03.08.2013 Views

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES - gpvec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

exeCutive summary<br />

Federal enforcement at foreign slaughterhouses<br />

Approximately three dozen countries are eligible to export meat to the United States.<br />

The USDA is expected to ensure that the meat inspection system of a foreign country is<br />

equivalent to U.S. domestic meat inspection, including in the area of humane handling<br />

and slaughter. However, Jones found that the USDA does not routinely consider humane<br />

slaughter laws and their enforcement in reviewing foreign country eligibility, and in<br />

inspecting foreign slaughter plants, the agency cites almost no humane deficiencies.<br />

The USDA explains this finding by noting that there is a “high level of compliance in<br />

foreign plants.” But it seems unlikely that foreign slaughter plants would excel at humane<br />

slaughter when many are found to be wanting in nearly every other area.<br />

State enforcement at U.S. slaughterhouses<br />

Twenty-nine states operate meat inspection programs, and nine of these have the<br />

authority to administer humane slaughter laws at federal as well as state-inspected<br />

slaughterhouses. However, most states running meat inspection programs were not able to<br />

provide any documents related to humane slaughter enforcement for a recent three-year<br />

period. The states with no records of humane enforcement are responsible for overseeing<br />

animal handling and slaughter at a total of 600 slaughter plants.<br />

Of the 30 states accredited to administer humane slaughter programs at the time of the<br />

review (one state—New Mexico—has since lost its accreditation), 20 could provide no<br />

humane enforcement records for the period 2002 through 2004:<br />

Alabama Iowa South Dakota<br />

Arizona Louisiana Utah<br />

Colorado Maine Vermont<br />

Delaware* Mississippi Virginia<br />

Georgia Missouri West Virginia<br />

Illinois Montana Wyoming<br />

Indiana New Mexico (* No state-inspected plants at the time)<br />

Four states issued at least one deficiency record, but took no further actions during the<br />

period:<br />

North Carolina Oklahoma<br />

North Dakota Texas<br />

Six states took an action for inhumane slaughter beyond issuance of a deficiency record:<br />

California Ohio<br />

Kansas South Carolina<br />

Minnesota Wisconsin<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!