2-D Niblett-Bostick magnetotelluric inversion - MTNet
2-D Niblett-Bostick magnetotelluric inversion - MTNet
2-D Niblett-Bostick magnetotelluric inversion - MTNet
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
J. RODRÍGUEZ et al. 2-D <strong>Niblett</strong>-<strong>Bostick</strong><br />
80% if the algorithm could not accommodate the static<br />
shift into the structure. As can be observed in Fig. 9B, the<br />
model for the perturbed data presents basically the same<br />
broad features of the two main conductive anomalies. The<br />
static shift is accommodated mainly by means of extra<br />
variations of conductivity at shallow depths, as expected.<br />
This is highlighted in Fig. 10 that shows a zoom view of<br />
the first 5 km of the model. The static shift surfaces as high<br />
frequency lateral features, over the already highly variable<br />
top conductive surface layer. Similar results, with somewhat<br />
broader features, are obtained with a larger window. This<br />
is illustrated in Fig. 11 for the complete model, with and<br />
without extra static contamination.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The present application builds on the well-known<br />
<strong>Niblett</strong>-<strong>Bostick</strong> approximation for 1-D soundings. Our<br />
intention has been to show that such an approximation is<br />
viable in higher dimensions, both on theoretical and practical<br />
grounds. Most quantities involved are analytical as far as<br />
they can be; the use of series and parallel impedances avoid<br />
elaborated processing of the data prior to interpretation<br />
and the RHANN square window approach allows for the<br />
computation of averages in a simple fashion. We feel that<br />
these features can make the present approximation a fair<br />
extension of the popular <strong>Niblett</strong>-<strong>Bostick</strong> transformation.<br />
Parallel impedances, in particular, are recommended as<br />
standard practice for the approximation.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
We would like to thank Colin Farquharson and Josef Pek for<br />
their comments and suggestions for improving the manuscript.<br />
Joel Rodríguez-Ramírez thanks the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y<br />
Tecnología México (CONACYT) for funding his doctoral studies<br />
(scholarship #94748). We also thank CONACYT for Grant #47922.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Anderson, W.L., 1975. Improved digital filters for evaluating<br />
Fourier and Hankel transform integrals. United States<br />
Geological Survey Report USGS-GD-75-012., 223 pp.<br />
Backus, G.E., Gilbert, J.F., 1968. The resolving power of gross<br />
earth data. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical<br />
Society, 16, 169-205.<br />
Backus, G.E., Gilbert, J.F., 1970. Uniqueness in the <strong>inversion</strong> of<br />
inaccurate gross earth data. Philosophical Transactions of the<br />
Royal Society of London, A266, 123-192.<br />
Bailey, R.C., 1970. Inversion of the geomagnetic induction<br />
problem. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A315,<br />
185-194.<br />
Geologica Acta, 8(1), 15-30 (2010)<br />
DOI: 10.1344/105.000001513<br />
Boerner, D.E., Holladay, J.S., 1990. Approximate Fréchet<br />
derivatives in inductive electromagnetic soundings.<br />
Geophysics, 55, 1589-1595.<br />
<strong>Bostick</strong>, F.X., 1977. A simple almost exact method of<br />
<strong>magnetotelluric</strong> analysis. In: Ward, S. (ed.). Workshop on<br />
Electrical Methods in Geothermal Exploration. United States<br />
Geological Survey, Contract Nº. 14080001-G-359, 174-183.<br />
Brunner, I., Friedel, S., Jacobs F., Danckwardt, E., 2003.<br />
Investigation of a tertiary maar structure using threedimensional<br />
resistivity imaging. Geophysical Journal<br />
International, 136, 771-780.<br />
Cagniard, L., 1953. Basic theory of the magneto-telluric method<br />
of geophysical prospecting. Geophysics, 18, 605-635.<br />
Christensen, N.B., 1997. Electromagnetic subsurface imaging<br />
- A case for an adaptive Born approximation. Surveys in<br />
Geophysics, 18, 441-510.<br />
De Groot-Hedlin, C.D., Constable, S.C., 1990. Occam’s<br />
<strong>inversion</strong> to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from<br />
<strong>magnetotelluric</strong> data. Geophysics, 55, 1613-1624.<br />
Esparza, F.J., 1991. Sufficiency of Maxwell’s equations in relation<br />
with electromagnetic inverse problems. Doctoral thesis.<br />
México, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación<br />
Superior de Ensenada, 90 pp.<br />
Esparza, F.J., Gómez-Treviño, E., 1996. Inversion of<br />
<strong>magnetotelluric</strong> soundings using a new integral form of the<br />
induction equation. Geophysical Journal International, 127,<br />
452-460.<br />
Friedel, S., 2003. Resolution, stability and efficiency of resistivity<br />
tomography estimated from a generalized inverse approach.<br />
Geophysical Journal International, 153, 305-316.<br />
Gómez-Treviño, E., 1987a. Nonlinear integral equations for<br />
electromagnetic inverse problems. Geophysics, 52, 1297-<br />
1302.<br />
Gómez-Treviño, E., 1987b. A simple sensitivity analysis of<br />
time-domain and frequency-domain electromagnetic<br />
measurements. Geophysics, 52, 1418-1423.<br />
Gómez-Treviño, E., 1996. Approximate depth averages of<br />
electrical conductivity from surface <strong>magnetotelluric</strong> data.<br />
Geophysical Journal International, 127, 762-772.<br />
Hidalgo, H., Gómez-Treviño, E., 1996. Application of constructive<br />
learning algorithms to the inverse problem. Institute of<br />
Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Transactions on<br />
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 34, 874-885.<br />
Hohmann, G.W., 1971. Electromagnetic Scattering by conductors<br />
in the earth near a line source of current. Geophysics, 36, 101-<br />
131.<br />
Hopfield, J.J., 1982. Neural Networks and physical systems with<br />
emergent collective computational abilities. United States of<br />
America, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,<br />
79, 2554-2558.<br />
Ising, E., 1925. Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus.<br />
Zeitschrift für Physik, 31, 253-258.<br />
Jones, A.G., 1983. On the the equivalence on the <strong>Niblett</strong> and<br />
<strong>Bostick</strong> transformation in the <strong>magnetotelluric</strong> method.<br />
Journal of Geophysics, 53, 72-73.<br />
25