Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet
Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet
Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 75 outweigh slightly the field from deep induction currents in the mantle. Without the dampening effect of a core ( P = 0) we would have obtained T) s = 2.67. We infer from(5. 60) that the internal shell term Is leads in phase relative to the external term E by tan-1[ l/Tl s] , while the corresponding core term Ic lags in phase by tan-lT) s, when Sc is close to its upper real limit. Thus, induction anomalies which originate from nonuniformities in the shell will lead in phase relative to those of deep origin (cf. fig. 35). Figure 34 illustrates the complexity of the mutual dependence of shell and core induction. The induction curves for T)n = 0 refer to a shell without core. With increasing conductivity of the core the curves are shifted toward higher 0.2 10 4,,(".)(:. d A 10 100 1000 Fig. 34. Induction curves for a special shell-core model, shown for various induction parameters 1)n of the uniform core. Upper diagram: in-phase components of the internal part, shown separately for shell and core induction in accordance with equation 5.60. Lower diagram: out-of-phase components of the internal part. values of the shell-induction parameter, wmch implies that higher conductivities in the shell are needed to produce the same induced field from the shell (= dampening effect of the core). For T) n = co the ultimate curves for a perfect conductor at the indicated depth are reached. We see that the core induction is suppressed at the same rate as the shell induction is built up (= shielding effect of the shell); Is and I c preserve their characteristic opposite arguments except for small values of T)n and 41TWTA.
- Page 36: 26 Bulletin, Scripps Institution of
- Page 42 and 43: 32 Bulletin, Scripps Institution of
- Page 50: 40 It SAC LAJ ELA ALP TU C Bulletin
- Page 66: 56 Bulletin, Scripps Institution of
- Page 73: as general solution of (5.30), yiel
- Page 79: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 6
- Page 82: 72 Bulletin, Scripps Institution of
- Page 87: 6, ELEOTROMAGNErrIO INDUOTION IN NO
- Page 101: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 9
- Page 107 and 108: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations I
- Page 110 and 111: 100 Bulletin. Scripps Institution o
- Page 113: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 1
- Page 117: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 1
- Page 125: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 1
- Page 128: 118 Bulletin, Scripps Institution o
<strong>Schmucker</strong>: Geomagnetic Variations 75<br />
outweigh slightly the field from deep induction currents in the mantle. Without<br />
the dampening effect of a core ( P = 0) we would have obtained T) s = 2.67.<br />
We infer from(5. 60) that the internal shell term Is leads in phase relative<br />
to the external term E by tan-1[ l/Tl s] , while the corresponding core term Ic<br />
lags in phase by tan-lT) s, when Sc is close to its upper real limit. Thus, induction<br />
anomalies which originate from nonuniformities in the shell will lead<br />
in phase relative to those of deep origin (cf. fig. 35).<br />
Figure 34 illustrates the complexity of the mutual dependence of shell and<br />
core induction. The induction curves for T)n = 0 refer to a shell without core.<br />
With increasing conductivity of the core the curves are shifted toward higher<br />
0.2 10 4,,(".)(:. d A 10 100 1000<br />
Fig. 34. Induction curves for a<br />
special shell-core model, shown<br />
for various induction parameters<br />
1)n of the uniform core. Upper<br />
diagram: in-phase components of<br />
the internal part, shown separately<br />
for shell and core induction<br />
in accordance with<br />
equation 5.60. Lower diagram:<br />
out-of-phase components of the<br />
internal part.<br />
values of the shell-induction parameter, wmch implies that higher conductivities<br />
in the shell are needed to produce the same induced field from the<br />
shell (= dampening effect of the core). For T) n = co the ultimate curves for a<br />
perfect conductor at the indicated depth are reached. We see that the core<br />
induction is suppressed at the same rate as the shell induction is built up<br />
(= shielding effect of the shell); Is and I c preserve their characteristic opposite<br />
arguments except for small values of T)n and 41TWTA.