03.08.2013 Views

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

history of u.s. humane slaughter initiatives<br />

1996 Dr. Temple Grandin conducts an audit of 24 federal slaughter plants<br />

in 10 states for the USDA. She finds only 30 percent of plants able to<br />

effectively stun 95 percent or more of cattle with one shot of captive<br />

bolt gun, as required by federal humane slaughter law. 32<br />

1997 USDA Technical Services Center staff conducts an audit of humane<br />

slaughter and ante-mortem inspection procedures at 61 federal livestock<br />

slaughter plants. It finds incidents of inhumane handling at 21 percent<br />

of the plants and excessive time between stunning and bleeding at 56<br />

percent of plants. 33<br />

A judge in trial of London activists for libeling McDonald’s<br />

Corporation finds the fast food giant “culpably responsible for cruel<br />

practices in the rearing and slaughter of some of the animals which are<br />

used to produce [its] food.” The judge finds that some chickens endure<br />

rough handling before slaughter and have their throats cut while still<br />

conscious. 34<br />

Slaughterhouse: The Shocking Story of Greed, Neglect, and Inhumane<br />

Treatment Inside the U.S. Meat Industry, by humane investigator Gail<br />

Eisnitz, is published.<br />

1998 The USDA begins a 2-year phase-in of a new food safety monitoring<br />

program, Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP). Under<br />

HACCP, the slaughter industry is given increased authority for selfoversight<br />

and procedural code for tracking humane slaughter violations<br />

is eliminated. 35<br />

Current and former USDA food safety inspectors testify at a news<br />

conference that slaughterhouses routinely ignore humane slaughter law<br />

and butcher still-conscious animals to keep production lines moving. 36<br />

Representative George E. Brown, Jr. (D-CA), sponsor of 1978<br />

legislation to strengthen enforcement of Humane Methods of Slaughter<br />

Act, sends a letter to then-USDA Secretary Dan Glickman, urging<br />

him to “take whatever actions are necessary to ensure the prompt and<br />

effective enforcement” of the law. 37<br />

32 Grandin T, Survey of stunning and handling in Federally inspected beef, veal, pork, and sheep slaughter<br />

plants, 1997. (http://www.grandin.com/survey/usdarpt.html)<br />

33 USDA-FSIS, Special survey on humane slaughter and ante-mortem inspection, March 1998. (http://www.fsis.<br />

usda.gov/oa/pubs/antemort.pdf)<br />

34 The “McLibel” verdict, which was issued in June 1997, can be accessed at http://www.mcspotlight.org/case/<br />

trial/verdict/summary.html.<br />

35 USDA-FSIS, Pathogen reduction; hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) systems; final rule,<br />

Federal Register [, Vol. 61, No. 144, July 25, 1996, pp. 38805-38855.<br />

36 Vorman J, USDA inspector claims cattle, pigs often brutalized, Reuters, April 2, 1998.<br />

37 Krizner K, Congressman demands enforcement of humane slaughter legislation, Daily News, April 14, 1998.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!