04.08.2013 Views

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

P. Schmoldt, PhD - MTNet - DIAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Parameter Geoelectrical application<br />

4.4. Removal of distortion effects<br />

ηB = √ C/|D2| Descriptiveness of MT tensor by superimposed model<br />

µB = ([D1, S 2] + [S 1, D2]) 1/2 /|D2| Phase difference in the MT tensor<br />

ΣB = (D2 1 + S 2 2 )/D2 2<br />

Two-dimensionality<br />

Tab. 4.2.: Parameters defined by Bahr [1988] (with modifications by Prácser and Szarka [1999]) to describe distortion of the MT<br />

impedance tensor; see text for details about parameters.<br />

This concept was later advanced by Jones and Groom [1993], who suggest decomposing<br />

for an impedance tensor rotated 45 degrees against the strike direction instead of an<br />

impedance tensor orientated parallel to strike. The authors’ modification is based on the<br />

fact that in the case of no distortion, or symmetric distortion, the angles φex and φey are un-<br />

defined, because the off-diagonal elements of the distortion matrix cxy and cyx (Eq. 4.21)<br />

are zero. Incorporating this modification in Equation 4.39 yields<br />

φ1(Θ)<br />

φ2(Θ)<br />

=<br />

=<br />

<br />

Im[(Zxx(Θ) + Zxy(Θ))/(Zyx(Θ) + Zyy(Θ))]<br />

arctan<br />

,<br />

Re[(Zxx(Θ) + Zxy(Θ))/(Zyx(Θ) + Zyy(Θ))]<br />

<br />

Im[(Zxx(Θ) − Zxy(Θ))/(Zyx(Θ) − Zyy(Θ))]<br />

arctan<br />

.<br />

Re[(Zxx(Θ) − Zxy(Θ))/(Zyx(Θ) − Zyy(Θ))]<br />

(4.40)<br />

(4.41)<br />

4.4.3. Weaver-Agarwal-Lilley tensor invariants<br />

Weaver et al. [2000] use seven independent plus one dependent parameter that are invariant<br />

under horizontal rotation of the coordinate system plus an angle Θ to describe the<br />

MT impedance tensor Z, the dimensionality of the subsurface, and the distortion type<br />

(Tab. 4.3). Θ defines therein the angle between the x-axis of the coordinate system used<br />

for the processing and a fixed direction (e.g. magnetic north). The methods of Weaver<br />

et al. [2000] is an extension of the work by [Bahr, 1988] (Sec. 4.4.2), with the last three<br />

Weaver-Agarwal-Lilley’s (WAL) independent parameter (Tab. 4.3, i.e. parameters I5, I6,<br />

I7) are retraces of Bahr’s parameters (Tab. 4.2).<br />

Weaver et al. [2000] define their parameters through the variables ξ, η, and di j representing<br />

real and imaginary parts of the impedance tensor:<br />

(2µ0) −1 [Zxx + Zyy] = ξ1 + ıη1 (4.42)<br />

(2µ0) −1 [Zxy + Zyx] = ξ2 + ıη2 (4.43)<br />

(2µ0) −1 [Zxx − Zyy] = ξ3 + ıη3 (4.44)<br />

(2µ0) −1 [Zxy − Zyx] = ξ4 + ıη4 (4.45)<br />

ξiη j − ξ jηi<br />

I1I2<br />

= di j (4.46)<br />

with µ0 the permeability of free space. A visual representation of the parameters can be<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!