04.08.2013 Views

Exploration for porphyry-style copper mineralisation near Llandeloy

Exploration for porphyry-style copper mineralisation near Llandeloy

Exploration for porphyry-style copper mineralisation near Llandeloy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

potash con tents whilst in K-feldspar altered rocks a If the results of the elements and ratios which most<br />

reduction in potash and increase in soda occurs.<br />

Comparison of surface and borehole rock results From<br />

the mineral exploration viewpoint the differences<br />

between the surface and borehole results are of great<br />

importance, because surface rock sampling gave no clear<br />

indication of the disseminated mineralisa tion intersected<br />

by the boreholes.<br />

Precise comparisons between the borehole and surface<br />

rock data are hampered by the lack of dioritic rocks in<br />

the surface samples, which in itself is significant. The<br />

closest chemical comparison that can be obtained is<br />

shown in Table 15. Alteration in the borehole samples is<br />

dominantly of weak potassic (biotite) type, overprinted<br />

with variable intensity by late stage propylitic<br />

alteration. In the surface samples alteration is very<br />

variable but frequently of quite intense propylitic type<br />

with quartz-chlorite-epidote-sericite assemblages<br />

developed.<br />

The two groups have virtually the same mean silica<br />

content and similar levels of most elements<br />

concentrated in basic rocks. Cu is the only element to<br />

show a great contrast in the two groups, with the lowest<br />

borehole result only slightly less than the highest level<br />

recorded in the surface rock group. The borehole samples<br />

may also contain higher levels of Pb, Zn, As, Ba and Rb<br />

and lower CaO, Na2O and Zr. As the medians indicate,<br />

some of these differences are greatly emphasised by the<br />

presence of one or two very high results and the<br />

differences may not be significant, but with the<br />

exception of Zr, they are changes which might be<br />

predicted when moving toward the centre of a <strong>porphyry</strong><br />

system and changing from propylitic to potassic<br />

alteration zones (e.g. Chaffee, 1976). The higher Zr<br />

content of the surface samples may be related to<br />

weathering.<br />

clearly show variation in the vicinity of the<br />

<strong>mineralisation</strong> (<strong>for</strong> example Cu, S, Cu/S, Na/K, Rb/Sr)<br />

are plotted out on a regional basis <strong>for</strong> the surface rocks<br />

no clear pattern emerges, and most variables show as<br />

great a variation within one outcrop as across the whole<br />

area. Only tenuous differences, such as the absence of<br />

very high soda in rocks collected in the vicinity of the<br />

<strong>mineralisation</strong>, can be discerned and it is concluded that<br />

no regional pattern useful <strong>for</strong> exploration purposes can<br />

be discovered from the surface rock sample results, even<br />

with the use of hindsight.<br />

Samples taken closest to the boreholes give no<br />

chemical clue to the <strong>near</strong>by <strong>mineralisation</strong>. This is<br />

surprising considering the extent of the <strong>mineralisation</strong><br />

and can only be attributed to chance. The quartz diorite<br />

sample taken from Hoilybush quarry (Table 2, no. 2) was<br />

collected within 200 rn of borehole 5 (tonalite at bedrock<br />

surface with 300 ppm Cu in drill mud) and contains the<br />

highest <strong>copper</strong> (46 ppm) and Fe (9.05%) content of any<br />

surface sample. It also contains low Zr and Na20, but<br />

these are features entirely consistent with the more<br />

basic composition of this lithology compared with other<br />

surface rocks. Only a slightly elevated Mo content<br />

suggests that it is close to disseminated <strong>mineralisation</strong>.<br />

It is there<strong>for</strong>e concluded that inadequate sampling<br />

caused by a lack of surface exposure, together with the<br />

masking effects of regional alteration and the<br />

complicated pattern of alteration associated with the<br />

disseminated <strong>mineralisation</strong>, are the reasons which have<br />

prevented the detection of extensive disseminated<br />

<strong>mineralisation</strong> by whole rock analysis of samples from<br />

available exposures in this area. It shows that in such an<br />

area this type of approach, used in isolation, could be a<br />

most misleading prospecting tool.<br />

Table 15 Comparison of surface and borehole analyses of igneous rocks<br />

M~O<br />

CaO<br />

Na2O<br />

K20<br />

p205<br />

Surface Rocks1<br />

Maximum Minimum Median Mean<br />

Major elements quoted as percent of oxide, trace elements as ppm.<br />

Borehole samples2<br />

Mean Median Minimum Maximum<br />

1 Twenty porphyritic m icrotonali tes from outcrops in the <strong>Llandeloy</strong>-Middle Mill area.<br />

2 Sixteen porphyritic microtonalites and tonalites from boreholes 1, 2 and 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!