1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...
1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...
1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Citations<br />
Introduction<br />
<strong>1.</strong><strong>Nathaniel</strong> must have been at least 21 years <strong>of</strong> age when he posted a bond for Ann West Charlton’s<br />
appeal to the court at James City in September 21, 1658 [See note 24]. That gives an absolute upper limit <strong>of</strong><br />
1637 for the year <strong>of</strong> his birth. However, he was probably born before 1633, since he was most likely at least<br />
21 when he witnessed Stephen Charlton’s deed <strong>of</strong> gift to his daughter Elizabeth in October 1654 [See note<br />
22].<br />
2.JoAnn Riley McKey, <strong>Accomack</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Virginia</strong> Court Order Abstracts, Electronic Edition (Bowie,<br />
Maryland: Heritage Books, Inc., 2001); 7: 22. All tithables are supposed to have been collected by June 10.<br />
1690.<br />
3.McKey, 8: 4<br />
4.James Handley Marshall, compiler, Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the Wills and Administrations <strong>of</strong> Northampton<br />
<strong>County</strong>, <strong>Virginia</strong> 1632-1802 (Rockport, Maine: Picton Press, 1994), 60. [N.B. – see page 8 for a discussion<br />
<strong>of</strong> a competing theory that has <strong>Nathaniel</strong> married to Alice after the date <strong>of</strong> Richard Smith’s will.]<br />
5.Marshall, 67<br />
6.See William R. M. Houston & Jean M. Mihalyka, Colonial Residents <strong>of</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong>’s Eastern Shore<br />
(Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1985). William’s age was listed as 50 in August 1713 (A 8: 603).<br />
This probably comes from a deposition, but I have yet to check the original record. An independent<br />
estimate arrived at by assuming an age <strong>of</strong> 21 at his appointment as a surveyor in Sussex Co.,<br />
Delaware/Pennsylvania in 1683 yields a birth year <strong>of</strong> 1662, so a birth year <strong>of</strong> around 1662/1663 seems<br />
broadly accurate, especially given that his older brother was probably born in 1660 or 166<strong>1.</strong><br />
7.McKey, 1: 95<br />
8.That Joan’s marriage to <strong>Nathaniel</strong> occurred in 1677 or before is deduced from the probable birth year<br />
<strong>of</strong> their son John and is arrived at by assuming that Joan gave birth to John after her marriage to <strong>Nathaniel</strong>.<br />
For evidence <strong>of</strong> John <strong>Bradford</strong>’s birth year, see McKey, 8: 66 (19 Feb 1691/92 court), where it is recorded<br />
that John chose Thomas Budd as his guardian. Children were allowed to choose their guardians upon<br />
arriving at the age <strong>of</strong> 15, so 1677 should be a reliable upper limit to the possible range <strong>of</strong> years in which<br />
John was born. See also McKey, 9: 38 (8 Oct 1698 court), where John’s release to his brother William for<br />
the lands at <strong>Bradford</strong>’s Neck is noted. To sign a legal instrument, one had to be at least 21, which again<br />
gives 1677 as a reliable limit to John’s probable birth year. If it is certain that John was not born after 1677,<br />
his release to William hints that he was probably not born much before 1677. William’s need for a release<br />
from his brother John would have been operative ever since their father’s death in 1691 and it is likely that<br />
William was only waiting until John turned 21 to actually obtain the release. For further support for a birth<br />
year <strong>of</strong> 1677 see McKey, 9: 24 (7 April 1698 court), in which it is mentioned that Capt. Thomas Welburne<br />
brought a suit at the complaint <strong>of</strong> John <strong>Bradford</strong>. Since, one could not sue or be sued until one reached the<br />
age <strong>of</strong> 21 (for which see McKee, 8: 107), it is likely that John was not 21 when the suit was brought. It<br />
therefore seems likely that John turned 21 at some point after Welbourne’s suit, but before John’s release to<br />
his brother William. This might indicate that his birth fell sometime between April and October <strong>of</strong> 1677,<br />
but it is unclear when precisely Welbourne initiated the suit.<br />
9.Northumberland <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Virginia</strong> Record Book 1710-1713: Deeds Wills Inventories Etc., FHL<br />
micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 32639, folio 336.<br />
10.McKey, 8: 31<br />
1<strong>1.</strong>McKey, 8: 35<br />
12.McKey, 9: 38. Joan Budd’s last known appearance in the records..<br />
13.McKey, 10: 109. Anna Donella named as wife <strong>of</strong> Thomas Budd. [N.B. When Thomas Budd wrote<br />
his will on 5 May 1721 his sons Thomas and John were not <strong>of</strong> age, so they must have been born sometime<br />
after 1700. It remains to be determined whether they were the children <strong>of</strong> Joan or <strong>of</strong> Thomas’s second<br />
wife, Ann Donella Middleton.]<br />
14.Based on search <strong>of</strong> Nell Marion Nugent, Cavaliers and Pioneers (Richmond, <strong>Virginia</strong>: The Library<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong>, 2004), volumes 1 through 3.<br />
15.Based on search <strong>of</strong> court abstracts for Northampton <strong>County</strong> (for which, see bibliography): Ames,<br />
1632-1640 & 1640-1645; Mackey & Groves, Vol. 3, Vol. 4, 5.<br />
16.I have declined to give citations for the information in this paragraph as it is all covered later in the<br />
text.<br />
17.Jennings Cropper Wise, Ye Kingdome <strong>of</strong> Accawmacke (Richmond, <strong>Virginia</strong>: The Bell Book &<br />
Staionary Co., 1911), 19<strong>1.</strong> N.B. Quote is from a secondary source quoting an original source. In 1673,<br />
King Charles II granted the entire colony to the Earl <strong>of</strong> Arlington and Lord Culpeper. The quote is<br />
presumably the language used in the actual grant.<br />
Page 57 <strong>of</strong> 74 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>