High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA
High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA
5.28Comparisonfor=0:2%(topleft)andfor=2%(topright)ofthebeamrmssize 5.29Schematicsoftheavailablediagnosticsintheundulatorregionformeasuringthe dashedlineontheseplotsisthebeamsizecontributionduetodispersiononly. variationinthecenterofthebunchcompressorversustheexcitationofanupstream quadrupoleusingdimadsimulation(solidlines),usingEqn.(5.57)(crosses).The 5.30ComparisonofthelongitudinalphasespaceattheCTRfoil(greydots)andthe right)............................................135 Thebottomplotspresenttheratioofthebeamsizecontributionduetodispersion decompressormid-point(blackdots).Theenergydistributionareexactlythesame longitudinalemittance....................................135 onlywiththetotalbeamsizefor=0:2%(bottomleft)and=2%(bottom 5.31rmsenergyspreadinducedbywakeeldsgeneratedasa60pCbunchofelectron 6.1SimpliedschematicoftheIRFELphotoinjector(seetextforexplanation)......138 travelsthroughthevacuumchambertransitionattheundulatorlocation.......136 whilethebunchlengthattheCTRfoilissmaller(dashedlines)thanatthechicane mid-point(solidlines)....................................136 6.3\spacechargeoveremittanceratioforthetransverse(Rr)andlongitudinal(Rz) 6.2RMStransverse(xandy)andlongitudinal(z)beamsizesalongtheinjector. Thebottomschematicslocatestheopticalelementsalongthebeamline(thegun acceleratingvoltageis350keV)..............................139 6.5Focallengthoftherst(cavity#4)andsecond(cavity#3)cryounitcavitiesversus 6.4Reducedenergygain,,alongtherst(cavity#4)andsecond(cavity#3)cryounit cavity.............................................142 direction...........................................141 6.7Comparisonofthetransversebeamdensitymeasuredattheexitoftheaccelerating 6.6SteeringeectduetoFPandHOMcouplerinthecryounitversus,thephase structure(A)withparticlepushingnumericalsimulation(B)..............146 dierencew.r.t.themaximumenergyphase(so-called\crestphase").........145 ,thephasedierencew.r.t.themaximumenergyphase(so-called\crestphase")144 6.8Measured(squares)andpredictedtransverseemittances(solidanddashlines)atthe 6.9BeamdensitymeasuredonthehighdispersionOTRmonitorforninedierentbunch cryounitexitversustheemittancesolenoidmagneticeld................147 gradientsettings(theimages(A)to(I)correspondstothepointspresenteding.6.10 startingfromthelowgradientvalues)..........................148
6.10Comparisonofthermstransversehorizontalbeamsizemeasuredinthehighdisper- 6.11\R55"transfermapgeneratedwithparmelafor(1)dierentcavitymodel(3Dmaa 6.12\R55"transfermapfordierentexperimentaloperatingpointsofthebunchergrasionOTRmonitorwiththeoneexpectedfromparmela................149 numericalsimulations.(Firstseriesofmeasurement)..................151 dient.Themeasurementsarealsocomparedwiththe\ideal"injectordevisedfrom thecasewherethepickupcavityislocateddownstreamthecryounitafteradriftin adispersion-freeregion...................................150 and2Dsupersh)atthepickupcavitylocatedintheinjectionchicaneand(2)for 6.13ComparisonofthemeasuredR55patternaftertheFELwasoptimizedwiththe 6.14rmsbunchlengthevolutionalongtheIRFELfromthephotocathodeuptotheexit 6.15Variationofthebunchlengthversusthelinacacceleratingphaseperparmelasim- \ideal"R55patterngeneratedwithparmela(usingthesecondsetup).........152 ofthesecondchicane....................................153 6.16Phasespacedistortionduetochromaticaberrationatthedecompressorchicaneexit (topplots)andthearc1exit(bottomplots).......................156 coveredfromtheCTRautocorrelationusingthetechniquementionedinChapter5]. Comparisonbetweentheexperimentalandsimulatedbunchlongitudinaldistribution (C).TotalCTRpowersignalmeasuredduringplot(B)experiment(D).......154 ulation(A)andmeasured(B)["measured"meansthebunchdistributionwasre 6.17Emittancegrowthduetochromaticaberrationversusthemomentumspreadand 6.19SchematicsofCSRselfinteractionofabunch.......................160 6.18Evolutionofbeamparameters(bunchlengthz,rmsenergyspreadE,transverse emittances~"x;y,andrmsbeamsizesx;y)versustheoperatingacceleratingphaseof thelinac...........................................158 energyosetofthebeam..................................157 6.20AnalyticalcomputationforCSR-inducedenergylossalongagaussianbunchand 6.21TransverseHorizontalemittanceandtotalpowerCTRsignalmeasuredasafunction 6.22Energydistributionmeasuredalongthebeamline,atthechicanemidpoint(A)and chicane(macroparticlewith>0areinthebunchtail)................161 predictionusingasimplenumericalmodelinamodiedversionofthescparmela codefor200m(A)and100m(B).Thesystemconsideredisasimpleachromatic ofthelinacgangphase...................................162 (B)andentranceofthearcs(C)and(D)[thehorizontalaxisoftheseplotrepresent therelativeenergyspread(nounits)].Thebottomplotpresentsthermsrelative energyspreadcomputedfromthedistributions......................163
- Page 1 and 2: HighBrightnessElectronBeamDiagnosti
- Page 3 and 4: eratedupto48MeVpriortothelasingsyst
- Page 5 and 6: IthanktheCEBAFmachineoperators,with
- Page 7 and 8: 3.4MeasurementoftheLongitudinalResp
- Page 9 and 10: 5.6ZerophasingTechniqueforBunchLeng
- Page 11 and 12: ListofTables 3.2Comparisonofcoecien
- Page 13 and 14: ListofFigures 1.1Comparisonoftheexp
- Page 15 and 16: 3.11Momentumcompactionandnonlinearm
- Page 17 and 18: 4.18Overviewofthephasespacesampling
- Page 19: 5.16Interferogrammeasuredfordierent
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter1 UVdomainandareplannedtogen
- Page 25 and 26: space-chargeinthelowenergyregime,an
- Page 27 and 28: !Vjitsthevelocity,and!Xjisthepositi
- Page 29 and 30: equation boundarybetweenvacuumandam
- Page 31 and 32: 10 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.
- Page 33 and 34: 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 E=10 MeV E=42 M
- Page 35 and 36: 00000000000000000000000000000000000
- Page 37 and 38: harmonicwithproperchoiceoftheKvalue
- Page 39 and 40: Bu(rms)0.28T ParameterValueUnit Nu
- Page 41: 2.7TheJeersonLabIRproject usedasexp
- Page 44 and 45: Study TheFELdriveraccelerator:Latti
- Page 46 and 47: ParameterValue x -0.178 x(m) 8.331
- Page 48 and 49: Thepurposeofmeasuringthetransverser
- Page 50 and 51: computedusingthelatticeset-upuseddu
- Page 52 and 53: etatronexcitationaspicturedingure3.
- Page 54 and 55: ∆ x (mm), Corrector 0F00H ∆ x (
- Page 56 and 57: 1 0.5 0 spreadoftheparticlewassetto
- Page 58 and 59: 2 1 −5 −3 −1 1 3 5 k (m q −
- Page 60 and 61: Experimentallythecalibrationcoecien
- Page 62 and 63: tioned.FromthetransferfunctioninFig
- Page 64 and 65: Pickup Experiment #2 #3 #4 Simulati
- Page 66 and 67: Fromthesebothmeasurementitispossibl
- Page 68 and 69: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.28Comparisonfor=0:2%(topleft)<strong>and</strong>for=2%(topright)ofthebeamrmssize<br />
5.29Schematicsoftheavailablediagnosticsintheundulatorregionformeasuringthe dashedlineontheseplotsisthebeamsizecontributionduetodispersiononly. variationinthecenterofthebunchcompressorversustheexcitationofanupstream quadrupoleusingdimadsimulation(solidlines),usingEqn.(5.57)(crosses).The<br />
5.30ComparisonofthelongitudinalphasespaceattheCTRfoil(greydots)<strong>and</strong>the right)............................................135 Thebottomplotspresenttheratioofthebeamsizecontributionduetodispersion<br />
decompressormid-point(blackdots).Theenergydistributionareexactlythesame longitudinalemittance....................................135 onlywiththetotalbeamsizefor=0:2%(bottomleft)<strong>and</strong>=2%(bottom<br />
5.31rmsenergyspreadinducedbywakeeldsgeneratedasa60pCbunchofelectron 6.1SimpliedschematicoftheIRFELphotoinjector(seetextforexplanation)......138 travelsthroughthevacuumchambertransitionattheundulatorlocation.......136 whilethebunchlengthattheCTRfoilissmaller(dashedlines)thanatthechicane mid-point(solidlines)....................................136<br />
6.3\spacechargeoveremittanceratioforthetransverse(Rr)<strong>and</strong>longitudinal(Rz) 6.2RMStransverse(x<strong>and</strong>y)<strong>and</strong>longitudinal(z)beamsizesalongtheinjector. Thebottomschematicslocatestheopticalelementsalongthebeamline(thegun acceleratingvoltageis350keV)..............................139<br />
6.5Focallengthoftherst(cavity#4)<strong>and</strong>second(cavity#3)cryounitcavitiesversus 6.4Reducedenergygain,,alongtherst(cavity#4)<strong>and</strong>second(cavity#3)cryounit cavity.............................................142 direction...........................................141<br />
6.7Comparisonofthetransversebeamdensitymeasuredattheexitoftheaccelerating 6.6SteeringeectduetoFP<strong>and</strong>HOMcouplerinthecryounitversus,thephase structure(A)withparticlepushingnumericalsimulation(B)..............146 dierencew.r.t.themaximumenergyphase(so-called\crestphase").........145 ,thephasedierencew.r.t.themaximumenergyphase(so-called\crestphase")144<br />
6.8Measured(squares)<strong>and</strong>predictedtransverseemittances(solid<strong>and</strong>dashlines)atthe 6.9<strong>Beam</strong>densitymeasuredonthehighdispersionOTRmonitorforninedierentbunch cryounitexitversustheemittancesolenoidmagneticeld................147 gradientsettings(theimages(A)to(I)correspondstothepointspresenteding.6.10 startingfromthelowgradientvalues)..........................148