br />

T.R.T. 3.3 M Ø<br />

H.S.SHAPE<br />

TRANSFORMER<br />

CAVERN<br />

2800<br />

2600<br />

POWER HOUSE<br />

2400<br />

M.A.T.<br />

2200<br />

2000<br />

2400<br />

2200<br />

1800<br />

1800<br />

2000<br />

NOTES<br />

1. NO DIMENSION SHALL BE MEASURED FROM<br />

THIS DRAWING<br />

2. CONTOURS AND OTHER FEATURES HAVE<br />

BEEN TRACED FROM THE S.O.I. TOPO-SHEET<br />

NO. 78A/6 (SCALE:- 1:50000)<br />

PLATE NO.- 6.4<br />

PRE- FEASIBILITY REPORT DRAWING<br />

POWER HOUSE AREA<br />

LAY-OUT PLAN<br />

F/DCE730/01/02


FRL2966.00<br />

MDDL 2963.00<br />

EL 2955.00<br />

EL 2950.00<br />

TRESTLE<br />

EL 2970.0<br />

?<br />

?<br />

?<br />

DESILTING CHAMBER<br />

(50M. X 5M.X7.5M.)<br />

?<br />

GATE OPERATION<br />

CHAMBER<br />

EL 2970.00<br />

SILT FLUSHING TUNNEL<br />

(0.75M.X1.5M. D-SHAPE)<br />

STEEL LINED PRESSURE SHAFT 1.5M. Ø<br />

?<br />

HRT 3.3M. Ø H.S.SHAPE<br />

EL 2975.00M.<br />

SURGE SHAFT<br />

10M. Ø ?<br />

ADIT TO P.S.<br />

3.3M.Ø D-SHAPE<br />

EL 2926.60<br />

1<br />

250<br />

ADIT TO P.S.<br />

3.3M.Ø D-SHAPE<br />

EL. 1854.63<br />

?<br />

18000<br />

EL.1883.00<br />

BUS DUCT<br />

30000<br />

?<br />

POWER HOUSE CAVERN<br />

14000<br />

?<br />

TRANSFORMER CAVERN<br />

CABLE TUNNEL<br />

EL.1866.00<br />

T.R.T. 3.3M.Ø H.S.SHAPE<br />

C.C. BLOCKS<br />

NOTES:<br />

PRE- FEASIBILITY REPORT DRAWING<br />

MAR.04<br />

TWL1853.00<br />

COFFERWALL<br />

1 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS AND LEVELS IN METERS.<br />

WATER CONDUCTOR SYSTEM<br />

L-SECTION<br />

PLATE NO.-6.5<br />

2 NO DIMENSION SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THIS DRAWING.<br />

F/DCE730/01/02


L8<br />

L7<br />

?<br />

L6<br />

?<br />

L5<br />

144000 30000 126000<br />

3000(TYP.)<br />

4000(TYP.)<br />

L4<br />

L3<br />

DAM TOP EL 2970.00<br />

?<br />

L2<br />

L1<br />

300000<br />

S3<br />

?<br />

S2<br />

S1<br />

UPSTREAM ELEVATION<br />

R1<br />

R2<br />

RADIAL GATE 4000 X 7000<br />

?<br />

NSL<br />

ANTICIPATED ROCK PROFILE<br />

R3 R4 R5 R6<br />

?<br />

NOTES:<br />

1 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM AND LEVELS IN METRES.<br />

PRE- FEASIBILITY REPORT DRAWING<br />

MAR.04<br />

RAILING<br />

DAM<br />

UPSTREAM ELEVATION<br />

PLATE NO.-6.6<br />

2. NO DIMENSION SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THIS DRAWING.<br />

R7<br />

?<br />

F/DCE730/01/02


1<br />

1<br />

FRL EL. 2966.00<br />

MDDL EL. 2963.00<br />

STOPLOG GANTRY<br />

CRANE<br />

DAM TOP EL. 2970.00<br />

STOPLOG GATE GROOVE<br />

EL ±2930.00<br />

STEEL LINER<br />

CREST EL 2950.00<br />

RBL ±EL 2940.00<br />

GROUT CURTAIN HOLES<br />

?<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

ROAD<br />

FOUNDATION<br />

GALLERY<br />

DRAINAGE HOLE<br />

BREAST WALL<br />

AIR VENT PIPE<br />

EL. 2957.00<br />

RADIAL GATE(4M. X 7M.)<br />

HIGH PERFORMENCE CONC.<br />

BUCKET INVERT EL 2943.00<br />

TRUNION BEAM<br />

? ? ? ? ?<br />

SPILLWAY- MAXIMUM SECTION<br />

1<br />

1<br />

NORMAL T W L<br />

7000 LONG ROCK ANCHORS<br />

@1500 c/c STAGGERED<br />

1<br />

1<br />

CONCRETE APRON<br />

MAX. T W L<br />

COMPACTED BACKFILL<br />

DAM TOP EL 2970.00<br />

FRL EL 2966.00<br />

MDDL EL 2963.00<br />

1<br />

EL. VARIES<br />

0.1<br />

?<br />

DAM AXIS<br />

NON- OVERFLOW SECTION<br />

NOTES:<br />

1 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM AND LEVELS IN METRES.<br />

PRE- FEASIBILITY REPORT DRAWING<br />

MAR.04<br />

0.8<br />

? ?<br />

2 NO DIMENSION SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THIS DRAWING.<br />

1<br />

DAM<br />

SPILLWAY & NON-OVER FLOW<br />

CROSS-SECTION<br />

PLATE NO.-6.7<br />

F/DCE730/01/02


HRT3.3 M. Ø<br />

Ø3300<br />

Ø10000<br />

TYP. SECTION - SURGE SHAFT<br />

2000 LONG 25 Ø ROCK BOLTS/<br />

ANCHORS 1000 c/c<br />

Ø1650<br />

Ø3300<br />

TYP. SECTION - HRT<br />

CONC. LINING 225 THK.<br />

50 THK.<br />

SHOTCRETE<br />

4000 LONG 25 Ø ROCK BOLTS/<br />

ANCHORS 1500 c/c<br />

100 THK. SHOTCRETE<br />

WITH WIREMESH<br />

CONC.LINING 750 THK.<br />

PRESSURE SHAFT<br />

7500<br />

5000<br />

SECTION - DESILTING CHAMBER<br />

Ø1500<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

2000 LONG 25 Ø ROCK BOLTS/<br />

ANCHORS 1000 c/c(IF REQUIRED)<br />

32Ø 5000 LONG ROCK BOLTS /<br />

ANCHORS @ 2000 c/c<br />

BACK FILL 750 THK.<br />

STEEL LINER<br />

50THK.<br />

SHOTCRETE<br />

100 THK. SHOTCRETE<br />

WITH WIREMESH<br />

R.C.C. LINING 300 THK.<br />

32Ø 5000 LNG ROCK BOLTS/<br />

ANCHORS @ 1500 c/c<br />

TYP. SECTION - DIVERSION TUNNEL<br />

NOTE :-<br />

1 ALL DIMENSIONS AREIN MILIMETRES AND LEVELS<br />

IN METRE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.<br />

2 NO DIMENSION SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THIS<br />

DRAWING.<br />

PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT DRAWING<br />

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION<br />

OF CONSTITUENTS OF WATER<br />

TYP. SECTION - PRESSURE SHAFT CONDUCTOR SYSTEM & DIVERSION TUNNEL<br />

Ø3300<br />

2000 LONG 25 Ø ROCK BOLTS/<br />

ANCHORS 1000 c/c<br />

Ø1650<br />

Ø3300<br />

MAR.2004<br />

CONC. LINING 225 THK.<br />

50 THK.<br />

SHOTCRETE<br />

PLATE NO.- 6.8<br />

00<br />

F/DCE/730/01/02


220KV<br />

BUS1<br />

BUS CVT-1<br />

220kV<br />

BUS-II<br />

BUS CVT-2<br />

FUTURE<br />

CVT<br />

EX. Tr.<br />

NGT<br />

UNIT -II<br />

S.A.<br />

XLPE CABLE<br />

GSU Tr.<br />

SC<br />

SA<br />

G-II<br />

PT<br />

PT<br />

UAT<br />

64G1<br />

64G2<br />

TO 220KV<br />

FEEDER-1<br />

PTSP<br />

CVT<br />

BUS<br />

COUPLER<br />

EX. Tr.<br />

NGT<br />

UNIT -I<br />

S.A.<br />

XLPE CABLE<br />

GSU Tr.1Ø,15 MVA<br />

11/ 220/ 3 KV<br />

64G1<br />

64G2<br />

TO 220KV<br />

FEEDER-2<br />

UAT<br />

11 / 0.415KV,500KVA<br />

SC PTSP<br />

SA<br />

PT<br />

PT<br />

G-I<br />

35 MW,11 KV<br />

FOR<br />

METERING &<br />

PROTECTION<br />

FOR<br />

DVR DUPLICATE<br />

PROTECTION<br />

CVT<br />

SA<br />

S.A.<br />

VED PAL<br />

JAN, 2004<br />

SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM<br />

BHU DEV<br />

V.K.SINGH<br />

NH/DEM/RIN/SLD/01<br />

PLATE 8.1<br />

00


Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2x 35MW)<br />

ANNEXURES


Annexure 4.1<br />

GEOLOGY OF THE AREA AROUND THE PROPOSED RINGPI<br />

HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT, TEESTA BASIN, SIKKIM<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Central Electricity Authority (CEA), as a part <strong>of</strong> an exercise to<br />

estimate the balance hydroelectric potential in the county have identified 399<br />

schemes with installed capacity <strong>of</strong> about 1,50,000 MW in various river basins.<br />

The schemes thus identified were subjected to ranking studies applying different<br />

parameters. On the basis <strong>of</strong> ranking studies 162 schemes with probable<br />

installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 50,600 MW spread over 16 States have been selected for<br />

preparation Pre-Feasibility Reports (PFR’s) in first phase. The schemes found<br />

feasible are proposed to be taken up for further development during X and XI<br />

Five Year Plans.<br />

The proposed <strong>Ringpi</strong> Hydroelectric Project is one <strong>of</strong> the ten schemes<br />

located in Teesta Basin in Sikkim. As per the layouts provided by National<br />

Hydroelectric <strong>Power</strong> Corporation (NHPC), this run river scheme includes<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> diversion dam / weir across <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu downstream <strong>of</strong> Tolung<br />

(27 O 40’ 35” N: 88 O 26’ 37”E, 78 0/6), a water conductor system including 7.2 km<br />

long head race tunnel (HRT) and powerhouse with probable installed capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> 160 MW located on the right bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu upstream <strong>of</strong> Myong (27 O 37”<br />

21’ N: 88 O 27” 09’ E, 78 0/6 ).<br />

REGIONAL GEOLOGY<br />

The area around the proposed project is located in North Sikkim in Central<br />

Crystalline axial region and is characterised by sharp crested snow bound<br />

mountains. The ridges trend both in E-W and N-S directions. Teesta River,


main draining agency <strong>of</strong> Sikkim flows almost N-S in the area. The important<br />

tributaries <strong>of</strong> Teesta are Lach Chhu, Toloung Chhu Chakung Chu, <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chu<br />

and their numerous tributaries. The valleys <strong>of</strong> rivers are U-shaped and small<br />

streams have formed deep gorges. Vegetation is observed up to EI . 3.900 m<br />

and many lakes are present at high altitudes.<br />

The area around the proposed project has been mapped by Raina (1966)<br />

Chakraborti and Banerjee (1982), Kumar et al (1984), Neogi et al (1984) and<br />

Neogi et al (1986). The stratigraphic sequence established by the <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> GSI<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> geological mapping is given below:<br />

GROUP LITHOLOGY<br />

Gondwana Grits, pebble cum boulder beds<br />

2<br />

and carbonaceous shales with<br />

occasional coal seams, pegmatite,<br />

quartzite (Tourmaline bearing)<br />

Daling Inter bedded quartzite and chlorite<br />

sericite phyllite / schist.<br />

Lingza Granite<br />

Quartzite/Biotite schist<br />

Chungthang Interbedded quartzite and<br />

Central Crystalline Gneissic<br />

Complex<br />

garnetiferous quartz biotite schist .<br />

Calc – silicate rock / marble.<br />

Garnet – kyanite – sillimanite –<br />

biotite – quartz – schist.<br />

Banded gneiss with augen gneiss<br />

and quartz – biotite gneiss.<br />

Augen gneiss


The area falls within axial belt <strong>of</strong> Central Crystalline Zone <strong>of</strong> the North<br />

Sikkim Himalayas where the rock types are mainly high grade gneisses (CCGC)<br />

having interbands <strong>of</strong> metasedimentaries represented by calc – silicate /<br />

quartzite, high grade schists and their fine inter laminations. The<br />

metasedimentaries occur as enclaves in the high-grade gneisses in the area<br />

around the proposed project. All these rock types are <strong>of</strong>ten intruded by<br />

discordant tourmaline bearing quartz veins and pegmatite.<br />

The higher grade gneisses belonging to the Central Crystalline Gneissic<br />

Complex (CCGC) Group vary in composition from a gneiss in which feldspar is<br />

predominant with respect to quartz to quartz biotite gneiss in which feldspar is<br />

almost absent (Chakraborti & Banerjee, 1982 and Neogi et al, 1986) with<br />

frequent association <strong>of</strong> garnet, tourmaline and sillimanite / kyanite depending up<br />

on bulk chemical composition. While the former type is well foliated with streaks<br />

<strong>of</strong> biotite, the latter is compact and poorly foliated. The different types <strong>of</strong> these<br />

gneisses occurring at different structural levels are banded gneiss, augen gneiss<br />

and streaky gneiss. A gradual passage from one type to other type, both<br />

vertically and laterally, is rather common. The banded type is characterized by<br />

alternate bands <strong>of</strong> quartz feldspar and biotite. These bands are at places<br />

stretched giving rise to augens which are composed predominantly <strong>of</strong> single<br />

grains <strong>of</strong> feldspar or occassionally quartz or their aggregate. The latter may be<br />

the result <strong>of</strong> metamorphic differentiation. The augens are both deformed or<br />

undeformed and are invariably warped around by biotite flakes defining the<br />

gneissic – foliation. The augens are stretched in the direction <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

schistosity. The high grade gneisses are <strong>of</strong>ten intruded by tourmaline granite at<br />

places and are associated with interbands <strong>of</strong> calc silicate – quartzite and<br />

garnetiferous biotite schist and various other schists belonging to Chungthang<br />

Group. These have locally been mapped as Kanchendzonga Gneiss,<br />

Chungthang Gneiss and Darjeeling Gneiss by various workers earlier. According<br />

to Neogi et al (1986), there exists a complete gradation both laterally and in down<br />

dip direction amongst above mentioned gneisses. Their repetition is due to<br />

3


normal morphological variation and unlinked with folding and thrusting. Various<br />

structura/textural types <strong>of</strong> these gneisses stated above have also been observed<br />

in all the so called gneissic groups <strong>of</strong> Central Crystalline axial region and have<br />

been referred as “High Grade Gneisses” <strong>of</strong> Central Crystalline Belt which are<br />

also comparable to Darjeeling Gneisses <strong>of</strong> Lesser Himalayas.<br />

The metasedimentaries <strong>of</strong> the area belonging to the Chungthang Group<br />

are represented by a sequence <strong>of</strong> lithounits varying from calcareous to<br />

arrnaceous and argillaceous lith<strong>of</strong>acies. These comprise calc silicate rocks,<br />

quartzite, high grade micaceous schists occasional amphibolites and their fine<br />

grained interlaminations.<br />

Neogi et al (1986) have clubbed together calc silicate rocks and quartzites<br />

as these invariably occur together. Prominent bands <strong>of</strong> these rocks have been<br />

observed near Be and Myong, north <strong>of</strong> Talung gompa and near Phygn and south<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kishong. These have NE-SW trend are locally folded. Calcareous bands are<br />

easily identified by their greenish colour within banded calc silicate / quartzite<br />

assemblage. Apart from carbonates and quartz, stumpy diopside and needle<br />

shaped tremolite have also been observed in these. Garnet is generally leached<br />

giving rise to ferruginous staining. The quartzite is sericite quartzite. Thin<br />

laminations <strong>of</strong> biotite are observed in quartzite at places. The rocks are<br />

occasionally boudinaged. Carbonaceous biotite schist is found associated with<br />

southern west calc silicate / quartzite band. Tourmaline bearing silica veins and<br />

pegmatites have been observed occasionally intruding these rock types.<br />

Daling Series <strong>of</strong> Raina (1966) having two zones viz phyllite zone and<br />

schistose zone has been mapped as low grade metamorphites <strong>of</strong> Daling Group<br />

by Kumar et al (1984). Daling Group comprises quartz – chlorite – sericite schist<br />

phyllite, quartz – sericite schist, quartz chlorite phyllite <strong>of</strong>ten associated with thin<br />

interbands <strong>of</strong> quartzite. The low grade sedimentaries belonging to Daling<br />

Series from southern part <strong>of</strong> the area structurally underlie the Lingtze Granite<br />

4


Gneiss. Near Gyathang and at some other places, the frequency <strong>of</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />

garnet is slightly higher and its grain size is controlled by the original bulk<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> the rock. According to Kumar et al (1984) these<br />

metasedimentaries typically resemble the Gorubathan Formation <strong>of</strong> Daling Group<br />

and hence been named “low Grade Daling” .<br />

The granite gneiss which crops out near north <strong>of</strong> Senkhalang with an E-W<br />

trend and northerly dips is also observed NW <strong>of</strong> Kendong and north <strong>of</strong> Karsang<br />

to form the western limb <strong>of</strong> major antiformal closure. It occupies a unique<br />

position between low-grade and high-grade metasedimentaries and is<br />

conformable to both. This granite is a well foliated, coarse grained, sheared<br />

streaky biotite gneiss and occasionally contains garnets. At places, augens <strong>of</strong><br />

quartz and felspar stretched parallel to the foliation plane are recorded within<br />

this unit.<br />

Tourmaline and biotite bearing granites are the younger granites having<br />

discordant relationship with high-grade gneisses and high-grade<br />

metasedimentaries. Compositionally, these are mainly quartz-feldspar rich<br />

leucogranite varying from coarse grained to fine grained aplitic variety and shows<br />

disseminated flakes <strong>of</strong> biotite. Tourmaline grains are observed generally in<br />

structural highs.<br />

Gondwanas, according to Raina (1966) include grits, pebble cum boulder<br />

beds and carbonaceous shales with ocassional coal seams. Pebble cum boulder<br />

bed forms the marker horizon for Gondwana. Arkosic sandstone (felspathic grit)<br />

forms the other main rock type. It is light yellow to dark grey coloured and is<br />

infolded within pebble beds.<br />

5


STRUCTURE AND TECTONICS<br />

The area exposes a sequence <strong>of</strong> gneissic rocks and associated<br />

metasedimentary rocks <strong>of</strong> Central Crystalline Belt <strong>of</strong> North Sikkim and the<br />

structural fabric elements observed pertain to features in the area predominated<br />

by high grade litho-facies which have undergone polyphase deformation and<br />

metamorphism. The primary structures include compositional banding. The<br />

gneisses show lithological banding which can be attributed to metamorphic<br />

differentiation. Bedded characters are observed only in calc silicate – quartzite<br />

multilayers. The high-grade schists also show compositional banding <strong>of</strong> alternate<br />

quartz rich and calc silicate rich bands. There is no evidence however to indicate<br />

that these bandings are relict <strong>of</strong> primary sedimentary banding. However, broad<br />

parallelism <strong>of</strong> the bandings and later imposed pervasive planes, S2, indicates<br />

that these could be transposed.<br />

The secondary structures include planar surfaces like gneisses foliation,<br />

schistosity which include bedding schistosity (S1), regional schistosity (S2) and<br />

fracture cleavage (S3). Bed Gneissic foliation forms the most prominent fabric<br />

element <strong>of</strong> high grade metamorphic tectonics. These ‘S’ surfaces are marked by<br />

parallel lithological layering and preferred dimensional orientation <strong>of</strong> minerals.<br />

The gneissic foliation in the area generally trends NE-SW with moderate NW<br />

dips.<br />

The metasedimentaries associated with the gneisses show a pervasive<br />

schistosity where lithological layering is absent. The fabric is defined by<br />

preferred orientation <strong>of</strong> tabular mica crystals. Bedding schistosity (S1) is<br />

incipient and is parallel to the compositional banding in metasedimentaries. This<br />

‘S’ surface could not be related to any tectonic structure in the area and could be<br />

described as another inherited fabric element along with bedding. The regional<br />

schistosity (S2) is most pervasive structural element in metasedimentaries. The<br />

axial plane schistosity is symmetrically oriented with respect to axial planes <strong>of</strong><br />

6


folds (F1). The trend <strong>of</strong> regional schistosity is parallel to the gneissic foliation.<br />

The fracture cleavage (S3) is defined by discrete parallel fractures and are also<br />

axial plane cleavages related to F2 crenulation. Due to varying styles <strong>of</strong> the F2<br />

folds the orientation <strong>of</strong> the S3 surfaces varies with respect to regional schistosity<br />

‘S2’. The linear structurs include striping lineation, pucker axis lineation and<br />

mineral lineation.<br />

The area comprises a sequence <strong>of</strong> high-grade metasedimentaries and<br />

gneisses that show evidence <strong>of</strong> having undergone polyphase deformation with<br />

complex pattern <strong>of</strong> folds due to repeated super-imposition <strong>of</strong> successive fold<br />

forms. Grouping <strong>of</strong> different generations <strong>of</strong> folds on the basis <strong>of</strong> styles and<br />

spatial attitudes has not been possible due to their complex forms. Broadly three<br />

generations <strong>of</strong> fold movement could be deciphered. F1 folds, the earliest<br />

recognizable folds have compositional banding and bedding schistosity as their<br />

form surface and are <strong>of</strong> tight isoclinal reclined to inclined folds. Their style and<br />

spatial orientation as observed in the area is comparable to these observed in<br />

Daling Group <strong>of</strong> rocks exposed south <strong>of</strong> present area. The F2 folds have<br />

involved all the above mentioned surfaces. These show a variety <strong>of</strong> styles<br />

ranging from appressed isoclinal folds to open warps, small-scale chevron folds<br />

or multi-hinged disharmonic folds. The calc silicate / marble quartzite bands<br />

show regional warps along NW-SE axis due to this phase <strong>of</strong> folding. The effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> F3 folds have been observed mainly on regional scale. On macro scale they<br />

are <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> minor broad warps that have folded the weakly developed S3<br />

planes. No planar surface related to this phase <strong>of</strong> folding are apparent. F3 warps<br />

are only locally developed in high-grade metasedimentaries and have N-S<br />

oriented axis.<br />

Zones <strong>of</strong> intense mylonitisation have been observed in the gneisses but<br />

there is no basis to conclude that these could represent planes <strong>of</strong> thrusting on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> evidence like distinct truncation <strong>of</strong> lithounits reorientation <strong>of</strong> major<br />

folds (F2), development <strong>of</strong> small scale faults etc.. Chakraborty and Banerjee<br />

7


(1982) have marked NNW-SSE trending thrust near Manual and NW-SE trending<br />

thrust near Naga. Neogi et al (1984) observed minor slips and faults occurring<br />

commonly within gneisses and metasedimentaries along S3 planes near hinge<br />

zone <strong>of</strong> F2 folds. The slips are more common where folds are tight. A meso<br />

scale normal vertical fault trending N-S has been found with in low grade<br />

metasedimentaries about 2 km north <strong>of</strong> Brang village. Silicification, chloritization<br />

and mylonitization are found along this fault plane.<br />

SEISMOTECTONICS AND SEISMICITY<br />

Seismotectonically the area under reference is located in Axial Belt <strong>of</strong><br />

Central Crystalline Zones <strong>of</strong> North Sikkim. According to Narula at al (2000) the<br />

northern part <strong>of</strong> the area is occupied by poorly metamorphosed sequence<br />

(Tethyan) folded during Himalayan Orogeny. Similar tectonic pockets<br />

representing Gondwana sequence crop out within Rangit Window as well as<br />

lenticular tectonic wedge along the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT). The northern<br />

Tethyan Belt is followed successively to the south by high-grade complex <strong>of</strong><br />

Central Crystallines and low-grade complex <strong>of</strong> Lesser Himalayan rock worked<br />

during Himalayan Orogeny. The latter packet is exposed within tectonic windows<br />

as well as linear belt between Main Central Thrust (MCT) and MBT. South <strong>of</strong><br />

MBT the foot hill region is occupied by sequence <strong>of</strong> frontal belt affected by the<br />

terminal phase <strong>of</strong> the Himalayan Orogeny. Adjacent Peninsular tract is covered<br />

by Quaternary alluvial fill along the foredeep. In the southwestern part,<br />

Peninsular element is represented by small inliers <strong>of</strong> gneissic complex and<br />

Rajmahal Trap. The basement gneissic complex, representing a part <strong>of</strong> Shillong<br />

massif along with marine transgressive cover are present in south eastern part.<br />

Like other parts <strong>of</strong> Himalayas, this area is the high grade Central Crystallines<br />

from comparatively lower grade Lesser Himalayan packages which are<br />

separated from the Siwalik Belt by MBT. At places, particularly towards east,<br />

several subsidiary thrust are presented between MCT and MBT. Besides these,<br />

several approximately N-S trending gravity faults are present particularly within<br />

8


northern Tethyan Belt and the southern foot hill belt. Within northern Tethyan<br />

Belt these N-S faults define some well knows graben structures, viz. Pum Qu<br />

Graben and Yadong Gulu Graben. In the former, the faults affecting the<br />

Quaternary glacial deposits are clearly evident. The latter graben is considered<br />

to be longest one in Tibetan Plateau and is segmented into several N-S smaller<br />

grabens. The foredeep tract east <strong>of</strong> Munger – Saharsha Ridge is known as<br />

Purnia Basin where Gondwana sequence has developed over the rifted<br />

basement. The structural configuration <strong>of</strong> this foredeep region is architectured by<br />

a set <strong>of</strong> almost N-S trending faults resulting in development <strong>of</strong> alternate horst and<br />

graben structures. The westernmost is the Munger – Saharsha Ridge which<br />

alternates towards east by Purnia Basin. The western and eastern boundaries <strong>of</strong><br />

Purnia Basin are defined by the Munger - Saharsha Ridge Morginal Fault<br />

(MSRF) and Malda Kishanganj Fault (MKF). The former fault known as Sainthia<br />

– Brahmani Fault further south, along which cluster <strong>of</strong> earthquakes have been<br />

recorded by the Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> India, has been found seismically active.<br />

Further east the prominent tectonic feature is the Rangpur Ridge bound by MKF<br />

and Jangipur – Goribandha Fault, Teesta Fault and Katihar – Nailphamari Fault.<br />

Several subsidiary faults, parallel to Teesta Fault forming grabens are reported<br />

from ridge. Gondwana sequence is found to have developed within these<br />

grabens. Along with transverse faults, several lineaments cutting across the<br />

Himalayan belt are also present. These exhibit NE and NW trends. The NE<br />

trending Azun Lineament considered to be trace <strong>of</strong> northern extension <strong>of</strong> East<br />

Patna Fault, Kanchanjunga Lineament and NW-SE trending Teesta and Purnia<br />

lineaments are other prominent transverse lineaments. The basement contours<br />

corroborate the presence <strong>of</strong> Purnia Saddle and Rangpur Ridge.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the earthquakes in this area are shallow focus (


subdued seismicity. Of the 51 seismic events recorded in the region over a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> 58 years between 1935 and 1993, five had magnitude more than 5.5<br />

i.e. ranging between 5.5 and 6.0 and rest 46 had magnitude between 4.5 and 5.5<br />

and 8 events with depth <strong>of</strong> focus >40 km. The depth <strong>of</strong> focus for one event, that<br />

<strong>of</strong> 21.05.1935, has been interpreted to be 140 km. As such observed seismic<br />

events are mostly concentrated in Main Himalayan Belt. Keeping in view the<br />

seismotectonic set up and seismicity, the area has been kept in Zone – IV as per<br />

Map <strong>of</strong> India Showing Seismic Zones (IS - 1893 (part –I) : 2002).<br />

GEOTECHNICAL APPRAISAL<br />

The geological map <strong>of</strong> the area indicates that the proposed project would<br />

be located in the Axial Belt Central Crystalline Zone <strong>of</strong> North Sikkim. The area<br />

exposes banded gneiss with augen gneiss and quartz biotite gneiss belonging to<br />

Central Crystalline Gneiss Complex having associated interbands <strong>of</strong> calc silicate<br />

rock / marble and quartzite / biotite quartz schist belonging to high grade<br />

metasedimentaries <strong>of</strong> Chungthang Group. The foliation is well developed and<br />

trends in NNW-SSE to NNE-SSW direction. The rocks are jointed and traversed<br />

by joints and shared / mylonitised zones.<br />

The site <strong>of</strong> the proposed diversion structure across <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu is located<br />

downstream <strong>of</strong> Tolung and exposes banded gneiss with augen gneiss and quartz<br />

biotite gneiss. The foliation trends N-S and dips steeply towards east. It is<br />

recommended that the final location and type <strong>of</strong> the structure be decided after<br />

assessing the extent <strong>of</strong> overburden in river bed and on abutments and availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> suitable site for locating intake structure for water conductor system. The<br />

proposed water conductor system comprising 7.2 km long head race tunnel<br />

(HRT) is envisaged on the right bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu. The HRT is likely to<br />

encounter the gneisses belonging Central Crystalline Gneiss Complex in the<br />

major portion and bands <strong>of</strong> calc silicate rock / marble in some reaches. These<br />

rocks are likely to be good to fair tunneling media except for reaches where<br />

10


mylotinised / shear zones are encountered. The conditions in such zones are<br />

likely to be fair to poor. The preliminary layout <strong>of</strong> the project shows that there is<br />

no possibility <strong>of</strong> having an intermediate construction adit if the present alignment<br />

<strong>of</strong> HRT is retained. It is suggested that if required, possibility <strong>of</strong> having one<br />

construction adit may be looked into by giving a kink in the alignment and shifting<br />

the HRT towards valley in the middle reaches. However, the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rock cover has to be ensured while carrying out such an exercise. The proposed<br />

powerhouse with installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 160 MW is envisaged on right bank <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu upstream <strong>of</strong> Ishong. The area exposes gneisses belonging to<br />

CCGC. The foliation trends NE-SW with moderate dips towards NW. Keeping<br />

in view the topography and rock types present in the area it is suggested that the<br />

structure be designed as an underground one. The project area is located in<br />

Zone –IV as per Map <strong>of</strong> India Showing Seismic Zones (IS – 1893 (part-I) : 2002).<br />

Therefore, seismic coefficient as required for the area will have to be<br />

incorporated in the designs <strong>of</strong> appurtenant structures <strong>of</strong> the project. This<br />

preliminary geotechnical appraisal is based on regional geological set up <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area without field visit to the project site.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Chakraborti, B., and Banerjee, H., (1982). Geology and Structure <strong>of</strong> the Area<br />

around Chungthang - Mangan – Tolung, North Sikkim. Unpubl. Prog. Rep.<br />

Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> India, F.S. 1980-81.<br />

Kumar, J.P., and Mitra, P.K. (1984). Geology and Structure <strong>of</strong> the Area Around<br />

Sakkyong, Mangan, Dikchu, Lingi and Mangka Covering Parts <strong>of</strong> North South<br />

and East Sikkim. Unpubl. Prog. Rep. Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> India, F.S. 1982-83.<br />

Narula, P.L. Acharayya, S.K., and Banerjee, J., (Eds) (2000). Seismotectonic<br />

Atlas <strong>of</strong> India and its Environs, GSI Publication.<br />

11


Neogi S., Purkaint, B. and Samaddar, A.K. (1984). Geology <strong>of</strong> the Area Around<br />

Tashiding – Lapdang – Maidang La-Karshang – Lampokhari – Khungre, West<br />

District, Sikkim. Unpubl. Prog. Rep. Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> India, F.S. 1982-83.<br />

Neogi, S., Kumar, J.P., Mitra, N.D., Samaddar, A.K. and Dawande, A.K. (1986).<br />

Geology <strong>of</strong> the Area Around Tolung – Thijp, - Kishong, North Sikkim District,<br />

Sikkim. Unpubl. Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> India Prog. Preg., F.S. 1983-84.<br />

Raina, U.K. (1966). Geological Mapping in the western part <strong>of</strong> Sikkim. Unpubl.<br />

Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> India, Rep., F.S. 1965-66.<br />

12


1<br />

Annexure-4.2<br />

TECHNICAL REPORT ON SEISMIC HISTORY AND SEISMICITY OF THE<br />

TEESTA BASIN OF SIKXKIM COVERING PROPOSED SITES FOR<br />

HYDROELECTRIC SCHEMES<br />

Historical and instrumentally recorded data on earthquakes show that the whole area <strong>of</strong><br />

the proposed sites for hydroelectric schemes at Dikchu, Rongni Storage, Panan,<br />

Namlum, Zedang, Teesta St-I, <strong>Ringpi</strong>, Lingza, Rukel and Rangyong in Sikkim lies in a<br />

region liable to damage due to moderate to great earthquakes. Noteworthy earthquakes<br />

which affected the region in the past are (i) the Cachar earthquake <strong>of</strong> 10.01.1869<br />

(Magnitude= 7.5 on Richter scale), (ii) the Shillong plateau earthquake <strong>of</strong> 12.06.1897<br />

(Magnitude= 8.7), (iii) the Dhubri earthquake <strong>of</strong> 02.07.1930 (Magnitude= 7.1), (iv) the<br />

Bihar-Nepal Border earthquake <strong>of</strong> 15.01.1934 (Magnitude= 8.3), (v) the Assam<br />

earthquake <strong>of</strong> 15.08.1950 (Magnitude= 8.5) and (vi) the Nepal-India Border earthquake<br />

<strong>of</strong> 21.08.1988 (Magnitude= 6.4). The 1897 earthquake had its epicentral tract in and<br />

around Shillong where there was considerable damage to lives and property, in addition<br />

to other effects <strong>of</strong> very strong ground shaking. One <strong>of</strong> the significant observations made<br />

on this earthquake was that boulders were thrown out vertically upwards from their<br />

original places showing that the force <strong>of</strong> earthquake motion exceeded the force due to<br />

gravity, at least momentarily. The earthquake was followed by a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

aftershocks.<br />

In addition to the above significant earthquakes, the region has experienced<br />

several earthquakes <strong>of</strong> lesser intensity originating within a radius <strong>of</strong> 450 km around<br />

Shillong and neighbouring regions. A list <strong>of</strong> important earthquakes from I.M.D.<br />

catalogue occurred in the region bounded by Lat. 25.00 to 30.00°N and Long. 86.00 to<br />

91.00°E for the period 1505 to 2001 is enclosed.<br />

The occurrence <strong>of</strong> earthquakes in Sikkim region is broadly associated with the<br />

tectonic activity along the well-known faults in the Himalayas such as the Main<br />

Boundary Thrust (MBT) and the Main Central Thrust (MCT). Besides, earthquakes<br />

occurring along some other faults namely Malda-Kishanganj Fault, Tista Fault, Purnia-<br />

Everest Lineament, Katihar-Nailphamani Fault, Dhubri Fault etc. have also affected the<br />

region.<br />

In the seismic zoning map <strong>of</strong> India prepared by a committee <strong>of</strong> experts under the<br />

auspices <strong>of</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> Indian Standards (BIS: 1893: Part I 2002), the entire area <strong>of</strong><br />

Sikkim has been placed in the zone IV. The seismic zone IV is broadly associated with<br />

a seismic intensity VIII on Modified Mercalli (MM) scale. It may be mentioned that the<br />

seismic intensity VIII corresponds to a horizontal ground acceleration range <strong>of</strong> 51-<br />

350cm/sec 2 or an average acceleration <strong>of</strong> 172cm/sec 2 in any direction. The ground<br />

acceleration and hence the intensity <strong>of</strong> an earthquake at a place depends on magnitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> earthquake, distance from the focus, duration <strong>of</strong> earthquake, type <strong>of</strong> underlying soil<br />

and its damping characteristics and liquefaction potential. The damage to the buildings


founded on sandy soil is higher than that in the similar type <strong>of</strong> buildings having their<br />

foundation on hard bedrock. Also, the damage will be higher for higher magnitude and<br />

long duration earthquakes, less epicentral distance s<strong>of</strong>t soil conditions and area with<br />

high liquefaction potential.<br />

Presently, there is no scientific technique available anywhere in the world to predict<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> earthquakes with reasonable degree <strong>of</strong> accuracy with regard to space,<br />

time and magnitude. It is, therefore suggested that appropriate steps may be taken to<br />

ensure that the dwellings and other structures in the region are designed and constructed<br />

as per guidelines laid down by Bureau <strong>of</strong> Indian Standards (BIS) to minimize the losses<br />

caused by earthquakes. Suitable seismic design parameters may be adopted as per<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> National Committee on Seismic Design Parameters (NCSDP)<br />

for designing and engineering Hydroelectric Projects.<br />

EXPLANATION OF COMPUTER OUTPUT (IMD CATALOGUE)<br />

1. “O” – Time means time <strong>of</strong> Origin <strong>of</strong> Earthquake in UTC.<br />

2. “Depth” means Focal Depth in Kilometers. If depth is reported as 33, it means<br />

that the earthquake is located in the crust but its focal depth could not be<br />

determined.<br />

3. “MAG” means magnitude on Richter scale.<br />

4. “Zero” under any column means that the parameters have not been determined.<br />

2


MODIFIED MERCALLI INTENSITY SCALE (ABRIDGED)<br />

CLASS OF REMARKS<br />

EARTHQUAKE<br />

I Not felt except by a very few under specially favourable circumstances.<br />

II Felt only by a few persons at rest, specially on upper floors <strong>of</strong> buildings; and<br />

delicately suspended objects may swing.<br />

III Felt quite noticeably indoors, specially on upper floors <strong>of</strong> buildings but many<br />

people do not recognize it as an earthquake; standing motor cars may rock<br />

slightly; and vibration may be felt like the passing <strong>of</strong> a truck.<br />

IV During the day felt indoors by many, outdoors by a few, at night some<br />

awakened; dishes, windows, doors disturbed; walls make creaking sound,<br />

sensation like heavy truck striking the building; and standing motor cars rocked<br />

noticeably.<br />

V Felt by nearly everyone; many awakened; some dishes, windows, etc. broken; a<br />

few instances <strong>of</strong> cracked plaster; unstable object overturned; disturbance <strong>of</strong><br />

trees; polls and other tall objects notices sometimes; and pendulum clocks may<br />

stop.<br />

VI Felt by all, many frightened and run outdoors; some heavy furniture moved; a<br />

few instances <strong>of</strong> fallen plaster or damaged chimneys and damaged slight.<br />

VII Everybody runs outdoors, damage negligible in buildings <strong>of</strong> good design and<br />

construction; slight to moderate in well built ordinary structures; considerable<br />

in poorly built or badly designed structures; and some chimneys broken, noticed<br />

by person driving motor cars.<br />

VIII Damage slight in specially design structures; considerable in ordinary but<br />

substantial buildings with partial collapse; very heavy in poorly build structures;<br />

panel walls thrown out <strong>of</strong> framed structured; falling <strong>of</strong> chimney, factory stacks,<br />

columns, monuments and walls; heavy furniture overturned, sand and mud<br />

ejected in small amounts; changes in well water; and disturbs person driving<br />

motor cars.<br />

IX Damage considerable in specially designed structures: well designed framed<br />

structures thrown out <strong>of</strong> plumb; very heavy in substantial buildings with partial<br />

collapse; buildings shifted <strong>of</strong>f foundations; ground cracked conspicuously; and<br />

underground pipes broken.<br />

3


X Some well built wooden structures destroyed; most masonry and framed<br />

structures with foundations destroyed; ground badly cracks; rails bent;<br />

landslides considerable from river banks and steep slopes; shifted sand and mud;<br />

and water splashed over banks.<br />

XI Few, if any, masonry structures remain standing; bridges destroyed; broad<br />

fissures in ground, underground pipelines completely out <strong>of</strong> services; earth<br />

slumps and landslips in s<strong>of</strong>t ground; and rails bent greatly.<br />

XII Total damage; waves seen on ground surfaces; lines <strong>of</strong> sight and levels distorted;<br />

and objects thrown upward<br />

4


LIST OF EARTHQUAKES FROM IMD CATALOGUE OCCURING BETWEEN LAT25 . 00 TO 30 . 00<br />

DEG. AND LONG 86 . 00 TO 91 . 00DEG. E FOR THE PERIOD 1505 TO 2001<br />

DATE<br />

O-TIME LAT LONG DEPTH MAG<br />

Y M D Hr Mn Sec Deg-N Deg-E Km<br />

1833 8 26 0 0 . 0 27 . 50 86 . 50 0 . 7 . 5<br />

1834 7 8 0 0 . 0 25 . 80 89 . 40 0 . 6 . 3<br />

1834 7 21 0 0 . 0 25 . 80 89 . 40 0 . 6 . 0<br />

1842 2 5 21 15 . 0 25 . 00 87 . 00 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1842 11 11 0 0 . 0 25 . 00 90 . 00 0 . 6 . 5<br />

1843 8 10 0 0 . 0 27 . 00 88 . 30 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1849 2 27 0 0 . 0 27 . 00 88 . 30 0 . 6 . 0<br />

1852 5 0 0 0 . 0 27 . 00 88 . 00 0 . 6 . 5<br />

1897 6 12 11 6 . 0 25 . 90 91 . 00 0 . 8 . 7<br />

1899 9 25 0 0 . 0 27 . 00 88 . 30 0 . 6 . 0<br />

1909 2 17 0 0 . 0 27 . 00 87 . 00 0 . 5 . 0<br />

1918 2 4 17 54 49 . 0 29 . 60 87 . 80 0 . 6 . 0<br />

1923 4 24 22 3 6 . 0 29 . 60 87 . 80 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1923 9 9 22 3 42 . 0 25 . 30 91 . 00 0 . 7 . 1<br />

1926 12 4 11 15 23 . 0 29 . 60 87 . 80 0 . 6 . 0<br />

1930 7 2 21 3 34 . 0 25 . 80 90 . 20 0 . 7 . 1<br />

1930 7 3 0 19 5 . 0 25 . 80 90. 20 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1930 7 4 18 54 44 . 0 25 . 80 90 . 20 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1930 7 4 21 34 . 0 25 . 80 90. 80 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1930 7 8 4 32 24 . 0 25 . 80 90 . 80 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1930 7 8 9 43 . 0 25 . 80 90. 80 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1930 7 13 14 0 12 . 0 25 . 80 90 . 80 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1932 3 24 16 8 44 . 0 25 . 80 90 . 20 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1932 3 25 4 29 32 . 0 30 . 00 89 . 20 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1933 3 6 13 5 38 . 0 25 . 70 90 . 50 0 . 5 . 8<br />

1934 1 15 8 43 25 . 0 26 . 60 86. 80 0 . 8 . 3<br />

1934 1 16 4 59 22 . 0 28 . 00 86 . 00 0 . 5 . 6<br />

1934 7 21 0 0 . 0 25 . 80 89 . 40 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1935 5 21 4 22 31 . 0 28 . 80 89 . 30 140 . 6 . 3<br />

1936 5 30 7 8 38 . 0 25 . 70 90 . 50 0 . 5 . 3<br />

1936 6 9 0 2 42 . 0 27 . 50 87 . 00 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1936 6 18 14 56 27 . 0 26 . 60 90 . 30 0 . 5 . 8<br />

1936 9 7 2 30 49 . 0 27 . 50 87 . 00 0 . 5 . 7<br />

1937 8 15 11 36 48 . 0 30 . 00 90 . 00 0 . 5 . 8<br />

1938 1 29 4 13 8 . 0 27 . 50 87 . 00 0 . 5 . 8<br />

1938 2 26 12 10 43 . 0 28 . 00 90 . 50 0 . 5 . 7<br />

1938 4 13 1 10 17 . 0 26 . 00 91 . 00 0 . 5 . 2<br />

1939 6 4 22 36 . 0 28 . 50 86 . 50 0 . 5 . 7<br />

5


1940 8 2 3 3 59 . 0 28 . 00 90 . 50 0 . 5 . 2<br />

1945 5 19 5 2 53 . 0 25 . 10 90 . 90 0 . 6 . 1<br />

1949 12 10 19 37 14 . 0 26 . 00 89 . 00 0 . 6 . 0<br />

1950 2 26 3 35 48 . 0 28 . 00 90 . 50 0 . 6 . 0<br />

1951 4 7 20 29 12 . 0 25 . 90 90 . 50 0 . 6 . 8<br />

1951. 5 28 15 59 19 . 0 29 . 00 87 . 00 0 . 6 . 0<br />

1952 3 6 9 11 23 . 0 29 . 60 90 . 80 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1952 11 19 10 23 28 . 0 29 . 80 86 . 60 0 . 6 . 0<br />

1955 3 27 14 38 43 . 0 29 . 90 90 . 20 0 . 6 . 3<br />

1958 11 23 20 15 48 . 0 28 . 79 86 . 94 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1959 6 10 4 25 15 . 0 30 . 00 91 . 00 0 . 5 . 7<br />

1960 7 29 10 42 44 . 6 26 . 90 90 . 30 11 . 6 . 5<br />

1960 8 21 3 29 4 . 9 27 . 00 88 . 50 29 . 5 . 5<br />

1961 9 29 22 36 30 . 0 28 . 00 87 . 00 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1961 12 25 11 19 10 . 0 27 . 00 90 . 00 0 . 5 . 5<br />

1963 2 22 1 32 30 . 0 27 . 20 87 . 10 0 . 5 . 2<br />

1964 2 1 11 28 19 . 2 27 . 30 87 . 78 33 . 4 . 8<br />

1964 3 27 23 3 41 . 1 27 . 13 89 . 36 29 . 5 . 0<br />

1964 4 13 3 19 57 . 3 27 . 52 90 . 17 1 . 5 . 2<br />

1964 8 30 2 35 7 . 3 27 . 36 88 . 21 21 . 5 . 1<br />

1964 11 9 16 12 51 . 9 29 . 53 86 . 04 33 . 5 . 0<br />

1965 1 12 13 32 24 . 1 27 . 40 87 . 84 23 . 5 . 8<br />

1965 1 12 13 55 18 . 1 27 . 31 87 . 68 18 . 5 . 2<br />

1967 3 2 11 47 13 . 0 28 . 70 86 . 38 20 . 4 . 8<br />

1968 8 18 14 18 58 . 0 26 . 42 90 . 62 22 . 5 . 1<br />

1968 10 28 17 48 30 . 1 27 . 57 86 . 03 37 . 4 . 9<br />

1969 11 5 20 25 13 . 7 27 . 66 90 . 24 13 . 5 . 0<br />

1970 7 25 1 35 26 . 0 25 . 72 88 . 58 32 . 5 . 1<br />

1971 10 24 8 59 6 . 3 28 . 30 87 . 19 57 . 4 . 8<br />

1971 10 31 15 54 48 . 2 26 . 18 90 . 65 33 . 4 . 7<br />

1971 12 4 8 38 . 2 27 . 92 87 . 95 29 . 5 . 2<br />

1972 8 21 14 4 34 . 2 27 . 33 88 . 01 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1972 11 6 10 56 13 . 5 26 . 88 88 . 43 59 . 4 . 4<br />

1973 3 22 1 6 57 . 4 28 . 12 87 . 15 33 . 5 . 0<br />

1973 8 1 14 5 15 . 5 29 . 59 89 . 17 63 . 4 . 9<br />

1974 3 24 14 16 1 . 1 27 . 66 86 . 00 0 . 5 . 4<br />

1974 3 24 16 17 35 . 3 27 . 63 86 . 01 3 . 4 . 7<br />

1975 1 23 1 37 42 . 6 27 . 44 88 . 37 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1975 2 6 6 39 48 . 7 27 . 95 87 . 67 63 . 4 . 7<br />

1975 4 24 1 35 51 . 2 27 . 44 87 . 04 26 . 4 . 9<br />

1975 6 24 15 38 28 . 1 27 . 74 87 . 50 33 . 4 . 8<br />

1975 11 21 13 49 27 . 9 26 . 96 86 . 54 0 . 4 . 9<br />

1975 11 26 15 2 31 . 1 28 . 15 87 . 80 33 . 5 . 0<br />

1976 9 14 6 43 51 . 6 29 . 81 89 . 57 75 . 5 . 4<br />

1977 6 5 19 21 37 . 4 26 . 07 88 . 43 0 . 4 . 7<br />

1978 10 14 18 48 48 . 9 27 . 66 87 . 33 0 . 4 . 8<br />

1978 10 23 14 36 50 . 4 28 . 56 86 . 78 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1979 4 2 1 16 46 . 5 26 . 46 90 . 68 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1979 4 11 16 8 12 . 6 25 . 98 88 . 84 33 . 4 . 7<br />

1979 6 19 16 29 8 . 4 26 . 74 87 . 48 1 . 5 . 2<br />

6


1979 10 17 1 44 22 . 2 27 . 97 87 . 62 33 . 4 . 6<br />

1979 11 16 19 17 27 . 4 27 . 95 88 . 69 39 . 4 . 6<br />

1980 6 11 5 25 15 . 4 25 . 79 90 . 31 68 . 4 . 9<br />

1980 11 19 19 0 44 . 5 27 . 40 88 . 80 1 . 6. 0<br />

1980 12 22 4 36 8 . 0 26 . 67 89 . 59 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1980 12 26 5 19 44 . 9 29 . 08 88 . 88 66 . 4 . 5<br />

1981 2 9 15 49 21 . 6 27 . 20 89 . 76 16 . 4 . 9<br />

1981 11 21 4 25 5 . 6 29 . 52 89 . 12 50 . 4 . 8<br />

1982 1 28 7 18 7 . 6 25 . 47 90 . 89 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1982 2 26 0 5 47 . 5 25 . 79 90 . 62 48 . 4 . 6<br />

1982 4 5 2 19 41 . 1 27 . 38 88 . 84 9 . 5 . 0<br />

1982 6 20 15 29 19 . 8 26 . 24 89 . 97 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1982 7 6 6 13 32 . 0 25 . 88 90 . 31 8 . 5 . 0<br />

1982 8 18 18 1 7 . 6 27 . 04 89 . 26 51 . 4 . 6<br />

1983 10 16 22 3 14 . 5 29 . 51 90 . 31 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1983 12 16 15 15 40 . 1 28 . 37 86 . 65 116 . 4 . 2<br />

1983 12 23 19 35 44 . 2 25 . 87 87 . 91 33 . 4 . 3<br />

1984 1 25 23 49 44 . 6 27 . 49 86 . 10 11 . 4 . 6<br />

1985 5 25 0 28 18 . 7 27 . 60 88 . 48 33 . 4 . 6<br />

1985 6 7 18 23 59 . 0 26 . 87 90 . 21 33 . 4 . 8<br />

1985 6 17 21 52 49 . 0 25 . 65 90 . 20 22 . 4 . 6<br />

1985 10 2 16 33 50 . 3 27 . 19 89 . 73 45 . 4 . 4<br />

1986 1 7 20 20 . 4 27 . 40 88 . 43 41 . 4 . 7<br />

1986 1 10 3 46 30 . 9 28 . 65 86 . 56 63 . 5 . 5<br />

1986 2 2 0 13 50 . 7 27 . 92 86 . 45 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1986 2 10 12 56 23 . 0 28 . 15 87 . 86 87 . 4 . 7<br />

1986 4 12 12 44 2 . 2 28 . 63 86 . 57 33 . 4 . 8<br />

1986 10 25 21 25 30 . 4 26 . 12 88 . 26 33 . . 0<br />

1986 12 1 19 14 29 . 0 28 . 30 87 . 80 10 . . 0<br />

1987 4 23 9 5 56 . 8 27 . 93 87 . 01 48 . 4 . 7<br />

1987 4 25 22 13 47 . 0 25 . 30 88 . 46 10 . . 0<br />

1987 5 10 5 10 42 . 3 28 . 99 87 . 26 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1987 6 22 23 6 53 . 5 28 . 40 87 . 17 33 . 4 . 1<br />

1987 9 25 23 16 29 . 0 29 . 84 90 . 37 19 . 5 . 1<br />

1987 9 26 1 3 3 . 0 29 . 82 90 . 45 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1987 9 29 17 30 28 . 3 29 . 91 90 . 41 33 . 4 . 6<br />

1987 9 29 21 12 30 . 0 29 . 70 90 . 41 46 . 4 . 5<br />

1987 10 6 22 18 17 . 2 29 . 90 90 . 42 10 . 4 . 7<br />

1987 10 22 21 23 56 . 0 27 . 07 89 . 06 19 . 4 . 2<br />

1987 11 25 19 20 40 . 0 27 . 70 86 . 17 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1987 12 6 23 29 44 . 0 27 . 00 88 . 52 42 . . 0<br />

1987 12 11 6 39 40 . 0 26 . 04 90 . 92 57 . 4 . 6<br />

1987 12 12 5 49 . 0 29 . 80 90 . 40 45 . 4 . 8<br />

1988 1 10 6 18 35 . 0 29 . 75 90 . 29 50 . 4 . 7<br />

1988 1 10 6 31 42 . 7 29 . 89 90 . 44 10 . 4 . 7<br />

1988 1 19 11 23 51 . 0 27 . 80 88 . 80 33 . 4 . 3<br />

1988 3 27 5 56 30 . 0 27 . 10 88 . 42 70 . 4 . 1<br />

1988 4 9 12 57 55 . 7 29 . 84 86 . 87 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1988 4 20 6 40 25 . 8 27 . 02 86 . 72 55 . 5 . 4<br />

1988 4 25 16 4 3 . 7 26 . 90 86 . 54 79 . 4 . 7<br />

7


1988 5 10 7 16 16 . 1 25 . 32 90 . 88 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1988 5 26 16 30 5 . 5 27 . 45 88 . 61 42 . 4 . 7<br />

1988 5 28 23 13 12 . 0 28 . 00 89 . 70 33 . . 0<br />

1988 8 20 23 9 10 . 1 26 . 72 86 . 63 65 . 6 . 4<br />

1988 8 20 23 38 56 . 0 26 . 90 86 . 70 38 . . 0<br />

1988 8 22 11 34 34 . 7 26 . 61 86 . 74 33 . 4 . 3<br />

1988 8 24 9 55 34 . 3 26 . 77 86 . 44 41 . 4 . 7<br />

1988 8 29 12 12 17 . 0 26 . 39 87 . 50 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1988 9 1 22 4 11 . 3 26 . 80 86 . 53 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1988 9 2 6 35 34 . 3 26 . 56 86 . 48 33 . 4 . 3<br />

1988 9 27 19 10 10 . 0 27 . 19 88 . 37 28 . 5 . 0<br />

1988 12 10 15 24 31 . 4 26 . 38 86 . 68 33 . . 0<br />

1988 12 13 6 29 17 . 3 27 . 14 87 . 97 52 . 4 . 4<br />

1988 12 24 13 32 22 . 0 26 . 90 88 . 00 41 . 4 . 4<br />

1988 12 27 2 56 1 . 8 27 . 98 87 . 86 38 . 4 . 6<br />

1989 2 12 23 44 57 . 0 30 . 00 89 . 86 53 . . 0<br />

1989 4 9 2 31 36 . 3 29 . 11 90 . 02 10 . 5 . 1<br />

1989 4 16 0 2 33 . 0 29 . 20 89 . 70 33 . . 0<br />

1989 5 10 23 20 34 . 0 27 . 70 87 . 20 33 . . 0<br />

1989 5 22 19 24 31 . 0 27 . 38 87 . 86 4 . 5 .0<br />

1989 6 11 13 42 45 . 7 26 . 39 90 . 70 50 . 4 . 5<br />

1989 7 30 21 4 44 . 0 30 . 00 90 . 50 33 . . 0<br />

1989 10 10 4 10 56 . 0 28 . 36 87 . 49 38 . 4 . 7<br />

1989 11 19 22 11 34 . 0 29 . 00 89 . 70 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1990 1 9 2 29 21 . 8 28 . 15 88 . 11 35 . 5 . 7<br />

1990 1 10 23 1 21 . 7 26 . 52 86 . 67 66 . 4 . 4<br />

1990 2 18 18 12 48 . 3 29 . 39 89 . 95 10 . 4 . 5<br />

1990 2 22 13 33 16 . 6 29 . 14 90 . 02 54 . 4 . 9<br />

1990 2 23 14 25 19 . 3 29 . 38 90 . 02 10 . 4 . 3<br />

1990 3 1 18 47 28 . 0 28 . 70 88 . 40 33 . 4 . 2<br />

1990 5 6 10 30 9 . 0 29 . 99 89 . 98 33 . 4 . 2<br />

1990 5 19 2 18 57 . 0 25 . 40 90 . 93 33 . . 0<br />

1990 7 13 11 50 11 . 0 28 . 20 86 . 90 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1990 10 29 12 6 28 . 0 27 . 60 89 . 10 33 . . 0<br />

1991 1 5 14 50 8 . 0 28 . 90 87 . 92 33 . . 0<br />

1991 3 4 0 55 38 . 0 28 . 10 89 . 20 33 . . 0<br />

1991 3 15 4 28 18 . 2 28 . 34 87 . 55 64 . 4 . 7<br />

1991 6 8 18 59 57 . 8 26 . 30 90 . 37 33 . 4 . 0<br />

1991 8 7 11 36 29 . 1 25 . 27 88 . 66 10 . 4 . 7<br />

1991 8 19 22 28 41 . 0 26 . 80 90 . 70 10 . . 0<br />

1991 9 25 19 26 49 . 3 26 . 70 88 . 40 33 . . 0<br />

1991 9 27 11 56 40 . 8 29 . 90 90 . 40 33 . . 0<br />

1991 10 30 13 13 57 . 0 26 . 00 88 . 60 33 . . 0<br />

1991 12 21 19 52 45 . 1 27 . 79 87 . 96 65 . 4 . 7<br />

1992 3 7 22 41 50 . 8 29 . 40 89 . 40 113 . 4 . 3<br />

1992 4 1 13 41 3 . 9 27 . 40 87 . 10 33 . 4 . 3<br />

1992 4 4 17 43 20 . 7 28 . 10 88 . 00 33 . 4 . 9<br />

1992 4 20 19 22 59 . 7 25 . 80 90 . 60 55 . 4 . 2<br />

1992 7 24 6 24 17 . 6 29 . 30 90 . 20 33 . 4 . 8<br />

1992 7 30 8 24 46 . 6 29 .60 90 . 20 14 . 5 . 9<br />

8


1992 7 30 9 7 39 . 1 29 . 90 90 . 30 33 . 4 . 2<br />

1992 7 30 13 36 42 . 0 29 . 80 90 . 30 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1992 7 30 17 28 53 . 9 30 . 00 90 . 40 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1992 7 30 19 6 13 . 3 29 . 80 90 . 20 33 . 4 . 3<br />

1992 8 4 22 50 3 . 0 29 . 90 90 . 40 10 . 4 . 2<br />

1992 8 8 19 50 42 . 6 29 . 90 90 . 30 33 . 4 . 3<br />

1992 8 9 22 34 46 . 4 28 . 70 86 . 50 37 . 4 . 3<br />

1993 2 15 14 29 40 . 8 25 . 90 87 . 50 30 . 5 . 0<br />

1993 3 3 5 17 31 . 0 25 . 40 90 . 20 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1993 3 20 14 51 59 . 7 29 . 10 87 . 30 12 . 5 . 8<br />

1993 3 20 21 26 39 . 4 29 . 00 87 . 40 21 . 5 . 0<br />

1993 3 31 13 44 10 . 1 29 . 10 87 . 30 20 . 5 . 1<br />

1993 7 3 2 0 22 . 2 28 . 30 86 . 60 33 . 4 . 7<br />

1993 7 9 16 23 17 . 3 26 . 80 86 . 00 33 . 4 . 6<br />

1993 9 5 6 5 54 . 6 27 . 20 87 . 30 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1993 12 14 2 27 44 . 4 28 . 40 86 . 80 33 . 4 . 8<br />

1993 12 14 2 27 44 . 4 28 . 40 86 . 80 33 . 4 . 8<br />

1994 1 16 14 22 38 . 3 26 . 40 89 . 10 33 . 3 . 9<br />

1994 4 15 14 28 48 . 7 25 . 90 90 . 50 33 . 4 . 2<br />

1994 5 25 7 38 53 . 7 26 . 60 87 . 80 48 . 4 . 6<br />

1995 1 1 19 36 13 . 6 27 . 80 87 . 60 33 . 4 . 9<br />

1995 1 12 23 39 51 . 0 29 . 40 88 . 20 33 . 4 . 9<br />

1995 8 8 16 52 48 . 8 26 . 40 90 . 40 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1995 12 6 0 50 33 . 0 25 . 20 91 . 00 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1995 12 11 9 49 36 . 0 27 . 60 87 . 50 33 . 4 . 0<br />

1996 1 25 7 15 19 . 3 28 . 00 87 . 00 33 . 5 . 2<br />

1996 1 25 7 15 13 . 0 28 . 40 86 . 90 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1996 3 23 16 7 34 . 2 27 . 20 88 . 30 33 . 4 . 0<br />

1996 4 26 16 31 3 . 0 27 . 80 87 . 60 33 . 5 . 2<br />

1996 5 10 9 7 1 . 8 30 . 00 88 . 10 0 . 4 . 8<br />

1996 5 11 3 58 50 . 2 29 . 90 88 . 10 0 . 4 . 8<br />

1996 5 11 7 27 11 . 2 29 . 90 88 . 10 0 . 4 . 3<br />

1996 5 14 5 41 8 . 9 29 . 70 87 . 90 0 . 4 . 1<br />

1996 7 3 7 0 28 . 9 29 . 90 88 . 10 0 . 4 . 1<br />

1996 7 3 10 10 33 . 8 29 . 90 88 . 20 0 . 5 . 0<br />

1996 7 3 10 19 42 . 9 30 .00 88 . 20 0 . 4 . 3<br />

1996 7 3 10 49 50 . 5 29 . 90 87 . 80 0 . 4 . 1<br />

1996 7 4 18 11 4 . 6 30 . 00 88 . 10 0 . 4 . 9<br />

1996 7 6 8 12 39 . 4 29 . 90 87 . 90 0 . 3 . 8<br />

1996 7 13 8 29 4 . 0 29 . 90 88 . 10 0 . 4 . 3<br />

1996 7 22 15 54 7 . 0 30 . 00 88 . 00 0 . 4 . 5<br />

1996 8 3 7 12 6 . 0 30 . 00 88 . 20 0 . 4 . 1<br />

1996 8 18 2 48 . 0 25 . 80 90 . 10 0 . 4 . 4<br />

1996 9 13 3 41 8 . 6 27 . 00 88 . 20 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1996 9 25 17 41 17 . 2 27 . 40 88 . 50 33 . 5 . 0<br />

1996 10 3 1 29 3 . 1 28 . 20 87 . 50 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1996 10 14 14 49 12 . 7 29 . 90 88 . 20 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1996 12 30 11 8 18 . 9 27 . 43 86 . 63 37 . 5 . 0<br />

1996 12 30 15 16 29 . 5 27 . 23 86 . 50 33 . 3 . 6<br />

1997 1 22 11 12 4 . 4 25 . 60 90 . 30 33 . . 0<br />

9


1997 1 25 20 8 28 . 7 30 . 00 88 . 00 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1997 3 3 9 29 40 . 0 27 . 24 86 . 00 45 . 4 . 7<br />

1997 3 22 21 16 4 . 8 29 . 89 88 . 15 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1997 4 4 10 8 41 . 0 25 . 50 90 . 80 33 . 3 . 8<br />

1997 4 7 13 0 42 . 0 27 . 40 86 . 50 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1997 5 26 0 45 32 . 1 27 . 70 86 . 90 33 . . 0<br />

1997 7 5 6 22 53 . 5 28 . 80 86 . 86 33 . 4 . 8<br />

1997 7 8 21 16 49 . 8 29 . 83 88 . 31 33 . 3 . 7<br />

1997 7 9 7 18 52 . 9 29 . 90 88 . 40 33 . 4 . 1<br />

1997 7 12 23 41 9 . 7 29 . 90 88 . 40 33 . . 0<br />

1997 8 10 11 53 17 . 2 29 . 16 89 . 49 33 . 3 . 4<br />

1997 8 17 20 3 32 . 8 28 . 13 87 . 56 33 . . 0<br />

1997 9 18 7 37 10 . 0 28 . 87 86 . 15 33 . 4 . 6<br />

1997 10 11 10 11 10 . 3 27 . 70 86 . 40 33 . 4 . 3<br />

1997 10 12 19 45 25 . 8 30 . 00 88 . 00 33 . . 0<br />

1997 10 30 2 2 52 . 0 29 . 50 89 . 70 33 . 5 . 3<br />

1997 10 30 20 3 . 0 29 . 20 89 . 40 0. 4 . 9<br />

1997 11 14 12 30 23 . 9 25 . 30 87 . 70 33 . . 0<br />

1997 11 27 16 11 57 . 0 27 . 60 87 . 34 33 . 5 . 1<br />

1997 11 27 16 55 52 . 1 27 . 70 87 . 76 33 . 4 . 2<br />

1997 12 8 2 3 55 . 8 27 . 48 87 . 17 33 . 5 . 0<br />

1997 12 8 6 37 57 . 8 27 . 48 87 . 16 33 . . 0<br />

1998 1 16 18 6 42 . 5 30 . 00 86 . 00 33 . 4 . 0<br />

1998 2 1 17 32 48 . 2 28 . 10 87 . 10 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1998 2 12 2 40 29 . 1 26 . 50 88 . 10 33 . 4 . 6<br />

1998 2 28 4 59 30 . 7 27 . 00 87 . 50 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1998 3 15 20 35 29 . 3 28 . 55 86 . 88 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1998 3 16 10 35 2 . 0 26 . 90 89 . 68 33 . 3 . 8<br />

1998 3 18 18 12 18 . 9 27 . 36 88 . 33 33 . 4 . 0<br />

1998 5 13 1 24 55 . 6 28 . 18 89 . 80 10 . 4 . 9<br />

1998 7 31 17 50 18 . 3 28 . 01 87 . 73 33 . 4 . 1<br />

1998 8 18 4 10 20 . 6 27 . 55 90 . 98 22 . 5 . 2<br />

1998 8 24 7 32 21 . 5 30 . 00 87 . 92 33 . . 0<br />

1998 8 25 9 43 6 . 0 29 . 99 88 . 09 33 . 4 . 1<br />

1998 8 25 9 56 44 . 0 29 . 83 87 . 91 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1998 8 25 10 25 6 . 0 29 . 98 88 . 10 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1998 8 25 12 43 4 . 3 29 . 96 88 . 09 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1998 8 25 13 39 49 . 5 29 . 92 88 . 12 33 . 3 . 8<br />

1998 8 25 15 16 2 . 7 29 . 97 88 . 10 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1998 8 30 3 49 48 . 1 29 . 90 87 . 98 33 . 4 . 0<br />

1998 9 3 18 15 56 . 5 27 . 85 86 . 94 33 . 5 . 6<br />

1998 9 3 18 22 19 . 2 27 . 97 87 . 04 33 . . 0<br />

1998 9 3 18 51 38 . 6 27 . 65 86 . 80 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1998 9 3 21 0 53 . 5 27 . 72 86 . 88 33 . 4 . 1<br />

1998 9 3 23 2 28 . 3 27 . 60 86 . 73 33 . 4 . 6<br />

1998 9 4 0 36 17 . 9 27 . 45 86 . 46 33 . 4 . 1<br />

1998 9 4 1 10 18 . 4 27 . 77 86 . 79 33 . 4 . 2<br />

1998 9 4 21 16 13 . 7 27 . 65 86 . 72 33 . . 0<br />

1998 9 6 21 35 49 . 4 27 . 86 86 . 89 33 . 4 . 6<br />

1998 9 10 22 57 16 . 9 27 . 20 88 . 34 33 . 4 . 7<br />

10


1998 9 12 5 8 52 . 1 27 . 85 86 . 90 33 . 4 . 2<br />

1998 9 21 23 24 40 . 6 29 . 94 88 . 00 33 . 4 . 1<br />

1998 9 26 20 48 44 . 1 27 . 52 86 . 13 33 . 3 . 9<br />

1998 9 30 2 29 55 . 1 29 . 94 88 . 11 33 . 5 . 1<br />

1998 10 11 22 0 49 . 9 26 . 35 86 . 40 90 . 4 . 4<br />

1998 10 13 14 47 51 . 9 29 . 74 87 . 88 33 . . 0<br />

1998 10 16 14 17 16 . 7 30 . 00 88 . 19 33 . . 0<br />

1998 11 26 10 14 27 . 6 27 . 75 87 . 89 73 . 5 . 1<br />

1998 12 1 5 35 9 . 2 27 . 93 87 . 64 33 . 4 . 8<br />

1999 1 28 16 10 33 . 9 28 . 22 87 . 31 41 . 4 . 0<br />

1999 3 25 5 4 54 . 3 28 . 51 88 . 28 33 . 3 . 8<br />

1999 3 25 20 47 57 . 4 28 . 50 87 . 63 13 . 4 . 2<br />

1999 3 31 22 32 57 . 8 28 . 57 86 . 81 21 . . 0<br />

1999 4 10 20 42 39 . 7 28 . 04 87 . 85 33 . 4 . 2<br />

1999 5 7 17 53 52 . 3 27 . 22 90 . 64 33 . . 0<br />

1999 5 9 8 8 57 . 7 27 . 40 89 . 45 15 . . 0<br />

1999 6 13 7 38 6 . 4 28 . 14 86 . 64 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1999 7 4 6 5 15 . 2 25 . 42 90 . 28 33 . 3 . 8<br />

1999 8 1 8 24 51 . 2 28 . 37 86 . 79 40 . 5. 0<br />

1999 9 5 2 28 22 . 8 28 . 07 87 . 53 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1999 9 8 18 8 27 . 9 27 . 90 87 . 91 19 . 3 . 7<br />

1999 9 16 12 20 9 . 8 27 . 55 87 . 71 33 . . 0<br />

1999 9 20 7 28 5 . 6 27 . 24 87 . 98 23 . 4 . 1<br />

1999 9 21 13 54 39 . 8 25 . 16 88 . 86 2 . 3 . 9<br />

1999 10 15 7 33 1 . 0 29 . 61 90 . 06 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1999 10 18 16 12 55 . 7 26 . 68 87 . 22 33 . . 0<br />

1999 11 5 15 57 21 . 4 28 . 59 87 . 08 23 . 3 . 7<br />

1999 11 17 5 27 14 . 0 28 . 09 89 . 18 33 . 3 . 6<br />

1999 1 28 16 10 33 . 9 28 . 22 87 . 31 41 . 4 . 0<br />

1999 3 25 5 4 54 . 3 28 . 51 88 . 28 33 . 3 . 8<br />

1999 3 25 20 47 57 . 4 28 . 50 87 . 63 12 . 4 . 2<br />

1999 4 10 20 42 39 . 7 28 . 04 87 . 85 33 . 4 . 2<br />

1999 6 13 7 38 6 . 4 28 . 14 86 . 64 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1999 7 4 6 5 15 . 2 25 . 42 90 . 28 33 . 3 . 8<br />

1999 8 1 8 24 51 . 2 28 . 37 86 . 79 40 . 5 . 0<br />

1999 9 5 2 28 22 . 8 28 . 07 87 . 53 33 . 4 . 5<br />

1999 9 8 18 8 27 . 9 27 . 90 87 . 91 19 . 3 . 7<br />

1999 9 20 7 28 5 . 6 27 . 24 87 . 98 22 . 4 . 2<br />

1999 9 21 13 54 39 . 8 25 . 16 88 . 86 2 . 3 . 9<br />

1999 10 15 7 33 1 . 0 29 . 61 90 . 06 33 . 4 . 4<br />

1999 11 5 15 57 21 . 4 28 . 59 87 . 08 23 . 3 . 7<br />

1999 11 7 5 11 57 . 6 27 . 10 89 . 13 14 . 3 . 8<br />

1999 11 17 5 27 13 . 8 28 . 04 89 . 22 33 . 3 . 3<br />

2000 1 20 12 54 27 . 5 27 . 78 86 . 02 33 . 5 . 0<br />

2000 1 25 12 7 33 . 3 29 . 94 89 . 72 0 . 5 . 0<br />

2000 2 21 18 21 43 . 2 28 . 36 86 . 56 33 . 4 . 7<br />

2000 3 13 20 44 38 . 3 27 . 43 87 . 85 108 . 4 . 1<br />

2000 4 18 7 53 45 . 2 26 . 55 90 . 26 33 . 3 . 3<br />

2000 6 20 7 16 43 . 8 26 . 04 90 . 31 33 . 4 . 3<br />

2000 9 6 7 19 8 . 9 28 . 52 86 . 86 33 . 4 . 2<br />

11


2000 10 3 17 8 22 . 4 26 . 88 89 . 8 33 . 2 . 8<br />

2001 1 16 8 6 57 . 4 26 . 42 90 . 24 33 . . 0<br />

2001 2 9 10 20 55 . 7 27 . 24 89 . 67 13 . 3 . 9<br />

2001 2 27 1 46 7 . 0 26 . 48 90 . 55 20 . 4 . 7<br />

2001 2 27 16 21 25 . 6 28 . 38 86 . 97 33 . 4 . 9<br />

2001 4 3 23 8 38 . 0 27 . 74 86 . 13 33 . 4 . 6<br />

2001 4 3 23 26 4 . 4 27 . 82 86 . 18 18 . 3 . 5<br />

2001 4 8 18 35 49 . 3 28 . 16 88 . 57 20 . 3 . 9<br />

2001 4 20 18 35 2 . 7 26 . 13 90 . 67 33 . 4 . 6<br />

2001 4 28 10 37 59 . 1 28 . 55 87 . 14 33 . 5 . 0<br />

2001 4 29 10 39 9 . 1 28 . 70 87 . 14 33 . 4 . 5<br />

2001 5 3 16 2 59 . 6 27 . 63 90 . 47 33 . 3 . 8<br />

2001 5 21 21 55 7 . 8 28 . 54 86 . 72 33 . 3 . 8<br />

2001 6 12 10 47 46 . 6 28 . 46 86 . 57 20 . 3 . 9<br />

2001 7 3 19 16 18 . 4 26 . 15 89 . 20 6 . 3 . 6<br />

2001 7 6 23 4 3 . 4 27 . 65 88 . 64 10 . 2 . 7<br />

2001 8 6 6 23 32 . 7 27 . 47 87 . 47 9 . 4 . 3<br />

2001 9 4 22 8 3 . 7 25 . 37 90 . 96 15 . 3 . 7<br />

2001 9 27 22 40 11 . 1 26 . 99 87 . 76 2 . 4 . 1<br />

2001 12 2 22 41 14 . 8 27 . 18 88 . 33 15 . 4 . 8<br />

NO. OF EARTHQUAKES = 358<br />

12


PRELIMINARY RANKING STUDY REPORT- BY CEA<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> Hydro Electric Scheme (Org. No. HEPR-PS-BHM-784)<br />

Annexure 6.1<br />

The <strong>Ringpi</strong> Chhu is one <strong>of</strong> the sub-tributaries <strong>of</strong> Talung Chhu and intercepts as substantial<br />

catchment area. It if formed by two streams originating at high elevations having snow<br />

catchment in their upper reaches. The river has substantial flows and has steep gradient. A<br />

scheme can be developed involving construction <strong>of</strong> a diversion structure immediately<br />

downstream <strong>of</strong> confluence <strong>of</strong> the two at a site where the river bed level is +2950 m., a<br />

tunnel about 7 Km. in length and a power house with a tailrace level <strong>of</strong> + 1800 m. The<br />

scheme would utilize a gross head <strong>of</strong> 1150 m. enabling a firm power output <strong>of</strong> about 20<br />

MW. With an optimum generating capacity <strong>of</strong> 160 MW, the scheme would enable annual<br />

energy generation <strong>of</strong> 716 GWH and 780 GWH respectively in 90% and 50% dependable<br />

years.


1<br />

Annexure 6.2<br />

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSION OF MEETING TAKEN BY<br />

CHIEF ENGINEER (HP&I), CEA WITH NHPC OFFICERS ON<br />

18.12.2003 REGARDING PFRS OF RINGPI HE PROJECT IN SIKKIM<br />

(Letter No. 7/9/NHPC/2003/HP&I/1572 dated 22.12.03)<br />

Conceptual planning <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> hydroelectric project in Sikkim was discussed<br />

with <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> NHPC on 18.12.2003. Subsquently necessary<br />

information/drawing were submitted on 19.12.2003. As per reassessment<br />

studies carried out in CEA (based on desk studies) <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project envisaged<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> a diversion structure, 7 km. long head race tunnel and a power<br />

house with installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 160 MW. The river bed level at diversion site<br />

was +2950 m. and tail water level was +1800 m. NHPC <strong>of</strong>ficers indicated that<br />

there was some discrepancy in the level indicated in CEA studies <strong>of</strong> diversion<br />

structure. Actual river bed level at diversion site would +2940 m. NHPC has<br />

proposed the tail water level <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ringpi</strong> scheme as +1850 m. which<br />

corresponds to FRL <strong>of</strong> proposed Lingza HE scheme for which PFR is being<br />

prepared. It was pointed out that in the proposed <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE scheme, due to high<br />

head available, pelton type <strong>of</strong> turbine would be installed. Accordingly,<br />

difference between tail water level <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE project and FRL <strong>of</strong> Lingza HE<br />

project should be around +3 m. NHPC has been advised to proceed with the<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> PFR <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE scheme keeping in view the above suggestion.<br />

NHPC however, may discuss various alternatives considered by them in PFR.


TITLE<br />

ANNEXURES 6.3<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> Discussions on <strong>Power</strong> Potential<br />

studies<br />

Preliminary Feasibility Report<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project (2 x 35MW)<br />

No.<br />

1-2<br />

Reply on CWC’s Comments on Hydrology 3-6<br />

Reply on Comments <strong>of</strong> SP&PA Division CEA 7-8<br />

Reply on comments on CMDD(E&NE), CWC 9


1<br />

Annexure 6.3<br />

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF MEETING TAKEN BY<br />

DIRECTOR (HP&I), CEA WITH NHPC ON 24.12.2003 REGARDING<br />

POWER POTENTIAL STUDIES OF PFRS OF RINGPI &<br />

RANGYONG HE PROJECTS IN SIKKIM.<br />

(Letter No. 7/9/2003/HP&I/1581-1582 dated 24.12.2003)<br />

<strong>Power</strong> potential studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> & Rangyong H.E. Projects in Sikkim were<br />

discussed in detail and summarized as under :<br />

1 <strong>Ringpi</strong> HE Project :<br />

i. Only power potential studies without any write up was presented by<br />

NHPC <strong>of</strong>ficers and the same was discussed.<br />

ii. Hydrology may be got cleared by CWC.<br />

iii. NHPC have furnished studies considering FRL at +2940 m. and tail<br />

water level <strong>of</strong> +1853 m. (+3 m. above the FRL <strong>of</strong> proposed Lingza HE<br />

Project). NHPC Officers indicated that sufficient pondage is<br />

available for peaking operation. NHPC was advised to furnish basis <strong>of</strong><br />

FRL, MDDL and tail water level in the concerned chapter <strong>of</strong> PFR.<br />

iv. Based on the studies presented by NHPC an installed capacity <strong>of</strong> 70<br />

MW was considered to be in order subject to approval <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrology by CWC. It was suggested that two units <strong>of</strong> 35 MW each<br />

could be installed in case there is no problem <strong>of</strong> transportation.<br />

v. NHPC may prepare summary <strong>of</strong> the studies indicating yearly inflow,<br />

annual energy generation, load factor <strong>of</strong> operation during monsoon and<br />

lean flow period.<br />

vi. NHPC may indicate recommendation for further studies at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

FR/DPR.<br />

2. Rangyong HE Project :<br />

i. Only power potential studies without any write up was presented by<br />

NHPC <strong>of</strong>ficers and the same was discussed.<br />

ii. Hydrology may be got cleared by CWC.


iii. NHPC was advised to keep the tail water level <strong>of</strong> the project about 3 m.<br />

above FRL <strong>of</strong> the downstream project. NHPC Officers indicated that<br />

sufficient pondage is available for peaking operation. NHPC was<br />

advised to furnish basis <strong>of</strong> FRL, MDDL and tail water level in the<br />

concerned chapter <strong>of</strong> PFR.<br />

iv. NHPC has proposed an installation <strong>of</strong> 150 MW. The power potential<br />

studies presented by NHPC are generally in order subject to<br />

compliance <strong>of</strong> the above comment and approval <strong>of</strong> hydrology by<br />

CWC.<br />

v. NHPC may prepare summary <strong>of</strong> the studies indicating yearly inflow,<br />

annual energy generation, load factor <strong>of</strong> operation during monsoon and<br />

lean flow period.<br />

vi. NHPC may indicate recommendation for further studies at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

FR/DPR.<br />

2


REPLY ON CWC’s COMMENTS ON HYDROLOGY OF<br />

RINGPI HE PROJECT<br />

In reference to letter no. 7/9/(NHPC)/2003/HPI/1500 dt. 20-1-2004, point wise reply to the<br />

CWC observations are placed as below:<br />

Data<br />

availability<br />

Consistency <strong>of</strong><br />

data<br />

Water<br />

availability<br />

studies<br />

CWC Observations Reply <strong>of</strong> NHPC<br />

Rainfall - The report has quoted the<br />

paper <strong>of</strong> Sh. Biswas and Bhadram in<br />

which data <strong>of</strong> 42 raingauge stations, 24<br />

<strong>of</strong> which is equipped with SRRG have<br />

been stated to be available. However<br />

rainfall data has not been furnished in<br />

the report and only the period <strong>of</strong> data<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> 11 raingauge stations<br />

located u/s <strong>of</strong> the Teesta-V HEP is given<br />

in the report.<br />

(i) Though the rainfall data <strong>of</strong> 11<br />

raingauge stations available with NHPC<br />

could not be utilized in the study due to<br />

the reason that none <strong>of</strong> the stations are<br />

within the project catchment, the project<br />

authorities may put in their effort to verify<br />

whether any <strong>of</strong> the remaining stations as<br />

mentioned in the report lies in the project<br />

catchment and to explore the<br />

possibilities <strong>of</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> the data in<br />

the study.<br />

(ii) A complete list <strong>of</strong> all rainfall and<br />

discharge stations <strong>of</strong> Teesta Basin may<br />

be furnished.<br />

(i) Only graphical presentation<br />

comparing the avg. 10-daily discharges<br />

<strong>of</strong> the four methodologies has been<br />

furnished in the report. The data and the<br />

3<br />

As explained in earlier meetings and<br />

correspondences, the paper <strong>of</strong> Biswas and<br />

Bhadram has been quoted in the report to<br />

explain the precipitation characteristics. At<br />

present, NHPC has rainfall data <strong>of</strong> only the<br />

11 raingauge stations whose data availability<br />

status is shown in the report. As desired, the<br />

annual rainfall at these 11 stations for the<br />

available period is enclosed as Annexure-I.<br />

(i) None <strong>of</strong> the raingauge stations out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

remaining 31 raingauges as mentioned in the<br />

report <strong>of</strong> C.V.V Bhadram are located in the<br />

sub-basin under consideration.<br />

(ii) The list <strong>of</strong> rainfall and discharge stations<br />

lying upto the catchment <strong>of</strong> Teesta-V has<br />

already been shown in the data availability<br />

status given in report. Rainfall and discharge<br />

stations lying in the entire Teesta basin are<br />

<strong>of</strong> not relevant for the present projects.<br />

The available average 10-daily series at<br />

Lachen has already been sent along with the<br />

replies <strong>of</strong> Rukel and Rangyong projects.<br />

Tolung Chu data has not been used as the


analysis <strong>of</strong> Lachen adopted for the<br />

project has not been furnished without<br />

which checking is not possible. In the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> site-specific data, the use <strong>of</strong><br />

Tolung Chu data would be more reliable.<br />

The snowfed area covers a major portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the project catchment and without<br />

establishing hydro-meteorological<br />

similarity transfer <strong>of</strong> data from other sub-<br />

basin would be unjustified. Before<br />

discarding Tolung Chu data the project<br />

authorities are advised to verify whether<br />

any <strong>of</strong> the remaining 31 rain gauges are<br />

located in the sub-basin and to utilize the<br />

same after applying consistency checks<br />

and results incorporated. Rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

factor based on Tolung Chu data may be<br />

evaluated before discarding the data.<br />

The results obtained may be compared<br />

with the series obtained from Lachen<br />

before recommending the yield series.<br />

Efforts may be made to collect site<br />

specific data and water availability<br />

studies may be reviewed based on<br />

observed data.<br />

(ii) The basis <strong>of</strong> deriving the catchment<br />

reduction factor is not given.<br />

(iii) A series <strong>of</strong> projects is being planned<br />

in Teesta Basin and Integrated studies<br />

on water availability need to be done<br />

4<br />

series obtained using this data was on a<br />

much higher side as compared to other three<br />

series and no consistency checks could be<br />

applied to check the reliability <strong>of</strong> the data.<br />

Hence for the time being Lachen G&D data<br />

has been used.<br />

It has been verified that none <strong>of</strong> the<br />

raingauge stations out <strong>of</strong> the remaining 31<br />

raingauges as mentioned in the report <strong>of</strong><br />

C.V.V Bhadram are located in the sub-basin<br />

under consideration.<br />

(ii) The catchment reduction factor has been<br />

obtained on the basis <strong>of</strong> rainfed area at both<br />

the sites. Rainfed catchment <strong>of</strong> Lachen site<br />

is 574 Sq.km and <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ringpi</strong> is 63 Sq.km.<br />

Using these areas the catchment reduction<br />

factor comes out to be 0.11 and this factor<br />

has been used for converting the Lachen<br />

series to proposed dam site. The factor 0.22<br />

has been wrongly mentioned in the report<br />

and is a typing error.<br />

(iii) Cascade development need to be done<br />

at a later stage.


incorporating the likely releases from the<br />

u/s power house and independent<br />

catchment contributions.<br />

Design Flood (i) The design flood studies done by<br />

NHPC are too empirical to be relied upon<br />

even for PFR. The project authorities<br />

may also calculate the PMF value using<br />

SUH approach as suggested in North<br />

Brahmaputra Basin (Sub Zone-2(a)<br />

report published by CWC by obtaining<br />

the PMP/SPS value and temporal<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall from IMD and<br />

following 2 bell per day approach and<br />

incorporate this value also in the<br />

comparative study to get a more realistic<br />

value.<br />

(ii) Short interval data may be collected<br />

and the design flood should be reviewed<br />

based on observed data.<br />

Sedimentation The sedimentation rate for the region is<br />

about 0.1765 Ham/Sq.km/year as per<br />

CWC studies published in the<br />

Compendium on Silting <strong>of</strong> Reservoirs In<br />

India which is higher than the rate<br />

proposed for the project. As stated in the<br />

report more detail study is required. Data<br />

may also be collected from the<br />

completed projects <strong>of</strong> the basin.<br />

As per the terms <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> PFRs<br />

and as emphasized in the meetings<br />

conducted by CEA sedimentation studies<br />

are required to be carried out and<br />

incorporated in the PFRs.<br />

General The PFR must bring out the limitations <strong>of</strong><br />

the hydrological studies carried out for<br />

the PFR and suggest improvements,<br />

specific recommendations for opening<br />

5<br />

(i) As already explained in our earlier replies<br />

also, for such detailed studies as suggested<br />

for this stage i.e PFR, neither the database is<br />

at all sufficient nor necessity felt by us.<br />

During feasibility stage, deterministic/<br />

probabilistic approach will be used, based on<br />

more observed data.<br />

(ii) It is not felt necessary to perform such<br />

detailed study during PFR stage.<br />

We are aware <strong>of</strong> the findings <strong>of</strong> CWC studies<br />

published in the Compendium on silting <strong>of</strong><br />

reservoirs in India. As per that report, the<br />

sediment rate varies from 0.05658 to 0.2785<br />

Ham/Sq.km/year for Indus, Ganga and<br />

Brahmaputra basin. But the silt rate adopted<br />

for this particular project has been calculated<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> observed sediment data at<br />

Dikchu and is more region specific than that<br />

given in “Compendium on silting <strong>of</strong> reservoirs<br />

in India”.<br />

The necessity <strong>of</strong> detailed sedimentation<br />

study showing the new zero elevation,<br />

revised area capacity curve etc. is not felt<br />

during PFR stage.<br />

The PFR has pointed out the limitation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

studies after each study and establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

G&D site, rainfall stations etc. are also<br />

highlighted in the PFR.


new hydrological stations, method <strong>of</strong><br />

observations, data to be collected etc.<br />

may be given which will help us as<br />

guidance to the agency taking up the<br />

detail investigations/DPR must review<br />

the network in consultation with HSO,<br />

CWC.<br />

The hydrological studies for the PFR<br />

may be revised incorporating the above<br />

observations.<br />

6<br />

Moreover, all the CWC comments along with<br />

their replies are also being appended in the<br />

PFR’s for future reference.


REPLY ON COMMENTS OF SP&PA DIVISION ON DRAFT<br />

PFR OF RINGPI HE PROJECT<br />

(CEA Letter No.7/9/(NHPC)/2003/HP&I/111 dated 20.01.2004 )<br />

Sr.No. Comments Reply<br />

6.1<br />

General<br />

6.2<br />

6.3<br />

<strong>Ringpi</strong> HEP is a run <strong>of</strong> the river typr<br />

hydro project situated in the Dzongu<br />

area <strong>of</strong> North district <strong>of</strong> Sikkim. The<br />

project envisages construction <strong>of</strong> 40m<br />

high concrete dam, a 7km long head<br />

race tunnel and an underground power<br />

house.<br />

Construction <strong>Power</strong><br />

The construction power for the project<br />

shall be available through about 20km<br />

transmission line from Teesta-III,IV<br />

and V under construction project.<br />

Switchyard<br />

No details are given.<br />

6.4 <strong>Power</strong> Evacuation:<br />

<strong>Power</strong> will be generated at 11KV and<br />

stepped up to 220KV through 7no<br />

11/220KV 15MVA single phase<br />

transformers. The power generated<br />

from this project would be evacuated<br />

through 220KV double circuit line to<br />

a pooling station proposed near<br />

Teesta-II HEP to feed in to the grid<br />

which in turn is connected to national<br />

grid, which is in order.<br />

7<br />

It is general description <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project and no reply is required.<br />

This is already discussed in Chapter<br />

–X <strong>of</strong> the PFR<br />

5 nos. <strong>of</strong> bays have been taken at<br />

switchyard which have been<br />

indicated in the cost estimate based<br />

on the tentative scheme envisaged at<br />

this stage. However, 6 nos <strong>of</strong> bays<br />

have been envisaged in dimension <strong>of</strong><br />

150 X 115m switchyard taking into<br />

account one future bay. Further<br />

details <strong>of</strong> switchyard are normally<br />

worked out during FR/DPR stage.<br />

No reply is required.


6.5 Cost:<br />

According to PFR 5 no <strong>of</strong> 220KV line<br />

bays has been taken:<br />

Generator bays -2<br />

220KV line bays – 2<br />

Bus Coupler bays – 1<br />

Which is in order.<br />

8<br />

No reply is required.


REPLY ON COMMENTS OF CMDD DIRECTORATE, CWC ON PFR OF RINPI<br />

HE PROJECT<br />

(Letter No CWC P.U. No. 20/2/03-CMDD(E&NE)/136 dated 26.2.2004)<br />

Comments <strong>of</strong> CEA/CWC<br />

1. As per cl 6.2.1 the location <strong>of</strong> dam<br />

has been made keeping in view <strong>of</strong><br />

the topography, geology and<br />

maximum water availability at the<br />

proposed site. But the favorable<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> topography and<br />

geological features, which led the<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> dam site, should be<br />

incorporated in PFR.<br />

2. It should be mentioned in the<br />

report that the PMF value has been<br />

vetted by hydrology (NE)Dte.<br />

CWC.<br />

3. The report should contain<br />

geophysical information about the<br />

project site.<br />

4. Though the drawing shows a ski<br />

jump type <strong>of</strong> energy dissipater,<br />

nothing has been written in the<br />

submitted PFR regarding the<br />

energy dissipation arrangements.<br />

9<br />

Replies <strong>of</strong> Design Division<br />

The study on alternative layouts and<br />

alternative locations has been included in<br />

further studies during FR/DPR stage<br />

when more information on topography,<br />

geology, construction material etc. shall<br />

be available.<br />

Hydrology adopted is as per decisions<br />

taken in progress review meeting with<br />

CEA.<br />

The dam site is located in remote area,<br />

where proper approach was not available,<br />

therefore the geo-physical survey could<br />

not be conducted. The power house area<br />

is having sufficient rock exposures,<br />

hence the geo-physical survey was not<br />

required at this stage.<br />

These details shall be worked out during<br />

FR/DPR stage.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!