03.08.2013 Views

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

•<br />

•<br />

Crimes Without ConsequenCes<br />

were numerous hogs trying to rest on top of other hogs due to lack of space. I<br />

observed firsthand the extreme vocalization of hogs positioned on the bottom as<br />

other hogs tried to rest and walk on top of them. 137<br />

It was observed that there was insufficient room in several of the holding pens<br />

for the animals to lie down overnight. For instance, there were 37 head of<br />

cattle in the test pen and 34 animals in pens 17 and 18. Less than 10% of these<br />

animals had sufficient room to lie down and the rest had to remain standing. 138<br />

Four cows were down in this pen. There was not sufficient room for them to get<br />

up once they were down. Once the pen was emptied two got up immediately.<br />

The other two had considerable bruising and trauma from being down in a pen<br />

tightly packed with cattle. 139<br />

Humane driving of animals<br />

Federal regulations state, “Driving of livestock from the unloading ramp to the holding<br />

pens and from the holding pens to the stunning area shall be done with a minimum of<br />

excitement and discomfort to the animals.” 140 Regulations also prohibit “excessive” use<br />

of electric prods, canvas slappers or other implements, as determined by FSIS inspection<br />

personnel. 141 Following are examples from federal NRs of failure to drive animals in a<br />

humane manner:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

I observed [a] slaughter employee prodding the animal with the sharp end of a<br />

pitchfork. I immediately told him to “drop the pitchfork” which he did and he<br />

picked up a hot shot [electric prod] that he had been using, which apparently<br />

was not functioning. 142<br />

At approximately 0815 a hog escaped from the pen onto the kill floor. A company<br />

employee picked up a metal pipe and began striking the hog on the head. The<br />

employee was instructed to stop striking the hog, which he did. 143<br />

The inspector observed the plant employee located immediately prior to the<br />

cattle entering the restrainer using the electric prod (hot shot) on every animal<br />

as they passed by her. After the inspector was aware that consecutive animals<br />

were being prodded when there was no indication of balking, a count was begun<br />

and reached 7 animals when said employee became aware that she was being<br />

observed. 144<br />

I observed hog yard foreman violently beating on the hogs in the pen with a<br />

slapper paddle. Over the 2-3 minute period I observed [him] using one arm<br />

and two arms on the slapper paddle beating the hogs. The hogs became over<br />

137 NR issued to plant #00003SM on December 8, 2003.<br />

138 NR issued to plant #00562MM on December 16, 2003.<br />

139 NR issued to plant #00477M on November 16, 2002.<br />

140 9 CFR 313.2(a).<br />

141 9 CFR 313.2(b).<br />

142 NR issued to plant #02439 on March 10, 2004.<br />

143 NR issued to plant #11159M on October 15, 2003.<br />

144 NR issued to plant #00278M on October 7, 2003.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!