03.08.2013 Views

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Crimes Without ConsequenCes<br />

enforcement rates. District 5 (Alameda, Calif.), with only 32 slaughter plants, issued 15<br />

suspensions from January 1998 through September 2007, while District 60 (Philadelphia,<br />

Penn.), with 139 plants, issued just four during the same period. In some cases, district<br />

offices issued suspensions to plants for failure to provide water to animals in pens, while<br />

in other instances districts failed to take action for repeated instances of ineffective<br />

stunning and/or conscious animals on the bleed rail.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Tyson Fresh Meat plant in Geneseo, Ill. received 10 NRs between December<br />

2002 and December 2003 without issuance of a suspension.<br />

Nebraska Beef plant in Omaha, Neb. received 12 NRs in a six-month period<br />

(between December 2004 and May 2005) without issuance of a suspension.<br />

Shapiro Packing plant in Augusta, Ga. received seven NRs between October<br />

2002 and August 2003 without issuance of a suspension.<br />

The GAO voiced a similar criticism in its 2004 report on federal humane slaughter<br />

enforcement:<br />

Our analysis of the 553 noncompliance records indicated that the severity and<br />

repetitiveness of the violations does not necessarily result in consistent enforcement<br />

actions by district managers. For example, in one case, inspectors had prepared 16<br />

noncompliance records, all related to the ineffective stunning of animals. However,<br />

the district manager did not take enforcement action because, as he explained, the 16<br />

incidents were not triggered by the same factor; if they had been, he said he would have<br />

suspended the plant. This contrasts with the opinion of another district manager who,<br />

commenting on this same situation, said that a case of so many related and relatively<br />

serious incidents is a definite candidate for a suspension. 164<br />

The GAO recommended that the FSIS “establish additional clear, specific, and consistent<br />

criteria for district offices to use when considering whether to take enforcement actions<br />

because of repetitive violations.” Without such criteria, the GAO noted, “enforcement<br />

decisions are likely to be inconsistent across FSIS districts, undermining FSIS’ efforts to<br />

effectively enforce the act.” 165<br />

164 U.S. GAO, Humane Methods of Slaughter Act: USDA has addressed some problems but still faces<br />

enforcement challenges, GAO-04-247, January 2004, p. 25.<br />

165 Ibid.<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!