03.08.2013 Views

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

enforCement of state laWs<br />

penalty of $500 (fine was stayed). In another case involving the use of an ax to stun a<br />

pig, Minnesota sought criminal prosecution under the state humane slaughter law. The<br />

establishment owner pled guilty and was fined $1,000 and placed on probation for a<br />

period of one year. (This was the only instance of criminal prosecution for inhumane<br />

slaughter identified in the United States for the period 2002 through 2004.) In this case<br />

the violation occurred at a custom slaughter establishment and was observed and reported<br />

by a customer, as described below:<br />

On July 16, 2004, the Dairy, Food and Meat Inspection Division of the Minnesota<br />

Department of Agriculture received a telephone call from [names withheld]. [Names<br />

withheld] were calling regarding a pig they purchased from Jeffries Chicken Farm in<br />

Inver Grove Heights. [Names withheld] reported that they wanted to discuss the manner<br />

in which the pig they purchased had been handled prior to slaughter. [Name withheld]<br />

reported that he observed an employee … repeatedly hit the pig they selected over the<br />

head with an axe. They reported that the first blow landed above the pig’s eye, causing<br />

the pig to fall to the ground. They reported that the pig then staggered to his feet and<br />

appeared disoriented and squealed loudly. They reported that [employee] hit the pig in<br />

the same manner 5-6 times, yielding the same reaction from the pig. [Name withheld]<br />

and other family members requested that the hitting stop. [Name withheld] reported that<br />

[the employee] then dragged the pig across the floor, closer to the drain, and slit the<br />

pig’s throat. [Name withheld] reported that the owner of the Jeffries Chicken Farm, John<br />

Jeffries, was present during the entire slaughter process and observed [employee] hitting<br />

the pig. During this time, John Jeffries was observed to slaughter another pig in the same<br />

manner. [Names withheld] reported that they had been at the Jeffries Chicken Farm on<br />

other occasions and observed other animals treated in the same manner. 212<br />

Animals Involved a<br />

Table 23. Summary of State NRs<br />

2002 to 2004<br />

Species # Records<br />

Cattle, calves 19<br />

Hogs, pigs 20<br />

Sheep, goats 5<br />

Rabbits 4<br />

Bison 2<br />

Poultry 2<br />

Not specified 13<br />

212 State of Minnesota (City of Inver Grove Heights) vs. Lee Wayne Pilgrim, Complaint (Exhibit A).<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!