P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

mtnet.dias.ie
from mtnet.dias.ie More from this publisher
04.08.2013 Views

A. Appendix A.4. Auxiliary figures of the Tajo Basin subsurface investigation A.4.1. Responses for crustal inversion model This Section contains responses for the PICASSO Phase I stations and the isotropic 2D subsurface model for the Tajo Basin crust shown in Figure 10.6. Responses are displayed in terms of apparent resistivity and impedance phase values for periods ≤ 10 3 s that are related to the crustal depth range (cf. Sec. 10.1). TE mode data are shown on the lefthand side, whereas TM mode data are shown on the right-hand side of each figure. Also shown are the RMS misfit values for both modes at the bottom of each figure as well as the average RMS misfit at the top of each figure. 312 ρ TE(Ω−m) φ TE(degrees) RMS TE 10 2 10 1 0 −30 −60 1.44 −90 1.08 0.72 0.36 10 −2 10 −1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Site: pic001 RMS: 0.835134257769307 ρ TM(Ω−m) φ TM(degrees) RMS TM 10 1 0 −30 −60 1.76 −90 1.32 0.88 0.44 TE TM Orig Model 10 −2 10 −1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Fig. A.19.: Comparison of observed data for station pic001 and the related model response for the model shown in Figure 10.6.

ρ TE(Ω−m) φ TE(degrees) RMS TE 10 2 0 −30 −60 −90 1.8 1.2 0.6 A.4. Auxiliary figures of the Tajo Basin subsurface investigation 0.0 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 Site: pic002 RMS: 1.10800695361517 ρ TM(Ω−m) φ TM(degrees) RMS TM 10 2 10 1 0 −30 −60 −90 2.58 1.72 0.86 0.00 TE TM Orig Model 10 −2 10 −1 10 0 10 1 10 2 Fig. A.20.: Comparison of observed data for station pic002 and the related model response for the model shown in Figure 10.6. ρ TE(Ω−m) φ TE(degrees) RMS TE 10 2 0 −30 −60 −90 0.84 0.56 0.28 0.00 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 Site: pic003 RMS: 0.493181745536071 ρ TM(Ω−m) φ TM(degrees) RMS TM 10 2 10 1 0 −30 −60 −90 0.75 0.50 0.25 TE TM Orig Model 0.00 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 Fig. A.21.: Comparison of observed data for station pic003 and the related model response for the model shown in Figure 10.6. 313

ρ TE(Ω−m)<br />

φ TE(degrees)<br />

RMS TE<br />

10 2<br />

0<br />

−30<br />

−60<br />

−90<br />

1.8<br />

1.2<br />

0.6<br />

A.4. Auxiliary figures of the Tajo Basin subsurface investigation<br />

0.0<br />

10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 Site: pic002 RMS: 1.10800695361517<br />

ρ TM(Ω−m)<br />

φ TM(degrees)<br />

RMS TM<br />

10 2<br />

10 1<br />

0<br />

−30<br />

−60<br />

−90<br />

2.58<br />

1.72<br />

0.86<br />

0.00<br />

TE TM Orig Model<br />

10 −2 10 −1 10 0 10 1 10 2<br />

Fig. A.20.: Comparison of observed data for station pic002 and the related model response for the model shown in Figure 10.6.<br />

ρ TE(Ω−m)<br />

φ TE(degrees)<br />

RMS TE<br />

10 2<br />

0<br />

−30<br />

−60<br />

−90<br />

0.84<br />

0.56<br />

0.28<br />

0.00<br />

10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 Site: pic003 RMS: 0.493181745536071<br />

ρ TM(Ω−m)<br />

φ TM(degrees)<br />

RMS TM<br />

10 2<br />

10 1<br />

0<br />

−30<br />

−60<br />

−90<br />

0.75<br />

0.50<br />

0.25<br />

TE TM Orig Model<br />

0.00<br />

10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 Fig. A.21.: Comparison of observed data for station pic003 and the related model response for the model shown in Figure 10.6.<br />

313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!