CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec
CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec
CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
history of u.s. humane slaughter initiatives<br />
The USDA-FSIS announces implementation of a new electronic<br />
tracking system, Humane Activities Tracking (HAT), to document<br />
inspection activities that monitor compliance with humane handling<br />
and slaughter regulations at federally inspected plants. 59<br />
In its FY2005 appropriations act, Congress directs that no less than 63<br />
full-time equivalents (FTEs) be devoted to humane enforcement, and<br />
approves an appropriation of $3 million to incorporate the agency’s<br />
HAT system into its field computer systems. 60 Use of the term “FTE”<br />
in both FY2003 and FY2005 permits the USDA to distribute humane<br />
slaughter law enforcement among existing staff, rather than hire new<br />
staff with the sole responsibility of enforcing humane handling and<br />
slaughter requirements.<br />
2005 The World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) approves<br />
international guidelines for the welfare of food animals during preslaughter<br />
and slaughter processes. 61<br />
Congress provides $4 million for the FSIS to complete incorporation<br />
of the HAT system into all U.S. slaughter plants. In addition, the<br />
Senate committee report of FY2006 appropriations bill states that its<br />
appropriation provides funding to maintain the 63 FTEs added by<br />
FY2005 spending bill. 62<br />
During annual appropriations process, the Senate approves ban on the<br />
slaughter of non-ambulatory animals, including sheep, pigs, goats,<br />
horses, mules and other equine, for human consumption. House fails<br />
to back ban, and measure is dropped from final law by congressional<br />
conference committee. 63<br />
A lawsuit is filed against the USDA on behalf of HSUS and specified<br />
individuals challenging the USDA’s decision to exclude birds from<br />
coverage under the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act. 64<br />
59 USDA-FSIS, FSIS unveils new Humane Activities Tracking System (news release), February 2, 2004. (http://<br />
fsis.usda.gov/News_&_Events/2004_News_Releases/index.asp)<br />
60 P.L. 108-447.<br />
61 World Organization for Animal Health, Guidelines for the slaughter of animals, Terrestrial Animal Health<br />
Code, Appendix 3.7.5, 2006.<br />
62 P.L. 109-97. See also also Becker G, Meat and poultry inspection: background and selected issues,<br />
Congressional Research Service, December 12, 2005.<br />
63 Becker G, Meat and poultry inspection: background and selected issues, Congressional Research Service,<br />
December 12, 2005.<br />
64 Humane Society of the United States, The HSUS files lawsuit challenging USDA’s exclusion of birds from<br />
the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act (news release), November 21, 2005. (http://www.hsus.org/press_and_<br />
publications/press_releases/the_hsus_files_lawsuit_Challenging _USDAs _Exclusion.html)<br />
27