03.08.2013 Views

1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...

1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...

1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

household. A Thomas Williams was a witness for Christopher Sadbury in <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s defamation<br />

suit against Sadbury in 1678 183 and in April <strong>of</strong> that year he was mentioned in a deposition as being<br />

with <strong>Nathaniel</strong> when <strong>Nathaniel</strong> accidentally killed one <strong>of</strong> William Burton’s hogs. 184 At Thomas<br />

Williams’ death, <strong>Nathaniel</strong> petitioned for administration <strong>of</strong> his estate as Williams’ greatest<br />

creditor. 185 Williams died owing various individuals more than the value <strong>of</strong> his entire estate, so his<br />

wife Elizabeth requested that she and her child at least be given clothing, since there would be<br />

nothing else left to her after the payment <strong>of</strong> Williams’ debts. <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> was ordered to<br />

give Elizabeth the clothing and to take Thomas Williams’ estate into his care. 185<br />

- John Reeves was certainly one <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s servants. In 1676, he petitioned successfully for his<br />

freedom from <strong>Nathaniel</strong>, who was attempting to keep Reeves for a year longer than the term <strong>of</strong><br />

service for which he had been indentured. 186 It is known that Reeves was brought to <strong>Virginia</strong> by an<br />

individual other than <strong>Nathaniel</strong>, 187 so it appears that in this case <strong>Nathaniel</strong> purchased the headright<br />

rather than arranging for the transportation himself. It is likely that this was the case with most <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s headrights, since there is no evidence that <strong>Nathaniel</strong> was engaged in the shipping<br />

business. Reeves died a few years after completing his term <strong>of</strong> servitude. 188<br />

Apart from the servants listed on <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s 1672 certificate <strong>of</strong> importation, the identity <strong>of</strong> others may be<br />

surmised from examination <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Accomack</strong> <strong>County</strong> court records. The following individuals were<br />

servants <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong> late in his life, being listed as in his possession at the inventory <strong>of</strong> his estate: Mary<br />

Stewart, Mary Shaw, William Trafford, Charles Justis and Mary Farrill. 189 Each <strong>of</strong> them was valued by the<br />

appraisers based on the time they had left to serve. Mary Farrill and Mary Shaw, who each had only one<br />

year to serve, were valued at a little over 1 pound sterling, whereas Charles Justis, Wm. Trafford and Mary<br />

Steward each had 5 years left on their indentures and were valued at between 8 and 9 pounds sterling. To<br />

give some idea <strong>of</strong> how much this was worth, passage to <strong>Virginia</strong> from England cost about 12 pounds<br />

sterling in 1680, or about 2500 lbs tobacco, and passage from Barbados 6 lbs sterling. 190 The court records<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Accomack</strong> <strong>County</strong> allow the lives <strong>of</strong> these 5 servants to be traced to some degree:<br />

- It appears that <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s son William sold Mary Stewart to Richard Bally after <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s<br />

death, as in 1692 she was presented for fornication as Bally’s servant. 191 Charles Scarburgh paid<br />

her fine <strong>of</strong> 2000 lbs tobacco in exchange for her entering his service for two and a half years after<br />

she had completed her original indenture with Baily. It also appears that she wed the man whose<br />

child she bore, a certain Jones. 192<br />

- Mary Shaw may have been the same Mary Shaw who in 1689 was in the service <strong>of</strong> Robert<br />

Hutchinson, and whose term <strong>of</strong> service was extended since she attempted to run away. 193<br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong> had several recorded dealings with Robert Hutchinson in his life: he was sued by<br />

Hutchinson in 1670 over an account 194 , and Hutchinson’s house is where a recorded conversation<br />

occurred regarding another <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s servants, the John Reeves mentioned above 195 .<br />

Hutchinson must have sold Mary Shaw to <strong>Nathaniel</strong> sometime in 1689 or 1690.<br />

- No significant records pertaining to Charles Justis exist in the <strong>Accomack</strong> court orders, but William<br />

Trafford appeared on several occasions. After <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s death Trafford, though still a servant,<br />

sued the administrators <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s estate (his son William and wife Joan) for a mare and colt<br />

that <strong>Nathaniel</strong> had given him. 196 It’s worth quoting a few <strong>of</strong> the depositions given in this matter for<br />

the details they contain:<br />

“Deposition <strong>of</strong> Henry Read aged about 62 years: About a year ago in May, Mr. Natha.<br />

<strong>Bradford</strong>, Sr., came to Read's house and asked him to come down to his house to "cut<br />

horses and desired me if I had a good pliant rope to bring it with me. 'I have promised the<br />

boy William Trafford a mare for bearing <strong>of</strong> bricks.'" <strong>Bradford</strong> had already given him a<br />

mare, but it died, so now he was giving him another mare and colt. Read said he "would<br />

give him the cutting <strong>of</strong> ye colt", but <strong>Bradford</strong> "answered that if he had given him five<br />

mares, he had not lost by it" - for <strong>Bradford</strong> had hidden plate in a water hole; Trafford<br />

found it and returned the entire amount to <strong>Bradford</strong>. The last mare delivered to Trafford<br />

was branded "with NB with ye wrong end upwards." Signed in sworn in open court 17<br />

September 1691 by Henry (R) Read”<br />

“Deposition <strong>of</strong> James Ewell aged about 55 years: About three or four years ago, Ewell<br />

bargained with <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> to do some brick work; <strong>Bradford</strong>, who was to find a<br />

helper, brought William Trafford. "After some time, Mr. <strong>Bradford</strong> came to Pungutege<br />

and ask your deponent how I liked ye said Trafford. [I] replied he did very well. So said,<br />

Page 37 <strong>of</strong> 74 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!