STUDIES OF ENERGY RECOVERY LINACS AT ... - CASA
STUDIES OF ENERGY RECOVERY LINACS AT ... - CASA
STUDIES OF ENERGY RECOVERY LINACS AT ... - CASA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TABLE 5.1: Comparison of simulation predictions, experimental results and the analytic<br />
calculation of the threshold current.<br />
Method Threshold Current (mA)<br />
Simulation TDBBU 2.1<br />
M<strong>AT</strong>BBU 2.1<br />
ERLBBU 2.1<br />
BI 2.1<br />
Experimental Direct Observation 2.3 ± 0.2<br />
Kicker-based BTF 2.3 ± 0.1<br />
Cavity-based BTF 2.4 ± 0.1<br />
Growth Rates 2.3 ± 0.2<br />
(method 1) 2.3 ± 0.1<br />
2.3 ± 0.1<br />
(method 2) 2.2 ± 0.2<br />
Analytic Analytic Formula 2.1<br />
in different current regimes (above and below the threshold) and working in both<br />
the time and frequency domain, there is complete agreement in determining the<br />
threshold current.<br />
To emphasize the value of the single mode threshold current derived in Sec-<br />
tion 4.2, Table 5.1 includes the threshold current as determined by plugging values<br />
for the 2106 MHz mode in Eq. (4.21). The analytic formula agrees very well with<br />
both simulations and experimental data.<br />
The results summarized in Table 5.1 represent the first time BBU simulation<br />
codes have been benchmarked with experimental data. The measured data and the<br />
simulation predictions agree to within 10%. As a consequence of benchmarking the<br />
codes, the validity of the analytic model used to describe BBU, and the threshold<br />
current formula in particular, have been confirmed.<br />
137