04.08.2013 Views

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A.2.3. Jones Catechism<br />

A.2. Auxiliary information regarding inversion processes<br />

The term Jones Catechism, named after Alan G. Jones, describes a sequence of inversion<br />

steps following the approach to “bring in structure slowly”. The Catechism pursues the<br />

plan to reproduce the observed response by a minimum numbers of features with moderate<br />

conductivity values (cf. Occam’s razor). This approach is motivated by the circumstance<br />

that MT inversion models are non-unique and that the MT method is most sensitive to<br />

the conductance of the subsurface, rather than to the conductivity of a specific region.<br />

This means that localised features with high conductivity can yield, to a certain degree,<br />

similar responses than a more extensive feature with lower conductivity (cf. Sec. 5).<br />

In MT inversion, the Jones Catechism is implemented by starting the inversion process<br />

with the phase of the TM mode, the parameter most sensitive to lateral boundaries and<br />

unaffected by static shift, before subsequently introducing the phase of the TE mode and<br />

apparent resistivities. The order of the inversion steps is suited to fit the regularisation of<br />

nonlinear conjugate gradient (NLCG) inversion (Sec. 6.3), implemented among other in<br />

the WinGLink software package [WinGLink, 2005].<br />

During inversion of the PICASSO Phase I dataset the Jones Catechism is realised by<br />

initially inverting only for the TM mode with a moderate error floor for the phase and for<br />

a maximum error floor for the apparent resistivity, making the latter virtually irrelevant.<br />

Once the RMS misfit approaches a minimum value, TE mode phase data are added (again<br />

by assigning a maximum error floor to the apparent resistivity data). This is followed by<br />

further introducing first the apparent resistivity of the TM mode and thereafter of the TE<br />

mode by lowering the respective error floors. Once all modes are introduced, error floors<br />

for the parameters are subsequently reduced to a minimum, wherein values are a trade-off<br />

between error floor and RMS misfit of the model (cf. Sec. 10).<br />

293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!