CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec
CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec
CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Type of Violation a<br />
Crimes Without ConsequenCes<br />
Violation # Records<br />
Failure to provide water in pen 24<br />
Pens or grounds in disrepair 14<br />
Ineffective stunning 10<br />
Improper ritual slaughter 6<br />
Failure to provide feed in pen 5<br />
Conscious animal on bleed rail 3<br />
Excessive force used to drive animals 3<br />
Improper handling of disabled animal 3<br />
Inadequate space in pens for lying 1<br />
Not specified 1<br />
Violations per Establishment<br />
# NRs # Establishments<br />
1 Record 23<br />
2 Records 9<br />
3 Records 1<br />
4 Records 1<br />
5 Records 0<br />
6 Records 2<br />
Notes<br />
a Multiple possible<br />
The above table summarizes the information contained in the NRs provided by state<br />
departments of agriculture for the period January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2004.<br />
The data for type of violation and number of violations per establishment were similar<br />
to those reported for federal inspected slaughter plants during the same period (see<br />
Section 5.1). However, the reporting of incidents by animal species differed between<br />
state and federal enforcement records. Cattle and pigs were reported to be involved in an<br />
approximately equal number of state humane slaughter incidents, while more cattle than<br />
pigs were involved in federal incidents.<br />
74
Change language