Changing MIC Breakpoints: Do Mechanisms Count

Changing MIC Breakpoints: Do Mechanisms Count Changing MIC Breakpoints: Do Mechanisms Count

conference.cast.com
from conference.cast.com More from this publisher
03.08.2013 Views

CLSI Acceptable Limits ( g/mL) for QC Strains Used to Monitor Accuracy Antimicrobial E. Coli ATCC 25922 No. of Doubling Dilutions Allowed Cefazolin 1-4 3 Cefotaxime 0.03-0.12 3 Ceftriaxone 0.03-0.12 3 Ceftazidime 0.06-0.5 4 Aztreonam 0.06-0.25 3 Cefepime 0.015-0.12 8 CLSI M100-S20. Table 4 24

MIC Reproducibility • In this imperfect reality an ESBL producer with a cefotaxime MIC of 1 g/mL (probably responsive to cefotaxime in vivo) cannot be reliably distinguished from one with an MIC of 4 g/mL (probably not responsive) and it is simpler and safer to follow the precautionary approach of seeking the ESBL and, if found, reporting the isolate as resistant - David Livermore, 20 th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Vienna, Austria, 10-13 April, 2010. 25

CLSI Acceptable Limits ( g/mL) for QC<br />

Strains Used to Monitor Accuracy<br />

Antimicrobial E. Coli ATCC 25922 No. of <strong>Do</strong>ubling<br />

Dilutions Allowed<br />

Cefazolin 1-4 3<br />

Cefotaxime 0.03-0.12 3<br />

Ceftriaxone 0.03-0.12 3<br />

Ceftazidime 0.06-0.5 4<br />

Aztreonam 0.06-0.25 3<br />

Cefepime 0.015-0.12 8<br />

CLSI M100-S20. Table 4<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!