04.08.2013 Views

STUDIES OF ENERGY RECOVERY LINACS AT ... - CASA

STUDIES OF ENERGY RECOVERY LINACS AT ... - CASA

STUDIES OF ENERGY RECOVERY LINACS AT ... - CASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the results of the fits.<br />

The vertical profile for both the 56 MeV and 20 MeV energy recovered beam<br />

are well represented by a single Gaussian over the complete (5 to 6 orders of mag-<br />

nitude) dynamic range. The horizontal profile for the 56 MeV beams shows a small<br />

additional contribution on the left side of the plot, most likely due to beam scrap-<br />

ing, however there still exists a good Gaussian fit over 5 orders of magnitude. The<br />

broader width of the horizontal profile at 20 MeV is explained by the fact that the<br />

measurement was located in a region of dispersion (0.5 m) and the width is there-<br />

fore scaled by a factor of ∆E/E. This may account for the observed increase in<br />

horizontal scraping and beam loss when operating with a 20 MeV injection energy.<br />

2.6 Measuring Energy Spread<br />

The rms beam size squared is expressed as<br />

σ 2 = βɛg + (ηδ) 2<br />

54<br />

(2.18)<br />

where η is the dispersion and δ (= ∆E/E) is the fractional energy spread. Emit-<br />

tance measurements were performed in regions of zero dispersion so that the only<br />

contribution to the beam size is from the beta function and the emittance. In<br />

the same manner, the energy spread can be measured in a dispersive region where<br />

(ηδ) 2 >> βɛg and the dispersion is known.<br />

The results of the energy spread measurements, which were performed only on<br />

the accelerating pass beam, are displayed in Table 2.4 and Table 2.5.<br />

On first inspection, the energy spread data does not follow the expected scaling<br />

relation with energy. Rather than decreasing with increasing beam energy, the<br />

measured relative energy spreads in arc 2 are greater than in arc 1. However, by<br />

taking into account RF phasing errors the data becomes consistent [47].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!