- Page 1 and 2: HighBrightnessElectronBeamDiagnosti
- Page 3 and 4: eratedupto48MeVpriortothelasingsyst
- Page 5 and 6: IthanktheCEBAFmachineoperators,with
- Page 7 and 8: 3.4MeasurementoftheLongitudinalResp
- Page 9: 5.6ZerophasingTechniqueforBunchLeng
- Page 13 and 14: ListofFigures 1.1Comparisonoftheexp
- Page 15 and 16: 3.11Momentumcompactionandnonlinearm
- Page 17 and 18: 4.18Overviewofthephasespacesampling
- Page 19 and 20: 5.16Interferogrammeasuredfordierent
- Page 21 and 22: 6.10Comparisonofthermstransversehor
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter1 UVdomainandareplannedtogen
- Page 25 and 26: space-chargeinthelowenergyregime,an
- Page 27 and 28: !Vjitsthevelocity,and!Xjisthepositi
- Page 29 and 30: equation boundarybetweenvacuumandam
- Page 31 and 32: 10 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.
- Page 33 and 34: 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 E=10 MeV E=42 M
- Page 35 and 36: 00000000000000000000000000000000000
- Page 37 and 38: harmonicwithproperchoiceoftheKvalue
- Page 39 and 40: Bu(rms)0.28T ParameterValueUnit Nu
- Page 41: 2.7TheJeersonLabIRproject usedasexp
- Page 44 and 45: Study TheFELdriveraccelerator:Latti
- Page 46 and 47: ParameterValue x -0.178 x(m) 8.331
- Page 48 and 49: Thepurposeofmeasuringthetransverser
- Page 50 and 51: computedusingthelatticeset-upuseddu
- Page 52 and 53: etatronexcitationaspicturedingure3.
- Page 54 and 55: ∆ x (mm), Corrector 0F00H ∆ x (
- Page 56 and 57: 1 0.5 0 spreadoftheparticlewassetto
- Page 58 and 59: 2 1 −5 −3 −1 1 3 5 k (m q −
- Page 60 and 61:
Experimentallythecalibrationcoecien
- Page 62 and 63:
tioned.FromthetransferfunctioninFig
- Page 64 and 65:
Pickup Experiment #2 #3 #4 Simulati
- Page 66 and 67:
Fromthesebothmeasurementitispossibl
- Page 68 and 69:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 70 and 71:
10 5 Sext. ON Figure3.20:Eectofthes
- Page 72 and 73:
spaceabeamthatconsistsofNparticles,
- Page 74 and 75:
Asforthegeometricemittanceonecanden
- Page 76 and 77:
(a) ceramic radiator beam x-wire be
- Page 78 and 79:
and validundertheassumptionofaunifo
- Page 80 and 81:
1000 900 800 700 Figure4.4:Steadyst
- Page 82 and 83:
Fraction of Beam enclosed within (%
- Page 84 and 85:
5 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 5 2 Foi
- Page 86 and 87:
Actuator Inserts Foil and Mirror CI
- Page 88 and 89:
shortterm,touseasbeamdensitymonitor
- Page 90 and 91:
Alongwiththeseimplementedoperations
- Page 92 and 93:
whereiistheerrorontheithbeamsizemea
- Page 94 and 95:
Let'sassumethethinlensapproximation
- Page 96 and 97:
obtainedviathestatisticalanalysis.T
- Page 98 and 99:
20 18 16 . 14 . 12 . Figure4.14:Rel
- Page 100 and 101:
100 10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 10 that
- Page 102 and 103:
multislits mask (copper) Aluminum F
- Page 104:
TheReductionoftheSpaceChargeconditi
- Page 107 and 108:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 109 and 110:
Table4.7:Typicalsystematicerroronem
- Page 111 and 112:
180 8 160 6 Figure4.22:Anexampleof2
- Page 113 and 114:
4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 Figure4.24:Emittanc
- Page 115 and 116:
Characterization LongitudinalPhaseS
- Page 117 and 118:
concentrateonthebeamparametersinthe
- Page 119 and 120:
1.1 1 mrad 0.9 5 mrad mainlyduetoth
- Page 121 and 122:
Population Population 100000 90000
- Page 123 and 124:
Theequation5.8yields: f()=jZ+1 11Xn
- Page 125 and 126:
presentanoutlineofthisproofbelow,an
- Page 127 and 128:
contrastintheCEBAFmachine,varyingas
- Page 129 and 130:
1.5 1 correspondtothevarianceofveco
- Page 131 and 132:
Ε’ 2 B Mirror M 2 Ε2 Polarizer
- Page 133 and 134:
FinallyitisinterestingtonotethatFou
- Page 135 and 136:
Itsautocorrelationis:S(z)=8>:(1=w2)
- Page 137 and 138:
drivelaserwhereasin(A),suchoperatio
- Page 139 and 140:
expansionoftheBFFderivedinthischapt
- Page 141 and 142:
Asarstapproximation,wecanestimatetr
- Page 143 and 144:
errorpropagation8theoryappliedonEqn
- Page 145 and 146:
inducedbyspacechargeisnotaconcernin
- Page 147 and 148:
Golay Cell Signal (V) Golay Cell Si
- Page 149 and 150:
Golay Cell Ouput (V) Golay Cell Oup
- Page 151 and 152:
150 100 5 4 Figure5.19:Energyspectr
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure5.23:picturaleectoflongitudin
- Page 155 and 156:
. .. .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .
- Page 157 and 158:
σ x (m) x 10−3 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 5 1
- Page 159 and 160:
BeamDynamicsStudies Chapter6 undula
- Page 161 and 162:
x,y (mm) 6.0 4.8 3.6 2.4 1.2 x y 0.
- Page 163 and 164:
Space Charge over Emittance Ratio (
- Page 165 and 166:
numericalsolution[56].Thisapproxima
- Page 167 and 168:
0.03 . .... . .. ... . .. ..... . .
- Page 169 and 170:
ε x (mm−mrad) Nominal 6 4 2 cryo
- Page 171 and 172:
2.2 2 1.8 Figure6.10:Comparisonofth
- Page 173 and 174:
6 4 2 Figure6.12:\R55"transfermapfo
- Page 175 and 176:
10 1 5 10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
- Page 177 and 178:
EnergySpread(%) BunchLength(mm) Par
- Page 179 and 180:
15 Effect of RMS energy Spread 10 F
- Page 181 and 182:
6.4.4BunchSelfInteractionviaCoheren
- Page 183 and 184:
100 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
- Page 185 and 186:
Inthesecondseriesofrun,wewereableto
- Page 187 and 188:
Conclusion Chapter7 Therecirculator
- Page 189 and 190:
[2]Y.Shibata,T.Takahashi,T.Kanai,K.
- Page 191 and 192:
[29]J.-C.Denard,C.Bochetta,G.Traomb
- Page 193 and 194:
[65]B.C.Yunn,\ImpedancesintheIRFEL"
- Page 195 and 196:
TEM:transverseelectricmagnetic. TOF
- Page 197 and 198:
B.2Anoteonspacecharge Wedenetheslop
- Page 199 and 200:
B.3.3PARMELA FeaturesofJeersonLabVe
- Page 201 and 202:
Initialization MAIN Stop INPUT DECK
- Page 203 and 204:
C.0.6TheDispersionRelationsfor^S(!)
- Page 205 and 206:
have: Howeveritshouldbenotedthatweh
- Page 207:
FigureD.1:OverviewoftheRF-controlsy