CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec
CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec
CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Crimes Without ConsequenCes<br />
enforcement rates. District 5 (Alameda, Calif.), with only 32 slaughter plants, issued 15<br />
suspensions from January 1998 through September 2007, while District 60 (Philadelphia,<br />
Penn.), with 139 plants, issued just four during the same period. In some cases, district<br />
offices issued suspensions to plants for failure to provide water to animals in pens, while<br />
in other instances districts failed to take action for repeated instances of ineffective<br />
stunning and/or conscious animals on the bleed rail.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tyson Fresh Meat plant in Geneseo, Ill. received 10 NRs between December<br />
2002 and December 2003 without issuance of a suspension.<br />
Nebraska Beef plant in Omaha, Neb. received 12 NRs in a six-month period<br />
(between December 2004 and May 2005) without issuance of a suspension.<br />
Shapiro Packing plant in Augusta, Ga. received seven NRs between October<br />
2002 and August 2003 without issuance of a suspension.<br />
The GAO voiced a similar criticism in its 2004 report on federal humane slaughter<br />
enforcement:<br />
Our analysis of the 553 noncompliance records indicated that the severity and<br />
repetitiveness of the violations does not necessarily result in consistent enforcement<br />
actions by district managers. For example, in one case, inspectors had prepared 16<br />
noncompliance records, all related to the ineffective stunning of animals. However,<br />
the district manager did not take enforcement action because, as he explained, the 16<br />
incidents were not triggered by the same factor; if they had been, he said he would have<br />
suspended the plant. This contrasts with the opinion of another district manager who,<br />
commenting on this same situation, said that a case of so many related and relatively<br />
serious incidents is a definite candidate for a suspension. 164<br />
The GAO recommended that the FSIS “establish additional clear, specific, and consistent<br />
criteria for district offices to use when considering whether to take enforcement actions<br />
because of repetitive violations.” Without such criteria, the GAO noted, “enforcement<br />
decisions are likely to be inconsistent across FSIS districts, undermining FSIS’ efforts to<br />
effectively enforce the act.” 165<br />
164 U.S. GAO, Humane Methods of Slaughter Act: USDA has addressed some problems but still faces<br />
enforcement challenges, GAO-04-247, January 2004, p. 25.<br />
165 Ibid.<br />
56