03.08.2013 Views

CDC History of Tuberculosis Control - Medical and Public Health ...

CDC History of Tuberculosis Control - Medical and Public Health ...

CDC History of Tuberculosis Control - Medical and Public Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

disease to health care workers caring for the<br />

patients involved in these outbreaks.<br />

With recognition <strong>of</strong> the increased risk for TB<br />

among persons with HIV infection, in 1990<br />

<strong>CDC</strong> issued Guidelines for Preventing the<br />

Transmission <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tuberculosis</strong> in <strong>Health</strong>-Care<br />

Settings with Special Focus on HIV-Related<br />

Issues. Despite these guidelines,<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> appropriate infection<br />

control measures was incomplete in many<br />

hospitals, <strong>and</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the published reports <strong>of</strong><br />

nosocomial transmission documented lapses in<br />

or absence <strong>of</strong> infection control measures in the<br />

health care facilities. Because <strong>of</strong> its legal<br />

m<strong>and</strong>ate to ensure that no worker is harmed<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> his or her work experience, as<br />

well as the outbreaks <strong>of</strong> MDR TB, in 1992 the<br />

National Institute for Occupational Safety <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Health</strong> (NIOSH) recommended the use <strong>of</strong><br />

powered-air purifying respirators (PAPRs) by<br />

health care workers potentially exposed to<br />

M. tuberculosis.<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> the ongoing outbreaks <strong>of</strong> TB <strong>and</strong><br />

the NIOSH recommendation for the use <strong>of</strong><br />

PAPRs, the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the 1990 guidelines<br />

was discussed at a large national meeting<br />

convened in 1993. In attendance at this<br />

meeting were representatives from multiple<br />

groups concerned with nosocomial<br />

transmission <strong>of</strong> M. tuberculosis, including<br />

infection control practitioners, labor<br />

representatives, <strong>and</strong> occupational medicine<br />

practitioners. The meeting concluded that in<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the outbreak settings, the 1990<br />

guidelines had not been adequately<br />

implemented, <strong>and</strong> there was a need for revised<br />

<strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ed guidelines. In 1993 a draft <strong>of</strong> the<br />

revised guidelines was published in the Federal<br />

Register for public comment. After a period <strong>of</strong><br />

comment <strong>and</strong> public meetings, the report<br />

Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission <strong>of</strong><br />

Mycobacterium tuberculosis in <strong>Health</strong>-Care<br />

Facilities, 1994 was published in the Morbidity<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mortality Weekly Report. This document<br />

contained detailed, comprehensive<br />

recommendations for prevention <strong>of</strong><br />

Notable Events in TB <strong>Control</strong><br />

61<br />

Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> TB <strong>Control</strong> Measures<br />

I. Source <strong>Control</strong><br />

(most effective, efficient)<br />

II. Environmental<br />

<strong>Control</strong><br />

III. Protective devices<br />

for workers (least<br />

effective, efficient)<br />

nosocomial transmission <strong>of</strong> M. tuberculosis.<br />

Included in the recommendations was a<br />

hierarchy <strong>of</strong> controls composed <strong>of</strong>, most<br />

importantly, administrative controls<br />

(including assignment <strong>of</strong> responsibility, risk<br />

assessment, development <strong>of</strong> a TB infection<br />

control plan with periodic reassessment, <strong>and</strong><br />

tuberculin skin testing <strong>of</strong> health care workers),<br />

followed by engineering controls, <strong>and</strong> then by<br />

personal respiratory protection. Personal<br />

respiratory protection devices that were<br />

recommended for use in the health care setting<br />

needed to meet the following criteria:<br />

1) ability to filter particles <strong>of</strong> 1 micron with a<br />

filter efficiency <strong>of</strong> 95%, 2) ability to be fit<br />

tested to obtain a face seal leak <strong>of</strong> 10% or less,<br />

3) ability to fit different face sizes, <strong>and</strong><br />

4) ability to be checked for face-piece fit by<br />

health care workers each time the respirator<br />

was used. At the time the 1994 guidelines were<br />

written, the only respiratory protection device<br />

that was NIOSH-approved <strong>and</strong> met the above<br />

criteria was the high efficiency particulate air<br />

(HEPA) filter respirators. In July 1995<br />

NIOSH updated its respirator testing <strong>and</strong><br />

certification requirements to permit the<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> other respirators. Under the<br />

updated testing, respirators that contain a<br />

NIOSH-certified N-series filter with 95%<br />

efficiency (N-95) rating meet the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>CDC</strong> guidelines.<br />

Like NIOSH, the Occupational Safety <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Health</strong> Administration (OSHA) has a legal<br />

m<strong>and</strong>ate for the protection <strong>of</strong> workers;<br />

however, unlike NIOSH, which can only

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!