P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS
P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS
7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula Station Moho depth (km) NE17 32.0 ±2.5 PAB 31.0 ±1.0 NE13 30.0 ±1.0 Tab. 7.3.: Depth of the Moho derived from Receiver Function analysis by Julià and Mejía [2004] for three stations on top of the Iberian Massif to the west of the Tajo Basin (see Figure 7.25 for station locations). and velocity reduction(films) < velocity reduction(tubes) < velocity reduction(spheres) [Mavko, 1980]. Goes et al. [2000] further argue that changes of composition and magnesium number (Mg#) have no significant direct effect on seismic velocity, but rather through related density changes; see also Jones et al. [2009] for details on this aspect. The actual effect of Mg# change is dependent on the local mineral composition, e.g. compressional velocity increases with increasing Mg# for olivine [Chen et al., 1996; James et al., 2004] and decreases for spinel and garnet peridotites [Kopylova et al., 2004]. However, the observed low velocity region may be due to a combination of the above-described parameters, wherein temperature is commonly assumed to account for the bulk of the velocity variation. More light on this aspect will be shed by results of the PICASSO Phase I investigation, providing additional information about the present material distribution and their condition in terms of electric conductivity. Receiver Function Receiver Function studies, the seismic method generally most capable of detecting the LAB, have been carried out in Spain by Julià et al. [1998] and Julià and Mejía [2004]. The authors use data from stations installed in the area of Ebro Basin, Betic Cordillera, and in the SW of the Iberian Peninsula of which four stations are located in proximity of the PICASSO Phase I profile (Fig. 7.25). Three of those stations are installed in the region of the southeastern Iberian Massif, whereas the forth station is located in the Betic Cordillera, all within approximately 1 degree to the west of the PICASSO Phase I profile. For the Tajo Basin the authors derive a Moho depth of around 31 km, slightly deepening towards the north (see Tab. 7.3 for details), using direct P teleseismic wave reverberation [Julià et al., 1998] and P-to-S converted waves (also referred to as P-wave receiver function (PRF)) [Julià and Mejía, 2004]. No details about deeper-seated features like the LAB are presented by Julià et al. [1998] or Julià and Mejía [2004], owing to the lack of sufficient data. The lack of good quality data is due to the masking effect of P-wave reverberations on PRF data and the general difficulty to obtain S-to-P converted waves (also referred to as S-wave receiver function (SRF)). 160
351˚ 354˚ 357˚ 7.3. Tajo Basin and central Spain 42˚ 42˚ NE17 PAB 39˚ NE13 39˚ NE14 PIC001 PIC041 36˚ 36˚ 351˚ 354˚ 357˚ 0˚ Fig. 7.25.: Locations of four Receiver Function stations used by Julià and Mejía [2004] to derive the Moho depth beneath the Iberian Peninsula (inverted triangles) and the MT stations deployed during the PICASSO Phase I fieldwork campaign (dots). Thermal and rheological models The difference of materials in terms of their ability to conduct heat from the Earth’s interior to the surface as well as their different degree of radiogenic activity enables scientist to draw conclusions about the material distribution within the crust and the depth of the thermal lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (tLAB). The latter is due to the fact that in the asthenosphere heat is transported by convection, hence an adiabatic temperature gradient prevails, whereas the temperature gradient of the lithosphere is due to heat conduction and therefore accordingly lower. This allows for an estimation of the tLAB depth coinciding with the depth of change in the heat transport mechanism, which is a good indicator of the mechanical LAB [e.g. Pollack and Chapman, 1977]. However, the transport-process change occurs within a transition zone rather than at a sharp boundary, and the tLAB has been proposed to coincide with temperatures of 1200, 1333, or 1350°C. Ambiguity regarding depth and temperature of the tLAB is aggravated due to the fact that location of the tLAB within the transition zone (i.e. its top, middle, or bottom) varies between authors. A summary of heat flow values for the Iberian Peninsula and its margins was published by Fernandez et al. [1998] using data from exploration wells and sea floor measurements. The Tajo Basin exhibits some degree of spatial variation of heat flow values from approximately 62 mW/m 2 in the north of the basin to approximately 70 mW/m 2 for the Campo de Montiel region in its south (Fig. 7.26) Higher heat flow values are indicative of a shal- 0˚ 161
- Page 146 and 147: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 148 and 149: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 150 and 151: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 152 and 153: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 154 and 155: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 156 and 157: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 158 and 159: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 160 and 161: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 162 and 163: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 164 and 165: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 168 and 169: Part II Geology of the study area I
- Page 170 and 171: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 172 and 173: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 174 and 175: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 176 and 177: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 178 and 179: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 180 and 181: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 182 and 183: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 184 and 185: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 186 and 187: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 188 and 189: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 190 and 191: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 192 and 193: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 194 and 195: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 198 and 199: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 200 and 201: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 202 and 203: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 205 and 206: Recovering a synthetic 3D subsurfac
- Page 207 and 208: direction direction Depth: 12 - 30
- Page 209 and 210: 8.2. Generating synthetic 3D model
- Page 211 and 212: Distance from the centre of the mes
- Page 213 and 214: 3D N45W 3D-crust TE Rho TE Phi Peri
- Page 215 and 216: 8.3. Inversion of 3D model data sch
- Page 217 and 218: Model variation RMS misfit Optimal
- Page 219 and 220: Profile: 3D-crust (TM-only) Depth (
- Page 221 and 222: Parameter Value 8.3. Inversion of 3
- Page 223 and 224: Depth (km) 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10
- Page 225 and 226: Depth (km) 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10
- Page 227 and 228: Step 1: Isotropic 2D inversion Step
- Page 229 and 230: 8.3. Inversion of 3D model data par
- Page 231 and 232: 8.4. Summary and conclusions bution
- Page 233 and 234: Regularisation order Smoothing para
- Page 235 and 236: S N 1% 0 Depth (km) 3% Depth (km) 1
- Page 237 and 238: 9.1. Profile location Data collecti
- Page 239 and 240: Location (degrees) Recording period
- Page 241 and 242: Geological region Stations Geologic
- Page 243 and 244: 9.4. Segregation of data acquired w
- Page 245 and 246: Phase (degrees) 135 90 45 0 Z xy -4
7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula<br />
Station Moho depth (km)<br />
NE17 32.0 ±2.5<br />
PAB 31.0 ±1.0<br />
NE13 30.0 ±1.0<br />
Tab. 7.3.: Depth of the Moho derived from Receiver Function analysis by Julià and Mejía [2004] for three stations on top of the<br />
Iberian Massif to the west of the Tajo Basin (see Figure 7.25 for station locations).<br />
and<br />
velocity reduction(films) < velocity reduction(tubes) < velocity reduction(spheres)<br />
[Mavko, 1980]. Goes et al. [2000] further argue that changes of composition and magnesium<br />
number (Mg#) have no significant direct effect on seismic velocity, but rather<br />
through related density changes; see also Jones et al. [2009] for details on this aspect.<br />
The actual effect of Mg# change is dependent on the local mineral composition, e.g. compressional<br />
velocity increases with increasing Mg# for olivine [Chen et al., 1996; James<br />
et al., 2004] and decreases for spinel and garnet peridotites [Kopylova et al., 2004]. However,<br />
the observed low velocity region may be due to a combination of the above-described<br />
parameters, wherein temperature is commonly assumed to account for the bulk of the velocity<br />
variation. More light on this aspect will be shed by results of the PICASSO Phase I<br />
investigation, providing additional information about the present material distribution and<br />
their condition in terms of electric conductivity.<br />
Receiver Function<br />
Receiver Function studies, the seismic method generally most capable of detecting the<br />
LAB, have been carried out in Spain by Julià et al. [1998] and Julià and Mejía [2004].<br />
The authors use data from stations installed in the area of Ebro Basin, Betic Cordillera,<br />
and in the SW of the Iberian Peninsula of which four stations are located in proximity<br />
of the PICASSO Phase I profile (Fig. 7.25). Three of those stations are installed in<br />
the region of the southeastern Iberian Massif, whereas the forth station is located in the<br />
Betic Cordillera, all within approximately 1 degree to the west of the PICASSO Phase I<br />
profile. For the Tajo Basin the authors derive a Moho depth of around 31 km, slightly<br />
deepening towards the north (see Tab. 7.3 for details), using direct P teleseismic wave<br />
reverberation [Julià et al., 1998] and P-to-S converted waves (also referred to as P-wave<br />
receiver function (PRF)) [Julià and Mejía, 2004]. No details about deeper-seated features<br />
like the LAB are presented by Julià et al. [1998] or Julià and Mejía [2004], owing to<br />
the lack of sufficient data. The lack of good quality data is due to the masking effect of<br />
P-wave reverberations on PRF data and the general difficulty to obtain S-to-P converted<br />
waves (also referred to as S-wave receiver function (SRF)).<br />
160