Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet
Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet
Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 71 Furthermore, h shall be small compared to the wave length of the source fi:eld, yielding k • h « 1, but large in comparison to the skin-depth value P3 of the substratum. This ensures that the wave number k of the incident field drops out of the following relations. The application of the recurrence formula (5.44) gives which when substituted above yields G 2 (d) '" (kh) -1 1 + KIh tanh (KId) G/O)::;: KI h + tanh (K I d) C(d) KIh c(O) = KIh cosh(KId) + sinh (KId) '" d 1--h+d (5.58) The approximation becomes valid when PI is about three times the thickness d as seen from the asymptotic behavior of the curves in figure 32. Hence, a finite ratio d/h limits the uniformity of c in the top layer even for those frequencies, for which PI »d. We infer from (5.58) and figure 32 that c remains uniform within d/(h + d) percent as long as PI > 3d, thereby setting limits for Price's method. 1.0 JJ .Y..!!1 £(0) .6 ., .2 Fig. 32. Attenuation of tangential electric field variations C .(z) within the top layer of a special 3-layer model, shown as function of skindepth value to thic.kness of the top layer. Solid curves: real part of C(d)/ C(O); dashed curves: imaginary part. Consider, for instance, the induction in a 4 km deep ocean (
- Page 30: 20 Bulletin, Scripps Institution of
- Page 36: 26 Bulletin, Scripps Institution of
- Page 42 and 43: 32 Bulletin, Scripps Institution of
- Page 50: 40 It SAC LAJ ELA ALP TU C Bulletin
- Page 66: 56 Bulletin, Scripps Institution of
- Page 73: as general solution of (5.30), yiel
- Page 79: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 6
- Page 85 and 86: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 7
- Page 87: 6, ELEOTROMAGNErrIO INDUOTION IN NO
- Page 101: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 9
- Page 107 and 108: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations I
- Page 110 and 111: 100 Bulletin. Scripps Institution o
- Page 113: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 1
- Page 117: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 1
- Page 125: Schmucker: Geomagnetic Variations 1
- Page 128: 118 Bulletin, Scripps Institution o
<strong>Schmucker</strong>: Geomagnetic Variations 71<br />
Furthermore, h shall be small compared to the wave length of the source<br />
fi:eld, yielding k • h « 1, but large in comparison to the skin-depth value P3<br />
of the substratum. This ensures that the wave number k of the incident field<br />
drops out of the following relations.<br />
The application of the recurrence formula (5.44) gives<br />
which when substituted above yields<br />
G 2 (d) '" (kh) -1<br />
1 + KIh tanh (KId)<br />
G/O)::;: KI h + tanh (K I d)<br />
C(d) KIh<br />
c(O) = KIh cosh(KId) + sinh (KId) '"<br />
d<br />
1--h+d<br />
(5.58)<br />
The approximation becomes valid when PI is about three times the thickness<br />
d as seen from the asymptotic behavior of the curves in figure 32. Hence, a<br />
finite ratio d/h limits the uniformity of c in the top layer even for those frequencies,<br />
for which PI »d. We infer from (5.58) and figure 32 that c remains<br />
uniform within d/(h + d) percent as long as PI > 3d, thereby setting<br />
limits for Price's method.<br />
1.0<br />
JJ<br />
.Y..!!1<br />
£(0)<br />
.6<br />
.,<br />
.2<br />
Fig. 32. Attenuation of tangential<br />
electric field variations C .(z) within<br />
the top layer of a special 3-layer<br />
model, shown as function of skindepth<br />
value to thic.kness of the top<br />
layer. Solid curves: real part of<br />
C(d)/ C(O); dashed curves: imaginary<br />
part.<br />
Consider, for instance, the induction in a 4 km deep ocean (