04.08.2013 Views

'Face' and the embodiment of stigma in China - The Department of ...

'Face' and the embodiment of stigma in China - The Department of ...

'Face' and the embodiment of stigma in China - The Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases<br />

<strong>of</strong> schizophrenia <strong>and</strong> AIDS<br />

Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang a, *, Arthur Kle<strong>in</strong>man b<br />

a <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, Room 1610, New York, NY 10032, United States<br />

b <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Anthropology, Harvard University, William James Hall, Room 330, 33 Kirkl<strong>and</strong> Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States<br />

Keywords:<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

AIDS<br />

Face<br />

Mental illness<br />

Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Social capital<br />

Culture<br />

Stigma<br />

Introduction<br />

abstract<br />

Current <strong>the</strong>oretical models have greatly advanced our<br />

underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> how <strong>stigma</strong> affects people via a broad<br />

array <strong>of</strong> psychological processes <strong>and</strong> social mechanisms.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>ories have generated much research by<br />

highlight<strong>in</strong>g different routes by which <strong>stigma</strong> acts upon<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual, <strong>the</strong> great majority limits <strong>the</strong> negative effects<br />

* Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author. Tel.: þ1 212 305-4747; fax: þ1 212 342 5169.<br />

E-mail addresses: lhy2001@columbia.edu (L.H. Yang), kle<strong>in</strong>man@<br />

wjh.harvard.edu (A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man).<br />

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect<br />

Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/socscimed<br />

0277-9536/$ – see front matter Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br />

doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />

<strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical models have def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>stigma</strong> as occurr<strong>in</strong>g psychologically <strong>and</strong><br />

limit its negative effects to <strong>in</strong>dividual processes. This paper, via an analysis <strong>of</strong> how ‘face’<br />

is embodied <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, deepens an articulation <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> social aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> might<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>the</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> both <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>and</strong> collective actors def<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong><br />

a local context. We illustrate (1) how one’s moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g is lodged with<strong>in</strong> a local social<br />

world; (2) how one’s status as a ‘moral’ community member is cont<strong>in</strong>gent upon uphold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>trapersonal <strong>and</strong> social-transactional obligations; <strong>and</strong> (3) how loss <strong>of</strong> face <strong>and</strong> fears <strong>of</strong><br />

moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation might lead to a ‘social death’. We first draw from Ch<strong>in</strong>ese ethnographies<br />

that describe <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> human cultivation before one can achieve fully ‘moral’<br />

status <strong>in</strong> society. We <strong>in</strong>tegrate f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from empirical studies describ<strong>in</strong>g how social-exchange<br />

networks <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a are strictly organized based on <strong>the</strong> reciprocation <strong>of</strong> favors, moral<br />

position<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> ‘face’. We fur<strong>the</strong>r ground <strong>the</strong>se Ch<strong>in</strong>ese constructs with<strong>in</strong> a <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> different forms <strong>of</strong> capital, <strong>and</strong> discuss <strong>the</strong> severe social consequences that<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> face entails. By utiliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> examples <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia <strong>and</strong> AIDS to illustrate<br />

how loss <strong>of</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> is <strong>in</strong>terwoven <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, we propose a model highlight<strong>in</strong>g<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> moral status to describe how <strong>stigma</strong> operates. We suggest that symbolic<br />

restoration <strong>of</strong> moral status for <strong>stigma</strong>tized groups takes place as local-level <strong>stigma</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terventions. By analyz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> moral aspects <strong>of</strong> ‘face’, we propose that across cultures,<br />

<strong>stigma</strong> is embedded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral experience <strong>of</strong> participants, whereby <strong>stigma</strong> is conceived<br />

as a fundamentally moral issue: <strong>stigma</strong>tized conditions threaten what matters most for<br />

those <strong>in</strong> a local world. We fur<strong>the</strong>r propose that <strong>stigma</strong> jeopardizes an actor’s ability to mobilize<br />

social capital to atta<strong>in</strong> essential social statuses.<br />

Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> to self-processes. Consequently, <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

psychological processes are predom<strong>in</strong>antly seen to mediate<br />

<strong>stigma</strong>’s effects, <strong>and</strong> negative outcomes result from how an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual copes with <strong>and</strong> responds to <strong>stigma</strong> (Parker &<br />

Aggleton, 2003).<br />

Conceptual models have described <strong>stigma</strong>’s social<br />

elements <strong>in</strong> manifold ways which we outl<strong>in</strong>e briefly (for<br />

a full analysis, see Yang et al., 2007). Social psychological<br />

models primarily deal with <strong>the</strong>se aspects as a ‘social identity’<br />

applied to an <strong>in</strong>dividual, situational stimulus that <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

respond to, or as cultural stereotypes (Crocker,<br />

Major, & Steele, 1998). Sociological models describe <strong>the</strong><br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011


2<br />

social doma<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> as occurr<strong>in</strong>g when objects <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

social world obta<strong>in</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g through symbolic <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />

(G<strong>of</strong>fman, 1963; L<strong>in</strong>k, Cullen, Struen<strong>in</strong>g, Shrout, & Dohrenwend,<br />

1989), while o<strong>the</strong>r authors express <strong>the</strong>se social<br />

dimensions as occurr<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>in</strong>stitutional, structural,<br />

<strong>and</strong> hegemonic forms (Corrigan, Markowitz, & Watson,<br />

2004; Parker & Aggleton, 2003).<br />

While acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> key roles that psychological<br />

<strong>and</strong> macrosocial forces play <strong>in</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>’s manifestation, currently<br />

miss<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> literature is a deepened articulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> social aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> might<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>the</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> both <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>and</strong><br />

collective actors as def<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> a local context. This<br />

paper seeks to more deeply illum<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>stigma</strong>’s social<br />

elements through exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g how <strong>the</strong> cultural phenomenon<br />

<strong>of</strong> ‘face’, by represent<strong>in</strong>g a person’s moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> community, leads to <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a. We seek to reveal through an <strong>in</strong>-depth analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

‘face’: (1) how one’s moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g is lodged with<strong>in</strong> a local<br />

social world; (2) how one’s status as a ‘moral’ community<br />

member is cont<strong>in</strong>gent upon uphold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>trapersonal <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terpersonal (social-transactional) obligations <strong>and</strong>; (3)<br />

how loss <strong>of</strong> face <strong>and</strong> accompany<strong>in</strong>g fears <strong>of</strong> moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

might lead to a ‘social death’. We fur<strong>the</strong>r exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />

how ‘face’ <strong>and</strong> moral status <strong>in</strong>teract with <strong>stigma</strong> by exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

schizophrenia <strong>and</strong> AIDS <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Through our analysis,<br />

we present a conceptual model describ<strong>in</strong>g how changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g lead to negative outcomes <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>and</strong><br />

provide culture-specific recommendations for combat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>stigma</strong> by restor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> moral status <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong><br />

families at <strong>the</strong> local level. We conclude by propos<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

<strong>the</strong> face dynamic reveals novel ways <strong>of</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>stigma</strong>’s<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g nature across culturesdthat <strong>stigma</strong> at its<br />

essence is a moral process (i.e., threatens what matters<br />

most for those <strong>in</strong> a local world) <strong>and</strong> that <strong>stigma</strong> jeopardizes<br />

an actor’s ability to mobilize network resources (or ‘social<br />

capital’) to atta<strong>in</strong> essential social statuses.<br />

‘Face’ as a physical, emotional, social <strong>and</strong> moral<br />

process <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese society<br />

We utilize conceptual writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> empirical studies on<br />

‘face’ <strong>and</strong> social exchange to advance underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>stigma</strong> formation <strong>in</strong> local Ch<strong>in</strong>ese communities. We first<br />

draw from Ch<strong>in</strong>ese texts <strong>and</strong> ethnographies that describe<br />

<strong>the</strong> requisite process <strong>of</strong> human ‘cultivation’ before one<br />

can achieve status as a fully ‘moral’ person (Lau, 1984; Stafford,<br />

1995). We <strong>the</strong>n <strong>in</strong>tegrate f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from ethnographies<br />

<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r empirical studies that describe how socialexchange<br />

networks <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a are strictly organized based<br />

on <strong>the</strong> reciprocation <strong>of</strong> favors, moral position<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong><br />

‘face’ (Fei, 1992; Kipnis,1997; Yan, 1996). We fur<strong>the</strong>r ground<br />

<strong>the</strong>se Ch<strong>in</strong>ese constructs with<strong>in</strong> a <strong>the</strong>oretical framework <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> capital articulated by Bourdieu<br />

(1986), particularly that <strong>of</strong> social capital (Szreter & Woolcock,<br />

2004). We conclude this section by discuss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

severe social consequences that loss <strong>of</strong> face entails for <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

<strong>and</strong> networks.<br />

For purposes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory-build<strong>in</strong>g, we depict an ideal case<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> ‘moral persons’ <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. However, this<br />

social dynamic <strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> ‘face’ are currently be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />

contested <strong>and</strong> reconstructed. <strong>The</strong> transition to a market<br />

economy – <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an emergent private sector, new<br />

foreign <strong>in</strong>vestment, <strong>and</strong> imported cultural media (films,<br />

music) – has greatly reshaped traditional Ch<strong>in</strong>ese society<br />

(Yan, 2003). <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>flux <strong>of</strong> Western norms <strong>and</strong> values has<br />

led to evolv<strong>in</strong>g conceptualizations <strong>of</strong> filial piety for contemporary<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese (Lieber, Nihira, & M<strong>in</strong>k, 2004); additionally,<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ship has been supplanted by familiarity ties as <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

medium to build social networks (Yang, 1994). However,<br />

<strong>the</strong> notion that unique cultural patterns <strong>of</strong> modernization<br />

<strong>in</strong> Asia (or ‘‘Easternization’’; Marsella & Choi, 1993) occur<br />

suggests that Ch<strong>in</strong>a might reta<strong>in</strong> important psychological,<br />

social, <strong>and</strong> cultural structures even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> rapid technological<br />

<strong>and</strong> economic advancement. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

psychological processes enable preservation <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese orientations while simultaneously allow<strong>in</strong>g adaptation<br />

to societal change (Yang, 1998). Hence, we assert<br />

that atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ‘moral’ status <strong>and</strong> uphold<strong>in</strong>g face will rema<strong>in</strong><br />

salient to modern-day Ch<strong>in</strong>ese, even as <strong>the</strong>se values are<br />

transform<strong>in</strong>g as a function <strong>of</strong> modernization. To <strong>the</strong> degree<br />

<strong>the</strong>se dynamics become attenuated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> years ahead may<br />

limit <strong>the</strong>ir future <strong>in</strong>fluence yet still not remove <strong>the</strong>ir legitimacy<br />

as core cultural orientations.<br />

Different roads <strong>of</strong> identification lead<strong>in</strong>g to adult (moral) status<br />

Stafford (1995) <strong>in</strong> his ethnography <strong>of</strong> childhood education<br />

<strong>in</strong> Angang (a fish<strong>in</strong>g village <strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern Taiwan),<br />

describes how children must undergo extensive cultivation<br />

before be<strong>in</strong>g recognized as hav<strong>in</strong>g adult status. <strong>The</strong> popular<br />

view <strong>of</strong> children is that <strong>the</strong>y are not yet full persons (chengren<br />

or adult, literally translates as ‘completed persons’;<br />

Stafford, 1995, p. 19). Most importantly, children are not<br />

regarded as fully formed morally. Stafford expla<strong>in</strong>s how<br />

children learn ‘everyday’ morality transmitted through<br />

family life <strong>and</strong> ‘ord<strong>in</strong>ary’ morality through formal education.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, Stafford describes <strong>the</strong> socialization <strong>of</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese children as first be<strong>in</strong>g a natural process that<br />

emphasizes certa<strong>in</strong> types <strong>of</strong> identification <strong>and</strong> second,<br />

a ‘Confucian’ process <strong>in</strong> which children achieve status as<br />

full-fledged human be<strong>in</strong>gs through learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> selfcultivation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> community immerses <strong>the</strong> child <strong>in</strong> a compulsory<br />

educational process to learn established cultural patterns<br />

<strong>and</strong> to conform to social roles that organize <strong>in</strong>terpersonal<br />

life (Fei, 1992). Morality is transmitted as ‘ord<strong>in</strong>ary knowledge’<br />

<strong>and</strong> appears ‘not to be taught’. Perhaps most powerfully<br />

embedded with<strong>in</strong> everyday life, parents <strong>and</strong> children<br />

are obligated to provide for one ano<strong>the</strong>r. Parents first raise<br />

children. Children <strong>the</strong>n perform filial obligations through<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> family transactions (a ‘learn<strong>in</strong>g environment’).<br />

Adherence to filial obedience becomes so <strong>in</strong>gra<strong>in</strong>ed that it<br />

is perceived as someth<strong>in</strong>g which simply ‘should be done’<br />

( y<strong>in</strong>ggai zuode) (Stafford, 1995, p. 82). To not provide<br />

food for one’s parents merits public scorn – e.g., a common<br />

taunt <strong>in</strong> rural Taiwan is to mock a useless person as a ‘rice<br />

pot’ – i.e., <strong>the</strong>y only eat rice <strong>and</strong> do not produce it (to feed<br />

parents) (Stafford, 1995, p. 96). This obligation to keep parents<br />

well-fed cont<strong>in</strong>ues even after death (through religious<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong>ir spirits; Kipnis, 1997). If this duty is<br />

neglected, <strong>the</strong>se spirits are thought to become hungry<br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011


ghosts who must be placated by <strong>the</strong> general community.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r parental obligations <strong>in</strong>clude produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>eage, provid<strong>in</strong>g lifetime f<strong>in</strong>ancial support,<br />

<strong>and</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g rituals to ensure that support is susta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> next life. This process is thus an ‘‘.immersion <strong>in</strong> a system<br />

<strong>of</strong> total support (economic, social <strong>and</strong> spiritual),’’ <strong>and</strong><br />

placement <strong>in</strong>to ‘‘.an eternal cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> filial children’’ (Stafford,<br />

1995, p. 86). Yan (2003) has shown that <strong>the</strong>se filial<br />

obligations are weaken<strong>in</strong>g, at least <strong>in</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ch<strong>in</strong>a;<br />

none<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong>y rema<strong>in</strong> ideals, albeit less effective ones.<br />

In contrast to everyday immersion <strong>in</strong> morality, schools<br />

utilize texts that convey dist<strong>in</strong>ct moral rules. Confucian philosophy,<br />

which is commonly transmitted through school<br />

texts, states that commitment to learn<strong>in</strong>g (i.e., achiev<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cultural competence <strong>and</strong> literacy), or self-cultivation, is<br />

essential to <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> properly becom<strong>in</strong>g human. A<br />

fifth-grade textbook <strong>in</strong> Taiwan entitled, ‘‘Study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />

Be<strong>in</strong>g a Person’’ (Qiuxue yu zuoren), emphasizes that <strong>the</strong>se<br />

two values are <strong>in</strong>separable. Modern Taiwanese textbooks<br />

teach a version <strong>of</strong> traditional Ch<strong>in</strong>ese morality emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a moral cont<strong>in</strong>uity from xiao (filial obedience) extend<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

zhong (loyalty/patriotism). Indeed, Tu (1987) states that<br />

‘‘<strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al Confucian <strong>in</strong>tention.is <strong>the</strong> moralization <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> person <strong>in</strong> human relationships’’ (p. 71).<br />

Through <strong>the</strong> everyday <strong>and</strong> formal teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> morality,<br />

children learn how to engage <strong>in</strong> properly ordered human<br />

relationships. Fei (1992) underscores that to become<br />

a true adult is to be connected to o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> to uphold<br />

obligations as def<strong>in</strong>ed by one’s social relationships; failure<br />

to do so is ‘‘to be less than human’’ (p. 25). Thus, participat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> reciprocal familial obligations, achiev<strong>in</strong>g cultivation<br />

through education, <strong>and</strong> becom<strong>in</strong>g a full member <strong>of</strong> a community<br />

constitute achiev<strong>in</strong>g good, adult or ‘moral’ status.<br />

Fundamental characteristics <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese social organization<br />

Fei’s (1992) classic text written from a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese anthropologist’s<br />

viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, describes Ch<strong>in</strong>ese society as consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

‘‘webs woven out <strong>of</strong> countless personal relationships’’<br />

(p. 78). <strong>The</strong>se overlapp<strong>in</strong>g arrangements <strong>of</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>able,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividually centered networks connect each member <strong>of</strong><br />

society <strong>in</strong> multiple ways with vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees <strong>of</strong> attachment<br />

(K<strong>in</strong>g, 1994). A network’s size is established by <strong>the</strong><br />

authority <strong>of</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dividual center; <strong>the</strong> greater a person’s<br />

prestige, <strong>the</strong> denser his or her web <strong>of</strong> horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical<br />

network relations. <strong>The</strong>se networks are highly elastic <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong><br />

or contract <strong>in</strong> response to changes <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s<br />

social power. ‘‘Inner’’ networks consist <strong>of</strong> family <strong>and</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ship<br />

ties 1 which overlap with sets <strong>of</strong> ‘‘outer networks’’ (e.g.,<br />

classmates, friends <strong>of</strong> friends, <strong>and</strong> people from <strong>the</strong> same<br />

region). <strong>The</strong> projection <strong>of</strong> closely def<strong>in</strong>ed k<strong>in</strong>ship relations<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten occurs among <strong>in</strong>timate non-family members, who<br />

are treated as ‘practical k<strong>in</strong>’ (Yang, 1994).<br />

Fei fur<strong>the</strong>r emphasized <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> adherence to<br />

rituals – by develop<strong>in</strong>g self-restra<strong>in</strong>t through rituals, moral<br />

1 Fei describes families as ‘‘small l<strong>in</strong>eages’’ to illustrate how <strong>the</strong> nuclear<br />

family is but one circle among a structure <strong>of</strong> multiple concentric social<br />

circles <strong>and</strong> to underscore <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>herent long-term cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

families.<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11 3<br />

character is <strong>the</strong>n cultivated. Only after achiev<strong>in</strong>g selfcontrol<br />

can one extend <strong>in</strong>to outer circles <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal<br />

relationships. Control thus takes place from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>side<br />

spread<strong>in</strong>g outward – if one upholds one’s morality followed<br />

by his or her close relations (i.e., family), <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> state <strong>and</strong><br />

entire world will be <strong>in</strong> order. In Confucian tradition, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

l<strong>in</strong>eage networks thus become ‘‘<strong>the</strong> medium through<br />

which all activities ‘<strong>and</strong> social structures’ are organized’’<br />

(Fei, 1992, p. 84).<br />

Correction immediately takes place when failure to<br />

learn any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se obligations occurs. Any <strong>in</strong>dividual’s failure<br />

to act appropriately implies that <strong>the</strong> associated social<br />

circle (e.g., parents, teachers, even an entire village) has<br />

not provided proper guidance. Everyone <strong>in</strong> a network<br />

supervises <strong>the</strong> actions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong><br />

obligation are <strong>in</strong>ternalized as follow<strong>in</strong>g one’s heart <strong>and</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>d. Aga<strong>in</strong>, recent research <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a suggests that connections<br />

are becom<strong>in</strong>g more pragmatic, but that <strong>the</strong>y still<br />

reta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir structur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> social life (Yan, 2003).<br />

Reciprocity, ‘guanxi’, ‘renq<strong>in</strong>g’ <strong>and</strong> ‘face’<br />

Reciprocity, particularly among family members <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>n society, thus is viewed as a core pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that governs<br />

everyday social behavior <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Yang (1957) first def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> reciprocity (bao) as <strong>the</strong> basis for<br />

social relations. Giv<strong>in</strong>g gifts (liwu) can be viewed as ‘‘<strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tersubjective medium <strong>of</strong> social transactions <strong>in</strong> local moral<br />

worlds’’ (Kle<strong>in</strong>man & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 1991, p. 277). Gift-giv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

constitutes guanxi, or <strong>the</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> one’s network <strong>of</strong><br />

social connections as def<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> gift-exchange.<br />

Guanxi was <strong>in</strong>itially viewed as personal strategies used to<br />

construct ‘particularistic ties’ (Jacobs, 1979) <strong>and</strong> subsequently<br />

was exp<strong>and</strong>ed to <strong>in</strong>clude elements <strong>of</strong> personal feel<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that accompany <strong>in</strong>strumental <strong>in</strong>tentions (Walder,<br />

1986). 2 More recently, Yan (1996) fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>corporated<br />

<strong>the</strong> centrality <strong>of</strong> moral duties to fulfill obligations as well<br />

as affective <strong>and</strong> economic <strong>in</strong>volvement. Guanxi networks<br />

thus function as <strong>the</strong> objective foundation <strong>of</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dividual’s<br />

local world <strong>and</strong> consist <strong>of</strong> relationships that are cont<strong>in</strong>ually<br />

reproduced through purposeful human efforts.<br />

Decid<strong>in</strong>g who to accept favors from demarcates one’s<br />

range <strong>of</strong> obligations (<strong>and</strong> membership <strong>in</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r’s guanxi<br />

web; K<strong>in</strong>g, 1994). Even shar<strong>in</strong>g food with non-k<strong>in</strong> may be<br />

seen as public acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g guanxi; <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a, public banquets are explicit mechanisms to produce<br />

<strong>and</strong> hold onto extrafamilial guanxi (Yang, 1994). Counterbalanc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

such material exchange, <strong>the</strong> direct <strong>embodiment</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> human feel<strong>in</strong>gs, or ganq<strong>in</strong>g, also plays a particularly<br />

strong role <strong>in</strong> guanxi formation. Thus, publicly weep<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

a funeral is a way <strong>of</strong> claim<strong>in</strong>g relationship to <strong>the</strong> deceased<br />

<strong>and</strong> his or her family (Kipnis, 1997).<br />

Also critically <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> fundamental concepts<br />

<strong>of</strong> reciprocity <strong>and</strong> guanxi is <strong>the</strong> key social norm <strong>of</strong><br />

renq<strong>in</strong>g, or ‘‘a system <strong>of</strong> ethics based on commonsense<br />

knowledge’’ <strong>of</strong> society (Yan, 1996, p. 21), where<br />

2 Yang (1994) also presented guanxi networks as an <strong>in</strong>formal redistributive<br />

power that opposes <strong>the</strong> universalistic distributive ethics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> socialist<br />

state.<br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011


4<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpersonal relations consist <strong>of</strong> both moral <strong>and</strong> emotional<br />

components. In everyday social practice, renq<strong>in</strong>g can be<br />

understood as <strong>the</strong> exchange <strong>of</strong> favors – by repay<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

owed favor with a bigger favor, o<strong>the</strong>rs owe that person<br />

future favors. Obligations must eventually reach a balance<br />

between parties, although to actually settle accounts fully<br />

is to end a relationship, because if favors are not owed, no<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r communication is needed (Yang, 1994). However,<br />

renq<strong>in</strong>g is not simply a matter <strong>of</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g reciprocity<br />

but also embodies <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g overlapp<strong>in</strong>g concepts: (1)<br />

underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g basic emotional responses <strong>in</strong> everyday<br />

social situations; (2) moral duties associated with giftexchange;<br />

(3) a type <strong>of</strong> exchangeable social resource (i.e.,<br />

favor) <strong>and</strong>; (4) one’s guanxi networks (Yan, 2003). Renq<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is based upon <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g (zhanguang or ‘‘to share<br />

<strong>the</strong> light’’); one is morally obligated to share social<br />

resources with network members, which is expressed <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> gives mean<strong>in</strong>g to everyday gift-giv<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Renq<strong>in</strong>g is based upon one’s social ‘face’ (mianzi), or<br />

<strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> social power <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal field<br />

(Hwang, 1987). Renq<strong>in</strong>g first depends on mianzi – one<br />

must <strong>in</strong>itially possess sufficient mianzi to face o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong><br />

to create social networks. Renq<strong>in</strong>g also reflects mianzi –<br />

e.g., at formal ceremonies (wedd<strong>in</strong>gs, funerals), social<br />

status is exhibited by <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> guests <strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

<strong>and</strong> emotional <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>gs provided, thus embody<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> entirety <strong>of</strong> social connections that a family possesses.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, social-transactional dynamics (renq<strong>in</strong>g) are<br />

<strong>in</strong>extricably <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>ed with one’s social status or mianzi.<br />

More recent conceptualizations fur<strong>the</strong>r l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong> construct<br />

<strong>of</strong> moral face, or lian, with <strong>the</strong> deeply embedded<br />

moral obligations located <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> everyday economy <strong>of</strong> reciprocity<br />

<strong>and</strong> social exchange. For example, Yan (2003)<br />

states that, ‘‘One’s failure to fulfill <strong>the</strong> obligation <strong>of</strong> reciprocity,<br />

or to show no consideration for o<strong>the</strong>rs’ feel<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>and</strong> emotional responses, is regarded as an immoral act’’<br />

(p. 39). Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, moral face consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group’s evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a person’s moral reputation, record for fulfill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

social-exchange obligations, <strong>and</strong> status as a good human<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g (Yan, 1996). Lian can thus be seen as reflect<strong>in</strong>g one’s<br />

moral status <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> local world <strong>and</strong> consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

<strong>and</strong> external prohibitions for moral behaviors. 3 <strong>The</strong> awareness<br />

<strong>of</strong> moral face guides participants’ actions <strong>in</strong> social<br />

exchange <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>jects a moral discourse to social life.<br />

Face <strong>and</strong> guanxi as symbolic <strong>and</strong> social capital<br />

Before discuss<strong>in</strong>g how loss <strong>of</strong> face affects participants <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir local worlds, we use <strong>the</strong>oretical constructs set forth by<br />

<strong>the</strong> late French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu <strong>in</strong> his analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> mechanisms by which dom<strong>in</strong>ant classes reproduce<br />

structures <strong>of</strong> power, to deepen underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social<br />

constructs <strong>of</strong> guanxi, renq<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> face. We specifically identify<br />

how <strong>the</strong>se Ch<strong>in</strong>ese constructs might map onto different<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> capital that are accumulated, <strong>and</strong> traded, with<strong>in</strong><br />

societies. We do so to fur<strong>the</strong>r ground <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

3 Social face, or mianzi, represents one’s social prestige ga<strong>the</strong>red via<br />

personal effort or strategic maneuver<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> is based entirely on external<br />

evaluations (Hu, 1944).<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese concepts with<strong>in</strong> a deep <strong>and</strong> systematized social analytic<br />

framework <strong>and</strong> to locate <strong>the</strong>se constructs as local examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> what might represent more universal processes.<br />

Capital is broadly conceptualized by Bourdieu as materialized<br />

<strong>and</strong> convertible ‘social energy’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

labor or accumulated labor <strong>in</strong> an objectified state (Bourdieu,<br />

1986). Face – both moral (lian) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular social<br />

face (mianzi) – can be seen to function as forms <strong>of</strong> symbolic<br />

capital. Such capital (e.g., mianzi as ascribed status accumulated<br />

via effort or clever <strong>in</strong>terpersonal maneuver<strong>in</strong>g) is represented<br />

symbolically because it is set with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> known<br />

‘logic’ <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, is not perceived as capital per se, <strong>and</strong><br />

is <strong>in</strong>stead recognized as a legitimate form <strong>of</strong> competence.<br />

<strong>The</strong> possession <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se forms <strong>of</strong> symbolic capital<br />

are necessary to access <strong>and</strong> to mobilize network resources<br />

(e.g., ideas, <strong>in</strong>formation, money, favors), or social capital.<br />

Analogous to guanxi with<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese societies, social capital<br />

is comprised <strong>of</strong> social obligations (‘‘connections’’), <strong>and</strong><br />

is def<strong>in</strong>ed by Bourdieu (1986) as ‘‘<strong>the</strong> aggregate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

actual or potential resources which are l<strong>in</strong>ked to possession<br />

<strong>of</strong> a durable network.or to membership <strong>in</strong> a group’’ (p.<br />

248). <strong>The</strong> entire social capital held by an <strong>in</strong>dividual is determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> network <strong>of</strong> connections that can be<br />

accessed <strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total capital possessed<br />

by each network member. 4 Each member derives status<br />

from <strong>the</strong>ir potential access to <strong>the</strong> collectively owned capital.<br />

<strong>The</strong> core ‘credential’ that allows <strong>in</strong>dividuals membership<br />

<strong>in</strong>to guanxi (or social capital) networks <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is<br />

cultivation <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>of</strong> moral face (lian). Once<br />

guanxi is established, <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> social face (mianzi)<br />

one possesses <strong>the</strong>n determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> total network resources<br />

that can be mobilized. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Bourdieu, <strong>and</strong> exemplified<br />

by guanxi webs <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, networks <strong>of</strong> social capital are<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> material <strong>and</strong>/or symbolic exchanges which act<br />

to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> re<strong>in</strong>force <strong>the</strong>m. Be<strong>in</strong>g a member <strong>of</strong> a guanxi<br />

network, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>reby establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> reproduc<strong>in</strong>g social<br />

capital to secure material or symbolic pr<strong>of</strong>its, is based on<br />

endless acts <strong>of</strong> sociability <strong>and</strong> series <strong>of</strong> exchanges (<strong>of</strong> gifts,<br />

feel<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>and</strong> words).<br />

Utiliz<strong>in</strong>g frameworks that fur<strong>the</strong>r del<strong>in</strong>eate attributes <strong>of</strong><br />

social capital reveal that guanxi conta<strong>in</strong>s both components<br />

<strong>of</strong> ‘cognitive’ (i.e., perceptions <strong>of</strong> trust, reciprocity <strong>and</strong> support)<br />

<strong>and</strong> ‘structural’ (i.e., extent <strong>of</strong> network l<strong>in</strong>ks or activity)<br />

social capital (Harpham, Grant, & Thomas, 2002).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, guanxi ties may also comprise ‘bond<strong>in</strong>g’ (cooperative<br />

relations between group members who share similar<br />

social identities) <strong>and</strong> ‘bridg<strong>in</strong>g’ (social relations that span<br />

across dist<strong>in</strong>ct socio-demographic groups, such as class)<br />

types (Szreter & Woolcock, 2004). At <strong>the</strong>se formulations’<br />

root, however, is <strong>the</strong> view that social capital is as an ‘accumulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> trust’ that results from <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ will<strong>in</strong>gness<br />

to cooperate with one ano<strong>the</strong>r via norms <strong>of</strong> reciprocity that<br />

facilitate collective action (Putnam, 1993). Such trust <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

groups forms <strong>the</strong> prerequisite for social capital to be<br />

4 <strong>The</strong>orists debate whe<strong>the</strong>r social capital can more accurately be described<br />

as a property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social structure or <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

social environment. To depict guanxi dynamics <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, we utilize Putnam’s<br />

(1993) view that social capital can be conceptualized at a relational<br />

level – that it is a property <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals but only due to <strong>the</strong>ir association<br />

with a group (Szreter & Woolcock, 2004).<br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011


transformed <strong>in</strong>to economic capital (i.e., goods that can be<br />

directly changed <strong>in</strong>to money; Bourdieu, 1986) or <strong>the</strong> direct<br />

‘social energy’ <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, which is why face is so prized, <strong>and</strong><br />

safeguarded, <strong>in</strong> everyday usage.<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> face <strong>and</strong> its effects on <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> networks<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> face (e.g., among those who violate key reciprocity<br />

norms) greatly affects an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s access to social<br />

capital <strong>and</strong> closely parallels how <strong>stigma</strong> works <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

society. <strong>The</strong> motivation to preserve face <strong>of</strong>ten causes adherence<br />

to moral obligations over economic considerations. To<br />

ga<strong>in</strong> a reputation for not participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> gift-exchange<br />

would result <strong>in</strong> los<strong>in</strong>g community trust <strong>and</strong> becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />

isolated without adequate guanxi, which is felt as greatly<br />

embarrass<strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, a popular say<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese village states, ‘‘Suili (obligatory, expressive giftgiv<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

is as urgent as putt<strong>in</strong>g out a fire. It can’t wait. A<br />

man cannot have a firm position <strong>in</strong> front <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs if he fails<br />

to follow <strong>the</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> gift-giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> escapes his duties<br />

(Yan, 1996, p. 76)’’.<br />

Because obligations <strong>of</strong> reciprocity are cultivated s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

childhood, to publicly neglect such obligations is to lose<br />

moral face (lian). To lose lian (diu lian) represents <strong>the</strong> community’s<br />

condemnation for immoral behavior, <strong>and</strong> signifies<br />

‘‘a serious <strong>in</strong>fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral code <strong>of</strong> society’’ (Hu, 1944,<br />

p. 46). To enact such behavior is to act atrociously <strong>and</strong> to be<br />

morally bankrupt, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a depreciation <strong>of</strong> character. 5<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> lian results <strong>in</strong> potential community ostracization –<br />

for <strong>in</strong>stance, isolation dur<strong>in</strong>g important rituals such as<br />

funerals. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> mere threat <strong>of</strong> sanctions typically<br />

leads <strong>of</strong>fenders to reform <strong>the</strong>ir behavior (Fei, 1992).<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> lian also br<strong>in</strong>gs immediate shame to <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fender.<br />

Affect is essential to moral face; a person’s aspirations to<br />

become a moral person are based on feel<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> shame<br />

(chi – Lau, 1984). To lose lian is to experience real dread<br />

that is felt even more strongly than physical fear (Hu,<br />

1944). Yan (1996) provides an example <strong>of</strong> an elder bro<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>in</strong> rural Ch<strong>in</strong>a who failed to live up to a wedd<strong>in</strong>g gift-giv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ritual (<strong>the</strong> most important gift-exchange event); hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

exhausted his money on earlier gift-giv<strong>in</strong>g rounds, he became<br />

filled with unbearable shame <strong>and</strong> fled <strong>the</strong> wedd<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce lian signifies <strong>the</strong> community’s confidence <strong>in</strong> one’s<br />

moral character, severe loss <strong>of</strong> lian places <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

<strong>and</strong> family <strong>in</strong> a despised <strong>and</strong> isolated position. Those who<br />

fail to cultivate guanxi networks are assigned a severely disadvantaged<br />

status, a solitary state viewed as ‘disastrous’<br />

(Kipnis, 1997). To represent <strong>the</strong> ‘social death’ l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />

such persons (<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir associates), Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ch<strong>in</strong>ese terms<br />

use ‘death’ (si) as a modifier (e.g., sipi – ‘‘dead sk<strong>in</strong>’’, six<strong>in</strong>g –<br />

‘‘dead characters’’) to describe <strong>the</strong> closed opportunities <strong>of</strong><br />

such <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ social networks (Yan,1996). One especially<br />

illustrative term – si menzi – means ‘‘dead (closed) doors’’. By<br />

contrast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> popular phrase <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g one’s connections to<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> resources, or ‘‘go<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> back door’’ (zou<br />

homen; K<strong>in</strong>g, 1994), si menzi is a metaphor that describes<br />

5 Loss <strong>of</strong> mianzi (diu mianzi) results from neglect<strong>in</strong>g a social convention<br />

that does not impugn one’s character <strong>and</strong> produces milder shame. Los<strong>in</strong>g<br />

moral face (lian), however, causes complete loss <strong>of</strong> social face (mianzi).<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11 5<br />

a relationship lead<strong>in</strong>g to no fur<strong>the</strong>r resources. Not only are<br />

si menzi without a guanxi network (or from Bourdieu’s<br />

perspective, without social capital), <strong>the</strong>y are also seen as<br />

‘‘not know<strong>in</strong>g how to be a human be<strong>in</strong>g’’ (buhui zuoren) <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>in</strong> conduct<strong>in</strong>g basic human relations<br />

(Yan, 1996, p. 103). <strong>The</strong>se <strong>in</strong>dividuals face severe social<br />

sanctions <strong>and</strong> isolation from <strong>the</strong>ir local world.<br />

<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> ‘death’ to describe <strong>in</strong>dividuals with whom<br />

one derives no benefit <strong>and</strong> risks moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation illustrates<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r critical facet <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese social life – that danger<br />

is felt to be highly contagious. Exposure to <strong>in</strong>auspicious<br />

(bujili) circumstances (e.g., funerals) endangers one via<br />

malicious <strong>in</strong>fluences (e.g., ghosts, which are a part <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

popular culture) <strong>and</strong> pollution <strong>of</strong> associated networks.<br />

For example, families who have recently experienced<br />

a death are isolated by <strong>the</strong> community for some time, <strong>and</strong><br />

even those who merely attend a funeral will not be <strong>in</strong>vited<br />

to happy events (e.g., wedd<strong>in</strong>gs) due to fears <strong>of</strong> spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bad luck or moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation (Stafford, 1995).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se examples highlight an essential aspect <strong>of</strong> guanxi<br />

networks – that designat<strong>in</strong>g people as friends means categoriz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs as enemies. Guanxi-build<strong>in</strong>g is as much<br />

about utiliz<strong>in</strong>g strategies <strong>of</strong> exclusion <strong>and</strong> distanc<strong>in</strong>g as it<br />

is about <strong>in</strong>ternal shar<strong>in</strong>g – e.g., a boss (laoban) will not<br />

allow those perceived as too low <strong>in</strong> status to banquet<br />

with him (Kipnis, 1997). O<strong>the</strong>rs note that face does not<br />

imply equal status but <strong>in</strong>stead ‘‘.functions as a site from<br />

which hierarchical communication is possible’’ (Zito, 1987,<br />

p. 119). How guanxi, renq<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> face come to be constructed<br />

thus powerfully reflect local processes <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion,<br />

exclusion, <strong>and</strong> power <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> schizophrenia <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

To illustrate how <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> is <strong>in</strong>terwoven<br />

with loss <strong>of</strong> face <strong>and</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, we discuss two <strong>stigma</strong>tized<br />

conditions – schizophrenia <strong>and</strong> AIDS – <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

Sociopolitically, Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s delay <strong>in</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g a national mental<br />

health law that clearly del<strong>in</strong>eates <strong>the</strong> legal rights <strong>of</strong> people<br />

with mental illness <strong>and</strong> guarantees access to treatment<br />

(Shan, 2007) contributes to negative stereotyp<strong>in</strong>g, anticipated<br />

devaluation, <strong>and</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation reported by people<br />

with schizophrenia across multiple life doma<strong>in</strong>s (Yang<br />

et al., 2007). Yet <strong>the</strong> traditional viewpo<strong>in</strong>t that cultivation<br />

<strong>of</strong> restra<strong>in</strong>t is <strong>in</strong>tegral to moral character fur<strong>the</strong>r shapes<br />

how mental illness <strong>stigma</strong> is felt. In Confucian thought,<br />

one must learn to control oneself before exert<strong>in</strong>g social<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence (Lau, 1984). Partly due to public beliefs <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

that people with mental illness act dangerously <strong>and</strong> unpredictably<br />

(Phillips & Gao, 1999), we propose that such persons<br />

are viewed as not fully cultivated <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

<strong>in</strong>competent to participate <strong>in</strong> social life. People with psychiatric<br />

illness are thought to exhibit a ‘moral bankruptcy’ that<br />

relegates <strong>the</strong>m to a moral level <strong>of</strong> not fully ‘adult’ status.<br />

Etiological beliefs <strong>of</strong> mental illness fur<strong>the</strong>r assign a moral<br />

‘defect’ to sufferers <strong>and</strong> families (Yang, 2007); popular Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

beliefs imply that hav<strong>in</strong>g mental illness <strong>in</strong> this lifetime<br />

entails moral wrongdo<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a prior life (Stafford, 1995).<br />

That people with schizophrenia are not regarded as fully<br />

competent morally is depicted by suicide surveys <strong>in</strong> rural<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a not count<strong>in</strong>g such <strong>in</strong>dividuals (Wu, 2005).<br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011


6<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> perceived <strong>in</strong>competence – that a person with<br />

schizophrenia will embarrass <strong>the</strong> family <strong>and</strong> lower <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

moral status – families <strong>and</strong> health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals express<br />

<strong>stigma</strong> via <strong>in</strong>fantiliz<strong>in</strong>g responses. This attitude is evident<br />

among 63% <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g psychiatric hospital<br />

nurses who agreed that people with mental illness<br />

‘‘.need <strong>the</strong> same k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> control <strong>and</strong> discipl<strong>in</strong>e as a young<br />

child’’ (Sevigny et al., 1999). Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese psychiatric<br />

hospital patients have been made to s<strong>in</strong>g songs <strong>and</strong><br />

dance like children <strong>in</strong> a classroom (Pearson, 1995). Fur<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

emotional attitudes <strong>of</strong> family members towards schizophrenia<br />

patients are predom<strong>in</strong>antly those <strong>of</strong> emotional<br />

over<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>and</strong> overprotectiveness ra<strong>the</strong>r than outright<br />

criticism <strong>and</strong> hostility (Yang, 2003). This <strong>and</strong> related<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation lead to underm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

patient’s self-confidence (endorsed by >88% <strong>of</strong> subjects <strong>in</strong><br />

a Beij<strong>in</strong>g patient sample; Phillips & Gao, 1999). Such <strong>in</strong>fantilization<br />

leads to loss <strong>of</strong> aspirations, which contributes to<br />

concrete practical losses such as failure to achieve marriage<br />

<strong>and</strong> employment. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, people with schizophrenia<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a have employment rates roughly half that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

age group, are almost twice as likely not to get married,<br />

<strong>and</strong> experience divorce rates nearly 10 times <strong>the</strong> population<br />

norm (Phillips, 1993). To not marry <strong>and</strong> not have children<br />

is viewed as a fur<strong>the</strong>r ‘‘.move towards achiev<strong>in</strong>g<br />

non-personhood’’ (Stafford, 1995, p. 28).<br />

Due to moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation, people with mental illness<br />

are excluded from participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> renq<strong>in</strong>g, or basic human<br />

reciprocity. For example, Hong Kong respondents are overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

more likely to agree that it ‘‘.would not be<br />

wise to show any favors’’ (thus <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> one’s<br />

guanxi web) to a person with schizophrenia when compared<br />

with non-Ch<strong>in</strong>ese British respondents (Furnham &<br />

Chan, 2004). Stigma <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a also quickly moves from <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual to his/her family, which threatens to break <strong>the</strong><br />

vital connections (‘quanxi wang’) l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g families to social<br />

networks <strong>of</strong> resources <strong>and</strong> life chances. For example, over<br />

a majority (54.3%) <strong>of</strong> 1491 relatives <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

patients <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a reported experienc<strong>in</strong>g at least some<br />

adverse effects from <strong>stigma</strong> (Phillips, Pearson, Li, Xu, &<br />

Yang, 2002). <strong>The</strong> entire social network is fur<strong>the</strong>r viewed<br />

as <strong>in</strong>auspicious or contam<strong>in</strong>ated, <strong>of</strong>ten lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />

expulsion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>and</strong> family to protect<br />

<strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g network. Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, between 59 <strong>and</strong><br />

69% <strong>of</strong> patient samples <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong <strong>and</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g report<br />

that <strong>stigma</strong> leads families to deny or hide <strong>the</strong> mental illness<br />

(Lee, Lee, Chiu, & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 2005; Phillips & Gao, 1999),<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> delays <strong>and</strong> non-adherence to psychiatric treatment<br />

(Lee, Chiu, Tsang, Chui, & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 2006).<br />

‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> AIDS <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

<strong>The</strong> moral weight associated with HIV/AIDS <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a is greatly compounded by views common across cultures<br />

that immoral behaviors give rise to HIV-positive status.<br />

That <strong>the</strong>se moral components supersede even concerns<br />

<strong>of</strong> illness <strong>in</strong>fection is suggested by Mak et al. (2006) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

Hong Kong study which revealed much greater <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> general population towards HIV/AIDS when compared<br />

with tuberculosis <strong>and</strong> SARS (Mak et al., 2006). Such moral<br />

judgments commonly focus on behaviors perceived to be<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />

associated with HIV, such as drug use, commercial sex, or<br />

homosexuality. For example, <strong>in</strong> a separate Hong Kong sample,<br />

a significant proportion believed that people with HIV/<br />

AIDS were sexually promiscuous (Lau & Tsui, 2005). Fur<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

<strong>in</strong> a study <strong>of</strong> pregnant women from Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

(<strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce with <strong>the</strong> highest reported prevalence <strong>of</strong> HIV),<br />

nearly half felt that AIDS was solely a disease <strong>of</strong> ‘‘low class<br />

<strong>and</strong> illegal people’’ (Hesketh, Duo, Li, & Tomk<strong>in</strong>s, 2005).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se perceptions are fueled by Ch<strong>in</strong>ese media depictions<br />

<strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS patients as act<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>and</strong> immoral<br />

ways (i.e., as <strong>in</strong>tentionally <strong>in</strong>fect<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>rs; J<strong>in</strong>g, 2006).<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> severe moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation from such<br />

behavior, lian is immediately threatened through depreciation<br />

<strong>of</strong> moral character result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> potential social exclusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> families. S<strong>in</strong>ce 80% <strong>of</strong> all HIV/AIDS<br />

cases occur <strong>in</strong> rural regions, <strong>the</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> los<strong>in</strong>g moral<br />

face may rema<strong>in</strong> particularly strong (He & Detels, 2005).<br />

Moral judgments give rise to <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g community<br />

beliefs, with up to 75–81% <strong>of</strong> subjects <strong>in</strong> Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

endors<strong>in</strong>g at least some social distance towards people<br />

with HIV/AIDS (Hesketh et al., 2005). Because HIV/AIDS<br />

<strong>stigma</strong> also morally sta<strong>in</strong>s family members, family ties<br />

become threatened, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> relatives rout<strong>in</strong>ely discrim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st patients – nearly half <strong>of</strong> a Hong Kong<br />

patient sample reported at least a moderate level <strong>of</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

from relatives (Lau et al., 2003). A study <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Dai ethnic m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>in</strong> rural Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

revealed beliefs <strong>of</strong> family contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> bodies<br />

<strong>of</strong> drug abus<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>and</strong> frequently HIV-positive) family members<br />

were buried <strong>in</strong> separate graveyards so that <strong>the</strong>ir evil<br />

spirits would not <strong>in</strong>fect ancestors <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g (Deng, Li,<br />

Sr<strong>in</strong>gernyuang, & Zhang, 2007). Extreme discrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

towards relatives who rema<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ked to sufferers frequently<br />

occurs – e.g., (un<strong>in</strong>fected) children <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS patients<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g repeatedly refused school<strong>in</strong>g (J<strong>in</strong>g, 2006).<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r area where moral condemnation powerfully<br />

impacts people with HIV/AIDS is <strong>the</strong> healthcare system.<br />

Although <strong>in</strong>itially slow to respond, <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese government<br />

has s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>itiated free healthcare <strong>and</strong> prevention<br />

programs – such as <strong>the</strong> ‘‘Four Frees <strong>and</strong> One Care’’ policy –<br />

to curb <strong>the</strong> virus’ spread (He & Detels, 2005). Despite generally<br />

strong legislation that protects confidentiality <strong>and</strong><br />

guarantees access <strong>and</strong> equality <strong>of</strong> treatment, <strong>stigma</strong><br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ues to take place dur<strong>in</strong>g healthcare practice (Yang,<br />

Zhang, Chan, & Reidpath, 2005). That <strong>stigma</strong> occurs <strong>in</strong>terpersonally<br />

despite legislative protection illustrates how<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g rema<strong>in</strong>s key. For <strong>in</strong>stance, doctors<br />

<strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn Ch<strong>in</strong>a have contested treatment <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />

patients as ‘‘a waste <strong>of</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>e on a lowly (or morally<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated) <strong>in</strong>dividual’’ (J<strong>in</strong>g, 2006, p. 167). Similar<br />

views were endorsed by one health pr<strong>of</strong>essional sample<br />

<strong>in</strong> Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce – 30% were ‘‘unwill<strong>in</strong>g’’ <strong>and</strong> 81%<br />

‘‘preferred not’’ to treat HIV-positive patients (Hesketh<br />

et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong>se attitudes also contribute to differential<br />

treatment based on practices <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>of</strong>ten un<strong>in</strong>formed)<br />

HIV-test<strong>in</strong>g that results <strong>in</strong> deny<strong>in</strong>g treatment services for<br />

HIV-positive patients <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g hospitals (Yang et al., 2005).<br />

Fear <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> face has greatly discouraged <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

from seek<strong>in</strong>g HIV-test<strong>in</strong>g; hold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g beliefs<br />

have been associated with decreased likelihood <strong>of</strong> seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />

voluntary HIV-test<strong>in</strong>g (Liu et al., 2005). Effective HIV<br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011


treatment is fur<strong>the</strong>r delayed by <strong>in</strong>itial self-treatment<br />

through pharmacy visits, subsequent help-seek<strong>in</strong>g at private<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ics to protect privacy, f<strong>in</strong>ally lead<strong>in</strong>g to treatment<br />

at public hospitals or STD cl<strong>in</strong>ics despite <strong>the</strong>ir better quality<br />

<strong>and</strong> lower cost (Lieber, Li, Wu, Ro<strong>the</strong>ram-Borus, & Guan,<br />

2006). Consequently, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> estimated 840,000 HIV <strong>in</strong>fections<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, only 6% have been tested <strong>and</strong> recorded<br />

(Wu, Kem<strong>in</strong>g, & Cui, 2004). Ra<strong>the</strong>r than risk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tense<br />

community (<strong>and</strong> familial) rejection, <strong>the</strong> vast majority <strong>of</strong><br />

those <strong>in</strong>fected rema<strong>in</strong> unaware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir disease status,<br />

thus greatly foster<strong>in</strong>g medical noncompliance <strong>and</strong> transmission<br />

opportunities. Undetected cases constitute a grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

public health threat <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a as reported HIV <strong>in</strong>fections<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased from 30% <strong>in</strong> 2000 to 122% <strong>in</strong> 2003, <strong>and</strong> if left<br />

unchecked, could grow to 10 million by 2015 (Hesketh<br />

et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2004).<br />

A <strong>stigma</strong> model for Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Based on our conceptual analysis <strong>and</strong> review, we propose<br />

a three-layered model (see Fig. 1) to conceptualize<br />

Three Layers <strong>of</strong> Stigma <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Societal Factors Influenc<strong>in</strong>g Stigma<br />

a) Public Conceptions <strong>of</strong> Stigmatized<br />

Conditions<br />

b) Institutional Forms <strong>of</strong> Stigma<br />

-‘Field’ or Structures <strong>of</strong> Capital<br />

Change <strong>in</strong> Moral Aspects <strong>of</strong> Stigma<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> Face (or ‘Symbolic Capital’)<br />

how societal features <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> moral status<br />

result <strong>in</strong> adverse local outcomes <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

Societal factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>stigma</strong><br />

- Moral – Emotional (i.e., Emotional Reactions)<br />

- Moral – Somatic (i.e. Physical Manifestations)<br />

-<br />

-<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11 7<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> Subjective, Collective, <strong>and</strong> Interpersonal<br />

Aspects <strong>of</strong> Stigma<br />

a) Subjective/ Individual Aspects<br />

b) Collective Aspects<br />

Between Family Members<br />

Between Social Network Members<br />

c) Interpersonal Aspects<br />

- Physician Stigma<br />

- Family Member Status<br />

- Loss <strong>of</strong> Guanxi (or Access to ‘Social Capital’)<br />

Fig. 1. A <strong>stigma</strong> model for Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

<strong>The</strong> top layer <strong>of</strong> our model consists <strong>of</strong> societal-level factors.<br />

Like o<strong>the</strong>r models, we have identified public conceptions<br />

(i.e., cultural stereotypes, social hierarchies <strong>and</strong><br />

sociopolitical ideology – Corrigan & Watson, 2002) <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> (i.e., structural mechanisms<br />

that arise from economic, political <strong>and</strong> historical sources –<br />

Corrigan et al., 2004) as macrosocial factors that determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>stigma</strong>’s effects <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se structural forms, we<br />

highlight <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> ‘‘field’’, or structures <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

which Bourdieu (1986) def<strong>in</strong>es as, ‘‘.<strong>the</strong> unequal distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> capital’’ (i.e., economic, cultural, <strong>and</strong> social) <strong>and</strong>,<br />

‘‘.<strong>the</strong> power to impose <strong>the</strong> laws <strong>of</strong> function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

field most favorable to ‘current structures <strong>of</strong>’ capital <strong>and</strong><br />

its reproduction’’ (p. 246). From this perspective, how different<br />

capital is distributed at a given time represents <strong>the</strong><br />

configuration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social world, determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> specific<br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011


8<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> capital as well as <strong>the</strong> potential success <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

from social-exchange practices. Includ<strong>in</strong>g this construct<br />

highlights how <strong>stigma</strong> powerfully affects <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ capacities<br />

to mobilize social capital (i.e., network resources)<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> moral aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> second layer consists <strong>of</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> – specifically, los<strong>in</strong>g face or <strong>the</strong> ‘symbolic<br />

capital’ needed to access network resources. Although loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> face occurs simultaneously <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>separably from subjective<br />

<strong>and</strong> collective aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>, <strong>the</strong> position<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

moral components as <strong>in</strong>termediary emphasizes <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

central role <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>stigma</strong>. <strong>The</strong> potential mediat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

role <strong>of</strong> face is fur<strong>the</strong>r suggested by Mak et al. (2007), who<br />

report <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequacy <strong>of</strong> an attributional model alone <strong>in</strong><br />

expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g self-<strong>stigma</strong> among Hong Kong HIV-patients<br />

(Mak et al., 2007).<br />

Although loss <strong>of</strong> face exhibits features identifiable from<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>stigma</strong> conceptualizations (Jones et al., 1984) – e.g.,<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> responsibility (that AIDS patients engage<br />

<strong>in</strong> risky behaviors), peril (moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation can be<br />

transmitted), <strong>and</strong> concealability (face can be preserved if<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tized status rema<strong>in</strong>s unexposed), los<strong>in</strong>g face<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s phenomenologically dist<strong>in</strong>ct from any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

classifications. <strong>The</strong> precise mechanisms by which a <strong>stigma</strong>tized<br />

condition might lose face <strong>in</strong> a local sett<strong>in</strong>g (e.g.,<br />

through <strong>the</strong> above <strong>stigma</strong> dimensions or local mean<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

such as those attached with perceived ancestor misbehavior)<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> a critical area <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> subjective, collective, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong><br />

Because face constitutes a ‘total social phenomenon’<br />

(Mauss, 1967), our third layer comprises three separate but<br />

<strong>in</strong>terrelated levels consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>’s effects on actors<br />

<strong>in</strong> a social world. At <strong>the</strong> subjective (or <strong>in</strong>dividual) level, we<br />

propose that <strong>stigma</strong> is moral–emotional as values – or moral<br />

states – are l<strong>in</strong>ked to affect. Becom<strong>in</strong>g discredited with<strong>in</strong><br />

a moralistic system leads to discrete emotional conditions<br />

(e.g., humiliation) as loss <strong>of</strong> lian (or moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g) among<br />

community o<strong>the</strong>rs is powerfully felt as shame or humiliation.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, we assert that <strong>stigma</strong> is moral–somatic. Societal<br />

values are l<strong>in</strong>ked to one’s physiology as loss <strong>of</strong> face has<br />

somatopsychic expression. Such physical manifestations<br />

have been revealed as one’s face ‘crumbl<strong>in</strong>g away’ or as<br />

a way <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g ‘faceless’ (Kle<strong>in</strong>man & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 1993).<br />

At <strong>the</strong> collective level, we conceive that <strong>stigma</strong> occurs<br />

between family members <strong>and</strong> network associates. Loss <strong>of</strong><br />

lian spans collective experience, as <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g shame creates<br />

a ‘‘magnetic field <strong>of</strong> human emotion’’ felt by a group<br />

which also shapes <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual’s heart-m<strong>in</strong>d (x<strong>in</strong>; Sun,<br />

1987). For example, public disclosure <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s<br />

shame creates a collective subject among those shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that shame. This collective humiliation can be conceptualized<br />

as an <strong>in</strong>teractive process – with <strong>the</strong> words, gestures,<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>gs occurr<strong>in</strong>g between actors (or ‘<strong>in</strong>tersubjective<br />

space’ – Yang et al., 2007) as essential to <strong>stigma</strong><br />

as <strong>the</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> each actor.<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal level <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong>cludes all <strong>in</strong>dividualto-<strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g social<br />

distanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> rejection. Our analysis highlights physician<br />

<strong>and</strong> family member <strong>stigma</strong> as particularly salient <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

In addition, loss <strong>of</strong> guanxi or social capital – i.e., loss <strong>of</strong><br />

social opportunities to achieve desired social statuses<br />

such as marriage, <strong>and</strong> dim<strong>in</strong>ished access to material<br />

resources (via social-exchange networks) – also constitutes<br />

a crucial aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal <strong>stigma</strong>. Because loss <strong>of</strong> face<br />

compromises one’s moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a local community<br />

<strong>and</strong> access to social resources, <strong>stigma</strong> is fur<strong>the</strong>r seen to<br />

directly threaten <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal engagements that<br />

def<strong>in</strong>e what is most at stake for ord<strong>in</strong>ary Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>in</strong> everyday<br />

life (Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 1998).<br />

Anti-<strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a – ‘restor<strong>in</strong>g’ face<br />

With this formulation, we propose to combat <strong>stigma</strong> via<br />

<strong>the</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> face for <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> families. Ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than recommend<strong>in</strong>g macro-level strategies, we <strong>in</strong>stead<br />

focus <strong>in</strong>terventions on <strong>the</strong> local contexts related to moral<br />

status. We utilize previous empirical work regard<strong>in</strong>g anti<strong>stigma</strong><br />

strategies to <strong>in</strong>form such <strong>in</strong>terventions (Corrigan,<br />

2005; Thornicr<strong>of</strong>t, 2006; see pioneer<strong>in</strong>g work by Phillips<br />

& Gao, 1999); however, additional research is needed to tailor<br />

our recommendations to specific conditions <strong>and</strong> locales.<br />

To address <strong>the</strong> physical <strong>and</strong> emotional consequences<br />

caused by loss <strong>of</strong> moral status, we recommend what might<br />

be termed ‘‘remoralization’’ counsel<strong>in</strong>g that presumes that<br />

<strong>stigma</strong>tized <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> families have lost moral face<br />

(i.e., are ‘demoralized’) <strong>and</strong> consequently excluded from<br />

exchange networks (or face this danger). <strong>The</strong> first component<br />

<strong>of</strong> counsel<strong>in</strong>g seeks to counteract <strong>in</strong>ternalized <strong>stigma</strong><br />

(or ‘self-<strong>stigma</strong>’; Corrigan & Watson, 2002) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> emotional<br />

<strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> humiliation by replac<strong>in</strong>g notions <strong>of</strong><br />

moral depreciation (i.e., be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> ‘outcast’ or not ‘full’ adult<br />

status) with conceptions that even those with chronic<br />

illnesses are capable <strong>of</strong> uphold<strong>in</strong>g community obligations<br />

<strong>and</strong> contribut<strong>in</strong>g productively to society (Lau & Tsui,<br />

2005). Techniques from <strong>the</strong>rapies to modify cognitive schemata<br />

might productively facilitate such change (Corrigan,<br />

2005). To rebuild <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ abilities to partake <strong>in</strong> social<br />

exchange, a second component <strong>in</strong>volves ‘coach<strong>in</strong>g’ strategies<br />

to reach desired vocational <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal outcomes<br />

(e.g., employment, dat<strong>in</strong>g; Thornicr<strong>of</strong>t, 2006).<br />

Rebuild<strong>in</strong>g moral status, or possess<strong>in</strong>g a ‘‘trustworthy <strong>and</strong><br />

loyal’’ character, was regarded as important by >80% <strong>of</strong><br />

a sample <strong>of</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Hong Kong employers (Tsang<br />

et al., 2007). Such ‘‘remoralization coach<strong>in</strong>g’’ consists <strong>of</strong><br />

occupational support to rapidly locate <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> competitive<br />

employment <strong>and</strong> advice regard<strong>in</strong>g how to cope<br />

with common forms <strong>of</strong> job-related discrim<strong>in</strong>ation. Employment<br />

will provide <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>the</strong> capacity to reciprocate<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> to access social channels that are prerequisite<br />

to f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a spouse. Additionally, nuanced strategies <strong>of</strong><br />

‘selectively disclos<strong>in</strong>g’ (i.e., occurr<strong>in</strong>g on different levels by<br />

place, sett<strong>in</strong>g or behavior; Corrigan, 2005) a <strong>stigma</strong>tized<br />

status to employers, <strong>and</strong> potential romantic partners,<br />

constitutes a crucial element <strong>of</strong> this approach.<br />

We also recommend that <strong>the</strong>se ‘‘remoralization’’ strategies<br />

are implemented via multiple-family groups which<br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011


have been used to successfully treat schizophrenia <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

(Xiong et al., 1994). 6 <strong>The</strong> first goal is to legitimize <strong>the</strong> idea<br />

that powerful forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> occur among family<br />

members (Lau et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2005) <strong>and</strong> to exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />

possible <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g responses with<strong>in</strong> each family. Counteract<strong>in</strong>g<br />

perceived threats to relatives’ moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

due to associative or ‘‘courtesy’’ <strong>stigma</strong> (G<strong>of</strong>fman, 1963)<br />

acts to reduce discrim<strong>in</strong>atory attitudes towards <strong>the</strong> patient<br />

as well as <strong>the</strong> family’s ‘collective shame’. Mobiliz<strong>in</strong>g family<br />

cooperation facilitates patient recovery, as relatives aid <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> disclosure process, daily activities, f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>and</strong> medical<br />

assistance, <strong>and</strong> psychological support (Li et al., 2006).<br />

After re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>trafamilial solidarity, treatment <strong>the</strong>n<br />

might shift to legitimiz<strong>in</strong>g extrafamilial discrim<strong>in</strong>ation felt<br />

by families (Lee et al., 2005), which is reframed as a form <strong>of</strong><br />

unjust treatment (Wu, 2005). Along with a cl<strong>in</strong>ician, a suitably<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed family member ‘consultant’ (Phillips & Gao,<br />

1999) could co-lead each multiple-family group, <strong>and</strong> role<br />

model successful adaptation to <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g circumstance.<br />

Shar<strong>in</strong>g between families <strong>of</strong> cop<strong>in</strong>g experiences is<br />

viewed as a mobilization or empowerment strategy (Corrigan,<br />

2005), whereby shameful feel<strong>in</strong>gs are transformed<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>creased self-worth <strong>and</strong> enhanced moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Communicat<strong>in</strong>g feel<strong>in</strong>gs between families also produces<br />

embodied ganq<strong>in</strong>g, or human emotion, which reconstitutes<br />

a complementary guanxi web to share favors <strong>and</strong> exchange<br />

resources with (Kipnis, 1997) before reentry is renegotiated<br />

<strong>in</strong>to one’s primary guanxi network. <strong>The</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tra<br />

<strong>and</strong> extra-familial <strong>stigma</strong>, mobilization <strong>of</strong> family commitments,<br />

<strong>and</strong> rebuild<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> guanxi networks results <strong>in</strong> raised<br />

moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, trust, <strong>and</strong> reciprocity among <strong>in</strong>dividuals –<br />

constructs l<strong>in</strong>ked with facilitat<strong>in</strong>g social networks <strong>and</strong> positive<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> health among rural Ch<strong>in</strong>ese (Yip et al.,<br />

2007).<br />

To counter physician <strong>stigma</strong>, we propose state <strong>and</strong> local<br />

government-sponsored dialogues between people with<br />

<strong>stigma</strong>tized conditions <strong>and</strong> healthcare pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to<br />

change disempower<strong>in</strong>g attitudes entrenched <strong>in</strong> healthcare<br />

(Corrigan, 2005; Phillips & Gao, 1999). <strong>The</strong>se formal, faceto-face<br />

dialogues would provide a non-confrontational<br />

forum to discuss how physician actions contribute to <strong>the</strong><br />

loss <strong>of</strong> patients’ <strong>and</strong> family members’ moral status (e.g.,<br />

<strong>in</strong>fantilization perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to schizophrenia). <strong>The</strong>se discourses<br />

should target current providers <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular<br />

medical students to counteract <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g attitudes<br />

while not fully formed (Thornicr<strong>of</strong>t, 2006). To maximize<br />

efficacy <strong>of</strong> this contact-based <strong>in</strong>tervention (which has <strong>the</strong><br />

most empirical support <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>stigma</strong>), <strong>stigma</strong>tized<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals who moderately disconfirm group stereotypes<br />

should be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> ongo<strong>in</strong>g dialogues that exhibit (1)<br />

equal status between groups; (2) common goals; (3) cooperative<br />

efforts; <strong>and</strong> (4) authorized sanction (Corrigan,<br />

2005). Although substantial cultural barriers (i.e., low government<br />

priority towards <strong>stigma</strong>tized <strong>in</strong>dividuals; also, few<br />

6 To treat <strong>in</strong>dividuals ab<strong>and</strong>oned due to <strong>stigma</strong>, we recommend establish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

government-funded shelters for such persons to receive psychological<br />

<strong>and</strong> medication counsel<strong>in</strong>g, vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, peer support,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to share <strong>in</strong> a ‘‘family concept’’. Reconciliation with families can be attempted<br />

after 3–6 months after patient stabilization (such as among AIDS<br />

patients <strong>in</strong> Malaysia; Edwards, 2007).<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11 9<br />

AIDS <strong>and</strong> schizophrenia advocacy groups exist; J<strong>in</strong>g, 2006;<br />

Phillips & Gao, 1999) work aga<strong>in</strong>st implement<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

approach, <strong>in</strong>itial trials might be developed as experimental<br />

<strong>in</strong>terventions at research-affiliated hospitals <strong>and</strong> subsequently<br />

dissem<strong>in</strong>ated more broadly.<br />

Face applied to a cross-cultural underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>stigma</strong><br />

Revealed through our analysis <strong>of</strong> face <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> unacknowledged<br />

by previous <strong>stigma</strong> models, we propose<br />

a cross-cultural formulation that <strong>stigma</strong> also deeply reflects<br />

a fundamentally moral process <strong>in</strong> which <strong>stigma</strong>tized conditions<br />

threaten what is most at stake for sufferers. Los<strong>in</strong>g<br />

face, by represent<strong>in</strong>g a person’s loss <strong>of</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g,<br />

illustrates how <strong>stigma</strong> is embedded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral life <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals. <strong>The</strong> uphold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> face to achieve<br />

opportunities for <strong>in</strong>dividuals to marry, have children, <strong>and</strong><br />

perpetuate <strong>the</strong> family structure constitute core lived values<br />

around which many social groups <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a revolve. Uphold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

face thus exemplifies a ‘‘moral mode’’ <strong>of</strong> experience, or<br />

moral experience, which refers to that register <strong>of</strong> everyday<br />

life <strong>and</strong> practical engagement that def<strong>in</strong>es what matters<br />

most for ord<strong>in</strong>ary people <strong>in</strong> a local world, such as status,<br />

money, life chances, health, or relationships (Kle<strong>in</strong>man,<br />

1998). We conceive <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> as a fundamentally moral<br />

issue – that <strong>stigma</strong>tized conditions threaten what deeply<br />

matters for those <strong>in</strong> a local world who are engaged <strong>in</strong> a process<br />

<strong>of</strong> gripp<strong>in</strong>g life <strong>and</strong> preserv<strong>in</strong>g what matters. Put differently,<br />

while <strong>stigma</strong> affects many life doma<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>stigma</strong>’s<br />

lived experience is felt to coalesce around those engagements<br />

or life doma<strong>in</strong>s that are felt to matter most to<br />

sufferers, responders, <strong>and</strong> observers. In Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tized<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d what is held as most dear – moral face – to be<br />

seriously menaced. This threat is also felt by <strong>stigma</strong>tizers,<br />

who respond us<strong>in</strong>g discrim<strong>in</strong>ation as pragmatic responses<br />

to what <strong>the</strong>y underst<strong>and</strong> to be real danger to preserv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir face. In Ch<strong>in</strong>a, what matters most is uphold<strong>in</strong>g face,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> core lived values that def<strong>in</strong>e dist<strong>in</strong>ct moral worlds<br />

<strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sett<strong>in</strong>gs will be locally constituted (e.g., <strong>in</strong> local<br />

U.S. contexts, <strong>the</strong>se might be <strong>the</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

freedoms; Yang et al., 2007). <strong>The</strong> focus on moral experience<br />

reconceptualizes how <strong>the</strong> social world shapes <strong>stigma</strong> by<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g a more adequate underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> behaviors<br />

<strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tized <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tizers, for it allows<br />

us to see both as <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g, liv<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> react<strong>in</strong>g to what<br />

is most at stake <strong>and</strong> what is most threatened.<br />

Our analysis also highlights <strong>stigma</strong>’s impact on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual’s<br />

ability to mobilize sources <strong>of</strong> social capital. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than Kurzban <strong>and</strong> Leary (2001) who emphasize poor capacity<br />

for social exchange as a reason for <strong>stigma</strong>tization, <strong>the</strong><br />

l<strong>in</strong>ks between <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> social capital rema<strong>in</strong> largely<br />

unarticulated. <strong>The</strong> ‘social support’ conceptualization <strong>of</strong><br />

social capital <strong>and</strong> health – whereby one’s ability to draw<br />

upon resources through connections is central to objective<br />

<strong>and</strong> subjective welfare (Kawachi, Kim, Coutts, & Subramanian,<br />

2004) – appears most relevant to <strong>stigma</strong>. <strong>The</strong> literature<br />

l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g perception <strong>of</strong> low SES with prolonged states<br />

<strong>of</strong> anxiety <strong>and</strong> arousal, ultimately result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> long-term<br />

health problems, might fruitfully be applied to <strong>stigma</strong> (Wilk<strong>in</strong>son,<br />

1996). Because loss <strong>of</strong> social capital appears to be<br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011


10<br />

a significant determ<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>of</strong> healthcare access, mental<br />

health, mortality, <strong>and</strong> health status (Szreter & Woolcock,<br />

2004), this construct also suggests an important pathway<br />

to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>’s effects. For example, <strong>stigma</strong> might affect<br />

mental health by endanger<strong>in</strong>g access to both ‘structural’<br />

(i.e., <strong>in</strong>stitutions that provide treatment services) <strong>and</strong> ‘cognitive’<br />

(i.e., trust that <strong>in</strong>creases feel<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> security) aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> social capital (Harpham et al., 2002). Future studies<br />

might also specify how <strong>stigma</strong> threatens entitlement to<br />

specific material or <strong>in</strong>formational resources <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> ability<br />

to ga<strong>in</strong> from <strong>the</strong>m, capabilities which are commonly mediated<br />

through one’s social connections. Although <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong><br />

guanxi provides an especially vivid example, we propose<br />

that our analysis <strong>of</strong> how <strong>stigma</strong> adversely affects mobilization<br />

<strong>of</strong> social capital <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a may extend to o<strong>the</strong>r cultures,<br />

particularly when network- <strong>and</strong> connection-based exchanges<br />

occur more frequently as opposed to where capitalist<br />

<strong>and</strong> marketplace transactions predom<strong>in</strong>ate.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Our central concern is that <strong>stigma</strong> be reconceived as<br />

a moral process. Through our analysis <strong>of</strong> face <strong>and</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>,<br />

we propose that moral status, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects that <strong>stigma</strong><br />

has on limit<strong>in</strong>g social capital, be viewed as crucial to empirical<br />

research aimed at better underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sources<br />

<strong>and</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, we propose that<br />

efforts at de<strong>stigma</strong>tization be developed to improve moral<br />

status so that evaluation studies can determ<strong>in</strong>e if this<br />

<strong>stigma</strong> approach can benefit policy <strong>and</strong> programs both<br />

with<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r cross-cultural sett<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

<strong>The</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> this manuscript was supported, <strong>in</strong><br />

part, by National Institute <strong>of</strong> Mental Health grant K01<br />

MH734034-01, which has been awarded to <strong>the</strong> first author.<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors thank research assistant Kathleen Janel Sia for<br />

her aid with <strong>the</strong> literature review <strong>and</strong> formatt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

manuscript.<br />

References<br />

Bourdieu, P. (1986). <strong>The</strong> forms <strong>of</strong> capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), <strong>The</strong><br />

h<strong>and</strong>book <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>and</strong> research for <strong>the</strong> sociology <strong>of</strong> education (pp.<br />

241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, Inc.<br />

Corrigan, P. W. (2005). On <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>of</strong> mental illness: Practical strategies<br />

for research <strong>and</strong> social change. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, D.C.: American Psychological<br />

Association.<br />

Corrigan, P. W., Markowitz, F. E., & Watson, A. C. (2004). Structural levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> mental illness <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation. Schizophrenia Bullet<strong>in</strong>,<br />

30(3), 481–491.<br />

Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). <strong>The</strong> paradox <strong>of</strong> self-<strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

mental illness. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Psychology: Science <strong>and</strong> Practice, 9(1), 35–53.<br />

Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social <strong>stigma</strong>. In S. Fiske,<br />

D. Gilbert, & G. L<strong>in</strong>dzey (Eds.), H<strong>and</strong>book <strong>of</strong> social psychology (pp.<br />

504–553). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.<br />

Deng, R., Li, J., Sr<strong>in</strong>gernyuang, L., & Zhang, K. (2007). Drug abuse, HIV/AIDS<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tization <strong>in</strong> a Dai community <strong>in</strong> Yunnan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Social<br />

Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 64, 1560–1571.<br />

Edwards, A. (2007). Driven by an unselfish love. <strong>The</strong> Star Onl<strong>in</strong>e. Focus.<br />

Fei, X. (1992). From <strong>the</strong> soil: <strong>The</strong> foundations <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese society. Berkeley,<br />

CA: University <strong>of</strong> California Press.<br />

Furnham, A., & Chan, E. (2004). Lay <strong>the</strong>ories <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia: a crosscultural<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> British <strong>and</strong> Hong Kong Ch<strong>in</strong>ese attitudes,<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />

attributions <strong>and</strong> beliefs. Social Psychiatry <strong>and</strong> Psychiatric Epidemiology,<br />

39, 543–552.<br />

G<strong>of</strong>fman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> spoiled identity.<br />

New York: Prentice Hall.<br />

Harpham, T., Grant, E., & Thomas, E. (2002). Measur<strong>in</strong>g social capital<br />

with<strong>in</strong> health surveys: key issues. Health Policy <strong>and</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g, 17(1),<br />

106–111.<br />

He, N., & Detels, R. (2005). <strong>The</strong> HIV epidemic <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: history, response,<br />

<strong>and</strong> challenge. Cell Research, 15(11–12), 825–832.<br />

Hesketh, T., Duo, L., Li, H., & Tomk<strong>in</strong>s, A. M. (2005). Attitudes to HIV <strong>and</strong><br />

HIV test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> high-prevalence areas <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> voluntary counsel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g programmes. Sexually<br />

Transmitted Infections, 81, 108–112.<br />

Hu, H. C. (1944). <strong>The</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese concept <strong>of</strong> ‘‘face’’. American Anthropologist,<br />

46(1), 45–64.<br />

Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face <strong>and</strong> favor: <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese power game. American<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Sociology, 92, 944–974.<br />

Jacobs, B. (1979). A prelim<strong>in</strong>ary model <strong>of</strong> particularistic ties <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

political alliances: Kan-ch’<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Kuan-hsi <strong>in</strong> a rural Taiwanese<br />

township. Ch<strong>in</strong>a Quarterly, 78, 237–273.<br />

J<strong>in</strong>g, J. (2006). Fear <strong>and</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>: an exploratory study <strong>of</strong> AIDS patient<br />

narratives <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. In J. Kaufman, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man, & T. Saich (Eds.),<br />

AIDS <strong>and</strong> social policy <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a (pp. 152–169). Cambridge, MA: Harvard<br />

University Press.<br />

Jones, E. E., Far<strong>in</strong>a, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., & Scott, R. A.<br />

(1984). Social <strong>stigma</strong>: <strong>The</strong> psychology <strong>of</strong> marked relationships. New<br />

York: Freeman.<br />

Kawachi, I., Kim, D., Coutts, A., & Subramanian, S. V. (2004). Commentary:<br />

reconcil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> three accounts <strong>of</strong> social capital. International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Epidemiology, 33, 682–690.<br />

K<strong>in</strong>g, A. Y. C. (1994). Kuan-hsi <strong>and</strong> network build<strong>in</strong>g: a sociological <strong>in</strong>terpretation.<br />

In W. M. Tu (Ed.), <strong>The</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g tree: <strong>The</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese today (pp. 109–126). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.<br />

Kipnis, A. B. (1997). Produc<strong>in</strong>g guanxi: Sentiment, self, <strong>and</strong> subculture <strong>in</strong><br />

a North Ch<strong>in</strong>a village. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.<br />

Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A. (1998). Experience <strong>and</strong> its moral modes: culture, human conditions,<br />

<strong>and</strong> disorder. In G. B. Peterson (Ed.), <strong>The</strong> Tanner lectures on human<br />

values (pp. 357–420). Salt Lake City: University <strong>of</strong> Utah Press.<br />

Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, J. (1991). Suffer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> its pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

transformation: toward an ethnography <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal experience.<br />

Culture, Medic<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> Psychiatry, 15(3), 275–301.<br />

Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A. M., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, J. (1993). Face, favor <strong>and</strong> families: <strong>the</strong> social<br />

course <strong>of</strong> mental health problems <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>and</strong> American societies.<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Journal <strong>of</strong> Mental Health, 6, 37–47.<br />

Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary orig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tization:<br />

<strong>the</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> social exclusion. Psychological Bullet<strong>in</strong>, 127(2),<br />

187–208.<br />

Lau, D. C. (1984). Mencius. Hong Kong: Ch<strong>in</strong>ese University Press.<br />

Lau, J. T. F., & Tsui, H. Y. (2005). Discrim<strong>in</strong>atory attitudes towards people<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g with HIV/AIDS <strong>and</strong> associated factors: a population-based<br />

study <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese general population. Sexually Transmitted Infections,<br />

81, 113–119.<br />

Lau, J. T. F., Tsui, H. Y., Li, C. K., Chung, W. Y., Chan, M. W., & Molassiotis, A.<br />

(2003). Needs assessment <strong>and</strong> social environment <strong>of</strong> people liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with HIV/AIDS <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong. AIDS Care, 15(5), 699–706.<br />

Lee, S. L., Chiu, M. Y. L., Tsang, A., Chui, H., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A. (2006). Stigmatiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

experience <strong>and</strong> structural discrim<strong>in</strong>ation associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong. Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

62, 1685–1696.<br />

Lee, S., Lee, M. T. Y., Chiu, M. Y. L., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A. (2005). Experience <strong>of</strong><br />

social <strong>stigma</strong> by people with schizophrenia <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong. British Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, 186, 153–157.<br />

Li, L., Wu, S., Wu, Z., Sun, S., Cui, H., & Jia, M. (2006). Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g family<br />

support for people liv<strong>in</strong>g with HIV/AIDS <strong>in</strong> Yunnan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. AIDS <strong>and</strong><br />

Behavior, 10(5), 509–517.<br />

Lieber, E., Li, L., Wu, Z., Ro<strong>the</strong>ram-Borus, M. J., & Guan, J. (2006). HIV/STD<br />

<strong>stigma</strong>tization fears as health seek<strong>in</strong>g barriers <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. AIDS <strong>and</strong><br />

Behavior, 10(5), 463–471.<br />

Lieber, E., Nihira, K., & M<strong>in</strong>k, I. T. (2004). Filial piety, modernization, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> challenges <strong>of</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g children for Ch<strong>in</strong>ese immigrants: quantitative<br />

<strong>and</strong> qualitative evidence. Ethos, 32(3), 324–347.<br />

L<strong>in</strong>k, B. G., Cullen, F. T., Struen<strong>in</strong>g, E. L., Shrout, P. E., & Dohrenwend, B. P.<br />

(1989). A modified label<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ory approach <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> mental<br />

disorders: an empirical assessment. American Sociological Review,<br />

54, 100–123.<br />

Liu, H., Li, X., Stanton, B., Fang, X., Mao, R., & Chen, X., et al. (2005). Relation<br />

<strong>of</strong> sexual risks <strong>and</strong> prevention practices with <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

beliefs towards HIV <strong>in</strong>fected <strong>in</strong>dividuals: an exploratory study.<br />

Sexually Transmitted Infections, 81, 511–516.<br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011


Mak, W. S., Mo, P. K. H., Cheung, R. Y. M., Woo, J., Cheung, F. M., & Lee, D.<br />

(2006). Comparative <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS, SARS, <strong>and</strong> tuberculosis <strong>in</strong><br />

Hong Kong. Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 63, 1912–1922.<br />

Mak, W. W. S., Cheung, R. Y. M., Law, R. W., Woo, J., Li, P. C. K., & Chung, R.<br />

W. Y. (2007). Exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g attribution model <strong>of</strong> self-<strong>stigma</strong> on social<br />

support <strong>and</strong> psychological well-be<strong>in</strong>g among people with HIVþ/<br />

AIDS. Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 64, 1549–1559.<br />

Marsella, A. J., & Choi, S. C. (1993). Psychosocial aspects <strong>of</strong> modernization <strong>and</strong><br />

economic development <strong>in</strong> East Asian nations. Psychologia, 36, 201–213.<br />

Mauss, M. (1967). <strong>The</strong> gift. New York: W.W. Norton.<br />

Parker, P., & Aggleton, P. (2003). HIV <strong>and</strong> AIDS-related <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

discrim<strong>in</strong>ation: a conceptual framework <strong>and</strong> implications for action.<br />

Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 57, 13–24.<br />

Pearson, V. (1995). Mental health care <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: State policies, pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

services <strong>and</strong> family responsibilities. London: Gaskell.<br />

Phillips, M. R. (1993). Strategies used by Ch<strong>in</strong>ese families cop<strong>in</strong>g with schizophrenia.<br />

In D. Davis, & S. Harrell (Eds.), Ch<strong>in</strong>ese families <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-Mao era<br />

(pp. 277–306). Los Angeles, CA: University <strong>of</strong> California Press.<br />

Phillips, M. R., & Gao, S. (1999). Report on <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

mentally ill <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir family members <strong>in</strong> urban Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Report to <strong>the</strong><br />

World Health Organization.<br />

Phillips, M. R., Pearson, V., Li, F., Xu, M., & Yang, L. H. (2002). Stigma <strong>and</strong><br />

expressed emotion: a study <strong>of</strong> people with schizophrenia <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

family members <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. British Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, 181, 488–<br />

493.<br />

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Mak<strong>in</strong>g democracy work: Civic traditions <strong>in</strong> modern<br />

Italy. Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton, NJ: Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton University Press.<br />

Sevigny, R., Weny<strong>in</strong>g, Y., Peiyan, Z., Marleau, J. D., Zhouyun, Y., & L<strong>in</strong>, S., et<br />

al. (1999). Attitudes toward <strong>the</strong> mentally ill <strong>in</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a psychiatric hospital <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g (Ch<strong>in</strong>a). International<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Psychiatry, 45(1), 41–55.<br />

Shan, H. (April 18, 2007). Breakthrough hoped for with new mental<br />

health law. Available from: Ch<strong>in</strong>a.org.cn.<br />

Stafford, C. (1995). <strong>The</strong> roads <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese childhood: Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> identification<br />

<strong>in</strong> Angang. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Sun, L. K. (1987). Zhongguo Wenhuade Shenceng Jiegou. [<strong>The</strong> deep structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese culture]. Hong Kong: Ji Xian She.<br />

Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital,<br />

social <strong>the</strong>ory, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> political economy <strong>of</strong> public health. International<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology, 33, 1–18.<br />

Thornicr<strong>of</strong>t, G. (2006). Shunned: Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation aga<strong>in</strong>st people with mental<br />

illness. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Tsang, H. W. H., Angell, B., Corrigan, P. W., Lee, Y. T., Shi, K., & Lam, C. S., et<br />

al. (2007). A cross-cultural study <strong>of</strong> employers’ concerns about hir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

people with psychotic disorder: implications for recovery. Social<br />

Psychiatry <strong>and</strong> Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42, 723–733.<br />

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11 11<br />

Tu, W. M. (1987). Confucian humanism <strong>in</strong> a modern perspective. In J. P. L.<br />

Jiang (Ed.), Confucianism <strong>and</strong> modernization: A symposium. Taipei:<br />

Freedom Council.<br />

Walder, A. (1986). Communist Neo-traditionalism: Work <strong>and</strong> authority <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>in</strong>dustry. Berkeley: University <strong>of</strong> California Press.<br />

Wilk<strong>in</strong>son, R. (1996). Unhealthy societies: <strong>The</strong> afflictions <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>equality. London:<br />

Routledge.<br />

Wu, F. (2005). Elegy for luck: Suicide <strong>in</strong> a county <strong>of</strong> North Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Unpublished<br />

dissertation, Harvard University.<br />

Wu, Z., Kem<strong>in</strong>g, R., & Cui, H. (2004). <strong>The</strong> HIV/AIDS epidemic <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a:<br />

history, current strategies <strong>and</strong> future challenges. AIDS Education <strong>and</strong><br />

Prevention, 16, 7–17.<br />

Xiong, W., Phillips, M. R., Hu, X., Wang, R., Dai, Q., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, J., et al.<br />

(1994). Family-based <strong>in</strong>tervention for schizophrenic patients <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a: a r<strong>and</strong>omised controlled trial. British Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry,<br />

165, 239–247.<br />

Yan, Y. (1996). <strong>The</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> gifts: Reciprocity <strong>and</strong> social networks <strong>in</strong> a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

village. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.<br />

Yan, Y. (2003). Private life under socialism: Love, <strong>in</strong>timacy, <strong>and</strong> family<br />

change <strong>in</strong> a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese village (1949–1999). Stanford, CA: Stanford University<br />

Press.<br />

Yang, K. S. (1998). Ch<strong>in</strong>ese responses to modernization: a psychological<br />

analysis. Asian Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Psychology, 1, 75–97.<br />

Yang, L. H. (2003). Causal attributions, expressed emotion, <strong>and</strong> patient<br />

relapse: recent f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> application to Ch<strong>in</strong>ese societies. Hong<br />

Kong Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, 13(2), 16–25.<br />

Yang, L. H. (2007). Application <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory to Ch<strong>in</strong>ese groups with<br />

mental illness: syn<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>and</strong> new directions. S<strong>in</strong>gapore Medical Journal,<br />

48(11), 977–985.<br />

Yang, L. H., Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A., L<strong>in</strong>k, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Lee, S., & Good, B. (2007).<br />

Culture <strong>and</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>: add<strong>in</strong>g moral experience to <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory. Social<br />

Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 64(7), 1524–1535.<br />

Yang, L. S. (1957). <strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> ‘Pao’ as a basis for social relations <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a. In J. K. Fairbank (Ed.), Ch<strong>in</strong>ese thought <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions (pp.<br />

291–309). Chicago: University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press.<br />

Yang, M. M. H. (1994). Gifts, favors <strong>and</strong> banquets: <strong>The</strong> art <strong>of</strong> social relationships<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.<br />

Yang, Y., Zhang, K. L., Chan, K. Y., & Reidpath, D. D. (2005). Institutional<br />

<strong>and</strong> structural forms <strong>of</strong> HIV-related discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> health care:<br />

a study set <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g. AIDS Care, 17(Suppl. 2), S129–S140.<br />

Yip, W., Subramanian, S. V., Mitchell, A. D., Lee, D. S., Wang, J., &<br />

Kawachi, I. (2007). Does social capital enhance health <strong>and</strong> well-be<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

Evidence from rural Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 64(1),<br />

35–49.<br />

Zito, A. (1987). City gods, filiality <strong>and</strong> hegemony <strong>in</strong> late imperial Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

Modern Ch<strong>in</strong>a, 13(3), 333–371.<br />

Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!