03.08.2013 Views

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

enforCement of federal laW in u.s. Plants<br />

An analysis of the 432 NRs supplied by the FSIS revealed a total of 501 humane<br />

handling or humane slaughter violations at 229 plants. 102 The types of violations cited<br />

are summarized in Table 11. Although most records documented only one violation, in<br />

some cases multiple violations were noted. Moreover, nearly 40 percent of the NRs noted<br />

multiple instances of a violation.<br />

Water in pens<br />

The most commonly cited humane handling and slaughter deficiency at federally<br />

inspected slaughter facilities was the failure to provide water to animals in holding areas.<br />

Federal regulations state: “Animals shall have access to water in all holding pens and, if<br />

held longer than 24 hours, access to feed.” 103 Following are examples from federal NRs<br />

of failure to provide access to water:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Out of 22 bison and 1 beef steer, the steer and nine of the bison were without<br />

water and had no access to water. The bison had a barrel that had been cut in<br />

half for water. This barrel was covered with fecal material and slime and held a<br />

slight amount of green, slimy water. 104<br />

I noted that one of the bulls, deemed by the establishment as too large to<br />

slaughter at this facility, was lying dead in Pen 14. There were several other<br />

large bulls also in the pen. The dead bull’s eyes were sunken suggesting<br />

dehydration, and upon closer inspection, the waterer supplying water to Pens<br />

14 and 13 was found to be empty. These bulls had been held on establishment’s<br />

premises since 10/03/03. 105<br />

One pen holding animals had no water tank, one water tank in another pen was<br />

dry, and several water tanks in other pens were frozen over so animals had no<br />

access to water. 106<br />

Pens or grounds in good repair<br />

The second most commonly cited humane handling and slaughter deficiency was the<br />

failure to maintain facilities in good repair. Federal regulations state, “Livestock pens,<br />

driveways and ramps shall be maintained in good repair. They shall be free from sharp<br />

or protruding objects that may, in the opinion of the inspector, cause injury or pain to the<br />

animals. Loose boards, splintered or broken planking, and unnecessary openings where<br />

the head, feet, or legs of an animal may be injured shall be repaired.” 107 Following are<br />

examples of failure to maintain pens and other facilities in good repair:<br />

102 A list of all federal plants cited for humane violations, October 1, 2002 to March 31, 2004, is presented in<br />

Appendix E.<br />

103 9 CFR 313.2(e).<br />

104 NR issued to plant #11032M on March 10, 2004.<br />

105 NR issued to plant #00532M on October 7, 2003.<br />

106 NR issued to plant #17466M on November 12, 2003.<br />

107 9 CFR 313.1(a).<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!