P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS
P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS
9. Data collection and processing constraint at greater depth given their limited period range and larger errors. The multistrike analysis yields directions of N30.0E and N29.4E (0.8 av. RMS misfit) for the Tajo Basin of the lithospheric-mantle with depth down to 100 km and 120 km, respectively; as well as a direction of N20.2E (0.7 av. RMS misfit) for the asthenosphere. The significantly different values indicate that the geoelectric strike below the Tajo Basin varies between lithospheric and asthenospheric parts of the mantle, and that the LAB is likely to be found at depth below 120 km. The latter assumption is based on the fact that the observed strike direction is similar for the depth ranges with and without the interval 100 – 120 km, indicating that this interval agrees with structures of the region above. This observation, however, is not well constraint since structures for such a thin layer at this depth are not well resolved. The true strike directions for the lithosphericmantle can be assumed to possess an orientation between 0 and 90 degrees, rather than the orthogonal direction, considering the results of seismic tomography studies in this regions, indicating a NE-SW geological strike (cf. Section 7.3.2). Lithospheric depth Finally, despite indications for different strike directions of crust and mantle by previous analyses and seismic results (cf. Sec. 7.3.2), it is tested whether a reasonable, common strike direction can be found for the depth range spanning from intermediate crust to LAB. The multi-strike analysis yields a direction of N37.2E (1.1 av. RMS misfit) and N35.3E (1.1 av. RMS misfit) for the Tajo Basin lithosphere with an assumed LAB depth of 100 km and 120 km respectively; coincident with a range of low RMS misfit in the main plot of Figure 9.11. For the whole profile a direction of N15.0E is determined, which however does not fit with the RMS distribution of stations in the Betic Cordillera. In principle, a common geoelectric strike direction of intermediate crust, lower crust and lithospheric-mantle can be found: However, certain aspects favour a separate treatment of the two regions, namely the higher average RMS misfit for the combined range indicating an inferior fit of local structures and, more importantly, results of the other geophysical methods that are in favour of two different strike directions at crust and mantle depths (cf. Sec. 7.3.2). Conclusions Thorough investigation of the geoelectric strike direction beneath the PICASSO Phase I profile presented in the previous paragraphs results in the following conclusions: 216 • Strike characteristics differ between the southern region of the profile associated with the Betic Cordillera, and the northern region associated with the Tajo Basin. The Betic Cordillera exhibits complex subsurface structures for the whole depth range for which no distinct geoelectric strike direction can be identified, whereas for the Tajo Basin common geoelectric strike directions can be fitted to the majority of the different depth layers.
0 km 10 km 30 km 100 km 300 km Depth range Depth: 12 – 100 km (lithosphere) 90 75 60 45 30 15 0 pic041 pic040 pic037 pic035 pic033 pic031 9.6. Compensating for distortion of the impedance tensor pic029 pic027 pic025 Depth: 12 – 120 km (lithosphere) 90 75 60 45 30 15 0 pic041 pic040 pic037 pic035 pic033 pic031 Betic Cordillera pic029 pic027 pic025 pic023 pic023 CIZ pic022 pic022 pic020 pic020 pic019 pic019 pic017 pic017 pic015 pic015 Multi-strike (Av. RMS-misfit in brackets) pic013 pic013 pic011 pic011 pic009 pic009 pic007 Multi-strike (Av. RMS-misfit in brackets) pic007 Tajo Basin pic006 pic006 All stations Tajo Basin 15.0 (1.2) 37.2 (1.1) pic005 pic005 pic004 pic004 pic003 pic003 pic002 All stations Tajo Basin 15.0 (1.2) 35.9 (1.1) Fig. 9.11.: RMS misfit for different geoelectric strike directions of stations recorded during PICASSO Phase I, using data in the Niblett-Bostick depth ranges 12 – 100 and 12 – 120 km; shown in the inset. Empty spaces are due to lack of data for this depth range at the respective station. Also shown in the top right corner is the optimal common geoelectric strike direction clockwise from North calculated for all stations and for stations in the Tajo Basin only; indicated by dashed and dotted white lines in the main plot, respectively. Assignment of stations to the different geological regions, displayed on the bottom of the plot, is based on their location in respect to geological units of the USGS EnVision map for Europe (Fig. 9.1), CIZ: Central Iberian Zone, part of the Iberian Massif. See text for further details. • Beneath the Tajo Basin, four groups of layers are derived according to their preferential geoelectric strike direction, namely upper crust (≤ 10 km), combined intermediate and lower crust (12 - 30 km), lithospheric-mantle (35 - 120 km), and asthenosphere (≥ 140 km). Among these, structures in the upper crust are found to be relatively heterogeneous, and structures of the asthenosphere are less constrained due to their greater depth. • Layers in the Tajo Basin subsurface can be grouped into two bands: crustal layers with a geoelectric strike direction of N40.9W, determined for the structures of the intermediate and lower crust; and mantle layers with a geoelectric strike direction of N29.4E, associated with the lithospheric-mantle. The strike direction of the lithospheric-mantle is similar to the direction of the asthenosphere (N20.2E) and can be expected to provide a suitable estimation for the upper mantle given that constraints on the asthenosphere are weaker due to decreasing resolution of the MT method with depth. • The determined geoelectric strike direction at mantle depth is not in agreement with derived plate motion of Eurasia (at Long: 3W, Lat: 40N), i.e. N50.6E (2.5 cm/a) [Argus and Gordon, 1991] and N50.5E (2.4 cm/a) [De Mets et al., 1994]. It is therefore unlikely that the mantle geoelectric strike direction originates from processes in connection with relative plate motion. Thus, it is unlikely that effects of anisotropic structures, caused by lattice preferred orientation from drag along alignment pic002 pic001 pic001 RMS misfit 4 3 2 1 0 RMS misfit 4 3 2 1 0 217
- Page 202 and 203: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 205 and 206: Recovering a synthetic 3D subsurfac
- Page 207 and 208: direction direction Depth: 12 - 30
- Page 209 and 210: 8.2. Generating synthetic 3D model
- Page 211 and 212: Distance from the centre of the mes
- Page 213 and 214: 3D N45W 3D-crust TE Rho TE Phi Peri
- Page 215 and 216: 8.3. Inversion of 3D model data sch
- Page 217 and 218: Model variation RMS misfit Optimal
- Page 219 and 220: Profile: 3D-crust (TM-only) Depth (
- Page 221 and 222: Parameter Value 8.3. Inversion of 3
- Page 223 and 224: Depth (km) 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10
- Page 225 and 226: Depth (km) 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10
- Page 227 and 228: Step 1: Isotropic 2D inversion Step
- Page 229 and 230: 8.3. Inversion of 3D model data par
- Page 231 and 232: 8.4. Summary and conclusions bution
- Page 233 and 234: Regularisation order Smoothing para
- Page 235 and 236: S N 1% 0 Depth (km) 3% Depth (km) 1
- Page 237 and 238: 9.1. Profile location Data collecti
- Page 239 and 240: Location (degrees) Recording period
- Page 241 and 242: Geological region Stations Geologic
- Page 243 and 244: 9.4. Segregation of data acquired w
- Page 245 and 246: Phase (degrees) 135 90 45 0 Z xy -4
- Page 247 and 248: 0 km 10 km 30 km 100 km 300 km Dept
- Page 249 and 250: 0 km 10 km 30 km 100 km 300 km Dept
- Page 251: 0 km 10 km 30 km 100 km 300 km Dept
- Page 255 and 256: Pseudo-sections crustal strike dire
- Page 257 and 258: 9.8. Analysis of vertical magnetic
- Page 259: 9.8. Analysis of vertical magnetic
- Page 262 and 263: 10. Data inversion WinGLink softwar
- Page 264 and 265: a (horizontal smoothing) 10. Data i
- Page 266 and 267: 10. Data inversion Short period ran
- Page 268 and 269: 10. Data inversion TM+TE Depth (km)
- Page 270 and 271: 10. Data inversion (a) Constrained
- Page 272 and 273: 10. Data inversion the model into u
- Page 274 and 275: 10. Data inversion Depth (km) S N 0
- Page 276 and 277: Depth (km) 10. Data inversion S N 0
- Page 278 and 279: 10. Data inversion Group velocity m
- Page 280 and 281: 10. Data inversion ductivity of thi
- Page 282 and 283: 10. Data inversion Shtrikman upper
- Page 284 and 285: 10. Data inversion TM+TE Depth (km)
- Page 286 and 287: 10. Data inversion TM+TE Depth (km)
- Page 288 and 289: 10. Data inversion in the lithosphe
- Page 290 and 291: 10. Data inversion isotropic 2D lay
- Page 292 and 293: 10. Data inversion Depth (km) Depth
- Page 294 and 295: 10. Data inversion Depth (km) Depth
- Page 296 and 297: 10. Data inversion Depth (km) Depth
- Page 298 and 299: 10. Data inversion tigation is usua
- Page 300 and 301: Depth (km) Depth (km) 10. Data inve
9. Data collection and processing<br />
constraint at greater depth given their limited period range and larger errors. The multistrike<br />
analysis yields directions of N30.0E and N29.4E (0.8 av. RMS misfit) for the Tajo<br />
Basin of the lithospheric-mantle with depth down to 100 km and 120 km, respectively; as<br />
well as a direction of N20.2E (0.7 av. RMS misfit) for the asthenosphere.<br />
The significantly different values indicate that the geoelectric strike below the Tajo<br />
Basin varies between lithospheric and asthenospheric parts of the mantle, and that the<br />
LAB is likely to be found at depth below 120 km. The latter assumption is based on the<br />
fact that the observed strike direction is similar for the depth ranges with and without<br />
the interval 100 – 120 km, indicating that this interval agrees with structures of the region<br />
above. This observation, however, is not well constraint since structures for such a thin<br />
layer at this depth are not well resolved. The true strike directions for the lithosphericmantle<br />
can be assumed to possess an orientation between 0 and 90 degrees, rather than<br />
the orthogonal direction, considering the results of seismic tomography studies in this<br />
regions, indicating a NE-SW geological strike (cf. Section 7.3.2).<br />
Lithospheric depth<br />
Finally, despite indications for different strike directions of crust and mantle by previous<br />
analyses and seismic results (cf. Sec. 7.3.2), it is tested whether a reasonable, common<br />
strike direction can be found for the depth range spanning from intermediate crust to<br />
LAB. The multi-strike analysis yields a direction of N37.2E (1.1 av. RMS misfit) and<br />
N35.3E (1.1 av. RMS misfit) for the Tajo Basin lithosphere with an assumed LAB depth<br />
of 100 km and 120 km respectively; coincident with a range of low RMS misfit in the<br />
main plot of Figure 9.11. For the whole profile a direction of N15.0E is determined,<br />
which however does not fit with the RMS distribution of stations in the Betic Cordillera.<br />
In principle, a common geoelectric strike direction of intermediate crust, lower crust and<br />
lithospheric-mantle can be found: However, certain aspects favour a separate treatment of<br />
the two regions, namely the higher average RMS misfit for the combined range indicating<br />
an inferior fit of local structures and, more importantly, results of the other geophysical<br />
methods that are in favour of two different strike directions at crust and mantle depths (cf.<br />
Sec. 7.3.2).<br />
Conclusions<br />
Thorough investigation of the geoelectric strike direction beneath the PICASSO Phase I<br />
profile presented in the previous paragraphs results in the following conclusions:<br />
216<br />
• Strike characteristics differ between the southern region of the profile associated<br />
with the Betic Cordillera, and the northern region associated with the Tajo Basin.<br />
The Betic Cordillera exhibits complex subsurface structures for the whole depth<br />
range for which no distinct geoelectric strike direction can be identified, whereas<br />
for the Tajo Basin common geoelectric strike directions can be fitted to the majority<br />
of the different depth layers.