03.08.2013 Views

1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...

1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...

1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

* * * * *<br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong> as Attorney<br />

On 2 March 1682/3 <strong>Nathaniel</strong> appeared in Northampton <strong>County</strong> court as an attorney for Robert Richardson<br />

in a suit for debt against Robert Riggs. 282 Robert and Susan Richardson (<strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s brother and sister-inlaw)<br />

had well before this date moved out <strong>of</strong> <strong>Accomack</strong> and settled in Somerset <strong>County</strong>, Maryland, and<br />

Robert himself died in September <strong>of</strong> the previous year, 283 so perhaps <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s suit was on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

Robert’s estate or on behalf <strong>of</strong> his son. In any case, though <strong>Nathaniel</strong> acted as an attorney in this instance, it<br />

doesn’t mean he was a practicing lawyer. There were pr<strong>of</strong>essional attorneys in <strong>Accomack</strong> during<br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s lifetime – John Fawsett, who purchased land from <strong>Nathaniel</strong>, was “the King’s attorney” in<br />

<strong>Accomack</strong> for a time, and Charles Holden, against whom <strong>Nathaniel</strong> brought a paternity suit, made his<br />

living as a lawyer before becoming the King’s attorney for the eastern shore. 284 However, in essence an<br />

attorney was simply a designated individual who had authority to represent another individual before the<br />

court – and this meant that any one could in theory appear before the court as an attorney for another. In<br />

this case, since Robert Richardson lived outside the county, he probably designated his kinsman <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

as his representative to bring the suit in Northampton.<br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong> acted as an attorney on one other occasion, when on 20 April 1674 he appeared on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

Miles Halbert, who was being sued by Isaac Jacob in <strong>Accomack</strong> court for a debt. 285 Halbert had been a<br />

headright <strong>of</strong> Colonel Edmund Scarburgh’s in 1670 and was an employee on Scarburgh’s estate during that<br />

year, in which he gave a deposition as witness to the currier Martin Moore’s assault <strong>of</strong> the Colonel. 286 It’s<br />

unknown what Halbert’s connection to <strong>Nathaniel</strong> might have been. Perhaps he became <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s servant<br />

Page 51 <strong>of</strong> 74 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!