- Page 1 and 2:
HighBrightnessElectronBeamDiagnosti
- Page 3 and 4:
eratedupto48MeVpriortothelasingsyst
- Page 5 and 6:
IthanktheCEBAFmachineoperators,with
- Page 7 and 8:
3.4MeasurementoftheLongitudinalResp
- Page 9 and 10:
5.6ZerophasingTechniqueforBunchLeng
- Page 11 and 12:
ListofTables 3.2Comparisonofcoecien
- Page 13 and 14:
ListofFigures 1.1Comparisonoftheexp
- Page 15 and 16:
3.11Momentumcompactionandnonlinearm
- Page 17 and 18:
4.18Overviewofthephasespacesampling
- Page 19 and 20:
5.16Interferogrammeasuredfordierent
- Page 21 and 22:
6.10Comparisonofthermstransversehor
- Page 23 and 24:
Chapter1 UVdomainandareplannedtogen
- Page 25 and 26:
space-chargeinthelowenergyregime,an
- Page 27 and 28:
!Vjitsthevelocity,and!Xjisthepositi
- Page 29 and 30:
equation boundarybetweenvacuumandam
- Page 31 and 32:
10 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.
- Page 33 and 34:
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 E=10 MeV E=42 M
- Page 35 and 36:
00000000000000000000000000000000000
- Page 37 and 38:
harmonicwithproperchoiceoftheKvalue
- Page 39 and 40:
Bu(rms)0.28T ParameterValueUnit Nu
- Page 41:
2.7TheJeersonLabIRproject usedasexp
- Page 44 and 45:
Study TheFELdriveraccelerator:Latti
- Page 46 and 47:
ParameterValue x -0.178 x(m) 8.331
- Page 48 and 49:
Thepurposeofmeasuringthetransverser
- Page 50 and 51:
computedusingthelatticeset-upuseddu
- Page 52 and 53:
etatronexcitationaspicturedingure3.
- Page 54 and 55:
∆ x (mm), Corrector 0F00H ∆ x (
- Page 56 and 57:
1 0.5 0 spreadoftheparticlewassetto
- Page 58 and 59:
2 1 −5 −3 −1 1 3 5 k (m q −
- Page 60 and 61:
Experimentallythecalibrationcoecien
- Page 62 and 63:
tioned.FromthetransferfunctioninFig
- Page 64 and 65:
Pickup Experiment #2 #3 #4 Simulati
- Page 66 and 67:
Fromthesebothmeasurementitispossibl
- Page 68 and 69:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 70 and 71:
10 5 Sext. ON Figure3.20:Eectofthes
- Page 72 and 73:
spaceabeamthatconsistsofNparticles,
- Page 74 and 75:
Asforthegeometricemittanceonecanden
- Page 76 and 77:
(a) ceramic radiator beam x-wire be
- Page 78 and 79: and validundertheassumptionofaunifo
- Page 80 and 81: 1000 900 800 700 Figure4.4:Steadyst
- Page 82 and 83: Fraction of Beam enclosed within (%
- Page 84 and 85: 5 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 5 2 Foi
- Page 86 and 87: Actuator Inserts Foil and Mirror CI
- Page 88 and 89: shortterm,touseasbeamdensitymonitor
- Page 90 and 91: Alongwiththeseimplementedoperations
- Page 92 and 93: whereiistheerrorontheithbeamsizemea
- Page 94 and 95: Let'sassumethethinlensapproximation
- Page 96 and 97: obtainedviathestatisticalanalysis.T
- Page 98 and 99: 20 18 16 . 14 . 12 . Figure4.14:Rel
- Page 100 and 101: 100 10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 10 that
- Page 102 and 103: multislits mask (copper) Aluminum F
- Page 104: TheReductionoftheSpaceChargeconditi
- Page 107 and 108: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 109 and 110: Table4.7:Typicalsystematicerroronem
- Page 111 and 112: 180 8 160 6 Figure4.22:Anexampleof2
- Page 113 and 114: 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 Figure4.24:Emittanc
- Page 115 and 116: Characterization LongitudinalPhaseS
- Page 117 and 118: concentrateonthebeamparametersinthe
- Page 119 and 120: 1.1 1 mrad 0.9 5 mrad mainlyduetoth
- Page 121 and 122: Population Population 100000 90000
- Page 123 and 124: Theequation5.8yields: f()=jZ+1 11Xn
- Page 125 and 126: presentanoutlineofthisproofbelow,an
- Page 127: contrastintheCEBAFmachine,varyingas
- Page 131 and 132: Ε’ 2 B Mirror M 2 Ε2 Polarizer
- Page 133 and 134: FinallyitisinterestingtonotethatFou
- Page 135 and 136: Itsautocorrelationis:S(z)=8>:(1=w2)
- Page 137 and 138: drivelaserwhereasin(A),suchoperatio
- Page 139 and 140: expansionoftheBFFderivedinthischapt
- Page 141 and 142: Asarstapproximation,wecanestimatetr
- Page 143 and 144: errorpropagation8theoryappliedonEqn
- Page 145 and 146: inducedbyspacechargeisnotaconcernin
- Page 147 and 148: Golay Cell Signal (V) Golay Cell Si
- Page 149 and 150: Golay Cell Ouput (V) Golay Cell Oup
- Page 151 and 152: 150 100 5 4 Figure5.19:Energyspectr
- Page 153 and 154: Figure5.23:picturaleectoflongitudin
- Page 155 and 156: . .. .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .
- Page 157 and 158: σ x (m) x 10−3 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 5 1
- Page 159 and 160: BeamDynamicsStudies Chapter6 undula
- Page 161 and 162: x,y (mm) 6.0 4.8 3.6 2.4 1.2 x y 0.
- Page 163 and 164: Space Charge over Emittance Ratio (
- Page 165 and 166: numericalsolution[56].Thisapproxima
- Page 167 and 168: 0.03 . .... . .. ... . .. ..... . .
- Page 169 and 170: ε x (mm−mrad) Nominal 6 4 2 cryo
- Page 171 and 172: 2.2 2 1.8 Figure6.10:Comparisonofth
- Page 173 and 174: 6 4 2 Figure6.12:\R55"transfermapfo
- Page 175 and 176: 10 1 5 10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
- Page 177 and 178: EnergySpread(%) BunchLength(mm) Par
- Page 179 and 180:
15 Effect of RMS energy Spread 10 F
- Page 181 and 182:
6.4.4BunchSelfInteractionviaCoheren
- Page 183 and 184:
100 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
- Page 185 and 186:
Inthesecondseriesofrun,wewereableto
- Page 187 and 188:
Conclusion Chapter7 Therecirculator
- Page 189 and 190:
[2]Y.Shibata,T.Takahashi,T.Kanai,K.
- Page 191 and 192:
[29]J.-C.Denard,C.Bochetta,G.Traomb
- Page 193 and 194:
[65]B.C.Yunn,\ImpedancesintheIRFEL"
- Page 195 and 196:
TEM:transverseelectricmagnetic. TOF
- Page 197 and 198:
B.2Anoteonspacecharge Wedenetheslop
- Page 199 and 200:
B.3.3PARMELA FeaturesofJeersonLabVe
- Page 201 and 202:
Initialization MAIN Stop INPUT DECK
- Page 203 and 204:
C.0.6TheDispersionRelationsfor^S(!)
- Page 205 and 206:
have: Howeveritshouldbenotedthatweh
- Page 207:
FigureD.1:OverviewoftheRF-controlsy