High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA
High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA
Pickup Experiment #2 #3 #4 Simulation #2 #3 LinearCoecientQuadraticCoecient #4 -0.0801 -0.0834 0.1172 0.0911 0.1070 0.0256 0.0016 0.0003 0.0008 0.0006 0.0007 obtainedtransfermapsaregatheredingure3.17.Forthecasewherethelaseristurnedo(see parmela-simulatedphase-phasetransfermap. measurementswereperformedatvariousstagesofthedetuningcurveoftheopticalcavity.The Table3.2:Comparisonofcoecientsobtainedfromthenon-lineartofthemeasuredand 0.0004 fold-overduetothenon-lineareectintroducedbythelaserinteractionislessimportant.We tothe\nominalphase"havealargertimeofightbecausenowtheyarecontributingtothelaser processandthereforearelessenergetic.Atvariousstageofdetuningcurvesthephase-phasemap extractamaximumoutputpower,thefold-overissubstantial,bunchesemittedwithphaseclose havesucceededinoperatingthelaseratthelimitofitsturn-opointbyproperlyadjustingthe toT555contribution.Howeverwhenthelaseristurnedon(seeg.3.17(B)),andoptimizedto cavity,inthisregion,(seeg.3.17(E))wecannoticethatthephase-phasetransfermaphastwo g.3.17(A)),thetransfermaplooksasusual,mainlylinearwithasmallparabolicbehaviordue transfermaphasthesamefold-overaswhenthelaserisoptimizedformaximumoutputpower(see contributions:forbunchcenteredaroundthezero-crossingphase(i.e.10
φ OUT (RF−Deg) 5 0 −A− Nominal Trim Quad Off Trim Quad Reversed −5 −40 −20 0 20 40 5 0 −B− Nominal Trim Quad Off Trim Quad Reversed −5 −40 −20 0 20 40 −C− −D− Figure3.16:Demonstrationoflongitudinaldierence-orbit:phase-phasetransfermapmeasured 5 5 (A)andsimulated(B)forthreedierentsettingsofthetrimquadrupole.Plot(C)and(D)correspondtodierenceofthemeasuredmappresentedinthetoprawforrespectivelytheexperiment Off−Nominal andthesimulation. Off−Nominal 0 0 Reversed−Nominal Reversed−Nominal −5 −5 −40 −20 0 20 40 −40 −20 0 20 40 themomentumcompaction,R56.Sincethequadrupoleintroduceapathlengthvariationlinearly 3.4.7Measurementofhinjoutitransfermap EectsoftheTrimQuadrupoles Thetrimquadrupolefamilyhastwoeectsontheenergy-phasecorrelation.Firstlyitmodies φ (RF−Deg) φ (RF−Deg) IN IN Theresultsarepresentedingure3.18:alineartofthemeasuredtransfermaphasbeenper- Wehavemeasured,usingthenominalopticallatticesetuptheenergy-phasetransfermapatboth pickupcavitieslocateddownstreamarc1and2(pickupcavity#3and#4)onthegure3.12. dependentontheenergyoset.Alsoviaitssecondordercoecient,thetrimquadrupolesalso introducedaquadraticallyenergyosetdependentpathlengthvariationwhichresultsinamodicationofthenonlinearmomentumcompactionT566=houtj20i. φ OUT (RF−Deg)
- Page 13 and 14: ListofFigures 1.1Comparisonoftheexp
- Page 15 and 16: 3.11Momentumcompactionandnonlinearm
- Page 17 and 18: 4.18Overviewofthephasespacesampling
- Page 19 and 20: 5.16Interferogrammeasuredfordierent
- Page 21 and 22: 6.10Comparisonofthermstransversehor
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter1 UVdomainandareplannedtogen
- Page 25 and 26: space-chargeinthelowenergyregime,an
- Page 27 and 28: !Vjitsthevelocity,and!Xjisthepositi
- Page 29 and 30: equation boundarybetweenvacuumandam
- Page 31 and 32: 10 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.
- Page 33 and 34: 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 E=10 MeV E=42 M
- Page 35 and 36: 00000000000000000000000000000000000
- Page 37 and 38: harmonicwithproperchoiceoftheKvalue
- Page 39 and 40: Bu(rms)0.28T ParameterValueUnit Nu
- Page 41: 2.7TheJeersonLabIRproject usedasexp
- Page 44 and 45: Study TheFELdriveraccelerator:Latti
- Page 46 and 47: ParameterValue x -0.178 x(m) 8.331
- Page 48 and 49: Thepurposeofmeasuringthetransverser
- Page 50 and 51: computedusingthelatticeset-upuseddu
- Page 52 and 53: etatronexcitationaspicturedingure3.
- Page 54 and 55: ∆ x (mm), Corrector 0F00H ∆ x (
- Page 56 and 57: 1 0.5 0 spreadoftheparticlewassetto
- Page 58 and 59: 2 1 −5 −3 −1 1 3 5 k (m q −
- Page 60 and 61: Experimentallythecalibrationcoecien
- Page 62 and 63: tioned.FromthetransferfunctioninFig
- Page 66 and 67: Fromthesebothmeasurementitispossibl
- Page 68 and 69: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 70 and 71: 10 5 Sext. ON Figure3.20:Eectofthes
- Page 72 and 73: spaceabeamthatconsistsofNparticles,
- Page 74 and 75: Asforthegeometricemittanceonecanden
- Page 76 and 77: (a) ceramic radiator beam x-wire be
- Page 78 and 79: and validundertheassumptionofaunifo
- Page 80 and 81: 1000 900 800 700 Figure4.4:Steadyst
- Page 82 and 83: Fraction of Beam enclosed within (%
- Page 84 and 85: 5 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 5 2 Foi
- Page 86 and 87: Actuator Inserts Foil and Mirror CI
- Page 88 and 89: shortterm,touseasbeamdensitymonitor
- Page 90 and 91: Alongwiththeseimplementedoperations
- Page 92 and 93: whereiistheerrorontheithbeamsizemea
- Page 94 and 95: Let'sassumethethinlensapproximation
- Page 96 and 97: obtainedviathestatisticalanalysis.T
- Page 98 and 99: 20 18 16 . 14 . 12 . Figure4.14:Rel
- Page 100 and 101: 100 10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 10 that
- Page 102 and 103: multislits mask (copper) Aluminum F
- Page 104: TheReductionoftheSpaceChargeconditi
- Page 107 and 108: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 109 and 110: Table4.7:Typicalsystematicerroronem
- Page 111 and 112: 180 8 160 6 Figure4.22:Anexampleof2
- Page 113 and 114: 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 Figure4.24:Emittanc
Pickup Experiment #2 #3 #4 Simulation #2 #3 LinearCoecientQuadraticCoecient<br />
#4 -0.0801 -0.0834 0.1172 0.0911 0.1070 0.0256 0.0016 0.0003 0.0008 0.0006 0.0007<br />
obtainedtransfermapsaregatheredingure3.17.Forthecasewherethelaseristurnedo(see parmela-simulatedphase-phasetransfermap. measurementswereperformedatvariousstagesofthedetuningcurveoftheopticalcavity.The Table3.2:Comparisonofcoecientsobtainedfromthenon-lineartofthemeasured<strong>and</strong> 0.0004<br />
fold-overduetothenon-lineareectintroducedbythelaserinteractionislessimportant.We tothe\nominalphase"havealargertimeofightbecausenowtheyarecontributingtothelaser process<strong>and</strong>thereforearelessenergetic.Atvariousstageofdetuningcurvesthephase-phasemap extractamaximumoutputpower,thefold-overissubstantial,bunchesemittedwithphaseclose havesucceededinoperatingthelaseratthelimitofitsturn-opointbyproperlyadjustingthe toT555contribution.Howeverwhenthelaseristurnedon(seeg.3.17(B)),<strong>and</strong>optimizedto cavity,inthisregion,(seeg.3.17(E))wecannoticethatthephase-phasetransfermaphastwo g.3.17(A)),thetransfermaplooksasusual,mainlylinearwithasmallparabolicbehaviordue<br />
transfermaphasthesamefold-overaswhenthelaserisoptimizedformaximumoutputpower(see contributions:forbunchcenteredaroundthezero-crossingphase(i.e.10