High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA
High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA High Brightness Electron Beam Diagnostics and their ... - CASA
Slope(Mev/m)36.170633.741231.206727.9008 C1 X+RMS(mm)1.84343.28604.72586.1368 #zero.cav1 C0 XRMS(mm)0.87892.42823.93525.4319 z(mm) 1.16561.08731.00560.8991 3.70287.405711.108514.8114 0.39000.39010.39150.3913 2 3 4 casesandwehaveestimatedthisvariationforthenormalizedslopeddzto0.54%/m. Table5.3:rmsbeamhorizontalsizesimulatedwiththeparmelaparticlepushingcodeonthe 5.6.2NumericalSimulationoftheMethod energyrecoverytransferlineprolemeasurementstation. Wehavenumericallyperformedabunchlengthmeasurementforthenominalsettingsusingthe onando.Itisnoticedthatthevariationoftheslopeduetospacechargeisthesameforallthe distance).ThebeamsizemeasuredattheOTRlocationareshowningure5.25,forthetwozerophasingvalues90deg,versusthenumberofzero-phasingcavities.Inthegurewealsosimulate bunchlengthof370mthecomputedbunchlengthisalwaysoverestimatedbyabout20m. statementthatwecouldunambiguouslydeconvolvetransversespacechargeeectcontributionto OntheotherhandthecoecientC1isdependentonthenumberofcavities(infactonthedrift themeasurementwiththeparmelaspace-chargeroutineturnedotoverifyagainourprevious checktheconstancyofthemethod.Table1summarizestheresultsweobtained.Forthenominal relationsderivedabove.Wehavedonesuchmeasurementusing1,2,3,and4zerophasingcavitiesto thebeamsize.Ingure5.26,wepresentthebeamdistributioninthetransverseplanealongwith thehorizontalbeamprojection,inthecasewherefourcavitiesareusedaszerophasingcavities. 5.6.3ExperimentalResults Duringtheearlystageofthecommissioningofthelinac,weattemptedabunchlengthmeasurement usingthezerophasingmethod.Wetriedtozerophasedierentnumbersofcavitiesandsincethe bunchlengthwaslargerthanexpectedweneededonlytousetwocavities. phasespaceslopedE UsingEqn.(5.52)wegetanrmsbunchlengthestimateofz'488112mandthelongitudinal thesevaluesyieldXRMS'1:9mmandX+RMS'4:7mm. Thermssizeofthehorizontalprojectionofthebeamspots,presenteding.5.27,recordedduring thezerophasingexperimentarerespectively:0x'3:5mm,90 Duringourexperiment,thegradientofthetwozerophasingcavitieswassetto7:33MV=m,the C0denedinEqn.(5.49)isapproximatelyC0'7:19. totalenergyoftheincomingbeamwasestimatedtobe23.75MeV;withsuchvaluetheconstant optimized.Alsonotethattheerrorbaronthebunchlengthmeasurementisobtainedusingthe wasperformed:theinjectorbeamdynamicswasnotyetfullyunderstoodandthesettingsnot predictedwithparmela.Thesediscrepancieswerenotrelevantatthetimethemeasurement dz'82MeV=m.Bothofthesevaluesareindisagreementwiththeparameters x'5:8mmand+90 x'4:0mm;
errorpropagation8theoryappliedonEqn.(5.49),assuminganuncertaintyof10%on,VRF,and 5.7.1Method thebeamsizesmeasurement,andarelativeerrorof2%onthebeamenergyinferredfromthedipole magnetstrength. Theestimationofthebeamenergyspreadisperformedbymeasuringtransversebeamproleina planewherethereissignicantdispersion.InthecaseoftheIRFEL,severallocationscanbeused 5.7IntrinsicEnergySpreadMeasurement horizontalplaneinourcase,thermsbeamsizeiswritten: andvariouslocationintherecirculationarc.Intheplanewheredispersionoccurs,i.e.inthe tomeasuretheenergyspread.Typicalhigh-dispersionpointare,symmetrypointsofthechicane suredorestimatedviamagneticopticscode,thelatterrequiresanemittancemeasurement(ina dispersionfreeregion)andthepropagationoftheTwissparameterstothedispersiveregionwhere FromEqn.(5.57)weseethattodeducetheenergyspreadwemustknowthedispersionfunction, Thiscommonlyusedrelationisvalidaslongasnonlinearitiesinthetransportisnegligible.Typically,forthenominalenergy(withoutlasing)spreadintheIRFEL(0.2%RMS)itcanbeused.,butalsothebetatroncontribution~"tothebeamsize.Thoughtheformercanbeeasilymea- x=h()2+~"i1=2 (5.57) energyspreadistobemeasured.Indeedwecanavoidtheemittancemeasurement9byvaryingthe strengthofanupstreamquadrupolewhileobservingthebeamsizeonthedispersivelocation,until thebeamsizeisminimum.Atthatpointthebetatrontermcontributiontothebeamsizeisthe smallestpossible.Ingure5.28,wepresentthebeamsizevariationfortwoscenariiofenergyspread (i.e.thecasewerethelaserisoi.e.'0:2%andoni.e.'2%).Forthelowestenergyspread entranceofamagneticsystem,withazero-energyspread,andletx0;,x0;bethesamecoordinates onederivedfromEqn.(5.57).Thisdisagreementcomesfromthenon-negligiblenonlineardispersion atthelocationofthebeamsizemeasurementwhichrendersEqn.(5.57)diculttouse(becauseit onlycontainslineardispersion):Letx0;0,x0;0bethepositionanddivergenceofanelectronatthe theminimumbeamrmssizesimulatedwithdimadiscomparabletothequantity.Howeverfor associatedtoanelectronwithanenergyspread.Insidethebendingsystemthatgeneratesenergy largerenergyspread,weobservediscrepanciesbetweenthevaluecomputedfromdimadandthe spread,wewillhave: 8Thesystematicerror,z,onthebunchlengthcomputationis: E202RF(X+RMS)2+(XRMS)2 (z)2=2RF(X+RMS)2+(XRMS)2 xf;0=R11x0;0+R12x0;0 xf;=R11x0;+R12x0;+R16+T1662 822V2RF (E0)2+E202RF(X+RMS)2+(XRMS)2 842V2RF ()2+ (5.58) 9SuggestionfromD.R.Douglas 822V4RF (VRF)2+E202RF16(0x)2(0x)2+4(x)2(x)2+4(+x)2(+x)2 3222V2RF(X+RMS)2+(XRMS)2
- Page 92 and 93: whereiistheerrorontheithbeamsizemea
- Page 94 and 95: Let'sassumethethinlensapproximation
- Page 96 and 97: obtainedviathestatisticalanalysis.T
- Page 98 and 99: 20 18 16 . 14 . 12 . Figure4.14:Rel
- Page 100 and 101: 100 10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 10 that
- Page 102 and 103: multislits mask (copper) Aluminum F
- Page 104: TheReductionoftheSpaceChargeconditi
- Page 107 and 108: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 109 and 110: Table4.7:Typicalsystematicerroronem
- Page 111 and 112: 180 8 160 6 Figure4.22:Anexampleof2
- Page 113 and 114: 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 Figure4.24:Emittanc
- Page 115 and 116: Characterization LongitudinalPhaseS
- Page 117 and 118: concentrateonthebeamparametersinthe
- Page 119 and 120: 1.1 1 mrad 0.9 5 mrad mainlyduetoth
- Page 121 and 122: Population Population 100000 90000
- Page 123 and 124: Theequation5.8yields: f()=jZ+1 11Xn
- Page 125 and 126: presentanoutlineofthisproofbelow,an
- Page 127 and 128: contrastintheCEBAFmachine,varyingas
- Page 129 and 130: 1.5 1 correspondtothevarianceofveco
- Page 131 and 132: Ε’ 2 B Mirror M 2 Ε2 Polarizer
- Page 133 and 134: FinallyitisinterestingtonotethatFou
- Page 135 and 136: Itsautocorrelationis:S(z)=8>:(1=w2)
- Page 137 and 138: drivelaserwhereasin(A),suchoperatio
- Page 139 and 140: expansionoftheBFFderivedinthischapt
- Page 141: Asarstapproximation,wecanestimatetr
- Page 145 and 146: inducedbyspacechargeisnotaconcernin
- Page 147 and 148: Golay Cell Signal (V) Golay Cell Si
- Page 149 and 150: Golay Cell Ouput (V) Golay Cell Oup
- Page 151 and 152: 150 100 5 4 Figure5.19:Energyspectr
- Page 153 and 154: Figure5.23:picturaleectoflongitudin
- Page 155 and 156: . .. .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .
- Page 157 and 158: σ x (m) x 10−3 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 5 1
- Page 159 and 160: BeamDynamicsStudies Chapter6 undula
- Page 161 and 162: x,y (mm) 6.0 4.8 3.6 2.4 1.2 x y 0.
- Page 163 and 164: Space Charge over Emittance Ratio (
- Page 165 and 166: numericalsolution[56].Thisapproxima
- Page 167 and 168: 0.03 . .... . .. ... . .. ..... . .
- Page 169 and 170: ε x (mm−mrad) Nominal 6 4 2 cryo
- Page 171 and 172: 2.2 2 1.8 Figure6.10:Comparisonofth
- Page 173 and 174: 6 4 2 Figure6.12:\R55"transfermapfo
- Page 175 and 176: 10 1 5 10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
- Page 177 and 178: EnergySpread(%) BunchLength(mm) Par
- Page 179 and 180: 15 Effect of RMS energy Spread 10 F
- Page 181 and 182: 6.4.4BunchSelfInteractionviaCoheren
- Page 183 and 184: 100 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
- Page 185 and 186: Inthesecondseriesofrun,wewereableto
- Page 187 and 188: Conclusion Chapter7 Therecirculator
- Page 189 and 190: [2]Y.Shibata,T.Takahashi,T.Kanai,K.
- Page 191 and 192: [29]J.-C.Denard,C.Bochetta,G.Traomb
Slope(Mev/m)36.170633.741231.206727.9008 C1 X+RMS(mm)1.84343.28604.72586.1368 #zero.cav1 C0 XRMS(mm)0.87892.42823.93525.4319 z(mm) 1.16561.08731.00560.8991 3.70287.405711.108514.8114 0.39000.39010.39150.3913 2 3 4<br />
cases<strong>and</strong>wehaveestimatedthisvariationforthenormalizedslopeddzto0.54%/m. Table5.3:rmsbeamhorizontalsizesimulatedwiththeparmelaparticlepushingcodeonthe<br />
5.6.2NumericalSimulationoftheMethod energyrecoverytransferlineprolemeasurementstation.<br />
Wehavenumericallyperformedabunchlengthmeasurementforthenominalsettingsusingthe on<strong>and</strong>o.Itisnoticedthatthevariationoftheslopeduetospacechargeisthesameforallthe<br />
distance).ThebeamsizemeasuredattheOTRlocationareshowningure5.25,forthetwozerophasingvalues90deg,versusthenumberofzero-phasingcavities.Inthegurewealsosimulate bunchlengthof370mthecomputedbunchlengthisalwaysoverestimatedbyabout20m. statementthatwecouldunambiguouslydeconvolvetransversespacechargeeectcontributionto Ontheotherh<strong>and</strong>thecoecientC1isdependentonthenumberofcavities(infactonthedrift themeasurementwiththeparmelaspace-chargeroutineturnedotoverifyagainourprevious checktheconstancyofthemethod.Table1summarizestheresultsweobtained.Forthenominal relationsderivedabove.Wehavedonesuchmeasurementusing1,2,3,<strong>and</strong>4zerophasingcavitiesto<br />
thebeamsize.Ingure5.26,wepresentthebeamdistributioninthetransverseplanealongwith thehorizontalbeamprojection,inthecasewherefourcavitiesareusedaszerophasingcavities. 5.6.3ExperimentalResults Duringtheearlystageofthecommissioningofthelinac,weattemptedabunchlengthmeasurement usingthezerophasingmethod.Wetriedtozerophasedierentnumbersofcavities<strong>and</strong>sincethe bunchlengthwaslargerthanexpectedweneededonlytousetwocavities.<br />
phasespaceslopedE UsingEqn.(5.52)wegetanrmsbunchlengthestimateofz'488112m<strong>and</strong>thelongitudinal thesevaluesyieldXRMS'1:9mm<strong>and</strong>X+RMS'4:7mm. Thermssizeofthehorizontalprojectionofthebeamspots,presenteding.5.27,recordedduring thezerophasingexperimentarerespectively:0x'3:5mm,90 Duringourexperiment,thegradientofthetwozerophasingcavitieswassetto7:33MV=m,the C0denedinEqn.(5.49)isapproximatelyC0'7:19. totalenergyoftheincomingbeamwasestimatedtobe23.75MeV;withsuchvaluetheconstant<br />
optimized.Alsonotethattheerrorbaronthebunchlengthmeasurementisobtainedusingthe<br />
wasperformed:theinjectorbeamdynamicswasnotyetfullyunderstood<strong>and</strong>thesettingsnot predictedwithparmela.Thesediscrepancieswerenotrelevantatthetimethemeasurement dz'82MeV=m.Bothofthesevaluesareindisagreementwiththeparameters x'5:8mm<strong>and</strong>+90 x'4:0mm;