P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS
P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS
5. Earth’s properties observable with magnetotellurics gation zone for rising hot mantle material (plumes) originating at the CMB, as well as for descending crustal material subducted from the Earth’s surface. Subducting slabs, for instance, may be horizontally deflected in the MTZ and become dehydrated before continuing to sink into the lower mantle [Richard and Bercovici, 2009]. This implies reduced water content in the lower mantle, affecting local composition, density, and temperature conditions. Permeability of the MTZ, hence characteristics of its interaction with such vertical transport mechanisms, is highly dependent on its conditions [e.g. Davies, 1995; Karato et al., 1995; Jin et al., August, 2001; Karato et al., 2001]. The composition of the Earth’s mantle Two classic models exist for the composition of the mantle: pyrolytic (transformation of the compounds caused by heat) and piclogitic (picritic eclogite). In pyrolytic mantle models, the chemical difference between the upper and lower mantle is assumed negligible and differences within the mantle are attributed to mineral phase changes, whereas in piclogitic mantle models a more silica-(and iron-)rich lower mantle is proposed. Pyrolytic models are in good agreement with measured data and are favoured by the majority of authors [e.g. Ringwood, 1975; Poirier, 2000; Xu et al., 2000a]. Recent support for the pyrolytic model was provided, for example, by the results of Matas et al. [2007] proposing that the Earth’s mantle is most likely relatively homogeneous. The authors state that the lower mantle must have an average Mg–Si ratio lower than 1.3 in order to satisfactorily fit 1D seismic profiles. Moreover, Matas et al. [2007] claim that when a low value for the pressure derivative of the shear modulus for perovskite is adopted (µ ′ 0 ≈ 1.6 GPa/km), consistent with the most recent experimental results, the Mg–Si ratio of the bottom part of the lower mantle reduces to a value close to 1.18, thus denoting a more homogeneous mantle composition. The composition of the Earth’s mantle can either be derived directly from rock samples transported from the lithospheric-mantle to the surface as kimberlitic or volcanic xenoliths, or indirectly through interpretation of geophysical measurements. As a result of those measurements it is inferred that olivine, clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene, garnet, and perovskite are the most common minerals in the Earth’s mantle (cf. Fig. 5.11, and Tabs. 5.3 and 5.4). Olivine and its high-pressure polymorphs (wadsleyite, ringwoodite) form the most abundant minerals by volume (50 – 60 %) in the upper mantle, thus dominating its bulk electric conductivity, whereas perovskite and magnesiowüstite account for the majority of the lower mantle minerals [e.g. Ringwood, 1975; Xu et al., 2000a]. In the absence of areas with well-connected networks of fluids, ion conductors, or partial melt, the electric conductivity of the mantle is dominated by semiconduction (Sec. 5.1.3), therefore the conductivity of the mantle is mostly controlled by temperature (Eq. 5.9, Sec.5.3). Exact values of conductivity are dependent on specific parameters of the related materials and their fraction of the local composition. Conductivity of mantle minerals is primarily controlled by proton (H + ) and small polaron conduction (electron holes “hopping” between Fe2+ and Fe3+ ) [Xu et al., 1998a; Yoshino et al., 2008; Yoshino, 2010] 96
Species 5.2. Variation of electric conductivity with depth Whole-mantle models Upper mantle (1) (2) (3) (4) Olivine 47.2 36.5 37.8 51.4 Orthopyroxene 28.3 33.7 33.2 25.6 Clinopyroxene 22.5 16.8 13.6 11.65 Garnet 1.53 11.6 14.2 9.6 Ilmenite 0.2 0.5 0.24 0.57 Chromite - 1.6 0.94 0.44 Tab. 5.3.: Earlier models of mantle mineralogy, 1: Equilibrium condensation [BVP-Project, 1981], 2: Cosmochemical model [Ganapathy and Anders, 1974], 3: Cosmochemical model [Morgan and Anders, 1980], 4: Pyrolite [Ringwood, 1977]; in Anderson [2004]. Polymorph phases of olivine and lower mantle minerals (perovskite and magnesiowüstite) are not considered in these earlier mantle models (cf. Fig. 5.11 and Tab. 5.5). Name Formula Olivine (Mg,Fe)2SiO4 Orthopyroxene (Mg,Fe)2Si2O6 Clinopyroxene (Ca,Na)(Mg,Fe,Al,Ti)(Si,Al)2O6 Garnet (Ca,Al,Mg)3(Al,Fe3+,Cr)2(SiO4)3 Ilmenite FeTiO3 Chromite FeCr2O4 Perovskite CaTiO3 Magnesiowüstite (Mg,Fe)O Tab. 5.4.: Typical mantle rocks and there chemical formula; polymorph phases of olivine are wadsleyite and ringwoodite. 97
- Page 81 and 82: 3.5. The influence of electric perm
- Page 83 and 84: 3.5. The influence of electric perm
- Page 85 and 86: Distortion of magnetotelluric data
- Page 87 and 88: 4.1. Types of distortion Fig. 4.1.:
- Page 89 and 90: 4.1. Types of distortion Fig. 4.3.:
- Page 91 and 92: J s 0 s 0 4.1. Types of distortion
- Page 93 and 94: 4.1. Types of distortion Fig. 4.7.:
- Page 95 and 96: Scale Type Terminology Example Atom
- Page 97 and 98: 4.1. Types of distortion the use of
- Page 99 and 100: 4.2. Dimensionality Fig. 4.12.: The
- Page 101 and 102: 1D 2D local 3D/1D 3D/2D regional 4.
- Page 103 and 104: 4.3. General mathematical represent
- Page 105 and 106: 4.4. Removal of distortion effects
- Page 107 and 108: Parameter Geoelectrical application
- Page 109 and 110: 4.4. Removal of distortion effects
- Page 111 and 112: 4.4.5. Caldwell-Bibby-Brown phase t
- Page 113 and 114: 4.4. Removal of distortion effects
- Page 115: Method Applicability Swift angle 2D
- Page 118 and 119: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 120 and 121: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 122 and 123: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 124 and 125: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 126 and 127: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 128 and 129: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 130 and 131: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 134 and 135: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 136 and 137: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 138 and 139: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 140 and 141: 5. Earth’s properties observable
- Page 142 and 143: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 144 and 145: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 146 and 147: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 148 and 149: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 150 and 151: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 152 and 153: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 154 and 155: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 156 and 157: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 158 and 159: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 160 and 161: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 162 and 163: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 164 and 165: 6. Using magnetotellurics to gain i
- Page 168 and 169: Part II Geology of the study area I
- Page 170 and 171: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 172 and 173: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 174 and 175: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 176 and 177: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 178 and 179: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
- Page 180 and 181: 7. Geology of the Iberian Peninsula
5. Earth’s properties observable with magnetotellurics<br />
gation zone for rising hot mantle material (plumes) originating at the CMB, as well as<br />
for descending crustal material subducted from the Earth’s surface. Subducting slabs, for<br />
instance, may be horizontally deflected in the MTZ and become dehydrated before continuing<br />
to sink into the lower mantle [Richard and Bercovici, 2009]. This implies reduced<br />
water content in the lower mantle, affecting local composition, density, and temperature<br />
conditions. Permeability of the MTZ, hence characteristics of its interaction with such<br />
vertical transport mechanisms, is highly dependent on its conditions [e.g. Davies, 1995;<br />
Karato et al., 1995; Jin et al., August, 2001; Karato et al., 2001].<br />
The composition of the Earth’s mantle<br />
Two classic models exist for the composition of the mantle: pyrolytic (transformation<br />
of the compounds caused by heat) and piclogitic (picritic eclogite). In pyrolytic mantle<br />
models, the chemical difference between the upper and lower mantle is assumed negligible<br />
and differences within the mantle are attributed to mineral phase changes, whereas<br />
in piclogitic mantle models a more silica-(and iron-)rich lower mantle is proposed. Pyrolytic<br />
models are in good agreement with measured data and are favoured by the majority<br />
of authors [e.g. Ringwood, 1975; Poirier, 2000; Xu et al., 2000a]. Recent support for the<br />
pyrolytic model was provided, for example, by the results of Matas et al. [2007] proposing<br />
that the Earth’s mantle is most likely relatively homogeneous. The authors state that<br />
the lower mantle must have an average Mg–Si ratio lower than 1.3 in order to satisfactorily<br />
fit 1D seismic profiles. Moreover, Matas et al. [2007] claim that when a low value for<br />
the pressure derivative of the shear modulus for perovskite is adopted (µ ′<br />
0 ≈ 1.6 GPa/km),<br />
consistent with the most recent experimental results, the Mg–Si ratio of the bottom part<br />
of the lower mantle reduces to a value close to 1.18, thus denoting a more homogeneous<br />
mantle composition.<br />
The composition of the Earth’s mantle can either be derived directly from rock samples<br />
transported from the lithospheric-mantle to the surface as kimberlitic or volcanic xenoliths,<br />
or indirectly through interpretation of geophysical measurements. As a result of<br />
those measurements it is inferred that olivine, clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene, garnet, and<br />
perovskite are the most common minerals in the Earth’s mantle (cf. Fig. 5.11, and Tabs.<br />
5.3 and 5.4). Olivine and its high-pressure polymorphs (wadsleyite, ringwoodite) form<br />
the most abundant minerals by volume (50 – 60 %) in the upper mantle, thus dominating<br />
its bulk electric conductivity, whereas perovskite and magnesiowüstite account for the<br />
majority of the lower mantle minerals [e.g. Ringwood, 1975; Xu et al., 2000a].<br />
In the absence of areas with well-connected networks of fluids, ion conductors, or partial<br />
melt, the electric conductivity of the mantle is dominated by semiconduction (Sec.<br />
5.1.3), therefore the conductivity of the mantle is mostly controlled by temperature (Eq.<br />
5.9, Sec.5.3). Exact values of conductivity are dependent on specific parameters of the<br />
related materials and their fraction of the local composition. Conductivity of mantle minerals<br />
is primarily controlled by proton (H + ) and small polaron conduction (electron holes<br />
“hopping” between Fe2+ and Fe3+ ) [Xu et al., 1998a; Yoshino et al., 2008; Yoshino, 2010]<br />
96