04.08.2013 Views

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6. Using magnetotellurics to gain information about the Earth<br />

(Sec. 3.3):<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ 2ρa(T) cos<br />

ρS W(δs) = ⎪⎩<br />

2 φ(T), for φ > 45o ρa(T)<br />

2 sin2 φ(T) , for φ < 45o .<br />

(6.19)<br />

The ρ ∗ − z ∗ transform is based on earlier approaches by [Schmucker, 1970; Weidelt, 1972;<br />

Schmucker, 1973; Weidelt et al., 1980] using similar formulations.<br />

ρS W(δNB) and ρNB(δNB) will not exhibit the same resistivity depth profile, except for<br />

the case of a homogeneous halfspace. In this case m(T) = 0 and φ(T) = 45°, thus<br />

ρS W(δs) = ρNB(δNB) = ρ ∀z, where ρ is the resistivity of the halfspace and z is the depth.<br />

6.3.2. Forward modelling<br />

In contrast to analytical approaches (Sec. 6.3.1), which attempt to find a direct mathematical<br />

relation between the measured data and subsurface characteristics, forward modelling<br />

(and the related inversion processes) aim to find a set of model parameters m that reproduce<br />

the measured data d through a functional f :<br />

d = f (m). (6.20)<br />

In MT, the model parameters m are usually logarithmic resistivity log(ρ) or logarithmic<br />

conductivity log(σ) of the subsurface, wherein the logarithmic expression is chosen to<br />

fit with the range of electric conductivity within the Earth as sensed by the MT method<br />

(cf. Sec. 5). The data vector d is usually given in terms of the electric impedance Z or<br />

the apparent resistivity ρa and phase φ for each station (cf. Sec. 3.2). In the following it<br />

is assumed that the vectors m and d are of length M and N, respectively. When vertical<br />

magnetic field data are available, the elements of the magnetic transfer function T can also<br />

be derived, adding further information about the subsurface. Alternatively, the (rotational<br />

invariant) determinant of the impedance matrix det(Z) can be used instead of ρ and φ to<br />

evaluate the model, having the advantage of being unaffected by certain types of distortion<br />

(cf. Sec. 4). However, due to the reduction of the number of degrees of freedom (eight 1<br />

for the complex impedance vector, two for its determinant), certain information about<br />

the subsurface is omitted when using the determinant to evaluate the model; thus the<br />

determinant evaluation is inferior and should not be used on its own.<br />

In MT, the functional f , which relates the model and data vectors, is usually an approximation<br />

of Maxwell’s Equations (Sec. 3.1.1) and is commonly carried out by forward<br />

modelling methods: finite difference (FD), finite element (FE), or integral equation (IE)<br />

[e.g. Avdeev, 2005; Press et al., 2007]. All methods approximate Maxwell’s Equations, or<br />

deduced equations, by reducing the differential terms therein to a system of linear equations<br />

A · x = b (6.21)<br />

1 four in the case of a 2D subsurface<br />

116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!