Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet

Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet Schmucker, 1970 (Scripps) - MTNet

mtnet.dias.ie
from mtnet.dias.ie More from this publisher
04.08.2013 Views

14 Bulletin. Scripps Institution of Oceanography earth is, as a rule, small in comparison to their spatial nonuniformity. As a consequence, the downward attenuation of F and thereby the correlation between Fa and F' are independent of the "wave number" of the incident variation field as is evident from the pertinent relations of sections 5.2 and 5.3 • . It remains to verify the truly internal origin of the induction anomaly which these transfer functions describe in a normalized form. To this end we apply separation methods to their spatial distribution for each resolved frequency component, thereby eliminating unwanted contaminations of external origin. In summary, the successive steps of the data reduction are (a) digitalization of the magnetograms within selected time intervals, (b) separation of anomalous and normal parts of the. observed variations, (c) cross correlation between the anomalous and normal parts in the frequency domain, (d) sepa- . ration of external and internal parts of the thus normalized anomalous part. 3.2 Selection of Time Intervals for Analysis Three months of field operations with six Askanias gave about sixty days of usable simultaneous records from all stations. From these eight quiet days were chosenfor the study of the slow diurnal variations and about thirty hours of vigorous magnetic activity for the analysis of fast variations. We can choose here between isolated events of short duration and long-lasting disturbances or storms. Plates I and II show typical examples. Single events, in particular so-called bays, provide an excellent signal which clearly stands out from the general background activity of quiet nights, even though it contains only few usable frequencies. Numerous events in various frequency groups can be evaluated without involving an unreasonable amount of scaling. Storms permit us to analyze a wide frequency range concurrently, but the overhead storm field is of greater complexity than the smooth field of bays in mid-latitudes. This impairs the proper identification and analysiS of induction anomalies. Furthermore, suitable storms of moderate intensity are rare events and the chance to record one successfully at all survey stations is not very large. In short, the forthcoming deductions are derived primarily from the anomalous behavior of single events. In one instance thus obtained results were checked against those from a magnetic storm and found to be comparable (fig. 23). 3.3 Scaling and Scaling Errors The traces in D, Hand Z have been scaled either on photographic prints, 12 -fold enlarged from the 16 mm film, or with the aid of a Kodagraph microfilm reader with a 20-fold magnification. For prints the reSUlting time resolution was 1 min/mm and the scale values were roughly 3y fmm in D and H, 1. 5y /mm in Z. Individual readings of the traces relative to the base line were-made at fixed time intervals as described in sections 3.6 and 3.7.

14 Bulletin. <strong>Scripps</strong> Institution of Oceanography<br />

earth is, as a rule, small in comparison to their spatial nonuniformity. As<br />

a consequence, the downward attenuation of F and thereby the correlation<br />

between Fa and F' are independent of the "wave number" of the incident variation<br />

field as is evident from the pertinent relations of sections 5.2 and 5.3 •<br />

. It remains to verify the truly internal origin of the induction anomaly which<br />

these transfer functions describe in a normalized form. To this end we apply<br />

separation methods to their spatial distribution for each resolved frequency<br />

component, thereby eliminating unwanted contaminations of external origin.<br />

In summary, the successive steps of the data reduction are (a) digitalization<br />

of the magnetograms within selected time intervals, (b) separation of<br />

anomalous and normal parts of the. observed variations, (c) cross correlation<br />

between the anomalous and normal parts in the frequency domain, (d) sepa- .<br />

ration of external and internal parts of the thus normalized anomalous part.<br />

3.2 Selection of Time Intervals for Analysis<br />

Three months of field operations with six Askanias gave about sixty days of<br />

usable simultaneous records from all stations. From these eight quiet days<br />

were chosenfor the study of the slow diurnal variations and about thirty hours<br />

of vigorous magnetic activity for the analysis of fast variations. We can<br />

choose here between isolated events of short duration and long-lasting disturbances<br />

or storms. Plates I and II show typical examples.<br />

Single events, in particular so-called bays, provide an excellent signal<br />

which clearly stands out from the general background activity of quiet nights,<br />

even though it contains only few usable frequencies. Numerous events in<br />

various frequency groups can be evaluated without involving an unreasonable<br />

amount of scaling. Storms permit us to analyze a wide frequency range concurrently,<br />

but the overhead storm field is of greater complexity than the<br />

smooth field of bays in mid-latitudes. This impairs the proper identification<br />

and analysiS of induction anomalies. Furthermore, suitable storms of moderate<br />

intensity are rare events and the chance to record one successfully at<br />

all survey stations is not very large.<br />

In short, the forthcoming deductions are derived primarily from the<br />

anomalous behavior of single events. In one instance thus obtained results<br />

were checked against those from a magnetic storm and found to be comparable<br />

(fig. 23).<br />

3.3 Scaling and Scaling Errors<br />

The traces in D, Hand Z have been scaled either on photographic prints,<br />

12 -fold enlarged from the 16 mm film, or with the aid of a Kodagraph microfilm<br />

reader with a 20-fold magnification. For prints the reSUlting time resolution<br />

was 1 min/mm and the scale values were roughly 3y fmm in D and H,<br />

1. 5y /mm in Z. Individual readings of the traces relative to the base line<br />

were-made at fixed time intervals as described in sections 3.6 and 3.7.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!