Exploration for porphyry-style copper mineralisation near Llandeloy
Exploration for porphyry-style copper mineralisation near Llandeloy
Exploration for porphyry-style copper mineralisation near Llandeloy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
potash con tents whilst in K-feldspar altered rocks a If the results of the elements and ratios which most<br />
reduction in potash and increase in soda occurs.<br />
Comparison of surface and borehole rock results From<br />
the mineral exploration viewpoint the differences<br />
between the surface and borehole results are of great<br />
importance, because surface rock sampling gave no clear<br />
indication of the disseminated mineralisa tion intersected<br />
by the boreholes.<br />
Precise comparisons between the borehole and surface<br />
rock data are hampered by the lack of dioritic rocks in<br />
the surface samples, which in itself is significant. The<br />
closest chemical comparison that can be obtained is<br />
shown in Table 15. Alteration in the borehole samples is<br />
dominantly of weak potassic (biotite) type, overprinted<br />
with variable intensity by late stage propylitic<br />
alteration. In the surface samples alteration is very<br />
variable but frequently of quite intense propylitic type<br />
with quartz-chlorite-epidote-sericite assemblages<br />
developed.<br />
The two groups have virtually the same mean silica<br />
content and similar levels of most elements<br />
concentrated in basic rocks. Cu is the only element to<br />
show a great contrast in the two groups, with the lowest<br />
borehole result only slightly less than the highest level<br />
recorded in the surface rock group. The borehole samples<br />
may also contain higher levels of Pb, Zn, As, Ba and Rb<br />
and lower CaO, Na2O and Zr. As the medians indicate,<br />
some of these differences are greatly emphasised by the<br />
presence of one or two very high results and the<br />
differences may not be significant, but with the<br />
exception of Zr, they are changes which might be<br />
predicted when moving toward the centre of a <strong>porphyry</strong><br />
system and changing from propylitic to potassic<br />
alteration zones (e.g. Chaffee, 1976). The higher Zr<br />
content of the surface samples may be related to<br />
weathering.<br />
clearly show variation in the vicinity of the<br />
<strong>mineralisation</strong> (<strong>for</strong> example Cu, S, Cu/S, Na/K, Rb/Sr)<br />
are plotted out on a regional basis <strong>for</strong> the surface rocks<br />
no clear pattern emerges, and most variables show as<br />
great a variation within one outcrop as across the whole<br />
area. Only tenuous differences, such as the absence of<br />
very high soda in rocks collected in the vicinity of the<br />
<strong>mineralisation</strong>, can be discerned and it is concluded that<br />
no regional pattern useful <strong>for</strong> exploration purposes can<br />
be discovered from the surface rock sample results, even<br />
with the use of hindsight.<br />
Samples taken closest to the boreholes give no<br />
chemical clue to the <strong>near</strong>by <strong>mineralisation</strong>. This is<br />
surprising considering the extent of the <strong>mineralisation</strong><br />
and can only be attributed to chance. The quartz diorite<br />
sample taken from Hoilybush quarry (Table 2, no. 2) was<br />
collected within 200 rn of borehole 5 (tonalite at bedrock<br />
surface with 300 ppm Cu in drill mud) and contains the<br />
highest <strong>copper</strong> (46 ppm) and Fe (9.05%) content of any<br />
surface sample. It also contains low Zr and Na20, but<br />
these are features entirely consistent with the more<br />
basic composition of this lithology compared with other<br />
surface rocks. Only a slightly elevated Mo content<br />
suggests that it is close to disseminated <strong>mineralisation</strong>.<br />
It is there<strong>for</strong>e concluded that inadequate sampling<br />
caused by a lack of surface exposure, together with the<br />
masking effects of regional alteration and the<br />
complicated pattern of alteration associated with the<br />
disseminated <strong>mineralisation</strong>, are the reasons which have<br />
prevented the detection of extensive disseminated<br />
<strong>mineralisation</strong> by whole rock analysis of samples from<br />
available exposures in this area. It shows that in such an<br />
area this type of approach, used in isolation, could be a<br />
most misleading prospecting tool.<br />
Table 15 Comparison of surface and borehole analyses of igneous rocks<br />
M~O<br />
CaO<br />
Na2O<br />
K20<br />
p205<br />
Surface Rocks1<br />
Maximum Minimum Median Mean<br />
Major elements quoted as percent of oxide, trace elements as ppm.<br />
Borehole samples2<br />
Mean Median Minimum Maximum<br />
1 Twenty porphyritic m icrotonali tes from outcrops in the <strong>Llandeloy</strong>-Middle Mill area.<br />
2 Sixteen porphyritic microtonalites and tonalites from boreholes 1, 2 and 5.