High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4 2 0 R55patterngeneratedwithparmela(usingthesecondsetup). (positioni)toitsexit(positionf): Figure6.13:ComparisonofthemeasuredR55patternaftertheFELwasoptimizedwiththe\ideal" −2 Measurement Simulation −4 whichindeedessentiallymodifythecorrelationtermhzii.Hence,undertheassumptionthatthe −6 bunchisnotsignicantlyvaryingwiththelinacsetpoint,theminimumbunchlengthisgivenby wherewehaveusedthedenitionofrmslongitudinalemittancetowritethefarrightexpression. Inthepresentconguration,theparameterattheentranceofthechicanearesetbythelinac; hz2if=R255hz2ii+2R55R56hzii+R256h2ii=R255hz2ii+2R55R56hzii+R256~"2z+hzi2i hz2ii(6.16) −40 −20 0 20 40 Drive−Laser Phase φIN (RF−Deg) caneispresentedingure6.14.Experimentallythetypicalbunchlengthmeasuredintheundulatorcomputedaccordingtoparmelafromthephotocathodesurfaceuptotheexitofthesecondchiditionforachievingminimalbunchlengthafterthecompressorsystemis(dE=dz)i=1=R56.By settingthelinacphaseandacceleratinggradientsuchthattheaforementionedmatchingcondition isfullled,andbecauseoftheinitialemittance,theminimumbunchlengthachieved,vianumerical simulations,attheundulatorlocationisabout140m(rms).Theevolutionofthebunchlength introducethelongitudinalphasespaceslope(dE=dz)i=hzii=hz2ii;thereforethe\matching"con- thecondition@hz2if=@hzii=0,whichgivestherelationhzii=hz2ii=1=R56;bydenitionwe vicinityisapproximately100m(rms),anexampleofreconstructedbunchshape(usingtheinverse HilberttransformtechniquedetailedinChapter5)iscomparedwithabeamprolegeneratedwith parmelaingure6.15(C).Withinthelevelofaccuracy7,wehavegoodagreement.Byvaryingthe phaseofthelinac(therebychangingthequantityhzii)wecanvarythebunchlength;wepresent theresultofsuchanexperimentingure6.15(B)alongwithresultsfromnumericalsimulation(in donotgiveauniquelongitudinaldistribution,andtherearealotofassumptionsthathavetobeconsidered(e.g. extrapolationoftheCTRspectrumatlowfrequency,...) 7(1)weonlyused500macroparticlesinthenumericalsimulation,(2)theHilberttransformation,aswehaveseen T−O−F at Pickup Cavity φ OUT (RF−deg)
10 1 5 10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Distance from photocathode (cm) -1 10 5 2 0 2 thesecondchicane. Figure6.14:rmsbunchlengthevolutionalongtheIRFELfromthephotocathodeuptotheexitof Injector Chicane Chicane plot(B));forcompletenesswealsoincludeingure6.15(D)thetotalCTRpowerdetected.Wend Aswementionedintheverybeginningofthisreport,onemotivation,foroperationalpurpose,of tothemeasuredvariation. 6.3BeamParametersMeasurementPriorto\Firstlasing" thatthebunchlengthpredictedvianumericalmodelinghasalesspronouncedvariationcompared sucientbeamqualitytoenabletheFELtooperatehowevertheachievedparametersaresomewhat largerthantheonethatcouldbetheoreticallyreachedaspredictedfromnumericalmodeling,except theexperimentallyachievedandthenumericallyexpectedvalues.Itisseenthatwehaveachieved damagedtheundulatorbecauseofradiationshowersinducedastheelectronbeam"scrapes"on thevacuumchamber.Intable6.3wepresentsomeofthebeamparametersrequiredalongwith magnetwasremoved,themainreasonbeingthatduringthis\tuningperiod"wecouldhave thediagnosticsdevelopedhereinistoverifytheelectronbeamqualityiswithinthespecications forthebunchlength.Withtheaboveparametersrstlightwasachievedatlowdutycyclewithina toenabletheFELtolase.IntheearlystageofthecommissioningoftheIRFEL,theundulator betweenthenumericalmodelandtheachievedparameter. beam.OntheBeamPhysicspointofviewitisinterestingtotrytounderstandthediscrepancies coupleofhoursafterweinstalledtheundulatormagnet,andtwodayslaterwewereabletooperate theFELwithanoutputpowerof150W(cw),therebydemonstratingthequalityoftheelectron RMS bunch length (mm) Wiggler Location
Page 1 and 2:
HighBrightnessElectronBeamDiagnosti
Page 3 and 4:
eratedupto48MeVpriortothelasingsyst
Page 5 and 6:
IthanktheCEBAFmachineoperators,with
Page 7 and 8:
3.4MeasurementoftheLongitudinalResp
Page 9 and 10:
5.6ZerophasingTechniqueforBunchLeng
Page 11 and 12:
ListofTables 3.2Comparisonofcoecien
Page 13 and 14:
ListofFigures 1.1Comparisonoftheexp
Page 15 and 16:
3.11Momentumcompactionandnonlinearm
Page 17 and 18:
4.18Overviewofthephasespacesampling
Page 19 and 20:
5.16Interferogrammeasuredfordierent
Page 21 and 22:
6.10Comparisonofthermstransversehor
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter1 UVdomainandareplannedtogen
Page 25 and 26:
space-chargeinthelowenergyregime,an
Page 27 and 28:
!Vjitsthevelocity,and!Xjisthepositi
Page 29 and 30:
equation boundarybetweenvacuumandam
Page 31 and 32:
10 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.
Page 33 and 34:
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 E=10 MeV E=42 M
Page 35 and 36:
00000000000000000000000000000000000
Page 37 and 38:
harmonicwithproperchoiceoftheKvalue
Page 39 and 40:
Bu(rms)0.28T ParameterValueUnit Nu
Page 41:
2.7TheJeersonLabIRproject usedasexp
Page 44 and 45:
Study TheFELdriveraccelerator:Latti
Page 46 and 47:
ParameterValue x -0.178 x(m) 8.331
Page 48 and 49:
Thepurposeofmeasuringthetransverser
Page 50 and 51:
computedusingthelatticeset-upuseddu
Page 52 and 53:
etatronexcitationaspicturedingure3.
Page 54 and 55:
∆ x (mm), Corrector 0F00H ∆ x (
Page 56 and 57:
1 0.5 0 spreadoftheparticlewassetto
Page 58 and 59:
2 1 −5 −3 −1 1 3 5 k (m q −
Page 60 and 61:
Experimentallythecalibrationcoecien
Page 62 and 63:
tioned.FromthetransferfunctioninFig
Page 64 and 65:
Pickup Experiment #2 #3 #4 Simulati
Page 66 and 67:
Fromthesebothmeasurementitispossibl
Page 68 and 69:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page 70 and 71:
10 5 Sext. ON Figure3.20:Eectofthes
Page 72 and 73:
spaceabeamthatconsistsofNparticles,
Page 74 and 75:
Asforthegeometricemittanceonecanden
Page 76 and 77:
(a) ceramic radiator beam x-wire be
Page 78 and 79:
and validundertheassumptionofaunifo
Page 80 and 81:
1000 900 800 700 Figure4.4:Steadyst
Page 82 and 83:
Fraction of Beam enclosed within (%
Page 84 and 85:
5 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 5 2 Foi
Page 86 and 87:
Actuator Inserts Foil and Mirror CI
Page 88 and 89:
shortterm,touseasbeamdensitymonitor
Page 90 and 91:
Alongwiththeseimplementedoperations
Page 92 and 93:
whereiistheerrorontheithbeamsizemea
Page 94 and 95:
Let'sassumethethinlensapproximation
Page 96 and 97:
obtainedviathestatisticalanalysis.T
Page 98 and 99:
20 18 16 . 14 . 12 . Figure4.14:Rel
Page 100 and 101:
100 10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 10 that
Page 102 and 103:
multislits mask (copper) Aluminum F
Page 104:
TheReductionoftheSpaceChargeconditi
Page 107 and 108:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page 109 and 110:
Table4.7:Typicalsystematicerroronem
Page 111 and 112:
180 8 160 6 Figure4.22:Anexampleof2
Page 113 and 114:
4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 Figure4.24:Emittanc
Page 115 and 116:
Characterization LongitudinalPhaseS
Page 117 and 118:
concentrateonthebeamparametersinthe
Page 119 and 120:
1.1 1 mrad 0.9 5 mrad mainlyduetoth
Page 121 and 122:
Population Population 100000 90000
Page 123 and 124: Theequation5.8yields: f()=jZ+1 11Xn
Page 125 and 126: presentanoutlineofthisproofbelow,an
Page 127 and 128: contrastintheCEBAFmachine,varyingas
Page 129 and 130: 1.5 1 correspondtothevarianceofveco
Page 131 and 132: Ε’ 2 B Mirror M 2 Ε2 Polarizer
Page 133 and 134: FinallyitisinterestingtonotethatFou
Page 135 and 136: Itsautocorrelationis:S(z)=8>:(1=w2)
Page 137 and 138: drivelaserwhereasin(A),suchoperatio
Page 139 and 140: expansionoftheBFFderivedinthischapt
Page 141 and 142: Asarstapproximation,wecanestimatetr
Page 143 and 144: errorpropagation8theoryappliedonEqn
Page 145 and 146: inducedbyspacechargeisnotaconcernin
Page 147 and 148: Golay Cell Signal (V) Golay Cell Si
Page 149 and 150: Golay Cell Ouput (V) Golay Cell Oup
Page 151 and 152: 150 100 5 4 Figure5.19:Energyspectr
Page 153 and 154: Figure5.23:picturaleectoflongitudin
Page 155 and 156: . .. .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .
Page 157 and 158: σ x (m) x 10−3 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 5 1
Page 159 and 160: BeamDynamicsStudies Chapter6 undula
Page 161 and 162: x,y (mm) 6.0 4.8 3.6 2.4 1.2 x y 0.
Page 163 and 164: Space Charge over Emittance Ratio (
Page 165 and 166: numericalsolution[56].Thisapproxima
Page 167 and 168: 0.03 . .... . .. ... . .. ..... . .
Page 169 and 170: ε x (mm−mrad) Nominal 6 4 2 cryo
Page 171 and 172: 2.2 2 1.8 Figure6.10:Comparisonofth
Page 173: 6 4 2 Figure6.12:\R55"transfermapfo
Page 177 and 178: EnergySpread(%) BunchLength(mm) Par
Page 179 and 180: 15 Effect of RMS energy Spread 10 F
Page 181 and 182: 6.4.4BunchSelfInteractionviaCoheren
Page 183 and 184: 100 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
Page 185 and 186: Inthesecondseriesofrun,wewereableto
Page 187 and 188: Conclusion Chapter7 Therecirculator
Page 189 and 190: [2]Y.Shibata,T.Takahashi,T.Kanai,K.
Page 191 and 192: [29]J.-C.Denard,C.Bochetta,G.Traomb
Page 193 and 194: [65]B.C.Yunn,\ImpedancesintheIRFEL"
Page 195 and 196: TEM:transverseelectricmagnetic. TOF
Page 197 and 198: B.2Anoteonspacecharge Wedenetheslop
Page 199 and 200: B.3.3PARMELA FeaturesofJeersonLabVe
Page 201 and 202: Initialization MAIN Stop INPUT DECK
Page 203 and 204: C.0.6TheDispersionRelationsfor^S(!)
Page 205 and 206: have: Howeveritshouldbenotedthatweh
Page 207: FigureD.1:OverviewoftheRF-controlsy
show all

High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?