'Face' and the embodiment of stigma in China - The Department of ...
'Face' and the embodiment of stigma in China - The Department of ...
'Face' and the embodiment of stigma in China - The Department of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases<br />
<strong>of</strong> schizophrenia <strong>and</strong> AIDS<br />
Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang a, *, Arthur Kle<strong>in</strong>man b<br />
a <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, Room 1610, New York, NY 10032, United States<br />
b <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Anthropology, Harvard University, William James Hall, Room 330, 33 Kirkl<strong>and</strong> Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States<br />
Keywords:<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
AIDS<br />
Face<br />
Mental illness<br />
Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
Social capital<br />
Culture<br />
Stigma<br />
Introduction<br />
abstract<br />
Current <strong>the</strong>oretical models have greatly advanced our<br />
underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> how <strong>stigma</strong> affects people via a broad<br />
array <strong>of</strong> psychological processes <strong>and</strong> social mechanisms.<br />
Although <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>ories have generated much research by<br />
highlight<strong>in</strong>g different routes by which <strong>stigma</strong> acts upon<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual, <strong>the</strong> great majority limits <strong>the</strong> negative effects<br />
* Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author. Tel.: þ1 212 305-4747; fax: þ1 212 342 5169.<br />
E-mail addresses: lhy2001@columbia.edu (L.H. Yang), kle<strong>in</strong>man@<br />
wjh.harvard.edu (A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man).<br />
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect<br />
Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/socscimed<br />
0277-9536/$ – see front matter Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br />
doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />
<strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical models have def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>stigma</strong> as occurr<strong>in</strong>g psychologically <strong>and</strong><br />
limit its negative effects to <strong>in</strong>dividual processes. This paper, via an analysis <strong>of</strong> how ‘face’<br />
is embodied <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, deepens an articulation <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> social aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> might<br />
<strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>the</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> both <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>and</strong> collective actors def<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong><br />
a local context. We illustrate (1) how one’s moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g is lodged with<strong>in</strong> a local social<br />
world; (2) how one’s status as a ‘moral’ community member is cont<strong>in</strong>gent upon uphold<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>trapersonal <strong>and</strong> social-transactional obligations; <strong>and</strong> (3) how loss <strong>of</strong> face <strong>and</strong> fears <strong>of</strong><br />
moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation might lead to a ‘social death’. We first draw from Ch<strong>in</strong>ese ethnographies<br />
that describe <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> human cultivation before one can achieve fully ‘moral’<br />
status <strong>in</strong> society. We <strong>in</strong>tegrate f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from empirical studies describ<strong>in</strong>g how social-exchange<br />
networks <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a are strictly organized based on <strong>the</strong> reciprocation <strong>of</strong> favors, moral<br />
position<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> ‘face’. We fur<strong>the</strong>r ground <strong>the</strong>se Ch<strong>in</strong>ese constructs with<strong>in</strong> a <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />
framework <strong>of</strong> different forms <strong>of</strong> capital, <strong>and</strong> discuss <strong>the</strong> severe social consequences that<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> face entails. By utiliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> examples <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia <strong>and</strong> AIDS to illustrate<br />
how loss <strong>of</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> is <strong>in</strong>terwoven <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, we propose a model highlight<strong>in</strong>g<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> moral status to describe how <strong>stigma</strong> operates. We suggest that symbolic<br />
restoration <strong>of</strong> moral status for <strong>stigma</strong>tized groups takes place as local-level <strong>stigma</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>terventions. By analyz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> moral aspects <strong>of</strong> ‘face’, we propose that across cultures,<br />
<strong>stigma</strong> is embedded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral experience <strong>of</strong> participants, whereby <strong>stigma</strong> is conceived<br />
as a fundamentally moral issue: <strong>stigma</strong>tized conditions threaten what matters most for<br />
those <strong>in</strong> a local world. We fur<strong>the</strong>r propose that <strong>stigma</strong> jeopardizes an actor’s ability to mobilize<br />
social capital to atta<strong>in</strong> essential social statuses.<br />
Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> to self-processes. Consequently, <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
psychological processes are predom<strong>in</strong>antly seen to mediate<br />
<strong>stigma</strong>’s effects, <strong>and</strong> negative outcomes result from how an<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual copes with <strong>and</strong> responds to <strong>stigma</strong> (Parker &<br />
Aggleton, 2003).<br />
Conceptual models have described <strong>stigma</strong>’s social<br />
elements <strong>in</strong> manifold ways which we outl<strong>in</strong>e briefly (for<br />
a full analysis, see Yang et al., 2007). Social psychological<br />
models primarily deal with <strong>the</strong>se aspects as a ‘social identity’<br />
applied to an <strong>in</strong>dividual, situational stimulus that <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
respond to, or as cultural stereotypes (Crocker,<br />
Major, & Steele, 1998). Sociological models describe <strong>the</strong><br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011
2<br />
social doma<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> as occurr<strong>in</strong>g when objects <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
social world obta<strong>in</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g through symbolic <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
(G<strong>of</strong>fman, 1963; L<strong>in</strong>k, Cullen, Struen<strong>in</strong>g, Shrout, & Dohrenwend,<br />
1989), while o<strong>the</strong>r authors express <strong>the</strong>se social<br />
dimensions as occurr<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>in</strong>stitutional, structural,<br />
<strong>and</strong> hegemonic forms (Corrigan, Markowitz, & Watson,<br />
2004; Parker & Aggleton, 2003).<br />
While acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> key roles that psychological<br />
<strong>and</strong> macrosocial forces play <strong>in</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>’s manifestation, currently<br />
miss<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> literature is a deepened articulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> social aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> might<br />
<strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>the</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> both <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>and</strong><br />
collective actors as def<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> a local context. This<br />
paper seeks to more deeply illum<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>stigma</strong>’s social<br />
elements through exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g how <strong>the</strong> cultural phenomenon<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‘face’, by represent<strong>in</strong>g a person’s moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> community, leads to <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a. We seek to reveal through an <strong>in</strong>-depth analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
‘face’: (1) how one’s moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g is lodged with<strong>in</strong> a local<br />
social world; (2) how one’s status as a ‘moral’ community<br />
member is cont<strong>in</strong>gent upon uphold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>trapersonal <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>terpersonal (social-transactional) obligations <strong>and</strong>; (3)<br />
how loss <strong>of</strong> face <strong>and</strong> accompany<strong>in</strong>g fears <strong>of</strong> moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
might lead to a ‘social death’. We fur<strong>the</strong>r exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />
how ‘face’ <strong>and</strong> moral status <strong>in</strong>teract with <strong>stigma</strong> by exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
schizophrenia <strong>and</strong> AIDS <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Through our analysis,<br />
we present a conceptual model describ<strong>in</strong>g how changes<br />
<strong>in</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g lead to negative outcomes <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>and</strong><br />
provide culture-specific recommendations for combat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>stigma</strong> by restor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> moral status <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong><br />
families at <strong>the</strong> local level. We conclude by propos<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
<strong>the</strong> face dynamic reveals novel ways <strong>of</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>stigma</strong>’s<br />
underly<strong>in</strong>g nature across culturesdthat <strong>stigma</strong> at its<br />
essence is a moral process (i.e., threatens what matters<br />
most for those <strong>in</strong> a local world) <strong>and</strong> that <strong>stigma</strong> jeopardizes<br />
an actor’s ability to mobilize network resources (or ‘social<br />
capital’) to atta<strong>in</strong> essential social statuses.<br />
‘Face’ as a physical, emotional, social <strong>and</strong> moral<br />
process <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese society<br />
We utilize conceptual writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> empirical studies on<br />
‘face’ <strong>and</strong> social exchange to advance underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>stigma</strong> formation <strong>in</strong> local Ch<strong>in</strong>ese communities. We first<br />
draw from Ch<strong>in</strong>ese texts <strong>and</strong> ethnographies that describe<br />
<strong>the</strong> requisite process <strong>of</strong> human ‘cultivation’ before one<br />
can achieve status as a fully ‘moral’ person (Lau, 1984; Stafford,<br />
1995). We <strong>the</strong>n <strong>in</strong>tegrate f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from ethnographies<br />
<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r empirical studies that describe how socialexchange<br />
networks <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a are strictly organized based<br />
on <strong>the</strong> reciprocation <strong>of</strong> favors, moral position<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong><br />
‘face’ (Fei, 1992; Kipnis,1997; Yan, 1996). We fur<strong>the</strong>r ground<br />
<strong>the</strong>se Ch<strong>in</strong>ese constructs with<strong>in</strong> a <strong>the</strong>oretical framework <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> capital articulated by Bourdieu<br />
(1986), particularly that <strong>of</strong> social capital (Szreter & Woolcock,<br />
2004). We conclude this section by discuss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
severe social consequences that loss <strong>of</strong> face entails for <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
<strong>and</strong> networks.<br />
For purposes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory-build<strong>in</strong>g, we depict an ideal case<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> ‘moral persons’ <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. However, this<br />
social dynamic <strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> ‘face’ are currently be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />
contested <strong>and</strong> reconstructed. <strong>The</strong> transition to a market<br />
economy – <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an emergent private sector, new<br />
foreign <strong>in</strong>vestment, <strong>and</strong> imported cultural media (films,<br />
music) – has greatly reshaped traditional Ch<strong>in</strong>ese society<br />
(Yan, 2003). <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>flux <strong>of</strong> Western norms <strong>and</strong> values has<br />
led to evolv<strong>in</strong>g conceptualizations <strong>of</strong> filial piety for contemporary<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese (Lieber, Nihira, & M<strong>in</strong>k, 2004); additionally,<br />
k<strong>in</strong>ship has been supplanted by familiarity ties as <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />
medium to build social networks (Yang, 1994). However,<br />
<strong>the</strong> notion that unique cultural patterns <strong>of</strong> modernization<br />
<strong>in</strong> Asia (or ‘‘Easternization’’; Marsella & Choi, 1993) occur<br />
suggests that Ch<strong>in</strong>a might reta<strong>in</strong> important psychological,<br />
social, <strong>and</strong> cultural structures even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> rapid technological<br />
<strong>and</strong> economic advancement. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
psychological processes enable preservation <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese orientations while simultaneously allow<strong>in</strong>g adaptation<br />
to societal change (Yang, 1998). Hence, we assert<br />
that atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ‘moral’ status <strong>and</strong> uphold<strong>in</strong>g face will rema<strong>in</strong><br />
salient to modern-day Ch<strong>in</strong>ese, even as <strong>the</strong>se values are<br />
transform<strong>in</strong>g as a function <strong>of</strong> modernization. To <strong>the</strong> degree<br />
<strong>the</strong>se dynamics become attenuated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> years ahead may<br />
limit <strong>the</strong>ir future <strong>in</strong>fluence yet still not remove <strong>the</strong>ir legitimacy<br />
as core cultural orientations.<br />
Different roads <strong>of</strong> identification lead<strong>in</strong>g to adult (moral) status<br />
Stafford (1995) <strong>in</strong> his ethnography <strong>of</strong> childhood education<br />
<strong>in</strong> Angang (a fish<strong>in</strong>g village <strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern Taiwan),<br />
describes how children must undergo extensive cultivation<br />
before be<strong>in</strong>g recognized as hav<strong>in</strong>g adult status. <strong>The</strong> popular<br />
view <strong>of</strong> children is that <strong>the</strong>y are not yet full persons (chengren<br />
or adult, literally translates as ‘completed persons’;<br />
Stafford, 1995, p. 19). Most importantly, children are not<br />
regarded as fully formed morally. Stafford expla<strong>in</strong>s how<br />
children learn ‘everyday’ morality transmitted through<br />
family life <strong>and</strong> ‘ord<strong>in</strong>ary’ morality through formal education.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, Stafford describes <strong>the</strong> socialization <strong>of</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese children as first be<strong>in</strong>g a natural process that<br />
emphasizes certa<strong>in</strong> types <strong>of</strong> identification <strong>and</strong> second,<br />
a ‘Confucian’ process <strong>in</strong> which children achieve status as<br />
full-fledged human be<strong>in</strong>gs through learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> selfcultivation.<br />
<strong>The</strong> community immerses <strong>the</strong> child <strong>in</strong> a compulsory<br />
educational process to learn established cultural patterns<br />
<strong>and</strong> to conform to social roles that organize <strong>in</strong>terpersonal<br />
life (Fei, 1992). Morality is transmitted as ‘ord<strong>in</strong>ary knowledge’<br />
<strong>and</strong> appears ‘not to be taught’. Perhaps most powerfully<br />
embedded with<strong>in</strong> everyday life, parents <strong>and</strong> children<br />
are obligated to provide for one ano<strong>the</strong>r. Parents first raise<br />
children. Children <strong>the</strong>n perform filial obligations through<br />
a series <strong>of</strong> family transactions (a ‘learn<strong>in</strong>g environment’).<br />
Adherence to filial obedience becomes so <strong>in</strong>gra<strong>in</strong>ed that it<br />
is perceived as someth<strong>in</strong>g which simply ‘should be done’<br />
( y<strong>in</strong>ggai zuode) (Stafford, 1995, p. 82). To not provide<br />
food for one’s parents merits public scorn – e.g., a common<br />
taunt <strong>in</strong> rural Taiwan is to mock a useless person as a ‘rice<br />
pot’ – i.e., <strong>the</strong>y only eat rice <strong>and</strong> do not produce it (to feed<br />
parents) (Stafford, 1995, p. 96). This obligation to keep parents<br />
well-fed cont<strong>in</strong>ues even after death (through religious<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong>ir spirits; Kipnis, 1997). If this duty is<br />
neglected, <strong>the</strong>se spirits are thought to become hungry<br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011
ghosts who must be placated by <strong>the</strong> general community.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>r parental obligations <strong>in</strong>clude produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>eage, provid<strong>in</strong>g lifetime f<strong>in</strong>ancial support,<br />
<strong>and</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g rituals to ensure that support is susta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> next life. This process is thus an ‘‘.immersion <strong>in</strong> a system<br />
<strong>of</strong> total support (economic, social <strong>and</strong> spiritual),’’ <strong>and</strong><br />
placement <strong>in</strong>to ‘‘.an eternal cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> filial children’’ (Stafford,<br />
1995, p. 86). Yan (2003) has shown that <strong>the</strong>se filial<br />
obligations are weaken<strong>in</strong>g, at least <strong>in</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ch<strong>in</strong>a;<br />
none<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong>y rema<strong>in</strong> ideals, albeit less effective ones.<br />
In contrast to everyday immersion <strong>in</strong> morality, schools<br />
utilize texts that convey dist<strong>in</strong>ct moral rules. Confucian philosophy,<br />
which is commonly transmitted through school<br />
texts, states that commitment to learn<strong>in</strong>g (i.e., achiev<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cultural competence <strong>and</strong> literacy), or self-cultivation, is<br />
essential to <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> properly becom<strong>in</strong>g human. A<br />
fifth-grade textbook <strong>in</strong> Taiwan entitled, ‘‘Study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />
Be<strong>in</strong>g a Person’’ (Qiuxue yu zuoren), emphasizes that <strong>the</strong>se<br />
two values are <strong>in</strong>separable. Modern Taiwanese textbooks<br />
teach a version <strong>of</strong> traditional Ch<strong>in</strong>ese morality emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a moral cont<strong>in</strong>uity from xiao (filial obedience) extend<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
zhong (loyalty/patriotism). Indeed, Tu (1987) states that<br />
‘‘<strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al Confucian <strong>in</strong>tention.is <strong>the</strong> moralization <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> person <strong>in</strong> human relationships’’ (p. 71).<br />
Through <strong>the</strong> everyday <strong>and</strong> formal teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> morality,<br />
children learn how to engage <strong>in</strong> properly ordered human<br />
relationships. Fei (1992) underscores that to become<br />
a true adult is to be connected to o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> to uphold<br />
obligations as def<strong>in</strong>ed by one’s social relationships; failure<br />
to do so is ‘‘to be less than human’’ (p. 25). Thus, participat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> reciprocal familial obligations, achiev<strong>in</strong>g cultivation<br />
through education, <strong>and</strong> becom<strong>in</strong>g a full member <strong>of</strong> a community<br />
constitute achiev<strong>in</strong>g good, adult or ‘moral’ status.<br />
Fundamental characteristics <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese social organization<br />
Fei’s (1992) classic text written from a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese anthropologist’s<br />
viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, describes Ch<strong>in</strong>ese society as consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
‘‘webs woven out <strong>of</strong> countless personal relationships’’<br />
(p. 78). <strong>The</strong>se overlapp<strong>in</strong>g arrangements <strong>of</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>able,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividually centered networks connect each member <strong>of</strong><br />
society <strong>in</strong> multiple ways with vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees <strong>of</strong> attachment<br />
(K<strong>in</strong>g, 1994). A network’s size is established by <strong>the</strong><br />
authority <strong>of</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dividual center; <strong>the</strong> greater a person’s<br />
prestige, <strong>the</strong> denser his or her web <strong>of</strong> horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical<br />
network relations. <strong>The</strong>se networks are highly elastic <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong><br />
or contract <strong>in</strong> response to changes <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s<br />
social power. ‘‘Inner’’ networks consist <strong>of</strong> family <strong>and</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ship<br />
ties 1 which overlap with sets <strong>of</strong> ‘‘outer networks’’ (e.g.,<br />
classmates, friends <strong>of</strong> friends, <strong>and</strong> people from <strong>the</strong> same<br />
region). <strong>The</strong> projection <strong>of</strong> closely def<strong>in</strong>ed k<strong>in</strong>ship relations<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten occurs among <strong>in</strong>timate non-family members, who<br />
are treated as ‘practical k<strong>in</strong>’ (Yang, 1994).<br />
Fei fur<strong>the</strong>r emphasized <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> adherence to<br />
rituals – by develop<strong>in</strong>g self-restra<strong>in</strong>t through rituals, moral<br />
1 Fei describes families as ‘‘small l<strong>in</strong>eages’’ to illustrate how <strong>the</strong> nuclear<br />
family is but one circle among a structure <strong>of</strong> multiple concentric social<br />
circles <strong>and</strong> to underscore <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>herent long-term cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
families.<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11 3<br />
character is <strong>the</strong>n cultivated. Only after achiev<strong>in</strong>g selfcontrol<br />
can one extend <strong>in</strong>to outer circles <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal<br />
relationships. Control thus takes place from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>side<br />
spread<strong>in</strong>g outward – if one upholds one’s morality followed<br />
by his or her close relations (i.e., family), <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> state <strong>and</strong><br />
entire world will be <strong>in</strong> order. In Confucian tradition, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
l<strong>in</strong>eage networks thus become ‘‘<strong>the</strong> medium through<br />
which all activities ‘<strong>and</strong> social structures’ are organized’’<br />
(Fei, 1992, p. 84).<br />
Correction immediately takes place when failure to<br />
learn any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se obligations occurs. Any <strong>in</strong>dividual’s failure<br />
to act appropriately implies that <strong>the</strong> associated social<br />
circle (e.g., parents, teachers, even an entire village) has<br />
not provided proper guidance. Everyone <strong>in</strong> a network<br />
supervises <strong>the</strong> actions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong><br />
obligation are <strong>in</strong>ternalized as follow<strong>in</strong>g one’s heart <strong>and</strong><br />
m<strong>in</strong>d. Aga<strong>in</strong>, recent research <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a suggests that connections<br />
are becom<strong>in</strong>g more pragmatic, but that <strong>the</strong>y still<br />
reta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir structur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> social life (Yan, 2003).<br />
Reciprocity, ‘guanxi’, ‘renq<strong>in</strong>g’ <strong>and</strong> ‘face’<br />
Reciprocity, particularly among family members <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>n society, thus is viewed as a core pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that governs<br />
everyday social behavior <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Yang (1957) first def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> reciprocity (bao) as <strong>the</strong> basis for<br />
social relations. Giv<strong>in</strong>g gifts (liwu) can be viewed as ‘‘<strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>tersubjective medium <strong>of</strong> social transactions <strong>in</strong> local moral<br />
worlds’’ (Kle<strong>in</strong>man & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 1991, p. 277). Gift-giv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
constitutes guanxi, or <strong>the</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> one’s network <strong>of</strong><br />
social connections as def<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> gift-exchange.<br />
Guanxi was <strong>in</strong>itially viewed as personal strategies used to<br />
construct ‘particularistic ties’ (Jacobs, 1979) <strong>and</strong> subsequently<br />
was exp<strong>and</strong>ed to <strong>in</strong>clude elements <strong>of</strong> personal feel<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that accompany <strong>in</strong>strumental <strong>in</strong>tentions (Walder,<br />
1986). 2 More recently, Yan (1996) fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>corporated<br />
<strong>the</strong> centrality <strong>of</strong> moral duties to fulfill obligations as well<br />
as affective <strong>and</strong> economic <strong>in</strong>volvement. Guanxi networks<br />
thus function as <strong>the</strong> objective foundation <strong>of</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dividual’s<br />
local world <strong>and</strong> consist <strong>of</strong> relationships that are cont<strong>in</strong>ually<br />
reproduced through purposeful human efforts.<br />
Decid<strong>in</strong>g who to accept favors from demarcates one’s<br />
range <strong>of</strong> obligations (<strong>and</strong> membership <strong>in</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r’s guanxi<br />
web; K<strong>in</strong>g, 1994). Even shar<strong>in</strong>g food with non-k<strong>in</strong> may be<br />
seen as public acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g guanxi; <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a, public banquets are explicit mechanisms to produce<br />
<strong>and</strong> hold onto extrafamilial guanxi (Yang, 1994). Counterbalanc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
such material exchange, <strong>the</strong> direct <strong>embodiment</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> human feel<strong>in</strong>gs, or ganq<strong>in</strong>g, also plays a particularly<br />
strong role <strong>in</strong> guanxi formation. Thus, publicly weep<strong>in</strong>g at<br />
a funeral is a way <strong>of</strong> claim<strong>in</strong>g relationship to <strong>the</strong> deceased<br />
<strong>and</strong> his or her family (Kipnis, 1997).<br />
Also critically <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> fundamental concepts<br />
<strong>of</strong> reciprocity <strong>and</strong> guanxi is <strong>the</strong> key social norm <strong>of</strong><br />
renq<strong>in</strong>g, or ‘‘a system <strong>of</strong> ethics based on commonsense<br />
knowledge’’ <strong>of</strong> society (Yan, 1996, p. 21), where<br />
2 Yang (1994) also presented guanxi networks as an <strong>in</strong>formal redistributive<br />
power that opposes <strong>the</strong> universalistic distributive ethics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> socialist<br />
state.<br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011
4<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpersonal relations consist <strong>of</strong> both moral <strong>and</strong> emotional<br />
components. In everyday social practice, renq<strong>in</strong>g can be<br />
understood as <strong>the</strong> exchange <strong>of</strong> favors – by repay<strong>in</strong>g an<br />
owed favor with a bigger favor, o<strong>the</strong>rs owe that person<br />
future favors. Obligations must eventually reach a balance<br />
between parties, although to actually settle accounts fully<br />
is to end a relationship, because if favors are not owed, no<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r communication is needed (Yang, 1994). However,<br />
renq<strong>in</strong>g is not simply a matter <strong>of</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g reciprocity<br />
but also embodies <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g overlapp<strong>in</strong>g concepts: (1)<br />
underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g basic emotional responses <strong>in</strong> everyday<br />
social situations; (2) moral duties associated with giftexchange;<br />
(3) a type <strong>of</strong> exchangeable social resource (i.e.,<br />
favor) <strong>and</strong>; (4) one’s guanxi networks (Yan, 2003). Renq<strong>in</strong>g<br />
is based upon <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g (zhanguang or ‘‘to share<br />
<strong>the</strong> light’’); one is morally obligated to share social<br />
resources with network members, which is expressed <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> gives mean<strong>in</strong>g to everyday gift-giv<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Renq<strong>in</strong>g is based upon one’s social ‘face’ (mianzi), or<br />
<strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> social power <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal field<br />
(Hwang, 1987). Renq<strong>in</strong>g first depends on mianzi – one<br />
must <strong>in</strong>itially possess sufficient mianzi to face o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong><br />
to create social networks. Renq<strong>in</strong>g also reflects mianzi –<br />
e.g., at formal ceremonies (wedd<strong>in</strong>gs, funerals), social<br />
status is exhibited by <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> guests <strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
<strong>and</strong> emotional <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>gs provided, thus embody<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> entirety <strong>of</strong> social connections that a family possesses.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, social-transactional dynamics (renq<strong>in</strong>g) are<br />
<strong>in</strong>extricably <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>ed with one’s social status or mianzi.<br />
More recent conceptualizations fur<strong>the</strong>r l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong> construct<br />
<strong>of</strong> moral face, or lian, with <strong>the</strong> deeply embedded<br />
moral obligations located <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> everyday economy <strong>of</strong> reciprocity<br />
<strong>and</strong> social exchange. For example, Yan (2003)<br />
states that, ‘‘One’s failure to fulfill <strong>the</strong> obligation <strong>of</strong> reciprocity,<br />
or to show no consideration for o<strong>the</strong>rs’ feel<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
<strong>and</strong> emotional responses, is regarded as an immoral act’’<br />
(p. 39). Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, moral face consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group’s evaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> a person’s moral reputation, record for fulfill<strong>in</strong>g<br />
social-exchange obligations, <strong>and</strong> status as a good human<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g (Yan, 1996). Lian can thus be seen as reflect<strong>in</strong>g one’s<br />
moral status <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> local world <strong>and</strong> consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />
<strong>and</strong> external prohibitions for moral behaviors. 3 <strong>The</strong> awareness<br />
<strong>of</strong> moral face guides participants’ actions <strong>in</strong> social<br />
exchange <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>jects a moral discourse to social life.<br />
Face <strong>and</strong> guanxi as symbolic <strong>and</strong> social capital<br />
Before discuss<strong>in</strong>g how loss <strong>of</strong> face affects participants <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ir local worlds, we use <strong>the</strong>oretical constructs set forth by<br />
<strong>the</strong> late French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu <strong>in</strong> his analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> mechanisms by which dom<strong>in</strong>ant classes reproduce<br />
structures <strong>of</strong> power, to deepen underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social<br />
constructs <strong>of</strong> guanxi, renq<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> face. We specifically identify<br />
how <strong>the</strong>se Ch<strong>in</strong>ese constructs might map onto different<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> capital that are accumulated, <strong>and</strong> traded, with<strong>in</strong><br />
societies. We do so to fur<strong>the</strong>r ground <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />
3 Social face, or mianzi, represents one’s social prestige ga<strong>the</strong>red via<br />
personal effort or strategic maneuver<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> is based entirely on external<br />
evaluations (Hu, 1944).<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese concepts with<strong>in</strong> a deep <strong>and</strong> systematized social analytic<br />
framework <strong>and</strong> to locate <strong>the</strong>se constructs as local examples<br />
<strong>of</strong> what might represent more universal processes.<br />
Capital is broadly conceptualized by Bourdieu as materialized<br />
<strong>and</strong> convertible ‘social energy’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
labor or accumulated labor <strong>in</strong> an objectified state (Bourdieu,<br />
1986). Face – both moral (lian) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular social<br />
face (mianzi) – can be seen to function as forms <strong>of</strong> symbolic<br />
capital. Such capital (e.g., mianzi as ascribed status accumulated<br />
via effort or clever <strong>in</strong>terpersonal maneuver<strong>in</strong>g) is represented<br />
symbolically because it is set with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> known<br />
‘logic’ <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, is not perceived as capital per se, <strong>and</strong><br />
is <strong>in</strong>stead recognized as a legitimate form <strong>of</strong> competence.<br />
<strong>The</strong> possession <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se forms <strong>of</strong> symbolic capital<br />
are necessary to access <strong>and</strong> to mobilize network resources<br />
(e.g., ideas, <strong>in</strong>formation, money, favors), or social capital.<br />
Analogous to guanxi with<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese societies, social capital<br />
is comprised <strong>of</strong> social obligations (‘‘connections’’), <strong>and</strong><br />
is def<strong>in</strong>ed by Bourdieu (1986) as ‘‘<strong>the</strong> aggregate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
actual or potential resources which are l<strong>in</strong>ked to possession<br />
<strong>of</strong> a durable network.or to membership <strong>in</strong> a group’’ (p.<br />
248). <strong>The</strong> entire social capital held by an <strong>in</strong>dividual is determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> network <strong>of</strong> connections that can be<br />
accessed <strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total capital possessed<br />
by each network member. 4 Each member derives status<br />
from <strong>the</strong>ir potential access to <strong>the</strong> collectively owned capital.<br />
<strong>The</strong> core ‘credential’ that allows <strong>in</strong>dividuals membership<br />
<strong>in</strong>to guanxi (or social capital) networks <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is<br />
cultivation <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>of</strong> moral face (lian). Once<br />
guanxi is established, <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> social face (mianzi)<br />
one possesses <strong>the</strong>n determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> total network resources<br />
that can be mobilized. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Bourdieu, <strong>and</strong> exemplified<br />
by guanxi webs <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, networks <strong>of</strong> social capital are<br />
based on <strong>the</strong> material <strong>and</strong>/or symbolic exchanges which act<br />
to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> re<strong>in</strong>force <strong>the</strong>m. Be<strong>in</strong>g a member <strong>of</strong> a guanxi<br />
network, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>reby establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> reproduc<strong>in</strong>g social<br />
capital to secure material or symbolic pr<strong>of</strong>its, is based on<br />
endless acts <strong>of</strong> sociability <strong>and</strong> series <strong>of</strong> exchanges (<strong>of</strong> gifts,<br />
feel<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>and</strong> words).<br />
Utiliz<strong>in</strong>g frameworks that fur<strong>the</strong>r del<strong>in</strong>eate attributes <strong>of</strong><br />
social capital reveal that guanxi conta<strong>in</strong>s both components<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‘cognitive’ (i.e., perceptions <strong>of</strong> trust, reciprocity <strong>and</strong> support)<br />
<strong>and</strong> ‘structural’ (i.e., extent <strong>of</strong> network l<strong>in</strong>ks or activity)<br />
social capital (Harpham, Grant, & Thomas, 2002).<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>r, guanxi ties may also comprise ‘bond<strong>in</strong>g’ (cooperative<br />
relations between group members who share similar<br />
social identities) <strong>and</strong> ‘bridg<strong>in</strong>g’ (social relations that span<br />
across dist<strong>in</strong>ct socio-demographic groups, such as class)<br />
types (Szreter & Woolcock, 2004). At <strong>the</strong>se formulations’<br />
root, however, is <strong>the</strong> view that social capital is as an ‘accumulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> trust’ that results from <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ will<strong>in</strong>gness<br />
to cooperate with one ano<strong>the</strong>r via norms <strong>of</strong> reciprocity that<br />
facilitate collective action (Putnam, 1993). Such trust <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
groups forms <strong>the</strong> prerequisite for social capital to be<br />
4 <strong>The</strong>orists debate whe<strong>the</strong>r social capital can more accurately be described<br />
as a property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social structure or <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
social environment. To depict guanxi dynamics <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, we utilize Putnam’s<br />
(1993) view that social capital can be conceptualized at a relational<br />
level – that it is a property <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals but only due to <strong>the</strong>ir association<br />
with a group (Szreter & Woolcock, 2004).<br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011
transformed <strong>in</strong>to economic capital (i.e., goods that can be<br />
directly changed <strong>in</strong>to money; Bourdieu, 1986) or <strong>the</strong> direct<br />
‘social energy’ <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, which is why face is so prized, <strong>and</strong><br />
safeguarded, <strong>in</strong> everyday usage.<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> face <strong>and</strong> its effects on <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> networks<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> face (e.g., among those who violate key reciprocity<br />
norms) greatly affects an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s access to social<br />
capital <strong>and</strong> closely parallels how <strong>stigma</strong> works <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
society. <strong>The</strong> motivation to preserve face <strong>of</strong>ten causes adherence<br />
to moral obligations over economic considerations. To<br />
ga<strong>in</strong> a reputation for not participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> gift-exchange<br />
would result <strong>in</strong> los<strong>in</strong>g community trust <strong>and</strong> becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />
isolated without adequate guanxi, which is felt as greatly<br />
embarrass<strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, a popular say<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese village states, ‘‘Suili (obligatory, expressive giftgiv<strong>in</strong>g)<br />
is as urgent as putt<strong>in</strong>g out a fire. It can’t wait. A<br />
man cannot have a firm position <strong>in</strong> front <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs if he fails<br />
to follow <strong>the</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> gift-giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> escapes his duties<br />
(Yan, 1996, p. 76)’’.<br />
Because obligations <strong>of</strong> reciprocity are cultivated s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
childhood, to publicly neglect such obligations is to lose<br />
moral face (lian). To lose lian (diu lian) represents <strong>the</strong> community’s<br />
condemnation for immoral behavior, <strong>and</strong> signifies<br />
‘‘a serious <strong>in</strong>fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral code <strong>of</strong> society’’ (Hu, 1944,<br />
p. 46). To enact such behavior is to act atrociously <strong>and</strong> to be<br />
morally bankrupt, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a depreciation <strong>of</strong> character. 5<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> lian results <strong>in</strong> potential community ostracization –<br />
for <strong>in</strong>stance, isolation dur<strong>in</strong>g important rituals such as<br />
funerals. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> mere threat <strong>of</strong> sanctions typically<br />
leads <strong>of</strong>fenders to reform <strong>the</strong>ir behavior (Fei, 1992).<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> lian also br<strong>in</strong>gs immediate shame to <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fender.<br />
Affect is essential to moral face; a person’s aspirations to<br />
become a moral person are based on feel<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> shame<br />
(chi – Lau, 1984). To lose lian is to experience real dread<br />
that is felt even more strongly than physical fear (Hu,<br />
1944). Yan (1996) provides an example <strong>of</strong> an elder bro<strong>the</strong>r<br />
<strong>in</strong> rural Ch<strong>in</strong>a who failed to live up to a wedd<strong>in</strong>g gift-giv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ritual (<strong>the</strong> most important gift-exchange event); hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
exhausted his money on earlier gift-giv<strong>in</strong>g rounds, he became<br />
filled with unbearable shame <strong>and</strong> fled <strong>the</strong> wedd<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce lian signifies <strong>the</strong> community’s confidence <strong>in</strong> one’s<br />
moral character, severe loss <strong>of</strong> lian places <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
<strong>and</strong> family <strong>in</strong> a despised <strong>and</strong> isolated position. Those who<br />
fail to cultivate guanxi networks are assigned a severely disadvantaged<br />
status, a solitary state viewed as ‘disastrous’<br />
(Kipnis, 1997). To represent <strong>the</strong> ‘social death’ l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />
such persons (<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir associates), Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ch<strong>in</strong>ese terms<br />
use ‘death’ (si) as a modifier (e.g., sipi – ‘‘dead sk<strong>in</strong>’’, six<strong>in</strong>g –<br />
‘‘dead characters’’) to describe <strong>the</strong> closed opportunities <strong>of</strong><br />
such <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ social networks (Yan,1996). One especially<br />
illustrative term – si menzi – means ‘‘dead (closed) doors’’. By<br />
contrast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> popular phrase <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g one’s connections to<br />
obta<strong>in</strong> resources, or ‘‘go<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> back door’’ (zou<br />
homen; K<strong>in</strong>g, 1994), si menzi is a metaphor that describes<br />
5 Loss <strong>of</strong> mianzi (diu mianzi) results from neglect<strong>in</strong>g a social convention<br />
that does not impugn one’s character <strong>and</strong> produces milder shame. Los<strong>in</strong>g<br />
moral face (lian), however, causes complete loss <strong>of</strong> social face (mianzi).<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11 5<br />
a relationship lead<strong>in</strong>g to no fur<strong>the</strong>r resources. Not only are<br />
si menzi without a guanxi network (or from Bourdieu’s<br />
perspective, without social capital), <strong>the</strong>y are also seen as<br />
‘‘not know<strong>in</strong>g how to be a human be<strong>in</strong>g’’ (buhui zuoren) <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ir lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>in</strong> conduct<strong>in</strong>g basic human relations<br />
(Yan, 1996, p. 103). <strong>The</strong>se <strong>in</strong>dividuals face severe social<br />
sanctions <strong>and</strong> isolation from <strong>the</strong>ir local world.<br />
<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> ‘death’ to describe <strong>in</strong>dividuals with whom<br />
one derives no benefit <strong>and</strong> risks moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation illustrates<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r critical facet <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese social life – that danger<br />
is felt to be highly contagious. Exposure to <strong>in</strong>auspicious<br />
(bujili) circumstances (e.g., funerals) endangers one via<br />
malicious <strong>in</strong>fluences (e.g., ghosts, which are a part <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
popular culture) <strong>and</strong> pollution <strong>of</strong> associated networks.<br />
For example, families who have recently experienced<br />
a death are isolated by <strong>the</strong> community for some time, <strong>and</strong><br />
even those who merely attend a funeral will not be <strong>in</strong>vited<br />
to happy events (e.g., wedd<strong>in</strong>gs) due to fears <strong>of</strong> spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />
bad luck or moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation (Stafford, 1995).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se examples highlight an essential aspect <strong>of</strong> guanxi<br />
networks – that designat<strong>in</strong>g people as friends means categoriz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs as enemies. Guanxi-build<strong>in</strong>g is as much<br />
about utiliz<strong>in</strong>g strategies <strong>of</strong> exclusion <strong>and</strong> distanc<strong>in</strong>g as it<br />
is about <strong>in</strong>ternal shar<strong>in</strong>g – e.g., a boss (laoban) will not<br />
allow those perceived as too low <strong>in</strong> status to banquet<br />
with him (Kipnis, 1997). O<strong>the</strong>rs note that face does not<br />
imply equal status but <strong>in</strong>stead ‘‘.functions as a site from<br />
which hierarchical communication is possible’’ (Zito, 1987,<br />
p. 119). How guanxi, renq<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> face come to be constructed<br />
thus powerfully reflect local processes <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion,<br />
exclusion, <strong>and</strong> power <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> schizophrenia <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
To illustrate how <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> is <strong>in</strong>terwoven<br />
with loss <strong>of</strong> face <strong>and</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, we discuss two <strong>stigma</strong>tized<br />
conditions – schizophrenia <strong>and</strong> AIDS – <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Sociopolitically, Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s delay <strong>in</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g a national mental<br />
health law that clearly del<strong>in</strong>eates <strong>the</strong> legal rights <strong>of</strong> people<br />
with mental illness <strong>and</strong> guarantees access to treatment<br />
(Shan, 2007) contributes to negative stereotyp<strong>in</strong>g, anticipated<br />
devaluation, <strong>and</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation reported by people<br />
with schizophrenia across multiple life doma<strong>in</strong>s (Yang<br />
et al., 2007). Yet <strong>the</strong> traditional viewpo<strong>in</strong>t that cultivation<br />
<strong>of</strong> restra<strong>in</strong>t is <strong>in</strong>tegral to moral character fur<strong>the</strong>r shapes<br />
how mental illness <strong>stigma</strong> is felt. In Confucian thought,<br />
one must learn to control oneself before exert<strong>in</strong>g social<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence (Lau, 1984). Partly due to public beliefs <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
that people with mental illness act dangerously <strong>and</strong> unpredictably<br />
(Phillips & Gao, 1999), we propose that such persons<br />
are viewed as not fully cultivated <strong>and</strong> thus<br />
<strong>in</strong>competent to participate <strong>in</strong> social life. People with psychiatric<br />
illness are thought to exhibit a ‘moral bankruptcy’ that<br />
relegates <strong>the</strong>m to a moral level <strong>of</strong> not fully ‘adult’ status.<br />
Etiological beliefs <strong>of</strong> mental illness fur<strong>the</strong>r assign a moral<br />
‘defect’ to sufferers <strong>and</strong> families (Yang, 2007); popular Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
beliefs imply that hav<strong>in</strong>g mental illness <strong>in</strong> this lifetime<br />
entails moral wrongdo<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a prior life (Stafford, 1995).<br />
That people with schizophrenia are not regarded as fully<br />
competent morally is depicted by suicide surveys <strong>in</strong> rural<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a not count<strong>in</strong>g such <strong>in</strong>dividuals (Wu, 2005).<br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011
6<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> perceived <strong>in</strong>competence – that a person with<br />
schizophrenia will embarrass <strong>the</strong> family <strong>and</strong> lower <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
moral status – families <strong>and</strong> health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals express<br />
<strong>stigma</strong> via <strong>in</strong>fantiliz<strong>in</strong>g responses. This attitude is evident<br />
among 63% <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g psychiatric hospital<br />
nurses who agreed that people with mental illness<br />
‘‘.need <strong>the</strong> same k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> control <strong>and</strong> discipl<strong>in</strong>e as a young<br />
child’’ (Sevigny et al., 1999). Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese psychiatric<br />
hospital patients have been made to s<strong>in</strong>g songs <strong>and</strong><br />
dance like children <strong>in</strong> a classroom (Pearson, 1995). Fur<strong>the</strong>r,<br />
emotional attitudes <strong>of</strong> family members towards schizophrenia<br />
patients are predom<strong>in</strong>antly those <strong>of</strong> emotional<br />
over<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>and</strong> overprotectiveness ra<strong>the</strong>r than outright<br />
criticism <strong>and</strong> hostility (Yang, 2003). This <strong>and</strong> related<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation lead to underm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
patient’s self-confidence (endorsed by >88% <strong>of</strong> subjects <strong>in</strong><br />
a Beij<strong>in</strong>g patient sample; Phillips & Gao, 1999). Such <strong>in</strong>fantilization<br />
leads to loss <strong>of</strong> aspirations, which contributes to<br />
concrete practical losses such as failure to achieve marriage<br />
<strong>and</strong> employment. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, people with schizophrenia<br />
<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a have employment rates roughly half that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
age group, are almost twice as likely not to get married,<br />
<strong>and</strong> experience divorce rates nearly 10 times <strong>the</strong> population<br />
norm (Phillips, 1993). To not marry <strong>and</strong> not have children<br />
is viewed as a fur<strong>the</strong>r ‘‘.move towards achiev<strong>in</strong>g<br />
non-personhood’’ (Stafford, 1995, p. 28).<br />
Due to moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation, people with mental illness<br />
are excluded from participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> renq<strong>in</strong>g, or basic human<br />
reciprocity. For example, Hong Kong respondents are overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
more likely to agree that it ‘‘.would not be<br />
wise to show any favors’’ (thus <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> one’s<br />
guanxi web) to a person with schizophrenia when compared<br />
with non-Ch<strong>in</strong>ese British respondents (Furnham &<br />
Chan, 2004). Stigma <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a also quickly moves from <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual to his/her family, which threatens to break <strong>the</strong><br />
vital connections (‘quanxi wang’) l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g families to social<br />
networks <strong>of</strong> resources <strong>and</strong> life chances. For example, over<br />
a majority (54.3%) <strong>of</strong> 1491 relatives <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
patients <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a reported experienc<strong>in</strong>g at least some<br />
adverse effects from <strong>stigma</strong> (Phillips, Pearson, Li, Xu, &<br />
Yang, 2002). <strong>The</strong> entire social network is fur<strong>the</strong>r viewed<br />
as <strong>in</strong>auspicious or contam<strong>in</strong>ated, <strong>of</strong>ten lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />
expulsion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>and</strong> family to protect<br />
<strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g network. Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, between 59 <strong>and</strong><br />
69% <strong>of</strong> patient samples <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong <strong>and</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g report<br />
that <strong>stigma</strong> leads families to deny or hide <strong>the</strong> mental illness<br />
(Lee, Lee, Chiu, & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 2005; Phillips & Gao, 1999),<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> delays <strong>and</strong> non-adherence to psychiatric treatment<br />
(Lee, Chiu, Tsang, Chui, & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 2006).<br />
‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> AIDS <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
<strong>The</strong> moral weight associated with HIV/AIDS <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a is greatly compounded by views common across cultures<br />
that immoral behaviors give rise to HIV-positive status.<br />
That <strong>the</strong>se moral components supersede even concerns<br />
<strong>of</strong> illness <strong>in</strong>fection is suggested by Mak et al. (2006) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
Hong Kong study which revealed much greater <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> general population towards HIV/AIDS when compared<br />
with tuberculosis <strong>and</strong> SARS (Mak et al., 2006). Such moral<br />
judgments commonly focus on behaviors perceived to be<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />
associated with HIV, such as drug use, commercial sex, or<br />
homosexuality. For example, <strong>in</strong> a separate Hong Kong sample,<br />
a significant proportion believed that people with HIV/<br />
AIDS were sexually promiscuous (Lau & Tsui, 2005). Fur<strong>the</strong>r,<br />
<strong>in</strong> a study <strong>of</strong> pregnant women from Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
(<strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce with <strong>the</strong> highest reported prevalence <strong>of</strong> HIV),<br />
nearly half felt that AIDS was solely a disease <strong>of</strong> ‘‘low class<br />
<strong>and</strong> illegal people’’ (Hesketh, Duo, Li, & Tomk<strong>in</strong>s, 2005).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se perceptions are fueled by Ch<strong>in</strong>ese media depictions<br />
<strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS patients as act<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>and</strong> immoral<br />
ways (i.e., as <strong>in</strong>tentionally <strong>in</strong>fect<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>rs; J<strong>in</strong>g, 2006).<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> severe moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation from such<br />
behavior, lian is immediately threatened through depreciation<br />
<strong>of</strong> moral character result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> potential social exclusion<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> families. S<strong>in</strong>ce 80% <strong>of</strong> all HIV/AIDS<br />
cases occur <strong>in</strong> rural regions, <strong>the</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> los<strong>in</strong>g moral<br />
face may rema<strong>in</strong> particularly strong (He & Detels, 2005).<br />
Moral judgments give rise to <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g community<br />
beliefs, with up to 75–81% <strong>of</strong> subjects <strong>in</strong> Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
endors<strong>in</strong>g at least some social distance towards people<br />
with HIV/AIDS (Hesketh et al., 2005). Because HIV/AIDS<br />
<strong>stigma</strong> also morally sta<strong>in</strong>s family members, family ties<br />
become threatened, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> relatives rout<strong>in</strong>ely discrim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st patients – nearly half <strong>of</strong> a Hong Kong<br />
patient sample reported at least a moderate level <strong>of</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
from relatives (Lau et al., 2003). A study <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Dai ethnic m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>in</strong> rural Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
revealed beliefs <strong>of</strong> family contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> bodies<br />
<strong>of</strong> drug abus<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>and</strong> frequently HIV-positive) family members<br />
were buried <strong>in</strong> separate graveyards so that <strong>the</strong>ir evil<br />
spirits would not <strong>in</strong>fect ancestors <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g (Deng, Li,<br />
Sr<strong>in</strong>gernyuang, & Zhang, 2007). Extreme discrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
towards relatives who rema<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ked to sufferers frequently<br />
occurs – e.g., (un<strong>in</strong>fected) children <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS patients<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g repeatedly refused school<strong>in</strong>g (J<strong>in</strong>g, 2006).<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r area where moral condemnation powerfully<br />
impacts people with HIV/AIDS is <strong>the</strong> healthcare system.<br />
Although <strong>in</strong>itially slow to respond, <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese government<br />
has s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>itiated free healthcare <strong>and</strong> prevention<br />
programs – such as <strong>the</strong> ‘‘Four Frees <strong>and</strong> One Care’’ policy –<br />
to curb <strong>the</strong> virus’ spread (He & Detels, 2005). Despite generally<br />
strong legislation that protects confidentiality <strong>and</strong><br />
guarantees access <strong>and</strong> equality <strong>of</strong> treatment, <strong>stigma</strong><br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ues to take place dur<strong>in</strong>g healthcare practice (Yang,<br />
Zhang, Chan, & Reidpath, 2005). That <strong>stigma</strong> occurs <strong>in</strong>terpersonally<br />
despite legislative protection illustrates how<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g rema<strong>in</strong>s key. For <strong>in</strong>stance, doctors<br />
<strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn Ch<strong>in</strong>a have contested treatment <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />
patients as ‘‘a waste <strong>of</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>e on a lowly (or morally<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ated) <strong>in</strong>dividual’’ (J<strong>in</strong>g, 2006, p. 167). Similar<br />
views were endorsed by one health pr<strong>of</strong>essional sample<br />
<strong>in</strong> Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce – 30% were ‘‘unwill<strong>in</strong>g’’ <strong>and</strong> 81%<br />
‘‘preferred not’’ to treat HIV-positive patients (Hesketh<br />
et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong>se attitudes also contribute to differential<br />
treatment based on practices <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>of</strong>ten un<strong>in</strong>formed)<br />
HIV-test<strong>in</strong>g that results <strong>in</strong> deny<strong>in</strong>g treatment services for<br />
HIV-positive patients <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g hospitals (Yang et al., 2005).<br />
Fear <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> face has greatly discouraged <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
from seek<strong>in</strong>g HIV-test<strong>in</strong>g; hold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g beliefs<br />
have been associated with decreased likelihood <strong>of</strong> seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />
voluntary HIV-test<strong>in</strong>g (Liu et al., 2005). Effective HIV<br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011
treatment is fur<strong>the</strong>r delayed by <strong>in</strong>itial self-treatment<br />
through pharmacy visits, subsequent help-seek<strong>in</strong>g at private<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>ics to protect privacy, f<strong>in</strong>ally lead<strong>in</strong>g to treatment<br />
at public hospitals or STD cl<strong>in</strong>ics despite <strong>the</strong>ir better quality<br />
<strong>and</strong> lower cost (Lieber, Li, Wu, Ro<strong>the</strong>ram-Borus, & Guan,<br />
2006). Consequently, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> estimated 840,000 HIV <strong>in</strong>fections<br />
<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, only 6% have been tested <strong>and</strong> recorded<br />
(Wu, Kem<strong>in</strong>g, & Cui, 2004). Ra<strong>the</strong>r than risk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tense<br />
community (<strong>and</strong> familial) rejection, <strong>the</strong> vast majority <strong>of</strong><br />
those <strong>in</strong>fected rema<strong>in</strong> unaware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir disease status,<br />
thus greatly foster<strong>in</strong>g medical noncompliance <strong>and</strong> transmission<br />
opportunities. Undetected cases constitute a grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
public health threat <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a as reported HIV <strong>in</strong>fections<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased from 30% <strong>in</strong> 2000 to 122% <strong>in</strong> 2003, <strong>and</strong> if left<br />
unchecked, could grow to 10 million by 2015 (Hesketh<br />
et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2004).<br />
A <strong>stigma</strong> model for Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Based on our conceptual analysis <strong>and</strong> review, we propose<br />
a three-layered model (see Fig. 1) to conceptualize<br />
Three Layers <strong>of</strong> Stigma <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Societal Factors Influenc<strong>in</strong>g Stigma<br />
a) Public Conceptions <strong>of</strong> Stigmatized<br />
Conditions<br />
b) Institutional Forms <strong>of</strong> Stigma<br />
-‘Field’ or Structures <strong>of</strong> Capital<br />
Change <strong>in</strong> Moral Aspects <strong>of</strong> Stigma<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> Face (or ‘Symbolic Capital’)<br />
how societal features <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> moral status<br />
result <strong>in</strong> adverse local outcomes <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Societal factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>stigma</strong><br />
- Moral – Emotional (i.e., Emotional Reactions)<br />
- Moral – Somatic (i.e. Physical Manifestations)<br />
-<br />
-<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11 7<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> Subjective, Collective, <strong>and</strong> Interpersonal<br />
Aspects <strong>of</strong> Stigma<br />
a) Subjective/ Individual Aspects<br />
b) Collective Aspects<br />
Between Family Members<br />
Between Social Network Members<br />
c) Interpersonal Aspects<br />
- Physician Stigma<br />
- Family Member Status<br />
- Loss <strong>of</strong> Guanxi (or Access to ‘Social Capital’)<br />
Fig. 1. A <strong>stigma</strong> model for Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
<strong>The</strong> top layer <strong>of</strong> our model consists <strong>of</strong> societal-level factors.<br />
Like o<strong>the</strong>r models, we have identified public conceptions<br />
(i.e., cultural stereotypes, social hierarchies <strong>and</strong><br />
sociopolitical ideology – Corrigan & Watson, 2002) <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>stitutional forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> (i.e., structural mechanisms<br />
that arise from economic, political <strong>and</strong> historical sources –<br />
Corrigan et al., 2004) as macrosocial factors that determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>stigma</strong>’s effects <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se structural forms, we<br />
highlight <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> ‘‘field’’, or structures <strong>of</strong> capital<br />
which Bourdieu (1986) def<strong>in</strong>es as, ‘‘.<strong>the</strong> unequal distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> capital’’ (i.e., economic, cultural, <strong>and</strong> social) <strong>and</strong>,<br />
‘‘.<strong>the</strong> power to impose <strong>the</strong> laws <strong>of</strong> function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
field most favorable to ‘current structures <strong>of</strong>’ capital <strong>and</strong><br />
its reproduction’’ (p. 246). From this perspective, how different<br />
capital is distributed at a given time represents <strong>the</strong><br />
configuration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social world, determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> specific<br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011
8<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> capital as well as <strong>the</strong> potential success <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />
from social-exchange practices. Includ<strong>in</strong>g this construct<br />
highlights how <strong>stigma</strong> powerfully affects <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ capacities<br />
to mobilize social capital (i.e., network resources)<br />
<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> moral aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> second layer consists <strong>of</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> – specifically, los<strong>in</strong>g face or <strong>the</strong> ‘symbolic<br />
capital’ needed to access network resources. Although loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> face occurs simultaneously <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>separably from subjective<br />
<strong>and</strong> collective aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>, <strong>the</strong> position<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
moral components as <strong>in</strong>termediary emphasizes <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
central role <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>stigma</strong>. <strong>The</strong> potential mediat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
role <strong>of</strong> face is fur<strong>the</strong>r suggested by Mak et al. (2007), who<br />
report <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequacy <strong>of</strong> an attributional model alone <strong>in</strong><br />
expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g self-<strong>stigma</strong> among Hong Kong HIV-patients<br />
(Mak et al., 2007).<br />
Although loss <strong>of</strong> face exhibits features identifiable from<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>stigma</strong> conceptualizations (Jones et al., 1984) – e.g.,<br />
perceptions <strong>of</strong> responsibility (that AIDS patients engage<br />
<strong>in</strong> risky behaviors), peril (moral contam<strong>in</strong>ation can be<br />
transmitted), <strong>and</strong> concealability (face can be preserved if<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tized status rema<strong>in</strong>s unexposed), los<strong>in</strong>g face<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>s phenomenologically dist<strong>in</strong>ct from any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />
classifications. <strong>The</strong> precise mechanisms by which a <strong>stigma</strong>tized<br />
condition might lose face <strong>in</strong> a local sett<strong>in</strong>g (e.g.,<br />
through <strong>the</strong> above <strong>stigma</strong> dimensions or local mean<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
such as those attached with perceived ancestor misbehavior)<br />
rema<strong>in</strong> a critical area <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> subjective, collective, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong><br />
Because face constitutes a ‘total social phenomenon’<br />
(Mauss, 1967), our third layer comprises three separate but<br />
<strong>in</strong>terrelated levels consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>’s effects on actors<br />
<strong>in</strong> a social world. At <strong>the</strong> subjective (or <strong>in</strong>dividual) level, we<br />
propose that <strong>stigma</strong> is moral–emotional as values – or moral<br />
states – are l<strong>in</strong>ked to affect. Becom<strong>in</strong>g discredited with<strong>in</strong><br />
a moralistic system leads to discrete emotional conditions<br />
(e.g., humiliation) as loss <strong>of</strong> lian (or moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g) among<br />
community o<strong>the</strong>rs is powerfully felt as shame or humiliation.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>r, we assert that <strong>stigma</strong> is moral–somatic. Societal<br />
values are l<strong>in</strong>ked to one’s physiology as loss <strong>of</strong> face has<br />
somatopsychic expression. Such physical manifestations<br />
have been revealed as one’s face ‘crumbl<strong>in</strong>g away’ or as<br />
a way <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g ‘faceless’ (Kle<strong>in</strong>man & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 1993).<br />
At <strong>the</strong> collective level, we conceive that <strong>stigma</strong> occurs<br />
between family members <strong>and</strong> network associates. Loss <strong>of</strong><br />
lian spans collective experience, as <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g shame creates<br />
a ‘‘magnetic field <strong>of</strong> human emotion’’ felt by a group<br />
which also shapes <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual’s heart-m<strong>in</strong>d (x<strong>in</strong>; Sun,<br />
1987). For example, public disclosure <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s<br />
shame creates a collective subject among those shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that shame. This collective humiliation can be conceptualized<br />
as an <strong>in</strong>teractive process – with <strong>the</strong> words, gestures,<br />
mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>gs occurr<strong>in</strong>g between actors (or ‘<strong>in</strong>tersubjective<br />
space’ – Yang et al., 2007) as essential to <strong>stigma</strong><br />
as <strong>the</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> each actor.<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal level <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong>cludes all <strong>in</strong>dividualto-<strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g social<br />
distanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> rejection. Our analysis highlights physician<br />
<strong>and</strong> family member <strong>stigma</strong> as particularly salient <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
In addition, loss <strong>of</strong> guanxi or social capital – i.e., loss <strong>of</strong><br />
social opportunities to achieve desired social statuses<br />
such as marriage, <strong>and</strong> dim<strong>in</strong>ished access to material<br />
resources (via social-exchange networks) – also constitutes<br />
a crucial aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal <strong>stigma</strong>. Because loss <strong>of</strong> face<br />
compromises one’s moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a local community<br />
<strong>and</strong> access to social resources, <strong>stigma</strong> is fur<strong>the</strong>r seen to<br />
directly threaten <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal engagements that<br />
def<strong>in</strong>e what is most at stake for ord<strong>in</strong>ary Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>in</strong> everyday<br />
life (Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 1998).<br />
Anti-<strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a – ‘restor<strong>in</strong>g’ face<br />
With this formulation, we propose to combat <strong>stigma</strong> via<br />
<strong>the</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> face for <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> families. Ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
than recommend<strong>in</strong>g macro-level strategies, we <strong>in</strong>stead<br />
focus <strong>in</strong>terventions on <strong>the</strong> local contexts related to moral<br />
status. We utilize previous empirical work regard<strong>in</strong>g anti<strong>stigma</strong><br />
strategies to <strong>in</strong>form such <strong>in</strong>terventions (Corrigan,<br />
2005; Thornicr<strong>of</strong>t, 2006; see pioneer<strong>in</strong>g work by Phillips<br />
& Gao, 1999); however, additional research is needed to tailor<br />
our recommendations to specific conditions <strong>and</strong> locales.<br />
To address <strong>the</strong> physical <strong>and</strong> emotional consequences<br />
caused by loss <strong>of</strong> moral status, we recommend what might<br />
be termed ‘‘remoralization’’ counsel<strong>in</strong>g that presumes that<br />
<strong>stigma</strong>tized <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> families have lost moral face<br />
(i.e., are ‘demoralized’) <strong>and</strong> consequently excluded from<br />
exchange networks (or face this danger). <strong>The</strong> first component<br />
<strong>of</strong> counsel<strong>in</strong>g seeks to counteract <strong>in</strong>ternalized <strong>stigma</strong><br />
(or ‘self-<strong>stigma</strong>’; Corrigan & Watson, 2002) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> emotional<br />
<strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> humiliation by replac<strong>in</strong>g notions <strong>of</strong><br />
moral depreciation (i.e., be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> ‘outcast’ or not ‘full’ adult<br />
status) with conceptions that even those with chronic<br />
illnesses are capable <strong>of</strong> uphold<strong>in</strong>g community obligations<br />
<strong>and</strong> contribut<strong>in</strong>g productively to society (Lau & Tsui,<br />
2005). Techniques from <strong>the</strong>rapies to modify cognitive schemata<br />
might productively facilitate such change (Corrigan,<br />
2005). To rebuild <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ abilities to partake <strong>in</strong> social<br />
exchange, a second component <strong>in</strong>volves ‘coach<strong>in</strong>g’ strategies<br />
to reach desired vocational <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal outcomes<br />
(e.g., employment, dat<strong>in</strong>g; Thornicr<strong>of</strong>t, 2006).<br />
Rebuild<strong>in</strong>g moral status, or possess<strong>in</strong>g a ‘‘trustworthy <strong>and</strong><br />
loyal’’ character, was regarded as important by >80% <strong>of</strong><br />
a sample <strong>of</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Hong Kong employers (Tsang<br />
et al., 2007). Such ‘‘remoralization coach<strong>in</strong>g’’ consists <strong>of</strong><br />
occupational support to rapidly locate <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> competitive<br />
employment <strong>and</strong> advice regard<strong>in</strong>g how to cope<br />
with common forms <strong>of</strong> job-related discrim<strong>in</strong>ation. Employment<br />
will provide <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>the</strong> capacity to reciprocate<br />
with o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> to access social channels that are prerequisite<br />
to f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a spouse. Additionally, nuanced strategies <strong>of</strong><br />
‘selectively disclos<strong>in</strong>g’ (i.e., occurr<strong>in</strong>g on different levels by<br />
place, sett<strong>in</strong>g or behavior; Corrigan, 2005) a <strong>stigma</strong>tized<br />
status to employers, <strong>and</strong> potential romantic partners,<br />
constitutes a crucial element <strong>of</strong> this approach.<br />
We also recommend that <strong>the</strong>se ‘‘remoralization’’ strategies<br />
are implemented via multiple-family groups which<br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011
have been used to successfully treat schizophrenia <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
(Xiong et al., 1994). 6 <strong>The</strong> first goal is to legitimize <strong>the</strong> idea<br />
that powerful forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> occur among family<br />
members (Lau et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2005) <strong>and</strong> to exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />
possible <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g responses with<strong>in</strong> each family. Counteract<strong>in</strong>g<br />
perceived threats to relatives’ moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
due to associative or ‘‘courtesy’’ <strong>stigma</strong> (G<strong>of</strong>fman, 1963)<br />
acts to reduce discrim<strong>in</strong>atory attitudes towards <strong>the</strong> patient<br />
as well as <strong>the</strong> family’s ‘collective shame’. Mobiliz<strong>in</strong>g family<br />
cooperation facilitates patient recovery, as relatives aid <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> disclosure process, daily activities, f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>and</strong> medical<br />
assistance, <strong>and</strong> psychological support (Li et al., 2006).<br />
After re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>trafamilial solidarity, treatment <strong>the</strong>n<br />
might shift to legitimiz<strong>in</strong>g extrafamilial discrim<strong>in</strong>ation felt<br />
by families (Lee et al., 2005), which is reframed as a form <strong>of</strong><br />
unjust treatment (Wu, 2005). Along with a cl<strong>in</strong>ician, a suitably<br />
tra<strong>in</strong>ed family member ‘consultant’ (Phillips & Gao,<br />
1999) could co-lead each multiple-family group, <strong>and</strong> role<br />
model successful adaptation to <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g circumstance.<br />
Shar<strong>in</strong>g between families <strong>of</strong> cop<strong>in</strong>g experiences is<br />
viewed as a mobilization or empowerment strategy (Corrigan,<br />
2005), whereby shameful feel<strong>in</strong>gs are transformed<br />
<strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>creased self-worth <strong>and</strong> enhanced moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Communicat<strong>in</strong>g feel<strong>in</strong>gs between families also produces<br />
embodied ganq<strong>in</strong>g, or human emotion, which reconstitutes<br />
a complementary guanxi web to share favors <strong>and</strong> exchange<br />
resources with (Kipnis, 1997) before reentry is renegotiated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to one’s primary guanxi network. <strong>The</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tra<br />
<strong>and</strong> extra-familial <strong>stigma</strong>, mobilization <strong>of</strong> family commitments,<br />
<strong>and</strong> rebuild<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> guanxi networks results <strong>in</strong> raised<br />
moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, trust, <strong>and</strong> reciprocity among <strong>in</strong>dividuals –<br />
constructs l<strong>in</strong>ked with facilitat<strong>in</strong>g social networks <strong>and</strong> positive<br />
perceptions <strong>of</strong> health among rural Ch<strong>in</strong>ese (Yip et al.,<br />
2007).<br />
To counter physician <strong>stigma</strong>, we propose state <strong>and</strong> local<br />
government-sponsored dialogues between people with<br />
<strong>stigma</strong>tized conditions <strong>and</strong> healthcare pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to<br />
change disempower<strong>in</strong>g attitudes entrenched <strong>in</strong> healthcare<br />
(Corrigan, 2005; Phillips & Gao, 1999). <strong>The</strong>se formal, faceto-face<br />
dialogues would provide a non-confrontational<br />
forum to discuss how physician actions contribute to <strong>the</strong><br />
loss <strong>of</strong> patients’ <strong>and</strong> family members’ moral status (e.g.,<br />
<strong>in</strong>fantilization perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to schizophrenia). <strong>The</strong>se discourses<br />
should target current providers <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular<br />
medical students to counteract <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g attitudes<br />
while not fully formed (Thornicr<strong>of</strong>t, 2006). To maximize<br />
efficacy <strong>of</strong> this contact-based <strong>in</strong>tervention (which has <strong>the</strong><br />
most empirical support <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>stigma</strong>), <strong>stigma</strong>tized<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals who moderately disconfirm group stereotypes<br />
should be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> ongo<strong>in</strong>g dialogues that exhibit (1)<br />
equal status between groups; (2) common goals; (3) cooperative<br />
efforts; <strong>and</strong> (4) authorized sanction (Corrigan,<br />
2005). Although substantial cultural barriers (i.e., low government<br />
priority towards <strong>stigma</strong>tized <strong>in</strong>dividuals; also, few<br />
6 To treat <strong>in</strong>dividuals ab<strong>and</strong>oned due to <strong>stigma</strong>, we recommend establish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
government-funded shelters for such persons to receive psychological<br />
<strong>and</strong> medication counsel<strong>in</strong>g, vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, peer support,<br />
<strong>and</strong> to share <strong>in</strong> a ‘‘family concept’’. Reconciliation with families can be attempted<br />
after 3–6 months after patient stabilization (such as among AIDS<br />
patients <strong>in</strong> Malaysia; Edwards, 2007).<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11 9<br />
AIDS <strong>and</strong> schizophrenia advocacy groups exist; J<strong>in</strong>g, 2006;<br />
Phillips & Gao, 1999) work aga<strong>in</strong>st implement<strong>in</strong>g this<br />
approach, <strong>in</strong>itial trials might be developed as experimental<br />
<strong>in</strong>terventions at research-affiliated hospitals <strong>and</strong> subsequently<br />
dissem<strong>in</strong>ated more broadly.<br />
Face applied to a cross-cultural underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>stigma</strong><br />
Revealed through our analysis <strong>of</strong> face <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> unacknowledged<br />
by previous <strong>stigma</strong> models, we propose<br />
a cross-cultural formulation that <strong>stigma</strong> also deeply reflects<br />
a fundamentally moral process <strong>in</strong> which <strong>stigma</strong>tized conditions<br />
threaten what is most at stake for sufferers. Los<strong>in</strong>g<br />
face, by represent<strong>in</strong>g a person’s loss <strong>of</strong> moral st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g,<br />
illustrates how <strong>stigma</strong> is embedded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral life <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals. <strong>The</strong> uphold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> face to achieve<br />
opportunities for <strong>in</strong>dividuals to marry, have children, <strong>and</strong><br />
perpetuate <strong>the</strong> family structure constitute core lived values<br />
around which many social groups <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a revolve. Uphold<strong>in</strong>g<br />
face thus exemplifies a ‘‘moral mode’’ <strong>of</strong> experience, or<br />
moral experience, which refers to that register <strong>of</strong> everyday<br />
life <strong>and</strong> practical engagement that def<strong>in</strong>es what matters<br />
most for ord<strong>in</strong>ary people <strong>in</strong> a local world, such as status,<br />
money, life chances, health, or relationships (Kle<strong>in</strong>man,<br />
1998). We conceive <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> as a fundamentally moral<br />
issue – that <strong>stigma</strong>tized conditions threaten what deeply<br />
matters for those <strong>in</strong> a local world who are engaged <strong>in</strong> a process<br />
<strong>of</strong> gripp<strong>in</strong>g life <strong>and</strong> preserv<strong>in</strong>g what matters. Put differently,<br />
while <strong>stigma</strong> affects many life doma<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>stigma</strong>’s<br />
lived experience is felt to coalesce around those engagements<br />
or life doma<strong>in</strong>s that are felt to matter most to<br />
sufferers, responders, <strong>and</strong> observers. In Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tized<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d what is held as most dear – moral face – to be<br />
seriously menaced. This threat is also felt by <strong>stigma</strong>tizers,<br />
who respond us<strong>in</strong>g discrim<strong>in</strong>ation as pragmatic responses<br />
to what <strong>the</strong>y underst<strong>and</strong> to be real danger to preserv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir face. In Ch<strong>in</strong>a, what matters most is uphold<strong>in</strong>g face,<br />
but <strong>the</strong> core lived values that def<strong>in</strong>e dist<strong>in</strong>ct moral worlds<br />
<strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sett<strong>in</strong>gs will be locally constituted (e.g., <strong>in</strong> local<br />
U.S. contexts, <strong>the</strong>se might be <strong>the</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
freedoms; Yang et al., 2007). <strong>The</strong> focus on moral experience<br />
reconceptualizes how <strong>the</strong> social world shapes <strong>stigma</strong> by<br />
allow<strong>in</strong>g a more adequate underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> behaviors<br />
<strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tized <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tizers, for it allows<br />
us to see both as <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g, liv<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> react<strong>in</strong>g to what<br />
is most at stake <strong>and</strong> what is most threatened.<br />
Our analysis also highlights <strong>stigma</strong>’s impact on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual’s<br />
ability to mobilize sources <strong>of</strong> social capital. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
than Kurzban <strong>and</strong> Leary (2001) who emphasize poor capacity<br />
for social exchange as a reason for <strong>stigma</strong>tization, <strong>the</strong><br />
l<strong>in</strong>ks between <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> social capital rema<strong>in</strong> largely<br />
unarticulated. <strong>The</strong> ‘social support’ conceptualization <strong>of</strong><br />
social capital <strong>and</strong> health – whereby one’s ability to draw<br />
upon resources through connections is central to objective<br />
<strong>and</strong> subjective welfare (Kawachi, Kim, Coutts, & Subramanian,<br />
2004) – appears most relevant to <strong>stigma</strong>. <strong>The</strong> literature<br />
l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g perception <strong>of</strong> low SES with prolonged states<br />
<strong>of</strong> anxiety <strong>and</strong> arousal, ultimately result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> long-term<br />
health problems, might fruitfully be applied to <strong>stigma</strong> (Wilk<strong>in</strong>son,<br />
1996). Because loss <strong>of</strong> social capital appears to be<br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011
10<br />
a significant determ<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>of</strong> healthcare access, mental<br />
health, mortality, <strong>and</strong> health status (Szreter & Woolcock,<br />
2004), this construct also suggests an important pathway<br />
to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>’s effects. For example, <strong>stigma</strong> might affect<br />
mental health by endanger<strong>in</strong>g access to both ‘structural’<br />
(i.e., <strong>in</strong>stitutions that provide treatment services) <strong>and</strong> ‘cognitive’<br />
(i.e., trust that <strong>in</strong>creases feel<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> security) aspects<br />
<strong>of</strong> social capital (Harpham et al., 2002). Future studies<br />
might also specify how <strong>stigma</strong> threatens entitlement to<br />
specific material or <strong>in</strong>formational resources <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> ability<br />
to ga<strong>in</strong> from <strong>the</strong>m, capabilities which are commonly mediated<br />
through one’s social connections. Although <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong><br />
guanxi provides an especially vivid example, we propose<br />
that our analysis <strong>of</strong> how <strong>stigma</strong> adversely affects mobilization<br />
<strong>of</strong> social capital <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a may extend to o<strong>the</strong>r cultures,<br />
particularly when network- <strong>and</strong> connection-based exchanges<br />
occur more frequently as opposed to where capitalist<br />
<strong>and</strong> marketplace transactions predom<strong>in</strong>ate.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Our central concern is that <strong>stigma</strong> be reconceived as<br />
a moral process. Through our analysis <strong>of</strong> face <strong>and</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>,<br />
we propose that moral status, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects that <strong>stigma</strong><br />
has on limit<strong>in</strong>g social capital, be viewed as crucial to empirical<br />
research aimed at better underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sources<br />
<strong>and</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, we propose that<br />
efforts at de<strong>stigma</strong>tization be developed to improve moral<br />
status so that evaluation studies can determ<strong>in</strong>e if this<br />
<strong>stigma</strong> approach can benefit policy <strong>and</strong> programs both<br />
with<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r cross-cultural sett<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
<strong>The</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> this manuscript was supported, <strong>in</strong><br />
part, by National Institute <strong>of</strong> Mental Health grant K01<br />
MH734034-01, which has been awarded to <strong>the</strong> first author.<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors thank research assistant Kathleen Janel Sia for<br />
her aid with <strong>the</strong> literature review <strong>and</strong> formatt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
manuscript.<br />
References<br />
Bourdieu, P. (1986). <strong>The</strong> forms <strong>of</strong> capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), <strong>The</strong><br />
h<strong>and</strong>book <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>and</strong> research for <strong>the</strong> sociology <strong>of</strong> education (pp.<br />
241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, Inc.<br />
Corrigan, P. W. (2005). On <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>of</strong> mental illness: Practical strategies<br />
for research <strong>and</strong> social change. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, D.C.: American Psychological<br />
Association.<br />
Corrigan, P. W., Markowitz, F. E., & Watson, A. C. (2004). Structural levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> mental illness <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation. Schizophrenia Bullet<strong>in</strong>,<br />
30(3), 481–491.<br />
Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). <strong>The</strong> paradox <strong>of</strong> self-<strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
mental illness. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Psychology: Science <strong>and</strong> Practice, 9(1), 35–53.<br />
Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social <strong>stigma</strong>. In S. Fiske,<br />
D. Gilbert, & G. L<strong>in</strong>dzey (Eds.), H<strong>and</strong>book <strong>of</strong> social psychology (pp.<br />
504–553). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.<br />
Deng, R., Li, J., Sr<strong>in</strong>gernyuang, L., & Zhang, K. (2007). Drug abuse, HIV/AIDS<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tization <strong>in</strong> a Dai community <strong>in</strong> Yunnan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Social<br />
Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 64, 1560–1571.<br />
Edwards, A. (2007). Driven by an unselfish love. <strong>The</strong> Star Onl<strong>in</strong>e. Focus.<br />
Fei, X. (1992). From <strong>the</strong> soil: <strong>The</strong> foundations <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese society. Berkeley,<br />
CA: University <strong>of</strong> California Press.<br />
Furnham, A., & Chan, E. (2004). Lay <strong>the</strong>ories <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia: a crosscultural<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> British <strong>and</strong> Hong Kong Ch<strong>in</strong>ese attitudes,<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11<br />
attributions <strong>and</strong> beliefs. Social Psychiatry <strong>and</strong> Psychiatric Epidemiology,<br />
39, 543–552.<br />
G<strong>of</strong>fman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> spoiled identity.<br />
New York: Prentice Hall.<br />
Harpham, T., Grant, E., & Thomas, E. (2002). Measur<strong>in</strong>g social capital<br />
with<strong>in</strong> health surveys: key issues. Health Policy <strong>and</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g, 17(1),<br />
106–111.<br />
He, N., & Detels, R. (2005). <strong>The</strong> HIV epidemic <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: history, response,<br />
<strong>and</strong> challenge. Cell Research, 15(11–12), 825–832.<br />
Hesketh, T., Duo, L., Li, H., & Tomk<strong>in</strong>s, A. M. (2005). Attitudes to HIV <strong>and</strong><br />
HIV test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> high-prevalence areas <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> voluntary counsel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g programmes. Sexually<br />
Transmitted Infections, 81, 108–112.<br />
Hu, H. C. (1944). <strong>The</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese concept <strong>of</strong> ‘‘face’’. American Anthropologist,<br />
46(1), 45–64.<br />
Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face <strong>and</strong> favor: <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese power game. American<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Sociology, 92, 944–974.<br />
Jacobs, B. (1979). A prelim<strong>in</strong>ary model <strong>of</strong> particularistic ties <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
political alliances: Kan-ch’<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Kuan-hsi <strong>in</strong> a rural Taiwanese<br />
township. Ch<strong>in</strong>a Quarterly, 78, 237–273.<br />
J<strong>in</strong>g, J. (2006). Fear <strong>and</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>: an exploratory study <strong>of</strong> AIDS patient<br />
narratives <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. In J. Kaufman, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man, & T. Saich (Eds.),<br />
AIDS <strong>and</strong> social policy <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a (pp. 152–169). Cambridge, MA: Harvard<br />
University Press.<br />
Jones, E. E., Far<strong>in</strong>a, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., & Scott, R. A.<br />
(1984). Social <strong>stigma</strong>: <strong>The</strong> psychology <strong>of</strong> marked relationships. New<br />
York: Freeman.<br />
Kawachi, I., Kim, D., Coutts, A., & Subramanian, S. V. (2004). Commentary:<br />
reconcil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> three accounts <strong>of</strong> social capital. International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Epidemiology, 33, 682–690.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>g, A. Y. C. (1994). Kuan-hsi <strong>and</strong> network build<strong>in</strong>g: a sociological <strong>in</strong>terpretation.<br />
In W. M. Tu (Ed.), <strong>The</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g tree: <strong>The</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese today (pp. 109–126). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.<br />
Kipnis, A. B. (1997). Produc<strong>in</strong>g guanxi: Sentiment, self, <strong>and</strong> subculture <strong>in</strong><br />
a North Ch<strong>in</strong>a village. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.<br />
Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A. (1998). Experience <strong>and</strong> its moral modes: culture, human conditions,<br />
<strong>and</strong> disorder. In G. B. Peterson (Ed.), <strong>The</strong> Tanner lectures on human<br />
values (pp. 357–420). Salt Lake City: University <strong>of</strong> Utah Press.<br />
Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, J. (1991). Suffer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> its pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
transformation: toward an ethnography <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal experience.<br />
Culture, Medic<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> Psychiatry, 15(3), 275–301.<br />
Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A. M., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, J. (1993). Face, favor <strong>and</strong> families: <strong>the</strong> social<br />
course <strong>of</strong> mental health problems <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>and</strong> American societies.<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Journal <strong>of</strong> Mental Health, 6, 37–47.<br />
Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary orig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>tization:<br />
<strong>the</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> social exclusion. Psychological Bullet<strong>in</strong>, 127(2),<br />
187–208.<br />
Lau, D. C. (1984). Mencius. Hong Kong: Ch<strong>in</strong>ese University Press.<br />
Lau, J. T. F., & Tsui, H. Y. (2005). Discrim<strong>in</strong>atory attitudes towards people<br />
liv<strong>in</strong>g with HIV/AIDS <strong>and</strong> associated factors: a population-based<br />
study <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese general population. Sexually Transmitted Infections,<br />
81, 113–119.<br />
Lau, J. T. F., Tsui, H. Y., Li, C. K., Chung, W. Y., Chan, M. W., & Molassiotis, A.<br />
(2003). Needs assessment <strong>and</strong> social environment <strong>of</strong> people liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with HIV/AIDS <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong. AIDS Care, 15(5), 699–706.<br />
Lee, S. L., Chiu, M. Y. L., Tsang, A., Chui, H., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A. (2006). Stigmatiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
experience <strong>and</strong> structural discrim<strong>in</strong>ation associated with <strong>the</strong><br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong. Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
62, 1685–1696.<br />
Lee, S., Lee, M. T. Y., Chiu, M. Y. L., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A. (2005). Experience <strong>of</strong><br />
social <strong>stigma</strong> by people with schizophrenia <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong. British Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, 186, 153–157.<br />
Li, L., Wu, S., Wu, Z., Sun, S., Cui, H., & Jia, M. (2006). Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g family<br />
support for people liv<strong>in</strong>g with HIV/AIDS <strong>in</strong> Yunnan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. AIDS <strong>and</strong><br />
Behavior, 10(5), 509–517.<br />
Lieber, E., Li, L., Wu, Z., Ro<strong>the</strong>ram-Borus, M. J., & Guan, J. (2006). HIV/STD<br />
<strong>stigma</strong>tization fears as health seek<strong>in</strong>g barriers <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. AIDS <strong>and</strong><br />
Behavior, 10(5), 463–471.<br />
Lieber, E., Nihira, K., & M<strong>in</strong>k, I. T. (2004). Filial piety, modernization, <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> challenges <strong>of</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g children for Ch<strong>in</strong>ese immigrants: quantitative<br />
<strong>and</strong> qualitative evidence. Ethos, 32(3), 324–347.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>k, B. G., Cullen, F. T., Struen<strong>in</strong>g, E. L., Shrout, P. E., & Dohrenwend, B. P.<br />
(1989). A modified label<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ory approach <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> mental<br />
disorders: an empirical assessment. American Sociological Review,<br />
54, 100–123.<br />
Liu, H., Li, X., Stanton, B., Fang, X., Mao, R., & Chen, X., et al. (2005). Relation<br />
<strong>of</strong> sexual risks <strong>and</strong> prevention practices with <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ <strong>stigma</strong>tiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
beliefs towards HIV <strong>in</strong>fected <strong>in</strong>dividuals: an exploratory study.<br />
Sexually Transmitted Infections, 81, 511–516.<br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011
Mak, W. S., Mo, P. K. H., Cheung, R. Y. M., Woo, J., Cheung, F. M., & Lee, D.<br />
(2006). Comparative <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS, SARS, <strong>and</strong> tuberculosis <strong>in</strong><br />
Hong Kong. Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 63, 1912–1922.<br />
Mak, W. W. S., Cheung, R. Y. M., Law, R. W., Woo, J., Li, P. C. K., & Chung, R.<br />
W. Y. (2007). Exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g attribution model <strong>of</strong> self-<strong>stigma</strong> on social<br />
support <strong>and</strong> psychological well-be<strong>in</strong>g among people with HIVþ/<br />
AIDS. Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 64, 1549–1559.<br />
Marsella, A. J., & Choi, S. C. (1993). Psychosocial aspects <strong>of</strong> modernization <strong>and</strong><br />
economic development <strong>in</strong> East Asian nations. Psychologia, 36, 201–213.<br />
Mauss, M. (1967). <strong>The</strong> gift. New York: W.W. Norton.<br />
Parker, P., & Aggleton, P. (2003). HIV <strong>and</strong> AIDS-related <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
discrim<strong>in</strong>ation: a conceptual framework <strong>and</strong> implications for action.<br />
Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 57, 13–24.<br />
Pearson, V. (1995). Mental health care <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: State policies, pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
services <strong>and</strong> family responsibilities. London: Gaskell.<br />
Phillips, M. R. (1993). Strategies used by Ch<strong>in</strong>ese families cop<strong>in</strong>g with schizophrenia.<br />
In D. Davis, & S. Harrell (Eds.), Ch<strong>in</strong>ese families <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-Mao era<br />
(pp. 277–306). Los Angeles, CA: University <strong>of</strong> California Press.<br />
Phillips, M. R., & Gao, S. (1999). Report on <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
mentally ill <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir family members <strong>in</strong> urban Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Report to <strong>the</strong><br />
World Health Organization.<br />
Phillips, M. R., Pearson, V., Li, F., Xu, M., & Yang, L. H. (2002). Stigma <strong>and</strong><br />
expressed emotion: a study <strong>of</strong> people with schizophrenia <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
family members <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. British Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, 181, 488–<br />
493.<br />
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Mak<strong>in</strong>g democracy work: Civic traditions <strong>in</strong> modern<br />
Italy. Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton, NJ: Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton University Press.<br />
Sevigny, R., Weny<strong>in</strong>g, Y., Peiyan, Z., Marleau, J. D., Zhouyun, Y., & L<strong>in</strong>, S., et<br />
al. (1999). Attitudes toward <strong>the</strong> mentally ill <strong>in</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a psychiatric hospital <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g (Ch<strong>in</strong>a). International<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Psychiatry, 45(1), 41–55.<br />
Shan, H. (April 18, 2007). Breakthrough hoped for with new mental<br />
health law. Available from: Ch<strong>in</strong>a.org.cn.<br />
Stafford, C. (1995). <strong>The</strong> roads <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese childhood: Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> identification<br />
<strong>in</strong> Angang. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.<br />
Sun, L. K. (1987). Zhongguo Wenhuade Shenceng Jiegou. [<strong>The</strong> deep structure<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese culture]. Hong Kong: Ji Xian She.<br />
Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital,<br />
social <strong>the</strong>ory, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> political economy <strong>of</strong> public health. International<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology, 33, 1–18.<br />
Thornicr<strong>of</strong>t, G. (2006). Shunned: Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation aga<strong>in</strong>st people with mental<br />
illness. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />
Tsang, H. W. H., Angell, B., Corrigan, P. W., Lee, Y. T., Shi, K., & Lam, C. S., et<br />
al. (2007). A cross-cultural study <strong>of</strong> employers’ concerns about hir<strong>in</strong>g<br />
people with psychotic disorder: implications for recovery. Social<br />
Psychiatry <strong>and</strong> Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42, 723–733.<br />
ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />
L.H. Yang, A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man / Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e xxx (2008) 1–11 11<br />
Tu, W. M. (1987). Confucian humanism <strong>in</strong> a modern perspective. In J. P. L.<br />
Jiang (Ed.), Confucianism <strong>and</strong> modernization: A symposium. Taipei:<br />
Freedom Council.<br />
Walder, A. (1986). Communist Neo-traditionalism: Work <strong>and</strong> authority <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>in</strong>dustry. Berkeley: University <strong>of</strong> California Press.<br />
Wilk<strong>in</strong>son, R. (1996). Unhealthy societies: <strong>The</strong> afflictions <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>equality. London:<br />
Routledge.<br />
Wu, F. (2005). Elegy for luck: Suicide <strong>in</strong> a county <strong>of</strong> North Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Unpublished<br />
dissertation, Harvard University.<br />
Wu, Z., Kem<strong>in</strong>g, R., & Cui, H. (2004). <strong>The</strong> HIV/AIDS epidemic <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a:<br />
history, current strategies <strong>and</strong> future challenges. AIDS Education <strong>and</strong><br />
Prevention, 16, 7–17.<br />
Xiong, W., Phillips, M. R., Hu, X., Wang, R., Dai, Q., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, J., et al.<br />
(1994). Family-based <strong>in</strong>tervention for schizophrenic patients <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a: a r<strong>and</strong>omised controlled trial. British Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry,<br />
165, 239–247.<br />
Yan, Y. (1996). <strong>The</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> gifts: Reciprocity <strong>and</strong> social networks <strong>in</strong> a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
village. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.<br />
Yan, Y. (2003). Private life under socialism: Love, <strong>in</strong>timacy, <strong>and</strong> family<br />
change <strong>in</strong> a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese village (1949–1999). Stanford, CA: Stanford University<br />
Press.<br />
Yang, K. S. (1998). Ch<strong>in</strong>ese responses to modernization: a psychological<br />
analysis. Asian Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Psychology, 1, 75–97.<br />
Yang, L. H. (2003). Causal attributions, expressed emotion, <strong>and</strong> patient<br />
relapse: recent f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> application to Ch<strong>in</strong>ese societies. Hong<br />
Kong Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, 13(2), 16–25.<br />
Yang, L. H. (2007). Application <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory to Ch<strong>in</strong>ese groups with<br />
mental illness: syn<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>and</strong> new directions. S<strong>in</strong>gapore Medical Journal,<br />
48(11), 977–985.<br />
Yang, L. H., Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A., L<strong>in</strong>k, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Lee, S., & Good, B. (2007).<br />
Culture <strong>and</strong> <strong>stigma</strong>: add<strong>in</strong>g moral experience to <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory. Social<br />
Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 64(7), 1524–1535.<br />
Yang, L. S. (1957). <strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> ‘Pao’ as a basis for social relations <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a. In J. K. Fairbank (Ed.), Ch<strong>in</strong>ese thought <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions (pp.<br />
291–309). Chicago: University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press.<br />
Yang, M. M. H. (1994). Gifts, favors <strong>and</strong> banquets: <strong>The</strong> art <strong>of</strong> social relationships<br />
<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.<br />
Yang, Y., Zhang, K. L., Chan, K. Y., & Reidpath, D. D. (2005). Institutional<br />
<strong>and</strong> structural forms <strong>of</strong> HIV-related discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> health care:<br />
a study set <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g. AIDS Care, 17(Suppl. 2), S129–S140.<br />
Yip, W., Subramanian, S. V., Mitchell, A. D., Lee, D. S., Wang, J., &<br />
Kawachi, I. (2007). Does social capital enhance health <strong>and</strong> well-be<strong>in</strong>g?<br />
Evidence from rural Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 64(1),<br />
35–49.<br />
Zito, A. (1987). City gods, filiality <strong>and</strong> hegemony <strong>in</strong> late imperial Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Modern Ch<strong>in</strong>a, 13(3), 333–371.<br />
Please cite this article <strong>in</strong> press as: Lawrence Hs<strong>in</strong> Yang et al., ‘Face’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>embodiment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: <strong>The</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
<strong>and</strong> AIDS, Social Science & Medic<strong>in</strong>e (2008), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011