04.08.2013 Views

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A.2.2. Oblique strike intricacy<br />

A.2. Auxiliary information regarding inversion processes<br />

The problematic in using locally true resistivity values stems from the oblique geoelectric<br />

strike direction at crust and mantle depths. For any point on the model, a projection of<br />

structures along the mantle strike direction result in a homogeneous halfspace, due to<br />

orthogonality of the strike direction in the two depth regions. To illustrate this point a<br />

gedankenexperiment is conducted here, using Figure A.3 to illustrate the steps within:<br />

consider a projection of recording stations (grey) onto a profile orthogonal to the crustal<br />

strike direction (black) as shown in plot ‘a’ of Figure A.3. For that profile an inversion for<br />

crustal structures can be carried out using short-period data of the projected stations. The<br />

inversion result shown in plot ‘b’ of Figure A.3 comprises a very simple 2D subsurface<br />

model for the crust (more complex models are certainly possible, but this model is chosen<br />

to illustrate the issues of oblique strike direction even for a very simple subsurface case).<br />

Plot ‘c’ in Figure A.3 displays the same model together with the locations of recording<br />

sites and projected stations in 3D view for clearness. Plot ‘d’ in Figure A.3 illustrates<br />

the projection of the recording stations onto four profiles that are orthogonal to the strike<br />

direction at mantle depth (any other profile parallel to the the profiles 1 to 4 is valid as well,<br />

but for the sake of simplicity the display is limited to those four profiles). The location<br />

of the four profiles orthogonal to the mantle strike are shown on top of the crustal model<br />

in plot ‘d’ in Figure A.3 with dashed-dotted lines indicating the strike direction at mantle<br />

depths. Each of the four projected profiles is located on top of a crustal region that is only<br />

valid for one of the stations (grey-coloured station in plot ‘e’ in Figure A.3). Certainly,<br />

the true subsurface between each station is defined by the crustal model, but the effects<br />

of vertical interfaces on the TE and TM mode are interchanged due to the swapping of<br />

transverse and parallel components at crustal and mantle depth.<br />

291

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!