04.08.2013 Views

Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet

Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet

Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Schmucker</strong>: Geomagnetic Variations 69<br />

5.6 Direct Inversion of Surface Observations<br />

The inversion of the previous section can be generalized as follows. Suppose<br />

the impedance or the Z/H ratio above a multilayered substratum has been<br />

observed or calculated. We apply (5.55) to these ratios and obtain for each<br />

resolved frequency component depth and conductivity of a uniform substitute<br />

conductor. This substitution is meaningful only when the arguments of the<br />

ratios lie between i 1T and l 1T, thereby yielding a positive depth h. A multilayered<br />

substratum is in tE-at case indistinguishable from and therefore replaceable<br />

by a uniform conductor at the depth h, as far as its response to a<br />

single frequency component of the incident variation field is concerned. It is<br />

presumed, of course, that (h + Pc) is small against the wave length of the<br />

source field. Cf. p.108 for an extension to spherical conductors.<br />

The depth h" from (5.56), however, is always positive or zero, since the<br />

arguments of E/H and Z/H cannot be smaller than zero. Hence, we can interpret<br />

the out-of-phase component of any given ratio E/H or Z/H in terms<br />

of a perfect substitute conductor at the depth<br />

h* = w -1 Irn(E/H) (S.S7a)<br />

while the in-phase component yields in p the apparent conductivity<br />

c<br />

ITc = '!J {81T[Re(E/H)]2 } -1 (S.S7b)<br />

at that depth. Plots of h* versus IT c for a number of different frequencies<br />

represent good approximations of the true conductivity distribution as demonstrated<br />

in figure 31.<br />

Cagniard's (1953) definition of the "apparent resistivity" which is commonly<br />

used in this context is based on the modulus of the impedance. It would<br />

yield as apparent skin-depth value the modulus of cfl, while the parameters<br />

h* and ITc as defined above give proper regard to the in-phase and out-ofphase<br />

component of the impedance.<br />

5.7 Special Case III: Limitations of Price's Method<br />

Repeated use will be made of Price's method when dealing with the induction<br />

in thin sheets Or shells (cf. sec. 1.2). This method becomes inadequate<br />

(a) when the skin-depth value of the sheet is equal to or even smaller than<br />

its thickness, and (b) when the sheet is underlain at shallow depth by a good<br />

conductor. In both cases the tangential electric field is distinctly attenuated<br />

within the sheet and the integration of equation 1. 8 cannot be carried out with E<br />

as a constant. Since the terrestrial surface layers, to which this method<br />

will be applied, are indeed underlain at some depth by highly conductive<br />

mantle material, such limitations for Price's method deserve careful consideration.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!