P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS
P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS
7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula crystalline rocks, whereas seismic and xenolith studies indicate that the middle and lower crust consist of felsic intrusives and granulites, respectively. Since no seismic activity was recorded below the middle crust, it is likely that the lower crust, is an incompetent, ductile layer between the mantle and the other crustal layers. Faults with an approximately N45W direction intersect the PICASSO Phase I profile in the proximity of stations pic005, pic009, and pic013, potentially yielding a respective geoelectric strike direction in MT data of shorter periods. Material interfaces at crustal depth below the Tajo Basin, as interred from seismic studies, coincide with the borders of the Betic Cordillera and the Iberian Range. The respective ENE-WSW and NW-SE orientation of the interfaces indicate different geoelectric strike directions for the northern and southern parts of the PICASSO Phase I profile (cf. Sec. 9.6.1). Furthermore, since the low velocity feature, occurring slightly north of the Betic Cordillera, reaches down to at least 200 km, whereas the anomaly associated with the Iberian Range cannot be observed at depths greater than 53 km, it is likely that the geoelectric strike direction in the Tajo Basin below the PICASSO Phase I profile will also change with depth. Seismic tomography studies further derive low velocity structures at crustal depth beneath Betic Cordillera and Alboran Sea, in the mid- and lower crust beneath in the Campo de Montiel region, and an extensive low velocity region located approximately 50 km to 350 km beneath the Tajo Basin. Different settings could explain such decreases of velocity, e.g. increased temperature, different chemistry, and the presence of partial melt or fluids. Investigation of the electric conductivity distribution in this region will add further constraints on this issue and might help to better understand the geological setting and the related tectonic evolution. In addition, results of the PICASSO Phase I investigation can help to reassess the stratigraphy of Tajo Basin and Betic Cordillera as deduced from seismic reflection and refraction studies. Formation of proposed Miocene folding and the depth extend of faults in the Tajo Basin may also be evaluated using results of this study. Further, the currently unknown eastward extent of the Iberian Massif beneath the Tajo Basin, in the region of the Manchega Plain, can be investigated given the significantly higher resistivity of the Iberian Massif. At deeper regions, it can be tested whether an uppermost electric asthenosphere layer with values of approximately 10 Ωm (proposed for the Betics region) is observable beneath central Iberia, or whether a more resistive upper mantle (as suggested by laboratory studies) satisfies the responses. If the location of the eLAB can be derived for the study area, its relative position in respect to the estimates for sLAB and tLAB in the region can be used to enhance knowledge about the local geological processes. Furthermore, by contrasting results of MT, seismic, and thermal studies conclusions can be drawn about composition and condition of the south-central Iberian Peninsula subsurface. 166
Part III A novel inversion approach for oblique geoelectric strike directions in crust and mantle The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new dis- coveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!) but “That’s funny” – Isaac Asimov
- Page 152 and 153: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 154 and 155: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 156 and 157: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 158 and 159: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 160 and 161: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 162 and 163: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 164 and 165: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 168 and 169: Part II Geology of the study area I
- Page 170 and 171: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 172 and 173: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 174 and 175: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 176 and 177: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 178 and 179: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 180 and 181: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 182 and 183: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 184 and 185: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 186 and 187: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 188 and 189: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 190 and 191: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 192 and 193: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 194 and 195: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 196 and 197: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 198 and 199: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 200 and 201: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 205 and 206: Recovering a synthetic 3D subsurfac
- Page 207 and 208: direction direction Depth: 12 - 30
- Page 209 and 210: 8.2. Generating synthetic 3D model
- Page 211 and 212: Distance from the centre of the mes
- Page 213 and 214: 3D N45W 3D-crust TE Rho TE Phi Peri
- Page 215 and 216: 8.3. Inversion of 3D model data sch
- Page 217 and 218: Model variation RMS misfit Optimal
- Page 219 and 220: Profile: 3D-crust (TM-only) Depth (
- Page 221 and 222: Parameter Value 8.3. Inversion of 3
- Page 223 and 224: Depth (km) 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10
- Page 225 and 226: Depth (km) 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10
- Page 227 and 228: Step 1: Isotropic 2D inversion Step
- Page 229 and 230: 8.3. Inversion of 3D model data par
- Page 231 and 232: 8.4. Summary and conclusions bution
- Page 233 and 234: Regularisation order Smoothing para
- Page 235 and 236: S N 1% 0 Depth (km) 3% Depth (km) 1
- Page 237 and 238: 9.1. Profile location Data collecti
- Page 239 and 240: Location (degrees) Recording period
- Page 241 and 242: Geological region Stations Geologic
- Page 243 and 244: 9.4. Segregation of data acquired w
- Page 245 and 246: Phase (degrees) 135 90 45 0 Z xy -4
- Page 247 and 248: 0 km 10 km 30 km 100 km 300 km Dept
- Page 249 and 250: 0 km 10 km 30 km 100 km 300 km Dept
- Page 251 and 252: 0 km 10 km 30 km 100 km 300 km Dept
7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula<br />
crystalline rocks, whereas seismic and xenolith studies indicate that the middle and lower<br />
crust consist of felsic intrusives and granulites, respectively. Since no seismic activity was<br />
recorded below the middle crust, it is likely that the lower crust, is an incompetent, ductile<br />
layer between the mantle and the other crustal layers.<br />
Faults with an approximately N45W direction intersect the PICASSO Phase I profile<br />
in the proximity of stations pic005, pic009, and pic013, potentially yielding a respective<br />
geoelectric strike direction in MT data of shorter periods. Material interfaces at crustal<br />
depth below the Tajo Basin, as interred from seismic studies, coincide with the borders<br />
of the Betic Cordillera and the Iberian Range. The respective ENE-WSW and NW-SE<br />
orientation of the interfaces indicate different geoelectric strike directions for the northern<br />
and southern parts of the PICASSO Phase I profile (cf. Sec. 9.6.1). Furthermore, since the<br />
low velocity feature, occurring slightly north of the Betic Cordillera, reaches down to at<br />
least 200 km, whereas the anomaly associated with the Iberian Range cannot be observed<br />
at depths greater than 53 km, it is likely that the geoelectric strike direction in the Tajo<br />
Basin below the PICASSO Phase I profile will also change with depth.<br />
Seismic tomography studies further derive low velocity structures at crustal depth beneath<br />
Betic Cordillera and Alboran Sea, in the mid- and lower crust beneath in the Campo<br />
de Montiel region, and an extensive low velocity region located approximately 50 km to<br />
350 km beneath the Tajo Basin. Different settings could explain such decreases of velocity,<br />
e.g. increased temperature, different chemistry, and the presence of partial melt or<br />
fluids. Investigation of the electric conductivity distribution in this region will add further<br />
constraints on this issue and might help to better understand the geological setting and the<br />
related tectonic evolution.<br />
In addition, results of the PICASSO Phase I investigation can help to reassess the<br />
stratigraphy of Tajo Basin and Betic Cordillera as deduced from seismic reflection and<br />
refraction studies. Formation of proposed Miocene folding and the depth extend of faults<br />
in the Tajo Basin may also be evaluated using results of this study. Further, the currently<br />
unknown eastward extent of the Iberian Massif beneath the Tajo Basin, in the region of<br />
the Manchega Plain, can be investigated given the significantly higher resistivity of the<br />
Iberian Massif.<br />
At deeper regions, it can be tested whether an uppermost electric asthenosphere layer<br />
with values of approximately 10 Ωm (proposed for the Betics region) is observable beneath<br />
central Iberia, or whether a more resistive upper mantle (as suggested by laboratory<br />
studies) satisfies the responses. If the location of the eLAB can be derived for the study<br />
area, its relative position in respect to the estimates for sLAB and tLAB in the region<br />
can be used to enhance knowledge about the local geological processes. Furthermore, by<br />
contrasting results of MT, seismic, and thermal studies conclusions can be drawn about<br />
composition and condition of the south-central Iberian Peninsula subsurface.<br />
166