1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...
1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...
1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3) Henry <strong>Bradford</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Muster<br />
Perhaps <strong>Nathaniel</strong> or the above Henry <strong>Bradford</strong> are related to the Henery <strong>Bradford</strong> who appears aged 35 in<br />
the 1625 muster roll <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Virginia</strong> Company as a servant <strong>of</strong> Capt. William Pierce, transported in the<br />
Abigaile along with fellow servant Thomas Smith, who was 17. Henry <strong>of</strong> the muster died in 1628, so he is<br />
not the same Henry <strong>Bradford</strong> who appears in <strong>Accomack</strong>; but he may have been the latter Henry’s father, or<br />
related in some other way. And what <strong>of</strong> Henery’s fellow servant Thomas Smith? Is this Smith related to<br />
<strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s step-father Richard Smith? Is he perhaps the same person as the Capt. Thomas Smith<br />
mentioned in the other Henry <strong>Bradford</strong>’s 1672 note? If not, are the two Thomas Smiths related? A serious<br />
attempt should be made to find the parents <strong>of</strong> Henry <strong>Bradford</strong> <strong>of</strong> the muster and whether he had any<br />
children. The inventory <strong>of</strong> his goods was presented to the court at James City by Ester Clariett, so research<br />
might be attempted on her as well as Henery’s master William Pierce and fellow servant Thomas Smith to<br />
see if any clues present themselves.<br />
4) Other <strong>Bradford</strong>s in 17 th Century <strong>Virginia</strong><br />
Several other <strong>Bradford</strong>s are known to have emigrated to <strong>Virginia</strong> in the 17 th century.<br />
• The records <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Virginia</strong> Company <strong>of</strong> London mention a James <strong>Bradford</strong>, transported by<br />
Garret Weston. [Court record <strong>of</strong> 26 April 1624; Vol. II, p.532.]<br />
• A John <strong>Bradford</strong> was among the list <strong>of</strong> those massacred on 22 March 1622 at George Yeardley’s<br />
plantation in Flowerdieu Hundred. [Records <strong>of</strong> the VA Company, 26 April 1624; Vol. III, p.568.]<br />
o A John <strong>Bradford</strong> is mentioned as transported aboard the Temperance in 1621 by Sir<br />
George Yeardley [Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Council & General Court <strong>of</strong> Colonial <strong>Virginia</strong>; 9<br />
February 1627.] He is likely the one killed in the massacre.<br />
• In Cavaliers and Pioneers, several <strong>Bradford</strong>s other than <strong>Nathaniel</strong> are listed. The Richard<br />
<strong>Bradford</strong> transported by Roger Walker or Walters in 1653/4 went to live in Charles City <strong>County</strong><br />
and is well documented. DNA evidence suggests he might have shared a <strong>Bradford</strong> ancestor with<br />
<strong>Nathaniel</strong>. [See below.]<br />
• A John <strong>Bradford</strong> was listed as a headright <strong>of</strong> Lt. Thomas Flint from 1628. The land granted Flint<br />
was near land granted to William Pierce, who was the master <strong>of</strong> Henry <strong>Bradford</strong>, above.<br />
• A Thomas <strong>Bradford</strong> was a headright <strong>of</strong> Robert Holt, merchant on a patent from 1640.<br />
• A Susan <strong>Bradford</strong> was a headright <strong>of</strong> Sir Francis Wyatt on a patent from 1643.<br />
• A Nicho. <strong>Bradford</strong> was a headright <strong>of</strong> John Broach on a patent from 1647.<br />
• An Edy <strong>Bradford</strong> was a headright <strong>of</strong> Ephraditus Lawson on a patent from 1650.<br />
• A John <strong>Bradford</strong> was a headright <strong>of</strong> Augustine Warner on a patent from 1652.<br />
• A Mathew <strong>Bradford</strong> was a headright <strong>of</strong> Peter Knight on a patent from 1652.<br />
• A Sarah <strong>Bradford</strong> was a headright <strong>of</strong> John Hughlett on a patent from 1662.<br />
• A John <strong>Bradford</strong> was a headright <strong>of</strong> John Edwards on a patent from 1663.<br />
4) <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>of</strong> Barbados<br />
A <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> was transported to Barbados from England at age 19 on 27 April 1635 [Hotten]. This<br />
<strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s birth would have been around the year 1616, so he is the right age to have been the father <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Accomack</strong>. It is also possible this <strong>Nathaniel</strong> is identical to <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Accomack</strong>, although<br />
that would mean that the latter’s marriage to Alice Smith, which we presume to be his first, took place<br />
when he was in his early 40s - not unheard <strong>of</strong>. A search <strong>of</strong> abstracts <strong>of</strong> the records <strong>of</strong> Barbardos reveals the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> a few <strong>Bradford</strong>s resident there before 1660, but none <strong>of</strong> them named <strong>Nathaniel</strong>. Although at<br />
first glance Barbados would seem too far away to be a likely point <strong>of</strong> recent origin, the entire Englishspeaking<br />
world was much more intimately connected than one might at first suppose. A significant amount<br />
<strong>of</strong> trade and even migration went back and forth between <strong>Virginia</strong> and other English colonies, especially<br />
Barbados.<br />
5) Was Richard Smith the stepfather <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>?<br />
Notwithstanding the conclusion in Adventures <strong>of</strong> Purse and Person, there is scant reason to suspect that<br />
Richard Smith married <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s mother, so to my mind Richard’s family is not a particularly fruitful<br />
area <strong>of</strong> research for finding <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s origins. That being said, those interested in pursuing this line <strong>of</strong><br />
inquiry should collect all the material available on Richard from Northampton <strong>County</strong> records and from the<br />
records <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Virginia</strong> Company.<br />
Page 73 <strong>of</strong> 74 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>