04.08.2013 Views

Exploration for porphyry-style copper mineralisation near Llandeloy

Exploration for porphyry-style copper mineralisation near Llandeloy

Exploration for porphyry-style copper mineralisation near Llandeloy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX 5<br />

COMPUTER MODELLING OF AEROMAGNETiC AND<br />

RESISTIVITY DATA<br />

Aeromagne tic anomaly<br />

Three profiles from the aeromagnetic map (Fig. 7) were<br />

subjected to computer interpretation. The IGS Applied<br />

Geophysics Unit Program GAM2D2 was used (Lee, 1979).<br />

Profiles were taken from the contour map and sampled<br />

at 250 m intervals. The <strong>Llandeloy</strong> magnetic anomaly lies<br />

within the influence of two larger anomalies to the south:<br />

that due to the rocks in the core of the Hayscastle<br />

anticline, and that which extends along the south coast of<br />

Wales. The mutual interference of these anomalies made<br />

it impossible to define the regional field accurately. A<br />

value of 2nT km-1 was used though there are indications<br />

<strong>for</strong> a gradient of up to 5nT kmwl negative northward.<br />

At <strong>Llandeloy</strong>, the width and gentle flanks of the<br />

anomaly indicate a source extending to some depth. The<br />

base of the model was there<strong>for</strong>e set at 3 km, and the<br />

shape of the top surface and the susceptibility were<br />

adjusted to give the best possible fit of calculated to<br />

observed anomalies, while permitting the body to be<br />

exposed at the surface where appropriate. The<br />

susceptibility which gave the best fit within these<br />

limitations was 7.5 x 10-3 cgs units, which is close to the<br />

average value <strong>for</strong> acid to intermediate igneous rocks<br />

often given in the literature.<br />

The shape provided <strong>for</strong> the interpreted sources are all<br />

generally similar. A steep southern margin dips<br />

southwards at 60-70° from the surface just south of the<br />

maximum anomaly, The northern margin, corresponding<br />

at the surface with the steepest gradient, has dips as<br />

little as 20" and is there<strong>for</strong>e somewhat concave on two<br />

of the three profiles. The individual profiles and their<br />

interpretations are presented below (Figs. A5.1 to A5.5).<br />

For profile two, an iterative interpretation method was<br />

also used, which adjusts the length of prisms (extending<br />

to infinity at right angles to the paper) above a base,<br />

which was again assumed to be 3 km. The two bodies<br />

from the automatic iterative process and the manual<br />

polygon process correspond closely to one another.<br />

Thickness of conductive overburden<br />

An attempt was made to model the resistivity vertical<br />

profile at two points using data from the pseudosections.<br />

The dipole-dipole array is not well suited to this use<br />

however, because it is very sensitive to lateral<br />

variations, and because the relatively large dipole length<br />

makes <strong>for</strong> poor resolution of the shallower layers. The<br />

two sites chosen were 3700E/500N where borehole 3<br />

intersected over 20 m of lacustrine sediments, and<br />

4100E/675NY where the pseudosection indicated freedom<br />

from lateral effects. It was not possible to produce a<br />

realistic model <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mer site, suggesting that<br />

lateral variations are predominant here. The model <strong>for</strong><br />

the more easterly site is shown on Fig. A5.6. Even with<br />

this relatively thin overburden, the maximum measured<br />

resistivity will be only half the true resistivity of the<br />

bedrock,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!