04.08.2013 Views

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.8. Analysis of vertical magnetic transfer function data<br />

Fig. 9.15.: Real induction vectors (Parkinson convention) for the Tajo Basin subsurface denoted by red arrows; the arrows are plotted<br />

for a projection with North located to the top and East located to the right of this figure. The dashed blue lines indicates an area of<br />

magnitude greater one (cf. Fig. 9.14), see text for further details.<br />

profile (Fig. 9.15). Since real induction vectors are orthogonal to electric resistivity interfaces,<br />

presuming no prevailing disturbance, this relates to a geoelectric strike direction<br />

between N100W and N130W. This direction is similar to the results of the strike analysis<br />

for the crustal region using the MT impedance tensor (cf. Sec. 9.6.1). Deviations from<br />

these directions are observed particularly for a) data in the area of disturbance, discussed<br />

in the previous paragraph, for b) longest-period data of most stations, and for c) shorter<br />

period data of the southernmost station (pic019). Anomalies a and b are probably caused<br />

by low signal-to-noise ratio, wherein the long-period deviation (b) could be due to low<br />

resolution and related disturbance of the data by small amount of noise. The deviation<br />

in the area of exceedingly high magnitude (a) most likely originates from disturbances<br />

generated by the nearby DC railway line. The deviation at station pic019 (c) is probably<br />

related to a conductive region to the west; inversion of the MT data should provide further<br />

information about this feature.<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!