1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...

1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ... 1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...

delmarvabradfords.com
from delmarvabradfords.com More from this publisher
03.08.2013 Views

By the end of his life Nathaniel Bradford had become one of the most prosperous men in Accomack County. He began his life as a middling artisan with a 400-acre plantation and became a planter who owned 5000 acres in two different colonies. Building on his original profession as a currier in the leather trade, he incorporated other aspects of the trade into the activities of his plantation, which thereby became a center of manufacture. Evidence abounds of the scope and size of Nathaniel’s business. In 1689, a year before his death, Samuel French confessed in Northampton County court that he owed Nathaniel for the cost of making 59 shoes. 302 And in the inventory of Nathaniel’s estate, in addition to a “tanhouse”, tanning implements and 315 hides, there was found a “shoemaker shop” containing “three old seats for shoemakers” and “46 old lasts”. Forty six pairs of shoes were found elsewhere in the house. As Nathaniel possessed 165 head of cattle at his death, it may be that he supplied himself with some of his own hides. In addition to his engagement in the leather trade, there is evidence that Nathaniel engaged in other mercantile activity. It seems that even after the Virginia Assembly’s subsidy for cloth manufacture was discontinued many Virginians may have gone on producing it anyway, including possibly Nathaniel, who died possessed of 57 sheep, as well as sheep shears, flax cards and linen wheels. In Nathaniel’s cellars were found 28 cider casks and 990 gallons of cider, as well as 50 lbs ofVirginia cheese” and numerous other staples, such as corn and salt, in amounts which hint that the items might have been intended for trade and not just for the use of Nathaniel’s own plantation. Even the lack of tobacco in the inventory does not necessarily mean that Nathaniel didn’t grow it on his plantation, since the harvest would have occurred after or around the time of his death and the crop would have been sold by the time of the inventory in June, at which point the next crop would just be under cultivation. Of the 17 casks found on Nathaniel’s plantation, 10 were filled with cider and 7 were empty. It could be that these same casks had been recently emptied of tobacco and that Nathaniel produced cider in the off-season between tobacco harvests. In support of his plantation’s business, he employed half-a-dozen to a dozen servants and slaves. The diversity and scale of activities evident from the inventory of Nathaniel’s estate was typical of the gentleman planter. As Nathaniel’s “sole heir” by the law of primogeniture, William Bradford inherited Nathaniel’s servants and slaves, as well as the home plantation at Bradford’s Neck, the 500 acres on Pungoteague and the 1200 acre plantation in Sussex County. Within a year, Nathaniel’s widow, Joan (Franklin) Bradford, married Thomas Budd, 303 with whom she and John Bradford, her son by Nathaniel, went to live. For over a year William Bradford, Joan and Thomas Budd handled suits of debt arising from the settlement of Nathaniel’s estate. William sold off most of Nathaniel’s cattle 304 as well as the plantation in Sussex, 305 and completed sales of land his father had initiated, but not completed, in his lifetime. 306 * * * * * Nathaniel 1 Bradford was born in or before 1633 and died in Accomack County, Virginia between June and November in 1690. Nathaniel 1 and Alice (Smith) Bradford married before 1660 and were parents of the following 2 children: 2. i. NATHANIEL 2 BRADFORD, born before his baptism on 23 June 1661, probably on his parents’ plantation at the head of Occahannock in Northampton County; died without issue between 1687 and 1690 in Accomack County. + 3*. ii. WILLIAM 2 BRADFORD, born around 1663 in Accomack County, either at the head of Occahannock or at Matchipungo; died 1735 at Matchipungo in Accomack County. He married Bridget Fisher in Accomack County. Nathaniel and Joan (Franklin) Bradford married around or before 1677 and had at least one child: + 4*. iii. JOHN 2 BRADFORD, born around 1677 at Matchipungo, died 1742-1753 in Worcester County, Maryland. He wed first Tabitha Lecatt in Accomack County, and second Margaret ___. Page 56 of 74 Copyright 2008 Adam M. Bradford

Citations Introduction 1.Nathaniel must have been at least 21 years of age when he posted a bond for Ann West Charlton’s appeal to the court at James City in September 21, 1658 [See note 24]. That gives an absolute upper limit of 1637 for the year of his birth. However, he was probably born before 1633, since he was most likely at least 21 when he witnessed Stephen Charlton’s deed of gift to his daughter Elizabeth in October 1654 [See note 22]. 2.JoAnn Riley McKey, Accomack County, Virginia Court Order Abstracts, Electronic Edition (Bowie, Maryland: Heritage Books, Inc., 2001); 7: 22. All tithables are supposed to have been collected by June 10. 1690. 3.McKey, 8: 4 4.James Handley Marshall, compiler, Abstracts of the Wills and Administrations of Northampton County, Virginia 1632-1802 (Rockport, Maine: Picton Press, 1994), 60. [N.B. – see page 8 for a discussion of a competing theory that has Nathaniel married to Alice after the date of Richard Smith’s will.] 5.Marshall, 67 6.See William R. M. Houston & Jean M. Mihalyka, Colonial Residents of Virginia’s Eastern Shore (Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1985). William’s age was listed as 50 in August 1713 (A 8: 603). This probably comes from a deposition, but I have yet to check the original record. An independent estimate arrived at by assuming an age of 21 at his appointment as a surveyor in Sussex Co., Delaware/Pennsylvania in 1683 yields a birth year of 1662, so a birth year of around 1662/1663 seems broadly accurate, especially given that his older brother was probably born in 1660 or 1661. 7.McKey, 1: 95 8.That Joan’s marriage to Nathaniel occurred in 1677 or before is deduced from the probable birth year of their son John and is arrived at by assuming that Joan gave birth to John after her marriage to Nathaniel. For evidence of John Bradford’s birth year, see McKey, 8: 66 (19 Feb 1691/92 court), where it is recorded that John chose Thomas Budd as his guardian. Children were allowed to choose their guardians upon arriving at the age of 15, so 1677 should be a reliable upper limit to the possible range of years in which John was born. See also McKey, 9: 38 (8 Oct 1698 court), where John’s release to his brother William for the lands at Bradford’s Neck is noted. To sign a legal instrument, one had to be at least 21, which again gives 1677 as a reliable limit to John’s probable birth year. If it is certain that John was not born after 1677, his release to William hints that he was probably not born much before 1677. William’s need for a release from his brother John would have been operative ever since their father’s death in 1691 and it is likely that William was only waiting until John turned 21 to actually obtain the release. For further support for a birth year of 1677 see McKey, 9: 24 (7 April 1698 court), in which it is mentioned that Capt. Thomas Welburne brought a suit at the complaint of John Bradford. Since, one could not sue or be sued until one reached the age of 21 (for which see McKee, 8: 107), it is likely that John was not 21 when the suit was brought. It therefore seems likely that John turned 21 at some point after Welbourne’s suit, but before John’s release to his brother William. This might indicate that his birth fell sometime between April and October of 1677, but it is unclear when precisely Welbourne initiated the suit. 9.Northumberland County, Virginia Record Book 1710-1713: Deeds Wills Inventories Etc., FHL microfilm 32639, folio 336. 10.McKey, 8: 31 11.McKey, 8: 35 12.McKey, 9: 38. Joan Budd’s last known appearance in the records.. 13.McKey, 10: 109. Anna Donella named as wife of Thomas Budd. [N.B. When Thomas Budd wrote his will on 5 May 1721 his sons Thomas and John were not of age, so they must have been born sometime after 1700. It remains to be determined whether they were the children of Joan or of Thomas’s second wife, Ann Donella Middleton.] 14.Based on search of Nell Marion Nugent, Cavaliers and Pioneers (Richmond, Virginia: The Library of Virginia, 2004), volumes 1 through 3. 15.Based on search of court abstracts for Northampton County (for which, see bibliography): Ames, 1632-1640 & 1640-1645; Mackey & Groves, Vol. 3, Vol. 4, 5. 16.I have declined to give citations for the information in this paragraph as it is all covered later in the text. 17.Jennings Cropper Wise, Ye Kingdome of Accawmacke (Richmond, Virginia: The Bell Book & Staionary Co., 1911), 191. N.B. Quote is from a secondary source quoting an original source. In 1673, King Charles II granted the entire colony to the Earl of Arlington and Lord Culpeper. The quote is presumably the language used in the actual grant. Page 57 of 74 Copyright 2008 Adam M. Bradford

By the end <strong>of</strong> his life <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> had become one <strong>of</strong> the most prosperous men in <strong>Accomack</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>. He began his life as a middling artisan with a 400-acre plantation and became a planter who owned<br />

5000 acres in two different colonies. Building on his original pr<strong>of</strong>ession as a currier in the leather trade, he<br />

incorporated other aspects <strong>of</strong> the trade into the activities <strong>of</strong> his plantation, which thereby became a center <strong>of</strong><br />

manufacture. Evidence abounds <strong>of</strong> the scope and size <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s business. In 1689, a year before his<br />

death, Samuel French confessed in Northampton <strong>County</strong> court that he owed <strong>Nathaniel</strong> for the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

making 59 shoes. 302 And in the inventory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s estate, in addition to a “tanhouse”, tanning<br />

implements and 315 hides, there was found a “shoemaker shop” containing “three old seats for<br />

shoemakers” and “46 old lasts”. Forty six pairs <strong>of</strong> shoes were found elsewhere in the house. As <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

possessed 165 head <strong>of</strong> cattle at his death, it may be that he supplied himself with some <strong>of</strong> his own hides.<br />

In addition to his engagement in the leather trade, there is evidence that <strong>Nathaniel</strong> engaged in other<br />

mercantile activity. It seems that even after the <strong>Virginia</strong> Assembly’s subsidy for cloth manufacture was<br />

discontinued many <strong>Virginia</strong>ns may have gone on producing it anyway, including possibly <strong>Nathaniel</strong>, who<br />

died possessed <strong>of</strong> 57 sheep, as well as sheep shears, flax cards and linen wheels. In <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s cellars<br />

were found 28 cider casks and 990 gallons <strong>of</strong> cider, as well as 50 lbs <strong>of</strong> “<strong>Virginia</strong> cheese” and numerous<br />

other staples, such as corn and salt, in amounts which hint that the items might have been intended for trade<br />

and not just for the use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s own plantation. Even the lack <strong>of</strong> tobacco in the inventory does not<br />

necessarily mean that <strong>Nathaniel</strong> didn’t grow it on his plantation, since the harvest would have occurred<br />

after or around the time <strong>of</strong> his death and the crop would have been sold by the time <strong>of</strong> the inventory in<br />

June, at which point the next crop would just be under cultivation. Of the 17 casks found on <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s<br />

plantation, 10 were filled with cider and 7 were empty. It could be that these same casks had been recently<br />

emptied <strong>of</strong> tobacco and that <strong>Nathaniel</strong> produced cider in the <strong>of</strong>f-season between tobacco harvests. In<br />

support <strong>of</strong> his plantation’s business, he employed half-a-dozen to a dozen servants and slaves. The diversity<br />

and scale <strong>of</strong> activities evident from the inventory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s estate was typical <strong>of</strong> the gentleman planter.<br />

As <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s “sole heir” by the law <strong>of</strong> primogeniture, William <strong>Bradford</strong> inherited <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s servants<br />

and slaves, as well as the home plantation at <strong>Bradford</strong>’s Neck, the 500 acres on Pungoteague and the 1200<br />

acre plantation in Sussex <strong>County</strong>. Within a year, <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s widow, Joan (Franklin) <strong>Bradford</strong>, married<br />

Thomas Budd, 303 with whom she and John <strong>Bradford</strong>, her son by <strong>Nathaniel</strong>, went to live. For over a year<br />

William <strong>Bradford</strong>, Joan and Thomas Budd handled suits <strong>of</strong> debt arising from the settlement <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s<br />

estate. William sold <strong>of</strong>f most <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s cattle 304 as well as the plantation in Sussex, 305 and completed<br />

sales <strong>of</strong> land his father had initiated, but not completed, in his lifetime. 306<br />

* * * * *<br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1 <strong>Bradford</strong> was born in or before 1633 and died in <strong>Accomack</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Virginia</strong> between June and<br />

November in 1690.<br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1 and Alice (Smith) <strong>Bradford</strong> married before 1660 and were parents <strong>of</strong> the following 2 children:<br />

2. i. NATHANIEL 2 BRADFORD, born before his baptism on 23 June 1661, probably on his<br />

parents’ plantation at the head <strong>of</strong> Occahannock in Northampton <strong>County</strong>; died<br />

without issue between 1687 and 1690 in <strong>Accomack</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

+ 3*. ii. WILLIAM 2 BRADFORD, born around 1663 in <strong>Accomack</strong> <strong>County</strong>, either at the head <strong>of</strong><br />

Occahannock or at Matchipungo; died 1735 at Matchipungo in<br />

<strong>Accomack</strong> <strong>County</strong>. He married Bridget Fisher in <strong>Accomack</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong> and Joan (Franklin) <strong>Bradford</strong> married around or before 1677 and had at least one child:<br />

+ 4*. iii. JOHN 2 BRADFORD, born around 1677 at Matchipungo, died 1742-1753 in<br />

Worcester <strong>County</strong>, Maryland. He wed first Tabitha Lecatt in <strong>Accomack</strong> <strong>County</strong>,<br />

and second Margaret ___.<br />

Page 56 <strong>of</strong> 74 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!