P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS
P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS
Earth’s properties observable with magnetotellurics 5 Electromagnetic (EM) methods determine the distribution of electric conductivity 1 σ in the subsurface by measuring the relation between time-varying electric and magnetic field components (cf. Sec. 3.2). Electric conductivity is the measure of a material’s ability to conduct electric current, specific for a material under given conditions. Thus, EM methods can, in principle, derive the distribution of materials in the subsurface. However, the magnetotelluric (MT) method does not measure the electric conductivity at a certain point in the subsurface, but rather the integrated conductivity of a volume. A volume represented approximately by a hemisphere of radius given by the inductive distance (cf. Sec. 3.3). Therefore, assumptions have to be made about the local conductivity distribution during analysis and interpretation of the obtained data (cf. Secs. 3 and 6). Electric conductivity of a material depends on a variety of different properties (cf. Sec. 5.3); accordingly, common Earth’s materials exhibit a wide range of values from 10 7 – 10 −7 S/m (i.e. resistivities in the range 10 −7 – 10 7 Ωm) (Fig. 3.5). Among the different factors influencing the electric conductivity of materials in the Earth, temperature, water salinity, and interconnectivity of conductors have the most significant effects. These influencing parameters can undergo very localised changes, both in the vertical and the horizontal directions; e.g. a massive ore body or horizontal temperature gradients in mantle convection cells can result in conductivity changes of several orders of magnitude. Therefore, the creation of a global 1D electric reference model possesses a number of challenges when compared to the seismological Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM) [Dziewonski and Anderson, 1981] (Fig. 5.1). The present spatial coverage with MT measurements is not yet sufficient to take into account the large amount of regional, let alone local conductivity anomalies, to facilitate creation of a global 3D conductivity 1 There lies a redundancy in terminology when describing the electric properties of materials; in some cases σ is chosen, whereas in other cases electric resistivity ρ is used. As σ and ρ are simply inverses of each other (ρ = 1/σ with [ρ] = Ωm and [σ] = S/m), the convention used in the remainder of this text is chosen out of convenience; conductivity will be used when the majority of the elements exhibit σ > 1 (ρ < 1) and resistivity in the opposite case. 81
- Page 67 and 68: Mathematical description of electro
- Page 69 and 70: yields 3.2. Deriving magnetotelluri
- Page 71 and 72: 3.2. Deriving magnetotelluric param
- Page 73 and 74: 3.3. Magnetotelluric induction area
- Page 75 and 76: Depth d s d 1 d 2 d n-2 d n-1 t 1 t
- Page 77 and 78: 3.4. Boundary conditions materials
- Page 79 and 80: 3.5. The influence of electric perm
- Page 81 and 82: 3.5. The influence of electric perm
- Page 83 and 84: 3.5. The influence of electric perm
- Page 85 and 86: Distortion of magnetotelluric data
- Page 87 and 88: 4.1. Types of distortion Fig. 4.1.:
- Page 89 and 90: 4.1. Types of distortion Fig. 4.3.:
- Page 91 and 92: J s 0 s 0 4.1. Types of distortion
- Page 93 and 94: 4.1. Types of distortion Fig. 4.7.:
- Page 95 and 96: Scale Type Terminology Example Atom
- Page 97 and 98: 4.1. Types of distortion the use of
- Page 99 and 100: 4.2. Dimensionality Fig. 4.12.: The
- Page 101 and 102: 1D 2D local 3D/1D 3D/2D regional 4.
- Page 103 and 104: 4.3. General mathematical represent
- Page 105 and 106: 4.4. Removal of distortion effects
- Page 107 and 108: Parameter Geoelectrical application
- Page 109 and 110: 4.4. Removal of distortion effects
- Page 111 and 112: 4.4.5. Caldwell-Bibby-Brown phase t
- Page 113 and 114: 4.4. Removal of distortion effects
- Page 115: Method Applicability Swift angle 2D
- Page 119 and 120: Anode (positively charged terminal)
- Page 121 and 122: σ (S/m) 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 -1 10 -2
- Page 123 and 124: 5.2. Variation of electric conducti
- Page 125 and 126: 5.2. Variation of electric conducti
- Page 127 and 128: Compound Formula 5.2. Variation of
- Page 129 and 130: 5.2. Variation of electric conducti
- Page 131 and 132: 5.2. Variation of electric conducti
- Page 133 and 134: Species 5.2. Variation of electric
- Page 135 and 136: 5.3. Parameters controlling the con
- Page 137 and 138: 5.3. Parameters controlling the con
- Page 139 and 140: 5.3. Parameters controlling the con
- Page 141 and 142: Using magnetotellurics to gain info
- Page 143 and 144: Electric dipoles N 6.1. Recording o
- Page 145 and 146: 6.2. Processing of magnetotelluric
- Page 147 and 148: 6.2. Processing of magnetotelluric
- Page 149 and 150: data, Hx and Hy are uncorrelated an
- Page 151 and 152: 6.3. Deriving subsurface structure
- Page 153 and 154: 6.3. Deriving subsurface structure
- Page 155 and 156: Integral equation methods 6.3. Deri
- Page 157 and 158: 6.3. Deriving subsurface structure
- Page 159 and 160: 6.3. Deriving subsurface structure
- Page 161 and 162: 6.3. Deriving subsurface structure
- Page 163 and 164: 6.3. Deriving subsurface structure
- Page 165: 6.3. Deriving subsurface structure
Earth’s properties observable with magnetotellurics<br />
5<br />
Electromagnetic (EM) methods determine the distribution of electric conductivity 1 σ in<br />
the subsurface by measuring the relation between time-varying electric and magnetic field<br />
components (cf. Sec. 3.2). Electric conductivity is the measure of a material’s ability to<br />
conduct electric current, specific for a material under given conditions. Thus, EM methods<br />
can, in principle, derive the distribution of materials in the subsurface. However, the magnetotelluric<br />
(MT) method does not measure the electric conductivity at a certain point in<br />
the subsurface, but rather the integrated conductivity of a volume. A volume represented<br />
approximately by a hemisphere of radius given by the inductive distance (cf. Sec. 3.3).<br />
Therefore, assumptions have to be made about the local conductivity distribution during<br />
analysis and interpretation of the obtained data (cf. Secs. 3 and 6).<br />
Electric conductivity of a material depends on a variety of different properties (cf. Sec.<br />
5.3); accordingly, common Earth’s materials exhibit a wide range of values from 10 7 –<br />
10 −7 S/m (i.e. resistivities in the range 10 −7 – 10 7 Ωm) (Fig. 3.5). Among the different<br />
factors influencing the electric conductivity of materials in the Earth, temperature, water<br />
salinity, and interconnectivity of conductors have the most significant effects. These<br />
influencing parameters can undergo very localised changes, both in the vertical and the<br />
horizontal directions; e.g. a massive ore body or horizontal temperature gradients in<br />
mantle convection cells can result in conductivity changes of several orders of magnitude.<br />
Therefore, the creation of a global 1D electric reference model possesses a number<br />
of challenges when compared to the seismological Preliminary Reference Earth Model<br />
(PREM) [Dziewonski and Anderson, 1981] (Fig. 5.1). The present spatial coverage with<br />
MT measurements is not yet sufficient to take into account the large amount of regional,<br />
let alone local conductivity anomalies, to facilitate creation of a global 3D conductivity<br />
1 There lies a redundancy in terminology when describing the electric properties of materials; in some<br />
cases σ is chosen, whereas in other cases electric resistivity ρ is used. As σ and ρ are simply inverses of<br />
each other (ρ = 1/σ with [ρ] = Ωm and [σ] = S/m), the convention used in the remainder of this text is<br />
chosen out of convenience; conductivity will be used when the majority of the elements exhibit σ > 1<br />
(ρ < 1) and resistivity in the opposite case.<br />
81