STUDIES OF ENERGY RECOVERY LINACS AT ... - CASA
STUDIES OF ENERGY RECOVERY LINACS AT ... - CASA
STUDIES OF ENERGY RECOVERY LINACS AT ... - CASA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
TABLE 2.4: Fractional energy spread measured at various locations in the machine with<br />
the injector set to 56 MeV.<br />
Location ∆E/E (10 −3 ) Energy (MeV)<br />
Injector 0.32 ± 0.01 56<br />
Arc 1 0.0080 ± 0.0023 556<br />
Arc 2 0.020 ± 0.0018 1056<br />
TABLE 2.5: Fractional energy spread measured at various locations in the machine with<br />
the injector set to 20 MeV.<br />
Location ∆E/E (10 −3 ) Energy (MeV)<br />
Injector 0.15 ± 0.01 20<br />
Arc 1 0.0072 ± 0.0010 520<br />
Arc 2 0.0100 ± 0.0014 1020<br />
For example, with an injection energy of 20 MeV, the intrinsic fractional energy<br />
spread is 0.15 × 10 −3 . With appropriate scaling, and for a perfectly phased linac,<br />
the arc 1 energy spread is expected to be [48]<br />
<br />
∆E<br />
=<br />
E 520<br />
<br />
∆E <br />
E<br />
20<br />
2 20<br />
+<br />
520<br />
<br />
δφ4 2<br />
55<br />
(2.19)<br />
where δφ is the rms bunch length in radians. Using the measured data, the con-<br />
tribution to the energy spread from the bunch length can be calculated. Plugging<br />
in values and solving for the bunch length yields 0.14 ◦ (rms). The expected energy<br />
spread in arc 2 can be calculated using Eq. (2.19) by modifying the energy scaling<br />
factor from (20/520) to (20/1020). The result is 0.0052 × 10 −3 and is 74% smaller<br />
than the measured value. The effect of RF crest phasing errors can cause increases<br />
in the observed fractional energy spread and can account for this discrepancy. The<br />
effect is illustrated in Fig. 2.18 and described by<br />
∆E = E cos(φo + δφ) − cos(φo − δφ) <br />
(2.20)<br />
where φo is the error in RF phase relative to on-crest acceleration. Equation (2.20)